[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 37 (Monday, September 18, 1995)]
[Pages 1541-1546]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to the Community in Carbondale

September 11, 1995

    Thank you, Jason. Thank you, Ted Sanders. I want to thank Senator 
Paul Simon and Senator Carol Moseley-Braun for being here and 
Representatives Jerry Costello, Glenn Poshard, and Dick Durbin, the SIU 
Carbondale President John Guyon, and I want to welcome all of the 
colleges and universities that are connected to us by satellite all 
around the country. Mayor Dillard, I thank you for being here, and I 
want to compliment the Saluki Marching Band and the pep band. Thank you 
for your music. Great job. I know that we have a lot of schoolchildren 
here, but I've got an especially large number of invitations from one 
middle school that marched here as a group, the Lincoln Middle School. 
There they are over there. Thank you very much. [Applause] I also want 
to thank all the national service AmeriCorps members who are here and 
who are working in southern Illinois.
    Ladies and gentlemen, I am glad to be back here at SIU, a place 
which has a very warm place in my heart. I spoke here in 1991 just 
before I declared as a candidate for President of the United States. It 
was a memorable evening. I've been back here since then. This is the 
first time I've been as President, and I am very, very glad to be back 
here. I've had a wonderful day, and I thank you for making me feel so 
welcome.
    I came here today to talk to you about the future of education in 
America, the role of the student aid programs in that future, and the 
decisions that will be made about the national budget in the next 60 to 
90 days that will affect your future and the future of all Americans.
    One hundred and thirty-seven years ago this week in Jonesboro, just 
down the road here about 20 miles, Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas 
held one of their famous debates According to a newspaper report at the 
time, interest in the event was not what it should have been. When the 
candidates arrived in town, they were met, and I quote, by ``two yoke of 
steers and a Stephen Douglas banner hanging bottom-upwards.'' [Laughter] 
Well, I didn't see any cattle on my way in, and all of the banners I've 
seen today are rightside-up, and there seems to be a good deal of 
interest. So I thank you for that, and I'm glad to see you.
    It's appropriate that we're here talking about the student loan 
issue because, as I'm sure all of you know, about halfway between here 
and Jonesboro is Senator Paul Simon's hometown of Makanda. Senator Simon 
is retiring from the Senate this year, but I want everybody in this 
audience to know that more than anyone else in the United States 
Congress, he was instrumental in supporting our efforts to pass the 
direct loan program in 1993, and no one has done more to make the dream 
of a college education a reality for all American students than Paul 
Simon of Illinois.
    The Lincoln-Douglas debates were historic because they occurred at 
an historic

[[Page 1542]]

time over an historic issue. The issue then was slavery and whether our 
country would remain united or be divided, and everyone knew the whole 
future of the country depended on how it was resolved.
    Today at the dawn of a new century, we are in the midst of another 
period of historic change. The issue today is the end of the cold war 
and traditional industrial society and the growth of the global economy, 
the information and technology age and whether we can preserve the 
American dream for all Americans in this new world. And the whole future 
of the country depends upon how we answer that great issue, just as it 
did in 1858.
    How do we keep the American dream alive in a world where jobs and 
capital, technology and ideas can travel across borders as fast as the 
satellite signal that right now is beaming this speech to colleges and 
universities all around this country? How do we make sure in this age of 
information where what you can learn depends on what you can earn--
determines what you can earn? How can we make sure that there's really 
opportunity for all people in this country without regard to where they 
live or what their racial or economic background is?
    How can we make sure that your country gives you the chance to make 
the most of your own life, a gift that was given to me and most other 
people my age that helped us to make the most of our own lives?
    This is a period of intense change, with a lot of wonderful things 
going on. I honestly believe that the young people in this audience will 
grow up into an America that will have its best days. I think the future 
is still going to be better than the past but if, only if we meet the 
challenges of this time.
    Let's face it, folks, these changes that are going on are awfully 
good for people who have an education, people who can be in the 
forefront of the change. They're pretty tough on millions and millions 
and millions of hard-working families that are being discarded by big 
companies as they downsize, forgotten by economic units for which they 
worked for 10, 20, sometimes 30 years; people who don't have a very good 
education and can no longer get the kind of jobs they used to or if they 
get a job never, ever, ever seem to get a raise; not so good for the 
million Americans who are working every year who lose their health 
insurance. Why? Because all these changes are uprooting people, 
uprooting companies, uprooting ties that used to bind. We know--we 
know--that unless we can better educate our people, too many of them 
will be left behind in the global economy of the 21st century. We know, 
today, that for 20 years most Americans earning hourly wages have been 
working harder and harder for the same or lower wages--for 20 years. And 
we know that if we want to preserve the American dream for all of you, 
we have got to turn that around. And we know how to do it.
    At the end of World War II when the GI's came home 50 years ago, the 
GI bill gave people who fought in the war a chance to go to college and 
the chance to buy their own home. And it made us the strongest, economic 
power in the world by educating our people. In the 1950's, when we got 
into a race with the then-Soviet Union into space, national defense 
education loans and other investments in higher education gave a whole 
new generation of Americans a chance to go to college and broaden their 
horizons. And it made a real difference.
    I was the first person in my family to go to college. I had 
scholarships and loans, a job in college, and six jobs in law school. I 
paid all my loans back, but if it hadn't been for those loans, I might 
never have been given the opportunities that brought me to the point 
where I am today. And I am grateful to the people in my country who gave 
me that chance.
    Now when I became President, my goal was to get this economy ready 
for the 21st century and to open opportunity for you, to create more 
jobs and to set the conditions which will allow us to raise incomes and 
raise the stability of American families. And in 1993, we passed an 
economic program that reduced the deficit from $290 billion a year to 
$160 billion, that cut taxes on the lowest income of our working people 
and made 90 percent of our small businesses eligible for lower taxes, 
and that invested more money in education, research and development, and 
the technologies of the future to create more high-wage jobs.
    And in 2\1/2\ years, we've got 7 million more jobs, 2\1/2\ million 
more homeowners, nearly

[[Page 1543]]

2 million more small businesses. But average incomes have still not gone 
up. You cannot turn around 20 years of trends in 2 years. But I am 
telling you, folks, there is no way to do it unless we continue to 
increase the number of Americans of all ages who are going on to 
colleges, from the community colleges to the 4-year colleges to the 
graduate schools of America.
    Listen to this: In 1980, a worker with a college education earned 36 
percent more than a worker with only a high school degree--1980. Today, 
15 years later, that 36 percent gap has grown to 74 percent. The 
difference in earnings between high school graduates and college 
graduates has more than doubled in only 15 years. Every year of higher 
education today increases earnings by 6 to 12 percent, and in many 
cases, guarantees the right to get a job in the first place, something 
which is increasingly rare for people who don't have a good education.
    The unmistakable faultline in America over who makes it and who 
doesn't today, more than ever before, is education. So as we go back to 
school and the Congress goes back to work, the question is, will your 
country continue to help those who want to help themselves? Will your 
country do what it ought to do now, which is what it did for me when I 
was your age? Will your country meet the challenges of the 21st century, 
or will we cut off our nose to spite our face by cutting back on 
educational aid at the time when we need to invest more in it?
    Let me be clear on this. In this great debate to balance the budget, 
I am on the side of balancing the budget. Our country has no business 
running a permanent deficit. We never had a permanent deficit before 
1981. We quadrupled the debt of the country in the 12 years before I 
became President. We have taken the deficit down from $290 billion a 
year down to $160 billion a year in only 3 years. It is important that 
we continue to work to balance the budget.
    It is important because if we can get a balanced budget, we will 
spend less of your taxes on debt and we can spend more of it on 
education, the environment, and the elderly. It is important because, if 
we have less debt, people in private business will be able to borrow 
money at lower interest rates to create more jobs. It's important to 
balance the budget. But you want to do it to strengthen the economy and 
strengthen the incomes of the American people. Therefore, I say we 
should not balance the budget by cutting education, because we do not 
have to cut education to balance the budget.
    We have worked hard in the last 2\1/2\ years to expand scholarships 
like Pell grants for deserving students, and we have worked very, very 
hard on the direct loan initiative. I see the students from Indiana 
University out here holding up their sign. This year I learned at this 
campus, you went to the direct loan program and 11,000 students got 
direct college loans. And they didn't have to spend so many hours 
filling out forms or a day waiting in line for the loan at the bursar's 
office this year because the program works.
    The direct loan program gets rid of redtape, bypasses banks and 
middlemen, sends the student loan directly to the school where the 
student gets it in a hurry. I talked to a student just a few moments ago 
who told me that the difference in this year and last year was a 
difference in 4 months and 1 week in getting the student loan. This 
program is better for the students, better for the schools, and believe 
it or not, it costs the taxpayers less money. It has been a good 
investment for America, and I thank, especially, Paul Simon and all 
these other Members of Congress for supporting the direct loan program.
    For many of you, perhaps the most important feature of the direct 
loan program is that you can now pay back your loans as a percentage of 
the income of the job you have when you leave college. This is very 
important because a lot of people go to school to get jobs that will not 
make them wealthy but that will be very important for society. They want 
to be teachers or nurses or social workers or do something else that's 
profoundly important to our country. And they borrow money that is so 
great that if they had to make the loan payment back on traditional 
terms, they couldn't do it. But if they can make the loan payment back 
as a percentage of their income, then there will never be a disincentive 
to go to school. There will never be a disincentive to staying in 
school. No one will ever have to drop out of school just because they 
think their loans are getting too

[[Page 1544]]

big. We should keep the direct loan program and keep the scholarship 
programs going.
    I also favor retaining the policy that does not charge students for 
interest on their loans while they're in school and gives a 6-month 
grace period after school before you begin making those repayments. You 
have to have a job before you can repay the loans.
    But make no mistake: With the opportunity of the loan comes the 
responsibility to repay it. I was appalled when I became President and I 
realized the size of the college loans default. I was absolutely 
appalled that there were that many people that would take money from 
their Government for a college education and not repay it. And I am 
proud to say we have cut the loan default rate in half in our 
administration, and we're going to cut it some more.
    I just want to mention a couple of other things. One of my proudest 
moments as President was having the opportunity to sign the bill that 
created AmeriCorps, our national service initiative. AmeriCorps is 
giving thousands and thousands of young people the chance to earn and 
save up money for college while serving their communities.
    In Carbondale, we have AmeriCorps members working in the local 
elementary schools, 20,000 this year, up to 50,000 next year could be 
serving their country if the Congress will continue to fund the 
AmeriCorps program. It is a great investment, and it's making America 
stronger.
    There are two other proposals that I have made that I hope this 
coming Congress will adopt. Since there will be a tax cut, the question 
is: What are we going to cut taxes for, and who will get it? I favor as 
my number one priority giving a tax deduction to hard-working American 
families for the cost of education after high school, for their children 
or for themselves.
    The second proposal that I have asked the Congress to adopt is one 
which would basically reflect the new reality of unemployment in our 
country. Thirty years ago when a person went on unemployment, the 
chances were 8 in 10 that person would be called back to the same job, 
that unemployment was a matter of the business cycle, and the 
unemployment check, therefore, just tided people over until they were 
called back to the same job.
    Today, just 30 years later, the chances are when you're laid off, 8 
in 10, that you won't be called back to the old job, and you've got to 
find a new one. Therefore, I have recommended that the Congress 
consolidate about 70 separate training programs in the Government and 
just create a fund that will give a voucher to an unemployed American 
for $2,600 a year for up to 2 years to take to the nearest community 
college or other community education institution to get the training 
that he or she needs to get back in the work force and on the road to 
progress.
    Under all these reforms I've just mentioned, if we stick with them 
by the year 2002, as many as 20 million more Americans will be able to 
get less expensive and more flexible college loans. We will be able to 
award over 3 million more Pell grant scholarships. And if we maintain 
our commitment, we're on target to increase the number of Americans who 
are going to college by over one million by the end of this decade, and 
we need it; all of us need it for the strength of the United States. 
That means better jobs, higher incomes, a stronger America.
    All this progress is now threatened by the budget debate now going 
on in Congress. The congressional majority proposes to balance the 
budget a little faster than I do and to give a tax cut much larger than 
the one I propose. Much of it goes to people who are already doing very 
well and don't really need the money.
    To do this, they have been willing to cut education and training by 
$36 billion below the present budget, which is $76 billion less than I 
propose to spend while we balance the budget, too. They've proposed to 
get rid of AmeriCorps. They've proposed to get rid of the direct lending 
program and go back to the old system which was more cumbersome, which 
will cost the students more money, which will lead to fewer people 
taking advantage of the loan program which will mean more headaches to 
the colleges and universities, but the banks will make their money back. 
That's all that will happen.
    They propose to make changes in the interest payments on college 
loans so that the cost of college loans could be raised by as

[[Page 1545]]

much as $3,000 for undergraduates and over $9,000 for graduate students. 
I'm not even talking now about the risks to the education programs that 
help kids get ready for college. Under these proposals, there will be 
50,000 fewer children in the Head Start program. All the public schools 
in our country that are participating in our Goals 2000 program will 
lose their money. The Safe and Drug-Free Schools program will be denied 
to millions and millions of American children.
    Two million American children would face roadblocks on the road to 
college between now and the end of this decade, the beginning of the 
next century, if the proposals of the Republican Congress become the law 
of the land. That is penny-wise and pound-foolish. We shouldn't cut 
education to balance the budget. We don't have to do it, and we 
shouldn't do it.
    Folks, before I came out here, I spent a fascinating hour or so 
talking to 11 students from the various States that are represented 
here, from Indiana and Kentucky and Tennessee, and I met some people 
from Missouri here earlier, as well as from Illinois, students, people 
who are starting their own lives. They're behind me today. Every one of 
them could not have pursued his or her education without the benefit of 
student financial aid.
    I'd like to ask the people who were with me before I came out here 
to stand up and be recognized. Would you all stand up? [Applause] They 
range in age from 21 to 51. One is a community college student; one is 
in graduate school. They go to public and private universities. They 
have different life stories. One has worked her way off welfare and into 
a position in college leadership. One was an Upward Bound student who is 
going to be very upward bound, who will become a doctor. All these 
people are America. They are what this is all about, not the organized 
forces that lobby in Washington. These 11 people--I am doing my best to 
represent them and their future in your Capital. That is what this is 
all about, your future.
    I only wish that every American--every American--could have heard 
these 11 people tell their stories, talk about the loan programs, the 
scholarship programs; talk about how our direct loan program works; talk 
about what it means to have hope and a new life, and to be working like 
crazy to make that life; understand that we're not talking about welfare 
here; we're not talking about giving people something they don't need; 
we're not talking about giving anybody something for nothing. We're 
talking about helping people to make the most of their own lives.
    And if you don't believe that it will hurt America to walk away from 
student financial aid, let me just ask you to consider this: In the last 
4 years, in the State of California, the State that was hit hardest by 
the recession, because they lost so many defense-related jobs, higher 
education was cut by 19 percent. And over a 2-year period, enrollment 
dropped by over 10 percent. We need to be increasing enrollment in this 
country, not decreasing it. We need more people in all of these 
community colleges and colleges and universities in all these programs 
that are critical to our future, not fewer people.
    The American dream depends upon our ability to not only create new 
jobs, but to raise wages and enable our people to compete and win in the 
global economy of the 21st century. I have been in factory, after 
factory, after factory since I've been President. We are now the most 
productive economy in the world. It is wrong for our economy to be 
growing and the American people's incomes to be stuck. And education is 
the way out. I am determined to see that you get it.
    Let me just say this in closing. Education in my lifetime has never 
been a partisan issue. When I asked the Congress to create the national 
service program, Democrats and Republicans supported it. When I asked 
the Congress to expand Head Start, Democrats and Republicans supported 
it. When I asked the Congress to invest in all of these other 
educational programs, just 2 years ago, Democrats and Republicans 
supported it. Never before has this been a partisan issue.
    Do not be fooled by the smokescreen of balancing the budget. We are 
all for balancing the budget. You do not have to balance the budget by 
cutting college aid. You do not have to balance the budget by 
shortcutting the future of America. We can do better than that. Help me. 
Stand up. Write your Members of Congress. Tell them

[[Page 1546]]

to balance the budget and increase investment in education and America's 
future.
    Thank you, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 11:58 a.m. on the Pulliam Hall lawn. In his 
remarks, he referred to Jason Ervin, student, and Ted Sanders, 
chancellor, Southern Illinois University; and Mayor Neill Dillard of 
Carbondale.