[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book II)]
[September 21, 2006]
[Pages 1676-1682]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Reception for Congressional Candidate Gus 
Bilirakis in Tampa, Florida
September 21, 2006

    Gus, thanks. There's nothing wrong with a son following in his 
father's footsteps, particularly when you've got such a good son as Gus 
Bilirakis. [Laughter] He's the right man for the United States Congress, 
and I appreciate you all coming to support him.
    I've been looking for Brother. [Laughter] He 
claims he's working. [Laughter] But I know he sends his best. He, like 
me, recognizes that Gus is the right man to serve you in the United 
States Congress. He really is. He's a good, decent, honorable, family-
oriented man who will represent the interests of the folks down here. So 
Jeb sends his best.
    But more importantly, so does Laura. 
[Laughter] Like me, Gus married well--

[[Page 1677]]

[laughter]--and it was my privilege to meet Eva 
and the four boys who are here. It's good to see you guys. Thanks for 
coming. Thanks for helping Dad get elected. He's going to need your help 
putting up those signs. And he's going to need the help of a family 
standing with him. And that's why it's important to have people who go 
to Washington, DC, who have prioritized their families. And the 
Bilirakis is a family-oriented group of folks. They understand that 
families are important for a stable society, and I'm proud to be here 
with Gus and all his friends.
    Thank you all for coming. It's not easy to have a fundraiser this 
successful, it really isn't. And I know how much work it took, Gus, to 
convince this many people for coming. It's a good sign when you're 
running for Congress, Gus, and you get this many people to stand up and 
say, ``We're willing to help you.'' And for those of you who have given, 
thanks. And for those of you who wonder if there's still more to do, 
there is. And so I urge you to think about putting up signs and getting 
on the telephone and turning out the votes. Go to your churches and 
places of worship, community centers, and remind people, when you've got 
somebody who is honest and decent and who shares the values of the 
people in Tampa, vote for him and send him to Washington, DC.
    We not only married well, we share something else in common: We've 
got strong-willed mothers. [Laughter] And I'm glad to be here with 
Evelyn. The only difference between Ms. 
Bilirakis and my mother is, my mother's hair is 
white. [Laughter] Both of them speak their mind. As a matter of fact, 
when I ran into Miss Bilirakis earlier, she said to me--this is in 
Washington--she says, ``My boy is running, and you get down there and 
help him as quickly as you can.'' [Laughter] Isn't that right? 
[Laughter] I'm proud to be with you. And thanks for serving. You married 
a good man. He served this district well, 
as will his son.
    I'm proud to be here with Congresswoman Katherine Harris, running for the United States Senate. I want to 
thank Bing Kearney, who is the event chairman, 
and all the organizers. Appreciate you coming. Thanks for your help.
    I'm looking forward to the campaign. I'm looking forward to 
reminding the American people there are significant differences in 
between what our party believes and what the other party believes. If 
there's a--it's easy to tell us apart. And the first place you can start 
is looking at taxes. There's a fundamental difference in this campaign 
and campaigns all across the country about who best to spend your money. 
We believe that the best people to spend your money is you. We believe 
that once you set priorities, it's important to have money in their 
pocket, because we know that when you save, invest, and spend, it helps 
this economy grow.
    And so working with Members of the United States Congress, we passed 
the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was the President. We cut the 
taxes on everybody who pays income taxes. We doubled the child credit. 
We reduced the marriage penalty. We didn't think it made sense, by the 
way, to penalize marriage. We think in society, you ought to encourage 
marriage.
    We cut the taxes on capital and--capital gains and dividends to 
encourage investment. We understand the role of Government is not to 
create wealth but to create an environment in which the entrepreneurial 
spirit flourishes. We put the death tax on the road to extinction, 
because we want to help our small businesses and farmers. There should 
be no doubt in anybody's mind where we stand on cutting taxes.
    And the Democrats in Washington have got a record of their own, and 
there should be no doubt in anybody's mind where they stand. When we 
first cut taxes back in 2001 to get this economy going, when we cut 
taxes to recover from a recession, when we cut taxes to make sure we 
recovered

[[Page 1678]]

from a corporate scandal, almost 85 percent of the House Democrats voted 
against it. When we cut taxes in 2003, nearly 95 percent of the House 
Democrats voted against you having more money in your pocket. And when 
we extended the key tax cuts earlier this year, more than 92 percent of 
the House Democrats voted against it. I think you're beginning to get a 
drift of their philosophy about your money.
    One leading Democrat predicted this: He said 
the tax cuts would do nothing to create jobs. That's what they were 
saying when we said we were going to cut the taxes on the small-business 
owners and the working people to make sure you had more money in your 
pocket, which would stimulate job growth. And one of the leaders said, ``No, that's not going to do anything to create 
jobs.'' Well, since those words were uttered in May of 2003, our economy 
has added nearly 5.7 million new jobs. That's more jobs than Canada, 
France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, all put together. This 
economy is strong because of progrowth economic policies.
    You see, what our opponents don't understand is that the economy 
grows when you control more of your own money. The tax cuts we passed 
put more than a trillion dollars in the hands of American workers and 
families and businesses. And you used that money to help us become a 
strong economy, the world leader.
    And now we've got a choice to make, and that's what elections are 
all about, giving the people clear choices. Do you want to keep your 
taxes low so we can keep the economy growing, or do we raise taxes and 
let the politicians in Washington try to grow the economy?
    Gus has made his position clear, and so have I. We're going to let 
you keep more of your own money. But the Democrats have made their 
position clear too. I want you to remember, the last time they had 
control of the United States Congress back in 1993, they passed a 
massive tax increase. In the 13 years since then, they've worked hard to 
sustain their record as the party of high taxes.
    A majority of House Democrats have voted against reducing the 
marriage penalty not once, not twice, but 26 times. It's a clear record. 
A majority of House Democrats have voted against a higher child tax 
credit 19 times. It's a clear record. If they get control of the House 
of Representatives, they'll raise your taxes, and it will hurt our 
economy, and that's why we're not going to let them get control of the 
House of Representatives--and elect people like Gus Bilirakis.
    Just this week, the top Democrat on 
the House tax-writing committee said this--it's important for the 
American people to know there's a difference in point of view; they just 
think differently, got different philosophies about to do--what to do 
with your money. Here's what the top Democrat said on the committee 
that's going to write--determine what happens to your taxes. He said, 
``I can't think of one of our tax cuts that should be extended.''
    That's one way of saying, they're going to raise your taxes, 
because, you see, if you don't extend the tax cuts, your taxes go up. 
They may not call it a tax increase; they may want you to think 
something different. But if they don't extend the tax cuts that are set 
to expire, the working people, the small-business owners, those who are 
struggling to put food on the table for their families, the taxes are 
going to go up.
    Now, they're going to say--they may not tell you they're going to 
raise your taxes. They're just going to say they're just going to let 
the tax relief expire. That's like a boss who came in and said, ``You 
know something, I'm going to let your last pay raise expire.'' 
[Laughter] We're not going to let it happen. We're going to make it 
clear the differences between our desire to keep your taxes low and 
their desire to run your taxes up. Good economic policy says, we got 
plenty of taxes in Washington, DC; let's make sure the entrepreneurs and

[[Page 1679]]

small businesses have enough money in their pocket to expand this job 
base so people can find work.
    And I'm looking forward to talking about this until election day. I 
think it's a big issue. I think there are plenty of people across the 
country--Republicans, discerning Democrats, and wise independents--who 
understand they're paying plenty of taxes to Washington, DC. Oh, you'll 
hear this; they're going to say--and Gus, I'm sure you'll have to deal 
with this--they're going to say, ``Look, we've got to raise your taxes 
to balance the budget.'' That's not the way Washington, DC, works. They 
will raise your taxes and figure out new ways to spend your money. The 
best way to balance the budget is to keep progrowth economic policies in 
place that are generating additional tax revenues into the Treasury and 
be wise about how we spend your money.
    We've got to set clear priorities in Washington, DC, and the top 
priority is to make sure our troops will have what it takes to defend 
the United States of America.
    There's a lot of issues. A lot of issues will be--I'll be working 
with Gus on. One issue, of course, is to make sure we diversify our 
energy supplies. We've got to make sure we get off of hydrocarbons as 
quickly as possible. But in the meantime, we'll be exploring for 
hydrocarbons, and we'll do so in an environmentally friendly way that 
protects the coast of the State of Florida. I told you that I would 
support reasonable limits, extended limits, about offshore drilling, and 
I've kept my word to the Governor. I've kept my 
word to the people of Florida, and I'm going to continue working with 
this Congressman to make sure that we have good, sane energy policy.
    I'm going to continue to work with this Congressman-to-be on making 
sure seniors have got prescription drugs that they can afford. You might 
remember, before I came into Washington, DC, Medicare was an important 
policy, but it was growing tired and old. Medicine was changing--there's 
a lot of doctors out here who know what I'm talking about--Medicare 
wasn't changing with it. It was a system that just simply wasn't meeting 
the needs of our seniors. So I said to Congress, ``Why don't we 
modernize Medicare; why don't we make sure that our seniors have got 
prescription drug coverage as a part of a modern Medicare system.''
    We worked hard; we got the legislation out. And now I'm going to 
make sure we work with the United States Congress, the new Congress 
after this election, to make sure the Medicare reforms we put in place 
that are benefiting seniors of all political parties all across the 
Nation don't get watered down by people who think the best way to run 
medicine is to have the Federal Government make every single decision.
    I'm looking forward to working with Gus Bilirakis to make sure the 
good reforms we put in place to make sure every child gets a good 
education stays there. The No Child Left Behind Act is making a 
significant difference for the United States of America, and 
Congressman, I look forward to working with you on its reauthorization.
    And I'm looking forward to working with this good man to keep the 
peace. This is a nation at war. And we've got to have people in the 
United States Congress who see the world the way it is, not the way we 
would like it to be. We can't afford to not be realistic about the world 
in which we live. The stakes are too high. There's an enemy that still 
wants to attack us. I wish I could report otherwise, but that is not the 
reality of the world in which we live. And therefore, the most important 
job the Congressman will have--will--to join with other Members of 
Congress and the administration to protect the United States of America.
    If somebody is--associated with Al Qaida is making a phone call into 
the United States of America, we want to know why, so we can protect the 
United States against further attack. If somebody associated with 
terrorism is moving money around, we need to know why, so we can protect 
the

[[Page 1680]]

United States of America from attack. If there are walls that make it 
hard for intelligence gatherers and those charged with protecting this 
country, make it hard for them to communicate, we want to tear down 
those walls so we can protect the United States of America from attack. 
Our most important job in Washington is to protect you, and we'll do 
everything we can.
    I remind people that the enemy has got to be right once, and we got 
to be right 100 percent of the time in order to protect us. So the best 
way to protect the United States of America is to stay on the offense 
and bring the enemy to justice before they come here and hurt us in 
America.
    And that's exactly what we're doing. Every day, you just need to 
know, some of America's finest folks are on the offense. We're running 
down every lead possible. It's hard to plot and plan attacks against the 
United States when you're on the run. I need Members of Congress who 
understand that you can't negotiate with these folks; you can't hope 
that they change their mind; that the best way to protect the American 
people is to defeat them overseas so we do not have to face them here at 
home.
    And the central front on this war on terror is Iraq. Now, I know 
some Americans say, ``Well, it's not associated with the war on 
terror.'' Well, all I ask them to do is listen to what Usama bin 
Laden says when he calls Iraq the third--
world war III. All I ask is that our fellow citizens be realistic about 
the world and listen to the words of senior Al Qaida when they say our 
objective is to--their objective is to run us out of the Middle East so 
they can topple moderate governments, so they could have energy 
resources at their disposal to inflict economic damage on those of us 
who refuse to kowtow to their demands, run us out of the Middle East so 
that they could achieve one of their objectives, which is the 
destruction of our close ally Israel.
    Iraq is a central front in this war on terror, and we've got a plan 
to defeat the enemy. And it starts with answering to the will of 12 
million brave Iraqis who said, when given a chance to vote, ``We want to 
be free.''
    There's big debate about Saddam Hussein. 
My view is today as it was then; he was a threat. You see, after 9/11, 
we had to take threats seriously before they came home to hurt us. In 
order to protect this country--if you think the most important 
obligation of the Federal Government is to protect the country, then you 
must recognize that we do two things. One, if we find somebody harboring 
terrorists, we hold them to account, and we've got to take threats 
seriously before they come home to hurt us. Saddam Hussein was a threat.
    And don't let people rewrite the history of the way the world was. 
He was a state sponsor of terror. He paid 
family of suiciders. He had attacked his neighbors. He had used weapons 
of mass destruction. He was a sworn enemy of the United States of 
America. And he had been given ample time to disclose, disarm, or face 
serious consequences by over a dozen United Nations Security Council 
resolutions. Getting rid of Saddam Hussein was the right thing to do, 
and the world is peaceful because of it. The world is more peaceful 
because of it.
    And the world will be more peaceful when democracy takes hold in 
Iraq. And it's hard work. It's hard work because Al Qaida understands 
that democracies in the Middle East defeat their ideological vision of 
an extremist caliphate. It's hard because Saddamists are upset that 
they're no longer in power. It's hard because people are taking revenge 
for past history. But it's necessary work. It's necessary for our 
security.
    If we were to leave before the mission was done, what kind of signal 
would that send to the extremists and radicals who want to harm either 
the United States or our close allies? What kind of signal would it send 
to the reformers and dreamers of

[[Page 1681]]

a better life, that the United States has lost its will? What kind of 
signal would it send to those who count on the United States for its 
leadership? Our credibility would be damaged. Our enemies would be 
emboldened.
    We're constantly changing tactics, but our strategy has not changed. 
We will help the Iraqis build a military where they can defend their 
freedom. We will help them build the institutions necessary for a free 
society to work. We will do our job and stand by the people of Iraq, and 
the world will be better for it when democracy takes hold.
    You know, people ask me all the time--people ask me all the time, 
you know--they say, ``What do you mean, when democracy takes hold? Do 
you think--really think people in the Middle East want to be free?'' And 
the answer is, absolutely. We believe in the United States and the 
universality of freedom. I personally believe there's an Almighty, and I 
think a great gift from that Almighty is the desire in everybody's soul 
to be free. I'm not talking about just American Methodists. I believe in 
everybody's soul is the desire to be free. And I know that when you look 
at history, liberty has got the capacity to defeat resentment and 
ideologies of hate.
    You know, one of the stories I like to share with people is my 
experience with the Prime Minister of Japan, Prime Minister 
Koizumi. You might remember, I had an 
interesting trip. [Laughter] He and I went down to Elvis's place. 
[Laughter] Went down there for a couple of reasons: One, I had never 
been to Elvis's place, and I'd like to go, you know. I thought it would 
be kind of fun. [Laughter] More importantly, he wanted to go. [Laughter] 
He loves Elvis. [Laughter] He can sing all the songs, you know--
[laughter]--collects the memorabilia.
    But I also wanted to send a signal to the American people about 
what's possible when liberty takes hold. A fellow came through the line 
recently here, and he said, ``My grandfather served on the USS San 
Jacinto with your dad.'' They were in the 
Pacific Ocean, young guys who had been called into action because the 
Japanese had attacked us, and we were in a brutal war with Japan--a 
really tough war.
    The hatred for--of America for Japan was intense, and so intense, 
you can imagine how people would react if somebody had stood up and 
said, ``I predict, someday, an American President and the Japanese Prime 
Minister would be going to, you know, a singer's house.'' [Laughter] 
They would have run him out of town, probably, you know. [Laughter]
    But that's, in fact, what happened. And when we were on the airplane 
going down from Washington to Memphis, we were talking about keeping the 
peace. The Prime Minister of a country 
with which we were at war, a brutal war--young kids went off and never 
came home, unbelievable devastation and destruction in that war, a war 
ended by massive bombing--the Prime Minister of that country and the 
President of the United States were talking about peace. We were talking 
about North Korea, what we could do together to keep the peace. We were 
talking about the need to help this young democracy in the heart of the 
Middle East succeed so it could defeat an ideology of hatred. We were 
talking about how democracy has got the capacity to defeat the 
conditions that create resentment and hopelessness that cause young men 
to decide to become suicide bombers.
    It's an amazing lesson of history, isn't it? It strikes me as so 
ironic, in a way, that my dad fought the 
Japanese, and his son sits down with the Prime Minister of the same country to keep the peace. What 
happened was, Japan adopted a Japanese-style democracy. Liberty has got 
the unbelievable capacity to convert enemies into allies, to change 
nations from hopelessness to hope. Someday, an American President will 
be sitting down talking to duly elected leaders of the Middle East about 
how to

[[Page 1682]]

keep the peace, and a generation of American children will be better off 
for it.
    And those are the stakes. We're in the great ideological struggle of 
the 21st century. It's a struggle playing out now in the Middle East 
between decent, honorable people who want something better for their 
children than war and turbulence versus extremists and radicals who use 
terrorism and murder to create fear. And the United States must lead in 
this ideological struggle to achieve the peace we all want.
    And so I'm proud to stand with a man who sees the world the way it 
is; a person who understands that this great country has got 
responsibilities not only to protect ourselves but responsibilities to 
lay the foundation for peace for generations to come.
    It's an exciting time to be representing the greatest nation on the 
face of the Earth. You'll like it up there, Gus. [Laughter] And I hope 
you all work hard to make sure he gets there. Thanks for coming. May God 
bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 1:36 p.m. at Raymond James Stadium. In his 
remarks, he referred to Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida; Usama bin Laden, 
leader of the Al Qaida terrorist organization; and former President 
Saddam Hussein of Iraq.