[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2008, Book II)]
[October 21, 2008]
[Pages 1327-1335]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]
Remarks at the White House Summit on International Development
October 21, 2008
Thank you all. Madam President, I
could not think of anybody better to give me dancing lessons than you.
[Laughter] We love you. I love your spirit; I love your leadership; I
love the example you set for leaders all across the globe. And it's an
honor to be here with you.
And it's an honor to be here with you all. I welcome you to the
White House Summit on International Development. It's a summit to herald
the outstanding work being done to lift up souls in need. I appreciate
the fact that folks in this room represent thousands that are replacing
disease with health, dependency with self-reliance, and despair with
hope.
The people gathered here come from different countries--I see we
represent different professions--but we're united by our commitment to
charting a new era in development. Today I'm going to talk with you
about this new philosophy, about the way it's transforming countries and
saving lives, and about why it's essential to continue in the years
ahead.
Before I do so, I want to recognize not only the President, but her son Robert. I suspect your mother tells you what to do like my
mother tells me what to do. [Laughter] As a
matter of fact, your mother tells me what to do. [Laughter] Welcome.
[[Page 1328]]
Congressman Donald Payne, we're sure
proud you're here; thank you, Mr. Chairman, for coming. Much of the
success of the programs we've implemented are due to, one, the
generosity of the American people, but also the fine group of people
that are implementers: Henrietta Fore, the
Administrator of USAID; Rob Mosbacher, president and CEO of OPIC; Ambassador John
Danilovich, Millennium Challenge
Corporation CEO; Ambassador Mark Dybul, U.S.
Global AIDS Coordinator; and Rear Admiral Tim Ziemer, U.S. Malaria Coordinator. Thank you all for being
leaders.
The second choice to introduce me was Bob Geldof, musician. Of course, he'd have got up and said, ``I
saw him try to sing while in Africa.'' [Laughter] I've come to really
appreciate Bob Geldof. He is a genuine person who has used his fame to
help others in need, and it is a--it's been a joy to work with you. And
you know, you and I might look differently, but I think we share the
same compassion and the same hopes. And thank you for joining us today.
I want to thank the panelists who have participated in this
conference. I do want to welcome members of the diplomatic corps; thank
you all for coming by today.
You know, we meet today in the middle of a serious global financial
crisis. Over the past few weeks, we have seen how the world's economies
are more interconnected than ever before. The crisis is having a major
impact on working people all over the world, including many in
developing nations.
During times of economic crisis, some may be tempted to turn inward,
focusing on our problems here at home, while ignoring our interests
around the world. This would be a serious mistake. America is committed,
and America must stay committed, to international development for
reasons that remain true regardless of the ebb and flow of the markets.
We believe that development is in America's security interests. We
face an enemy that can't stand freedom. And the only way they can
recruit to their hateful ideology is by exploiting despair, and the best
way to respond is to spread hope.
We believe that we ought to remain committed to development because
it's in our long-term economic interests. When America helps developing
nations rise out of poverty, we create new markets for our goods and
services and better jobs for American workers.
And we're committed to development because it's in our moral
interests. I strongly believe in the timeless truth, to whom much is
given, much is required. We are a blessed nation, and I believe we have
a duty to help those less fortunate around the world. We believe that
power to save lives comes with the obligation to use it. And I believe
our Nation is better when we help people fight hunger and disease and
illiteracy.
For all of these reasons, this administration has made international
development one of our biggest priorities. As the President mentioned, we've worked with partner nations--
as well as the World Bank and the IMF and the African Development Bank
and the Inter-American Development Bank--to relieve tens of billions of
dollars in debt from some of the world's poorest nations. By relieving
crushing debt burdens, it gives people hope. We've also worked with
wealthier nations to provide aid in the form of grants instead of loans.
For the past 8 years, the United States has provided more foreign
assistance than at any time in the past half century.
We're using this aid to foster sustainable economic growth and
promote good governance and advance a model of true partnership that
gives poor nations a real stake in their own development. We're
encouraging volunteer organizations, local charities, and the faith
community to take on an even greater role, because we strongly believe
that they offer compassion that no
[[Page 1329]]
government can offer. Most of all, we're insisting on accountability in
return for our assistance, so we can ensure that our generosity leads to
measurable results. You know, for too long, foreign aid was designed to
make us feel good. Now we're ensuring that our resources do good.
This new approach to development is embodied by a revolutionary
initiative called the Millennium Challenge Account. See, this program
says that the United States will help, but we expect countries that we
help to fight corruption and to govern justly. There's nothing more
pitiful than to have people's hopes robbed by corrupt government
officials. We say to those we want to help, support open markets to
trade and investment, and above all, invest in your people's health and
education. You see, by tying our aid to these policies, we are
encouraging developing nations to make tough economic and political and
social reforms. We encourage leaders to respect their citizens, uphold
human dignity, and work to earn the trust of their people. This approach
is based on a clear conviction: People in the developing world have the
capacity to improve their own lives, and they will rise to meet high
standards.
I refuse to accept the development model that says, oh, these people
are doomed forever, let's just throw money at the problem. We believe
that if you set high standards, good people will rise to meet those
standards, regardless of where they live in the world. So the Millennium
Challenge Account is a robust program that has invested $6.7 billion in
35 countries around the world. From Albania to Moldova to Indonesia to
Mongolia to Paraguay to Peru, these partnerships are helping developing
nations take charge of their future and, more importantly, unleash the
talents of their people.
For example, this February, President Kikwete of Tanzania and I signed a 5-year, nearly $700 million
compact to improve the country's transportation, energy, and water
supply. It's pretty basic needs, isn't it: transportation, energy, and
water supply? The partnership will build roads that connect rural
Tanzanians to markets and schools and health clinics. It's hard to have
a modern society if you can't get your product from rural to urban
centers in your country. It's hard to get doctors to help people in the
rural part of the country if you don't have roads to connect health care
clinics to those in need. It's going to extend electricity to homes and
businesses in some of the most remote areas of the country. It will
increase access to clean drinking water, which will help reduce
preventable diseases, especially in young children. Through these
projects, the Millennium Challenge compact is helping Tanzania build a
foundation for success in the 21st century, showing the promise of a new
era in development.
In the new era of development, America and our partners are helping
to meet basic human needs like food and clean water. There's nothing
more basic than food and clean water. Since 2002, the United States has
provided more than $16 billion in food assistance, helping to ensure
that tens of millions of people around the world do not go hungry. In
response to the current global food crisis, we've committed $5.5 billion
to address global hunger over the next 2 years. And that's important.
These are stopgap measures. The American people care when they hear
people are going hungry around the world. And I want to thank the
American people for their generosity.
But as we work to resolve the crisis in the long run, we have got to
find better solutions for global hunger in the long term. In the short
run, we're helping; in the long term, we're developing a strategy and
working with partners to help them grow their own food. There's no other
way to put it. The best long-term policy for the United States is to
help nations develop their own agricultural industry, so we don't have
to deal with global food crisis year in and year out.
[[Page 1330]]
And so we supply poor and rural farmers with fertilizer and water
management systems. We distribute better seeds that will boost yields
and invest in research that will make crops like rice and wheat more
resistant to drought and pests. You know, one of the really important
challenges that this administration has taken on, and future
administrations must take on, is to say to other markets around the
world, it is okay to import markets to--crops grown with biotechnology.
A lot of countries are resistant upon introducing these new
technologically advanced crops, because they fear they're not going to
be able to sell their crops elsewhere. And yet these crops will help
people realize a vibrant agricultural industry.
I believe that as the United States moves forward, we ought to
purchase up to a quarter of our food from local farmers. In other words,
of all the food aid we get we ought to take a quarter of that,
Donald, and purchase the food directly from
local farmers. If it's in our interest to help build a local
agricultural industry, then instead of just giving food, we ought to
purchase food from the farmers themselves, to help build a vibrant
agricultural sector in parts of the world where food is desperately
needed. I support the World Bank's strategy to increase investment in
agriculture.
What I'm telling you is there's a better way than just a kind of
patchwork approach. It's an approach that basically says we can use our
technological advancement and our expertise to help build vibrant
agricultural industries in nations where there ought to be crops today.
The United States works with partner nations to deal with the lack
of clean water. Last year, we dedicated nearly a billion dollars to
improve sanitation and water supplies in developing nations. We're also
wise enough to enlist the private sector to help as well.
I want to share with you an interesting program--for two reasons,
one, it's interesting, and two, my wife thought
of it--[laughter]--or has actually been involved with it. She didn't
think of it, but she thought of it for this speech. She has been
involved with a public-private partnership called the PlayPumps
Alliance. It brings together international foundations and corporations
and the U.S. Government. Now, catch this: PlayPumps are children's
merry-go-rounds attached to a water pump and a storage tank. When the
wheel turns, clean drinking water is produced. And as my good wife says,
``PlayPumps are fueled by a limitless energy source--[laughter]--
children at play.''
The United States is working with our partners to install 4,000
pumps in schools and communities across sub-Sahara Africa, which will
provide clean drinking water to as many as 10 million people. It's not
that hard to help people get clean drinking water. It takes focus,
imagination, and effort. And I call upon all nations around the world to
join us.
In the new era of development, America and our partners recognize
that education is the gateway to prosperity and essential to any
society's long-term success. It's pretty obvious, isn't it? If people
are educated, they can read the instructions on a medicine bottle. They
can keep receipts for a small business. They can learn about the rights
and privileges they have under their country's constitutions. Yet too
many people can't read. America and our partners are determined to
extend the promise of good education to more people in the developing
world.
In the Middle East, USAID has partnered with local officials to
start kindergartens in Jordan, taught hundreds of thousands of children
about information technology in Morocco, built 70 schools for girls in
Egypt.
Through our Africa Education Initiative, as the President mentioned, the United States has trained more
than 700,000 teachers. I think you said a million teachers? Yes, I'll go
for a million then. [Laughter] Somewhere between 700 and a million.
[[Page 1331]]
[Laughter] Distributed more than 10 million textbooks--somewhere between
10 million and 15 million--and provided hundreds of thousands of
scholarships to help girls go to school.
Last year, I announced a new initiative that will devote $425
million to improve education in Ethiopia and Ghana and Honduras and
Liberia and Mali and Yemen. Why? Why do we do that? Because the truth of
the matter is, we want children to fulfill their God-given potential;
that's why we do that. And so we're helping to train the doctors and the
lawyers and the engineers and entrepreneurs and the women presidents who
will be vital to the future of the developing world.
In the new era of development, America and our partners are helping
to lift the burden of deadly disease. In Africa, the treatable and
preventable disease of malaria kills one child every 30 seconds. So in
2005, I launched a 5-year, $1.2 billion initiative that cut the number
of malaria-related deaths in 15 African nations by half.
Through the initiative, we joined with African governments--notice,
``we joined with African governments''--to design malaria control
strategies that will work with their nations. We expect results for the
money we spend. And yet we're confident when we work with governments
that they can develop the strategy necessary to achieve the objectives.
And so we supply the money, and our partner nations work to distribute
insecticide-treated bed nets, conduct indoor spraying campaigns, and
provide cutting-edge drugs.
The interesting thing about this initiative is, it's easy to measure
whether or not we're being successful. In the new development agenda,
results matter a lot. And therefore, when the United States works with
countries, we expect there to be a well-defined strategy and the ability
to measure whether or not our money is working. I don't think that's too
much to ask, nor do the people who are trying to help think that's too
much to ask.
So far, our efforts have reached 25 million people. In places like
Zambia and Ethiopia and Rwanda and Zanzibar, the numbers of people sick
or dying from malaria have dropped dramatically. We have not only made
progress around the edges, we've made dramatic progress in saving lives.
I find that the work to defeat malaria is exciting work and it is
inspiring work. And frankly, it's not all that hard to design a strategy
to get bed nets to people. And I want to thank my fellow citizens for
caring deeply about this initiative. And I want to thank our partners
for working hard to make sure that a mom won't have to worry about her
child dying because of a mosquito bite.
The President talked about our
fight against HIV/AIDS. And it's a noble battle, and it's a necessary
battle. In 2003, as she had mentioned, we launched PEPFAR. The program
is the largest commitment by any nation to combat a single disease in
human history. Ambassador Dybul and I believe
that the program is effective because it is defined by a few key
principles. You know, if you're going to have a new era of development,
it's important to have clear definitions. It's one thing just to throw
money at the problem, it's another thing to insist upon strategies that
actually work. So the emergency plan demands specific measurable targets
for progress. His job is to not only put the implementers in place and
to find those souls who are on the frontlines of saving lives and
empower them, his job is to report back to the President and say, ``Here
is the progress we're making, Mr. President.'' That way it gives me a
chance to say, ``Well, if you're not making enough progress, Mark, do
something differently, please.''
It employs a prevention strategy that works: ABC, which means
abstinence, be faithful, and use condoms. This isn't guesswork; this is
a program that is working. It puts local partners in the lead, because
they know the needs of their people best.
[[Page 1332]]
It enlists new partners from the international community, the private
sector, and the faith community.
I can't tell you how many people that I've met in the United States
who say, ``I'm part of PEPFAR because my church has adopted the
program.'' You know, there's nothing better than having people who hear
the universal call to love a brother like you'd like to be loved
yourselves on the frontline of helping to save lives.
And the United States Government is smart enough to enlist the
compassion and love and hard work of people in the faith community in
the United States to help our brothers and sisters in need. So far, the
results are striking. When we launched the initiative in 2003, only
50,000 people in sub-Sahara Africa were receiving antiretroviral
treatment.
Today, we support treatment for nearly 1.7 million people in the
region and tens of thousands of more around the world, from Asia to the
Caribbean to Eastern Europe. PEPFAR has supported care for nearly 7
million people, including millions of orphans and vulnerable children.
PEPFAR has allowed nearly 200,000 children in Africa to be born HIV-
free. PEPFAR is working. And I want to thank the United States Congress
for coming together to reauthorize and dramatically expand this program.
I'm sure that many of you had the same experiences that Laura and I have had in meeting people whose lives have been
touched by the initiatives we're talking about today. I'll never forget
meeting Harriet Namutebi. She is--we met
her in Africa on our trip 5 years ago. She lost her brother, her
husband, and one of her children to AIDS. She was diagnosed, she locked
herself in her room, she refused to eat, and she wanted to die.
But at a clinic supported by PEPFAR, Harriet was given a new lease on life. Counselors at the
clinic showed Harriet how to live positively with HIV. A loving soul
took this person who was in despair and said, ``Here's a chance for
you.''
Thanks to the antiretroviral treatments Harriet received, she is now in good health. She cares for
four children. She is an enthusiastic member of the clinic's drama
group, which educates others about HIV. She is living proof of what
people in Africa call the Lazarus effect: Communities once given up for
dead are now being brought back to life. And it is a joy to be a part of
PEPFAR.
In the new era of development, we are working with partners to
unleash the greatest engine of prosperity the world has ever known, and
that is free trade. For developing nations, the value of trade is nearly
40 times the value of foreign aid. Let me repeat that: For developing
nations, the value of trade is 40 times the value of foreign aid. Isn't
that an interesting statistic? What should that tell you? It says, if
you're interested in helping the developing world, promote trade. That's
what it ought to tell you.
According to the World Bank, the complete elimination of barriers to
trading goods would boost annual income in developing countries by more
than $140 billion. I think that would go a long way, don't you, Madam
President?
You know, trade opens growth, ignites growth, but it also produces
other benefits. It helps increase transparency; it helps increase the
rule of law. During my administration, we have worked hard to reduce
barriers to trade and investment. When I took office, we had free trade
agreements in effect with three nations. Today, we have them with 14
nations; most of them are developing countries. We've also--[applause].
My predecessor, President Clinton,
did a smart thing with the African Growth and Opportunity Act. My
administration had the honor of extending that act. In 2005, I worked
with Congress to pass a free trade agreement with the Dominican Republic
and nations in Central America; it's called
[[Page 1333]]
CAFTA. And although it's still in its early stages, trade between
participating countries with the U.S. is up 30 percent since its
enactment. Do you know what that means? That means more jobs for workers
in those countries. It means more food for families. It means more
investment that developing countries need to grow and prosper. That's
what that means.
Trade is essential to prosperity in both good economic times and
bad. During periods of crisis, like the one we're in now, protectionism
may seem like the best way to safeguard wealth. But when major economies
try to wall themselves off, they deny themselves the growth that comes
from exports and deepen poverty by depriving poor nations of vital
markets for their goods. You see, in the midst of this crisis, I believe
the world ought to send a clear signal that we remain committed to open
markets by reducing barriers to trade across the globe. The recent
impasse in the Doha round of trade talks is disappointing, but that
doesn't have to be the final world--word. And so before I leave office,
I'm going to press hard to make sure we have a successful Doha round.
In this new era of development, countries that make the courageous
choice to embrace democracy must realize the economic benefits that go
with it. When young democracies do not deliver improvements in their
peoples' daily lives, the people start to lose faith in free societies.
That's a fact.
For example, let's talk about our own neighborhood. I believe it's
in our interest that we have a good, sound neighborhood. It's in our
interest our neighborhood prosper and get along. And we've seen hopeful
advances for democracy and free enterprise in North and South America.
There's no doubt about it: There's been some amazing advances. Yet
there's also voices that challenge free markets and democratic values--
quite loud voices. Some of them have gained a following, because amid
the progress in our hemisphere, we also see terrible want. What the
campesinos and trabajadores want is--what they don't need is false
populism; what they do need is social justice. And the development aid
of the United States has been focused on providing social justice in our
neighborhood.
True social justice requires creating new opportunities for
prosperity and upward mobility. So working in partnership with Latin
American nations, we've helped more than 400,000 poor and disadvantaged
children learn to read. We've increased economic opportunity by
relieving debt and opening trade, as I mentioned. We've delivered aid
that empowers the poor and the marginalized. Since I took office, with
support from the Congress, the United States has provided nearly $15
billion to the region with a special focus on helping the poor.
True social justice requires government institutions that are fair
and effective and free from corruption. You can't have social justice if
your government is stealing from you. Since 2001, the United States has
doubled our worldwide commitment to programs that foster democracy and
good government, including programs in Latin America. We've entered into
the Millennium Challenge Account agreements with six nations in Latin
America and the Caribbean, and a number of other countries are pursuing
compacts.
We've worked with countries like El Salvador to train law
enforcement officers who can combat criminal gangs. Mexico, we're
partnering with the Government to stop smugglers who traffic in
everything from guns to human beings. Colombia, we've worked closely
with President Uribe to defeat the
cocaine cartels and narcoterrorists. By the way, it is no coincidence
last year that Colombia's economy saw its largest growth in nearly three
decades, because that country has got a strong leader willing to take on
the FARC.
True social justice requires compassion. And some of the greatest
work of compassion in Latin America is being done by the United States
military. I don't know
[[Page 1334]]
if you ever heard of the Navy hospital ship called the Comfort, but it
sailed to 12 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean last year.
Doctors treated tens of thousands of poor patients and conducted more
than 26,000 surgeries. Dentists and hygienists filled cavities and cared
for infections and treated young children. These men and women are
showing that the nations of Latin America have a strong partner in the
United States of America. They're a part of our efforts to show that the
institutions of freedom and capitalism and democracy are not threats to
be feared, but the surest path to social justice there is.
From fostering good governance and reform to alleviating hunger and
disease to advancing education, prosperity, and justice, our new
approach to development has shown inspiring signs of success. Yet this
success can be reversed, and the cost of abandoning our commitments
would be far higher than the cost of fulfilling them. So I urge both
parties in Congress to ensure that our development efforts remain an
enduring priority of the United States.
I call on other members of the G-8 and the United Nations, as well
as our fellow contributors to the Global Fund, to follow through on
their pledges. Corporations and foundations have shared their resources
and expertise with the developing world, and I urge them to continue
their generosity. Faith-based groups have done amazing work to heal the
sick and lift up the suffering, and I urge them to carry on their
missions of mercy.
It's amazing what individual Americans have done to help with our--
the new era of development. I got a Christmas gift from one of my little
nephews, which was mosquito nets. Thousands of individuals and
schoolchildren in--all across the country are donating $10 to buy a
mosquito net to help save a life. There are people who are raising money
for HIV/AIDS initiative. There are people who are going on a service
mission with their house of worship. These folks are making a huge
contribution, and I urge them to continue their good work.
History shows what happens when America combines our great
compassion with our steadfast determination. We are a compassionate
people, and we are a determined people. During a recent visit, a good
friend of mine shared his vivid childhood memories of the Marshall plan.
We were sitting--standing on the South Lawn. He said he'll never forget
the kindness America showed his nation in a time of need, and now that
man is the Prime Minister of Italy. And last week, Silvio Berlusconi
expressed his enduring loyalty and gratitude to the people of the United
States.
It's not hard to imagine what fruits our compassion will yield 60
years from today. We can see it in the faces of Afghan girls going to
school for the first time. We can see them in the proud eyes of Latin
American workers providing for themselves and for their families. We see
them in the joy of new African mothers whose babies are protected from
malaria and HIV. We see them in the outpouring of thanks throughout the
developing world. I'm just so sorry that not every American could have
been with Laura and me and see what we saw in our
trip to Africa last year. Schoolchildren sang songs about America's
generosity. One shop-owner, I think who was in Liberia, Madam
President, painted his stall in our
Nation's colors. Tens of thousands of people lined the roadsides during
our visit, cheering and waving American flags in gratitude to the
American people.
I'm honored to be the President of such a nation filled with people
of such generosity and goodness. I'm proud to join with all of you in
ushering in a new era of development. This is an historic commitment
that we all can be proud of, one that will secure a bright future for
our partners in the developing world, one that will make America a
better place. God bless you.
[[Page 1335]]
Note: The President spoke at 1:22 p.m. at the Ronald Reagan Building and
International Trade Center. In his remarks, he referred to President
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia, who introduced the President. He also
referred to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).