[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 32, Number 36 (Monday, September 9, 1996)]
[Pages 1641-1642]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Remarks Announcing a Missile Strike on Iraq and an Exchange With
Reporters
September 3, 1996
The President. Good morning. Three days ago, despite clear warnings
from the United States and the international community, Iraqi forces
attacked and seized the Kurdish-controlled city of Irbil in northern
Iraq. The limited withdrawals announced by Iraq do not change the
reality. Saddam Hussein's army today controls Irbil, and Iraqi units
remain deployed for further attacks.
These acts demand a strong response, and they have received one.
Earlier today I ordered American forces to strike Iraq. Our missiles
sent the following message to Saddam Hussein: When you abuse your own
people or threaten your neighbors, you must pay a price.
It appears that one Kurdish group, which in the past opposed Saddam,
now has decided to cooperate with him. But that cannot justify
unleashing the Iraqi army against the civilian population of Irbil.
Repeatedly over the past weeks and months we have worked to secure a
lasting cease-fire between the Kurdish factions. The Iraqi attack adds
fuel to the factional fire and threatens to spark instability throughout
the region.
Our objectives are limited but clear: to make Saddam pay a price for
the latest act of brutality, reducing his ability to threaten his
neighbors and America's interests. First, we are extending the no-fly
zone in southern Iraq. This will deny Saddam control of Iraqi airspace
from the Kuwaiti border to the southern suburbs of Baghdad and
significantly restrict Iraq's ability to conduct offensive operations in
the region. Second, to protect the safety of our aircraft enforcing this
no-fly zone, our cruise missiles struck Saddam's air defense
capabilities in southern Iraq.
The United States was a cosponsor of United Nations Security
Resolution 986, which allows Iraq to sell amounts of oil to purchase
food and medicine for its people, including the Kurds. Irbil, the city
seized by the Iraqis, is a key distribution center for this aid. Until
we are sure these humanitarian supplies can actually get to those who
need them the plan cannot go forward, and the Iraqi Government will be
denied the new resources it has been expecting.
Saddam Hussein's objectives may change, but his methods are always
the same: violence and aggression against the Kurds, against other
ethnic minorities, against Iraq's neighbors. Our answer to that
recklessness must be strong and immediate, as President Bush
demonstrated in Operation Desert Storm, as we showed 2 years ago when
Iraq massed its forces on Kuwait's border, and as we showed again today.
We must make it clear that reckless acts have consequences, or those
acts will increase. We must reduce Iraq's ability to strike out at its
neighbors, and we must increase America's ability to contain Iraq over
the long run. The steps we are taking today will further all those
objectives. Time and again, Saddam Hussein has made clear his
[[Page 1642]]
disdain for civilized behavior. He brutalized his own people, attacked
his neighbors, supported terrorism, and sought to acquire weapons of
mass destruction. Our policy is equally clear. When our interest in the
security of our friends and allies is threatened, we will act with force
if necessary. That is what we did this morning in Iraq.
I know the thoughts and prayers of all Americans are with our
military men and women who are conducting this mission. God bless them
and the Nation they are serving.
Q. Mr. President, why do you think that only Britain is supporting
our move? Why have the allies all retreated from any support?
The President. Well, I believe that--first of all, you have to ask
them their position. But I believe that we have historically, at least
in recent history, taken the lead in matters like this, and I think this
was our responsibility at this time. I talked to quite a large number of
our allies, and I am satisfied with their response. And I believe that
we will be able to go forward with this mission, and I think others feel
that at this time there may be, for their own domestic purposes, some
limits on how much they can do.
But I think it's important to move now. We have not seen any
withdrawal of Saddam's forces from the area, and we know that he has a
history of seeing how far he can go, taking a little and then doing a
little more, taking a little and doing a little more. So I can only tell
you what I believe is right and that I have done my best to cooperate
with others.
Q. Is this the end?
Q. Mr. President, he appears unbowed. He says that he's not going to
recognize the no-fly zones anymore. He says that there has been only
minimal damage to Iraqi assets, and that he urges his troops to resist
strikes. Is this over, or is there going to have to be more?
The President. Well, as always with Saddam Hussein, it depends
entirely on what he does, not on what he says but what he does. And we
were trying to have very limited damage to human beings and trying to
take an action which would show our resolve and would protect our planes
as they fly in an expanded no-fly zone. That's why the targets were
picked, to make it clear what we thought and to secure the safety of the
planes that will be flying the expanded no-fly zone.
Q. Mr. President, at this stage do you see any other troop movements
that alarm you?
The President. The present deployments and the things that we have
seen in support of them convince me that at least he has maintained the
potential to take further military action in the region. That is the
problem. He said, ``Well, we took our soldiers out of Irbil.'' That's
true, but look where they are and look what they're doing. And the
latest reports this morning are not encouraging.
So again, I will say to you, let's look and see what he does, and
that is, I think, what should drive our actions. The words are not
important; the actions are what matter.
Note: The President spoke at 8:07 a.m. in the Oval Office at the White
House. In his remarks, he referred to President Saddam Hussein of Iraq.