    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2007, Book II)]
    [September 24, 2007]
    [Pages 1227-1229]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the Young Presidents' Organization
    September 24, 2007

        Thank you all. Please be seated. I've spoken to a lot of people in
    this room, but rarely have I spoken to a group of people who I can
    address, Mr. President, or Madam President. [Laughter] I thank you for
    joining us. I appreciate Jim Nussle joining
    us as well.
        I look forward to having--giving you a few remarks on the budget. As
    business leaders, you know it's important to set priorities and make
    decisions in a timely way. That's what you do on a daily basis. If you
    were running a company whose lease was up for renewal in a few months,
    you'd ask the landlord to start negotiating on prices and terms. You
    would anticipate the cancellation of the--or the renegotiation of the
    lease. You would ask for time to think about the best way forward, and
    you wouldn't be happy if the landlord waited until the night before your
    time was up and then dropped on your desk a 500-page lease that he
    expected you to sign. In the business world, that's called alienating
    your customers. [Laughter] In Washington, that's called the
    appropriations process. [Laughter]
        The fiscal year ends in less than a week. Yet Congress has not sent
    a single appropriations bill to my desk. Not one. Instead, the
    congressional leaders may end up lumping all 12 outstanding
    appropriations bills into one massive, trillion-dollar piece of
    legislation later this year. This would make it easier for Members to
    sneak in all kinds of special projects, put in wasteful spending or
    porkbarrel that they are not willing to debate in the open.
        If they think that by waiting until just before they leave for the
    year to send me a bill that is way over budget and thicker than a
    phonebook, if they think that's going to force me to sign it, it's not.
    This would be bad for our country, it would be harmful for our economy,
    and it would be unfair for the taxpayers.
        This is an important time for our economy. For nearly 6 years, we've
    enjoyed uninterrupted economic growth. Since August 2003, the economy
    has added more than 8.2 million jobs. Productivity is growing, and
    that's translating into larger paychecks for American workers.
    Unemployment is low, inflation is low, and opportunity abounds. The
    entrepreneurial spirit is strong.
        You know, this economic vitality just didn't happen--in other words,
    it's--I think

    [[Page 1228]]

    it's the result of hard work and people dreaming big dreams and working
    hard to fulfill them. I also believe it's the result of progrowth
    economic policies. And the job is--in Washington is to keep the
    environment sound for investment and for growth.
        And so with that in mind, last February, I submitted a budget to
    Congress that fully funds our priorities, yet holds the growth of
    nonsecurity discretionary spending to less than inflation, it puts us on
    the path to budget surplus by 2012, and it does all this without raising
    taxes. In other words, we can meet priorities, and we can do so without
    raising taxes. I think raising taxes would be bad for the economy and
    bad for the working people.
        Unfortunately, the Democratic majority in Congress has chosen a
    different path. The plan they have put forward includes an increase in
    discretionary spending that is nearly $22 billion more than my budget
    request. Some in Congress will tell you that $22 billion is not a lot of
    money. As business leaders, you know better. As a matter of fact, $22
    billion is larger than the annual revenues of most Fortune 500
    companies. And the $22 billion is only for the first year. With every
    passing year, the number gets bigger and bigger, and so over the next 5
    years, the increase in Federal spending would add up to $205 billion.
    And the only way to pay for such a large spending increase is to raise
    taxes on the American people.
        So it's no surprise that the same Members of Congress who are
    planning the big increase in Federal spending are also planning the
    largest tax increase in American history. At a time when families are
    working hard to pay their mortgages or pay for their children going to
    college, now is not the time to be taking money out of their pocket.
        The Founders understood that there would be times when the President
    and the Congress would have different views about spending and taxes,
    and so they gave the executive and legislative branches different
    powers. Congress has the power of the purse, the authority to pass tax
    bills and set spending levels. The President has the authority to reject
    unwise or excessive taxes and spending. And unless Congress has a two-
    third majority, it must come to an agreement with the President if it
    wants to get a bill enacted.
        Every year, Congress deals with separate bills that fund the day-to-
    day activities of our Government, everything from defense to homeland
    security to education and transportation. These 12 spending bills are
    the normal process by which Congress sets it priorities when they spend
    your money.
        Now we are days away from the end of the year--end of the fiscal
    year. And as I told you, Congress hadn't finished one of these bills.
    They got the requirement to do 12; they hadn't done 1. If Congress
    doesn't get its work done in a week, the Government is not going to have
    the funding to continue important services. I don't believe the American
    people should be denied those services because Congress can't get its
    work done.
        Congress needs to pass these annual spending bills. And if they need
    more time, I urge them to pass a clean continuing resolution. Under a
    clean continuing resolution, the Government would continue to operate at
    current funding levels while the Congress works on the annual
    appropriations bills. The principle should be that there would be no new
    spending, no new policies, no new projects unless the President and
    Congress agree in advance on a specific item.
        The continuing resolution is not a new idea. This isn't the first
    time it's--would have happened. The last Congress didn't pass all its
    appropriations bills on time. And with the help of a continuing
    resolution, Congress kept the Government running while finishing the
    work. An earlier Republican Congress did the same thing during

    [[Page 1229]]

    President Clinton's second term after a disruptive Government shutdown
    that no Congress has allowed since.
        When the 110th Congress took office earlier this week, the leaders
    promised to make the legislative process more transparent and to prove
    they could be responsible with the people's money. They said, ``Give us
    a chance to be responsible.'' Well, now is the time to honor those
    pledges. By passing a clean continuing resolution, Congress would give
    itself extra time to complete the 12 annual spending bills, and do them
    1 at a time, in a fiscally responsible way.
        I believe we can work together to keep your taxes low, to keep the
    economy growing, and to balance a Federal budget. I appreciate you
    giving me a chance to come and visit with you. Thank you.

    Note: The President spoke at 9:52 a.m. in Room 350 of the Dwight D.
    Eisenhower Executive Office Building. In his remarks, he referred to
    Office of Management and Budget Director James A. Nussle.