[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 22 (Monday, June 5, 1995)]
[Pages 929-932]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Interview With the United States Air Force News in Colorado Springs

May 31, 1995

    Q. Sir, thanks for letting us have the interview, first. Could you 
give me just your impressions after giving the speech at the Air Force 
Academy? What are your thoughts about our next generation of military 
leaders?
    The President. Well, I was terribly impressed with them. You know, I 
stood up there and shook hands with every one of those young people when 
they came across to get their diplomas. I talked to many of them, and I 
looked them all over pretty good, and I feel a lot better about my 
country. I think every American would feel an enormous sense of pride 
and confidence in our future if our people, if all of our people could 
have seen what I saw today.
    Q. Quality of life is a major concern in the military today. 
Military members spend a lot of time away from their families. Housing 
is a problem. Depending on who you talk to, you get different quotes of 
how far the military trails their civilian counterparts. What can you do 
to assure the military people that the military is a good career? What 
incentives can you offer?
    The President. Let's talk about the quality of life issues, apart 
from pay, just for a moment. One of the things that I have done since I 
have been President is to go back to Congress on a couple of occasions 
to try to get more funds to fund quality of life improvements, to 
improve the housing, to improve family supports like child care centers, 
to do the kinds of things that would make the military more attractive 
to stay in, and to make it more family-friendly, because you know a 
majority of our enlisted personnel now are married. And I think that's 
very important.
    I am, frankly, reassured that the new Congress, even though we're 
going to have to cut a lot of spending, has committed to maintain the 
defense budget that I have laid out and also continue to support my 
request for extra funds for quality of life improvements.
    I visit a large number of bases every year, and whenever I have 
time, I try to talk to not only our uniformed personnel but some of the 
spouses and, when possible, even some of the children, about what the 
quality of life is like and how we're doing. So I can tell you that I 
think the Congress, and I know the President, we are committed to trying 
to address these issues and improve them. In the years when the drawdown 
was so quick, from '87 forward, I think some of the quality of life 
issues did suffer, the quality of housing and some of the other 
supports. But we're going to have an opportunity to try to address that, 
and I'm committed to doing it.
    Q. You touched on the increased OPS tempo, and we will get to the 
pay, but is the drawdown over? I mean, can we say that the drawdown is--
--
    The President. Yes, it's leveling out. And the other thing I wanted 
to say about the quality of life is that so many people are being asked 
to do so many more missions away from home and more different things. 
That is inevitable. That's part of the changing nature of our security 
mission in the world. But we are looking at using more reserves, more 
guardsmen to help us.
    I just got back from Haiti not very long ago, and I was quite 
encouraged by the suc- 

[[Page 930]]

cess of the reservists and the guardsmen in Haiti, how happy they seemed 
to be to be there and how it helps to alleviate overly stringing out our 
full-time personnel. So that's another thing we're going to look at.
    We've got a real problem with AWACS teams with that, as you probably 
know. And we're going to look at that as well as the possibility of 
using some reservists in fulfilling our AWACS missions.
    Q. The drawdown, are we at----
    The President. The drawdown, we're about done. We're leveling out 
now. And we're going to be able to--we're going to have to manage it 
very carefully from here on out, because we are committed still to 
maintaining throughout this century a level of force in Europe somewhere 
around 75,000 to 100,000. We have obligations in Korea which we 
certainly can't shrink from now, particularly as we're trying to work 
through this difficult issue of the North Korean nuclear capacity. And 
we're also heavily committed in other parts of Asia in ways that I think 
would be a mistake to walk away from.
    And then, of course, a lot of our forces that are based here in the 
United States are being used all around the world in different ways. We 
have obligations in the Atlantic and in the Adriatic related to Bosnia 
and NATO generally, and we have to be available to do the kinds of 
things that we had to do in Haiti, the kind of things we did in Rwanda.
    So I believe we're just about leveled out. And I think it's 
important that we not go too low. We don't want to repeat the mistake 
that we've made after every single conflict in the 20th century. We went 
down too fast. We did it after World War I; we did it after World War 
II; we did it after Korea; we did it after Vietnam. And we went down too 
far.
    I think that the length of the cold war has given--and the 
experiences, the bitter experience of trying to rebuild after Vietnam 
has given our current crop of military leaders and our political 
leadership a little better historic memory. And I think there's a real 
sense of pride that the United States clearly has the finest military in 
the world, the most well-motivated, the most--the best trained, the best 
equipped, and in many ways the most talented. And I don't think anybody 
wants to do anything to undermine that. So--and I think all of us who 
know anything about it know that we have stretched you about as thin as 
we can.
    Q. How do you attract the kind of people that it takes to maintain 
that best equipped, best Air Force, especially with the gap in the pay?
    The President. Well, I think the--I think--first of all, let's talk 
about the pay. We now have the funds from Congress to now resume pay 
increases and to keep it up at whatever the legal level is. And if 
Congress chooses to raise the legal level--that is, they choose to let 
us do a little more percentage-wise per year--we'll even be able to keep 
up with that as long as it's not too much. But now we at least know we 
can fund pay increases every year up to the legally authorized limit, 
which is a good thing.
    And I think what--most people that join the military know they'll 
never get rich, but they want to know that they're not going to be 
impoverished, and they want to have a predictable income. So my goal 
here is to have a predictable income that goes up on a regular basis so 
that if you join or if you reenlist, you'll know what the 5-year trend 
is going to be, for example.
    In addition to that, I think it's important to maintain the 
educational benefits, both the Montgomery GI bill benefits and to 
emphasize what I think a lot of people get out of the military, which is 
that they can do exciting and interesting things and they're almost 
continually being educated and trained. I mean, if every major company 
worked on developing the capacity of its people the way our armed 
services do, we would be even more powerful economically than we are.
    So I think that--I think the mission is what really attracts people, 
and knowing that if they join the United States military forces, they'll 
be the absolute best in the world at what they do, and they'll be doing 
something wonderful for their country.
    But I believe that maintaining the quality of life issues and 
keeping the training and readiness up and making sure that people have 
the chance to be continuously retrained for different things, those 
issues--based on what the service personnel I have visited with in 
Europe and Asia, in the Pacific, and all over the continental United 
States, based on

[[Page 931]]

what all those folks have told me--I would say those are the major 
issues.
    Q. Mission: what is the mission, do you see, in the future for the 
military? Are we going to be a security force for the world, or do you 
see it turning more to looking inside our own borders? Or is it going to 
be a happy medium of that?
    The President. Well, I think that we will do more and more things in 
cooperation with others, just by the nature of it. I think we will be 
working with the United Nations; we'll be working with NATO; we'll be 
working with the Partnership For Peace. I think we'll be called upon in 
small numbers to--just because our prestige means so much--to help do 
things. We had 10 personnel, I think only 10, that were involved in 
trying to help resolve the border conflict between Ecuador and Peru. But 
it made a huge difference that a small number of American military 
personnel were willing to be part of a bigger unit. And we felt 
comfortable that our people were not going to be put in harm's way by 
doing that.
    So I think we'll be doing a wide variety of things. But our 
fundamental mission will be, first and foremost, as long as there is a 
threat to the United States from nuclear powers, we will be arrayed so 
that we can protect against that threat. Secondly, we will be deployed 
so that we can protect our treaty alliances, the people to whom we have 
sworn mutual security commitments. And we have those obligations, and we 
will honor them. Thirdly, we will try to use our military resources so 
that we can reduce the threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass 
destruction and the threat of terrorism to our people and the threat of 
disruptions in other countries which could affect our security. That's 
what we did in Haiti, for example, where we were able to restore 
democracy there. And then when we can perform a humanitarian mission 
with an acceptable limitation on the mission and acceptable level of 
risk, and we have enough control over the circumstances that we have to 
be involved in, as we did in Rwanda, I think we still should be prepared 
to do that.
    I think that we did a lot of good in Somalia. We had the most 
painful experience that I've had personally as Commander in Chief there. 
But our people did a lot of good. They saved hundreds of thousands of 
lives. But because of the relationship between the United States and the 
United Nations, we were in an untenable position there for a period of 
months, and we paid a terrible price for it. But we learned from it. And 
in Rwanda we went in under different circumstances and, again, saved 
countless thousands of lives in ways that, again, helped the security of 
the United States because of what it did for our relationship to all the 
African countries.
    So there will be a lot of things we have to do. But we have these 
core security missions that I mentioned first and foremost that we must 
continue to maintain.
    Q. Finally, sir, you've basically got the attention of the entire 
Air Force. Is there anything you would like to pass along, add, that we 
didn't cover today?
    The President. I would like to say, first of all, a simple thank-you 
to the members of the Air Force for their service and for their 
dedication. I realize that these last few years have been very difficult 
for people who have been through them with downsizing. There's never 
been anything like it, as far as I know, in the public or the private 
sector, for a successful enterprise to come out on its feet the way our 
military has. And I'm very grateful, not only as President but as an 
American citizen.
    Secondly, I would like to say that I and my entire administration 
are committed to trying to improve the quality of life, to trying to 
keep the pay coming, to trying to make the circumstances as good as they 
possibly can be, that the future will be more exciting, more diverse, 
and therefore a little more strenuous in some ways than perhaps the past 
has been, but we will do our best to make the Air Force an attractive 
career for dedicated, committed American patriots. And as long as the 
people out there are doing their best, we owe it to all of them to do 
our best. And that's what I'm committed to doing.

Note: The interview began at 2:25 p.m. in the Tea House at the U.S. Air 
Force Academy.

[[Page 932]]