[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 30, Number 18 (Monday, May 9, 1994)]
[Pages 953-957]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to Americans With Disabilities

May 2, 1994

    Well, thank you, Stephanie and Denise, and thank you all for being 
here. I want to thank ADAPT; the National Council for Independent 
Living; the Consortium of Citizens With Disabilities; recognize my good 
friend Tony Coelho; Marca Bristo, the Chair of the National Council on 
Disabilities, pend- 

[[Page 954]]

ing confirmation. I'm honored to be given this book of signatures of 
genuine American heroes who are fighting every day for their own rights 
and for genuine health care reform for all Americans. I want to say a 
special word of thanks to Justin Dart, who has risen above partisanship 
to provide an example for all of us about what it really means to keep 
fighting the good fight--not only for Americans with disabilities. This 
is a fight for all Americans who are touched by these problems. And I 
want to say a special word of thanks to Kate Miles and her family for 
being here today, for her determination, her courage, her love, and for 
her ability to get up here and tell their very moving personal story.
    I say this to make a special point. The issues affecting Americans 
with disabilities--they say, ``Well, there are 49 million Americans with 
some sort of disability, and there are 255 million of us total.'' But if 
you consider all the family members of all of the Americans with 
disabilities, you're getting very close to a majority of us who would be 
affected in a positive way by the provisions of the health security act 
that help Americans with disabilities, just those provisions. And in a 
very, moving and human way, Kate Miles and Robert and their children--
husbands, all the families they stand for all across America, they have 
reminded us what this is all about.
    The theme of your rally today is ``Bridge to Freedom,'' and I want 
to talk a little about that. The Americans with disability law was a 
bridge to freedom. But it's only part of the equation. It's only part of 
the equation. What about economic freedom? How many Americans with 
disabilities are denied the chance to do work they are able to do not 
because of discrimination per se but because of the way the health care 
system works. This is not just a health care issue, it's a work issue. 
How much better off would the rest of us be if every American with a 
disability who was willing to work, could work because of changes in the 
health care system? It's self-defeating to say to the Americans with 
disabilities, ``You can have health benefits, but only if you spend 
yourself into poverty, and above all, you must not work.''
    Forty-nine million Americans with disabilities, 24 million with 
severe disabilities, half with no private health insurance--the health 
care system is failing Americans with disabilities, but in so doing is 
failing us all, is making us less productive than we would otherwise be, 
less strong than we would otherwise be. It is costing more tax dollars 
and robbing us of taxes that would come to America's treasury, not from 
higher tax rates but from more Americans working and paying taxes in the 
ordinary course of their lives. We had better fix it now.
    After all of the incredible debates, after all of the amazing ads 
where--and Justin just referred to one of them--you know, these ads 
where they say--somebody calls up and says, ``Well, we'll have to call 
the Government and see if you can get your doctor,'' all these 
incredibly bogus ads. We had better do this now. We had better do this 
now. Otherwise, the forces of disinformation, organized disinformation, 
will think that the American people actually prefer to have the most 
expensive, wasteful, bureaucratically cumbersome health care insurance 
financing system on the entire face of the Earth, that they prefer that 
as opposed to giving a decent break to this fine family and to all of 
you. I don't believe the American people prefer that, and we had better 
make sure that no one draws that historic lesson from this health care 
debate.
    There's a lot of talk today about the whole term ``empowerment''. It 
risks becoming a buzzword. There is an empowerment television network. 
But frankly, I like it. It encaptures something that is uniquely 
American: the idea that people ought to be able to live up to the 
fullest of their God-given abilities and that the Government should 
facilitate people fulfilling themselves, not just be a paternalistic 
Government doing things for people. I have believed in that for years. 
Long before I ever became President, I worked on things that I thought 
would promote empowerment: more choices for parents and children in 
education, tax breaks for lower income working people, some of the 
things that we've also promoted here in Washington. The family and 
medical leave act here in my Presidency was an empowerment bill that 
enables people to be good parents and good workers at the same time, the 
empowerment zone concept that

[[Page 955]]

we passed through the economic program last time, lower student loans--
lower interest rates for student loans and better paybacks--is an 
empowerment notion. National service is an empowerment notion: let 
people have the strength at the grassroots level to solve their own 
problems.
    Empowerment involves work and family and self-fulfillment in a 
responsible way. How can we empower the American people when 81 million 
of us live in families with preexisting conditions; when the average 
American, in the normal course of an economic lifetime, now will change 
jobs eight times; when this fine man cannot change a job, even if he 
gets a better job offer, because he can't insure his child? Is that 
empowerment? No, it is the very reverse. So when we try to fix it, what 
do our adversaries say? ``They're trying to have the Government take 
over the health care system.'' False. Private insurance, private 
providers, empowerment for this man, this woman, these children, their 
families, and their futures. [Applause] Can you stay around here until 
this is over? [Laughter] You're great.
    Now, they say--let's not kid ourselves, if this were easy, it would 
have been done already, right? Somebody would have been--people have 
been trying to do it for 60 years. What is the nub of this? The nub is 
the question of how to cover everybody and then how to give small 
businesses the same market power in buying insurance that big business 
and Government have. Because all across America, Government and big 
business are downsizing, and small businesses are growing. I might say, 
that means we better fix this now, because 10 years from now you'll have 
a smaller percentage of people working for Government and big business 
and a larger percentage of people working for small business. And if we 
do not fix this now, this is going to get worse, not better.
    We already have about 100,000 Americans a month losing their 
insurance permanently. In the future, if we're going to be caught up in 
the kind of a world that I want, where we have open borders and we trade 
and we have these churning, fascinating, ever-changing economies, we had 
better fix it now, because people will change jobs more often, not less 
often.
    This is a profoundly important issue. But we cannot do it unless we 
find a way for everyone to have access and actually be covered by 
insurance. Nine out of 10 Americans who have private insurance today 
have it at work. Eight out of 10 Americans who don't have insurance, 
like this fine young man here, are in families where there is at least 
one working person. Therefore, it makes logical sense to say that people 
who do work should be covered through work with a combination of 
responsibility, just as this family has, from employers and the 
employee. And then people who are not working should be covered from a 
public fund. That is our plan; hardly a Government takeover of health 
care.
    And it makes sense for the Government to empower small business to 
be able to afford this by providing the opportunity to be in buyers' co-
ops so that small businesses, self-employed people, and farmers can buy 
insurance on the same term big business and Government can, and thereby 
can afford to hire persons with disabilities. Because they will be 
insured in big pools so that if there is one big bill for this young man 
here, the insurer does not go broke.
    And furthermore, it makes sense to give small businesses a discount 
because a lot of them have financial burdens and lower profit margins, 
and so we do that. That is the role of the Government in this: require 
people who don't provide insurance to their employees to do it in 
partnership with their employees; let small businesses go into big 
buyers' co-ops so they can buy insurance on the same terms that the 
President and the Congress can and people who work for big companies 
can; eliminate discrimination so that people can move from job to job by 
removing the problems of preexisting conditions; and finally, face the 
fact that if you look at the aging population and the disabled 
population, we must do something to support long-term care that is 
community-based and home-based.
    This is empowerment. This plan helps a person with a disability to 
be able to take a job by including a tax credit for personal assistance 
services worth 50 percent of what he or she earns. That's empowerment. 
But home and community based long-term care is also empowerment. And it 
also, over the

[[Page 956]]

long run, will be less expensive. Does it cost more in the short run? 
Yes, it costs some extra money. But if you look at the population trends 
in this country, if you look at the people with disabilities who are 
surviving and having lives that are meaningful, if you look at the 
fastest growing group of Americans being people over 65, and within that 
group the fastest growing being people over 80, this is something we 
have to face as a people. We will either do it now in a rational way, or 
we will be dragged kicking and screaming into it piecemeal, Band-Aid-
like, over the next 10 years. But, make no mistake about it, we cannot 
run away from this, because we cannot afford either to have everybody in 
the world forced into a nursing home or living in abject neglect. We 
can't do one of the two things.
    So I say to you, all of you know that there is no perfect solution, 
no easy solution. All of you know that our bill, in order to pay for it, 
phases some of these services in. But it recognizes the reality of who 
we are as a people and what we need. We need the work of every American 
who can work. We need the respect, the dignity of every American. And we 
need to provide the opportunity for every American to live up to his or 
her capacity in the least restrictive environment that that person might 
choose. We need to secure for the American economy the services of every 
person who wishes to be and is capable of being a successful worker. We 
need to stop seeing Government health care expenditures go up 2 and 3 
times the rate of inflation every year to pay more for the same health 
care. We need to stop spending more money on paperwork and 
administrative costs, because of the health care financing system in 
this country, than any other country in the world.
    We can do all of that and keep the doctors, the nurses, the health 
care system we have. That's why there are so many thousands and 
thousands, indeed millions now, of nurses, health care providers, and 
physicians who have supported our cause.
    And so I ask you, the real problem with this, I am convinced, is 
that there is no way, to use the political vernacular, to ``kiss'' it, 
to ``keep it simple, stupid.'' That's what people always tell me, you 
know. [Laughter] The real problem here is that we bear the burden of 
every move, those of us who want change, because we live in a system 
that is complicated. So it is not simple to fix it.
    So I plead with you, a lot of you will contact Members of Congress 
who voted for the Americans With Disabilities Act who are not yet 
prepared to vote to make sure every American has health insurance and 
who do not understand yet that you cannot eliminate preexisting 
conditions and you cannot eliminate other discriminatory practices and 
you cannot afford to begin to provide long-term care that is community-
based and home-based unless you set up a system where everybody has 
health care insurance, where small businesses can buy on the same terms 
big business and Government can and where insurers insure in big enough 
pools so that nobody goes broke when they do insure a family where a 
member has a disability and where small businesses get a discount. Those 
are the things we try to do with the power of Government.
    It is a legitimate thing to do, but when you strip it all away, what 
we're really trying to do is to empower the families of this country to 
live in dignity, to work in dignity, and to fulfill themselves. And in a 
strange way, this is a battle that the disability community, known so 
well to the Members of Congress, being so successful in the passage of 
the Americans With Disabilities Act, this is a battle that you may be 
able to lead for the rest of America that they do not understand.
    So I ask you to do that, be an agent of change, an agent of 
empowerment, never forget that you are carrying on your shoulders now 
not only your own cause but ours as well. We cannot, in the end, fully 
unleash the forces of all human Americans until we do this. And we 
cannot do this with all the resistance and all the organized opposition, 
with the sheer intellectual difficulty of the tasks, unless people like 
you can break through. You can break through to those Members of 
Congress. You can do it. You can do it. And we need you, all the rest of 
America, we need you to do it.
    Good luck, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 9:55 a.m. in the East Room at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Stephanie Thomas, co-operator of 
the Austin, TX, chapter, American Disabled for

[[Page 957]]

Attendant Programs Today; Denise Figueroa, president, National Council 
on Independent Living; Tony Coelho, Chair, and Justin Dart, former 
Chair, President's Committee on the Employment of People With 
Disabilities; and Kate Miles, mother of a disabled son and advocate for 
long-term care and health care reform.