[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 38 (Monday, September 25, 1995)]
[Pages 1634-1640]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Fundraiser in San Francisco

September 21, 1995

    Well, Mr. Vice President, you convinced me. [Laughter] I think I'll 
just play you a tune on Clarence's saxophone and leave. [Laughter]
    I want to thank you all so much for being here, for the support that 
you have given to me and to Al Gore and to our family and our 
administration. I wish that Hillary could be here today, but we've been 
gone all week, and she had to stay in Washington to receive an award a 
couple of days ago from the Save the Children Foundation. So we're sort 
of out here on our own, but--[applause]. I thank Dick Bloom and Walter 
Shorenstein and Ernest Gallo and Sean Lowe and my friend Susie Tompkins, 
all of you, for your leadership on this very outstanding event and all 
the rest of you who have done so much to help this administration to 
continue to do the work that we are about. I thank Reverend Cecil 
Williams for being here to pray over us and get us off to a good start. 
And I thank Clarence Clemons who, whenever I played saxophone with him, 
I loved it, because he was big enough and loud enough and good enough to 
cover all my sins. [Laughter] I loved that. And I thank the Glide 
Memorial Ensemble from--[inaudible]--for being here. You were wonderful 
today. Thank you so much. They put me in the proper frame of mind for 
what I want to say to you. You know, my first exposure to Reverend 
Williams and Glide Memorial was on Mother's Day in 1992 when I was 
running for office. And I got to talk about my mother. And at the time, 
I couldn't have known it, but I just had one more Mother's Day with her. 
And I never will forget the way I felt in that magnificent church with 
all those people coming together. They were all so different. Some were 
very wealthy, and some were living on the street. They were of all 
different backgrounds and all different dispositions toward life, but 
they were united there. That's what America is when we're at our best, 
when we're getting together and working together.
    It is no secret to anyone who lives in California and who's been 
through all the tumultuous ups and downs of the last few years that we 
are living in a time of profound change. And we have to decide how we're 
going to respond to that change. The challenge that I issue is more 
complicated because it requires all of us to do something. The other 
prevailing vision just tells you the

[[Page 1635]]

Government's the problem, and if you get rid of it, everything will be 
all right.
    I understand from long experience why that's more attractive. One of 
Clinton's laws of politics is that everybody's for change in general, 
but they're against in particular. [Laughter] And I have one famous 
story that comes out of my own political heritage in the South about 
Huey Long during the Depression when he was going around telling 
everyone in Louisiana they should share the wealth because 30 percent of 
the people were out of work and the rest of them were poor, and he could 
always get elected on his share-the-wealth platform in the Depression. 
And once he was out on a country crossroads, and he was giving his 
speech, and he identified a farmer in the crowd that he knew, who he 
thought was absolutely certain that he could make the point he wanted to 
make. And he said, ``I see Farmer Jones out there.'' He said, ``Now let 
me ask you something. If you had three Cadillacs, wouldn't you give us 
one of them to go around on all these country roads and gather up the 
children and take them to school during the week and take them to church 
on the weekends?'' He said, ``Of course I would.'' He said, ``And if you 
had $3 million, wouldn't you give us a million dollars so that we could 
put a roof over every family's head in this county and feed every 
family?'' He said, ``Of course I would.'' He said, ``And if you had 
three hogs--'' And the farmer said, ``Now, wait a minute, Governor, I've 
got three hogs.'' [Laughter] So every one is for change in general, but 
when you get particular, then it's another thing altogether.
    And what I want to say to you is, we have no choice. I believe when 
the history of this era is written, people will say that the period from 
about--well, the--sometime around the mid-1980's until the first decade 
or so of the next century was the period of greatest economic and social 
change, the biggest changes in the way we live and work that America has 
experienced in 100 years, since roughly 1895 to 1916 when we moved from 
being an agricultural and rural country to a more urbanized and more 
industrial nation.
    That's the depth of the change that is going on. We're now moving 
into, as all of you know in California, an age dominated by information 
and technology, even in agriculture and industry. We're moving out of 
the cold war environment, where the world was largely organized among 
nation-states and two big camps into a global economy, where the world 
is often disorganized, and where all the forces are toward economic 
unity in global trade but political and social disintegration. In its 
sharpest sense, you see it manifested in racial and ethnic and religious 
hatred, whether it's a war in the Balkans or the horrible things in 
Rwanda and Burundi or a bus blowing up in Israel or sarin gas breaking 
open in the subway in Japan or the awful bombing of the Federal building 
in Oklahoma City.
    It is, in short, a world that is full of possibility, the most 
exciting period the world has ever known and full of challenge. And it 
is clear that we have to bring to this new world a flexibility, an 
openness, a willingness to embrace new ideas and new approaches. It is 
also clear that we have to have a clear idea about where we want to go. 
My vision for this country in the 21st century is of a high opportunity 
nation, where we grow a lot of entrepreneurs every year and we expand 
our middle class and shrink our under class, where we empower 
individuals to make the most of their own lives and families and 
communities to solve their own problems, and where we define ourselves 
in terms of what we can do together, not how we can divide one another.
    The Governor of Florida was with the Vice President and me a couple 
of days ago, and he said--in another fast-growing, multiethnic State--he 
said, ``We have to decide whether we are going to be a community or a 
crowd. A crowd is the collection of people in the same place who swarm 
all over each other seeking their individual interests, and the fittest 
survive and the others don't do very well. A community is a collection 
of people that ban together and think they'll all do better if they all 
do well. And so they have obligations to one another which they 
recognize.''
    That's my vision. To get there, we've got to a have a lot of new 
ideas, but we have to be faithful to our fundamental values, to 
supporting freedom and responsibility; to helping families raise their 
children; to helping all people make the most of their own lives; to 
holding people accountable for what

[[Page 1636]]

they do that is destructive of our common purposes; to standing up for 
America here at home and for our best values and our better selves 
around the world; to finding common ground instead of cheap, short-run, 
partisan gain; and to doing what is important for the long run, even if 
it's unpopular in the short run.
    I say that because there are a lot of perplexing problems that 
require us to do this. And I'll just give you two. If I had told any of 
you the day I was inaugurated that within 30 months we would have, 
working with the American people, created conditions which would 
produce, 7\1/2\ million new jobs; 2\1/2\ million new homeowners; 2 
million new small businesses with entrepreneurs growing in America; 
businesses at three-quarter of a million a year, a rate never before 
achieved; the largest number of new self-made millionaires in our 
history; a stock market at 4,700, that all of these things would occur, 
but the earnings of the guy in the middle would go down one percent, 
you'd have a hard time believing that, wouldn't you? But that's what's 
happened, because in the global economy, those in wealthy countries, not 
just in the United States, but in all wealthy countries, who are not 
plugged in to the growth and opportunity of the future will be punished, 
will be rendered more insecure. And within their family lives, they 
community lives, their aspirations for the future, their ability to 
impart the American dream to their children will be impaired.
    So we have to figure out how to keep these good things going, but 
how to bring the rest of America on board. That's why this computer 
initiative being undertaken by these major California companies was so 
important. I looked at those school children that we had gathered today, 
from all their different backgrounds, from all walks of life; I saw the 
Asian children and the Hispanic children and the white children. And 
then I ran up to a little girl, and she said, ``Mr. President, I was 
born in Stevens, Arkansas, and I'm living here in California with my 
grandmother.'' Stevens is a little country town full of people who go to 
church every Sunday and sing songs like you just heard. All this is a 
very different country. We've got to get everybody on board.
    I'll give you another example. The Vice President talked about our 
crime bill. America is, believe it or not, is actually making progress 
in the war against crime and in the war to reassert social 
responsibility. In virtually every major area in this country, the crime 
rate is down. The murder rate is down. The welfare rolls are down as the 
economy improves. The food stamp rolls are down. Almost everywhere this 
is so. Drug use among people between the ages of 18 and 34 is down. 
That's the good news. Against this background, it is shocking that the 
rate of violent crimes committed by juveniles between 12 and 17 years of 
age is up. And casual drug use among people between the ages of 12 and 
17 is up. This is a perplexing thing. Too many of these children are out 
there raising themselves. Too many of them get out of school too early 
with nothing else to do. Too many of them have problems that are treated 
only with the kind of harshness that may be appropriate for some but 
won't save anybody from getting in trouble in the first place.
    And nobody has all the answers. So we have to be open to new ideas, 
rooted in old values, because we want this to be a strong country, but 
we've got to get these kids on board. We can't lose a whole generation 
of Americans. We can't have people think that life is only about power 
and money.
    Did you see the story the other day that said two-thirds of kids 
between--who belong to gangs who are under 18 think it's okay to shoot 
somebody who disrespects them? And then about a week later you had a 16-
year-old in New York kill a 12-year-old because he thought he'd been 
disrespected. It turned out the kid had a great sense of humor and was 
just--made fun of everybody. It cost him his life. What about counting 
to 10 before you do anything? What about, ``Sticks and stones will break 
my bones?'' Or the family, you know, that was subject to the hail of 
bullets because they lost their way in Los Angeles the other day? It's 
not just violence--we have come to see children as a class of people as 
something to be marketed. What I said yesterday in Denver--maybe I'm 
just getting old-fashioned, but I just came out of my shoes when I saw 
those teenagers depicted the way they were in those Calvin

[[Page 1637]]

Klein ads. I thought it was wrong. I thought it was wrong.
    But the main point I want to make is, we've got to realize that 
we're making progress on these big problems, but we have these problems 
underneath. So we need to keep doing what we're doing, but we need to be 
humble about it and recognize that we've got to have new ideas rooted in 
old-fashioned values. That's what this budget debate is all about. It is 
not fundamentally about money. Fundamentally it's about whether we're 
going to be a community or crowd and what our obligations to each other 
are.
    And I just want to mention one or two things. I favor balancing the 
budget. We never had a permanent deficit in our budget that was 
structural until 1981. We quadrupled the debt of this country in 12 
years. It's so bad that the budget would be in balance today, and we'd 
have more money to give California for defense conversion, but the 
interest rate we pay on the debt run up between 1981 and the day I 
became President has thrown us into a deficit this year. That's the only 
thing putting us in deficit. And if we don't do something about it, next 
year interest payments on the debt will be bigger than the defense 
budget.
    So no one has a stake in this kind of permanent spend-deficit 
spending. But the question is, how are we going to do it? We know how 
important education is to our future. And we know that we have programs 
that give young kids a chance to get off to a better start in life, that 
make for smaller classes and more computers and higher standards in our 
public schools; that give young people who don't go to 4-year schools 
the chance to get good training opportunities; that offer opportunities 
like AmeriCorps, to work and serve your community and earn money to go 
to college; that provide for more scholarships for poor children and 
provide for better loans at lower cost for other young people to go to 
school.
    We know that if you raise the cost of a college education, you'll 
drive down the enrollment. Look at California: college enrollment down 
10 percent in the last 2 years in the face of a bad economy. It should 
have been exploding in the face of a bad economy. So I say to you, it is 
a violation of our solemn obligation to give people the chance to make 
the most of their own lives, to have a budget in the name of balance 
that takes children off Head Start, raises the cost of going to college, 
abolishes AmeriCorps, and takes the American dream away from millions of 
Americans. It is wrong. It is a violation of our basic values.
    It is not necessary to balance the budget. We have given a balanced 
budget plan that increases our investment in education. You heard the 
Vice President talking about the environment. Hillary and Chelsea and I 
spent a wonderful summer vacation in Grand Teton, in Yellowstone 
National Park. I want you to know one thing, that any family in America 
that can get in an automobile can go in that national park for 10 bucks 
a car. That's an incredible thing. It's a priceless wonder.
    There are people who think we ought to close a bunch of the parks or 
we ought to have a--no restrain on whether you can have a diamond mine 
next door--or who actually have the idea that it is oppressive for us to 
try to preserve clean air, clean water, and safe food; people who tried 
to stop us from implementing new regulations on food safety after all 
those people died from E. coli. And believe it or not, until we 
developed these new standards, when I became President, we were still 
inspecting meat the way dogs do. [Laughter] You laugh about it--we were 
looking at it, touching it, and smelling it. [Laughter] And we've 
finished with all that. We want to put in these new regulations. People 
are trying to stop us. It is funny, but you're really laughing to keep 
from crying. It's inconceivable that anybody would say don't do that. 
Cryptosporidium killed all those people in Milwaukee--do you remember 
that--polluting the water supply. We don't want it to happen to San 
Francisco. There were people who wanted to stop us from implementing 
them, who want to take away from the EPA the budget they need to enforce 
these things.
    Now, we want to reduce Government regulation, but America needs 
clean air, clean water, safe food, and a devotion to our natural 
resources. That is a part of our moral obligation to our children and 
our future as well.

[[Page 1638]]

    There are those who want us to take away our commitment to put 
100,000 police on the street and just send a smaller check to local 
governments. We were in Jacksonville, Florida, the other day--a 
Republican county with an African-American Democratic sheriff. Why? 
Because out there where people live, crime and preventing it is a 
bipartisan issue. Out on the streets of America there's not much of a 
constituency for raising the crime rate. I'm having a hard time finding 
anybody for it. [Laughter] But back in Washington there are people who 
are perfectly prepared to do things that will lead to an increase in the 
crime rate, in the name of a balanced budget. But it is not necessary.
    If you look at the Medicare and the Medicaid issues, we have to slow 
the rate of growth in these entitlement programs. They're growing faster 
than the rate of inflation. We have to do something about that. Our 
budget does it. Their budget says, ``In order to get a $250 billion tax 
cut and a 7-year balanced budget, we'll just take $450 billion out of 
the health care system over the next 7 years.'' Well, how did you arrive 
at that number? Was there a study done? ``No. It's how much we have to 
take out to have the $250 billion and a balanced budget in 7 years.'' 
Well, what about a little smaller tax cut and take another year or two 
to balance the budget? ``No, no, no. The most important thing is 7 years 
and $250 billion.''
    Well, what about our obligation to elderly people? Three-quarters of 
them are living on less than $25,000 a year. How much can they pay in 
Medicare premiums? ``It doesn't matter; we've got to do this.'' Well, 
what about the fact that inner city hospitals here in San Francisco 
can't operate without Medicaid funding for poor children or poor elderly 
people? What are all these folks with HIV going to do if--[inaudible]--
not for Medicaid, trying to keep them alive in some dignity so they can 
continue to work and be productive members of society but have some 
access to Medicaid? And then when they really get sick, how are they 
going to get the care they need without it? ``It doesn't matter, we've 
got to have 7 years and a $250 billion tax cut.''
    These are choices, folks. These are ethical choices. We can balance 
the budget in a credible way, in a short time. We can actually have a 
modest tax cut directed to child-rearing and education and still fulfill 
our fundamental obligations to one another. But this is not 
fundamentally about money; it's about whether we're going to be a 
community or a crowd, whether we're going to have common ground or 
division.
    I think I know where you stand. What I want to tell you is, I thank 
you for the contribution, but the contribution won't amount to much if 
we don't also have the contribution of your time, your effort, your 
passion, your willingness to engage your fellow citizens in saying that 
we have to have common ground, and we can have a balanced budget and we 
can have a good economy and we can have a good education system, we can 
have it all, but only if we proceed based on our rooted values that have 
taken America to this point in time. That's what I want you to do from 
now until November of 1996.
    I want to close now with two brief points that I want you to think 
about. America has a lot of problems to face that require us to make 
difficult choices. And whether we make the right decision depends as 
much as anything else on our attitude and on whether we're willing to do 
the right thing for the long run. We have to find common ground. We need 
to reform the welfare system, but we need to do it because people on 
welfare will be better off if they can raise their children and get an 
education and be successful workers.
    It's not a lot of the budget, but it's good for our values to do 
that. Therefore, when we reform welfare, we should do it in a way that 
lifts people up, not that divides people and tries to--[inaudible]--
ethnic background. It's no longer necessary to make a conscious effort. 
I say to you, I'm against quotas. I'm against reverse discrimination. 
We've brought lawsuits against people for practicing reverse 
discrimination. But when Federal law enforcement officials, who happen 
to be African-American, get discriminated against in a restaurant that's 
part of a national chain, that is just one single example of the fact 
that we have not yet succeeded in creating an environment in this 
country where there is no more discrimination. So let's keep making the 
efforts and fix the pro- 

[[Page 1639]]

gram without doing away with it. That's what I think we ought to do. I 
feel the same way.
    Immigration--do we need to make some changes in immigration? Of 
course, we do. We have spent more money in California trying to stop 
illegal immigration and return illegal immigrants than any previous 
administration. Congresswoman Jordan--former Congresswoman Jordan from 
Texas, a very distinguished American--has made some strong 
recommendations on what the volume of immigration of the United States 
should have on an annual basis so that we can have a stable economy. But 
let's not forget one thing: Except for the Native American, all the rest 
of us came from somewhere else. We are a nation of immigrants. And we 
should be proud to be a nation of immigrants. Our gateway to the 21st 
century resides in the fact that we are the most diverse successful big 
country in the world, and we need to keep it that way and remain 
committed to it.
    The last point is this: I'll bet you anything that I have done at 
least one thing and probably a half dozen things that everybody in this 
room has disagreed with in the last 2\1/2\ years. And that's because a 
lot of our decisions that come to me are hard ones and because we are 
always pushing the envelope of possible change. But what I want you to 
know is that at least every day I am trying to do what I think is right. 
And I know that a lot of times it will not be good in the short run 
politically. There's hardly anybody that thought we were in our right 
mind when I sent our forces to Haiti to restore President Aristide and 
to remove the military dictators. But I would remind you that those 
people, those dictators, came to our country and promised on our ground 
in front of our Statue of liberty that they would go and that democracy 
would be restored, that every country but one in all of Central and 
South America is--in the Caribbean--is a democracy. We had to do that. 
The United States--if people can't look to us to make sure people keep 
their word to us and to freedom, we would be in terrible shape. And it 
was the right thing to do.
    I had all these people tell me that Hillary should not go to China. 
On both sides, they'd say, ``Gosh, if she goes, it'll be like saying 
everything that happens over there in human rights is all right,'' and 
others who said, ``If she goes and she says what she ought to say, it 
will ruin our developing relationship with China.'' But I knew that she 
would be able to say what was in the heart of every American about what 
we believe ought to be the condition of women and young girls, not in 
China but in the United States, in India, in every other place in the 
world. And she did a great job. It was the right thing to do.
    I had lots of people tell me--and they turned out to be right in the 
short run--that if we did what we ought to do and we passed the Brady 
bill and we passed the assault weapons ban and I became the first 
sitting President ever to publicly clash with and prevail against an 
organized effort by the National Rifle Association, that it would be a 
political disaster, because the people who disagreed with me about that 
would be against everybody who supported what I believed in. And the 
people who agreed with me would find some other reason to be against 
those people.
    And I can tell you today that one of the reasons that my party lost 
the House of Representatives, perhaps the main reason, is that people in 
close race, after close race, after close race in rural areas were 
stampeded and scared into believing we were trying to take away their 
right to hunt and to own weapons and to protect themselves. It wasn't 
true, but they prevailed.
    So they said, don't do it. But I kept thinking to myself, you know, 
sooner or later somebody's got to stand up and tell the truth. There are 
tens of thousands of people who could not get weapons since the Brady 
bill became law because of their criminal backgrounds. And if we can get 
a few more Uzis out of a few more high schools and off of a few more 
streets and stop a few more innocent kids from being shot down standing 
on the street corners, it is worth the consequences. We've got to stand 
up for what will be right 10 and 20 and 30 years from now. That's what I 
want to say to you. I want all of you to believe that.
    The Vice President and I sat in meeting after meeting when they 
said, ``Don't do this teenage smoking thing. Oh, everybody will tell you 
it's a great idea, but the tobacco com- 

[[Page 1640]]

panies will gut you. They will terrify all those tobacco farmers that 
are good, fine, honest people. They will convince them that you're 
trying to bankrupt them. They will mobilize people against you, and 
everybody in America that agrees with you will find some other reason 
not to be for you. Don't do it. It's a terrible mistake.'' They said, 
``There's got to be some reason no other President ever did this.'' 
Every other President always made a deal, made an agreement, did all 
this. But you know what? After 14 months of study, they came back and 
said two things. These people have known for 30 years that what they 
were doing was addictive and dangerous. They are marketing to children. 
They are trying to sell to children. And every day 3,000 children start 
smoking, and 1,000 of them will die early because of it. And it just 
seems to me that if we can give 1,000 more kids a day a chance at a 
full, good American way of life, it is worth whatever the near-term 
political consequences are.
    That is how we all have to begin to think about our future. That's 
the way I want you to think about our future. And I want you to go out 
of here just remembering with all of our difficulties, with all the 
problems California's been through, there's a reason we're still around 
here after 220 years now. This is a very great country. And when we 
remember our basic values and when we work together and when we look to 
the future, we always do all right.

    So I just want you to remember that. You stay with us, stay with 
what you know is right, and the best is yet to come.

    Thank you, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 12:27 p.m. in the Grand Ballroom at the 
Fairmont Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to dinner co-chairs Richard 
Blum, Walter H. Shorenstein, Ernest Gallo, Chang Lo, and Susie Tompkins. 
A tape was not available for verification of the content of these 
remarks.