[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 20 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Pages 838-841]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on the National Performance Review

May 16, 1995

    Thank you very much, Mr. Vice President, Secretary Reich, Mr. Dear, 
to our friends from Maine, all of them, for the fine work they have 
done. Congresswoman Norton and members of the DC City Council and others 
who are here, we're glad to be in the District of Columbia and in one of 
the most interesting workplaces I've been in in a while. I want to thank 
the folks who work here for making us feel welcome and for taking a 
little time off from work to let us come in and interrupt the flow of 
events. I'm sure that's not a terrible burden. [Laughter] I want to 
thank Mr. Gawne for having us here. Mr. and Mrs. Gawne made us feel very 
welcome when we came in, and they didn't waste much time in establishing 
the productivity of their leadership by pointing out that they have 6 
children and 14 grandchildren, and most of them are here today. 
[Laughter] I'd also like to say a special word of appreciation to the 
Vice President's reinventing Government team who worked so hard on 
this--Elaine Kamarck is here and many others who worked so hard on it. I 
thank all of them.
    We have taken this business of trying to make the Government work 
and make sense very seriously. We have worked at it steadily now for a 
good long while. We think it's one of the most important things we can 
do to make the American people believe, first of all, that their tax 
dollars are not being squandered but instead are being well spent and, 
secondly, to fulfill some important public objectives.
    Protecting the health and safety of our country's workers is an 
important national value. It's something we should all share. From the 
Triangle Shirtwaist fire back in 1911, which galvanized the conscience 
of our Nation, to the fire in Hamlet, North Carolina, in 1991--which I 
remember so very well because 25 poultry workers were killed there and 
thousands and thousands of people work in the poultry industry in my 
home State--we have recognized that we have a special responsibility as 
a people to ensure that workers are not put in undue jeopardy. We don't 
believe that anyone should have to endanger their personal health or 
their very lives to make a living for their families, to live a life of 
dignity.
    But still, in spite of all the progress that has been made, over 
6,000 Americans every year die at work. That's 17 a day. And about 
50,000 more people die each year from exposure to chemicals and other 
hazards in the workplace. Six million Americans are injured, and the 
injuries alone cost our economy over $100 billion a year. So it is 
obvious that we still have work to do and that to whatever extent we can 
reduce death and injuries in the workplace, we will not only improve the

[[Page 839]]

quality of life in this country, we will also reduce the cost of these 
terrible tragedies in ways that strengthen our economy.
    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has been at work 
in this cause since it was created with bipartisan support in 1970. 
Since that time, workplace deaths have been cut in half. Cotton dust 
standard has virtually eliminated brown lung disease. Deaths of 
construction workers from collapsing trenches has been cut by a third. 
There have been many achievements that all Americans can be proud of. 
And today, we should reaffirm that commitment.
    But we also have to recognize that like other Government regulatory 
agencies, OSHA can and must change to keep up with the changes and the 
times. We also recognize that any organization that is established and 
gets going in a certain direction, if it's not careful, whether it's in 
the public or the private sector, can wind up pursuing prerogatives that 
strengthen its organization rather than fulfill its fundamental mission.
    That was the brilliance of the story that the Vice President told 
about what the Maine OSHA people did and how they changed, not only 
replacing yesterday's Government with a new Government that fits the 
needs of an information age that is less bureaucratic and that 
recognizes that the way we protected workers' safety in the last 25 
years may not be the best way to do it in the next 25 years but also 
recognizing that, frankly, sometimes the rules have simply become too 
complex, too specific for even the most diligent employer to follow and 
that if the Government rewards inspections for writing citations and 
levying fines more than ensuring safety, there's a chance you could get 
more citations, more fines, more hassle, and no more safety.
    So we believe that in this, as in every other area, we have to 
constantly innovate. And we're announcing these initiatives today.
    Let me say to you that of all the things we've done in reinventing 
Government, this one has a particular personal meaning to me because of 
the experience I had for so many years as the Governor of my State. We 
were one of 29 States, first of all, that had a partnership with OSHA. 
And we worked hard to help implement the worker standards that the 
National Government set with State people who worked in partnership with 
manufacturers, because in the 1980's, when manufacturing was going 
downhill in America, we were increasing manufacturing employment in my 
State, partly because we had that kind of partnership.
    I was interested in it from a human perspective because I spent so 
many hours, countless hours, in literally hundreds of factories in my 
State talking to the people who worked in the factories, watching what 
they did. And finally, I became personally acquainted with it because 
for several months in one year I was Governor, I took a day off a month 
to work in manufacturing operations. That will give you a clear 
perspective about wanting to be safe in the workplace. I worked in a 
food processing plant. I worked in a joist manufacturing operation. I 
helped to make refrigerators from 3 p.m. to midnight one night on a 
Friday night. And I even worked in an oil refinery. And it gave me a 
keen appreciation, first of all, for the need of people who are 
operating these things to be treated in a fair and sensible way by the 
Government so people could make a living and they could make a profit; 
and, second, for the absolute imperative for people to be able to work 
in a safe and secure environment.
    Unless you've ever seen one of those huge metal stamping machines 
come down on a piece of sheet metal, you can't imagine what it was like 
to think about the days when people had to put their hands under those 
machines with no guards, knowing one mistake would be the hand would be 
gone forever. Unless you've actually seen things like that, it is hard 
to visualize what is at stake here.
    We believe in this country that you can do the right thing and do 
well. We believe that is a general principle that we have to have 
throughout the economy. Mr. Correll, here from Georgia Pacific--I've 
been in every single one of his operations in our home State. And they 
have done some remarkable things. I believe you can do the right thing 
and do well. And we have to see day in and day out that we have a 
Government that makes sure we're all trying to do the right thing and 
that we can do well at the same time.

[[Page 840]]

    That is what we are trying to do today, saying to businesses, you 
have choice. You can put in place a health and safety program that 
involves your workers and that tries to find and fix hazards before an 
accident happens, and OSHA will be a partner. There will be reduced 
penalties or, in some cases, no penalties at all. You will be inspected 
rarely, if ever. You will get help when you want to comply. But if a 
business chooses not to act responsibly and puts its workers at risk, 
then there must be vigorous enforcement and consequences that are 
serious when violations are serious.
    This new approach is not an abstract one. We have seen it. It works 
in Maine. If it worked in Maine, it will work everywhere else. To borrow 
a phrase from politics: I hope when it comes to worker safety, as Maine 
goes, so goes the Nation.
    Secondly, we need to make sure that worker safety rules are as 
simple and sensible and flexible as they can be. You've already heard 
the Vice President say that OSHA will now allow plastic gas cans on 
construction sites. That may not sound like a big deal, but it's 
absolutely maddening if you're on the other side of a dumb regulation 
like that. Until now, OSHA required that work site first aid kits be 
approved by a doctor. That doesn't make a lot of sense, So, from now on, 
you can buy one at the drugstore.
    This is just a downpayment on the things that we intend to do. As 
part of the page-by-page regulatory review I ordered earlier this year, 
on June 1st, I expect to see dozens and dozens more rules on my desk 
ready to be discarded or fixed, including hundreds of pages of detailed 
standards that have literally been on the books unchanged since the 
early 1970's.
    The third thing we intend to do is to extend our reinvention to the 
way men and women on the front lines work with employees and businesses 
to promote safety. I'm interested in results, not redtape. The Vice 
President says that all the time. We're determined to make that the rule 
of the land, in worker safety, in the environment, in every other area 
that we can possibly extend it to.
    We're interested in prevention, not punishment. It would suit me if 
we had a year in this country where OSHA did not levy a single fine, 
because if that happened, we'd have safer workplaces, more productive 
businesses, we'd be making more money with happier people going to work 
every day.
    We are going to redesign OSHA's offices, five of them every quarter, 
to produce safety, not just citations. We're cutting the time between 
the complaint by a worker and the resolution of a problem in half. We're 
focusing inspections on the gravest hazards. Already if a construction 
site has a strong health and safety program, inspectors are limited to 
the biggest hazards, lasting a few hours, not a few days. Now we'll 
expand that to other industries as well.
    We want to use common sense and market incentives to save lives. 
Last year, the OSHA office in Parsippany, New Jersey, had an idea: 
Rather than finding a hazard, writing a citation, fighting for months 
about it, why not give the employer a financial incentive to simply fix 
it on the spot? That leads to more safety and much less hassle. Lives 
are already being saved there, too. And today, we are determined to 
expand this so-called quick fix program nationwide. There really are 
some quick fixes when you're dealing with stale bureaucracy, and we 
intend to find them all and put them into effect. Giving employers a 
choice, common sense regulation, common sense enforcement: that will be 
the new OSHA, the right way to protect the safety of people in the 
American workplace.
    But even as we take these steps, we have to recognize that there is 
a very different approach at work here in Washington. The leadership of 
the new Congress is mounting an assault on our ability to protect people 
in the workplace at all. Responding to the entreaties of powerful 
interest, they are ready to throw the baby out with the bath water and, 
in so doing, to put at risk the health and safety of millions of 
ordinary American workers. They're not trying to reform the system of 
worker protection as we are but instead to dismantle it and, therefore, 
to destroy our ability to pursue its fundamental purpose.
    The budget proposed in the Senate would cut in half the funding for 
worker health and safety, decimating enforcement, research, and even 
compliance assistance, something that I've found in my own personal 
experi- 

[[Page 841]]

ence to be the most important thing of all with employers of goodwill. 
The House budget would even eliminate outright the National Institute of 
Occupational Safety and Health. They say they don't want redtape, but 
this is an agency with no inspectors, the National Institute of 
Occupational Safety and Health. They say we should be guided by better 
scientific evidence in our work, and I agree. This agency exists solely 
to give us better evidence to guide our work. The Safety and Health 
Institute does important work, it doesn't cost a lot of money, and we 
ought to preserve it.
    The regulatory legislation moving through Congress, which was 
literally written by lobbyists who then wrote speeches for the Members 
to explain what it is they were introducing and supporting, would tie 
worker protection efforts up in knots. It would override every health 
and safety standard on the books and let special interest dictate the 
regulatory process. They have proposed freezing all Federal regulations 
and have gone after the worker protection standards with a little bit of 
extra gusto. They don't want rigorous reform. It looks to me like they 
want rigor mortis. [Laughter]
    Now, I am the last person in the world to stand up here and defend 
some dumb rule, regulation, or practice or people who say that people 
who are elected come and go; we'll be here in this agency forever; you 
do it our way or not at all. But we have proved, we have proved, that 
most Federal employees want to do the right thing, that they want the 
American people to do right and to do well. We have proved that we can 
change the culture of bureaucracy. And we're going to do more of it.
    So we should reform. We absolutely should. But we should not roll 
back our commitment to worker safety. Remember, there's still a lot of 
folks out there working in situations that are dangerous. And not every 
workplace can make--be made 100 percent safe. I know that. And workers 
have a responsibility to take care of their own safety and to be careful 
and to be diligent. I know that. But we have a public responsibility 
that all of us share as Americans to work for safer workplaces.
    If we take that seriously and we apply ourselves to the task in the 
way the Vice President and the Secretary of Labor have outlined today, 
if we follow the example of the fine OSHA leaders, business leaders, 
union leaders like those we recognized in Maine today, we can do what we 
need to do. We can do what we need to do and still pursue the public 
interest.
    We do not have to grow the American economy by going back to the 
time when we acted as if worker safety doesn't matter. It does matter. 
It matters a lot to people. And just because the Government has been 
slow on the uptake in the past, and every now and then somebody makes a 
mistake and overreaches, doesn't mean we can walk away from out 
fundamental public duty.
    So let's continue on this path. Let's change this thing. Let's make 
it work. Let's lift unnecessary burdens and keep making sure we're 
committed to the health and welfare of the American workers so we can do 
right and do well.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 12:48 p.m. at the Stromberg Sheet Metal 
Works, Inc. In his remarks, he referred to Assistant Secretary of Labor 
for Occupational Safety and Health Joseph Dear; Robert Gawne, CEO, 
Stromberg Sheet Metal Works, Inc., and his wife, Patricia; Senior Policy 
Advisor for the Vice President Elaine Kamarck; and A. D. ``Pete'' 
Correll, chairman and CEO, Georgia-Pacific Corp.