    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2008, Book I)]
    [March 3, 2008]
    [Pages 307-309]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the National Association of Attorneys General
    March 3, 2008

        General Wasden, thank you, sir. And
    General Lynch, thank you for having the
    Attorney General and me here to visit
    with the Nation's attorney generals. I thank you very much for serving
    the country. I'm honored that you've stepped forward to say, you know,
    my family--I'm going to put my family in such a way that we're going to
    serve together. And I hope you have found the experience to be as
    enriching as I've found it--my experience in public life to be.
        I also know that you're dealing with a wide variety of issues. I was
    the Governor of Texas. I see my--the attorney general of Texas here. It's been--it was a great joy to work with Greg
    when I was the Governor. We have a solemn responsibility together, and
    that's to protect the country. You do it in a variety of ways. And we've
    got a responsibility here. As a matter of fact, there's no greater
    responsibility at the Federal Government than to protect the American
    people, which means that we must make sure our professionals have the
    tools they need to do the jobs we've asked them to do.
        Now, there's a serious debate here, and some of the attorney
    generals have written a letter, both Democrats and Republicans, urging
    that the debate be solved in such a way that the professionals can do
    the job. And I thank you for wading in. There's a lot of legal
    complexities on the FISA renewal debate, but the real issue comes down
    to this: To defend the country, we need to be able to monitor
    communications of terrorists quickly and be able to do it effectively.
        And we can't do it without the cooperation of private companies.
    Now, unfortunately, some of the private companies have

    [[Page 308]]

    been sued for billions of dollars because they are believed to have
    helped defend America after the attacks on 9/11. Now the question is,
    should these lawsuits be allowed to proceed, or should any company that
    may have helped save American lives be thanked for performing a
    patriotic service? Should those who stepped forward to say we're going
    to help defend America have to go to the courthouse to defend
    themselves, or should the Congress and the President say, ``Thank you
    for doing your patriotic duty''? I believe we ought to say, ``Thank
    you.''
        I'm really appreciative of the fact that 21 State attorney generals,
    7 Democrats and 14 Republicans, wrote a letter stating that assistance
    from private companies, as they put it, ``is utterly essential'' and
    urges the Senate--at the time--to approve FISA reform that protects the
    companies from lawsuits. I think that represents what most people--how
    most people think here in the country.
        The Senate heard you and heard the voices of other people and passed
    a really good FISA reform bill by a strong bipartisan majority, 68 to
    29. The answer to the question about whether we ought to thank or sue is
    also clear to the majority in the House of Representatives. If this
    bill, the Senate bill, were allowed--were given a vote on the floor of
    the House of Representatives, it would pass. There's enough votes
    available to pass a good Senate bill that would give our professionals
    the tools they need to protect the American people from further attack.
        Unfortunately, a minority in the House has been holding the bill up.
    Now, this weekend there was some encouraging news. The chairman of the
    House Intelligence Committee, Silvestre Reyes, said that he was open to passing a bill with
    protections for our private sector partners, including those companies
    who are currently being sued for allegedly helping us after 9/11. I
    appreciate the chairman's comments, and I urge the full House to pass
    this legislation as soon as possible.
        I feel strongly about this issue, not only because I know we need to
    have the private carriers available to provide information, but to put
    it bluntly, if the enemy is calling in to somebody in the United States,
    we need to know who they're talking to and why they're calling and what
    they intend to do.
        These lawsuits are really unfair if you think about it. If any of
    the companies believed to have helped us,I'm just going to tell you:
    They were told it was legal by the Government, and they were told it was
    necessary by the Government. And here they are getting sued. It would be
    dangerous--the reason--the danger in all this is that because the
    private companies are fearful of lawsuits or being besieged by lawsuits,
    they would be less willing to help in the future.
        If your Government has said this is legal and we want your help and
    then all of a sudden they get sued for billions of dollars, you can
    imagine how hesitant they'll be with future requests. And yet the threat
    is ongoing. And that's why we said, failure by the House to act on the
    Senate bill would create an intelligence gap that is unacceptable.
        So I appreciate your interest in the subject. Thank you for giving
    me and the General a chance to come by, and God bless you. Thank you.

    Note: The President spoke at 1:22 p.m. in Room 350 of the Dwight D.
    Eisenhower Executive Office Building. In his remarks, he referred to
    State Attorneys General Lawrence Wasden of Idaho, Patrick C. Lynch of
    Rhode Island, and Greg Abbott of Texas.

    [[Page 309]]