[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 29, Number 36 (Monday, September 13, 1993)]
[Pages 1720-1723]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks on the Israeli-Palestinian Declaration and an Exchange With 
Reporters

 September 10, 1993

    The President. Ladies and gentleman, today marks a shining moment of 
hope for the people of the Middle East and, indeed, of the entire world. 
The Israelis and the Palestinians have now agreed upon a declaration of 
principles on interim self-government that opens the door to a 
comprehensive and lasting settlement.
    This declaration represents an historic and honorable compromise 
between two peoples who have been locked in a bloody struggle for almost 
a century. Too many have suffered for too long. The agreement is a bold 
breakthrough. The Palestinian Liberation Organization openly and 
unequivocally has renounced the use of violence and has pledged to live 
in peace with Israel. Israel, in turn, has announced its recognition of 
the PLO.
    I want to express my congratulations and praise for the courage and 
the vision displayed by the Israeli and Palestinian leadership and for 
the crucially helpful role played by Norway.
    For too long the history of the Middle East has been defined in 
terms of violence and bloodshed. Today marks the dawning of a new era. 
Now there is an opportunity to define the future of the Middle East in 
terms of reconciliation and coexistence and the opportunities that 
children growing up there will have whether they are Israeli or 
Palestinian.
    I want to express the full support of the United States for this 
dramatic and promising step. For more than a quarter of a century our 
Nation has been directly engaged in efforts to resolve the Middle East 
conflict. We have done so because it reflects our finest values and our 
deepest interests, our interests in a stable Middle East where Israelis 
and Arabs can live together in harmony and develop the potential of 
their region, which is tremendous. From Camp David to Madrid to the 
signing ceremony that will take place at the White House on Monday, 
administration after administration has facilitated this difficult but 
essential quest. From my first day in office, Secretary Christopher and 
I have made this a priority. We are resolved to continue this process to 
achieve a comprehensive Arab-Israeli resolution.
    In 1990, the United States suspended the U.S.-PLO dialog begun 2 
years earlier following an act of terrorism committed against Israel by 
a faction of the PLO. Yesterday Yasser Arafat wrote to Prime Minister 
Rabin, committing the PLO to accept Israel's right to exist in peace and 
security, to renounce terrorism, to take responsibility for the actions 
of its constituent groups, to discipline those elements who violate 
these new commitments, and to nullify key elements of the Palestinian 
covenant that denied Israel's right to exist. These PLO commitments 
justify a resumption of our dialog. As a result

[[Page 1721]]

and in light of this week's events, I have decided to resume the dialog 
and the contacts between the United States and the PLO.
    The path ahead will not be easy. These new understandings, 
impressive though they are, will not erase the fears and suspicions of 
the past. But now the Israelis and the Palestinians have laid the 
foundations of hope. The United States will continue to be a full and an 
active partner in the negotiations that lie ahead, to ensure that this 
promise of progress is fully realized.
    All the peoples of the Middle East deserve the blessings of peace. I 
pledge to join them in our help and our support to achieve that 
objective. I look forward to joining with Russia, our cosponsor in the 
Middle East peace process, and with the people of the world in 
witnessing the historic signing on Monday.
    I also want to say I am very grateful for the overwhelming support 
this agreement has generated among members of both parties in the United 
States Congress. I especially thank leaders in the Congress from both 
parties who have foreign policy responsibilities who have come to meet 
with me this morning in the White House, many of whom have stayed on for 
this statement.
    This is a time for bipartisan support for this agreement and, 
indeed, a bipartisan effort to reassert and define America's role in a 
very new world. We were talking today in our meeting about how this 
period is not unlike the late 1940's, a time in which America was the 
first nation to recognize Israel, in which we formed the United Nations 
and other international institutions in an attempt to work toward the 
world which everyone hoped would follow from World War II.
    Once again we must develop a strong philosophy and a practical set 
of institutions that can permit us to follow our values and our 
interests and to work for a more peaceful, a more humane, and a more 
democratic world. This is an enormous step toward that larger goal. And 
I think all Americans should be grateful for the opportunity that we 
have been presented to help to make this historic peace work.
    Helen [Helen Thomas, United Press International].

Recognition of Palestinians

    Q. Mr. President, does the start of the dialog with the Palestinians 
also mean that you will recognize the Palestinians as Israel has?
    The President. Well, it means that we're going to----
    Q. I mean the Palestinian entity.
    The President. I understand that. We expect to work with the 
Palestinians and the Israelis in implementing the agreement. And we 
expect the dialog to produce further and clearer expressions of our 
policy on that.
    Andrea [Andrea Mitchell, NBC News].
    Q. Mr. President, are there any circumstances under which Yasser 
Arafat might come to the ceremony? And if not, when would you expect 
that he might come to the United States and might meet with you or your 
representatives?
    The President. Well, let me say in terms of the ceremony, the people 
who will be here representing the United States and Israel--I mean, 
excuse me, the PLO and Israel--are the people that the PLO and Israel 
decide will come. That is entirely up to them. We are a sponsor of the 
peace process, and we understand that we must play a major role in 
trying to ensure its success. And the Secretary of State worked very 
hard to keep it going at difficult moments along the way in the last few 
months. But the thing that made it work was: They got together and 
agreed; they made decisions for themselves, face to face, on matters 
that they could never have taken an intermediary suggestion on because 
they were so sweeping.
    I think that's the system that works. So what I have said and what I 
communicated personally to Prime Minister Rabin is that they should 
decide who is going to show up and sign, and whoever they decide will be 
here is fine with us, and we will welcome them.
    The gentleman from Norwegian Television. I think we ought to----

Norway's Role

    Q. Mr. President, could you please elaborate on the Norwegian 
mediating role in this process? And then, one more question: How and 
when were you informed about the secret process going on in Oslo?

[[Page 1722]]

    The President. Well, we had been aware for some time. I don't 
remember the exact date, but we've known for quite a while about the 
discussions in Norway. But frankly, we didn't want to know much of the 
details because the people were talking to each other.
    I will say again, I think that's what made this agreement possible. 
If they had tried to do some of the things they had done in public, I 
think the constituencies of both sides would have made it virtually 
impossible for the agreement to be made. And I think that the world is 
indebted to Norway for providing a genuine opportunity for face-to-face 
and totally private and honest and open consultations.
    It was made possible, I think, by the fact that we were able to keep 
the formal process going here. Many of the ideas embraced by the parties 
directly were ones discussed here, but which could not be agreed to in a 
public forum. So I think the world owes Norway a great debt of 
gratitude, and I think the people of the Middle East do as well.
    Brit [Brit Hume, ABC News].

U.S. Role in the Peace Process

    Q. Mr. President, you spoke of the need for a strong philosophy to 
guide the United States and its friends in this new atmosphere. Can you 
give us a sense of what some of the touchstones, some of the essence of 
that strong philosophy in your view should be?
    The President. Well, first of all, after the end of the cold war, we 
know from just a cursory reading of any morning newspaper that the end 
of danger and misery and difficulty and oppression has far from passed 
from the face of the Earth. The United States still has interests and 
values which compel us to support peace, the absence of oppression, the 
recognition of human rights both on an individual and a group basis and, 
wherever possible, democracy. And I believe that while we must work with 
our friends and neighbors and allies through multilateral organizations 
as much as possible, the leadership of the United States is still 
absolutely essential to bring many of these conflicts to a successful 
conclusion.
    That does not answer all the specific details about any particular 
area, but it is clear to me that for the foreseeable future, we have a 
unique role which we must assume, and it is very much in our interests 
as well as consistent with our values to do it.
    Rita [Rita Braver, CBS News].

Bolstering the Agreement

    Q. Mr. President, can you tell us what you might do to discourage 
radical elements that might try to sabotage this agreement?
    The President. Well, I think I should answer that in more 
affirmative terms. What we're going to try to do is to generate as much 
support for this agreement as possible, not just in the United States 
and throughout the world but also in the Middle East, within the Arab 
States, within the Palestinian communities, within our friends in 
Israel. We believe that to the extent we can show leadership and work 
with others who are interested in supporting this--and I want to 
emphasize we've gotten clear expressions of interest and support for 
implementing this agreement from the Europeans, from the Japanese, from 
Norway and the other Scandinavian countries, from the Gulf countries, 
from many of the Arab States--to whatever extent we can show that this 
can work and can lead from here to a more comprehensive resolution of 
the other issues still rending the Middle East, I think that will tend 
to undermine the ability of any specific group to derail this process.
    Press Secretary Myers. One more question.
    Q. Can I follow on that?
    The President. Yes.

Security Issues

    Q. Will the United States support a U.N. force in the Gaza Strip if 
necessary, and specifically, what will the U.S. do to help ensure the 
security of Israel and the Palestinian entity?
    The President. Well, that has to be worked out by the parties. There 
will plainly be some peace guarantees. Through what mechanism it's not 
clear. There were some after Camp David, and I would point out that they 
worked very, very well. Most people are probably not even aware of the 
longstanding presence of American forces in a multilateral context in 
the Middle East in the aftermath of Camp David because it did work so 
well. But no specific decisions have been made.

[[Page 1723]]

That has to be worked out with the parties, and they'll bring a proposal 
to us, and we'll be working with them all along the way. And you will 
know it as it develops. But we've not made a specific decision, and it 
would be inappropriate for me to speculate about it now.
    Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 10:16 a.m. in the Rose Garden at the White 
House.