[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 30, Number 32 (Monday, August 15, 1994)]
[Pages 1661-1663]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on Crime Legislation and an Exchange With Reporters

August 11, 1994

    The President. Ladies and gentlemen, under any circumstances I would 
be disappointed if the House of Representatives turned its back on the 
toughest and largest attack on crime in the history of our country, at a 
time when the American people say it is the most important issue to 
them. But it is especially disheartening to see 225 Members of the House 
participate in a procedural trick orchestrated by the National Rifle 
Association, then heavily, heavily pushed by the Republican leadership 
in the House, and designed with only one thing in mind, to put the 
protection of particular interests over the protection of ordinary 
Americans.
    I don't know how many people in the run up to this vote--of both 
parties, unfortunately--told me, ``I'll vote for that bill, but I just 
have to vote against this procedural bill.'' ``Oh, I'll vote for it if 
it ever gets to the floor, but I just have to vote against this rule,'' 
because of the assault weapons ban or because they had decided, many of 
them after the fact, that there was too much money in here for 
preventing crime and to give our children something to say yes to 
instead of something just to say no to, even though two-thirds of this 
money is for police and prisons and punishment.
    Well, tonight a majority of the House attempted to take the easy way 
out. But they have failed the American people. And now I say to them, 
the easy way out is not an option. Fear and violence, especially among 
our children, will still be there tonight when they go home to bed. So I 
want them to come back tomorrow and the day after that and the day after 
that and to keep coming back until we give the American people the 
essential elements of this crime bill, until we put 100,000 police on 
the street and take our children and the guns off the street with the 
assault weapons ban and with the ban on ownership of handguns by 
juveniles, until we make ``three strikes and you're out'' the law of the 
land.
    We have got to do these things. And yes, we have to both build more 
prisons and give our kids something to say yes to, not just something to 
say no to. The amazing thing is that this prevention money was supported 
by every major law enforcement organization in the United States, 
representing over a half a million police officers who know something 
about fighting crime and putting their lives on the line.
    Today's vote is a vote against all of them, those people in law 
enforcement who stand out day-in and day-out and try to make our streets 
safer. It's a vote against their organizations who pleaded for this 
bill, the sheriffs, the police chiefs, the prosecutors, the attorneys 
general, a vote against the teachers and the others who work to keep our 
kids safe and secure, a vote against the Democratic mayor of Chicago and 
the Republican mayors of New York and Los Angeles. It's a vote against 
the families of children like James Darby and Polly Klaas who have been 
killed.
    Now, we can do better than this. And I want the Congress and the 
House to go back to work tomorrow and figure out how to save the 
elements of this crime bill. This is about the American people. It is 
their number one concern. And the American people are not foolish enough 
to be conned into believing that people are really for doing something 
about crime, but they had to pull a political trick to keep the bill 
from being voted on.

[[Page 1662]]

Crime Legislation

    Q. Mr. President, where do you go from here? Some of the main 
supporters of the bill say it's dead.
    The President. Oh, I don't think so. But of course, that's what we 
were all worried about. We were afraid that this would be like Humpty 
Dumpty, you know. And of course, that's what they want, the people that 
are fighting against it. But they're going to be given a chance.
    You know, for the last few days, all they heard from were the 
special interests and people that had been stirred up by a lot of the 
disinformation that had been put out. But tonight I think they've got a 
lot of explaining to do, because we know--you all know--that there were 
a majority of votes in the House for this, and the bill still went down 
on the rule because they thought they could pull a political trick and 
satisfy particular pressures on them without aggravating the rank-and-
file citizens of this country. I think they're wrong. I think the people 
will figure it out.
    Q. But there were 58 Democrats, Mr. President----
    Q. Mr. President, are you saying that you will keep the Congress in 
session until this is done? Are you going to keep the Congress in 
session?
    The President. I don't think they ought to go home. You know, the 
people who are committing these crimes are not going to take a vacation. 
They're going to be out there working overtime.
    Q. Mr. President, there were 58 Democrats, including 10 members of 
the Black Caucus, one Republican member of the Black Caucus. What do you 
say to them? They went against you on this issue.
    The President. Well, I say first of all let's look at the whole 
thing. There were 20 fewer Democrats voting against the rule than those 
who voted against the assault weapons ban. So there were 20 Democrats, 
probably 30, who said, ``Okay, I lost that fight. But the safety of the 
people in my district is more important than my view on this particular 
issue and certainly more important than my killing this bill on a 
procedural vote.'' They were very brave. They stood up and took a lot of 
heat.
    Now, there were 10 members of the Black Caucus whose opposition to 
the death penalty was so strong that they could not overcome their 
personal opposition. At least they had a principled position. But almost 
3 times that many, including many who were disappointed because they 
didn't get what they wanted in that bill, still voted for it.
    There were 11 brave Republicans who weathered enormous pressure. But 
there were 38 who voted against the assault weapons ban, and there were 
65--65--who voted for the crime bill with about the same amount of 
prevention money in it when it passed as it has today. Now I hear them 
say, ``Well, there's just too much prevention money here. We're doing 
too much in these programs to help these kids who are in trouble.'' 
Well, all I know is when it passed the first time at about this same 
dollar amount, there were 65 Republican votes for it. But I can tell 
you, they were put under a lot of pressure.
    Now, they can figure out how to do this. I'm not in the Congress; 
I'm not a part of it. But they can figure out how to get this done. They 
know what the elements are. There is a majority now in both Houses for 
all of the elements of this crime bill. To let special interests use 
parliamentary maneuvers to undermine what is clearly the will of the 
majority of the American people and a majority of the Congress on each 
discreet element is a bad mistake, and I don't think the people will 
forget about it.
    Q. Mr. President----
    Q. Mr. President----
    The President. One at a time. One at a time. Wolf [Wolf Blitzer, 
Cable News Network].
    Q. Mr. President, on the issue of the specific complaints that the 
opposition made, that there was too much money--pork if you will--they 
claim on crime prevention and that the ban on 19 kinds of assault 
weapons, are you prepared to compromise on those two points, the crime 
prevention programs and the gun control, in order to get the more 
prisons, the 100,000 police, and everything else you want?
    The President. First of all, I believe that all of these elements 
can pass, and I believe that they will. Let's wait and see what they

[[Page 1663]]

have to say. There were--let me say again--there were 11 votes, 
Republican votes, for this rule today. There were 38 Republican votes 
for the assault weapons ban. There were 65 Republican votes for the 
crime bill with about the same dollars' worth of prevention programs we 
had. So I don't see how, when we're spending two-thirds of the money in 
this bill on prisons, police, and punishment, we can possibly walk away 
when we've got the toughest punishment that any Federal bill ever had--
``three strikes and you're out,'' tougher penalties for serious 
offenders, tougher penalties for serious juvenile offenders--how we can 
walk away from the prevention programs when the police have told us that 
that's what we have to do?
    Q. What's your response to those who will say that this is an 
enormous personal defeat for you?
    The President. I can say that I worked my heart out on it, and I did 
everything I could. And on this day, the NRA and the Republican 
leadership had their way. The American people have to decide whether 
they think this is about which politicians are winning and losing in 
Washington or about kids like James Darby and Polly Klaas who are still 
alive.
    I believe the American people will not like viewing this as some 
sort of political circus up here. I'm on their side, and I think we 
better see who's on what side. That is the only thing that matters, what 
happens to the American people.
    Did I lose tonight? You bet I did in the sense that I wanted it to 
pass. But what happens to me is not important. If everybody in America 
had the security I had, we wouldn't need a crime bill.
    Look at--what happens to me is not it. What matters is all these 
kids that are going to be out on the street tonight that could just get 
shot. That's what's important. And I think that in the end if that is 
felt in the heart of the Members of the House, we'll still get this 
crime bill.
    Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 6:15 p.m. in the Briefing Room at the White 
House.