[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 29, Number 37 (Monday, September 20, 1993)]
[Pages 1766-1770]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session on the North American Free 
Trade Agreement in New Orleans, Louisiana

 September 15, 1993

    The President. Thank you. I'm glad you didn't let a little rain and 
a change of venue dampen your spirits. You may all still be excited 
after the Saints game last week. But I'm glad to be here.
    I want to thank Mr. Brinson and Senator Breaux and Congressman 
Jefferson for what they have said. I'm glad to be here again with your 
Governor, your Lieutenant Governor, your State treasurer, and others, 
and Mayor Barthelemy. And I want to thank the Members of Congress who 
came here from other States, took time out of their busy schedules in 
Washington just to travel down to express their support on a bipartisan 
basis and from States all across this country for the North American 
Free Trade Agreement.
    It really is, I think, not only a job winner for the United States 
but the opportunity for us to get off the defensive in our economic 
policies and go on offense and try to build a world in which there are 
more opportunities for Americans not only for good jobs but for growing 
incomes.
    For 20 years we have been buffeted by the fortunes of global 
competition and mechanization and all the things that you know about, 
and more and more working people have been pressured in their daily 
lives, finding it harder and harder to make ends meet. It is obvious 
that what we have been doing has not worked very well. We know what 
makes more jobs in a wealthy country: Expanding trade makes more jobs; 
educating your people better makes more jobs; providing more investment 
makes more jobs. These are the things that I am committed to.
    There have been a lot of things said about the North American Free 
Trade Agreement. We came down here to New Orleans today to listen to 
people who know how the trade with Mexico works and who will be affected 
by it, talk about it. But I want to just say one or two general things 
to all of you today.
    Three decades ago this port was dedicated by President Kennedy, a 
person who had a vision of America that knew no limits, who believed 
that we ought to face our challenges, that we ought to look outward to 
the world, that we shouldn't hunker down, that we could compete and win 
with any people anywhere on Earth. It is time that we reestablish that 
belief, that conviction, that commitment.
    Today we come to New Orleans because I believe you face the rest of 
the world with confidence. We heard Senator Breaux and Congressman 
Jefferson talk about the Port of New Orleans. We heard Mr. Brinson say 
it's the most important thing in strategic planning for the future of 
this port to pass this new trade agreement with Mexico.
    Well, yesterday I signed a couple of side agreements that strengthen 
that, agreements that do the following things: number one, that commit 
the Government of Mexico, as well as the Government of the United States 
to invest more money in environmental cleanup. Now, that means two 
things: number one, more opportunities for American companies who do 
that kind of work. Number two, it means that there will be less 
difference in the cost of production on either side of the border 
because of different environmental regulations.

[[Page 1767]]

    The second agreement commits the Mexican Government to enforce its 
own labor laws. And you should know what that really means. It means 
that for the first time in history a government has committed itself to 
raise the minimum wage as its economy grows, thereby raising the wage 
structure throughout the country, because the President of Mexico has 
made a personal commitment to me, to the United States, and to this 
process that Mexico from now on will raise its minimum wage every time 
its economy grows on a regular basis, which means that more rapidly than 
before and much more rapidly than if we don't pass this trade agreement, 
the wage gap between their workers and ours will close, and there will 
be less incentive to move our plants to Mexico but more ability by the 
Mexicans to buy American products that we ship from places like the Port 
of New Orleans.
    Why do I believe this will work? Well, for a couple of reasons. 
First of all, because in the last few years Mexico has begun to lower 
its tariffs and open their markets to more American products. You know 
that because you've been shipping more out of here. In 1986--these boxes 
basically represent where we are--but in 1986 our exports to Mexico were 
a little over $12 billion, represented by this first crate here. At that 
time we had about a $5.7 billion trade deficit with Mexico. Because 
they've lowered tariffs, already we've got a $5.6 billion trade surplus 
with them now. And we estimate that by 1995, just a couple of years 
after the pact goes into effect, we'll have about $60 billion in trade 
with Mexico, represented by this big crate. You don't have to be 
Einstein to figure out if you're an American it's better to have four 
crates than one. That's what this is all about.
    Let me just say a couple of other things. It's not just Mexico, 
especially for the Port of New Orleans. If we can make this trade pact 
work, and we will, because keep in mind--I want to make one other point 
to all those people that say this is a job-loser--that tariffs in 
Mexico, in spite of our trade surplus, are still 4 times as high as the 
tariffs in America against Mexican products. The average Mexican spends 
$450 a year buying American products, more than anybody in the world 
except the Canadians, more than the Japanese, more than the Germans, 
more than a lot of countries where the people are much wealthier. This 
will work because their tariffs are still higher than ours. If you lower 
the tariffs down to where they're as low as ours and then we eventually 
eliminate them, again it just stands to reason that we're going to have 
more sales and more products and more opportunities.
    What I want to say to you finally is that this is the beginning of 
this process, because I can tell you that I have heard from the leaders 
of countries all over Latin America. They are looking at the Congress; 
they are looking about whether we're going to adopt this trade 
agreement. And if we do, then Chile, then Venezuela, then Argentina, 
then many other countries that are becoming more democratic and more 
free-market, free-enterprise oriented are going to want to have more 
trade with the United States and have more of our products. And that 
means still more, more trade going out of the Port of New Orleans 
because there are hundreds of millions of people in Latin America 
committed to democracy now, committed to free markets, and hungering for 
the benefits of a free economy. We can help them to get it and put the 
American people to work as well. And we know that trade-related jobs 
pay, on the average, higher wages than jobs not related to trade. So I 
ask all of you to support this. Now, let me just say that--thanks. 
[Applause]
    There was a time when all the working people in America were for 
more trade, when people realized that if you didn't expand trade you 
couldn't keep expanding jobs. I want to say as a word of respect and 
partial regret, as we're here, there's a funeral going on in New Orleans 
for a labor leader named Lindsey Williams who helped to build this port. 
And Lindy Boggs, your former Congresswoman, wrote me a note about it, 
because I think she is there today. But she was reminding me in this 
note about how New Orleans had always been a place that pushed for more 
trade and a place where labor and management and Republicans and 
Democrats, African-Americans and whites and Hispanics and everybody got 
together because they looked outward to the world.

[[Page 1768]]

    I'm telling you, folks, we cannot afford to look inward. We cannot 
repeal the force that is driving the world economy together. We can run 
away from it and get beat by it, or we can embrace it, do what we have 
to do, and win with it to create more jobs, more incomes, and more 
opportunity. That's what I think we want to do.
    And as I sit down, I want to thank these men and women who are 
behind us. They work for and run companies that benefit from trade with 
Mexico today and who would flourish even more if we pass NAFTA. They 
ship their products through this port every day. And I thank them for 
coming here. They're not professional politicians or seasoned speakers, 
but they're the people that really count. They're the people that really 
count. They're the people who represent the future of this economy. And 
all the people who are arguing around this thing in politics, a lot of 
them won't be affected one way or the other. You need to assess who is 
going to be affected. Are they going to win or lose? The answer is this 
is a good deal. It's a winner. We ought to take it. And these folks are 
about to tell us why.
    Thank you very much.

[At this point, a participant stated that NAFTA will create 15 to 20 
more jobs in a local rice mill.]

    The President. So you'll put together 15 or 20 more people, and the 
rice farmers in my home State of Arkansas will send you rice down here 
to go out of the Port of New Orleans. That's what you're saying, right?
    Q. Well, I'd like for it to be that way, but unfortunately, I'm sure 
your mills will benefit from it too in Arkansas.
    The President. Thank you. I appreciate that.
    Who's next?

[An Amoco employee discussed the environmental benefits of exporting 
natural gas liquids to Mexico.]

    The President. I think we ought to talk about this a minute for 
people who don't know. One of the most closed aspects of the Mexican 
economy has been the whole energy sector. And the Mexicans, as you know, 
have their own oil company, and their own oil reserves, but they have 
flared off their natural gas. They never have saved it, distributed it. 
And as a consequence, they have a lot of problems, which you just 
mentioned, especially in Mexico City.
    It may well be that in the short run the fastest growing economic 
opportunities will be in the energy area, particularly if we can figure 
out a way to get large volumes of compressed natural gas down there and 
get it into the stream of usage, as well as the other petrochemical 
products. So I thank you for talking about that. That's a huge issue and 
a big short-term winner for us.
    Who's next?
    Q. I am all for the idea of the NAFTA because it means more security 
for our jobs and our families.
    The President. What do you sell to Mexico?
    Q. Hot sauce, canned beans----
    The President. That's pretty good, they sell hot sauce to Mexico. I 
think we ought to clap for that, don't you? [Applause] Canned goods?
    Q. Canned beans.
    Q. We have five factories that produce processed food products in 
America, several of them in Louisiana and Texas. We're vitally 
interested in NAFTA because basically it opens the Mexican market to our 
company and our products. We have a processing plant in El Paso, Texas, 
that virtually has been unable to sell any of our manufactured food 
products into Mexico because of their closed-market situation, which 
began to change some 4 years ago under the Salinas government. What we 
need now is we need that to change and that opening to be completed 
under NAFTA so that the market will be totally open to us, and we will 
be able to compete on an even basis with the Mexican industry that we 
compete with.
    The President. Do you have any idea what it will do to your sales? 
Have you done any estimates on how much it will increase your markets?
    Q. Yes, we are talking millions of dollars of increased sales. And 
we're talking hundreds of jobs, possibly thousands in time to come. But 
Mexico has 80 million people, 80 million consumers who have a natural 
affinity to our products. And we think it's a great

[[Page 1769]]

potential market for our products and will be enhanced greatly under 
NAFTA.
    The President. Good for you. So you don't have--I want to get this 
straight--you have plants near the Mexican border on the American side; 
you don't have any intention of moving them. And in fact, you know 
you're going to hire more people to work there if this trade agreement 
is passed.
    Q. That's exactly right.
    The President. Thank you very much.

[A participant explained how NAFTA will benefit companies that are 
helping to alleviate environmental problems in Mexico.]

    The President. What do you produce?
    Q. We produce specialty polymers for water purification, wastewater 
treatment. We produce a lot of products and services to help our 
customers minimize pollution and to prevent pollution. And we produce 
superabsorbent polymers. We produce products that are used in the pulp 
and paper industry. All of these things would face a dramatic increase 
if the NAFTA agreement were ratified.
    The President. Have you done any estimates on how much your sales 
might increase if it passes?
    Q. I'm sure we do, but from the numbers I've seen, we know that for 
about every million dollars increase in sales resulting from NAFTA, that 
would generate about five additional jobs at NALCO, and most of those 
would be in manufacturing. And again, the Garyville plant here in 
Louisiana is our biggest plant, so it would have the most dramatic 
impact in that area.
    The President. Thank you. Go ahead.

[A participant expressed support for NAFTA because the reduction in 
tariffs would create more jobs.]

    The President. You know, I'm really glad that some of you are coming 
here who work for these companies, because we know that the only way a 
wealthy country like America can grow wealthier is if we have more 
customers, if we sell more. We know we can't just sell to each other. We 
have to open up our borders.
    And the point I want to make to the working people who are worried 
about whether they are against this or not is that anybody who wants to 
move a plant to Mexico because wages are lower or because the 
environmental standards are low can do that today. They can do it 
tomorrow. They can do it if NAFTA fails. And in fact, if the NAFTA 
agreement fails, it will be easier to move a plant to Mexico because 
wages will be lower down there and environmental standards will be 
laxer. But it will be harder for them to buy our products because they 
won't be making as much money and because we won't be able to send as 
many products in there.
    So I appreciate all of you being here, especially because in the end 
what my job is, is to find ways in a very tough world economy, where 
Europe's economy is not growing, where Japan's economy is not growing, I 
have to find ways to try to help our economy grow to create more jobs 
and higher incomes. Mexico's economy is growing. Latin America is the 
second fastest growing part of the world, next to Asia. And so I really 
appreciate the working people coming here because, in the end, the 
reason we're doing this is to provide greater security to the working 
families of this country.
    I told the Members of Congress on the way down here, and I guess I 
ought to tell all of you, as many of you know I was the Governor of your 
neighboring State to the north for 12 years. I have known people whose 
plants shut down and moved to Mexico. I've seen that happen. Believe me, 
this agreement will not make that any easier. That's going to happen or 
not happen, regardless. This agreement will make it harder because it 
will change the economics in ways that benefit both sides of the border. 
If I didn't know that, I wouldn't be out here pushing for this 
agreement.
    So I thank all of you for coming here today.
    Ron, would you like to say something?

[At this point, J. Ron Brinson, president and CEO, Board of 
Commissioners, Port Authority of New Orleans, stated that increased 
trade with Mexico will continue to produce jobs in Louisiana and that 
NAFTA may lead to a hemispheric trade agreement in the future. Gov. 
Edwin W. Edwards of Louisiana then endorsed NAFTA, stating that 
Louisiana industries would benefit from it.]


[[Page 1770]]


    The President. We are going to wrap up, but before we do, I would 
like to ask all of you to give all of these people who came up here and 
spoke a hand, because they are what this whole thing is about. 
[Applause]
    In the weeks and months ahead we are going to try to do a number of 
events like this to highlight the importance of NAFTA. But I'd like to 
ask all of you who are here from Louisiana to write to Members of 
Congress and your Senators and tell them that you support this, it means 
more jobs for your State, and you would appreciate their voting for it. 
They need to hear from you. The people who are afraid of this agreement 
are quite well organized. Some of them have a dollar or two, as you may 
know, and they need to hear from you. We just tried to give these folks 
a chance to make a direct plea today. I want everybody within the sound 
of my voice to also make your opinion known to your Representatives in 
Congress. It is up to them now.
    We need your help. It means more jobs for America. Thank you very 
much.

Note: The President spoke at 12:03 p.m. at the Port of New Orleans. In 
his remarks, he referred to Lt. Gov. Melinda Schwegmann, State treasurer 
Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, and Mayor Sidney Barthelemy of New Orleans.