[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2008, Book I)]
[March 12, 2008]
[Pages 354-361]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks to the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
March 12, 2008

    Gracias. Thank you. Sientese. Gracias mi amigo, David. Thank you for having me back yet again to speak. 
This is an opportunity de practicar mi Espanol. [Laughter] Of course, a 
lot of people say I ought to be spending more time practicing my 
English. [Laughter] But I'm thrilled to be with you.
    I really love the entrepreneurial spirit in all communities. And 
it's evident in the Latino community. As you know, I'm blessed to be a 
Texan, and I got to see firsthand, as Governor, the unbelievable 
initiative and drive of Hispanics who lived in my State. And it's the 
same thing all across the country. And so part of the purpose for me to 
come is to thank you for your helping others realize the blessings of 
owning a small business; thanks for creating jobs, thanks for setting 
good examples, and thanks for being my friend.
    David, as you know, I've been to the 
Hispanic Chamber, I think this is my third time, but I know a lot of you 
personally. And this may be my farewell address to the Hispanic Chamber 
as President, but it's

[[Page 355]]

certainly not going to be my farewell to you as a friend.
    I thank not only David but Augie 
Martinez. I thank the directors of the 
Hispanic Chamber. I thank my old buddy, Hector Barreto, who is here with us, who--[applause]--Michael 
Barrera, thank you both. Appreciate you, 
Miguel.
    And then there are members of my Cabinet who have come because today 
I'm going to discuss with you a very serious issue, an issue that 
matters a lot to your future and the future of this country. And so I 
welcome Secretary of Defense Bob Gates, 
Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson, Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer, Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez. Elaine Chao, Secretary of 
Labor, is with us. Susan Schwab of the 
USTR--Trade Representative is with us. This is not a Cabinet meeting. 
[Laughter]
    These are people who are here to put an exclamation point on the 
subject I'm going to discuss with you today. And so I thank you all for 
coming. I appreciate your time.
    I also want to welcome Carolina Barco, who is the Ambassador from Colombia, and other 
members of the diplomatic corps that have joined us.
    A lot has changed since I first spoke to this group. I had to face 
some very difficult spending decisions, and I've had to conduct 
sensitive diplomacy. That's called planning for a wedding. [Laughter] La 
boda--[laughter]--de mi ninita. [Laughter]
    I really appreciate the fact that we work together. I just want to 
review a couple of issues that have made a difference. First of all, we 
worked together to launch a period of sustained economic growth. I 
remember meeting with some right after the attacks, and we were 
wondering whether or not our economy could withstand a terrorist attack. 
After all, a recession was in place just as I came into office; then the 
terrorists attacked; then we had corporate scandals.
    And a lot of folks were wondering whether or not this economy would 
be resilient enough to withstand those pressures. And it turns out, it 
was. And I want to thank you very much for supporting the tax cuts plans 
that had good effect on small businesses all across the United States 
during that period of time. I think when people take a look back at this 
moment in our economic history, they'll recognize tax cuts work. They 
have made a difference.
    And this is what we're doing again. We've entered another period of 
difficult times. I am confident in the long term for the United States 
economy. I know we're resilient. I know we're entrepreneurial. I know 
we'll withstand these times. I want to thank you for supporting the 
economic stimulus package that we passed, which provides strong 
incentives for small businesses to expand and will put money into the 
pockets of the people who earned it.
    Secretary Paulson has assured me--
and I--he's a can-do guy--that the checks will be coming into the mail 
in the second week of May. The other thing I do want to assure you of is 
that if Congress tries to raise taxes, I'm going to veto it. We don't 
need tax increases.
    I appreciate your strong support on No Child Left Behind. We agreed 
that a system that just simply moves children through without measuring 
is inexcusable. You recognized early that many Latino kids were denied, 
you know, the great promise of America because they didn't get the good 
education that we expect. And so we confronted this business about 
giving up on kids early. We demand accountability. We spent more money. 
But in return for the increased money, we expect schools to measure, and 
we expect schools to correct problems early, before it's too late.
    No Child Left Behind is working. We've measured. Fourth grade--
Hispanic fourth graders have set new records when it comes to reading 
and math. So rather than weakening No Child Left Behind, the United 
States Congress needs to strengthen

[[Page 356]]

No Child Left Behind for the sake of all our children. And I want to 
thank you for your support.
    A Federal contracting process is open to more small and minority-
owned businesses, thanks to our SBA guys who have been running the show, 
Steve and Hector. And we'll continue that practice of making sure that 
there's fairness when it comes to Federal contracting.
    I appreciate your support on immigration law. I'm sorry that--
[applause]--you know, I'm disappointed that Congress missed a good 
opportunity to uphold our values and uphold our laws at the same time. 
And I'm confident that the day will come when a President signs an 
immigration bill that secures our borders, respect our laws, and treats 
people with dignity.
    And now I want to discuss trade with you. It's a sensitive subject 
in America, and it's an important subject. As business leaders, you 
understand that breaking down barriers to trade and investment creates 
opportunities for our workers, for American workers and employees and 
employers and consumers. We--trade adds to our prosperity, but as 
importantly, it adds to the prosperity of our trading partners. We want 
people who are interested in our goods and services to do well 
economically. We believe that the world benefits when prosperity is 
abundant throughout the world.
    Trade also serves a broader strategic purpose. When we enter into 
free trade agreements, we reinforce commitments to democracy and 
transparency and rule of law. By promoting a future of freedom and 
progress and hope, we create an alternative vision to those of the 
terrorists and extremists who prey on societies trapped in poverty and 
despair. In other words, trade helps democracies flourish; it helps 
enhance prosperity. And that helps us in our national security concerns.
    My administration has made expanding trade a high priority. When I 
took office, America had free trade agreements in force with just three 
nations. Isn't that interesting? Just three countries. Today, we have 
agreements in force with 14, and Congress recently approved another one 
with Peru. Three more agreements are on Congress's agenda this year: 
Colombia, Panama, and South Korea. All three are important, and the 
agreement with Colombia is especially urgent.
    For more than a year, my administration has worked with both parties 
in Congress to seek a path to bring this agreement up for approval. We 
continue to stand ready to negotiate a bipartisan way forward. But time 
is running out, and we must not allow delay to turn into inaction. The 
Colombia agreement is pivotal to America's national security and 
economic interests right now, and it is too important to be held up by 
politics. There needs to be a vote on Colombia this year.
    And that means that Members of the Congress must be ready to move 
forward with the agreement when they return from the Easter recess. 
Members of both parties should work with this administration to bring 
legislation to implement the Colombia agreement to the floor for 
approval. And they need to get the job done and get a bill to my desk.
    And I'll tell you why: Because this agreement with Colombia will 
advance our national security and economic interests in these ways. 
Colombia is one of our closest allies in the Western Hemisphere. Under 
the leadership of President Uribe, 
Colombia has been a strong and capable partner, a strong and effective 
partner in fighting drugs and crime and terror. Colombia has also 
strengthened its democracy, reformed its economy. It has spoken out 
against anti-Americanism. This Government has made hard choices that 
deserves the admiration and the gratitude of the United States.
    These actions have required courage, and they've come with costs. As 
we speak, Colombia is under assault from a terrorist network known as 
the FARC, which aims to overthrow Colombia's democracy and aims to 
impose a Marxist vision on the country.

[[Page 357]]

The FARC pursues this objective through bombing, hostage-taking, and 
assassination, much of it funded by drug trafficking. Since 2003, 
attacks by the FARC have killed or injured more than 1,500 civilians. 
Last summer, the FARC executed 11 Colombian lawmakers after holding them 
captive for 5 years. And the FARC continues to use jungle camps to hold 
hundreds of kidnaped victims, including three 
U.S. citizens.
    President Uribe has waged an 
aggressive campaign against FARC terrorists, who do not respect national 
sovereignty or borders. Earlier this month, Colombian forces killed one 
of FARC's most senior leaders, a man believed to be responsible for 
trafficking cocaine and murdering hundreds of people.
    And the response to all this action reveals the challenges that 
Colombia faces. The President of Venezuela 
praised the terrorist leader as a good revolutionary and ordered his 
troops to the Colombian border. This is the latest step in a disturbing 
pattern of provocative behavior by the regime in Caracas. It has also 
called for FARC terrorists to be recognized as a legitimate army, and 
senior regime officials have met with FARC leaders in Venezuela.
    As it tries to expand its influence in Latin America, the regime 
claims to promote social justice. In truth, its agenda amounts to little 
more than empty promises and a thirst for power. It has squandered its 
oil wealth in an effort to promote its hostile, anti-American vision. 
And it has left its own citizens to face food shortages, while it 
threatens its neighbors.
    The stakes are high in South America. As the recent standoff in the 
Andes shows, the region is facing an increasingly stark choice: to 
quietly accept the vision of the terrorists and the demagogues or to 
actively support democratic leaders like President Uribe. I've made my choice. I'm standing with courageous 
leadership that believes in freedom and peace. And I believe when the 
American people hear the facts, they will make their choice and stand 
with a person who loves liberty and freedom.
    And there is no clearer sign of our support than a free trade 
agreement. This agreement would help President Uribe show his people that democracy leads to tangible 
benefits. This agreement would help create new jobs in Colombia, which 
would make it harder to recruit people to violence and terrorism and 
drug trafficking. The agreement would signal to the region that 
America's commitment to free markets and free people is unshakable.
    And now it calls on Congress to decide whether this agreement will 
take effect. People across the hemisphere are watching. They are waiting 
to see what Congress will do.
    Some Members of Congress have raised concerns over the situation in 
Colombia. Again and again, President Uribe has responded decisively. He's responded to concerns 
about violence by demobilizing tens of thousands of paramilitary 
fighters. He's responded to concerns about attacks on trade unionists by 
stepping up funding for prosecutions, establishing an independent 
prosecutors unit, and creating a special program to protect labor 
activists. He's responded to concerns over labor and environmental 
standards by revising the free trade agreement to include some of the 
most rigorous protections of any agreement in history. As one Democratic 
House Member put it, ``It's impossible for someone to go to Colombia and 
not be impressed with the strides they have made.'' Ladies and 
gentlemen, if this isn't enough to earn America's support, then what is?
    If Congress were to reject the agreement with Colombia, we would 
validate antagonists in Latin America who would say that the America 
cannot be trusted to stand by its friends. We would cripple our 
influence in the region and make other nations less likely to cooperate 
with us in the future. We would betray one of our closest friends in our 
own backyard.

[[Page 358]]

    In the words of Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada, ``If the U.S. turns its back on its 
friends in Colombia, this will set back our cause far more than any 
Latin American dictator could hope to achieve.'' Congress needs to 
listen to those wise words as they consider this important bill. Members 
of both parties should come together. Members of both parties should 
demonstrate their support for freedom in our hemisphere. And members of 
both parties should prove the--approve the Colombian free trade 
agreement.
    These strategic benefits are not the only reason for Congress to 
approve our trade agreement with Colombia. The agreement will also bring 
economic gains for both countries. Today, virtually all exports from 
Colombia enter into the United States duty free, but U.S. exports to 
Colombia face tariffs up to 35 percent. Now think about that. Goods 
coming from Colombia to us enter our country virtually duty free, and 
yet goods going from the United States to Colombia are taxed.
    Now, doesn't it make sense to pass an agreement that says, the 
Colombians will treat us the way we treat them? If you're a farmer or 
interested in exporting construction equipment or aircraft and auto 
parts or medical and scientific equipment, your goods will now go into 
Colombia duty free, which means you're more likely to be able to sell 
your goods into Colombia. And if you're working for one of those 
companies, it means you're more likely to be able to keep your job.
    I can't understand a mentality that doesn't recognize that causing 
America to be treated equally is not in our interests. It is in our 
interests. Every day that Congress goes without approving this agreement 
is a day that our businesses, large and small, become less competitive. 
It's missed opportunity.
    This agreement is especially important during a difficult period for 
our economy. Listen, last year, exports accounted for more than 40 
percent of growth. Doesn't it make sense to open up markets, to continue 
to grow our economy with good exports? I think it does. And this is an 
opportunity for the United States Congress to send a clear message that 
they are concerned, like I'm concerned, about the state of our economy. 
They, like me, want to provide opportunities for our producers and our 
workers to be able to find new markets and expanded markets for U.S. 
goods and services.
    This agreement will also benefit Colombia. It will give Colombian 
exporters the certainty that comes with permanent access. This will help 
stimulate investment and economic growth and higher standards of living 
for families in Colombia. And it will make it clear to the Colombian 
people, we're partners in prosperity, and we're partners in peace.
    The time is coming when Members will get to vote yes or no. My 
administration is committed to working this agreement hard on the floor 
of the Congress. I firmly believe it is in our interests that this be 
passed. It's not in our political interests. We ought to just put 
politics aside and focus on what's best for the United States of 
America. And what is best for our country is to get this agreement 
approved soon.
    Congress also ought to approve the other two trade agreements on 
their agenda after they approve this one. Congress needs to approve the 
trade agreement with Panama, which will open up U.S. access to one of 
the fastest growing economies in Central America and support a key 
democratic partner. Congress also needs to approve the free trade 
agreement with South Korea, which has the potential to boost U.S. 
exports by more than $10 billion while strengthening a key ally.
    As Congress moves forward with these agreements, we will continue to 
press for an ambitious, successful Doha round at the WTO. We're prepared 
to lead to ensure Doha reaches a successful conclusion. We understand 
the role of the United States. We're not going to shirk our duty to 
lead.

[[Page 359]]

But we're not going to make unilateral concessions either. We want 
negotiations to come from--as a result of meaningful contributions by 
all folks. That's how you reach a successful round.
    And so we challenged our trading partners to help forge a deal that 
opens up global trade flows and creates new opportunities for developed 
and developing nations alike. Our view is, the time for debating Doha is 
over. Now is the time for leaders to make tough choices that will allow 
these negotiations to advance.
    Look, I know a lot of folks are worried about trade. There's 
neighbors worrying about neighbors losing jobs. People say, ``Well, 
trade causes us to lose jobs.'' And I fully understand that. Sometimes 
trade causes people to lose jobs. Sometimes the fact that technology 
hasn't advanced as rapidly or the productivity of workers isn't as good 
as it should be has caused people to lose jobs.
    But nevertheless, there is that concern. And so my question to the 
American people is, what's the best way to respond? One option is to 
stop trade, erect barriers, try to wall ourselves off from the world. 
Those costs of isolationist policies and protectionist policies would 
far exceed any possible benefit. Closing off our markets would drive up 
prices for American families. Making it harder for people to sell goods 
in our country would deny families choices that they've been used to. We 
want our consumers to have choices when they walk into markets. The more 
choices available, the better it is for a consumer. The more competition 
it is for a product, the less likely it is price will rise.
    The other nations would retaliate, by the way, if they saw the 
United States throwing up barriers, and that would push jobs overseas 
faster. It could hurt millions of Americans who go to work each morning, 
who work for companies that rely upon exports or companies that rely 
upon foreign capital as their base of operations.
    You know, some have called for a timeout from trade. I guess that's 
probably popular with the focus group. You know, they toss out the word 
``timeout'' from trade. It's got this kind of catchy little title to it. 
In the 21st century, a timeout from trade would be a timeout from 
growth, a timeout from jobs, and a timeout from good results. And 
retreating from the opportunities of the global economy would be a 
reckless mistake that our country cannot afford.
    And there's a better answer. And one of them shows faith in the 
American workers instead of trying to stand against the growth of global 
trade, instead of granting other people access to markets that we 
ourselves could have. Instead of squandering an opportunity, why don't 
we help educate people? Why don't we provide educational opportunities 
so workers will have the skills necessary to fill the high-paying jobs 
of the 21st century?
    One reason I mentioned No Child Left Behind is, it's got to--this 
program has got to start early, and it is. We're setting high standards 
and measuring and correcting problems early, before it's too late. But 
there's more we can do. We provided more than a billion dollars for new 
initiatives to educate and prepare workers for the jobs of the 21st 
century. Yesterday Secretary Chao announced 
more than $100 million in new community-based job training grants. In 
other words, we're focusing money to help people get the skills 
necessary to fill the jobs that are available in America. And when you 
get education, you're a more productive worker, which means you're going 
to get paid more money. That's what that means.
    These grants support community college programs--I'm a big supporter 
of community colleges--that provide training for jobs in high-growth 
fields. And that's our strategy. Now, the word you'll hear attached to 
that is trade adjustment assistance. That's another program aimed at 
helping people get the skills necessary to find work. We

[[Page 360]]

support it. We support reforming and reauthorizing the vital program as 
a key component of trade policy. And I look forward to working with 
Congress to sign a good bill that I can sign into law.
    These agreements that I've talked about deserve support from both 
sides of the aisle. And today I want to make a direct appeal to the 
members of the Democratic Party. From Franklin Roosevelt to John F. 
Kennedy to Bill Clinton, Democrats have a 
long history of supporting trade. Opening markets has been a history and 
a cornerstone of Democratic policy. As President Clinton said when he 
signed legislation to implement NAFTA 14 years ago, ``We're on the verge 
of a global economic expansion that is sparked by the fact that the 
United States, at this critical moment, decided we would compete and not 
retreat.'' I fully support those strong words, those confident words, 
those optimistic words about America's ability to compete in the world. 
Thanks in part to the market-opening set in motion by the President, 
trade between the United States, Mexico, and Canada has more than 
tripled since 1993.
    I mean, I know there's a lot of criticism of NAFTA, but I will tell 
you this: I grew up in Texas; I remember what the border was like. And I 
would ask people to go down to that border today and see the benefits, 
the mutual benefits of what trade has meant for people who, on both 
sides of the border, for years grew up in abject poverty. We may have 
some south Texans here today, and if you're old enough, you know exactly 
what I'm talking about.
    The transformation has been remarkable because both sides have 
benefited. Both sides have realized the blessings of trade, as has 
Canada. All three of our economies, by the way, since that agreement was 
signed, have grown by more than 50 percent. More than 25 million new 
jobs have been created in the United States. The unemployment rate is 
lower than in previous decades. Workers, farmers, entrepreneurs have 
seen real improvements in their daily lives, including many Hispanic-
owned businesses on both sides of the border.
    Listen, NAFTA has worked. People shouldn't back away from NAFTA. 
It's been a positive development for a lot of people. And if you're 
worried about people coming to our country to find jobs, there's no 
better way to help somebody stay home than for there to be prosperity in 
their neighborhood. I'm convinced most people don't want to try to sneak 
into America to work. I'm convinced most people would rather have a job 
close to their--close to where they live. And trade helps increase 
prosperity. It's mutually beneficial for Canada, the United States, and 
America--I mean, and Mexico.
    Now, look, I understand supporting free trade agreements is not 
politically easy. There are a lot of special interest groups that are 
willing to spend a lot of money to make somebody's life miserable when 
it comes to supporting free trade agreements. But I believe leadership 
requires people rising above this empty, hollow political rhetoric. If 
you're committed to multilateral diplomacy, you cannot support 
unilateral withdrawal from trade agreements. If you're worried--
[applause]--if you are worried about America's image in the world, it 
makes no sense to disappoint the nations that are counting on us most. 
If you care about lifting developing nations out of poverty, you cannot 
deny them access to the world's greatest engine of economic growth. If 
you're truly optimistic about our country's future, there's no reason to 
wall our Nation off from the opportunities of the world.
    I appreciate your efforts in these matters. I feel strongly that 
trade is in our national interests. I know it's in your personal 
interests if you're businesspeople. Of course, as you prosper, people 
are more likely to find work. After all, 70 percent of the new jobs in 
America are created by small-business owners just like those present 
here.
    I believe Congress will do the right thing. When it's all said and 
done, they'll

[[Page 361]]

take a hard look at the facts. They will take a look at the consequences 
of rejecting a trade agreement with our close ally. They'll take a good 
look at the consequences of sending the wrong message to the false 
populists of the region. They'll take a simple, logical look at how this 
can benefit our farmers and small-business owners and employers.
    Thanks for helping us work the issue. Thanks for giving me a chance 
to come and speak to you. May God bless you, and may God bless our 
country.

Note: The President spoke at 10:41 a.m. at the Ronald Reagan Building 
and International Trade Center. In his remarks, he referred to David C. 
Lizarraga, chair, Augustine Martinez, interim president and chief 
executive officer, and Michael L. Barrera, former president and chief 
executive officer, U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; Hector V. Barreto, 
former Administrator, Small Business Administration; Marc Gonsalves, 
Thomas Howes, and Keith Stansell, hostages held by the Revolutionary 
Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC); and President Hugo Chavez Frias of 
Venezuela.