[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 32, Number 27 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Pages 1183-1189]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Remarks to the National Education Association
July 3, 1996
Well, thank you for that wonderful welcome. And thank you for our
good spirit and your enthusiasm. And I want you to keep it all the way
to November.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to begin by thanking Keith Geiger for
7 magnificent years of leadership for the teachers of America. He has
been a great leader, a true champion for educational reform. And I was
more moved than I can say by the kind words he spoke before I came out.
I'm sorry that we're a little late, but I understand that our
security precautions delayed your voting. [Laughter] I'm sorry for that,
but I do want to congratulate Bob Chase and all of you who will be
leading the NEA.
I also want to thank our Secretary of Education, Dick Riley, who
came over here with me. I believe he is the best Secretary of Education
we ever had, and I thank him for that. I also want to thank Dick Riley
for having what at the time was a novel idea. He thought he ought to
have an actual teacher working with him in the Secretary's office. And
she's here today. I want to thank Terry Dozier for leaving the classroom
and coming to work with Secretary Riley.
I'd like to thank the NEA for sending Sharon Robinson, our Assistant
Secretary for Educational Research and Improvement, to our
administration. And I also want to thank you for Debra DeLee who's done
a great job managing our convention in Chicago and getting ready for
this great new campaign.
Four years ago I had the pleasure of addressing this assembly. And
when I looked at the film that you just showed back stage, I saw that
address and I said, ``Gosh, I had a lot less gray hair then.''
[Laughter] Well, I earned that gray hair. [Laughter] But if it advanced
the cause of education and insured a better future for the children of
our country, every gray hair was worth it. And I thank you for staying
with us in these fights.
As teachers, administrators, custodial workers, the members of the
NEA are out there every day working with and for our children. I thank
you for that. And today, I want to talk to you about where we're going
from here.
Four years ago, when you endorsed my candidacy, I told you that I
was running because I wanted to see a vision I had of our country in the
21st century fulfilled. I wanted our Nation to go into the next century
with the American dream genuinely alive for every American without
regard to race or gender or religion or region or the station that he or
she starts our in life. I wanted to see our country come together
instead of be driven apart by our differences. I was tired of seeing the
American people cut up into little pieces at election time for short-
term political gain, instead of reveling in our diversity, respecting
our differences, and joining hands around shared values. And I wanted to
restore the sense of community in America.
And I, finally, felt very strong that our country, at the end of the
cold war and the dawn of this new global information age, had to
continue to be the world's strongest force for peace and freedom and
prosperity. I had a simple strategy. I wanted to renew the basic bargain
in America of opportunity for all, responsibility from all, and a
commitment to the community of our country, the idea that we can do more
together than we can apart.
Well, we've been working on that for 3\1/2\ years. I guess it's
about time for a report card before we make a decision on contract
renewal. I want to talk about three things here: the record, the
alternative, and the future.
When I became President, our economy was stagnant. We had the
slowest job growth since the Depression. We had a spiraling deficit. I
said, ``Please enact this economic plan,''
[[Page 1184]]
to Congress. ``We'll cut the deficit in half and produce 8 million jobs
in 4 years.'' Well, you know what the Republicans did. They all voted
against it and said it would bring on a recession. Well, they were
wrong, and we were right. In 3\1/2\ years, we now know the deficit will
be cut by more than 50 percent in 4 years. And instead of 8 million new
jobs, our economy has produced 9.7 million new jobs in 3\1/2\ years.
I asked the Congress to pass a crime bill with 100,000 new police
officers, a ban on assault weapons, more funds for punishment and
prisons, but more funds for prevention, too; to allow children to do
something constructive after school and on the weekends, and to help
them pay for summer jobs in communities that couldn't afford it.
The leadership of the other party fought us every step of the way on
that and on the Brady bill. They told a lot of people out in the rural
areas of our country who love to hunt that their weapons would be in
danger if our dangerous proposals passed, and that nothing would be done
to lower the crime rate. Well, we had a couple of years to see now. Do
you know that we had two deer seasons in my home State and two duck
seasons, and every single hunter is still shooting with the same rifle
they had before the Brady bill and the assault weapons ban passed? They
did not tell them the truth.
But there are some people who didn't get guns: 60,000 felons,
fugitives, and stalkers did not get guns under the Brady bill. They were
wrong, and we were right about that.
In 1996 the crime rate will go down for the 4th year in a row in
America because we're putting more police officers on the street,
working with communities, helping kids, giving people something to say
yes to, preventing crime as well as catching criminals. They were wrong
about that, too. We need to keep on going 'til we put all those police
officers on the street.
When it came to welfare reform, I said we ought to move people from
welfare to work, but we should be good to the children and tough on the
work requirements, not easy on work and tough on the kids. That's the
fight I had with the majority in Congress today, and why I vetoed what
they call welfare reform. They said we couldn't do it. But we have now
given over 60--60 permissions for experiments to over 40 States. Three-
quarters of the people in this country on welfare are already under
welfare reform experiments. And you know what? Child support enforcement
has gone up 40 percent since I have been in office, and there are 1.3
million fewer people on welfare today than there were the day I took the
oath of office.
When it came to families and communities, it seemed to me what we
had to do was to make it possible for more people to succeed at home and
at work. Most parents are working people today, and most people who work
have to work to support their children. We ought to be struggling to
make it possible for people to succeed at home and at work. So we cut
incomes taxes for 15 million hard-pressed working families, so that no
one who works full time and has a child in the home would be in poverty.
We passed the family and medical leave law so people could get a little
time off when a baby was born or a family member was sick.
And guess what? Poverty began to go down for the first time in many
years. And for the first time in a decade average wages are going up. So
I believe we're moving this country in the right direction.
Perhaps most important, as the film and as your speakers have said,
thanks to the Congress that was in place in 1993 and 1994, we expanded
Head Start dramatically, passed the Goals 2000 program, reformed chapter
one, passed the school-to-work program, expanded Pell grants, passed the
direct college loan program, which cut the cost and improved the
repayment terms so that no person should ever fail to go to college
because they were worried about the burden of the loans they would owe
afterwards.
These things have made a real difference. And we passed a national
service program that has allowed 45,000 young people to earn some money
for college by serving their communities all across the United States.
That's the first element of the contract evaluation. We had a strategy;
it was implemented; the results were good.
The second thing I want to say is that when you're fixing to hire
somebody, there's always the question of, well, if you don't hire this
person, who will you hire? And in this case,
[[Page 1185]]
the happy choice for America's educators, for America's parents, and for
all American citizens is you don't have to guess in this election. There
is no guesswork.
You know what both parties will do. You know what both candidates
will do. They've already put their program in. It'd be the law today,
except I vetoed it. If you want it, you can get it. Give them the White
House and the Congress; it will be the law of the land in 6 months.
You think about that. You just think about that. [Laughter] If you
want, for example, to back away from our commitment to 100,000 police,
you want to repeal the assault weapons ban, you want to undermine
protection for the environment and safety in the workplace, and make it
easier for corporations to raid their employees' pension funds--if those
are the things that you want, you can have it. Just give them the
Congress and the White House, and they'll give it to you. They already
tried to do it once. We stopped them, and we will stop them again.
If you believe we ought to drastically cut or eliminate all these
education reforms, even the Eisenhower Professional Development Program,
which you have continued to support in your own way, and I congratulate
you on your commitment to that, well, you can get that. Give them the
White House and the Congress, and they'll give it to you. They tried
once, and we stopped them. If you want, in other words, people who
believe it was a mistake to pass the family and medical leave law, a
mistake to pass the Brady bill, a mistake to pass the crime bill, a
mistake to pass the economic program, you can have it.
But that is the choice. And let's not be muddle-headed about this.
We now have the evidence. The American people can simply choose. One
position is the one that I embrace and that virtually all the members of
our party embrace who are running for the Congress. And that is that the
American people should have opportunity, not guarantees but opportunity,
to make the most of their own lives if they're willing to be responsible
for it. That is the clear understanding that we become a greater country
when we work together. The other side says, Government is always the
problem, and you're better off if you're on your own. I think that we're
right, and they're wrong. But the American people are being given the
chance to decide, and you have to help them make that decision.
Finally, there is the third element of the contract decision and
maybe the most important, and that is, so what if you did a good job,
that's what we hired you for. [Laughter] What are you going to do
tomorrow and next year and for the next 4 years? And that's very
important, because while things are better now than they were 4 years
ago, this country still has significant challenges. The crime rate is
down, but juvenile crime is up. The economy is up, but not every
American who works is up. The country is closer to peace than it was,
but as we saw again last week, we still face the problems of terrorism,
organized crime, the proliferation of dangerous weapons. And we have to
work together with our friends around the world to continue to push for
peace and freedom.
So what about the next 4 years? Well, there's plenty to do, folks.
In the area of the economy, unless we can get this Congress to act,
we've got to raise the minimum wage. We can't let it fall to a 40-year
low, it's not right.
Yesterday I was in Chicago, and I had an occasion to go to Grant
Park to that great Taste of Chicago festival they have every year. I
hated this, I had to go from food booth to food booth to food booth.
[Laughter] And it was a burden, but someone had to do it. [Laughter] But
anyway, I was at one of these booths talking to the folks who work
there, and this young woman looked at me and she said, ``You know, I
really appreciate the fact that you're trying to raise the minimum wage,
and I hear these people who are opposed to it say everybody in the
minimum wage is some middle class kid living at home with his parents.''
And she said, ``Let me tell you something: I'm a 28-year-old single
mother with two children, I work for the minimum wage, and I go to
college at night, and it's not true and I need a raise.'' And that's the
truth. And we need to do it.
We need to pass the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill so that people don't lose
their health insurance when they change jobs or someone in their family
has been sick. We need to pass a real welfare reform bill that is tough
[[Page 1186]]
on work but good to kids, that lifts up families and enables people to
succeed at home and at work. That's what we want for everybody.
We need to finish the job of putting 100,000 police on our streets,
because we're not through. The crime rate is still too high, and it will
be too high until you go home at night, turn on the television, and
you're genuinely surprised if the lead story on your evening news is the
latest terrible crime. I want you to be surprised about it again, and we
can bring that kind of safety back to America if we work at it.
We need to pass ``family leave II'' and give working people the
opportunity to have more flexible work hours and let people take a
little time off not just when a baby's born or when there's a family
emergency, but also to take their parents or their kids to regular
doctor's appointment and to go to parent-teacher conferences at the
school.
And in education we have a lot to do together. I am committed to see
every classroom and library in every school in this country hooked up to
the Internet by the year 2000, and we're going to keep doing it.
I want to thank our teachers who are working--100,000 of them--with
the support of the NEA and other groups, to teach another 500,000
teachers in what they call the 21st Century Teachers Effort, to be the
kind of teachers who can make maximum use of the new technology going
into the classrooms. We need to do that.
We need to make college education even more available. That's why I
proposed a $10,000 tax deduction per year for the cost of college
tuition. That's the right kind of tax cut, and it would help a lot of
teachers who are parents.
But I think we should do even more. I believe if you look at all the
evidence, it is clear that it is simply not enough to have a high school
education if you want to get a good job with a growing income. And I
believe the time has come to make 2 years of education after high school
just as universal as a high school education is.
I believe the way to do that is to give the American people a tax
credit, every single person a tax credit of $1,500 a year for the cost
of going to our local community college and make it refundable so that
everybody can afford to go. Give it to everybody the first year; give it
to everybody that keeps a B average the second year; let everybody at
least have access to a diploma from a community college, and we will
raise incomes in this country and bring this country together. It is the
right thing to do. [Applause] Thank you.
I believe that we should do even more for people who are in the work
force. I proposed, with the help of the Secretary of Labor and the
Secretary of Education, that we take 70 big Federal job training
programs and consolidate them and put them into a block of money and
give people who are unemployed or underemployed a certificate that
basically says, you can take this to your local community college or to
any training facility you want for up to 2 years. If you lose your job,
you can immediately begin to get retraining at the place of your choice
in your community that will help you the most to start your life again.
I also think we need to do more to help you in your work. I think we
should. I want you to understand that if the budget process this year
works out like it did last year--I hope it won't; I'm working hard with
the Congress--but I am not going to tolerate an assault on the
fundamental structure of educational opportunity and educational
excellence in this country. It is wrong. It is wrong.
We have to do more to help you to make schools safe and going to and
from school safe. We have worked hard, but still no teacher should ever
fear when he or she is in the classroom or going to and from school. No
student should be so afraid that they cannot learn. And we work very
hard to preserve funding for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools program, to
enforce our zero tolerance for guns in the schools policy. And we will
continue to work to help schools deal with the problems that they face
every day, that teachers face every day, and to try to find
opportunities to bring people together.
Last year, I had the opportunity to work with the Secretary of
Education and the Justice Department on a set of guidelines to schools
to deal with the complex questions that often arise when children seek
to practice or at least express their religious convictions. We didn't
want to turn our schools into
[[Page 1187]]
religion-free zones, and we didn't want to violate the first amendment.
Because of the work that Secretary Riley and the Attorney General did,
we have heard from schools all over America saying, this is not an issue
anymore; we have resolved this; we thank you very much. And I hope it
has helped you in your school.
We said to people in California and around the country who wanted to
try experimenting with school uniforms, ``Well, they did it in Long
Beach, and you can do it, too, if you want to do it.'' And I went to
Long Beach, California, and I heard young people tell me amazing stories
about this. A young man stood up and said, ``We picked our uniforms in
our school. We picked green and white because the gang colors are red
and blue. And for the first time, all our kids can now walk to and from
school, and they're not scared anymore.'' He said, ``It's the first time
in 2 years, I can walk to school without having to look over my
shoulder.''
I had another young woman say that even the wealthiest kids in the
school district were better off after they adopted their policy because
now, people judged themselves based on what was on the inside instead of
what was on the outside. I thought it was pretty perceptive. It may or
may not be the right thing to do. But I sure think you ought to have the
right to do it.
We have worked hard with other communities to develop community
curfews. One of our suburban communities here in the Washington area
adopted one just last week. I was in New Orleans talking about the
community curfew there. There was a huge drop, a huge drop in juvenile
crime in the city of New Orleans after they adopted their curfews. Kids
don't need to be out on the street at all hours of the night, they need
to be home or in a secure place.
And by the way, the thing I really liked about what they did in New
Orleans is that they didn't punish people who were on the streets. They
took them to a community curfew center, and they started working with
them, and they found out what the children needed and what they were
facing, so that it would not only have the disciplinary effect of
getting kids off the street, it has the positive effect of giving at
least them a chance to meet with people who could help them to put their
lives in good order and take it in the right direction.
Now, I want to propose today one other thing that I think is quite
important, that I have cared a lot about for a long time. One of the
most important things we can do to promote learning and to keep our
children safe is the most obvious, old-fashioned thing that I dealt with
when I was in school myself, back in the dark ages--[laughter]--and that
is to insist that children be in school and not on the streets.
Truancy is a warning signal that a child is in trouble and is often
a gateway to crime. The difference between success and failure in life
for our children is whether they're learning on the streets or in the
school where they belong. The street is not an acceptable alternative to
the classroom.
When I was Governor we actually passed a bill which made it possible
for local communities to fine parents if they refused to show up at
parent-teacher conferences or permitted their children to be chronically
absent. I know the NEA has called for Federal action to crack down on
truancy. So I want to tell you about two things that we're doing in
response to the call that you issued. First, earlier today I directed
the Department of Education to send this manual--I don't know if you can
see it; it says, ``Manual to Combat Truancy''--to every school district
in America. It shows that when parents are held accountable and when
communities come together, you can do something about this problem.
In Milwaukee, for example, attendance is taken at every period in
all high schools. Police pick up truants and take them to counselling,
again not just negative but positive. Parents are called at home if
their child did not attend school. Daytime burglaries: down by one
third.
In Atlantic County, New Jersey--[applause]. I'd say that's the
highest density of teachers per capita in America based on the cheers
there. Listen to this. In Atlantic County, New Jersey, families of
truants receive intensive counseling, and the vast majority of the
students wind up going back to school.
In New Haven, middle school truants go before a panel of high school
students. This
[[Page 1188]]
is very interesting. In New Haven, middle school students go before a
panel of high school students and have to sign responsibility contracts.
So these are good things to do. The Federal Government should not
decide what to do; we should help you determine what you're going to do.
We should support you when you do it. We should make sure it's legally
defensible. And we should encourage every community to do the same thing
to put our children back in school.
Yesterday Secretary Riley announced that he would give a total of
$10 million to 25 school districts to help them keep their children in
school. This is a beginning. But I want you to know because of what you
and others in education have said to me all across the country, this
will become a national priority, and we will keep at it with you until
we turn this issue around. And I thank you for that.
Now, those are the three points I want to make. One, when you helped
me and Al Gore and indeed our entire administration family--and by the
way, I wish the First Lady were here, but she's in Central Europe today,
representing the cause of freedom, and I thank you for that. When you
helped us, we said, ``We have a vision for what we want our country to
look like in this extraordinary era of possibility. We have a strategy
to achieve that vision.'' Well, 3\1/2\ years later, we did what we said
we'd do, or we got caught trying. [Laughter] The results have been
positive. Second, there's a clear difference here. And third, we've got
good ideas for the future, and a lot of work still to do.
Now, what I want you to think about as I leave--we've had a great
time today, and I loved all the cheering and the shouting, and it made
chills run up and down my spine and kind of got me in the humor for the
next 3 or 4 months to do what we have to do. And I thank you for that.
But this is what we used to call back home, preaching to the saved.
[Laughter] And there's something to be said for that, but it's not
enough. And I want you to take just one moment to be serious before I
go. I want you to just ask yourself, now or when you leave, to take a
few moments to think about everything you can think about about your
country today, all the good and the things that you think are not so
good, and then say, ``What would I like America to look like when my
children or my grandchildren are my age? What do I want America to be
like 20, 30, 40, 50 years from now?''
We are going to walk across a bridge into the next country beginning
with this election. And it's not like 1992 where you can say credibly,
this is change against the status quo. That's not so. There is no status
quo option. These are two very different visions of how we should walk
into the 21st century and what kind of bridge we should build to go
there. And the decisions we make will profoundly affect what America
looks like when your children and your grandchildren are your age.
Now, in the end, that matters more than all the petty concerns we
might have. It matters more than even the immediate and serious personal
concerns we might have. Because in the end, for the same reason you
decided to commit your careers to education, our fundamental obligation
is to maintain and strengthen this country. And we have never been able
to do it except by broadening opportunity and by bringing more and more
people together, by breaking down the barriers of bigotry and prejudice
and fear and bringing this country together in this vast melting pot of
freedom that is the most remarkable experiment in self-government in all
of human history. We are being given an historic responsibility now, you
and I, to pick which bridge we're going to walk into the 21st century.
And that will determine what this country will be like when our children
and grandchildren reach our age.
So, what I want to ask you to do is to go beyond the preaching to
the sage. I want to ask you to walk out this hall determined, with all
your other responsibilities and all your other pressures and all the
challenges of the classroom and the schoolhouse, to spend whatever time
you can between now and November talking to your family, your friends,
people who don't work with you every day, people who don't have the same
insight you may have into what goes on here about these big questions.
Because I believe with all my heart, if the American people are
given back this choice,
[[Page 1189]]
if they get to look at the big things not the divisive, distractive,
destructive, puny elements that too often dominate your politics, the
American people will do what they've been doing for over 200 years, they
will make the right decision. And your children and your grandchildren
will be the richer for it.
Thank you. And God bless you all.
Note: The President spoke at 2:22 p.m. at the Washington Convention
Center. In his remarks, he referred to Keith Geiger, outgoing president,
and Bob Chase, incoming president, National Education Association; and
Terry Dozier, former Teacher of the Year and Special Adviser to the
Secretary of Education.