[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 30, Number 5 (Monday, February 7, 1994)]
[Pages 191-193]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to the Department of Labor Conference on Reemployment

February 2, 1994

    First of all, let me thank all of you for being willing to be a part 
of this program today, and all of you who are here. And let me thank 
whoever set the microphone up for my hoarse voice. I presume you can 
hear it out there, even in its depleted condition.
    Before I became President, I worked, incidentally, with some of the 
people in this audience today as a Governor for a dozen years on a lot 
of these kinds of programs which we know work. And we did an awful lot 
of work in my home State to try to help customize programs to meet the 
needs of not only the people who were losing their jobs but also to fit 
them to the economy that existed and the economy that was emerging in 
our State and to try at the same time to shape the economy so that there 
would be opportunities for people who were willing to go through the 
retraining programs. Nonetheless, I always had this frustration that 
there were a lot of people who were succeeding because they were good 
people, and there were good people running these programs and they were 
making them work sometimes against all the odds, but I never had the 
feeling that there was a system established in our country that made any 
real sense for the economy that exists today and the one that's going 
forward.
    Now, Secretary Reich and I were talking on the way over here, and I 
had already reviewed all the materials on this conference, about the 
morning session focusing on what's wrong with the present system and the 
second session talking about things that work. We obviously have some 
real success stories here, and what I would like to do is to maybe just 
ask some of the panelists to talk a little bit about their own 
experiences and then to try to identify whatever was in their experience 
that ought to be part of a national program, that ought to be part of--
in other words, every program with Federal money in it everywhere. 
That's really what we mean by national program because there's not a 
national economy in that sense.
    I mean, the economy is different, and the pool of people and what 
their needs are is different in every place. But it seems to me there 
ought to be some common elements to these programs. So that's kind of 
what I hope will come out of this, and I hope that all of you who are 
out here will also be thinking of that. We have to shape in this year 
legislation that will, to use our common phrase that the Vice 
President's given us, reinvent the way we provide these training 
opportunities in the hope that we can create more success stories.
    There are other things we have to do, too. And I'll say more about 
that at the end of the program. But that is what I'd like to focus

[[Page 192]]

on, because we have to make some hard decisions in the next 30 to 45 
days about what ought to be in these programs, what we can fund, and 
what we can't. Inevitably we'll come up against budgetary constraints, 
and there will be some things we'll be able to do and some things we 
won't. So, I'd like to start by asking each of you to talk maybe in a 
little more detail about your personal experiences. And then if you can 
say in your own words what you think ought to be in every program in 
every State that affects someone like you, I hope you will do that.

[At this point, the President participated in a panel discussion with 
formerly displaced workers and the people whose programs helped them to 
find jobs, and his remarks were not released by the Office of the Press 
Secretary. The President then made the following concluding remarks.]

    Let me wrap up by just making a couple of observations. First of 
all, to thank all those panelists who were here, the ones on my panel 
and the ones who were here earlier and all of you for coming.
    What we are trying to do in our administration with the leadership 
of the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Education and many others 
is to establish a system of lifelong learning, to recognize that people 
are going to change work seven or eight times in a lifetime, that even 
if you're fortunate enough to have your employer able to keep you with 
the same company for a lifetime, doing that will require continuous 
changing skills.
    The way we do things will be different tomorrow than the way we did 
things today. You heard Father Cunningham talking about making a clean 
car. Well, being a bank teller is a very different job today than it was 
5 years ago, too. Working in most hospital jobs are different today than 
it was 5 years ago. Things are changing rapidly, and they will continue 
to.
    We have some major pieces of legislation: Our Goals 2000 bill, which 
affects the way public schools operate and tries to give them some 
international standards against which to measure their own efforts; a 
school-to-work initiative which tries to recognize that a lot of young 
people don't go to college but do need the kinds of skills that we've 
been talking about today. And we are going to propose transforming the 
whole unemployment system to try to deal with some of the problems you 
heard about today, to make it a continuous reemployment system so that 
there is at least no delay from the time a person stops getting a 
paycheck until a person starts into a retraining program, because we 
know that the old jobs don't come back anymore. And we're going to try 
to do it in a way that will give enormous incentives to support programs 
at the local level that get rid of bureaucracy and that aren't all 
divided up, not only consolidating the training programs but, with these 
one-stop centers, making sure that nobody who loses a job is left to the 
chance of whether some coworker says, ``Well, here's a program that 
might work,'' and that no one on welfare wanders out of the welfare 
office and has to depend on the luck of someone else saying, ``Here's 
something that will help you turn your life around.'' It seems to me 
that we have to do that.
    The second thing we have to do, to follow up on what Linda said, is 
to reward programs that produce results and to make it absolutely clear 
that those results are what matter, that in the end, that the job 
training programs have to lead to work or they don't work.
    Later this month we will introduce the ``Reemployment Act of 1994'' 
which will, hopefully, contain the wisdom that all of you have imparted 
to us today. And I hope you will help us to pass it. In a time in which 
we have to cut domestic spending, we have to find more money to spend on 
this. And I am presenting a budget to the Congress on Monday which will 
eliminate completely 100 Government programs and cut back over 300 
others, so that we can squeeze the money out of this budget to put more 
money into people to get jobs in the private sector where the future of 
the country is.
    And again, I will say that I hope all of you will support that, 
because we've got a lot of yesterday's programs in the Government, too, 
and we're just kidding ourselves if we just keep spending money on 
things that don't really move the whole economy forward, don't create 
more jobs, don't give people a different and a better future.

[[Page 193]]

    We know right now from what you've told us that we have to 
consolidate all these different programs for laid-off workers. And 
again, it won't be easy because there will be people, good people in the 
Congress who will say, ``Well, there was reason we had this separate 
program. There were people we were trying to help.''
    We've got to learn to trust people like Father Cunningham and Linda 
Butler, and other people at the grassroots level who are producing jobs. 
We have to consolidate the programs in law and let them diversify, in 
fact, where it makes sense, out in the country. Instead of that, we had 
the reverse. We have diversified the programs in law so that they can't 
have any impact out there in the country. So I hope you will help us to 
do that.
    The bill will create one-stop shopping centers, and it will create 
incentives to put the consumer first and to try to bring the business 
community into this so that employers, even when they don't have to, 
will want to give their workers more notice. Working people in this 
country are grownups. They understand the global economy. They know what 
is happening, and they deserve the right to control their destiny in a 
better way. And so we will try to engage the employer community in that 
and the labor community in that. And I'm very hopeful that we can.
    And finally, we're working hard to get as much money as we can to 
make this training long-term, to have enough time to meet the needs of 
people, and to meet the needs of our future economy. And I have learned 
some very specific things today that we're going to go back and try to 
make sure we've got in that bill as well as in the welfare reform bill. 
Three years from now, I never want to hear another Cynthia Scott story 
like that again. The welfare office ought to be the work office; it 
ought to be the job training office; it ought to be the place where you 
can be a successful worker and a successful parent.
    So, I thank you all for coming. I thank you for your contributions. 
I want to say a little about my friend of 25 years, our Labor Secretary. 
I think he's done a wonderful job because he cares about people like 
you, and we're trying to be relevant to your future.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 1:45 p.m. in the Blue Room at the Omni 
Shoreham Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to the following panel 
participants: Rev. William Cunningham, executive director, Focus: HOPE, 
Detroit, MI; Linda Lyons Butler, job placement specialist, Tradeswomen 
of Philadelphia/Women in Non-Traditional Jobs (WIN/TOP), Philadelphia, 
PA; and Cynthia Scott, participant, Project QUEST, San Antonio, TX.