[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 29 (Monday, July 24, 1995)]
[Pages 1265-1272]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Satellite Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session With the National 
Council of La Raza

July 19, 1995

    The President. Thank you, Irma Flores Gonzalez, for that warm 
introduction, and thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your warm 
welcome.
    I'm glad to see so many of my friends out there, and I want to say a 
special hello to your president, Raul Yzaguirre, and Irma's predecessor, 
Dr. Audrey Alvarado. The First Lady sends her regrets at not being able 
to be with you today. I hope you won't be too disappointed that I'm 
going to be her stand-in. I'm also sorry I can't be with you in person, 
as I was last year in Miami.
    Just a little over an hour ago, at the National Archives here in 
Washington, I announced the results of our administration's review of 
Federal affirmative action programs and my convictions about what we 
ought to do with affirmative action. I made it clear that an essential 
part of our search for common ground in the exercise of our freedom is 
an unwavering commitment to genuine equal opportunity for all Americans. 
Affirmative action is simply a tool in the pursuit of that enduring 
national interest, equal opportunity.
    Hispanics are making huge strides in ways we cannot have even 
imagined just a generation ago. I don't want any Hispanic child in 
America to feel that his or her race is an impediment to full 
achievement. Every child has a right to the American dream, and all of 
us have a responsibility to nourish that dream.
    But until this country has achieved equality of opportunity, until 
we have stamped out discrimination, we will still need the remedy of 
affirmative action. It must be done the right way: It must be flexible; 
it must be fair; and it must work. Let me be clear: Our administration 
is against quotas; we're against guaranteed results; but we do need to 
guarantee genuine equality of opportunity for all Americans.
    We want to support the programs that are working, and we want to get 
rid of the ones that aren't. If you ask me in a sentence what we need to 
do, I'd say we need to mend but not to end affirmative action. We ought 
to stay with our principles and fix whatever practices we need to fix.
    Our study showed that, indeed, affirmative action has been an 
effective tool in expanding opportunity for those who have suffered 
discrimination, in the Army, in education, in small business loans, in 
employment by Federal contractors, in the set-aside programs.

[[Page 1266]]

We have seen again and again that when affirmative action is done in the 
right way it has helped more minorities and women to pursue the American 
dream, people like Paul Gutierrez in Omaha, who owns Midwest 
Maintenance, Ernest Gonzalez of West Babylon, New York, who owns a 
chemical distribution company, Santos Garza of Bethesda, Maryland, who 
owns a security company.
    After 25 years of experience, we know that these programs can work, 
but we also know that there have been some problems with them. So it is 
time to take a good look at what's working and what isn't. That's why I 
announced the series of steps that we'll take to change and to improve 
our approach to affirmative action. First, we want to crack down on 
those who take advantage of other people who deserve the program through 
their own fraud and abuse. We'll still offer new businesses a leg up, 
but we're going to make sure the set-asides go to the businesses that 
need them most.
    Second, we're going to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in 
the Adarand case last month. That means focusing set-asides to regions 
and business sectors where the serious problems of discrimination are 
clear and provable. I have directed the Attorney General and the 
agencies to move forward with this expeditiously. The Adarand decision 
did require us to improve the way in which we do affirmative action, but 
I want all of you to understand, it did not dismantle set-asides. In 
fact, a huge majority of the Supreme Court, seven of the nine Justices, 
reaffirmed the need for good affirmative action because of the 
continuing evidence of discrimination in our national life.
    The stricter standards of Adarand have been met by State and local 
governments who were ordered several years ago to adhere to these 
standards. And the best State and local set-asides that have been 
challenged have met the standards and survived the challenge.
    The third thing we need to do is to help disadvantaged people and 
distressed communities wherever they are and regardless of their race or 
gender. That's what we tried to do in the empowerment zone program. And 
that's why I've asked Vice President Gore to develop a proposal to use 
our contracting in the Government to support businesses that locate 
themselves in truly distressed areas or that hire many of their workers 
from these areas.
    The truth is that there are whole pockets of America that have been 
left behind in the free enterprise system. And we need to give people 
incentives to invest in those areas and those people, not as a 
substitute for affirmative action but as a supplement to it. We need to 
do this. Most of these areas will be disproportionately minority but not 
all of them will be. I am convinced we have got to focus on getting 
people who are in these isolated areas, whether they're in rural or 
urban areas, the benefits of the American dream. We cannot grow the 
American economy in the 21st century if we continue to have pockets of 
abject poverty where people are dying to go to work.
    I have also directed all our agencies to apply four standards of 
fairness to all our affirmative action programs: first, no quotas or any 
inflexible numerical straitjackets in theory or in practice; second, no 
illegal discrimination of any kind, including reverse discrimination; 
third, no preferential treatment for people who are not qualified; and 
finally, when a program has met its goal it must be retired. Any program 
that doesn't meet these four principles must be eliminated or reformed.
    Affirmative action has been good for America. That doesn't mean it's 
always been perfect. It doesn't mean it should go on forever. It should 
be retired when its job is done, and I am resolved that that day will 
come. But you and I know that job is not done yet, and we do not need to 
abandon affirmative action.
    It is my firm belief that our diversity can be America's greatest 
strength in the 21st century. We're going into an information age. We 
have to be prepared to compete and win in the global economy, with all 
of its different cultures. And we are so well positioned in this 
country, with well over 150 different racial and ethnic groups, with 
opening opportunities to women as well as men but we have to say to 
ourselves honestly, we are not where we need to be. And we're going to 
need everyone pulling together if our country is

[[Page 1267]]

going to move into the 21st century in good shape. So we can't back away 
from our commitment to expand equal opportunity and to require 
responsibility from every single American.
    You know, I ran for President to do two things: First, to restore 
the American dream of opportunity and the American value of 
responsibility; and second, to bring the American people together again, 
so that we could move into the next century together. I have learned in 
the past 2\1/2\ years that we can't do one without the other. We can't 
solve our economic problems or our social problems unless we do them 
together and unless we come together. We all have to bring the American 
people together.
    That's really the bottom line of this debate about affirmative 
action. You and I and all Americans have to sit down and find a way to 
bridge the great divides in our society. We have to find a way to honor 
our diversity in the context of our shared values, our shared interests, 
and our shared commitments to both equal opportunity and to high 
standards of qualification and performance. If we do this, we'll be 
stronger; we'll be better prepared as a nation to meet the challenges 
that lie ahead.
    By the year 2010, Latinos will be the largest minority group in our 
country. Your voices and your talents are absolutely critical to lead us 
into the new century. You're already doing that in many ways, in daily 
life and in public service.
    We should all be grateful for the work that all of you do, but I 
want to mention one of your number in particular, New Mexico Congressman 
Bill Richardson. He did a great job in Haiti. He did a great job in 
North Korea. And I know how proud all of you are, and I can hear by your 
applause, at the work he did, the brilliant work he did to help to bring 
home the two Americans who were wrongfully imprisoned in Iraq. He is a 
great American and every American should be grateful to him for what he 
did.
    Just last week at the Southwest Voter Registration and Education 
Dinner, Vice President Gore announced my intention to honor another 
great American, Willie Valasquez, with the Presidential Medal of 
Freedom. I am honored to honor the memory of a man who gave all of us so 
much. For too long, Latinos were deprived of the chance to serve in the 
highest levels of government. This was a loss for your community and a 
loss for our Nation. We are a rich country but not so rich that we can 
afford to waste the talents of so many of our best people. Willie 
Valasquez knew this, his memory and legacy are alive in every corner of 
our administration.
    And as we continue to move forward together, you know that we have 
more to do. But there are already more than 2 times as many Hispanic 
appointees in our administration than in the previous two 
administrations. In addition to Henry Cisneros at HUD and Federico Pena 
at the Department of Transportation, there are so many others who are 
contributing to our country and our future.
    Let me just make one other point in closing, and then I know you 
have a question or two. You have to help us as a country make sure that 
this affirmative action program is not used as one more way to divide 
middle class and working poor Americans.
    The real problem that is driving this new debate on affirmative 
action is a problem you know well. The ground is moving under America. 
Look at the last 2\1/2\ years. I have instituted a new economic strategy 
that has helped to bring us 7 million jobs. We have an enormous increase 
in the number of new businesses, the highest on record. We have more new 
millionaires than ever before. The stock market is at an all time high. 
Corporate profits are high. But you know what? More than half the 
American people are working harder today for the same or lower wages 
they were making 2\1/2\ years ago. More than half of our people still 
feel insecure about their jobs, their health care, their retirements, 
their ability to educate their children. Now, these are things that we 
have to face.
    I know Secretary Dick Riley has already talked with you about the 
need to strengthen our commitment to education. But before I go on that, 
I want you to focus on this. A lot of this heat on affirmative action is 
being generated by people who want to blame minorities, who want to 
blame women's groups, and who want to blame the Federal Government and 
this administration for the economic distress of the middle class. It's 
been building for decades, and we have a strategy

[[Page 1268]]

to do something about it. Affirmative action: it did not cause the 
economic problems of middle class America. And affirmative action alone 
will not solve all the economic problems of women and racial minorities 
in this country.
    So what we have to do is to say, let's look at affirmative action on 
its own merits. Let's realize we're all stronger when we grow together. 
But let's also recognize that we have to have a strategy to lift this 
country up. Don't let the people who are pursuing policies that will 
drive us down and drive us apart prevail by preying on the legitimate 
anxieties of middle class Americans to get this country moving for them 
again.
    That all begins with a commitment, a renewed commitment to 
education. This issue is so important to all of us here that I just want 
to take one minute to echo and amplify what Secretary Riley said to you. 
Affirmative action without a commitment to education won't work. School 
is where young people learn the skills to pursue middle class dreams. 
It's where middle class values are taught and where parents can know 
that the teachers will reinforce things like responsibility and honesty 
and trustworthiness and hard work and caring for one another and for our 
natural environment, where good citizenship can be taught and where it 
can be modeled.
    A good education has always been key to unlocking the promise of 
tomorrow. And today, more than ever, those without it are being left 
behind. That's why, under our plan, we can balance the budget and 
increase educational investment by $40 billion in proven programs that 
work, from expanding Head Start to more affordable and repayable college 
loans.
    The plan of the Republican majority in Congress will balance the 
budget, all right, but it cuts education by $36 billion, right at the 
time when we need to be doing more to prepare our young people to take 
their productive places in the global economy. It does not make sense. 
It also doesn't make sense for them to cut funds on the fight on crime, 
cut our investments in safe and drug-free schools. There are a lot of 
things that don't make sense.
    So, as we work in the coming months to balance the budget, I hope 
you'll help me do it in the right way. If we take a little longer and we 
don't give huge tax cuts to people who don't really need it, we can 
invest in middle class Americans and in poor Americans who were 
determined to work their way into the middle class.
    You and I know it would be self-defeating to cut our investments in 
education. Cutting education today would be like cutting defense budgets 
at the height of the cold war. Our national security depends upon our 
ability to educate all of our people, to give them the tools they need 
to make the most of their own lives.
    Our mission, yours and mine together, must be to build a bridge to 
the future so that every American can cross it. We have to give every 
Latino and every other American the power they all need to make the most 
of their own lives and to give their children better lives. That's 
what's behind my approach to affirmative action. That's what's behind my 
commitment to education. That's what's behind my economic strategy. I 
want our children's generation to inherit an America with as much new 
opportunity as the one into which I was brought into. If people take the 
kind of responsibility you have taken to make our country better and we 
do the right things here, we will be better.
    I thank you for your service to your community. I thank you for your 
service to your country. I ask you to stay at it, stand up for the 
proposition that all of us are going forward together.
    Thank you, and God bless you all.
    Q. Mr. President, we have three important questions we want to ask. 
I will ask the first one. A recent NCLR report shows that Hispanic women 
are the lowest paid workers in the country and there is substantial 
evidence that Latinos experience discrimination on the basis of both 
national origin and gender. In light of your speech earlier today, how 
do you see the administration addressing the needs and interests of 
Hispanic women?
    The President. Thank you.
    First of all, I'd like to talk a little bit about our survey. In our 
Working Women Count Campaign, conducted by Secretary Reich at the 
Department of Labor with the able assistance of Hermalinda Pompa of the 
Women's Bureau, we circulated a questionnaire

[[Page 1269]]

to working women. Two hundred and fifty thousand Hispanic women replied. 
They told us they were interested in pay and benefits, in having the 
ability to both work and to care for their children, and in making sure 
that women could be valued and treated properly and fairly in the 
workplace.
    We are determined to do what we can to advance this cause. First of 
all, we want to make sure Hispanic women understand the rights and 
opportunities to which they're entitled as working Americans. And we 
have translated into Spanish, for example, information on the family 
leave law, information on the sexual harassment laws, information on 
pregnancy and other employment discrimination practices. I think that is 
very important.
    But secondly, and even more important, we have to pursue an economic 
agenda that will help Hispanic women. We, first of all, have to raise 
the minimum wage. There are 300,000 Hispanic women in this country who 
would make an average of more than $1,800 a year more than they're 
making now and put another $1 billion into the American economy if we 
raised the minimum wage. And if we don't raise the minimum wage, next 
year, in terms of its real buying power, the minimum wage will fall to a 
40-year low.
    One of the real big fights we're having up here in Washington today 
is the fight between my vision of a smart-work, high-wage future and the 
alternative vision of a high-profit but hard-work and low-wage future. I 
think it's clear which one is in the best interest of the American 
people. We ought to start with raising the minimum wage.
    The second thing we need to do is to pass the ``GI bill of rights 
for America's workers,'' which includes consolidating all the various 
Government training programs into one big pool and then giving people 
who are unemployed or under-employed the right to a voucher worth $2,600 
a year for 2 years, which they can take to the local community college 
or anyplace else if they want to get retraining and education after they 
have left high school and when they're in the work force. That is a very 
important proposal we have made that has achieved--gotten too little 
attention. I think we have a chance to pass it, and we ought to do so.
    The third thing that we ought to do in my opinion is to concentrate 
tax relief on middle income families and on child-rearing and education 
costs. That will help Hispanic women enormously.
    The fourth thing we need to do is to pass the welfare reform bill 
that has been proposed in the United States Senate by Senator Barbara 
Mikulski, Senator Daschle, and Senator Breaux, which focuses on giving 
people who are on welfare the child care they need so that they can be 
able to go to work, they can be required to work, and we can end welfare 
as we know it by helping people be good parents.
    So these are just some of the things that I think we ought to do, 
and I hope you'll help me implement it. We have to win this budget 
fight. All this is going to play out in the context of the budget fight. 
Our budget fight is good for growing Americans. It's good for children. 
It's good for middle class people. It's good for people who want to work 
their way out of poverty. And we have to win it.
    Q. Thank you Mr. President. This is Raul Yzaguirre. Let me first 
state how gratified we are to learn of your posture on affirmative 
action. And we support and we stand by you on that posture and that 
position.
    You will, however, recall that your administration received some 
criticism early on for its appointments and its appointment record with 
respect to Hispanic-Americans. Since then, there have been gains and 
some losses, particularly within the White House itself. Furthermore, 
there is a perception that you have not enjoyed the benefit of frequent 
consultation with Latino community leaders on key issues of importance 
to the Latino community. Will you commit today to begin to practice 
affirmative action for Hispanics within your own administration and 
particularly in the White House itself? And further, what steps are you 
prepared to take to improve the quantity and the quality of your 
consultations with the Hispanic community?
    The President. Well, first of all, let's deal with the facts as they 
exist. Our administration has appointed more Hispanics than any 
administration in history, more than twice as many as either of the 
previous two, and several hundred. We also have major domestic

[[Page 1270]]

policy considerations in the hands of Secretary Cisneros and Secretary 
Pena.
    I've also had the privilege, as you know, to have the regular 
counsel of the head of the EEOC, Gil Casellas; Norma Cantu at the 
Department of Education; Maria Echaveste at the Department of Labor; 
Nelson Diaz at HUD; George Munoz at Treasury, Aida Alvarez at HUD, 
Fernando Torres-Gil at HHS, Katherine Archuleta at Transportation and 
Joaq Otero at Labor, among others.
    And at the White House, as you know, we have lost some people, but 
we still have an awful lot of talented Latinos on our staff. In fact, 
one of them made history this afternoon. Carolyn Curiel personally 
helped me craft my affirmative action speech. She had more to do with 
drafting it than anybody else. And she is the first person of color and, 
more importantly, the first Latino in the history of our country to 
write speeches for the President. And it may be that the one she wrote 
today will go down as one of the two or three most important I have ever 
delivered. In the White House, as you know, she's joined by Rick 
Hernandez, Janet Maguida, Ray Martinez, Liz Montoya, Suzanne Ramos, 
Suzanna Valdez, Vicki Rivas-Vazquez, Araceli Ruano, and others.
    Now, I want to answer you two questions here.
    Number one, I am always looking for more good people for important 
appointments to boards and commissions and other things. But I want to 
point out again, if you look at my record on judges, I have appointed 
more than 3 times as many Hispanic judges in the first 2 years of my 
Presidency as Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Carter combined did in the 
first 2 years of their Presidency. And in only 2 years, I have appointed 
more judges than any other administration in history. So I think my 
record is pretty good on that. I do want to continue to do better. And I 
do believe that there is more we can do.
    Now, on the consultation issue, I really think that's one I really 
need to put back on you because my perception is that we have reached 
out, and we have consulted, and we have had a lot of good meetings that 
were more than just briefings but were really asking for input. If you 
don't believe that's true, then what I think you ought to do is make a 
proposal to me and let me see if I can accommodate it so that we can 
give you and all the people you represent and the people that you work 
so hard for and do such a wonderful job for the feeling that they do 
have an open door and a listening ear at the White House, because in the 
end that is maybe the most important thing.
    I have to keep working on these appointments because that empowers 
people who, in turn, send ripples all across the country. A lot of these 
judges, for example, will serve for 20 or 30 or more years and will make 
decisions that will, together, affect millions and millions of people in 
positive ways.
    But while I am here, your feeling of access and involvement and 
participation in this administration is perhaps the single most 
important thing that I can give you. So I want to say again, I would 
like to invite you to make a proposal about how you think we should do 
it, what the right way to do it is. I will do my best to accommodate it 
and, in any case, we will make sure that people feel that we are moving 
this issue forward.
    Q. Mr. President, we accept your invitation, and you will have a 
proposal on your desk Monday morning.
    We have one last question of extreme urgency and importance to many 
of the people in this room today that we'd like to ask. You have spoken 
out, Mr. President, eloquently against the forces of hate that led to 
the Oklahoma City bombing and the need for greater civility in public 
debates.
    We could not agree with you more. We live in a time of almost 
unprecedented immigrant bashing which we, in our community, view as a 
manifestation of these forces of hate. All Latinos, including the 
majority of us who are native-born citizens, feel we are targets of this 
rising tide of hate. You clarified this morning the need for all of us 
to come together in a united front. How do you plan to include those of 
us that are immigrants, those of us that look like immigrants in this 
plan to unite America?
    The President. Well, first of all, let me say that I think there is 
a rising tide of--it's sort of the same--I view the immigration issue 
rather like the affirmative action issue. In the case of affirmative 
action, I think there were legitimate questions raised about the

[[Page 1271]]

way the programs work and whether they need reform. There were even some 
who asked honestly whether affirmative action was the right or wrong 
thing for America. And then there were a whole lot of people that were 
using affirmative action to drive a political wedge in this country as a 
false excuse for the problems of the American middle class and the 
economic anxieties broadly felt by Americans.
    I think the immigration issue has sort of flared up again, in my 
judgment, driven by two factors. One is the general economic anxiety of 
Americans and the feeling that we are at an all-time high in the number 
of immigrants we let in every year, and that that may be depressing 
wages and causing economic difficulties.
    But I think the far more important problem is the sense that this 
country has been very undisciplined in its handling of illegal 
immigration in ways that have cost the taxpayers an awful lot of money 
and undermined our sense that our laws matter. And so, I think we need 
to have the same attitude about immigration that I have about 
affirmative action.
    This is a country of immigrants. The fact that we have so many 
immigrants in this country and that they come from so many different 
places, from so many different racial ethnic and religious backgrounds 
is a mother lode of opportunity for us. The fact that Hispanics are 
fast-moving to become our largest minority population is a godsend, 
given the fact that for the next 20 to 30 to 50 years our greatest 
opportunity for growth and trade will be in Mexico, Central and South 
America, and in the Caribbean. So I see this as a positive force.
    And I think we have to do several things. Let me just mention some 
of the things we are trying to do. I think we have to examine our 
immigration policies in a factual, calm, nonpolitical way just as we try 
to do with affirmative action. I think we need to do whatever we can to 
reduce the burden of illegal immigration without unduly hurting innocent 
children.
    As you know, I opposed Proposition 187 in California. I was 
unsuccessful, but I did my best. And I did it because I thought it was 
unfair to children and counterproductive and self-defeating. On the 
other hand, I noticed that the post-election polls showed that 
significant percentages of Hispanic-Americans voted for it, not a 
majority but a significant percentage. And I think the reason is that a 
lot of people don't like having people who deliberately violate our laws 
spend our tax money. I think that is a very--it is very hard to defend 
that practice, and I don't intend to defend it.
    So I have tried to keep America open as an immigration-friendly 
society while toughening our ability to enforce our own immigration laws 
and to deport people who are here illegally, especially those who come 
in contact with the criminal justice system. I also believe, however, 
it's very important that legal immigrants be encouraged to pursue their 
citizenship and that we do what we can to accelerate it.
    I would like to look at this note here. We naturalized in 1994 half 
a million people. That's a 50-percent increase over 1992. And we're 
trying to break that record this year. I have directed the INS to get an 
extra almost $10 million to help to process people for naturalization. 
We're trying to get volunteers. We're doing everything we can in that 
regard. And I have repeatedly spoken out against immigrant bashing and 
negative feelings.
    So I think that what we need to do is to have a sensible approach to 
immigration. It needs to be open. It needs to be nondogmatic and 
nonbigoted. We need to be firm but reasonable in the way we deal with 
the problem of illegal immigration. And we need to try to get as many of 
our immigrants who want to do so to become citizens as quickly as 
possible so that the American people will all see that this is a part of 
the process of American history which is a good one for our country.
    Q. Mr. President, we thank you very much. And you'll have our 
proposal on Monday. And we're here to help you with advice if you need 
us. Thank you very much.
    The President. I always need it. I thank you. For the members of the 
Hispanic community who gave me advice and had input on the affirmative 
action speech, let me thank you especially. This was a very important 
day for America. I hope that what I said

[[Page 1272]]

and the way it was said will reach the hearts and minds of the vast 
majority of the American people. I believed it very deeply. And I thank 
all of you who have had any input on that directly or indirectly.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke by satellite at 2:16 p.m. from room 459 in the 
Old Executive Office Building to the convention meeting in Dallas, TX. 
In his remarks, he referred to Irma Flores-Gonzalez, chairman of the 
board, NCLR; and Willie Velasquez, who was executive director, Southwest 
Voters Registration and Education Project.