[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book II)]
[October 26, 2006]
[Pages 1920-1927]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Luncheon for Congressional Candidate Jeffery 
Lamberti and Iowa Victory 2006 in Des Moines, 
Iowa
October 26, 2006

    Thanks for coming. Please be seated. Thank you for the warm Iowa 
welcome. It's kind of like old home week here when I look around. 
[Laughter] It's good to be in the midst of a lot of friends who made 
possible for me to stand here and address you as the President of the 
United States.
    I'm proud to be here with Jeff Lamberti. No doubt in my mind he is 
going to be the next Congressman from this congressional district. He is 
smart, he is capable,

[[Page 1921]]

he is accomplished, he listens, and he cares. The right man to represent 
the Third Congressional District in Iowa is Jeff Lamberti.
    I not only feel that way, but Laura feels 
that way. [Laughter] She sends her best to Jeff and Shannon and their family. She sends her best to you all. She 
has got to be the most patient woman in America. [Laughter] I also 
happen to believe, in all due respect to my mother, she's the greatest First Lady our country has ever 
had.
    I am proud to be here with one of the finest United States Senators 
any State has ever produced in Chuck Grassley. Jeffrey, if you want to learn how to win, hire Grassley. 
[Laughter] Jeff and I were talking about what we can do together when he 
wins. And I said, well, why don't we work with Senator Grassley and 
Congressman Tom Latham, who is with us, and 
Congressman Steven King, who is with us, to make 
sure that this renewable fuels initiative we started continues to remain 
an important part of not only the Iowa economy but an important part of 
making sure we become less dependent on foreign sources of oil.
    I can remember when this guy from Texas came here in 2000 and said, 
``I support ethanol.'' I think old Grassley didn't really believe me. [Laughter] I think he kind of 
thought, well, maybe that's just typical political talk. I meant what I 
said, and I mean what I say today. I'm looking forward to working with 
this new Congressman to make sure that we use Iowa farm crops to power 
the U.S. economy.
    I do appreciate Congressman Latham coming 
down to say hello to the man you'll be serving with. And I appreciate 
Congressman Steve King coming over to be here 
with Jeff. These are two fine, fine Members of the United States 
Congress. I'm proud to call them friends. I'm proud to serve with you on 
behalf of the United States.
    I ran into State Auditor Dave Vaudt. I 
said, ``How's your campaign going?'' [Laughter] He said, ``Pretty 
good.'' [Laughter] What's it like to run unopposed? [Laughter] But I'm 
proud of you, Dave, and I'm glad you're here with your wife, 
Jeanie. Thanks for coming. Now that you've got 
a little spare time on your hands, why don't you help our man get 
elected here in the Third Congressional District?
    The next secretary of state of Iowa is somebody I know quite well. I 
used to see her all the time in the Oval Office; Mary Ann Hanusa is with us today. Thanks for running. Vote for her. 
She'll do a fine job.
    I'm proud that members of the ex-Governors club are with us. 
[Laughter] I'm a member. [Laughter] Two of the better members are here: 
Governor Ray and Governor Branstad, two of the finest public servants the State has had. 
Thank you for coming. I particularly look forward to telling 
Mother and Dad 
that you're looking just fine, Bob. [Laughter] And so are they.
    I want to thank all the grassroots activists who are here. I 
appreciate the chairman of the Iowa party, Ray Hoffmann. Thank you for coming. I want to thank all of you who are 
involved with helping this good man. I appreciate you giving--helping 
fill the hat. But I also want to encourage you to make sure you do more 
than contribute just of your money. I ask you to contribute of your time 
and your efforts. There's nothing better for a candidate coming down the 
stretch in a campaign to know that he's got a lot of folks standing side 
by side with him. I ask you to make the phone calls and put up the signs 
and turn out the vote.
    I know the other side is already dancing in the end zone, except 
they haven't made the end zone yet. [Laughter] They're up there in 
Washington already kind of picking out their offices and measuring the 
drapes. [Laughter] This campaign only ends after the voters have had a 
chance to speak. No doubt in my mind, with your help, Dave [Jeff]* 
Lamberti will be the next United States Congressman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *White House correction.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 1922]]

    Dave [Jeff]* and I believe a lot of things. We believe that you 
ought to keep more of your own money. We believe in family values. We 
believe values are important. And we believe marriage is a fundamental 
institution of civilization.
    Yesterday in New Jersey, we had another activist court issue a 
ruling that raises doubts about the institution of marriage. I believe 
that marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and I believe it's a 
sacred institution that is critical to the health of our society and the 
well-being of families, and it must be defended. And I'm looking forward 
to working with Jeff Lamberti to do just that.
    I think one of the biggest issues in this campaign is, is what's 
going to happen to the money in your pocket. A big issue in this 
campaign is whether you're going to have more money to spend as you see 
fit. This election is going to have a direct impact on your family 
budget. When you go to the voting booth less than 2 weeks from today, 
the lever you pull will determine the taxes you pay. Americans will cast 
their ballots on November the 7th, but you're going to feel the results 
every April 15th. And make no mistake about it, there is a big 
difference in philosophy when it comes to taxes.
    We believe--the Congressman-to-be and I believe--the 
Senator, Congressman-to-be, and 
two Congressmen and I 
believe that we think you can spend your money far better than the 
Federal Government can spend your money. We believe that when you have 
more of your own money in your pocket to save, spend, or invest, the 
economy benefits. We believe that the more money there is in the hands 
of private citizens, the more likely it is people from all walks of life 
will be able to realize the American Dream. That's what we believe.
    Not only do we believe that; that's what we acted on. I was proud to 
sign the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was the President of the 
United States. And I thank Chairman--yes, Chairman Grassley--see, he's the chairman of the Finance 
Committee--for taking the lead. These tax cuts would not have happened 
without the leadership of Chuck Grassley nor without the support of 
Latham and King.
    And now the results of the tax cuts are in. What matters in this 
business is results--that's what matter. And the results are strong. 
Because of the tax cuts we passed, small businesses flourish, the farm 
economy is strong, American families have got more money in their 
pocket. The United States economy is the envy of the industrialized 
world.
    The Democrats said the tax cuts were not a solution for the economy 
that was slipping into a recession. The truth is that the tax cuts have 
helped make the American economy the fastest growing of any major 
industrialized nation. The Democrats said the tax cuts would lead to a 
jobless recovery. The truth is that our economy has added jobs for 37 
months in a row, and since August of 2003, our economy has created 6.6 
million new jobs.
    The Democrats have said the tax cuts would not help increase wages. 
The truth is that real wages have grown 2.2 percent over the past year. 
The Democrats said tax cuts would cause the deficit to explode. Well, 
the truth is the tax cuts led to economic growth, and that economic 
growth helped send our tax revenues soaring. As a matter of fact, we cut 
the deficit in half 3 years ahead of schedule.
    And now the Democrats have another prediction--they're predicting 
they're going to win this November 7th. The truth is, if their 
electoral--election predictions are as good as their economic 
predictions--[laughter]--Lamberti is going to win.
    One big reason we're going to win is because the truth is, the 
Democrats will raise your taxes. You know, you're not going to hear much 
about it; they're not going to go bragging about that fact. But they've 
got a record they're going to have to run on. They're going to have to 
answer to the

[[Page 1923]]

voters why, time and time again, they voted against the tax cuts we 
passed.
    They don't want you to know the truth. As a matter of fact, 
recently, the top Democrat leader in the House 
made an interesting declaration. She said, ``We love tax cuts.'' Given 
her record, she must be a secret admirer. [Laughter] It's just not--just 
the so-called tax cuts for the rich she opposes. When we cut taxes for 
everyone who pays income taxes, she and her colleagues voted against 
them. When we reduced the marriage penalty, she and her colleagues voted 
against them. When we cut the taxes on small businesses, she and her 
colleagues voted against them. When we lowered the taxes for families 
with children, she and her colleagues voted against them. When we put 
the death tax on the road to extinction, she and her colleagues voted 
against it. Time and time again, when she had the opportunity to show 
her love for taxes, she voted no. If this is the Democrats' idea of 
love--[laughter]--I wouldn't want to see what hate looks like. 
[Laughter]
    Now they're throwing out the same old line. I don't know if it's 
happening in this campaign, but in district after district, you can hear 
them saying, ``Oh, we're just going to tax the rich.'' But that's not 
the way it works when you've got a spending appetite as big as their 
appetite. You might remember what happened in 1992. They said, ``We're 
going to run on middle-class tax cuts. Elect us, we're going to cut the 
taxes on the middle class.'' Sure enough, they got elected, and we had 
the largest--one of the largest tax increases in American history.
    Now, the way it works is this: If the tax cuts we pass are not made 
permanent and they are left to expire, your taxes are going up. See, 
these tax cuts we passed are set to expire. And if they were to expire--
something I'm against and something Jeff Lamberti is against and 
something Senator Grassley is against and these two Congressmen are 
against--your taxes go up. And make no mistake about it, the Democrats 
want these tax cuts to expire.
    Why do I say that? Recently the ranking Democrat on the House Ways 
and Means Committee--that's the committee that decides the level of your 
taxes--said he can't think of one of the tax cuts that he would extend. 
Those are his words, not mine. Asked if that meant he would consider tax 
hikes across the income spectrum, he answered, ``No question about it.''
    I want you to think about that, what happens if the tax cuts aren't 
made permanent. Say you're just sitting around the breakfast table, and 
you have three children. If those tax cuts are not made permanent, you 
could look at that child and say, $500 more on my taxes going to go up. 
Or you can look at that other child sitting there with you, that's 
another 500. If you got three children, your taxes are going up $1,500. 
Now, that may not seem like a lot to these Washington, DC, Democrats, 
but it's a lot to the working people here in Iowa. The best way to make 
sure your taxes stay low, the best way to make sure we keep economic 
vitality alive, is to elect Jeff Lamberti to the United States Congress.
    The biggest issue facing this country, as far as I'm concerned, is 
the security of the United States of America. I think about it every 
day. Every day I am briefed about the fact that there's still an enemy 
that lurks, plans, and plots and wants to kill Americans. I wish I did 
not have to report that. You know, when I campaigned here in 2000, I 
said [didn't say],* ``I want to be a war President.'' No President wants 
to be a war President, but I am one. Not because the United States chose 
war, but because an enemy chose to attack us. And these folks are 
lethal, and they are brutal. And the best way to deal with them is to 
bring them to justice before they can hurt the American people again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *White House correction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    We face an enemy that has an ideology that is the opposite of what 
we believe.

[[Page 1924]]

We believe in freedoms. We believe in the universality of freedom. We 
believe in the right for people to choose how they worship. We believe 
in freedom of the press. We believe in freedom of dissent. They don't 
believe in any of those freedoms. And what makes this war a tough war is 
that they're willing to kill innocent women and children to achieve 
their objectives. And they have objectives. They want to establish a 
governing authority from Spain to Indonesia in which they can impose 
their dark vision of the world. These are their words. The Commander in 
Chief must take the words of the enemy very seriously, particularly 
since the most important job that we have in Washington, DC, is to 
protect the American people from further attack.
    Here at the homeland, we must be right 100 percent of the time in 
order to protect you, and the enemy only has to be right one time. And 
so therefore, after 9/11, after September the 11th, 2001, I vowed to 
give our professionals all the tools necessary to protect the American 
people from further attack. For example, if Al Qaida or an Al Qaida 
affiliate was making a phone call into the United States of America, in 
order to make sure that we're doing our job to protect you, we've got to 
understand what that person is saying. If the enemy is making a phone 
call, in this different kind of war that requires instant information to 
protect you, we better understand what the enemy is thinking and what 
they're planning.
    Recently the terrorist surveillance program came up for a vote in 
the Halls of the United States Congress. Our Members stood strong in 
understanding that the number-one responsibility is to protect the 
American people and that we must give our professionals the tools 
necessary to protect you. Over 80 percent of the Democrats voted no, in 
giving the professionals the tools they need. There's just a different 
mindset in Washington, DC, in what we believe. They must not fear the 
enemy. You cannot wait to respond to the enemy after we have been 
attacked. To protect the American people, we have got to make sure.
    This is a different kind of war. I see we've got vets here, and I 
want to thank you for serving. But this is a war unlike any we have 
fought before. In past wars, you could determine success based upon the 
number of ships sunk or airplanes down or territory taken. This is a war 
that is global in nature, fought on a myriad of fronts, that requires 
precise knowledge as how to interface and react with this enemy. We pick 
people up off the battlefield. We pick people off the battlefield like 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who our 
intelligence services believe was the mastermind of the attacks that 
killed over 3,000 of our citizens on September the 11th.
    I felt that it was important to understand and find out what Khalid 
Sheikh Mohammed knew, in order to 
protect you. I authorized the professionals of the Central Intelligence 
Agency to set up a program to inquire to Mr. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 
about what he knew. This bill came in front of the United States 
Congress to authorize the Government to be able to do so. Over 80 
percent of the Democrats in the House of Representatives voted against 
giving our professionals the tools necessary to gain information so that 
we can protect you.
    There is a difference of opinion, and our voters in Iowa and across 
the country must understand that the Democrats have a different view 
about this war on terror, a view that I think makes America less secure 
and makes it harder for us to do our job to protect the American people.
    This front--this war on terror is on many fronts. And the central 
front right now is in Iraq. The lessons of September the 11th are many. 
One, we've got to stay on the offense and keep the enemy on the run. 
It's hard to plan, plot, and attack if you're on the run. It's hard to 
plan, plot, and attack if you're in a cave. And we got great 
professionals who are constantly keeping the pressure on this enemy. But 
there's

[[Page 1925]]

another lesson of September the 11th, and I just mentioned it--we cannot 
afford to wait when we see a threat. If this is a different kind of war, 
this country of ours must take threats seriously before they fully 
materialize. Saddam Hussein was a threat; the 
world is better off without Saddam Hussein in power.
    And now the fundamental question is, does this country have the 
wherewithal and the perseverance to help this young democracy flourish 
in the heart of the Middle East? I will tell you, it's important to 
defeat the enemy overseas so we do not have to face them here at home.
    It's tough fighting in Iraq. It's tough fighting because there are 
folks there who understand the stakes in this important battle in the 
war on terror. They understand that if we lose our nerve and leave 
before the job is done that they will be able to gain safe haven from 
which to launch further attacks. They understand that if the United 
States were to withdraw, it would be a significant victory for them in 
the war on terror. It would embolden them to recruit. It would enable 
them to more likely topple moderate governments.
    I want you to envision a world 20 to 30 years from now in which 
there are violent forms of radicals--violent radicals fighting for power 
in the Middle East, in which moderate governments have been toppled, in 
which oil resources will have been used in order to blackmail Western 
countries into retreat. And couple all that with an Iran with a nuclear 
weapon, and a generation of Americans will look at our generation and 
say, ``What happened to them? Couldn't they see the threats? Weren't 
they able to see the dangers?'' Well, I want you to know I understand 
the dangers. I see--clearly see the threats. We will help this young 
democracy in Iraq succeed.
    We will help the Iraqis defend their democracy. We will help this 
country become a nation that can govern itself and sustain itself and 
defend itself and serve as an ally in the war on terror. We will stand 
with the 12 million folks who went to the polls and said they want to 
live in freedom. We'll help train the Iraqis so they can take the fight 
to the enemy, and then our boys and girls will come home with the honor 
they have earned.
    There's a mighty debate in the United States of America on this 
important subject. I will tell you, if we leave before the job is done, 
we will have let down a generation of Americans. If we leave before the 
job is done, we will have not honored the sacrifice of incredibly brave 
men and women who wear our uniform. If we leave before the job is done, 
we will embolden a dangerous enemy that still wants to strike the United 
States of America. No question, the fighting is tough, but the United 
States of America has done this kind of tough fighting before. We will 
adjust our tactics. We will support our troops. We will fight, and we 
will win in Iraq.
    There is a difference of opinion in Washington on this important 
issue. The Democrat leadership and many of the Democrats have a more 
limited view of the war on terror. Recently the top Democrat in the 
House, who wants to become the Speaker, said 
this on a nationally televised interview: She said, quote, ``It's not 
right to say that Iraq is part of the war on terror.'' She said, 
instead, ``The war on terror is the war in Afghanistan.''
    Her position must come as news to Usama bin Laden, who has proclaimed that the ``third world war is raging 
in Iraq.'' Her position would come as news to the number-two man of Al 
Qaida, who has called the struggle in Iraq ``the place for the greatest 
battle.'' Her position would come as news to the terrorists from Syria, 
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and other countries who come 
to Iraq to fight the rise of democracy and the United States. Her 
position must come as news to the people of Iraq who have lost loved 
ones to terrorist car bombings and assassinations and attacks in markets 
and

[[Page 1926]]

mosques. Her position would come as news to the American troops in Iraq 
who are risking their lives every day to fight the terrorists and 
prevent them from regaining the safe haven like they had in Afghanistan.
    Her position on the war on terror, that it's contained only to 
Afghanistan, would come as news to the people in London and Madrid and 
Oman and Bali and Beslan and Riyadh and Istanbul and Casablanca and 
other cities where the terrorists have massacred and murdered innocent 
men, women, and children.
    Her position in the war on terror is wrong. You cannot win a war if 
you do not believe we are in a war. It's very important for the citizens 
of this important State to understand that if we leave Iraq before the 
job is done, the enemy will follow us here. The best way to secure the 
peace for the United States, the best way to do--the most important job 
of the Federal Government is to support the troops, to support the young 
democracy, and defeat the enemy in Iraq and--what we'll do. And I'm 
proud to be standing here with Jeff Lamberti, who understands the stakes 
in this war.
    We've got one other asset at our disposal I want to share with you, 
and that is the power of liberty. One of my favorite stories to share is 
the story that happened here a couple of weeks ago--or weeks ago--when I 
went to Elvis's place in Memphis with then-sitting Prime Minister 
Koizumi of Japan. The reason I like to 
share that story is because it's got a good lesson for our citizens, 
particularly younger citizens who may not have really studied that 
period of history too much, the history of Japan-U.S. relations.
    People say, ``Why did you go down there?'' Well, I'd never been. 
[Laughter] And the Prime Minister, he 
wanted to go. [Laughter] He was an Elvis fan. [Laughter] But here's the 
story I want to tell. My dad fought the 
Japanese. He was an 18-year-old kid who volunteered, just like a lot of 
our troops are doing today--they're all volunteers. By the way, these 
men and women understand the stakes. They understand the consequences of 
early retreat. They know what it's like to give up the ground to an 
enemy. They have volunteered during dangerous times. I want to thank you 
for your service, brother. Thanks for joining us.
    That's what happened, too, after the Japanese attacked us, see. By 
the way, we lost more people on September the 11th than we did at Pearl 
Harbor. But a lot of the young folks signed up. One of them was George 
H.W. Bush. And he and a lot of other brave 
Americans fought tooth and nail to defeat the Japanese. They were the 
sworn enemy of the United States. And it was a bloody conflict, a tough 
fight. And yet, some 60 years later, the Navy pilot's son is on Air 
Force One flying down to Elvis's place talking about the peace.
    You see, on the flight down, the Prime Minister of Japan, our former enemy, and I talked about what we could 
do to work together to make the world a more peaceful place. We talked 
about the fact that Japan had 1,000 troops in Iraq to help that young 
democracy fight off the extremists and moderates--to help the moderates 
fight off the extremists. See, Prime Minister Koizumi and I understand 
we're in an ideological struggle between moderate people and people who 
just want to live in peace and extremists and radicals who want to 
impose their view. He understands that. And he knows that as a free 
nation, we need to help struggling democracies survive if we want there 
to be peace for our children and our grandchildren.
    And we talked about North Korea. We talked about helping HIV/AIDS 
victims in Africa. We talked about making this world a better place. 
Isn't it interesting that the son of a man 
who fought the Japanese is able to talk the peace with the Prime 
Minister of a former enemy? What happened 
was, Japan adopted a Japanese-style democracy. The power of the--of that 
lesson is this: Liberty has got the capacity

[[Page 1927]]

to transform an enemy into an ally, just like liberty has got the 
capacity to transform a region of hate into a region of hope. Someday an 
American President will be talking with elected leaders from the Middle 
East about the peace, and a generation of Americans, a generation to 
come, will be better off for it.
    These are the stakes in this election. I'm proud you're here. Thank 
you for standing with Jeff. Take it to the final day, and he'll win. God 
bless.

Note: The President spoke at 12:42 p.m. at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. 
In his remarks, he referred to Robert Ray and Terry Branstad, former 
Governors of Iowa; former President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; Usama bin 
Laden, leader of the Al Qaida terrorist organization; and Ayman Al-
Zawahiri, founder of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and senior Al Qaida 
associate.