[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 29, Number 39 (Monday, October 4, 1993)]
[Pages 1923-1925]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on Signing the Executive Order on Regulatory Planning and Review 
and an Exchange With Reporters

 September 30, 1993

    The President. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to 
another action-packed meeting of our action-packed administration.
    Today I am signing an Executive order to create a fair, open, 
streamlined system of regulatory review for our Government to eliminate 
improper influence, delay secrecy, and to set tough standards and time 
limits for regulation.
    It's a move in keeping with everything else we've tried to do since 
Inauguration Day. The philosophy of this administration has always been 
consistent when it comes to regulation. We reject the ``if it moves, 
regulate it'' approach. And we reject the idea that we can walk away 
from regulation entirely. We have sought a third way, consistent with 
the philosophy behind the Vice President's reinventing Government 
project, with our approach to health care, to export controls, to a 
whole range of other issues.
    We can't reject all regulations. Many of them do a lot of good 
things. They protect workers in the workplace, shoppers in the grocery 
stores, children opening new toys. But there are others that serve no 
purpose at all. This Executive order will provide a way to get rid of 
useless, outdated, and unnecessary regulations that are outdated, 
obsolete, expensive, and bad for business.
    We're working on the impact of regulation on Government, too. That's 
what the Vice President's report on reinventing Government does. To 
improve budget, personnel, and procurements systems, we can strip away 
an awful lot of redtape for all of you.
    All of you are working yourselves on a focused review of 
regulations. And that's why on September the 11th, as you'll recall, I 
signed an Executive order directing our Agencies to eliminate 50 percent 
of our internal regulations.
    The next step is reforming the regulatory review process itself. 
That's what the Executive order today does. We've already shut down the 
so-called competitiveness council, which closed the back door to special 
interests to get out from under regulations they didn't like. In its 
place, we have a dramatically different approach, fair, streamlined, 
responsive, much more straightforward.
    Under the Executive order that I am signing today, involvement by 
the President and the Vice President in the regulatory process is 
strictly limited. The order permits the Vice President's review only at 
the request of the Cabinet member or the OMB's OIRA office. 
Communications between White House staff members and the public are 
limited, too, on matters of regulation. In order to be utilized in the 
rulemaking process or the review process, they must be made in writing 
and put in the public record.
    Just these changes alone mean the days of back-door access to 
undermining the regulatory process is over. But we also want to limit 
the number of regulations that may be reviewed by the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs. It's very important that we let 
ordinary regulations be done in a more timely fashion, where the people 
who are going to be affected by them have more

[[Page 1924]]

front-end involvement. This order requires written justification for 
rejections of regulations, mandates Sunshine provisions, requires a 
publicly available log, which the press will love. It has guidelines not 
just for review of new regulations but, this is very important, for a 
review of existing regulations, too. We should be eliminating 
regulations even as we have new ones.
    This order will lighten the load for regulated industries and make 
Government regulations that are needed more efficient. Most of all, it 
will put behind us the politics of adversarialism that has divided 
Government and industry for too long. We saw a beginning of what that 
can mean for America yesterday, with the announcements between the 
Government and the auto industry of the project to try to triple the 
fuel efficiency of our cars by the end of the decade. That's the sort of 
thing we ought to be focusing on in our relationships with Government 
and industry.
    In the last few weeks, we've seen a remarkable amount of progress in 
our Nation, a lot of things turning around. This is an important step in 
that process. The way the Government relates to people whom it must 
regulate, or decide whether to regulate or not, has an enormous amount 
to do with the credibility that our Government has with all of the 
citizens of our country and with how we're spending their tax money. I 
am very excited about this. I think the wind is now behind us, and I 
hope we can see through this project and continue on the road that we 
are clearly taking now.

[At this point, the President signed the Executive order.]

Cutting White House Staff

    Q. Mr. President, a Member of Congress on the House floor has just 
characterized your claim that you've really cut the White House staff as 
unethical and a lie. He says that you cut people who are not political 
operatives and that there really hasn't been a budget savings.
    The President. Well, we have cut it. I can guarantee people around 
here have been complaining about it because we're handling more mail, 
doing more work, and carrying a bigger load than this White House has 
carried in more than a dozen years, and we're doing it with fewer 
people. All you have to do is just ask people around here and they'll be 
glad to tell you that.
    Who is the Member of Congress?
    Q. Congressman Wolf.
    The President. Well, the burden is on him to establish that. I don't 
want to get in an argument with him about the staff. The truth is we're 
doing more work than my predecessors did with fewer people, and it's 
pretty hard on these people. They're staying here real late, and they're 
working awful hard.

Political Appointees

    Q. Do you really have fewer political appointees than your 
predecessors?
    The President. Well, the President has the right to replace 
everybody in the White House. I didn't do that and most people don't. 
But to imply that someone who came here because I got elected President 
is somehow less valuable or not working is, I think, a pretty spurious 
claim.
    The truth is that in the White House, at least, it's been my 
experience, not just for me, but for my Republican predecessors, that 
the so-called political appointees are the ones that have to work 60 or 
70 or 80 hours a week and are making most of the decisions and doing 
most of the hard work. So I don't understand what the claim is there. If 
Mr. Wolf wins re-election to his office, if he hires somebody to work 
there, they're a political appointee. But if they work hard and do a 
good job, they deserve to be treated like everybody else.
    Q. Do you think when you talked about cutting the White House staff 
25 percent, that most Americans thought that that didn't mean political 
appointees, it just meant career people?
    The President. I don't think most Americans make that distinction. I 
think most Americans want to know what size Government's going to be. If 
we reduce the size of the Federal Government by a quarter of a million 
people over the next 4 years, most of those people will be career 
positions we won't fill again. But to say that the people that work in 
the White House, that work virtually around the clock all week long are 
somehow less significant because they work

[[Page 1925]]

harder and longer, I think is a pretty hard argument to make.

Note: The President spoke at 10:45 a.m. in the Cabinet Room at the White 
House.