[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2007, Book I)]
[May 10, 2007]
[Pages 563-568]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Republican National Committee Gala
May 10, 2007

    The President. Thank you all. Thanks for coming. Please be seated, 
unless, of course, you don't have a chair. [Laughter] I'm glad you're 
here. And I'm glad I'm here with you, and I thank you. Thanks for 
coming; thanks for supporting the Republican Party. Here's our mission: 
Our mission is to keep the White House in 2008 and retake the Senate and 
the House. And you're helping, and you're helping a lot, and I really 
appreciate it.
    I appreciate my friend, Senator Mel Martinez, for being the general chairman of the Republican 
National Committee. You know, I believe that he is the first RNC 
chairman to speak English as a second language. [Laughter] Some people 
think I'm the first President who can make the same claim. [Laughter]
    But I'm proud to be with Mel and Michael Duncan and 
Elliott Broidy and all the good folks who are 
helping make sure that we're ready to run a vibrant and active campaign 
in 2008.
    I wish Laura were here. No, I know it; I 
know. I'm proud of her. She is a gracious, lovely person. And I am a 
lucky man to have had her by my side during this fantastic experience of 
being your President. She sends her love, and she sends her best. I want 
to--yes, I love her too. Yes, she's good. [Laughter]
    Audience member. I love you too.
    The President. Thank you. Well, it's one of these kind of 
interactive crowds. [Laughter]
    I've learned something about how you win campaigns. I've been 
through a few, myself. I have found that if you stand for something, the 
people will believe in you. If you stand on principles and enunciate 
that which you believe, the people will follow. And so as we head into 
campaign season next year, it's very important for the Republican Party 
to enunciate that which we believe, to stand for something, not be one 
of these parties that takes a focus group to tell us what to believe but 
to tell people what we believe and what those beliefs are, beliefs 
etched in our soul.
    I believe that everybody has the right to be free. I believe freedom 
is universal. I believe this country needs a strong national defense. I 
believe that the best way to encourage economic vitality so that people 
can realize the American Dream is through less government and more 
entrepreneurship. I believe that the government ought to trust in the 
judgment of ordinary citizens. I believe that technologies can help 
transform the world in a better way. And I believe when we find somebody 
who hurts, we ought to encourage faith-based and community groups to 
surround them with love. That's what I believe.
    These are difficult times for the United States. These are troubling 
times because we are a nation at war. I wish I could report that was not 
the case, but it is the case. And the most solemn obligation of 
government is to protect the American people from harm. Our most solemn 
duty is to use all our powers to protect you from further attack.
    I must tell you that my attitude toward the world changed 
dramatically on September the 11th, 2001. It was a day that affected our 
Nation deeply, and it affected me as President. And I vowed on that day 
and the days following that attack that I wouldn't tire, I wouldn't 
weary, that I would use all my capacities to rally the American people 
and the assets of this country to protect you.
    The enemy we face is fearless. They're mean. They know new--they 
know no boundaries of civilization as we know it, see. They kill to 
impose their will. It's hard for Americans to believe that we face such

[[Page 564]]

evil people, but we do. And the fundamental question facing this country 
is that we--will we have the will to face the threats of the 21st 
century?
    I have put forth a strategy that does protect America. In the short 
term, we will pursue the enemy wherever we find them. It is best to 
defeat the enemy overseas so we don't have to face them here in America.
    And so the war on terror is being fought on many fronts: in 
Afghanistan, in Southeast Asia, the Horn of Africa, and of course, the 
Middle East. In the long term, the best way to defeat an enemy that 
believes in a hateful ideology is to support the spread of an ideology 
that's hopeful, an ideology that lifts people's lives, an ideology that 
can defeat those who try to prey on innocent young people and convince 
them to murder. And that ideology is the ideology of liberty.
    We're implementing this strategy, and of course, the debate now 
centers on Iraq. And it's a tough fight. But I believe it's a necessary 
fight to protect the American people. There's been some progress. If you 
think about how far Iraq has come in a relatively short period of time, 
it's historic. The people there in that country have gone from life 
under a brutal tyrant who was an enemy of the United States to a society 
where 12 million Iraqis voted for one of the most modern constitutions 
in the history of the Middle East, a society where people were given a 
chance to express their will at the polls and elect a government.
    A thinking enemy, however, realized that progress was being made and 
used their brutal ways to try to foment sectarian violence. The enemy we 
face in Iraq is a multifaceted enemy. But the enemy that's causing the 
car bombs, the enemy that is causing the spectacular deaths of the 
innocent, is Al Qaida, the very same people that launched the attacks 
that killed nearly 3,000 citizens on our soul--soil.
    I was confronted with a choice. I had a decision to make. I told 
people that, you know, had they--had I been one of the people that 
answered a poll last fall, I would have said I disapprove of what was 
happening in Iraq. It was not satisfactory to me of what was taking 
place. The sectarian violence that was deep in that society was looking 
like it was going to make it impossible for this young democracy to 
survive. You can't have your capital city as a place where murderers 
stalk innocent people and expect for a young democracy to be able to get 
its roots and to grow.
    One choice was to pull back and hope that the violence wouldn't 
spill out across the country and out across the Middle East. The other 
choice that I made, in consultation with our military folks, was rather 
than pull back, to send reinforcements into the capital of that country, 
all aiming to give this young democracy an opportunity to do the 
reconciliation work necessary to have a country that can defend itself, 
govern itself, sustain itself, serves--serve as an example to other 
moderate people, and be an ally in the war on terror. And that's exactly 
what the policy is we're now following.
    I asked a new general, General David Petraeus, to implement the policy. Our goal is to help the Iraqis 
secure their population, especially in Baghdad. The operation is still 
in its early stages. The fourth of five groups of soldiers we're sending 
into Iraq have arrived; the fifth is on its way. In other words, the 
operational plan that David Petraeus explained to the United States 
Congress is still being implemented. We don't have the full complement 
of troops that I told the American people we would send into Baghdad.
    And yet there's some positive signs. One positive sign is that 
sectarian murders are down substantially, even before all our troops 
have arrived to help the Iraqi citizens. Sectarian murders are down. 
There's--people are gaining confidence, slowly but surely, in a 
government, because security is improving, and, therefore, there's more 
tips, more information being passed

[[Page 565]]

on to Iraqi forces and American forces so that we can help that society 
have the security necessary to do the hard work. We've had successful 
operations against extremists, whether they be Sunni or Shi'a. We're 
making progress.
    And now we're in a debate here in Washington, DC. And it's a debate, 
as you know, about whether or not to fund our troops. I think it's very 
important that Congress have an honest debate. And I don't question the 
patriotism of anyone who is expressing their views. But as I made clear 
to Members of Congress, a supplemental bill--a war spending bill that 
mandated withdrawals by an arbitrary date--or a bill that imposes 
restrictive conditions on our commanders, or a bill that would spend 
billions of dollars unrelated to the war was unacceptable, and that's 
why I vetoed the bill.
    I will continue to reach out to Democrats and Republicans to come up 
with a way to get this money to our troops as quickly as possible. We're 
not going to agree on every issue, but we don't want to put the men and 
women who wear our uniform in the midst of a Washington, DC, debate. 
These troops need the money, and Congress needs to get it to them.
    If I didn't think it was worthy, if I didn't think it was necessary, 
if I didn't realize and believe that it's important to defeat Al Qaida 
in Iraq, I wouldn't have our young men and women there in the first 
place. I believe this is a necessary action to protect our country.
    Much of the debate doesn't focus on the consequences of failure. 
There's a lot of talk about withdrawal, but it's important for our 
fellow citizens to understand what the consequences would be if we fail, 
if we left before the job was done. There would be a vacuum in the--in 
Iraq, and in that vacuum would flow extremists. Murderers and killers 
would take advantage of the lack of security. That violence could spill 
out across all Iraq. I believe there's a good chance the violence would 
spill out all across the Middle East. I know that people would take 
heart at the fact that the United States of America didn't keep its 
commitment to the moderates and the young--this young democracy.
    It would embolden Al Qaida. Al Qaida has clearly stated--the enemy 
that attacked America has clearly stated that they seek safe haven in 
Iraq, that they want to drive us from Iraq so they can have a safe haven 
from which to plan and plot other attacks. I know that the Iranians 
would see that we left before the job was done, and that would embolden 
them. One of the great dangers facing our children, one of the great 
dangers facing civilization, is an Iran with a nuclear weapon. It's 
important that we succeed in Iraq and send a clear message to the 
people.
    I don't want it to be said 50 years from now: ``What happened to 
America in 2007? How come they forgot the lessons of September the 11th? 
How come they couldn't see the impending dangers facing a generation of 
Americans?'' I want you to know I see the impending dangers. I 
understand the consequences of this historic moment. And we will succeed 
in Iraq.
    I just want you to know our foreign policy is more than just the 
spread of liberty and the protection of our country. I firmly believe 
that to whom much is given, much is required. It's a principle on which 
I try to operate. It's a principle on which I make decisions. I 
understand the consequences of a pandemic like HIV/AIDS on the continent 
of Africa. The United States of America must boldly lead, must not shirk 
from our duty, and must help people wherever we find suffering, to the 
best of our ability.
    I'm proud to announce that since we have put together the 
Presidential initiative on HIV/AIDS in Africa, there have been 850,000 
people receiving antiretroviral drugs, up from 50,000, 3 years ago.
    People have questioned: Is it a necessary action to take? I say it's 
necessary. I say

[[Page 566]]

it's necessary to help relieve human suffering. I also say it's 
necessary to make sure our soul is strong. The spirit of America remains 
intact. Our foreign policy is robust, it is aggressive, and it will lead 
to peace--the peace we all want.
    At home, we're coming down to a campaign next year. A big issue, of 
course, is going to be the economy. I'm looking forward to talking about 
the economy. This economy has been through a lot. You might remember the 
recent economic history of the United States. We went through a 
recession. We had the terrorist attack. We had corporate scandals. We 
had people doubting our capacity to grow our economy. And yet the 
economy has been robust. We've created 7.8 million jobs over the past 4 
years; unemployment is low; inflation is low; wages are rising; the 
entrepreneurial spirit is strong in America. And the question is, how do 
we keep it that way?
    I told you, one of the core principles on which I operate is: I 
believe we ought to trust the people of the United States to make their 
own decisions. And perhaps the best way to exhibit that trust is to let 
you keep more of your own money. When you have more money to spend, this 
economy benefits. And there's a debate here in Washington, DC. There's a 
constant struggle about who best can spend the American people's money. 
Well, I made up my mind a long time ago when I convinced the Congress to 
cut the taxes on everybody who pays taxes. The tax relief is working.
    And now the question is, are we going to let that tax relief expire? 
My answer is, absolutely not. We need to make the tax relief permanent.
    Oh, I know you'll hear them say in Washington and you'll hear them 
campaigning, listen: ``All we've got to do is tax the rich to balance 
the budget.'' That's the same old mantra they trot out about every 
campaign cycle. The problem is, it doesn't work that way in Washington. 
Oh yes, they'll tax you. But if you're middle class, you better watch 
out. See, they can't raise enough money to meet their spending 
ambitions. They'll raise the taxes, but when they do, they'll figure out 
new ways to spend your money.
    The best way to grow this economy and fix this deficit is to keep 
taxes low so the economy grows, which yields more tax revenues, and be 
wise about how we spend your money, be fiscally sound.
    I put forth a budget that eliminates the Federal deficit within the 
next 5 years because we set priorities. And the top priority of this 
Government ought to be, make sure our troops have that which is 
necessary to protect the American people.
    The Democrats pass budgets. They harken back to those old days of 
tax and spend. And I believe when it comes down to it, when they hear 
the clear differences of our points of view and the principles by which 
we make decisions, the American people don't want to return to the days 
of tax and spend.
    I want to talk to you a little bit about education. Education is a 
vital issue for the United States. It's a vital issue to make sure that 
we're a competitive nation in the 21st century. If we don't educate our 
children now, the United States of America will have a hard time being 
the economic leader of the world. I'm an advocate of public schools. You 
might remember, I was once the Governor of the State of Texas. 
[Applause] I'm glad they let you into town. [Laughter]
    I used to say this as Governor: Education is to a State what 
national defense is to the Federal Government. In that statement, 
there's some interesting principles. One, I believe in local control of 
schools. I believe it is essential that the governance of schools take 
place not in Washington but locally. I also believe, however, in this 
principle: that if we spend money, we want to see results, and we've got 
to ask about the results. We spend a fair amount of money here in 
Washington, DC, a lot of money on the schoolchildren, particularly the 
poor

[[Page 567]]

schoolchildren. And that's fine, and that's noble, and it is necessary.
    And so I went to Congress and said: Listen, we'll spend the money, 
but why don't we start asking some important questions, like, can you 
read--[laughter]--can you write; can you add; and can you subtract? I 
believe in measurement. And I believe in measurement not because I want 
to punish anybody, but I believe in measuring so we can correct problems 
early, before it's too late. That piece of legislation is called the No 
Child Left Behind Act. The gap--the achievement gap is closing in 
America. Congress needs to reauthorize that good piece of legislation.
    I'm a strong believer in technology. I believe technology will help 
improve American lives, and I strongly believe that technology will 
enable us to become less dependent on foreign oil. Now I believe that we 
can explore for oil and gas in environmentally friendly ways, and we 
should. But I am deeply concerned about our dependence on oil. It 
creates a national security issue. Plain way of putting it is that, not 
everybody we buy oil from likes us. [Laughter] Having a dependence on 
foreign oil is an economic security issue. When the demand for crude oil 
goes up in the developing world, it causes the price of gasoline to go 
up here in America. Dependence on oil creates an environmental issue.
    So I put forth an innovative way of dealing with our dependence on 
oil, and that is to promote alternative forms of energy to power our 
cars. I believe it makes sense to encourage automobiles to be driven by 
ethanol derived from corn, for example. I want American farmers growing 
energy for American people. I believe strongly that we ought to be 
spending your taxpayers' money to come up with alternative fuel sources, 
like switchgrass. Is it possible? You bet it's possible. It's called 
cellulosic ethanol.
    One of these days, I can't wait to go out West where it's a little 
dry and see all the switchgrass farmers that are growing product 
necessary to produce ethanol so you can drive it in your cars, and we 
become less dependent on foreign sources of oil. It's coming. And the 
role of the United States has got to be to lead and to promote new 
technologies.
    We can do a good job, by the way, of using some of our power sources 
here in America by developing clean coal technologies. We ought to be 
promoting nuclear power that is safe, so that we can be responsible 
stewards of the environment and make sure you got electricity supplies 
as we head out into the 21st century. No, we got a comprehensive energy 
plan that makes a lot of sense, that is going to call upon the ingenuity 
of the American people and make sure this economy remains the leader in 
the world.
    I want to talk about health care. There's a principle involved in 
health care I want to share with you, and that is we want consumers 
making decisions. We want patients and their doctors making decisions, 
not insurance agents and not the Federal Government, when it comes to 
health care.
    I called for reform in the Tax Code. I believe there ought to be a 
standard tax deduction for health insurance like there's a standard tax 
deduction for dependents. And the reason why I believe that is because I 
believe it's important for us to encourage the development of an 
individual market, so individuals can buy good health care, so there can 
be more risk spread across more people, so there's a vibrant market for 
people to be able to--if you're not employed, or if you're a small-
business owner, that you can go--or employed without insurance--you can 
find a product that will give you that security.
    What I don't want to do is encourage the Federal Government to run 
the health care system. I think that would be a huge mistake. I think 
it's important to promote policies that say the consumer matters when it 
comes to buying health care needs. And that's exactly what this 
administration is doing.

[[Page 568]]

    By the way, there's some other practical things we can do. We can 
promote health savings accounts, which all empower the individual that 
says, we trust you. Here's a way for you to have health insurance, and 
we trust you to make the decisions. We can expose prices. I don't know 
how many of you ever shopped for medical care. I know I haven't. I don't 
remember asking anybody: ``Let me see the lists. How do you price your 
product relative to the neighbor?'' I've never seen a hospital say, 
``Well, here's my prices compared to my--to the hospital down the 
road.'' There needs to be more transparency when it comes to pricing, so 
consumers can make rational choices.
    One thing is for certain: We've got to make sure, if you want health 
care to be available and affordable, to have good policies that counter 
this notion of driving good docs out of business. What I'm telling you 
is there's too many junk lawsuits suing too many doctors, and we need to 
have medical liability reform in the United States of America.
    I hope you get a sense of the philosophy that I think needs to be 
inherent in good policy. And that is, we trust you, and we trust in the 
ingenuity of the American people. We believe the future is brighter. 
We're putting good policy in place to encourage that bright future.
    I've got another job, by the way, and it's to make sure one branch 
of our Government is sound and solid and reflects a philosophy that I 
campaigned on. And it's this: Judges should strictly interpret the law 
and not legislate from the bench. And I will continue to name--
[applause]--continue to name good, solid judges that adhere to that 
principle.
    You know, people ask me all the time, ``Do you enjoy being the 
President?'' And my answer is, absolutely. I love being your President. 
I like being the Commander in Chief. I enjoy being the educator in 
chief. I like talking about what we believe in because I firmly believe 
the philosophy we believe in is best for America. I believe it is the 
type of philosophy that inspires people. I believe it's a philosophy 
that inherits the greatness of our economy. I believe that we are the 
party of the entrepreneur. I believe we're the party of the doer, the 
dreamer, the people that work. I believe we're the party of low taxes. 
And I know we're the party of strong national defense to protect the 
United States of America.
    And so I appreciate you coming tonight. Thanks for giving me a 
chance to share with you some ideas. But more importantly, thank you for 
contributing of your hard-earned money to make sure that this great 
Republican Party is ready for the task ahead.
    May God bless our country. May God bless you. Thanks for coming.

Note: The President spoke at 7:02 p.m. at the D.C. Armory. In his 
remarks, he referred to Michael Duncan, chairman, Republican National 
Committee; Elliott Broidy, chairman and chief executive officer, Broidy 
Capital Management; and Gen. David H. Petraeus, USA, commanding general, 
Multi-National Force--Iraq.