[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 30, Number 25 (Monday, June 27, 1994)]
[Pages 1309-1316]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to the Business Roundtable

June 21, 1994

    Thank you very much, John. I'm trying to fix this lectern, if you're 
wondering what I'm doing up here. I'm proving that I don't have 
sufficient mechanical skills. [Laughter]
    I want to thank John for his leadership as the chairman of this 
distinguished group and welcome the incoming chair, John Snow, with whom 
I just shared a few words about some of our common interests in Europe. 
I'd also like to say a special word of appreciation to two of your 
members for working on issues that we share a common concern about, Joe 
Gorman, who's chairing your session on education, and Larry Perlman, 
who's chairing the work force development section and discussing the 
reemployment act that he's helping us to work on and about which I wish 
to talk today. I want to thank the Business Roundtable for sharing a 
belief with me and with our administration that we have to move 
aggressively to embrace the challenges of the global economy. That, 
after all, is why we worked hard on the North American Free Trade 
Agreement and why we are working together to pass the GATT agreement.
    I also want to thank you for our common understanding of a simple 
but powerful truth, which is that even as we lower barriers to trade 
around the world, we must work hard to lift our people up here at home 
so that they can compete and win and carry on their work and build their 
lives. Investing in our people's God-given potential is good economics. 
You know that, and I do. It pays off in higher productivity, more 
incomes, a competitive edge for our companies and our country in the 
global marketplace. We talk about this all the time in the White House. 
I see my Chief of Staff, Mr. McLarty, and our Economic Adviser, Mr. 
Rubin; the Deputy Treasury Secretary, Mr. Altman, is here. There may be 
others here from the administration. These are things that we say all 
the time in our meetings. I appreciate the work that you did in helping 
us to pass the Goals 2000 legislation, one of the most important 
education reforms in a generation in this country. When we work 
together, we can do things that help America prepare for the future.
    I think today is an especially appropriate day for me to be here, 
speaking with you about how we can better prepare our country for 
change. Fifty years ago tomorrow, as the Allied armies advanced from the 
beaches of Normandy, President Roosevelt signed a bill that was called 
the Serviceman's Readjustment Act, better known as the GI bill of 
rights. Just as D-Day was the greatest military action in history, the 
GI bill arguably was the greatest investment in our people

[[Page 1310]]

in American history. Its legacy is the world's largest middle class, the 
world's strongest economy. Its lesson is, in large measure, the mission 
of our administration: If you give people a chance to help themselves, 
they'll do it and they'll do extraordinary things.
    Before World War II, our country often failed to prepare returning 
veterans after wars. We gave them pensions and bonuses, but they had 
nothing left to build their future with. That's why jobless and 
despairing veterans of World War I actually marched on Washington in 
1932, why President Roosevelt declared that the GI bill, quote, ``gave 
emphatic notice to the men and women of our Armed Forces that the 
American people do not intend to let them down.''
    We know why the GI bill didn't let them down. It relied on American 
values of work and responsibility. It offered a hand up, not a handout. 
The veterans of World War I, by contrast, got a handout. To be sure, one 
they earned and one the country was grateful for, but they got cash and 
a train ticket home. But the veterans of World War II got a ticket to 
the future instead. Uncle Sam helped them to go to college, to get job 
training, to finance homes and businesses of their own. But it was up to 
them to seize the opportunities. They did, and all of us are the better.
    The GI bill helped 8 million returning veterans begin that journey. 
They flooded colleges and trade schools: 450,000 veterans became 
engineers; 360,000 became school teachers; 240,000 became accountants; 
180,000 became doctors and nurses; 150,000 became scientists. Millions 
more bought homes or built businesses. Maybe some of them are among you 
who invited me here to be with you today.
    We really can't even begin to calculate how much our Nation was 
enriched by the GI bill, how many communities sprung up, how many 
companies prospered, how many families earned their share of the 
American dream. This much we do know: Together all those people built 
the American middle class that has been the bulwark of our prosperity 
since World War II.
    Fifty years after the signing of the GI bill, the world's changed a 
lot. Our economy has clearly changed. But what it takes for our people 
to meet the challenges of today and tomorrow has not changed. Now as 
then, we stand at a pivot point in history. In the five decades between, 
our country mustered another great international commitment, the 
commitment to stand strong in the cold war. That succeeded. Now we see a 
world economy taking shape where investment and information flow rapidly 
across national borders. Competition for jobs and incomes is 
international and highly intense. And once again, we are being called 
upon to decide our future.
    I have a vision, a mission, a strategy for how I believe all this 
should take place; how we can move forward in the 21st century; what the 
partnership between Government and business ought to be; what the whole 
atmospherics in this country, the feeling about our mission ought to be. 
I must say, it doesn't fit very well into the established categories of 
left and right and liberal and conservative and Democratic and 
Republican. And I feel frustrated sometimes at my ability to pierce the 
atmosphere that prevails here. But it is clear to me that if we are 
going to make a future that is consistent with our values, we're going 
to have to do it with a different approach.
    Still, it has to be built on the spirit that animated the GI bill: 
Give Americans the chance to make their own lives in this fast-changing 
world so the changes can be their friends and not their enemies. To do 
it we have to move on many fronts. We have to create an environment 
where business can create new jobs and new growth. We have to open 
markets for our goods and services, for our companies and our workers. 
We have to invest in our people's work and security.
    When I assumed this office, the deficit had been increasing 
exponentially for 12 years; trade agreements were stalled; job growth 
was agonizingly slow; consumer confidence was shaky. We were actually 
facing the prospect that, for the first time, a generation of Americans 
would grow up to a future that was more limited than that which their 
parents enjoyed.
    I adopted a strategy to, first, work on expanding the economy and 
getting our own economic house in order; second, to make Government work 
for ordinary citizens and

[[Page 1311]]

end gridlock; third, to empower people and strengthen communities; and 
fourth, to secure our role in the world, defending our fundamental 
security interests, expanding our economic interests, promoting 
democracy, human rights, and limiting the spread of destructive chaos 
arising out of ethnic and other hatreds.
    The atmosphere, frankly, here has been more hostile to change than I 
had imagined it would be. The American people desperately wanted change 
but were often unwilling to listen to the complex debates and make the 
difficult decisions that are inherent in it. And this town still is, in 
my judgment, too partisan, too negative, too obsessed with process and 
conflict instead of results and progress, too interested in blame, and 
too little interested in responsibility.
    Nonetheless, we have been able to put together an economic strategy 
for putting our house in order, making hard decisions that will make it 
possible next year, for the first time since Truman was President, to 
have 3 years in a row of deficit reduction, eliminating over 100 
Government programs outright, cutting 200 others, cutting domestic 
discretionary spending--that's everything besides Social Security, 
Medicare, and Medicaid, the other entitlements--cutting discretionary 
spending on the domestic side, not just defense, for the first time in 
25 years.
    All of that will enable us to reduce the deficit 3 years in a row 
for the first time since the Truman Presidency. It means we've had to 
slash the Federal Government, to bring more responsibility into the 
budgeting process. We completed the budget by the May 15 deadline for 2 
years in a row for the first time in 17 years.
    We are making progress. We've adopted a very aggressive attitude on 
trade, which you've been a part of, as all of you know: NAFTA, GATT, the 
APEC meetings--I'm going to a second one in Indonesia this fall--a 
hemispheric summit at the end of the year with all the leaders of the 
Latin American democracies. And 33 of the 35 countries in Latin America, 
along with the United States, are now headed by elected governmental 
officials.
    We've now got the first investment-led, low-inflation-based economic 
recovery since the early 1960's. In addition to that, we have worked 
hard to make Government work. With the reinventing Government program 
that the Vice President has spearheaded, at the end of 5 years, we will 
have a Federal bureaucracy that has 250,000 fewer Federal employees and 
is under 2 million in civilian workers for the first time since the 
Kennedy Presidency.
    We have Federal agencies that are working again in fundamental ways 
to engage the business community in the growth of the economy all around 
the world. The Export-Import Bank--I see Mr. Brody over there. I don't 
know how many businessmen have come up to me and said, ``For the first 
time in my life, I travel overseas and I see the State Department and 
the Commerce Department actually working together trying to promote 
American business interests. And I appreciate it.''
    The Small Business Administration has been virtually revolutionized 
in the way it works with small businesses. You can now apply for a loan 
on a one-page form. People talk to me everywhere I go in America about 
the emergency management agency, FEMA, of the Federal Government, saying 
it finally has become the shining light of what a Government ought to be 
when people are in trouble instead of just a pain in the neck that has 
to be dealt with. We are trying to make Government work.
    The Congress has before it major campaign finance reform and lobby 
reform legislation that has passed both Houses of the Congress, awaiting 
now a conference that will iron out the differences and send that to me 
for signature.
    Maybe most important of all, in spite of everything, gridlock is 
being dealt with. Last year, the Congress passed the Brady bill and the 
family leave bill after 7 years of gridlock. We got agreement among the 
great nations on GATT after 7 years of debate. This year the Congress is 
going to pass a crime bill after 6 years of gridlock, one that will be 
the most sweeping anticrime legislation ever adopted by the Congress: 
100,000 more police officers on our streets, tougher punishment, 
innovative prevention programs, a ban on assault weapons that people 
said could

[[Page 1312]]

never be passed over the opposition of the NRA.
    And at the end of last year, according to nonpartisan sources, we 
had the best first year in working with Congress of any Presidency since 
the end of World War II, except the Eisenhower first year and President 
Johnson's first year, which were about the same. And if I may be 
forgiven a little bit of bragging rights, I think the things we tried to 
do and the atmosphere in which we tried to do them were far more 
difficult.
    So we are trying to make Government work. I say that to say that, 
yes, there have been some good results. And a lot of them are because 
you did a lot of work in the 1980's and the early nineties to become 
more productive and to be more competitive. And in the first 16 months 
of this administration, over 3 million new jobs in the private sector 
came into this economy, 2\1/2\ times as many than in the previous 4 
years alone. We had, the first quarter of this year, the first time in 
well over a decade when there was no bank failure in a quarter. There 
were more incorporations of new businesses than at any time since World 
War II in 1993.
    But I will say again, we can do these things, and unless we also 
empower our people to deal with the challenges of the global economy, as 
we did with the GI bill, we're going to have a tough time.
    With your help and support, a lot of things have already been done. 
A bigger and better Head Start program will improve the quality of the 
program and serve 40,000 more children this year and 90,000 more 
children next year than were being served previously. Goals 2000 will 
link grassroots reform with world-class standards for our public 
schools, the first time we have ever had any national standards for 
achievement.
    The School-to-Work Opportunities Act will help high school students 
learn real skills and provide America with better trained, higher 
skilled workers. Student loan reforms, which the Secretary of Education, 
who's here, has done so much to administer, will make it possible for 20 
million American students to repay their loans--some $50 billion of 
them--on more favorable terms and make it possible for students in the 
future to borrow money to go to college at lower interest rates and 
better repayment terms. But it will make it harder for them to avoid 
paying their bills.
    These things are very hopeful signs. The national service program, 
AmeriCorps, will make it possible for 20,000 young people to serve their 
country at the grassroots level and earn money to go to college this 
year; the year after next, 100,000 young Americans doing that. The Peace 
Corps in its largest year had 16,000 Americans serving. This national 
service program literally has the potential to change the way our young 
people think about themselves, their country, and their role as 
citizens.
    So many of you have helped us on all these issues. And this summer, 
we're going to have two or three more things that I want to ask you to 
help us on. First of all, as I go to the G-7 conference, there will be a 
lot of discussion about GATT. Everybody that I know sort of treats GATT 
as if it's already done. But as you know, the Congress has not yet 
passed the enabling legislation. I will submit that legislation 
implementing the agreement this summer. We have worked very, very hard 
on meeting the strict budget rules to find a way to pay for GATT. You 
and I know GATT will make the Government money, but under our budget 
rules, we have to pretend that it's going to cost us money because we're 
getting rid of tariffs.
    I want to urge you in the strongest possible terms: Do everything 
you can to persuade the Congress to give this high priority, to pass it 
with as little controversy and as little delay as possible, and to move 
on it this year. Only the United States, of all our trading partners, 
has to go through the budget hoops we do to pass GATT. All of our 
trading partners look at me and say, ``You're the person that got us all 
together and made us do this last year. How can you not ratify it?'' We 
need your help, and we must do it this year, not next year.
    Secondly, I ask for your help to pass the reemployment act which 
will change the whole way our unemployment system works. It will turn a 
bewildering array of training programs into a system where workers who 
lose their jobs can present themselves at a one-stop service center and 
get the guidance, the training opportunities, and the informa- 

[[Page 1313]]

tion they need for real jobs in the private sector. The boards that 
supervise these programs will be controlled by people who know most 
about the opportunities, the private sector. And I want Congress to 
enact that this year. This is very, very important.
    The average person does not go back to the job from which he or she 
is laid off, but the unemployment system is still built on the premise 
that they do. The consequence of that is that employers pay too much in 
unemployment for people to just hang around on the system instead of 
prepare to take new jobs, and employees spend too much time doing just 
that instead of moving more quickly into a new economy. We can change 
this, but we need to do it this year.
    Let me finally say that, on this issue, a lot of you have expressed 
support to me personally for the welfare reform efforts. Whether that 
can pass this year or not depends upon how much fire it catches in 
Congress and how much controversy we can avoid in how to fund it. But we 
have to change the culture of welfare. And this program that I have 
presented to Congress, along with the others that have been presented, 
go right at the heart of parents who don't pay child support they owe, 
to the heart of the teen pregnancy problem, to the heart of requiring 
people to work once they have the skills to do so. And I hope you will 
continue to support that.
    Now, despite all these efforts, I have to tell you that I do not 
believe that the American people, as individuals, will be able to 
embrace the changes of the global economy as successful workers unless 
and until we address the health care crisis.
    This goes to the heart of our debate on all of the other things in 
the strategy I outlined. It goes to the heart of whether we can get our 
own economic house in order. It goes to the heart of whether we can make 
Government work for ordinary people. It goes to the heart of whether we 
can empower people to view change as a friend instead of an enemy. 
Unless we can provide coverage for every American in a reform system 
which focuses on both quality and control of costs, the deficit will 
grow, your costs will continue to grow and undermine productivity, and 
more and more Americans will lose their coverage or be at risk.
    Let me briefly discuss this whole thing from my point of view, from 
your point of view, and from the American citizen's point of view, from 
a worker's point of view.
    From my point of view, as the President in charge of the budget, 
I've worked hard to get this deficit down for 3 years in a row for the 
first time since Truman was President. I have done things that people 
who say they're more conservative than me talk about but don't do. We're 
eliminating over 100 Government programs. We're cutting 200 others. 
We're reducing discretionary spending for the first time in 25 years and 
still with the discipline to increase investment in education and new 
technologies and training. We have reduced defense all we can reduce it. 
And I think we are right at the margin, and we should not reduce it any 
more, given the challenges we face in this economy.
    A lot of you will probably be called to testify or to support the 
work of Senator Kerrey, Senator Danforth, and others in this 
entitlements commission, because you know that the only thing that is 
increasing our deficit now is entitlements. But keep in mind, when you 
strip all that away, some of the entitlements are going down; Social 
Security is going up only with the rate of inflation and is roughly the 
same percentage of our GDP it was 20 years ago. The only part of the 
entitlements going up much more rapidly than inflation are Medicare and 
Medicaid, the Government's programs for the elderly and the poor.
    And I can tell you that unless we can bring them in line with 
inflation, we will be forced to either let the deficit go up again, 
raise taxes more than we should, or cut our investment in public 
investment, in things you support, to a dangerously low level in a 
global economy. So that's what it looks like from my point of view, just 
from a budget perspective.
    From your point of view, you know already that the Government does 
not reimburse Medicare and Medicaid providers at 100 percent of cost, so 
the costs are being shifted to you. The other people who are shifting 
costs to you are businesses and employers who do not have health 
insurance but who get health care. They are shifting the cost to you.

[[Page 1314]]

    Now, if our deficit goes up, and we have to bring the deficit down, 
and we cut Medicare and Medicaid without fundamental reform, we're going 
to shift more cost to you. And you will be put in the position of paying 
more or covering less. And keep in mind, in the last 3 years, 3 million 
American workers have lost their health insurance. There are 3 million 
more Americans without health coverage today than there were 3 years 
ago. You are also paying for them in cost shifting.
    So unless we have comprehensive reform, you will be put in the 
position of someday coming to the end of how much you can do managing 
your health care costs on your own--which you've done a very good job 
of, almost all of you. And you will be facing the cost shift coming at 
you from the Federal Government and from the increasing numbers of 
employers who don't provide any coverage.
    Now, the third and the most important thing of all: What does this 
look like if you're out there working in this country, and you hadn't 
had much of a pay increase in the last 10 years, but you know that your 
country's becoming more competitive, and you're excited about the 21st 
century, and you know that you're raising children who will have to 
change jobs eight times in a lifetime? What are you going to do?
    If you're a man and you have a premature heart attack, or your wife 
gets breast cancer, your kid develops some strange disease, and you have 
a preexisting condition, and you're being told, ``It's a brave new world 
out there. Don't worry if you have to change jobs. Just get some new 
retraining. You'll do fine.'' And then it turns out nobody wants to hire 
you because you've got a preexisting condition.
    Oh, I know there are those who say we can just legislate these 
things. We'll just legislate the insurance reforms, say you can't 
discriminate against anybody, and it will be fixed. Look at the study 
that many of my adversaries in the Congress on this issue keep citing, 
the Lewin VHI study. They say that all you can get out of insurance 
reforms is coverage in the short run for 2.2 million more people. You 
look at the experience of New York that tried to mandate insurance 
reforms alone. What happens? A lot of people's insurance goes up, and a 
lot more people opt out of the system.
    I say, if you look at the rest of the world and you look at us, we 
have 81 million Americans out of a population of only 255 million, 81 
million of us live in families with people who have preexisting 
conditions. But they all still need to be able to change work seven 
times in a lifetime.
    Thirty-nine million of us do not have health insurance. There is no 
compelling evidence that we can both have quality and cost control and 
stop cost-shifting in the absence of covering everyone. There is no 
compelling evidence. The Lewin VHI study, so often cited by those who 
say, ``Well, we could get 91 percent coverage in America, up from 83 
percent, covering 97 percent of the cost of health care if only we did 
this stuff, which doesn't require employer mandates or of some other 
universal coverage''--that's being talked about. But if you notice, 
there's not been a bill really pushing that. Why? Because when you strip 
it away, you see that it costs literally hundreds of billions of dollars 
over the next 5 or 6 years to finance that in massive subsidies which 
basically benefit poor people, most of whom are not working, some of 
whom are working, and does nothing for middle-class workers. Which means 
to do that instead of an employer mandate, we would have to go back and 
raise the heck out of everybody's taxes, which we are not about to do. 
At that level it would not be fair.
    Now, how is it that every other advanced country in the world and 
all of our competitors--we're only too happy to learn from our 
competitors in every other way, and we're very proud when we beat our 
competitors. And I don't know how many of you have told me personally, 
``We're better now than anybody else in the world at what we do. And we 
went through all kinds of agonies in the eighties, and we faced all 
these challenges, and now we're better than our competitors.''
    Well, our competitors, not a single, solitary one of them spends 
more than 10 percent of GDP on health care. We spend 14, and we're the 
only people that can't figure out how to cover everybody. Now, I refuse 
to declare defeat. Why should we jump in the tank?

[[Page 1315]]

    I heard the messages about what people didn't like about our 
original proposal: Don't put restrictions on experimental drugs; don't 
make businesses go into alliances if they don't want to, let it be 
voluntary, people know their own interests; let multistate businesses 
have an approach which makes sense for all their employers. We're making 
the changes that we heard people complain about. Those changes are being 
made. We know we needed to make some changes. But if you remember, when 
I offered my health care plan, I said, ``This is not the end-all and be-
all. It's the beginning of a debate.'' But what we need to decide is 
whether we're going to walk away from this session of Congress without 
the debate.
    Harry Truman said 50 years ago, Americans will never be secure 
unless we did something about health care. Everybody thinks of Harry 
Truman now as the fount of all wisdom. I come from a family that liked 
him when he was unpopular. [Laughter] But most Americans didn't like him 
too much at the time. He kept telling them uncomfortable truths. He was 
right 50 years ago, and it's still true. So, yes, we need to make some 
changes in the original proposal I made. We put them out there. But what 
we need is a quick, honest, forthright debate. We need to deal with this 
issue this year because until we do, we will continue to spend a higher 
percentage on health care than our competitors; you will continue to 
have costs shifted to you; your Government will continue to face the 
agonizing choice of continuing to spend more and more of your tax money 
on entitlements, less on investment, and still increasing the deficit 
and still shifting costs to you.
    So, I ask you, enter the debate and just tell people what you have 
to do every day in your own businesses. You get a real hard decision; if 
you don't want the thing to collapse, you can't walk away. And almost 
always, you make a decision that is less than perfect but is better than 
making no decision.
    So I ask you, help me pass the reemployment bill. Help us pass GATT. 
Help us pass welfare reform. But don't walk away from health care. The 
numbers are big; they're enormous. And we can't tell an average 
American, can't tell a mother on welfare, ``Get off of welfare and take 
a job so you can lose your children's health insurance and start paying 
taxes for people to pay for their kids' health care who stayed on 
welfare.'' We can't tell a worker, ``Give up your job security and find 
a new security in your mind, in your ability to learn and change,'' if 
your illness or the illness of someone in your family will put you out 
of the job market. We must not ask people to choose between being good 
parents and good workers. We cannot ask people to risk their children's 
health to participate in the global economy. And most importantly, we 
can't just keep working with a system that is fundamentally flawed that 
we can fix. We can look around the world; we know there are all kinds of 
fixes here. We may have to do more for small business; I'm willing to do 
that. We may have to do more, and we should, to make the thing less 
regulatory; I've already made a lot of those changes. But let us not 
walk away.
    When I spoke at Normandy a couple of weeks ago, in the greatest 
honor of my Presidency, to represent our country in commemorating the 
50th anniversary of D-Day, the thing that overwhelmed me about that was 
that people did what they had to do because there was no option, and 
they measured up and literally saved the world. And that in that moment, 
there was no option to be cynical. There was no luxury available for 
people to avoid the decisions before them, and they did not have the 
option to be cynical.
    Today, I tell you, we have fundamental decisions to make about what 
kind of people we are going to be into the future. Walking away is an 
option that's not really there. Being cynical or negative is always an 
option that's there, but it's something we pay a terrible price for. 
This country can do what we have to do. We have to be what the people 
that led the D-Day invasion were; they were called pathfinders, the 
people that went first. That's what we're being asked to do.
    You live in an age which glorifies commerce and success and 
international trade more than any other in the lifetime of anybody in 
this room. Therefore, you have enormous responsibilities. And you have 
to light the path to the future in the way that the

[[Page 1316]]

GI bill did 50 years ago. We can do it. We can do it if we make the 
right choices.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 12:55 p.m. in the Grand Ballroom at the 
J.W. Marriott Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to John Ong, outgoing 
chair, and John Snow, incoming chair, Business Roundtable.