[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 30, Number 26 (Monday, July 4, 1994)]
[Pages 1375-1379]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to the National Academy of Sciences

June 29, 1994

    Thank you. Now, the next time someone asks me--some irate, self-
proclaimed expert in these matters--asks me, why in the wide world did 
you ever appoint Tim Wirth at the State Department, I'll say, ``Well, I 
had to get Ted Turner up off the floor.'' [Laughter] ``Didn't have much 
to do with public policy; couldn't stand to see a man with all that 
energy prone for the rest of his life. Seemed like an incalculable waste 
of human potential.'' [Laughter]
    Thank you. Thank you, Ted, and thank you, Jane. When I was down in 
Atlanta the other day to do the global press conference--which is one of 
the most exciting experiences I have had as the President or, indeed, in 
my entire public life, and I loved meeting all the journalists from 
around the world and trying to answer their questions and commu- 

[[Page 1376]]

nicating with them. When it was over, I got a handwritten note from Jane 
Fonda that said, well, you did a pretty good job on that, but don't 
forget about population. [Laughter] It was more formal, more polite, but 
that is the distilled essence of the letter that I got. So for both of 
them, I thank them for being here, although I do believe being on a 
stream in Montana is a way of supporting sustainable development that 
all of us could appreciate.
    I want to thank, also, Dr. Bruce Alberts and the staff at the 
National Academy of Sciences; the Shorenstein Barone Center of the 
Kennedy School, and the Pew Global Stewardship Initiative for this 
event. And I do want to say a special word of thanks to Tim Wirth. All 
of you who care passionately about this issue know how well he has done, 
what a great advocate he has been for bringing the world's attention to 
the kinds of challenges that will command all of us for decades to come. 
It's not always easy, and it's now almost become trite to say that 
anyone who wants to truly change things has to be willing to be 
misunderstood. And sometimes I think Tim is competing with me for first 
in line on that subject. [Laughter] But the country is in your debt, 
sir, and we thank you very much.
    I've been trying to prepare to go to the G-7 meeting in Naples. And 
I've been working on this organization for the last, well, year and a 
half--as long as I've been in office--to try to first get them to focus 
on global growth in the short run, about what we can do in our nations 
and together, and then to think about what the world will look like in 
the next century and what we must do. And I must tell you, I am of two 
minds. I am so happy and proud to be going there, basically to say that 
what we agreed to do is working; in the near-term, it is clearly 
working.
    The United States has 40 percent of the gross domestic product of 
the G-7. But in the last year, we've had 75 percent of the growth, 
almost 100 percent of the jobs, twice the investment rate, twice the 
export increase rate, the highest rate of productivity growth. We've got 
the second lowest deficit; next year we'll have the lowest deficit of 
all of the G-7 countries. These things are heartening to me. And as a 
group, our economy is in the best shape it's been in in 4 years. There 
is a sense that we're working together and that our Nation is fortunate 
enough to lead the way.
    But when you look at the long-run trends that are going on around 
the world--you read articles like Robert Kaplan's article in the 
Atlantic a couple of months ago that some say it's too dour--still, if 
you really look at what is going on, you could visualize a world in 
which a few million of us live in such opulence we could all be starring 
on nighttime soaps and the rest of us look like we're in one of those 
Mel Gibson ``Road Warrior'' movies.
    And I was so gripped by many things that were in that article, and 
by the more academic treatment of the same subject by Professor Homer 
Dixon. And I keep trying to imagine what it's going to be like to bring 
children into this world in this country or that one or the other. That 
is really what we are forced to come to grips with. And when I think 
about it, my mind starts bursting in those ways that some people say are 
undisciplined, but I think are productive. [Laughter]
    If you look at the landscape of the future and you say, we have to 
strengthen the families of the globe; we have to encourage equitable and 
strong growth; we have to provide basic health care; we have to stop 
AIDS from spreading; we have to develop water supplies and improve 
agricultural yields and stem the flow of refugees and protect the 
environment, and on and on and on, it gives you a headache. And of 
course, on that list, you have to say, if you look at the numbers, you 
must reduce the rate of population growth.
    Tim was talking about Haiti. My daughter and I once were talking 
about Haiti a few months ago, and I was telling her about how her mother 
and I had gone to Haiti once many years ago, shortly after we married, 
and what sadness and hope I had seen there at the same time, and what 
had happened since then. And she said to me, ``I know all that, Dad, 
because I've seen aerial photographs from in space. And if you look at 
the island, you can see where the Dominican Republic ends and where 
Haiti begins. And there couldn't be all that environmental destruction 
without all those other problems you talked about.'' It was a stunning 
thing from

[[Page 1377]]

the perspective of an American school child that sort of wraps all this 
up.
    I say that to make this point: We have to be disciplined in saying, 
``Well, all right, how much time and how much money and how much energy 
have we got, and we have to order our priorities.'' But we cannot be 
naive enough to think that it is so easy to isolate one of these issues 
as opposed to another, that there is some silver bullet that solves the 
future of the world.
    If you look at the rate at which natural resources are disappearing 
and you look at the rate at which the gap between rich and poor is 
growing, if you look at the fact that the world's population has doubled 
since only 74 nations met in Rome 40 years ago, it is clear that we need 
a comprehensive approach to the world's future. We call it under the 
buzzword of ``sustainable development,'' I guess, but there is no way 
that we can approach tomorrow unless we at least are mindful of our 
common responsibilities in all these areas.
    During the 9 days of the upcoming Cairo conference, more than 2 
million people will enter our world. More than 2 million new babies will 
be born into a world in which one-third of our children are already 
hungry, 2 of every 5 people on Earth lack basic sanitation, and large 
parts of the world exist with only one doctor for every 35,000 or 40,000 
people. Reversing these policies will require innovation and commitment 
and a determination to do what can be done over a long period of time, 
while all of us around the world are busy with our own business within 
our borders. It will require us to be willing to think anew about the 
relationship of human development to what is going on in all of these 
nations, to cast aside a lot of our ideas in the past when it was always 
tempting to believe that there was one single thing we could do, some 
silver bullet, that would make everything all right.
    To bring about shared prosperity, as Professor Homer Dixon has 
written, the nations of the world simply must move forward on many 
fronts at one time. Reducing population growth without providing 
economic opportunity won't work. Without education, it's hard to imagine 
how basic health care will ever take hold. Ignored, these challenges 
will continue to divide people from one another. We simply have to solve 
these problems together, both the problems together and together as the 
people of the world.
    I'm really proud of the fact that the G-7 has agreed to address some 
of these issues in a serious way this week in Naples. We're going to 
talk about what we can do within the G-7 to promote not just growth but 
more jobs, because a lot of the wealthy countries are finding they can't 
create jobs even when they grow their economy. And then, when they can't 
do that, they lose the constituency at home to engage the rest of the 
world.
    We're going to talk about how we build an economic infrastructure 
for the 21st century. What's this new world trade organization that we 
create with GATT going to look like? And what should the World Bank and 
the IMF do? We're also going to talk about how we can help economies in 
transition, like the states of the former Soviet Union, and what we can 
do with the economies that are not in transition or, if anything, are 
going the wrong way, to address our common responsibilities.
    This is quite a unique thing, really, for the world's advanced 
nations. And I'm quite pleased that, with all the economic problems that 
exist in many of these countries, they are willing to have a serious 
look at where we should be 10 or 20 years from now, far beyond the 
election prospects of all the world leaders who will be there.
    As we head for the Cairo conference, I think that same approach has 
to guide us. The policies we promote must be based on enduring values, 
promoting stronger families, having more responsibility from individual 
citizens, respecting human rights, deepening the bonds of community. 
Here at home and around the globe, that's where the future lies, 
beginning with our families. When they're whole and they function, 
families nurture and care for us. They provide role models. They 
communicate values and enable people to live together in peace and to 
work together for common objectives. Therefore, that is the most 
important thing we can do.
    Since the beginning of this administration, we have worked to 
promote policies that would permit families to grow in strength at home 
and abroad. I reversed the so-called

[[Page 1378]]

Mexico City policy because I thought that doctors and medical workers 
around the world should be able to really work on family planning and 
provide a full range of family planning information.
    Since then, we have increased by about 50 percent, at a very tough 
budget time, the Agency for International Development's budget for 
international family planning and support services. To bolster families 
here at home, we passed a big increase in the earned-income tax credit 
to help keep 15 million working families off welfare, out of poverty, 
and in the work force. We increased Head Start availability and 
nutrition programs to hundreds of thousands of children, cracked down on 
delinquent child support payments, increased immunization funds so that 
we can increase by literally more than a million the number of children 
who are immunized. We're working to reduce out-of-wedlock and teen 
births.
    Through the Family and Medical Leave Act, we're working to make it 
possible for people to be successful workers and successful parents, a 
big issue everywhere in the world now, where more and more parents must 
work. In any society which forces people to choose, we are doomed to 
failure. If people have no option to work and we all need people to 
continue to bear children, surely all of our parents must be successful 
workers, and our workers must be able to succeed as parents.
    Our population policy is rooted in the idea that the family should 
be at the center of all of our objectives. Therefore, there must be a 
support for the concept of responsibility of parents to their children, 
of men and women to one another, and of our current generation to future 
generations.
    Progress brings freedom; freedom requires more disciplined 
responsibility. And we must teach our young people to choose wisely and 
tell them that their choices must include abstinence. Our policy has 
always been rooted in the ethical principles of compassion and justice 
and respect for human rights. We have supported every individual's 
dignity and worth. And we will continue to oppose and to condemn all 
forms of coercion in family planning.
    Helping to translate these principles into reality is the charge 
that the Vice President will take to Cairo in September. No one is 
better suited to this task than he is. He has shown his commitment to 
these long-term challenges, and he has been thinking in large ways about 
them long before they were politically unpopular or even the source of 
much current discussion.
    In Cairo, we'll join the international community in pursuing a new 
plan of action to attack the population problem as part of the larger 
issue of sustainable development. At the top of our agenda will be 
active support for efforts to invest in the women of the world. Maybe 
over the long run, maybe the most important thing that Cairo policy will 
call for is that every nation make an effort to educate its children on 
an equal basis, to put an end to the widespread practice of withdrawing 
girls from school and forcing them to go to work before boys do. To 
ensure that nations can develop at a more rapid pace, it will call on 
each of us to recognize women's work and development and to engage them 
fully in the work force. It will help to give women the full rights of 
citizenship and to end discrimination which exists still nearly 
everywhere and slows progress wherever it exists.
    At Cairo, the United States will also join the international 
community in launching new, high-quality, voluntary family planning and 
reproductive health programs. Our goal is to make these programs 
available to every citizen in the world by early in the next century. 
Parents must have the right to decide freely and responsibly the number 
and spacing of their children.
    Now, I want to be clear about this. Contrary to some assertions, we 
do not support abortion as a method of family planning. We respect, 
however, the diversity of national laws, except we do oppose coercion 
wherever it exists. Our own policy in the United States is that this 
should be a matter of personal choice, not public dictation and, as I 
have said many times, that abortion should be safe, legal, and rare. In 
other countries where it does exist, we believe safety is an important 
issue. And if you look at the mortality figures, it is hard to turn away 
from that issue. We also believe that providing women with the

[[Page 1379]]

means to prevent unwanted pregnancy will do more than anything else to 
reduce abortion.
    Finally, let me say, we must take to Cairo the same basic commitment 
to provide health care for every citizen of the world that we have 
brought to the public debate here in America. I must say that there is 
less disagreement among the representatives of the 174 countries going 
to Cairo than there is among the 535 Members of Congress. Maybe we can 
bring the spirit back home.
    Experience shows that investing in maternal health, prenatal 
services, preventive care for children does not only save lives, it 
eventually gives people the confidence they need to know that their 
children will survive. And that changes all kinds of attitudes that 
affect the way children are raised. Every country has committed itself 
to improving the health of women and children. And every one that has 
really done that has seen a decline in population growth and a rise in 
prosperity.
    The Cairo conference, therefore, can do a great deal to advance our 
vision of sustainable development and stabilized population growth, to 
help us fulfill a vision of a world of intact families in which every 
member is cherished; a world that has the wisdom and the strength to 
tackle challenges head on, instead of to talk about them and use words 
to divide people so they don't really address them; a world that will 
lead to equal opportunity and shared prosperity.
    When President Roosevelt died in 1945, there was a typed manuscript 
of his last speech which was found with just a single sentence written 
in his own hand. This was the last sentence of the last speech that 
Franklin Roosevelt had written, one that he never got to give. His 
handwritten sentence said, ``The only limit to our realization of 
tomorrow will be our doubts of today. Let us move forward with strong 
and active faith.'' In the face of so many seemingly intractable 
problems, it is certainly tempting to let those doubts take control. But 
I think those of you here tonight believe as I do that we can, instead, 
search for and find solutions that will help generations yet to come. 
President Roosevelt governed at a time when doubt was a luxury the 
American people could not afford. I say to you tonight, doubt is a 
luxury the world can no longer afford.
    I commend you for your compassion and your commitment. I urge you to 
turn this faith into action and to help me to do my job to do the same.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 9:06 p.m. in the Benjamin Franklin Room at 
the State Department. In his remarks, he referred to Ted Turner, 
president and chairman of the board, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., 
and his wife, actress Jane Fonda; and Bruce Alberts, president, National 
Academy of Sciences. A tape was not available for verification of the 
content of these remarks.