[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 31 (Monday, August 7, 1995)]
[Pages 1337-1342]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Question-and-Answer Session With Senior Citizens on Medicare

July 29, 1995

    The President. Yes, Sarah [Sarah McClendon, McClendon News Service].
    Q. What's your strategy? What's going to be the Democrats' strategy? 
We can't live with this present condition, like this, we can't do it, 
people are dying every day because they don't have preventive health 
care. And what's going to be the strategy of the Democrats to overcome 
this?
    The President. Well, first of all, we're going to try to win as many 
of the fights as we can as they come up. You know, yesterday we won a 
really important victory in the House of Representatives where, really, 
the first time since the new majority took over, over 50 Republicans 
bolted and voted to protect the environment, a very important issue in 
States like Florida and other States around the country. The House had a 
bill before it that would literally strip the Federal Government of its 
power to protect the environment. So that--and 50 Republicans joined 
with almost all the Democrats and said, no, we're not going to do that.
    So I think that we've got a chance now, a real chance to build a 
sensible, common-sense, common ground majority. And that's what we're 
going to try to do. I don't know that these Medicare cuts can pass the 
Congress. And I'm certainly going to do what I can to defeat them. 
That's our first strategy.
    The second thing, to follow up on what you said, is that we believe 
that if we're going to slow the rate of growth in Medicare spending 
dramatically, without imposing great new costs on seniors and making the 
system work, we ought to take a little of that money we're going to save 
and put it into preventive care, to try to help people take care of 
their parents or their grandparents outside of institutions, outside of 
nursing home care. I think it would save money over the long run. It 
wouldn't cost a lot of money to start, and we'd sure find out over the 
next 2 or 3 years.
    And in my budget, we do--we take some of that money to put into home 
health care. We've put some of that money into respite care for people 
with Alzheimer's. We do some other things with it, and we'll be able to 
monitor over the next 2 or 3 years whether it saves money or not. I 
think it will, and it doesn't have anything to do with stabilizing the 
trust fund. So that's our strategy.
    And I'm encouraged by yesterday's vote on the environment that there 
may be some Republicans willing to brave the pressure, the enormous 
pressure they've been under to toe the line, to do what's right for 
America. So I'm encouraged.
    Q. Mr. President----

[[Page 1338]]

    Q. Larry, let's go do the discussion first and then we'll----
    The President. Larry, what were you going to say?
    Q. I'm sorry.
    The President. I want to hear from all of you first, and then we'll 
take the press questions.

[At this point, Mayor Norman Abramowitz of Tamarac, FL, asked the 
President to continue the fight to protect Medicare and Medicaid and 
asked if he would address the concerns of the younger generation and 
their desire for change.]

    The President. Well, you tell--first of all, tell them I won't give 
up the fight. We've just begun the fight. But I think, to be fair, the 
young people of our country are worried about their own future. And it's 
an amazing time in our country. We've got--just since I've been 
President, we've brought the deficit down, we've got 7 million new jobs, 
we've got a record high stock market, we've got a record number of new 
businesses. But a lot of people, including a lot of young people, are 
working harder for less. They feel more and more powerless. And so a lot 
of them think, well, maybe the answer is to turn against everything 
we've done in the past, turn against programs like Medicare, turn 
against the elderly, walk away from everything that's been done.
    And the problem with that is, all they will do is make themselves 
and their parents and their own future worse. We have to properly 
analyze what's the matter, and we have to get the kind of change we 
want. We do need to raise incomes as well as create jobs, just like we 
need to stabilize the Medicare trust fund. People are living longer and 
longer, so there are more people drawing Medicare. And the older you 
are, on balance, the more you use the health care system. So the cost 
per person goes up as people get over 80, let's say. But the answer is 
to fix it in a way that won't break it and that won't bankrupt the 
seniors of this country.
    And I think it's--you know, I'm glad you mentioned Medicaid. A lot 
of people think Medicaid is exclusively a program for young, poor people 
on welfare. And two-thirds of Medicaid money goes to the elderly and 
disabled. That's what funds the parents of middle class America who have 
to go into nursing homes, for example. And if you look at the nature of 
the Medicaid cuts, we're going to see a lot of middle class Americans 
who will no longer be able to afford to send their kids to college 
because they'll be paying for their parents in nursing homes if they can 
afford to do that.
    So, the answer--I think you ought to tell these young people, we are 
in a period of change. And we have to change our Government policies to 
be prepared for the 21st century. But the answer is to enable everybody 
to make the most of their own lives, not to pit one generation against 
another or one group of Americans against another. That is a dead loser 
for this country. That is a really foolish thing to do. It helps a lot 
of politicians win elections when they can pit people against one 
another, but it doesn't help the country much. And we have never 
progressed doing it. You look back in the whole history of America, we 
have never taken one step forward by pitting one group of Americans 
against another one, and we never will.

[A participant described a recent illness she suffered and explained 
that she had been very concerned that Medicare would not cover the 
expenses. She stated that she was fortunate that she had daughters to 
help provide care for her but that the average older person cannot 
afford the expense of a serious illness and the nursing care required.]

    The President. But you know, your story illustrates a point that the 
mayor just made. I mean, first of all, for about 10 years now, the 
elderly in our country have had a lower poverty rate than very young 
people. And that's a wonderful thing. And two things did it, the cost of 
living on Social Security and Medicare. That's what did it.
    Now, if we put another half a million older Americans in poverty 
with this program, is that going to lift any little children out of 
poverty? No. Is that going to help that young worker? No. All you're 
going to do is take more money out of the incomes of middle class 
working people who are working harder for less.
    So the answer is to raise their incomes and increase their security. 
The answer is not to

[[Page 1339]]

make this swap. And who would get the benefit of this, this tax cut? I 
want to emphasize again, this money is not necessary to fix the Medicare 
trust fund. They don't have to make this much savings.
    And an enormous amount of this huge tax cut is going to people who 
don't even need it, and many of them, frankly, don't want it. Many of 
them do not want it. I've had a lot of upper income people tell me that 
they do not want--they want to balance the budget, take care of 
Medicare, invest in education, get this country going. So I--this is a 
battle we have to win.
    Yes ma'am. Go ahead.

[A participant described a letter the President sent her about 
Medicare.]

    The President. Bless you.
    Q. And I know you want it because you wouldn't have done it. You 
wouldn't have done this today. You didn't have to sit here.
    The President. Thank you.
    Go ahead.

[A participant stated that if Medicare and Medicaid were cut, a great 
number of disabled and elderly people would fall below the poverty 
line.]

    Hillary Clinton. One of the concerns we have--and I think one of the 
reasons the President wanted to do this, to go back to Sarah's question, 
is there's a lot of misinformation out there. And I think, Mayor, that's 
what some of the young people are responding to. And we're now seeing 
ads being run that are trying to scare people and trying to say that, 
you know, if we don't do what the majority in Congress wants to do, then 
there won't be any Medicare. A lot of real scare tactics. And I think we 
have to get the information out to people.
    For example, there's a difference, as you know, between Part A and 
Part B of Medicare. And what the President has proposed in his budget 
will improve the trust fund. But the beneficiary cuts and the additional 
costs that the majority in Congress want older people to have to pay out 
of their own pockets have nothing to do with the trust fund.
    The President. ----nothing to do with the trust fund.
    Mrs. Clinton. See, this is one of those shell games. Remember when 
you'd walk down the street and you'd see how fast people could do all 
that, and I never could figure it out--well, it's going on again. But 
it's going on in a much more serious way, trying to really keep the 
balls moving so fast that they think that they'll fool people, and not 
just fool older people but fool the children and grandchildren, so that 
people will think, well, all they're trying to do is to fix the Medicare 
trust fund, and so if people have to pay more--not remembering that 75 
percent of the people on Medicare make less than $25,000 a year--so 
where are they going to get the $2,000, the $5,000 to pay more? And it 
has nothing to do with the Part B cuts, with the Part A trust fund.
    So that's one thing that we have to keep explaining to people. And I 
think the truth, as is often the case, is one of our most effective 
arguments.
    The President. A lot of people, like a lot of young people, don't 
know. They'll see these ads, and they think, well, they're trying to fix 
the trust fund. But I just want to remind--look, we need to do a little 
history here. When--1993, when I gave the State of the Union Address and 
I became President, I said, look, we've got to fix the trust fund. In 
1994, I said, we have to fix the trust fund. When I presented health 
care reform, I said, we have to fix the trust fund. A lot of these same 
people, now, who are alarmed about the trust fund said, ``There's no 
real problem, there's no health care crisis, what's he talking about?''
    Then when a report comes out this year and it shows we've actually 
improved things for the trust fund but we still have to fix it, they 
say, ``Oh, we have to fix the trust fund, and that's why we need to load 
all these costs on the seniors.'' But the costs--I want to say again 
what the First Lady said--the costs being loaded on the individual 
seniors do not go against the trust fund. They're being used to finance 
an excessively large tax cut and to balance the budget at the arbitrary 
date of 7 years.
    And, you know, it is just not fair. I have never seen a time when 
the seniors of this country were not willing to bear their fair share, 
were not willing to make their own

[[Page 1340]]

contributions. You know as well as I do, modest changes have been made 
in Medicare and Social Security over the years. That's not what this is 
about. This is about just what Mr. Flemming said; it's about taking the 
heart out of this program, to drastically change the way the 
Government's priorities are. And it is wrong. And you and your children, 
your grandchildren, in some cases your great-grandchildren, you've got 
to stand up against it.

[A participant stated that she resented claims that the President and 
the Vice President are scaring older people.]

    The President. I'm not trying to scare anybody. But I am trying to 
arouse----
    Q. I'm defending you----
    The President. I am trying to arouse the citizens of this country. 
I've seen scare tactics. I've had them used against me and what I was 
trying to do. I saw a couple hundred million dollars worth of scare 
tactics last year when I was trying to secure your health care future. 
So I know all about scare tactics. I'm not trying to scare you, but I 
think it's wrong for people to go around with this little plan to mess 
with your Medicare and try to keep the details of it secret until the 
11th hour, then pop it through and have it all gone. And I think we need 
to--this is like a covey of quail. We need to flush it--[laughter]--get 
it out there and see what's going on here.
    Go ahead, what were you going to say, ma'am?

[A participant said that she was concerned that Medicare cuts could 
affect the number of older women who get mammograms.]

    Mrs. Clinton. Well, I'm glad you raised that because we've got the 
experts back there who run this program, and we know that one of the 
barriers to older women getting regular mammograms is cost. And if we 
make the cost of Medicare even more expensive for older people in 
general, but particularly women, then the preventive health care that 
they need--which will save us all money if people take care of 
themselves and get those tests--will be lost as well.
    And I want to say one other thing because I think this is part of 
the--sort of the scare tactics as well that are being used. A lot of 
people say, ``Well, families should take care of each other, and 
families should be there for each other, and the Government shouldn't do 
it.'' The majority leader has said, you know, he doesn't want any part 
of Medicare; it shouldn't be a program in any free country, and 
everybody should take care of themselves.
    Well, I think everybody in this room certainly and most people I 
know around the country do everything they can to help their parents. 
Your daughters came to take care of you, and you're grateful that they 
could. And we will continue to do that, financially, emotionally, in 
every way we can. But there are two, I think, realities we have to look 
at. There are a lot of older people who don't have those children and 
those grandchildren. There are a lot of older people who have outlived 
their children, who don't live anywhere near their children or their 
grandchildren, who are in no position to be able to get any help. What 
we are going to do with them, particularly all these older women who are 
on their own?
    And the second thing is that because a lot of young people are 
struggling very hard for themselves I have no doubt they would make the 
sacrifice if they had to, but with the cost of medical care, my 
goodness, we will drive more young people into poverty if they have to 
spend all of their assets to try to help take care of their parents and 
their grandparents. That's why what we're talking about here is 
something that doesn't just affect older Americans. It affects every 
single American, no matter what our age. And I hope that people will 
understand that more.

[A participant suggested that the President needs to be very clear about 
how he intends to reform Medicare so that there is no confusion about 
the differences between his proposal and the Republican proposal.]

    The President. That's what the First Lady said. These personal costs 
that are going to be loaded on the individual seniors under their plan 
do not make a contribution to stabilizing the trust fund. They are not 
necessary to stabilize the trust fund, and we don't have to do it.
    I know we've got to break up. We'll hear from one more person.

[[Page 1341]]

[A participant expressed concern for minorities, many of whom live in 
poverty, if Medicaid is no longer an entitlement, especially in view of 
cutbacks in assistance at the local level.]

    The President. It's a mistake. Let me just say this. Just look at 
the--you know, of course, the main Medicaid benefit to seniors is 
nursing home care. And, you know, most States have more people in 
nursing homes under Medicaid than Medicare--way more.
    But let's just talk about the next generation. Let's talk about the 
children. We've all got a big stake in seeing how well they do. If you--
Medicaid is the program that provides health insurance to really poor 
children in this country. Now, you tell me what's going to happen if you 
block-grant Medicaid and you don't require the States to come up with 
their portion, and the next time the State legislature meets in 
Florida--let's take Florida, a State I know quite a bit about--you know, 
Hillary and I have--her family live there, two of her brothers. Let's 
just take Florida. And it's a fast-growing state. And they come in and 
we have a legislature, and the people say, we don't have enough money 
for the schools. And they're telling the truth, because it's fast-
growing. And then they say, we've got all these new communities, and we 
don't have enough money for the water systems we need or the sewer 
systems we need. And they'll be telling the truth. Or we don't have 
enough money for the road systems we need. And they'll be telling the 
truth.
    Now, then let's say the seniors have a strong enough lobby to come 
in and save the money for the nursing homes. What happens? They'll cut 
off all the aid to the poor children. And then what happens if you take 
the health care away from the poor children? Then all of us will be 
paying for them when they're either really sick or they don't develop 
mentally and physically as they should 5, 10, 15 years down the road.
    This is not a good idea. This is a bad idea. Not all change is good. 
We've got to have the right kind of change. And you're absolutely right. 
And I hope you will fight for it. And I will fight for it. And we just 
need to tell the American people about it. We can prevail.
    Thank you. You guys have been great.
    Q. Mr. President, just to give you a chance to respond to, 
undoubtedly, what the Republican response will be. They say that you 
have not offered a really detailed proposal of your own for changes with 
Medicare----
    The President. Have they? Have they? What I have done--I have done 
what's important. I have said, we are not going to accept the 
beneficiary increases that they are. I have said that we can fix the 
Medicare trust fund without requiring the kind of cost increases on 
these folks that they are recommending to pay for their tax cut. That is 
a huge change.
    Secondly, I have said that we don't have to do as much on the 
provider side into the health care system as they want to do, because I 
want to balance the budget in 10 years instead of 7. So, any set of 
options I adopt, they will have to adopt more severe options, which is 
why they want to go into the August recess with their plan a secret and 
why they allegedly apparently have plans to come back here and drop this 
thing out right before the fiscal year begins and allow about 2 days 
debate on it and then roll it through.
    Now, I have proved--when I had responsibility for the budget, I did 
that. We made the Medicare trust fund better, with no help, I might add, 
from them. Not a single vote. We made it better. They denied that there 
was a problem with the trust fund. Then when they won the majority in 
the Congress, what happened? All of a sudden they discovered this 
problem in the trust fund and they used it as a pretext to raise costs 
on Medicare beneficiaries so much so they could pay for the big tax cut 
they promised and meet the 7-year balanced budget deadline they 
promised.
    If you want to talk about--am I willing to work with them on 
Medicare reform to fix the Medicare trust fund? Absolutely, I am. Why 
did I present a balanced budget and alternative? So I could reach out my 
hand in good faith to work with them. So far that has not been an 
option. So far they have been proceeding down their own course. All I'm 
saying is, I am serving notice that I will not support what they are 
attempting to do to the seniors.

[[Page 1342]]

    Now, we can fix the Medicare trust fund. It doesn't have anything to 
do with what we've been talking about here today.

Note: The President spoke at 10:12 a.m. in the Oval Office at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Arthur Flemming, chair, Save Our 
Security.