    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book II)]
    [August 7, 2006]
    [Pages 1493-1502]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    The President's News Conference With Secretary of State Condoleezza
    Rice in Crawford, Texas
    August 7, 2006

        The President. Good morning. Since the crisis in Lebanon began more
    than 3 weeks ago, the United States and other key nations have been
    working for a comprehensive solution that would return control of
    Lebanon to its Government and to provide a sustainable peace that
    protects the lives of both the Lebanese and the Israeli people.
        Secretary Rice and diplomats from other countries are developing
    United Nations resolutions to bring about a cessation of hostilities and
    establish a foundation for lasting peace.
        The first resolution, which the Security Council is now considering,
    calls for a stop of all hostilities. Under its terms, Hizballah will be
    required to immediately stop all

    [[Page 1494]]

    attacks. Israel will be required to immediately stop all offensive
    military operations. In addition, the resolution calls for an embargo on
    the shipment of any arms into Lebanon, except as authorized by the
    Lebanese Government.
        A second resolution, which the Security Council will begin working
    on as soon as possible, will help establish a sustainable and enduring
    cease-fire and provide a mandate for a robust international force that
    will help the legitimate Government of Lebanon extend its authority over
    all of Lebanon's territory.
        Under this second resolution, the Lebanese Armed Forces, supported
    by the international force, will deploy to southern Lebanon. This
    international force will help Lebanon patrol its border with Syria and
    prevent illegal arm shipments to Hizballah. As these Lebanese and
    international forces deploy, the Israeli Defense Forces will withdraw.
    And both Israel and Lebanon will respect the Blue Line that divides
    them.
        These two resolutions are designed to bring an immediate end to the
    fighting, to help restore sovereignty over Lebanese soil to Lebanese
    democratic government--to Lebanon's democratic Government, excuse me--to
    strike a blow against the terrorists and their supporters, and to help
    bring lasting peace to the region. By taking these steps, it will
    prevent armed militias like Hizballah and its Iranian and Syrian
    sponsors from sparking another crisis. It will protect innocent Lebanese
    and Israelis. And it will help the international community deliver
    humanitarian relief and support Lebanon's revival and reconstruction.
        The loss of life on both sides of the Lebanese-Israeli border has
    been a great tragedy. Millions of Lebanese civilians have been caught in
    the crossfire of military operations because of the unprovoked attack
    and kidnapings by Hizballah. The humanitarian crisis in Lebanon is of
    deep concern to all Americans, and alleviating it will remain a priority
    of my Government.
        I also believe that innocent civilians in Israel should not have to
    live in bunkers in fear of missile attacks. To establish a lasting peace
    that protects innocent civilians on both sides of the border, we must
    address the underlying conditions that are the root cause of this
    crisis.
        I believe that the two resolutions I have discussed and that
    Secretary Rice is working on will put us on that path.
        And now I'll be glad to answer some questions. Nedra [Nedra Pickler,
    Associated Press].

    United Nations Security Council Resolution on the Situation in the
    Middle East

        Q. Thank you, Mr. President. Lebanon has rejected the draft
    proposal, and Israel is not speaking out in support of it. How do you
    get a resolution that both sides will support?
        The President. Everyone wants the violence to stop. People
    understand that there needs to be a cessation of hostilities in order
    for us to address the root causes of the problem. That was the spirit
    that came out of the G-8 conference; it came out of the Rome conference
    that Secretary Rice attended. We all recognize that the violence must
    stop. And so that's what Secretary Rice is working toward with our
    friends and allies.
        Look, everybody is--I understand both parties aren't going to agree
    with all aspects of the resolution. But the intent of the resolutions is
    to strengthen the Lebanese Government so Israel has got a partner in
    peace. The intent of the resolution is to make sure that we address the
    root cause--the resolution is to address the root cause, which was a
    state operating within the state. Hizballah was--or is an armed movement
    that provoked the crisis.
        And so whatever comes out of the resolutions must address that root
    cause. And so the task today for the Secretary and her counterparts is
    to develop a resolution that can get passed. It is essential that we
    create

    [[Page 1495]]

    the conditions for the Lebanese Government to move their own forces,
    with international help, into the south of Lebanon to prevent Hizballah
    and its sponsors from creating this--creating another crisis. And so
    that's where we're headed.
        Steve [Steve Holland, Reuters].

    Level of Violence in the Middle East/United Nations Security Council
    Resolution

        Q. The Lebanese Prime Minister is demanding a quick and decisive
    cease-fire after an Israeli air raid today killed 40 people. When will
    we see this resolution? And if it's approved, when will we see a
    cessation of violence?
        The President. I'll let Condi talk about the details of what she's
    going to do today, if you care to hear from her. But we will work with
    our partners to get the resolution laid down as quickly as possible. And
    the resolution will call for a cessation of violence. And the concern,
    by the way, from the parties in the region is whether or not the
    resolution will create a vacuum into which Hizballah and its sponsors
    will be able to promote more instability.
        We all agree that we ought to strengthen this Government, the
    Lebanese Government--that's the purpose of the resolutions, as well as
    to stop the violence.
        I don't know if you want to comment upon----
        Secretary Rice. First of all, we are working from what we believe to
    be a strong basis for a cessation of hostilities, that is the U.S.-
    French draft, a strong basis for the cessation of hostilities, and then
    as the President said, to have a process then that can address the root
    causes. And we also believe that it's going to be very important that
    this first resolution lay a very quick foundation for passage of a
    second resolution. So these have to be worked, in a sense, together.
        I spoke last night and yesterday with Prime Minister Olmert, with
    Prime Minister Siniora, with Secretary General Kofi Annan, with a number
    of others, and I think we believe that there is a way forward.
        Now, we understand that this has been a very emotional and, indeed,
    devastating and tragic set of circumstances for Lebanon and for Israel.
    And obviously, the parties have views on how to stop this. Their views
    are not going to necessarily be consonant about how to stop it. The
    international community has a view, but, of course, we're going to take
    a little time and listen to the concerns of the parties and see how they
    can be addressed.
        But I want to just note, we believe that the extant draft resolution
    is a firm foundation, is the right basis, but, of course, we're going to
    listen to the concerns of the parties and see how they might be
    addressed. And that's really what's going to be going on today,
    particularly after the Arab League meets and Prime Minister Siniora
    emerges from that.
        The President. Yes, Peter [Peter Wallsten, Los Angeles Times].

    U.S. Armed Forces

        Q. Thanks. Mr. President, officials have been quoted saying that the
    international force would not include U.S. troops. And I wonder if you
    can explain why that is? Is it because the military is already
    overtasked? Is it because you're afraid that the U.S. doesn't have
    credibility in the region?
        The President. No, I think, first of all, there has been a history
    in Lebanon with U.S. troops. Secondly, I have said that if the
    international force would like some help with logistics and command and
    control, we'd be willing to offer logistics and command and control.
    There are some places where--it's like Darfur; people say to me, ``Why
    don't you commit U.S. troops to Darfur as part of an international
    peacekeeping?'' And the answer there is that those troops would be--
    would create a sensation around the world that may not enable us to
    achieve our objective. And so when we commit troops, we commit troops

    [[Page 1496]]

    for a specific reason, with the intent of achieving an objective. And I
    think command and control and logistical support is probably the best--
    is the best use of U.S. forces.
        Mike Fletcher [Washington Post].

    Syria/Iran

        Q. Many strategists say that we'll never get to the bottom of this
    crisis unless the U.S. engages directly with Syria and Iran. Why not
    talk to them directly about this and have a back-and-forth conversation?
        The President. Yes, that's an interesting question. I've been
    reading about that, that people have been posing that question. We have
    been in touch with Syria. Colin Powell sent
    a message to Syria in person. Dick Armitage traveled to Syria. Bill Burns
    traveled to Syria. We've got a consulate office in Syria. Syria knows
    what we think. The problem isn't us telling Syria what's on our mind,
    which is to stop harboring terror and to help the Iraqi democracy
    evolve. They know exactly what our position is. The problem is, is that
    their response hasn't been very positive. As a matter of fact, it hasn't
    been positive at all.
        And in terms of Iran, we made it clear to the Iranians that if they
    would honor previous obligations and verifiably stop enrichment of
    nuclear materials, we would sit at a table. And so there's a way forward
    for both countries. The choice is theirs. Now, I appreciate people
    focusing on Syria and Iran, and we should, because Syria and Iran
    sponsor and promote Hizballah activities--all aimed at creating chaos,
    all aimed at using terror to stop the advance of democracies.
        Our objective, our policy is to give voice to people through
    democratic reform, and that's why we strongly support the
    Siniora Government. That's why I've articulated
    a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, two
    democracies living side by side in peace. That's why Condi went to see
    President Abbas, the President
    of the Palestinian Territories, to assure him that we're committed to a
    democracy. That's why we're making sacrifices in Iraq--to build
    democracy.
        In other words, we believe democracy yields peace. And the actions
    of Hizballah, through its sponsors of Iran and Syria, are trying to stop
    that advance of democracy. Hizballah launched this attack. Hizballah is
    trying to create the chaos necessary to stop the advance of peace. And
    the world community must come together to address this problem.
        Let's see here. Jim [Jim Axelrod, CBS News].

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559

        Q. Mr. President, in the last couple of weeks, every time the
    question was asked, why not get an immediate cessation and then build a
    sustainable--terms for a sustainable cease-fire after you get the
    hostilities stopped, it was categorically rejected. Yet a few weeks
    later, here we are. Can you explain why this wasn't done a couple weeks
    ago?
        The President. Sure. Because, first of all, the international
    community hadn't come together on a concept of how to address the root
    cause of the problem, Jim.
        Part of the problem in the past in the Middle East is people would
    paper over the root cause of the problem, and therefore, the situation
    would seemingly be quiet, and then lo and behold, there'd be another
    crisis. And innocent people would suffer. And so our strategy all along
    has been, of course we want to have a cessation of hostilities, but what
    we want to do in the same time is to make sure that there is a way
    forward for the Lebanese Government to secure its own country so that
    there's peace in the region.
        And that deals with an international peacekeeping force to
    complement a Lebanese army moving into the south to make sure that
    Resolution 1559, passed 2 years ago by the U.N., was fully upheld. Had
    the parties involved fully implemented

    [[Page 1497]]

    1559, which called for the disarmament of Hizballah, we would not be in
    the situation we're in today.
        Let's see here. Yes, Richard [Richard Benedetto, USA Today].

    Diplomatic Efforts in the Middle East

        Q. Mr. President, what are the specific stumbling blocks that are
    preventing this first resolution from being passed quickly? What are the
    people--what are the parties objecting to in the language that needs to
    be altered?
        Secretary Rice. I think that first of all, I don't--I'm not going to
    get into specifics about the views of the parties. I think that we have
    to do that privately and talk with the parties privately. But obviously,
    this particular resolution is important because it sets an agenda for
    the basis for a sustainable peace. And so it will not surprise you that
    the Lebanese have views of what should be on that agenda. The Israelis
    have views of what should be on that agenda. They aren't always the same
    views, and so working together to get to what that agenda should be is
    part of what's going on here.
        But I will say something that's very interesting. There is more
    agreement than you might think about how to prevent, again, a situation
    in which you have a state within a state able to launch an attack across
    the Blue Line.
        For instance, there is agreement that the Lebanese Government needs
    to extend its authority throughout the country, that it needs to have
    the Lebanese Armed Forces move to take care of this vacuum that has been
    existing in the south, that there should not be any armed groups able
    just to operate in the south in the way that Hizballah has been able to
    operate in the south, that there ought to be respect for the Blue Line.
    These are all agreements between the two parties.
        And so there is going to be some pressure from both sides to get
    things onto the agenda because they want to get them onto the agenda.
    But I think we have a reasonable basis here that both sides can accept.
    I think there are some issues of timing and sequence that need to be
    worked out. There are some concerns about when an international force
    would actually be available. And so we're going to continue to work to
    address those concerns of the two parties.
        But as the President said, this last 3 weeks has been extremely
    important. Had we done this 3 weeks ago, we were talking about what
    people--an unconditional cease-fire that I can guarantee you would not
    have addressed any of these items that both sides know are going to have
    to be addressed if we're going to have a sustainable cease-fire in the
    future. So this has been time that's been well spent over the last
    couple of weeks, that everybody agrees it's time to have a cessation.
    We're going to work a little bit more with the parties, and I think this
    resolution will be the right basis, both to cease the hostilities and to
    move forward.
        The President. Sheryl [Sheryl Gay Stolberg, New York Times].

    Diplomatic Negotiations/Situation in the Middle East

        Q. Mr. President, you've spoken with Prime Minister Blair and
    Chancellor Merkel about this. Have you spoken directly with Prime
    Ministers Olmert and Siniora? And if not, why not?
        The President. Because Condi is handling those conversations, and
    she's doing a fine job of doing so.
        Yes.

    Hizballah/War on Terror

        Q. Mr. President, you've been quite specific in Hizballah's role as
    the creator of this conflict. But what is the magnet, what is the
    pressure point, what is the hook to get this group to accept a cease-
    fire, to stop shooting, and to stop kidnaping soldiers from across the
    border of another country?

    [[Page 1498]]

        The President. Yes, I would hope it would be international pressure
    on not only Hizballah, the group of Hizballah within Lebanon, but also
    its sponsors. And that's the whole purpose of the United States working
    with allies and friends, is to send a clear message that sponsoring
    terror is unacceptable. It's the great challenge of the 21st century,
    really.
        Q. Do you----
        The President. Let me finish for a minute.
        Q. I'm sorry.
        The President. It is the great challenge of this century, and it's
    this: As young democracies flourish, terrorists try to stop their
    progress. And it's the great challenge of the United States and others
    who are blessed with living in free countries. Not only do terrorists
    try to stop the advance of democracy through killing innocent people
    within those countries, they also try to shape the will of the Western
    World by killing innocent westerners. They try to spread their jihadist
    message, a message I call--it's totalitarian in nature, Islamic
    radicalism, Islamic fascism. They try to spread it as well by taking the
    attack to those of us who love freedom.
        And as far as this administration is concerned, we clearly see the
    problem, and we're going to continue to work to advance stable, free
    countries. We don't expect every country to look like the United States,
    but we do want countries to accept some basic conditions for a vibrant
    society--human rights, human decency, the power of the people to
    determine the fate of their governments. And, admittedly, this is hard
    work because it flies in the face of previous policy, which basically
    says stability is more important than form of government. And as a
    result of that policy, anger and resentment bubbled forth with an
    attack, with a series of attacks, the most dramatic of which was on
    September the 11th.
        You know, your question is, can we get people to--a terrorist group
    to change their attitude? What we can do is we can get state sponsors of
    terror to understand this behavior is unacceptable and that we can
    convince some people in terrorist groups that there is a better way
    forward for them and their families.
        Remember, Hizballah is a political party within Lebanon. They
    actually ran people for office. The problem is, is that they're a
    political party with a militia that is armed by foreign nations, and
    obviously, this political party with militia was willing to try to
    influence the Middle East through unprovoked attacks.
        And what Condi is working on and I work on is to remind people about
    the stakes in the Middle East. And those stakes include not only helping
    the Lebanese Government firm up its democracy--remember, we worked with
    the French 2 years ago to boot out Syria. Syria was inside Lebanon, and
    we felt that in order for a democracy to flourish, Syria needed to
    remove not only her troops but her agents, her intelligence agents, for
    example.
        And obviously, there are some in the region that don't want the
    Lebanese Government to succeed. I also happen to believe that as Prime
    Minister Olmert was making progress in reaching
    out to President Abbas and
    others in the region to develop a Palestinian state, that that caused a
    terrorist reaction. Remember, this all started with the kidnaping of an
    Israeli soldier by militant Hamas, followed shortly thereafter by the
    kidnaping of two Israeli soldiers by Hizballah.
        And finally, the third most notable battleground in the advance of
    liberty is Iraq. It's interesting; if you go back to the work of Mr.
    Zarqawi, he talked about fomenting sectarian violence in order to stop
    the advance of democracy. The challenge of the 21st century is for free
    nations to help those who aspire to liberty. And, you know, the first
    question is, do people aspire to liberty? And the answer is,
    absolutely--look at the 12 million people who voted in Iraq. Or look at
    the people who went to the

    [[Page 1499]]

    polls in Lebanon. It's just clear to me that there will be terrorist
    activities that will try to stop people from living a decent, hopeful
    life.
        And what you're watching now is diplomatic efforts to address the
    problem. I know there's--I sense a certain impatience in your voice
    about diplomacy coming to a conclusion. What Secretary Rice is doing, as
    well as me, is we are dealing with a lot of different interests.
    Remember, each nation at the Security Council has got its own domestic
    issues to deal with, as well, and so it is--I wish things happened
    quicker in the diplomatic realm--sometimes it takes a while to get
    things done. But what the American people need to know is, we've got a
    strategy--a strategy for freedom in the Middle East which protects the
    American people in the long run. And we've got a strategy to deal with
    the situations that arise in the Middle East--first Lebanon; of course,
    the Iranian nuclear weapon issue.
        And, as you remember, right before the G-8, the question on your
    mind was, would we ever get a resolution out of the U.N. on the
    Iranians' desire to have a nuclear weapon, as well as whether or not
    we'd ever get a resolution out of the U.N. to deal with North Korea? As
    a matter of fact, there was great skepticism, I felt, in some circles as
    to whether or not we'd be able to put a diplomacy in place that would
    deal with these two very difficult problems.
        And, in fact, during the G-8, two resolutions were passed--by the
    way, those resolutions overshadowed by the situation in Lebanon. And I'm
    confident that working with our friends, if we stay on principle and
    remind people of the stakes, that we'll be able to accomplish the
    diplomatic objectives that we have set out, which is dealing with this
    problem and addressing the long-term issues.
        A couple more questions, and we'll get out--Suzanne [Suzanne
    Malveaux, Cable News Network].

    Spread of Democracy/Situation in the Middle East

        Q. If I could follow Nedra's question. She had asked, Lebanon----
        The President. I can't remember that far back. [Laughter]
        Q. Lebanon's Parliament Speaker, Nabih Berri, who has been
    negotiating for Hizballah, has rejected the first resolution, saying
    it's unacceptable. They want the Israeli troops to pull out immediately.
    Is that a negotiable point? And also, Secretary Rice, will you be
    reaching out to Berri, as you had spoken with him before?
        The President. Whatever happens in the U.N., we must not create a
    vacuum into which Hizballah and its sponsors are able to move more
    weapons. Sometimes the world likes to take the easy route in order to
    solve a problem. Our view is, it's time to address root causes of
    problems. And to create a vacuum, Suzanne, is unacceptable. It would
    mean that we haven't addressed the root cause.
        The idea is to have the Lebanese Government move into the south so
    that the Government of Lebanon can protect its own territory and that
    there be an international force to provide the help necessary for the
    Lebanese Government to secure its country. Remember, in Germany, the
    first thing I said was--or one of the first things I said--I think I
    said this--help me out here, if I didn't----
        Secretary Rice. I think you did.
        The President. ----was we want the Siniora
    Government to survive and to be strengthened. The linchpin of the policy
    is to support democracies. And so the strategy at the U.N., the
    diplomatic strategy is to support that notion because a democracy in
    Lebanon will not only help that nation address its long-term issues--
    such as rebuilding and providing a hopeful life--but a democracy on
    Israel's northern border will stabilize--help stabilize the region. We
    are committed to a democracy in the Palestinian Territory.

    [[Page 1500]]

        President Abbas, in his
    conversations with Condi, talked about moving forward with democracy.
    There are people who can't stand the thought of a society based upon
    universal liberty from emerging. And that in itself ought to be a
    warning signal to those of us who care deeply for peace, that people
    would be willing to kill innocent citizens in order to stop the advance
    of liberty.
        Now, I've talked a lot about the universal appeal of liberty, and I
    readily concede some people aren't willing to--some say, well, you know,
    liberty may not be universal in this sense--America imposes its will. We
    don't impose liberty; liberty is universal.
        It's one of the interesting debates of the 21st century, I think,
    that some would be willing to say it's okay for people not to live in a
    free society. It's not okay for us. If you love peace, in order to
    achieve peace, you must help people realize that which is universal, and
    that is freedom.
        She asked you a question.
        Secretary Rice. Our point of contact for the Lebanese Government is
    obviously Prime Minister Siniora. As you know, I've also spoken to
    Speaker Berri on a couple of occasions.
        I understand how emotional this is for the Lebanese. They've been
    through a very difficult war. It's emotional for Israel as well. They're
    in the midst of a difficult war.
        Let me just say that in terms of what the end state will look like
    here, I don't think there is any disagreement that the right solution is
    the one that the President referred to. It's the Lebanese and the
    Lebanese Armed Forces able to secure their territory. And the
    international help is so that Lebanon can secure its territory. And I
    don't believe anybody anticipates that there should be foreign forces on
    Lebanese soil as a result of what has happened here.
        And so I think there is room on this issue to work on this issue,
    because everybody has the same vision--that it's the Lebanese Army, with
    support from an international force, that can actually prevent that
    vacuum from obtaining again in the south, so that we're not right back
    here 3 or 4 or 5 months from now, in the same situation.

    President Fidel Castro Ruz of Cuba

        Q. Mr. President, I don't think we've heard from you since Fidel
    Castro has fallen ill. Can you give us what you know of his current
    condition, what your administration's contingency plans are for his
    death, and how they address the desire of Cuban exiles in this country
    to eventually go home and reclaim their property?
        The President. First of all, Cuba is not a very transparent society,
    so the only thing I know is what has been speculated. And that is that,
    on the one hand, he's very ill, and on the other hand, he's going to be
    coming out of a hospital. I don't know. I really don't know.
        And secondly, that our desire is for the Cuban people to be able to
    choose their own form of government, and we would hope that--and we'll
    make this very clear--that as Cuba has the possibility of transforming
    itself from a tyrannical situation to a different type of society, the
    Cuban people ought to decide. The people on the island of Cuba ought to
    decide. And once the people of Cuba decide their form of government,
    then Cuban Americans can take an interest in that country and redress
    the issues of property confiscation. But first things first, and that
    is, the Cuban people need to decide the future of their country.

    Progress in Iraq

        Q. Mr. President, if I could turn to Iraq for a moment.
        The President. Sure.
        Q. When you and Prime Minister Blair met at the White House a few
    months ago, you were asked about mistakes and missteps. And he said the
    one mistake he made was miscalculating in thinking that a young
    democracy, as you put it, would

    [[Page 1501]]

    be born very quickly after the fall of Saddam. Are you prepared today to
    agree with him and acknowledge that you've had the same expectations,
    which were wrong?
        The President. Actually, I think--I can't remember his answer; I'm sure you've characterized it perfectly. My
    attitude is that a young democracy has been born quite quickly. And I
    think the Iraqi Government has shown remarkable progress on the
    political front, and that is, is that they developed a modern
    constitution that was ratified by the people, and then 12 million people
    voted for a government--which gives me confidence about the future in
    Iraq, by the way.
        You know, I hear people say, ``Well, civil war this, civil war
    that.'' The Iraqi people decided against civil war when they went to the
    ballot box, and a unity government is working to respond to the will of
    the people. And frankly, it's quite a remarkable achievement on the
    political front, and the security front is where there have been
    troubles. And it's going to be up to the Maliki Government, with U.S. help, to use the trained forces and
    eventually a trained police force to take care of those who are trying
    to foment sectarian violence.
        We've made some progress against some of those folks, particularly
    when Mr. Zarqawi met his demise. Remember, Al Qaida is in the country,
    all attempting to stop the advance of democracy. And the blowing up of
    the mosque created an opportunity for those who were trying to foment
    sectarian violence to achieve their objective. But the Iraqi people
    rejected that kind of sectarian violence; the army stood strong.
        No question, it's still difficult. On the other hand, the political
    process is part of helping to achieve our objective, which is a free
    country, an ally in the war on terror that can sustain itself and govern
    itself and defend itself.
        Okay, who else? I don't want to hurt any feelings. Yes, sir.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559/War on Terror

        Q. Thank you very much.
        The President. Identify yourself.
        Q. Kevin Corke, NBC News, sir.
        The President. Right. I knew that.
        Q. Yes, sir.
        The President. Just wanted to make sure you did.
        Q. Yes, indeed. In reading the 1559 resolution and the draft as it's
    currently constructed, there are a lot of similarities, quite frankly.
    And I'm wondering if you could speak to, maybe, the frustration some
    Americans might be feeling that you've said we want sustainable peace;
    we don't want to come back here in a few months or a few years, and yet
    it seems like there will be another resolution, maybe another
    resolution, maybe another this, that, and the other. People get
    frustrated. Can you understand that and respond to that, sir?
        The President. Well, the people who should get really frustrated are
    the Israelis and the Lebanese. They ought to be the ones who are
    frustrated, because 1559 clearly laid a way forward for there to be a
    strong democracy in Lebanon, which will more likely yield the peace. And
    there is a level of frustration around the world with organizations that
    will take innocent life to achieve political objectives. And our job is
    to remind people that this isn't a moment; this is a movement, and that
    we must deal with this movement. We must deal with this movement with
    strong security measures; we must bring justice to those who would
    attack us, and at the same time, defeat their ideology by the spread of
    liberty.
        And it takes a lot of work. This is the beginning of a long struggle
    against an ideology that is real and profound. It's Islamo-fascism. It
    comes in different forms. They share the same tactics, which is to
    destroy people and things in order to create chaos in the hopes that
    their vision of the world become predominant in the Middle East.

    [[Page 1502]]

        And Condi and I will work hard--by the way, the United States can't
    win this war alone. We can do damage to the enemy. We can take the
    philosophical high ground and remind people of the importance of how
    freedom can change societies. But we will work with allies and friends
    to achieve this objective. And part of the challenge in the 21st century
    is to remind people about the stakes and remind people that in moments
    of quiet, there's still an Islamic fascist group plotting, planning, and
    trying to spread their ideology. And one of the things that--one of the
    things that came out of this unfortunate incident in the Middle East is,
    it is a stark reminder that there are those who want to stop the advance
    of liberty and destabilize young democracies. And they're willing to
    kill people to do so.
        I repeat, this whole incident started because Hizballah kidnaped two
    soldiers and launched rocket attacks. And it's been unfortunate that
    people on both sides of the border have lost life. And we're committed
    to helping the Lebanese Government rebuild.
        On the other hand, what we won't do is allow for a false hope. We
    believe that it's important to challenge the root cause now. We thought
    we had done so with 1559, but 1559 wasn't implemented. In other words,
    there was a way forward to deal with the problem. And now there's
    another chance to deal with the problem, and that's the role of the
    United States, working with others to not only remind people about the
    problem but to come up with solutions in dealing with the problem. And
    the solutions that we are working with our friends are--in our judgment,
    is the best hope for achieving stability and peace.
        But it takes a lot of work. And it takes commitment and focus. And
    that's what this administration will continue to do. We'll stay focused
    on the problem and stay focused on coming up with solutions that, when
    implemented, will leave behind a better world.
        Thank you all very much for your interest.

    Note: The President's news conference began at 8:59 a.m. at the Bush
    Ranch. In his remarks, he referred to former Secretary of State Colin L.
    Powell; former Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage; President
    Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority; Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
    of Israel; Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier captured and held captive by
    militants in Gaza since June 25; Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev,
    Israeli soldiers captured and held captive by militants in Lebanon since
    July 12; Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom; and Prime
    Minister Nuri al-Maliki of Iraq. Secretary Rice referred to Prime
    Minister Fuad Siniora and Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri of Lebanon;
    and Secretary-General Kofi Annan of the United Nations. A reporter
    referred to Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany.