[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 31, Number 4 (Monday, January 30, 1995)]
[Pages 125-126]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks and an Exchange With Reporters Prior to a Meeting With Welfare 
Recipients

January 27, 1995

O.J. Simpson Trial

    The President. Is everyone in? This is a big pool today.
    Q. The O.J. trial is not on----
    The President. The O.J. trial hasn't started yet today, has it? 
Thank goodness it's in California or you all wouldn't pay any attention 
to what we're doing. [Laughter]
    Q. Have you been watching it?
    The President. I've seen a little of it. I saw a little of the 
argument last night.

Welfare Reform and the Economy

    I think all of you know, as I said in my State of the Union, perhaps 
the most important legislative issue Congress will take up this year is 
welfare reform. And I strongly believe we have to end the welfare system 
as we know it. Tomorrow I'm having a working session with Members of the 
Congress, with representatives of State and local government.
    But I wanted to begin this process by meeting with four people here 
who made the decision to choose work over welfare. I thank these women 
for coming in to meet with me, and I thank them for the work they've 
done to make the most of their own lives.
    When we meet tomorrow, we need to be mindful of how this system has 
worked, what works about it, what doesn't work about it, what the human 
impact's going to be, and how we really can foster work and independence 
and good parenting. And that will be the focus of our discussion today 
and the focus of our discussion tomorrow.
    One other point I'd like to make is that today we had the economic 
report on 1994, and we see now that last year we had the strongest 
economic growth in 10 years and the best combined rates of high growth 
and low inflation in 30 years. So we're moving in the right direction--
or, 25 years. We're moving in the right direction.
    And as we take up these decisions in the Congress over the budget 
and over the things that we are going to do, I would say we have to keep 
in mind that the most important social program is a job. And the most 
important thing that we can do to get to the New Covenant of more 
opportunity and more responsibility is to make sure as we are working to 
legislate and to create more responsibility at the grassroots level, we 
also keep opportunity in mind. And so we've got to keep the economic 
recovery going. We've got to pass responsible welfare reform. And those 
are the two things that I want to emphasize today.
    Q. Mr. President, what worries you about some of the welfare 
remedies that are being proposed by Republicans in Congress?
    The President. Well, some of them seem to say that we should cut 
people off of assistance without regard to what will happen to their 
children and without regard to whether they will have an opportunity to 
get the skills they need to move into the work force. And I think that's 
the thing that bothers me most of all.
    The other thing I wanted to do is to make sure that as we give more 
responsibility to the States, which is something I strongly support--
we've given two dozen States permission to get out from under Federal 
rules and regulations to try their own remedies; no one of us has all 
the answers to this; nobody does, otherwise the problem would be 
solved--but I want to make sure that we do not do it in a way that 
strongly disadvantages some States and helps others. I think we have to 
be fair to all States. Not every State at every point in time in the 
future will have the same percentage of its citizens eligible for 
welfare.
    The third thing I want to point out is, I think it's important that 
we do not forget that a lot of people who go on public assistance will 
only do it one time in their lives and do it because they hit a bump in 
the road, they have a marriage that breaks up, they lose a job, they 
have some personal misfor- 

[[Page 126]]

tune. They're there for 4 or 5 months, 6 months, and then they get off, 
their lives are stabilized, it never happens again.
    I think as we try to deal with the problem of long-term welfare 
dependency, we shouldn't forget and we shouldn't do anything that unduly 
burdens the people that never were in danger of being long-term welfare 
dependent but do need some short-term help. Those are the three things 
that bother me most as we get ready to go into this debate.
    I think that there is a genuine consensus across party lines, 
regional lines, income lines, racial lines that we ought to promote work 
and education and responsible parenting. I just want to make sure we 
don't fall into those other traps.
    Q. Mr. President, what do you think of the balanced budget?
    Q. Would your plan cost more at the beginning, though?
    The President. The plan I presented last year cost somewhere in the 
beginning--I think we underestimated the savings. The more you invest in 
putting people to work, the quicker you will reduce long-term taxpayer 
costs. The more people are put into the work force, even if you have to 
spend some money to do it--for example, we gave Oregon permission to 
take the welfare checks and actually use it by giving it to employers as 
a wage supplement. They wanted to try it, and we said have at it. I'm 
going to be very interested to see whether that works. Maybe a lot of 
States will do that. The Government can't afford a lot of public service 
jobs. Maybe the answer is to let the welfare checks go as employer 
supplements, to pay those wage supplements.
    But the point is that however we do it, the more we focus on work 
and giving people a living wage and an opportunity to work, the better 
off we'll be. That's another good argument for raising the minimum wage.

Balanced Budget Amendment

    Q. Mr. President, what do you think of the House passing the 
Balanced Budget Amendment? Are you for it?
    The President. I'm glad they adopted the Stenholm amendment.
    Q. Are you?
    The President. Absolutely, it makes the bill much better. I still 
believe that if it's going to be presented to the country, they ought to 
tell the country what's involved--what's involved. Let's have--there's a 
right to know here. I'm all for open Government, and I think there's a 
right to know what is involved. Let the people know what is involved, 
both in the short run what will have to be cut and what, if any, 
downsides there are, what's going to happen when we get into a 
recession, how will that be impacted? The people need more information 
about this before the legislators vote on it. If it's going to be sent 
out there, there ought to be a cover sheet showing how it would be done.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 10:30 a.m. in the Oval Office at the White 
House. A tape was not available for verification of the content of these 
remarks.