[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 29, Number 15 (Monday, April 19, 1993)]
[Pages 592-595]
[Online from the Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

<R04>
Remarks to Law Enforcement Organizations and an Exchange With Reporters

 April 15, 1993

    The President. Good afternoon. Ladies and gentlemen, 2 months ago I 
presented a comprehensive plan to reduce our national deficit and to 
increase our investment in the American people, their jobs, and their 
economic future. The Federal budget plan passed Congress in record time 
and created a new sense of hope and opportunity in the country. Then the 
short-term jobs plan I presented to Congress, which would create a half 
a million jobs in the next 2 years, passed the House of Representatives 
2 weeks ago. It now has the support of a majority of the United States 
Senate.
    All of these Members of Congress know it's time to get the economy 
moving again, to get job growth going again, to get a fast start on the 
investments we need to build a lasting prosperity. Unfortunately, a 
minority of the Members of the United States Senate have used gridlock 
tactics to prevent their colleagues from working the will of the 
majority on the jobs bill.
    When Congress returns, I ask every Senator from every State and from 
both parties to remember what is at stake. The issue is not politics, 
it's people. Sixteen million of

[[Page 593]]

them are looking for full-time jobs and can't find them. These men and 
women don't care about who's up or down in Washington. They care about 
paying the rent and meeting the mortgage payment, about putting food on 
the table and buying shoes for their children, about regaining a sense 
of dignity that comes from doing a day's work and supporting their 
families and drawing a paycheck. They're asking those of us who have the 
privilege of serving to put aside politics and do something now to move 
our economy forward.
    I am prepared to do that. And I have been working with the Senate to 
come up with an adjusted package that meets some of the concerns of 
those who've been blocking action on the jobs plan. I'm willing to 
compromise, so long as we keep the focus on jobs, keep the focus on 
growth, and keep the focus on meeting unmet national needs.
    Our opponents have been asking for a smaller package. Today I ask 
them to join me in determining exactly what kind and what size package 
Congress can approve that actually meets the needs of the American 
people.
    But even as we make those reductions, and the package will be 
smaller, I believe we must address problems that are on the minds of 
millions of Americans, and one in particular, and that is the need to 
toughen law enforcement in our society to deal with the dramatic rise in 
violent crime.
    So I will ask, even in this reduced package, for an additional $200 
million in Federal funding to help local communities to rehire police 
officers who have been laid off because of the fiscal problems caused by 
the national recession. Together with a matching effort by local 
governments, this could put as many as 10,000 police officers back on 
the job and back on the beat in communities all across our Nation. At a 
time when too many of our people live in fear of violent crime, when too 
many businesses have closed and too many people have lost their jobs 
because people are afraid to leave their homes, rehiring thousands of 
officers is one of the best investments America can make. And I ask both 
Houses of Congress to make that investment in our people's safety and in 
their peace of mind.
    I believe in the need for strong Federal action to keep the economy 
going toward recovery and to create jobs. Make no mistake about it: I 
will fight for these priorities as hard as I ever have. I will never 
forget that the people sent me here to fight for their jobs, their 
future, and for fundamental change.
    I want to thank the police officers who are here today and tell you 
that not a single one of them knew before they came here that I had 
determined to ask for more money in this jobs bill to rehire police 
officers. They came here because they believe in the summer jobs portion 
of the package. And I want them to be free to talk about that. They came 
here not out of any law enforcement concern other than the fact that 
they wanted the kids in this country to have a chance to have jobs this 
summer, to have safer streets and a brighter and more peaceful future.
    I say what I say today not just because it's good for law 
enforcement but because it's good for the people who live in these 
communities. I have always supported community policing, not only 
because it helps to prevent crime and to lower the crime rate but 
because it cements better relationships between people in law 
enforcement and the people that they're hired to protect. It reduces the 
chances of abusive action by police officers and increases the chances 
of harmony and safe streets at the same time.
    These are the kinds of things that we are trying to do. I promised 
in my campaign that I'd do everything I could to put another 100,000 
police officers on the street over the next 4 years. This makes a good 
downpayment on that. This keeps in mind the core of the jobs package. 
And this will help us to move forward.
    So I ask the people in the Senate who have blocked the jobs bill, 
let's work together. I can accept a reduced package if you will increase 
your commitment to safe streets. I do not accept the fact that we should 
reduce our commitment to summer jobs or to building our infrastructure 
or to doing those other things that will create real and lasting 
prosperity for our people. I have done my part now to end the gridlock; 
I ask you to do yours.

[[Page 594]]

    I want now to give the people who are here with me on the platform a 
chance to make some remarks and to be heard by the American people, 
beginning with Janet Reno, the distinguished Attorney General.

[At this point, Attorney General Reno and the leaders of four police 
organizations made statements.]

Value Added Tax

    Q. Mr. President, can you tell us, do you think that the jobs 
package could be put in further jeopardy by controversy over the 
suggestion of a VAT tax at this point in the congressional dialog?

    The President. Oh, no, not at all. I think it should have--they 
wouldn't have any relationship one to the other. First of all, I've made 
absolutely no decision on that. You should know that there's a lot of 
support in the business community and the labor community. People have 
asked us to consider that because of the enormous burden of the present 
system on many of our major employers, particularly many of those that 
we depend upon to generate jobs and to carry the strength of this 
economy. But I have made absolutely no decision that would even approach 
that, on that or any other kind of general tax.

    Q. Do you personally believe that the American public is ready to 
have another tax to pay for health care? I mean, apart from what 
business and labor leaders have said----

    The President. I'm not going to speculate on that. I will say this: 
The real issue is how quickly we could recycle the benefits of all the 
savings to cover the cost. Everyone knows that if you do what we're 
proposing to do, if you streamline the insurance system, if you fix the 
system so that there's no longer an enormous economic incentive to 
overutilize or overprovide certain services, if you provide primary and 
preventive care in places where it isn't now, every single analysis 
shows absolutely massive savings to the health care system. The real 
question is whether you can transfer those savings to cover those who 
have no coverage now or those who have virtually no coverage so that you 
provide people the security.

    I have no idea. The polls say that, but I don't know. All I know is 
the polls that I see in the press, that many of you have commissioned, 
they say overwhelmingly the American people want the security of an 
affordable health care system.

    But I don't think that has anything to do with this stimulus, and it 
certainly shouldn't have. People want a job first and foremost. They 
want that more than anything else.
    Yes.

Stimulus Program

    Q. Now that you've announced your willingness to compromise on the 
stimulus package, can you tell us what parts of your package you 
consider vital and uncompromisable? I assume summer jobs is one.

    The President. I want the summer jobs, I want the highway program, 
and I want the police program. Let me say this: I still intend to fully 
and aggressively push the crime bill, which did not pass the Congress 
last year. This is a supplement to that, not a substitute for it in any 
way. But I think we need to do that.

    I think we need the Ryan White funds because of the enormous health 
care burdens to the communities that are inordinately and 
disproportionately affected by the problems of caring for people with 
AIDS. And there are several other things that I think should be done. We 
have to do the Agriculture Department meat inspectors; the safety of the 
public depends on that.

    I don't think any of it should be cut, but I have given Senator 
Mitchell and Senator Byrd--I've talked to them. And Senator Dole called 
me yesterday to discuss this, and I told him that I would call him back. 
I called him back last night in New Hampshire, and we discussed this. 
And I basically asked them to talk today and said that I would not make 
any statements about any specifics until at least they had a chance to 
talk to see whether or not they could reach some accord.

    So I don't want to be any more specific than I have been already. 
And let's see if they can talk it out.

[[Page 595]]

    Yes.
    Q. When you talked to Senator Dole and Senator Mitchell did you tell 
them about your--[inaudible]--increase also, that $200 million, that you 
want that as part of the package?
    The President. I did. I left word for Senator Mitchell last night 
about it. When I talked to Senator Dole--I don't remember for sure--I do 
not believe I mentioned it. But I did tell him that I was prepared to 
reduce the package and I wanted to break the gridlock. And I told him 
that I was working on a reformulation of it in the hope that it would 
become even more focused on jobs and the kinds of issues that I thought 
the American people wanted us to address. And this is certainly 
consistent with that.
    Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 2:52 p.m. in the Rose Garden at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Robert T. Scully, executive 
director, National Association of Police Organizations; Raymond McGrath, 
president, International Brotherhood of Police Officers; Robert B. 
Kliesmet, president, International Union of Police Associations; and 
Dewey R. Stokes, national president, Fraternal Order of Police.