[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 36 (Monday, September 11, 1995)]
[Pages 1488-1491]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at the Alameda County Labor Day Picnic in Pleasanton, California

September 4, 1995

    The President. Thank you. Can you hear me in the back? Good. Ladies 
and gentlemen, I am so glad to be here to share Labor Day with you, to 
count our blessings and to embrace our challenges. But let me just begin 
by thanking you for that wonderful welcome. I feel right at home, and 
I'm proud to be with the working families of this country.
    I also want to say how very pleased I am to be here with all the 
distinguished labor leaders and public officials who are here behind me 
from the State of California, some from our administration; to be here 
with President Donahue. You know, this is his birthday. He has to 
celebrate his birthday on Labor Day. He gets a two-fer today, so we 
ought to say happy birthday, Tom.
    I'm delighted to be here with Jack Henning, who still gives one of 
the best speeches I ever heard; with John Sweeney and Lenoire Miller and 
Chuck Mack and George Kourpias, and all the other labor leaders who are 
here. I thank Judy Goff and Owen Marron for having me here. And I want 
to say a special word of thanks to the people who represent you in 
Congress, two of the finest people in the entire United States Congress, 
Congressman Ron Dellums and Senator Barbara Boxer. They are great 
people.
    You know, we are going through a sea change in American life. You 
know it, and I know it. What I want to tell you is I believe that when 
the history of this time is written and people look back on how you and 
other ordinary Americans lived, they will say that this period 
represented the biggest challenge and the biggest change to the way we 
live and work and raise our families of any period since 100 years ago, 
when we changed from being a primarily agricultural and rural society to 
being an industrial society and a more urban one.
    All of you know the facts. We've ended the cold war. We're moving 
into a global economy. We have more and more competition and more and 
more technology. We have more opportunities and more fears. And there 
are a lot of good things that are going on today, but there are a lot of 
troubling things as well.
    And I came here to tell you that in the next 90 days in Washington, 
DC, we're going to make some decisions that will say a lot about what 
kind of people we are and where we're going. And I believe--I believe 
that if we decide to work together and work for the future, the 21st 
century and the global economy will be America's time. But we have to 
make that decision.
    I want a high-wage, high-growth, high-opportunity future, not a 
hard-work, low-wage, insecure future for the working families of the 
United States of America.
    I've worked as hard as I know how to bring the economy back. But let 
me ask you this: You all know what the problem is. If I had told you 30 
months ago, the day I became President, that the following things would 
happen--just listen to this as a good news, bad news story. In our 
country we have 7 million new jobs. We have 2\1/2\ million new 
homeowners. We have 1\1/2\ million new small businesses. We have reduced 
the deficit from $290 billion to $260 billion a year. We have done it 
while increasing our investment in

[[Page 1489]]

education and training and technology and research to generate new jobs. 
We have doubled the loans of the Small Business Administration to try to 
create more small business opportunities.
    We have done all these things. In California, as hard hit as you 
were by all the defense cuts, the jobs that were lost in the previous 4 
years have been replaced and then some. And we're overcoming the impacts 
of earthquakes and fires and defense cuts. And California's coming back. 
But you know what? In spite of all of that, the median wage has dropped 
one percent. That means most working people are working harder for the 
same or lower wages that they were making not just 2 years ago, but 10 
and 15 years ago. That is the great challenge of this time.
    Are we going to be a smart-work, high-opportunity, high-wage 
country, or a hard-work, low-wage country where the middle class is 
dividing? And that is the thing that ought to inform every decision we 
make. I think I know what we have to do, and I want you to stand with me 
because you know what we have to do.
    The first thing we ought to do--the very first thing we ought to do 
is to say we are going to do no harm; we're going to stop trying to undo 
the protections in the American law for working men and women. We're 
going to stop trying to weaken workplace safety. Let's work in 
partnership with managers to make it a safer workplace in America, not 
walk away from our obligations to the safety, health, and welfare of the 
American workers.
    Then, what is our affirmative agenda? Number one, don't cut 
education and training--spend more on it. And for those who say we have 
to do that to balance the budget, I say, that is wrong. My balanced 
budget plan gives the working families of America a tax deduction for 
the cost of all education after high school. Our balanced budget plan 
would give working people who lose their jobs the right to a voucher 
worth $2,600 a year for 2 years to take to the nearest community college 
or other education and training institution to get a better start in 
life. Increase our investment in education. Don't cut it.
    The second thing we ought to do is to have fair as well as free 
trade. That's what the fight with the Japanese over autos and auto parts 
was all about. I'm all for more trade, but it's got to be more fair. 
It's got to be fair to American workers. We can now compete with anybody 
in the world and win if we're given a fair chance to do so.
    The third thing we ought to do is raise the minimum wage. Let me 
tell you, there is not evidence to support the claim that opponents of 
the minimum wage always make that it costs jobs. But we know one thing 
for sure: On January 1, 1996, if we do not raise the minimum wage this 
year, it will drop in terms of what the money will buy to a 40-year low. 
Two-thirds of the people making minimum wage are adults. Forty percent 
of the people making the minimum wage are the sole support of their 
families. We have children growing up on it. It is wrong to expect 
people to work for $4.25 an hour. Let us raise the minimum wage and do 
it now.
    In California, we have a lot of other things to do. We have to 
maintain the defense conversion programs that our administration has put 
in place. We should not cut the attempts to build people's future. I 
have worked as hard as I could to make sure that you knew that the 
defense contractors and the people that worked on the military bases, 
who won the cold war for this country, would not be left out in the cold 
when the defense budget was cut. And we have to keep working on that.
    Let me give you an example of the kind of thing I'm talking about. 
Today, it is my honor to announce that our Department of Transportation 
is going to give to Cal-Start, a consortium of California companies, 
$3.4 million to help them start building electric cars for the future of 
America.
    Men and women who used to weld Bradley fighting vehicles together 
for our national defense will now build family vehicles that will use 
smart technology, help the environment, and give people good jobs for a 
good future for their families. That's the kind of thing we ought to be 
doing more of in this country. They will be made at what used to be the 
Alameda Naval Air Station. This is the kind of thing that I want our 
Government to do, to work with you in partnership for the future.

[[Page 1490]]

    And just today, right before I came out here, the head of Amerigon, 
Lon Bell, and George Kourpias, the head of the Machinist Union, signed 
an agreement that commits both sides, management and labor, to teamwork 
and a true partnership on the shop floor, working together, working for 
tomorrow. America ought to follow that model. We need more of it.
    Folks, this is happening all over California. Earlier today, in 
Monterey, I dedicated the new campus of Cal State on the grounds of Fort 
Ord. They had--instead of a place that is a shell, an empty shell, 
they're now going to have a vital university. They had 4,000 
applications for the first 600 places open there. And within just a few 
years, they'll have thousands and thousands of people there, creating 
more jobs than were there when Fort Ord was running at full steam. That 
is the future of America, working together, working for tomorrow.
    In Sacramento, Packard Bell has already hired about 5,000 people, 
including 500 people where they've moved jobs from overseas back to the 
United States to northern California to assemble personal computers at a 
former Army depot, with more jobs there than were lost at the height of 
the defense production. That is the future of California and the future 
of America.
    Let me just say one more thing on this Labor Day. In the last 2\1/2\ 
years, we had 7 million new jobs, 2\1/2\ million new homeowners, 1\1/2\ 
million new businesses, record corporate profits, the stock market's 
gone to 4,700. I think it is time for American businesses to follow the 
lead of our best employers and share more of those profits with their 
working people. The Government can't do that; business has to do that.
    Thirty years ago, in the biggest companies in this country, the 
average executive made about 12 times what the average shop worker did. 
Today it's 120 times. It's time for the working people----
    Audience members. Boo-o-o!
    The President. All right, let me tell you. I'm all for people 
becoming millionaires. We've had more self-made millionaires since I've 
been President than any comparable period in American history. And I 
like that. That's the American idea. But the people of this country that 
make it go are the average working families. And they deserve their fair 
share of their own productivity and competitiveness. And it's time to do 
it.
    So when I leave you today, I'm going back to Washington for the 
critical struggles over the budget in the next 90 days. And I will say 
again, this is the period of biggest change we've had in 100 years. We 
are going to shape the future. Are we going forward together, looking 
toward tomorrow, or are we going to be divided? Are we going to have a 
high-wage, high-growth, high-opportunity future for your children, or a 
hard-work, low-wage future for half of the working people in this 
country? Those are the questions.
    Yes, we have to balance the budget, but let's do it in a way that 
increases our investment in education, technology, research, and the 
good jobs of tomorrow. Let's not walk away from it.
    Yes, middle class people ought to have tax relief for education and 
child-rearing. But let's don't cut taxes so much just to find tax cuts 
for people who don't need it and, in turn, turn around and raise the 
cost of Medicare, raise the cost of nursing home care on ordinary, 
elderly people and their middle-class children who cannot afford it. 
That is wrong. We should not do that.
    Yes, we ought to reform regulation and reduce cumbersome 
bureaucracy. You know something--this is something you ought to tell 
tomorrow when you're talking to people--our administration has reduced 
the size of Government, the number of regulations, and the number of 
Government programs more in 2 years than the previous two 
administrations did in 12. But I did not reduce worker protections and 
our commitments to clean water, clean air, and safe food. That is nuts. 
We should not do that. It is not good for America.
    So as Congress comes back to work, as you send Ron Dellums and 
Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein back to their labors, let me tell 
you, folks, send a message to everybody. This country, it got where it 
is today because we pulled together and we worked together and we worked 
for tomorrow.
    I just got back from Hawaii, celebrating the 50th anniversary of the 
end of World War II. I met with veterans from all different

[[Page 1491]]

races and all different backgrounds who forgot all their differences and 
worked together. And that's why we won. And when they came home, the GI 
bill gave them all the chance to go to college and to own their own 
homes and to educate their children. And that's why America won the cold 
war and did so well.
    This idea, this crazy idea that somehow we can go into the 21st 
century by weakening our middle class, by dividing our people against 
each other, by convincing hard-working middle class people that the 
reason they don't have a good income is because of welfare or 
affirmative action or immigration--all of which need improvement, and 
we've done more on that than the guys did before as well--but that's not 
what's holding your wage down. What's holding your wage down is the 
inability to get a fair deal in a competitive global economy because we 
need more investment in education, more investment in training, more 
investment in high-wage jobs. And you know that in your heart of hearts.
    This country never got anywhere being divided against one another. 
So let's go forward together for a better future.
    God bless you all, and thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 3:30 p.m. at the Alameda County 
Fairgrounds. In his remarks, he referred to Tom Donahue, president, AFL-
CIO; Jack Henning, secretary-treasurer, California Labor Federation, 
AFL-CIO; John Sweeney, president, Service Employees International Union, 
AFL-CIO; Lenore Miller, president, Retail, Wholesale and Department 
Store Union, AFL-CIO; Chuck Mack, secretary-treasurer, Local 70, and 
president, Joint Council, International Brotherhood of Teamsters; George 
J. Kourpias, president, International Association of Machinists and 
Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; Judy Goff, president, and Owen Marron, 
secretary-treasurer, Central Labor Council of Alameda County, AFL-CIO; 
and Lon E. Bell, president, Amerigon. A tape was not available for 
verification of the content of these remarks.