    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2008, Book I)]
    [February 14, 2008]
    [Pages 192-197]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Interview With Matt Frei of BBC World News America
    February 14, 2008

    President's Upcoming Visit to Africa

        Mr. Frei. Mr. President, thanks for joining us. You're famous for
    saying that you don't believe in opinion polls.
        The President. Yes.
        Mr. Frei. Do you have any idea how you rate in the countries that
    you're going to be visiting in Africa?
        The President. No, sir, I don't.
        Mr. Frei. Well, I've got news for you, and it's good news. You rate
    pretty well, sort of in the average eighties. Is that one of the reasons
    why you're going there? This is one part of the world where you're still
    very popular.
        The President. I go where needed. And no, I'm going there because
    I've got a firm,heartfelt commitment to the continent of Africa and had
    ever since I became President. It's in our interests, national
    interests, that we help people who are suffering from disease and hunger
    and hopelessness. The only way a radical can recruit is to find somebody
    that's hopeless. I mean, their vision is, like, really dark and dim.
        Plus, I believe to whom much is given, much is required. And America
    has been given a lot, and it's required of us to help those who suffer.
    So mine is a mercy--a mission of mercy and a mission of the cold realism
    of the world in which we live--based upon the realism in the world in
    which we live.

    [[Page 193]]

    President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

        Mr. Frei. Your administration has given $15 billion to treat AIDS in
    Africa, which is an unprecedented amount of money, and you want to
    double that amount yet again. This is a huge commitment, and yet the
    administration and you, personally, don't seem to be getting a lot of
    credit for it.
        The President. Yes. You know, this is kind of tied to your first
    question about polls. Polls are nothing more than just, like, a poof of
    air. What matters is results. And ultimately, people will be able to
    make an objective judgment of a President and his administration and, in
    this case, a country's commitment. And so all I care, really, about is
    the results of the programs.
        I hope by now people have learned that I'm not one of these guys
    that really gives a darn about elite opinion. What I really care about
    is, are we saving lives? And in this case, we are. As I mentioned in my
    speech that you kindly listened to, when I first went to sub-Sahara
    Africa, 50,000 people were receiving antiretrovirals; today, 1.3
    million. And that's a lot in a very quick period of time. But there's
    still so much more suffering, and that's why I've called for a doubling
    of aid.
        The good news is, it's not just America. As I mentioned in my
    speech, the G-8 nations also are supporting this very important
    initiative. And, you know, it's a--it's just--in other words, this isn't
    a paternalistic effort, this is an effort of mercy.
        Mr. Frei. But it has made a huge difference, hasn't it? So why not
    take some credit for it?
        The President. Because it's just not my nature. I really--you just
    got to understand about me: I'm more interested in seeing results and
    sharing the credit with the American people. I mean, this is not a
    George Bush effort. I just happen to be the leader of a nation that's
    willing to fund this kind of money. And so I praised Congress in my
    speech; I praised the American people in my speech. After all, they're
    the ones who are funding the effort.

    Darfur

        Mr. Frei. You were very tough in your speech about Darfur, and yet
    again, you called what's happening there genocide.
        The President. Yes.
        Mr. Frei. Is enough being done by your administration to stop that?
        The President. I think we are, yes. You know, I had to make a
    seminal decision, and that is whether or not I would commit troops
    into--U.S. troops into Darfur. And I was pretty well backed off of it by
    a lot of folks here in America that care deeply about the issue. And so
    once you make that decision, then you have to rely upon an international
    organization like the United Nations to provide the oomph, the necessary
    manpower.
        And in my speech today, I did call it genocide again. I think we're
    the only nation that has done so. Secondly, I did remind people that
    we're sanctioning leaders, that we have targeted Sudanese companies and
    individuals, including a rebel leader who have yet to be constructive in
    the peace process. We're beginning to get a sense that these sanctions
    are affecting behavior. We're trying to ask others, by the way, to do
    the same thing, some of whom are reluctant, some who aren't. And then,
    finally, I pledged that we'll help move troops in. And as I also said--
    you might remind your listeners--that I'm frustrated by the pace.

    U.S. Role in Darfur

        Mr. Frei. I'll get onto that in a minute, but, I mean, ``genocide''
    is such a loaded--it's such an important word. And you have committed
    troops, American troops, around the world in other cases, Iraq, most
    famously, Afghanistan. Why not in this case?
        The President. Well, that's a good question. I mean, we're
    committing equipment, training, help, movement. I think a lot of the
    folks were concerned about America

    [[Page 194]]

    into another Muslim country. Some of the relief groups here just didn't
    think the strategy would be as effective as it was. I mean, I actually,
    believe it or not, listen to people's opinions and chose to make this
    decision. It's a decision that I'm now living with, and it's a decision
    that requires us to continue to rally the conscience of the world and
    get people to focus on the issue.
        You know, you're right. I mean, we sent marines into Liberia, for
    example, to help stabilize the country there. And Liberia's on my
    itinerary, where I'll meet with the first woman elected
    President in Africa's history. But I
    just made the decision I made.

    Steven Spielberg/2008 Beijing Olympics/
    China's Role in Darfur

        Mr. Frei. Yesterday Steven Spielberg, the Hollywood director, pulled
    out of the Beijing Olympics over Darfur. He said the Chinese aren't
    doing enough to stop the killing in Darfur.
        The President. Yes.
        Mr. Frei. Do you applaud his move?
        The President. That's up to him. I'm going to the Olympics. I view
    the Olympics as a sporting event. On the other hand, I have a little
    different platform than Steven Spielberg, so I get to talk to President
    Hu Jintao. And I do remind him that he can do more
    to relieve the suffering in Darfur.
        There's a lot of issues that I suspect people are going to opine
    about during the Olympics. I mean, you got the Dalai Lama crowd; you've got global warming folks; you've
    got Darfur. And I just--I am not going to go and use the Olympics as an
    opportunity to express my opinions to the Chinese people in a public way
    because I do it all the time with the President. I
    mean, so people are going to be able to choose--pick and choose how they
    view the Olympics.

    U.S. Foreign Policy/War on Terror

        Mr. Frei. The Chinese Government has been saying, in part in
    response to this, that America is trapped in cold war thinking.
        The President. Well, I think that's just a brush-back pitch, as we
    say in baseball. It's a--America is trapped in this notion that we care
    about human life; we respect human dignity--and that's not a trap;
    that's a belief--and that many of us in this country recognize that the
    human condition matters to our own national security.
        See, I happen to believe we're in an ideological struggle. And those
    who murder the innocent to achieve political objectives are evil people,
    but they have an ideology. And the only way you can recruit for that
    ideology is to find hopeless folks.
        I mean, who wants to join an ideology that say: women don't have
    rights; you can't express yourself freely; religious beliefs are--the
    only religious belief you can hold is the one we tell you. And, oh, by
    the way, it's great; you can be a suicider. Hopeless people are the ones
    who get attracted by that point of view. And therefore, it's in the
    world's interest, from a national security perspective, to deal with
    hopelessness.
        And it happens to be in our moral interest. I repeat to you: I
    believe to whom much is given, much is required. It happens to be a
    religious notion, but it should be a universal notion as well. And I
    believe America's soul is enriched, our spirit is enhanced when we help
    people who suffer.

    Rwanda/Darfur

        Mr. Frei. I mentioned the genocide thing also because your
    predecessor, President Clinton, said that the one thing--one of the key
    things that keeps him up at night is that he didn't do enough over
    Rwanda to stop the killing there. Is it possible that Darfur might
    become your Rwanda?
        The President. I don't think so. I hope--I certainly hope not. I
    mean, Rwanda was, I think, 900,000 people in a very quick

    [[Page 195]]

    period of time of just wholesale slaughter. And I appreciate President
    Clinton's compassion and concern. And I'm
    comfortable with making a decision that I think is the best decision and
    comfortable with the notion that once that decision is made, we're
    keeping the world's focus as best as we can on that, amongst other
    issues.

    Zimbabwe/South Africa

        Mr. Frei. You also had some very strong language today about
    Zimbabwe----
        The President. Yes, I did.
        Mr. Frei. ----which is an issue that certain--Britain and the United
    States care deeply about. Again, this has been going on for years. What
    can be done to stop the crisis in Zimbabwe?
        The President. Yes, I--first is call the--is to speak to the
    conscience of the world and remind people the facts. I mean, Zimbabwe
    was the breadbasket of southern Africa, and today, it's in line for food
    aid. Zimbabwe was a--is now a place where people are repressed because
    of their beliefs. And you're right; there is not a lot of outcry. And
    it's a frustrating--look, not everything is perfect in this world, and
    it just requires constant focus.
        And one way to do it is for the American President to speak out or
    the British Prime Minister to speak out. And,
    as you know, I mentioned South Africa. I have great respect for the
    people of South Africa. I just happen to believe their Government can do
    more to enhance a free society in their region. Yes, it's just--there's
    a lot of frustrations in this world, and there's a lot of hope in this
    world as well.

    President's Legacy

        Mr. Frei. You're nearing the end of your second term and, I guess,
    one can call is legacy time. Whatever you do and say about Africa,
    there's only one country, really, that the wider world will associate
    with you, and that equation is, Bush equals Iraq.
        The President. Yes.
        Mr. Frei. Are you happy about that?
        The President. Well, I mean, that's what the current elite would
    like everybody to think about, and that's fine. I think history will
    have a--when history marches on, there will be a little more objective
    look about the totality of this administration.
        Of course, our change in the way we did aid in Africa is substantial
    and different, and lives will have been saved. Dealing with liberating
    25 million in Afghanistan is part of what I hope people think of when
    they look at my Presidency. Being the first President to propose a two-
    state solution on Israel and Palestine--I mean, there's a lot of other
    issues. And I'm happy with Iraq. The right--the decision to move Saddam
    Hussein was right, and this democracy is now taking root. And I'm
    confident that if America does not become isolationist and allow the
    terrorists to take back over, Iraq will succeed.

    U.S. Troop Levels in Iraq

        Mr. Frei. Are you--do you regret, rather, I should say, that you
    didn't listen to your--some of your commanders earlier to send more
    troops to Iraq to achieve the kind of results that we're seeing now to
    some extent?
        The President. You know, my commanders didn't tell me that early. My
    commanders said, we got the right level of troops. You know, wars--it's
    easy to second--the tactical decisions of war, and I fully understand
    and expect that to happen. All I can do is base decisions on the
    considered judgment of the experts. And I did. And I take full
    responsibility for every military decision that's been made in Iraq.
        But I'm pleased with what's happening now. And the world is
    beginning to recognize that the decision to send more troops--was a
    pretty tough decision at the time--is providing enough security for the
    politics to take place. And this morning--you're the first reporter I've
    been able to describe these conversations to, but I did speak to the
    Prime Minister, the Speaker, and two Deputy
    Speakers to congratulate

    [[Page 196]]

    them on a series of substantial legislative achievements that are
    beginning to say to the world and, more importantly, the Iraqi people,
    reconciliation is happening, and the legislative body is beginning to
    function, which is good news.

    U.S. Intelligence Reform Legislation and Interrogation Techniques

        Mr. Frei. The Senate yesterday passed a bill outlawing
    waterboarding. You, I believe, have said that you will veto that bill.
    Does that not send the wrong signal to the rest of the world?
        The President. No, look, that's not the reason I'm vetoing the bill.
    The reason I'm vetoing the bill--first of all, we have said that
    whatever we do is for legal--will be legal. Secondly, they are imposing
    a set of standards on our intelligence communities, in terms of
    interrogating prisoners, that our people will think will be ineffective.
        And to the critics, I ask them this: When we, within the law,
    interrogate and get information that protects ourselves and possibly
    others and other nations--to prevent attacks--which attack would they
    had hoped that we wouldn't have prevented? And so the United States will
    act within the law, and we'll make sure our professionals have the tools
    necessary to do their job within the law.
        Now, I recognize some say that these terrorists really aren't that
    big a threat to the United States anymore. I fully disagree. And I think
    the President must give these professionals, within the law, the
    necessary tools to protect us. So we're having a debate not only on how
    you interrogate people; we're having a debate in America on whether or
    not we ought to be listening to terrorists making phone calls in the
    United States. And the answer is, darn right we ought to be.

    War on Terror/Guantanamo Bay Detainees

        Mr. Frei. But given Guantanamo Bay, given also Abu Ghraib, given
    renditions, does this not send the wrong signal to the world?
        The President. It should send the signal that America is going to
    respect law but is going to take actions necessary to protect ourselves
    and find information that may protect others. Unless, of course, people
    say: ``Well, there's no threat. They're just making up the threat. These
    people aren't problematic.'' But I don't see how you can say that in
    Great Britain, after people came and blew up bombs in subways. I suspect
    the families of those victims understand the nature of killers.
        And so what people got to understand is, we'll make decisions based
    upon law. We're a nation of law. Take Guantanamo, look, I'd like it to
    be empty. On the other hand, there's some people there that need to be
    tried. And there will be a trial, and they'll have their day in court,
    unlike what they did to other people.
        No, there's great concern about--and I can understand this--that
    these people be given rights, but they're not willing to grant the same
    rights to others. They'll murder, but you got to understand, they're
    getting rights. And I'm comfortable with the decisions we've made, and
    I'm comfortable with recognizing this is still a dangerous world.

    U.S. Foreign Policy

        Mr. Frei. Can you honestly say, Mr. President, that today, America
    still occupies the moral high ground?
        The President. Absolutely. Absolutely. We believe in human rights
    and human dignity. We believe in the human condition. We believe in
    freedom. And we're willing to take the lead; we're willing to ask
    nations to do hard things; we're willing to accept responsibilities. And
    yes, no question in my mind, this is a nation that's a force for good.
    And history will judge the decisions made during this period of time as
    necessary decisions. And I firmly believe that we are laying the
    foundation for peace.
        People have written off the Middle East--it's impossible to have--
    change the

    [[Page 197]]

    conditions there; let's just ignore it, or let's promote stability,
    which was part of the foreign policy of the past. I chose a different
    course. Stability didn't work. Stability created the conditions that
    were ripe for these terrorists to emerge and recruit. I happen to
    believe free societies provide hope. And I would hope that people in
    Europe, for example, understand that freedom has led to peace and ought
    to be supporting the freedom movements and not shy away from the
    responsibility of the comfortable to help those who long for freedom.
        And it's hard work. It's really hard work, and it doesn't happen
    instantly. You know, we live in a world--like, in all due respect to 24-
    hour news, we live in a world where everything is, like, instant. But
    the work we're doing is--it takes patience, but most importantly, it
    takes faith in the universality of freedom that exists in every heart.
        And so yes, I'm not only happy to defend decisions, I'm confident
    that they will lead to a better tomorrow.
        Mr. Frei. Mr. President, I gather we've run out of time. Thanks for
    doing this.
        The President. Thank you, sir. You bet.
        Mr. Frei. Thank you.

    Note: The interview was taped at 11:12 a.m. in the Library at the White
    House for later broadcast. In his remarks, the President referred to
    President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia; Prime Minister Gordon Brown
    of the United Kingdom; Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki of Iraq; and
    Speaker Mahmud al-Mashhadani, First Deputy Speaker Khalid al-Attiya, and
    Second Deputy Speaker Arif Tayfur of the Iraqi House of Representatives.
    He also referred to H.R. 2082. The transcript was released by the Office
    of the Press Secretary on February 15.