[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 15 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Pages 583-584]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
The President's Radio Address

April 8, 1995

    Good morning. I ran for President because I believe the American 
dream was at risk for millions of our fellow citizens. I wanted to grow 
the middle class, shrink the under class, create more opportunities for 
entrepreneurs to succeed, so that our economy would produce the American 
dream. I wanted to promote mainstream values of responsibility, work, 
family, and community. And I wanted to reform Government to make it 
smaller, less bureaucratic, put it back on the side of ordinary 
Americans.
    We're working at making progress on all these fronts--unemployment 
down, jobs up--real progress in giving people in the under class a 
chance to work their way into the middle class. But there's still a lot 
of challenges we face. There's no greater gap between mainstream 
American values and Government than the failed welfare system.
    Last night the Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, spoke eloquently 
about the need to reform the welfare system. And I ran for President 
saying that I would work to end welfare as we know it. This has been a 
big issue for me for long time. I've worked to move people from welfare 
to work for 15 years now. So the Speaker and I have a lot in common. We 
both want bold welfare reform. We both think that we need to make people 
leave welfare after a specific number of years. We both want to require 
welfare recipients to work to get benefits. We both want States to have 
a lot of flexibility to adopt their own programs.
    I've gone a long way toward doing that by letting 25 States adopt 
bold new reforms for their own welfare systems. And we both want tough 
steps to enforce child support. The welfare reform plan I sent to 
Congress last year included the toughest possible child support 
enforcement. And now the Speaker and his colleagues in the House have 
taken our child enforcement measures and put it into their bill, 
including our plan to ask States to deny driver's licenses and 
professional licenses to deadbeat parents.
    In spite of these similarities we still have two key differences I 
want to talk to you about. They relate to work and to children. First, 
cutting costs is the primary goal of the Republican welfare bill. By 
arbitrarily cutting future welfare costs the Republicans get money to 
pay for their tax cuts. Well, I agree we need to cut costs, but we also 
have to be sure that when people leave welfare they have the education, 
training, and skills they need to get jobs, not simply to be off welfare 
and turn to lives of crime or to remain in poverty.
    If we cut child care, how can we expect mothers to go to work? If we 
cut job training, how will people learn to work? If we cut job programs 
and these people can't find jobs in the private sector, how can we 
require them to work?
    My top priority is to get people off welfare and into jobs. I want 
to replace welfare with work, so people earn a paycheck, not a welfare 
check. To do that, we have to take some of the money we save and plow it 
into job training, education, and child care.
    I want tough welfare reform, but we've got to be practical. If we're 
going to make people on welfare work, we have to make it possible for 
them to work. If we're going to make people self-reliant, we have to 
make it pos- 

[[Page 584]]

sible for them to support themselves. We can be tough, but we've got to 
be practical.
    I want welfare reform that moves people from dependence to 
independence, from welfare to work. So my proposal is a welfare-to-work 
plan, not just a welfare plan that cuts welfare. So that's the first 
change I want to make in the Republican welfare proposal. Before I'll 
sign it into law it's got to have a stronger work component.
    Second, the House bill is too tough on children. It cuts off aid to 
children who are on welfare just because their mothers are young and 
unmarried. These children didn't choose to be born to single mothers; 
they didn't choose to be born on welfare; they didn't choose to be born 
to women who are teenagers. We ought to remember that a child is a 
child, a baby is a baby. Whether they're white, black, or brown, whether 
they're born in or out of wedlock, anybody anywhere is entitled to a 
chance and innocence if it's a baby. We simply shouldn't punish babies 
and children for their parents' mistakes.
    So we can be good to our children and give them a chance to have a 
better life because we're got a stake in that. Just think about it. 
Every child born in America, whether they're born to a welfare family or 
to a middle class family or to a wealthy family, is going to grow up and 
be a part of our future. The child may grow up to be in a university or 
be in jail or somewhere in between. But the chances are awful good that 
what happens to the child will be influenced by what happens to the 
babies in their earliest days and months and years.
    So let's don't punish these babies and children for their parents' 
errors. Instead, let's give them a chance to grow up with a good 
education and a head start, so they'll be independent, working citizens.
    So I say to Speaker Gingrich and to the leaders of the Senate and 
the House in both parties, let's work together to get this job done. 
Let's prove to the American people that we can reform welfare, really 
reform it, without letting this issue divide us. It is time to end 
welfare as we know it, to put people to work without punishing children.
    Thanks for listening.

Note: The address was recorded at 8 p.m. on April 7 in the Hilton Inn in 
Sacramento, CA, for broadcast at 10:06 a.m. on April 8.