[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 29, Number 47 (Monday, November 29, 1993)]
[Pages 2427-2431]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks at a Reception Honoring Senator Dianne Feinstein in San 
Francisco, California

 November 20, 1993

    Thank you very much, William Lewis Brown, Junior. [Laughter] I love 
San Francisco. Willie Brown gets called by his full name, and Clarence 
Clemmons replaces the Marine Band.
    You know, I once told Dianne Feinstein I would do anything legal I 
could for California. It turned out that that included replacing her at 
her own fundraiser. You wonder how I get those one-vote margins--no 
chore is too large or small for the President to perform. [Laughter] 
Dianne throws a party for 750 people, Dick doesn't even come to the 
airport to meet me, and I show up here to speak anyway. [Laughter]
    It reminds me, you know, the last time I was in California a few 
weeks ago, I went down to L.A., and I had been through an interesting 
period of humbling, as I periodically experience. I mean, first, Al Gore 
goes on the Letterman show and is a smash hit, smashing his little 
ashtray and proving that we're going to reinvent Government, and he 
becomes a media star. I get beat up in the news; he has fun on 
Letterman. [Laughter] Then Hillary goes before the Senate and answers 
questions for 5 days without notes, and there's a poll in USA Today 
saying that 40 percent of the American people think she's smarter than I 
am. They asked me what I thought about it. I said what I thought was I 
couldn't understand how the other 60 percent missed it. [Laughter]
    But then they told me I had a trip to California. I have such a 
wonderful time when I come out here. And I thought, well, I'll go out 
there, and they'll make me feel like a real President again. So I went 
to L.A., and they said I was going to stay in the Beverly Hilton 
Hotel.'' And Merv Griffin owns it, and I said, ``It will be great. I'll 
bet Merv Griffin will be there to meet me there, and I'll feel really 
important. And they'll give me a nice room, and I'll have a great view 
of that beautiful golf course that's across the street from the hotel.'' 
That all happened. But here's what else happened--so help me, this is 
not made up. I get there, and I'm spruced up, because there's Merv 
Griffin all dolled up, and shakes hands, says, ``How are you? I'm glad 
you're here at my hotel. I got you a wonderful suite upstairs. There is 
one permanent resident on the floor where you'll be staying, and I 
thought it was appropriate for you to be there with him.'' I mean, it's 
Los Angeles; I was thrilled; my mind was going crazy, right? I get on 
the elevator; I get up to the umpty-dump floor, whatever it was; the 
elevator opens, and there holding a dozen roses for me is Rodney 
Dangerfield. It's true. He gives me a dozen of something called jungle 
roses with ``a little respect'' on the card. [Laughter]
    Well, I am glad to be back. Senator Feinstein really is coming home 
today. They worked late, hard, and well tonight in the United State 
Senate, not only passing 2 days early the trade agreement but also 
passing at long last the Brady bill.
    I've found a lot of things to like and admire about Dianne 
Feinstein, even when she's wearing me out. That's one of the things I 
admire about her. I called her one night, and I said, ``Nobody wears me 
out as effectively as you do.'' She's always got a new idea about 
something that will help this State. But I was never more proud of her 
than I was the other day when she called and she said, ``You're for that 
assault weapons ban, aren't you?'' And I said, ``You know I am.'' She 
said, ``Well, we've got to try to put it on the bill, and I want you to 
help me, and here's who I want you to call.'' So I said, ``Okay, I'll do 
it.'' And she said, ``If you call one person, it will be all over the 
Senate, and they'll know that you're not kidding about it.'' So then she 
got

[[Page 2428]]

into this interchange which you probably remember with a Senator of the 
other party that said that--the implication was if she weren't a woman 
and if she weren't from California, she might know something about 
handguns. And she blistered him about what she knew about handguns and 
weapons generally. I want to tell you, it was a sweet moment in a town 
full of sanctimony to see another hot air balloon burst. [Laughter]
    Sometimes I feel like I'm in a time warp. We live in a wonderful 
country, but there are a lot of kids in trouble. And you've got streets 
where the gang members are better armed than the policemen, and innocent 
people are getting shot in the crossfire. And the time before last when 
I was out here in California, I was in Sacramento, as I remember, to do 
a town meeting. And there were people connected in towns all over the 
State. And this one young man said he was changing the school he was in 
because he and his brother didn't want to be in gangs; they didn't want 
to own guns; they didn't want to be in trouble; they didn't want to do 
drugs. They just wanted to get a good education; they wanted to go to 
college; they wanted to make a good life for themselves. So they changed 
schools to go to a safer school. And he and his brother were standing in 
line registering, and his brother got shot down in the line registering 
for school, in the school building.
    And that could happen everywhere. And yet, you listen to these 
debates on the crime bill, the kind of things we're trying to do, and it 
sounds like some people are just literally in another world. Well, I've 
got to give the Senate and the House credit: They passed the Brady bill. 
They passed a crime bill that will give the cities of our country the 
actual means to reduce the crime rate. Don't let anybody kid you that 
more police officers properly deployed won't reduce the crime rate, not 
just catch criminals but reduce the crime rate. There is no question 
that it will work.
    My friend Bob Lanier, the Governor of Houston, Texas, just got 
reelected with 91 percent of the vote because he told the people if 
they'd vote for him he would, through new people and overtime, put the 
equivalent of another 655 police officers on the street, he would deploy 
them properly, they'd have community policing, and the crime rate would 
go down. He did it, and the crime rate went down 17 percent in one year. 
And the people sent him back to the Mayor's office.
    This will make a difference, this crime bill. But it makes a 
difference also that there are boot camps as opposed to prisons for 
youthful offenders, to give them a chance to do something constructive 
with their lives. And it makes a difference that the Brady bill passed. 
And it makes a difference that Dianne's amendment got on the Senate 
version of the bill. And when it goes to conference, I hope to goodness 
we can keep it the whole way.
    I want you to know that because you have two highly unusual, very 
gifted first-year United States Senators in Dianne Feinstein and Barbara 
Boxer, who have both made a profound impact on the politics of this 
country, and I am in their debt because, as Willie said, you know, I've 
had a few votes up there that weren't landslides. [Laughter] Every time 
Al Gore and I are together, he sits up and looks at a crowd and says, 
``You know what the difference in me and other people in the Federal 
Government are? When I vote in the United States Senate, I'm always on 
the winning side.'' You have to think about that. When he said that, I 
knew he could beat Ross Perot in that debate. [Laughter]
    It has been, as Willie said, an eventful 10 months. And with the 
help of the person you're here to honor tonight, we made a good 
beginning at turning the conditions around that have caused our country 
and this State so much grief. The United States Congress passed the 
largest deficit reduction package in history that gave us historically 
low interest rates, kept inflation down, enabled literally millions and 
millions of Americans to refinance their homes, and helped to produce 
more jobs in the private sector in the first 10 months of this 
administration than in the previous 4 years. Do we need more jobs? You 
bet we do, but that's a pretty good beginning.
    That budget bill had an expanded earned-income tax credit--which is 
a long phrase now unfamiliar to Americans, but on April 15th it will 
become much more familiar--

[[Page 2429]]

which does the most important job that we have done in our Tax Code in 
20 years in rewarding work. For it says to all those lower income 
working people who have been working harder for less for two decades and 
who have children in their homes, we will reward your work. If you are 
at or near the poverty line, we will lift you up if you are willing to 
work and raise your children. We will not punish you for the decision to 
labor on and make the best you can of your life. It is profoundly 
significant and the biggest incentive for people to move from welfare to 
work that has been adopted in my lifetime. It will affect 14 million 
working families and almost 50 million Americans in those families when 
it becomes law, when the next tax returns are filed.
    This tax bill also gave the high-tech community in northern 
California and throughout the country what they have been asking for for 
years: a capital gains treatment for long-term investments in new and 
small business; an expansion of the research and development tax credit; 
and by the way, a radical--yes, you can clap for that, that's all right. 
[Applause] And something that almost nobody knows, it also radically 
reorganized the student loan program to keep one of the real commitments 
I made in the Presidential campaign of 1992, to open the doors of 
college education to all Americans. Because now, under this law, the 
interest rates on college loans will be lower. The terms for repayment 
will be lengthened. Young people who choose to be public school teachers 
or do other public service work will be able to pay those loans back no 
matter how much they borrow as a percentage of their income. It will be 
tougher for people to evade repaying the loans, but they'll be much, 
much easier to repay.
    The Congress also passed a national service law which 3 years from 
now will permit 100,000 young Americans--8 times as many as ever served 
in one year in the Peace Corps--100,000 to work in a domestic peace 
corps to rebuild this country from the grassroots up and earn credit 
against a college education for doing it.
    This Congress also passed and I signed the family and medical leave 
law, which gives people the right to have time off from their jobs. You 
know, sometimes when you're in Washington, you're always answering 
questions about process and who's up and who's down and who's in and 
who's out, what does this vote mean, and what do you have to say about 
what this politician said about you. And sometimes you just forget all 
about the human impact of what you do or don't do.
    About a month ago, on Sunday morning I came in from my morning jog, 
and I looked in the ground floor of the White House, and one of my young 
staffers was taking a family around on a tour, which is very unusual on 
Sunday morning. There was a man and his wife and three children. One of 
the children was in a wheelchair. And it was one of these Make-A-Wish 
Foundation families, you know; the child was very ill, and her wish was 
to come to the White House and see the President. So I went over and 
shook hands with them and asked if they would excuse me. I told them I'd 
go up and get cleaned up and try to look like the President again, and 
we'd take a picture. And I came down in a few minutes, and we took the 
picture. And I was going about my business, and the man grabbed me by 
the arm and turned around, and he said, ``Let me tell you something, Mr. 
President, just in case you think what you do here doesn't matter. My 
little girl is really sick, and she's probably not going to make it. And 
because of that family leave law, I've been able to take some time off 
from my job and spend some time with my child. It's the most important 
time I've ever had in my life. And if that law hadn't passed, I would 
have had to choose between spending this time with this child or staying 
at my job and supporting the two children who are going to make it in my 
family. And I didn't have to make that choice. Don't you ever think what 
you do up here doesn't make a difference.''
    I tell you that because sometimes when you come to dinners like 
this, it is easy to forget. You say, ``Well, my friends are doing this, 
and I like Dianne, and I'm here for this.'' You are also here for larger 
purposes. And we have established together a record we can be proud of. 
But there is still much to be done. Still in process but not resolved 
are the crime bill, the Brady bill--because the House and the Senate 
passed two different

[[Page 2430]]

versions, they have to be resolved--the campaign finance reform bill, 
the lobby reform bill, and the legislation to finally, at long last, 
provide health care security to all Americans. We have a lot to do, and 
it matters whether this Senator is reelected to the United States 
Senate.
    I also want you to know it matters because of what we are trying to 
do for this country that specifically affects California. As I said, 
Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer constantly are giving me their 
laundry lists of things that they think that this Government can do to 
help this State. And almost always it's also very, very good for the 
whole country.
    We have removed from export controls $35 billion worth of high-tech 
equipment, computers, supercomputers, telecommunications equipment, 
thanks to the relentless work of the Secretary of Commerce, Ron Brown, 
who is here with me tonight. And California will benefit from that. 
[Applause] Stand up.
    We've transferred 200 acres, or I have directed it--we have to work 
out the details--from Alameda Air Station to the Port of Oakland. We are 
cutting through redtape so that the dredging of the port can start 8 
months earlier than it otherwise would have. And the most exciting thing 
to me is our technology reinvestment project where we're putting up for 
competition limited Federal dollars to match with private funds for 
defense contractors to come up with things that can be done in a post-
cold-war economy to create the high-tech jobs of the future.
    In the last round, the first of three rounds of projects, California 
got almost 25 percent of the projects fair and square through a 
completely competitive bidding process. And why not? That's why your 
unemployment rate is so high now, because you had such a high percentage 
of reliance on defense. You should have a high percentage of reward for 
conversion from a defense to a domestic economy. And we're going to do 
more of those things--[applause]--the Congress believes it.
    Ultimately, however, the economy of this State cannot recover unless 
the economy of America recovers and moves toward a high-tech, high-wage, 
highly competitive future and one in which all of our children are taken 
along instead of so many being left behind.
    I ran for President because I thought there were two great problems 
in this country we had to address: One was to try to bring the economy 
back. The other was to try to bring the American people together, to 
make a strength out of our diversity, and to stop leaving so many of our 
children behind. We have made a good beginning on that.
    One of the reasons I fought so hard for the highly controversial 
trade agreement with Mexico and Canada is that I have studied 
relentlessly for years the job-creating figures and the unemployment 
figures of every State in this country and every major advanced 
industrial nation in the world. Every rich country is having trouble 
creating jobs. Productivity, which is important to compete, is not 
leading to the creation of new jobs in much of the world today because 
productivity means fewer people can produce more things. And therefore, 
if fewer people produce more things, unemployment will stay high and 
wages will stay flat unless there are more customers for those things, 
which means we must have higher rates of growth in the world economy, 
and the United States must have more customers. There is no other way 
for us ultimately to grow this economy. We have to have a higher rate of 
growth and more customers. The trade agreement means more customers. The 
meeting I had today with the leaders of those 13 other Pacific nations 
means higher rates of growth and more customers if we do what we're 
supposed to do. That is what we must be about.
    But that also will not work unless we are willing, my fellow 
Americans, to take up the hard work of healing the wounds of the last 10 
and 20 and 30 years here at home. The whole practice of rearing children 
has been under assault for three decades in America. Middle class wages 
have been under assault for two decades here in this country, and more 
and more working people are actually poor. And for a very long time we 
have followed an economic theory that said if we made our country more 
unequal and ran the debt up, somehow it would all work out, regardless 
if whether we invested in the growth of this economy or not.

[[Page 2431]]

    It is time to address those things. The crime bill is a beginning. 
The earned-income tax credit is a beginning. We are making beginnings. 
Trying to deal with health care and giving Americans health care 
security, whether they've got a job or not, whether they've been sick or 
not, is a beginning. Every disabled person in America, every person who 
is now HIV positive but healthy enough to work in America, every person 
in this country with a small business will be advantaged if we can 
finally join the ranks of every other country in the world and give 
affordable health care to all of our people. It is also positive 
economics.
    I met just this week, as you know, with the Prime Minister of Japan, 
with the Prime Minister of Canada, with the leaders of a lot of other 
countries. And they said, ``How much money do you spend on health 
care?'' I said, ``Fifteen percent of our income.'' They said, ``What? 
And how many people do you have insured?'' I said, ``Thirty-seven 
million.'' They said, ``What?'' And I said, ``You know what, nobody 
believes we can fix it. Every time I say we're going to fix it by doing 
what other people have done that worked, they say, `Oh, it's going to 
cost more money.' '' And they say, ``What?'' [Laughter]
     I'm telling you, folks, we have got to fix this. We can't go on 
spending a dime on the dollar more than any other country in the world 
does on paperwork in our health care system and expect to do anything 
but be punished for it economically and in human terms.
    But beyond all that, we have got to recognize that we cannot be what 
we're supposed to be if children are shot with reckless abandon in our 
streets, if children grow up without a future, and if people go around 
bemoaning it but don't want to do anything about it. And the President 
of the United States and the United States Congress can only do so much. 
Some of this will have to be done community by community, neighborhood 
by neighborhood, family by family, block by block.
    But we can do it. If you leave here tonight believing anything, I 
want you to believe our country is on the move again. I'm telling you, 
those leaders of those Asian countries were exhilarated when we passed 
that trade agreement because they thought we were going to turn away 
from the world and walk away. And they know now we're not. But I'll tell 
you something else: Everyone of them admitted that the opposition to 
NAFTA deserved to be honored because of the rampant insecurity of 
working people in every advanced country in the world. The story I had 
to tell here was the same story I heard from Canada, from Australia, 
from New Zealand, increasingly true in all of Europe, and even now 
coming to be true in Japan. We have got to find a way to reward people 
who work hard and who are competitive. And we have got to find a way to 
bring all of our people along.
    This administration is pursuing that direction as vigorously as we 
know how. We are on the move. And we are going to get there if you in 
California, who have the largest stake in our future success, will make 
sure that in Washington the President has partners like Senator Dianne 
Feinstein.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 9 p.m. in the Grand Ballroom at the 
Fairmont Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to William L. Brown, Jr., 
California State Assembly speaker; Clarence Clemmons, saxophonist; and 
Richard C. Blum, the Senator's husband. A tape was not available for 
verification of the content of these remarks.