    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book II)]
    [November 5, 2006]
    [Pages 2019-2027]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at a Nebraska Victory 2006 Rally in Grand Island, Nebraska
    November 5, 2006

        The President. Thank you all very much. Thanks for coming. Thanks
    for inviting me. So Laura says, ``What do you
    think we ought to do on our 29th wedding anniversary?'' I said, ``Why
    don't I go to Grand Island, Nebraska, because there are some people I
    want to thank in advance of what you're going to do on November 7th.''
        I want to thank you for working hard. I want to thank you for
    voting. I want to thank you for sending Adrian Smith and Pete Ricketts to Washington, DC. You'd be happy to hear she agrees. [Laughter] She said, ``You go ahead on; you go
    tell them, I agree with you.'' So she sends her love, and on this, our
    29th anniversary, I'm proud to say, I love her dearly.
        Seems like to me, when you want somebody to represent you in the
    Congress, you need somebody who has lived here their whole life and who
    understands Nebraska values. Seems like to me, if you're from this part
    of the world, you'd better have you somebody who understands what it
    means to be a farmer and a rancher representing you in the United States
    Congress. And that person is Adrian Smith.
        I also appreciate you coming out to support Pete Ricketts. He's a small-business man; he's a successful
    small-business man. Let me tell you, we've got too many lawyers in
    Washington. Send somebody to Washington who has met a payroll, and that
    person is Pete Ricketts for the United States Senate. I appreciate
    Susanne Ricketts for standing with Pete and
    working just as hard as he is.
        I want to thank your Governor, Governor
    Dave Heineman, and his wife, Sally, for being
    with us today. One of these days, he and I are going to be members of
    the ex-Governors club. [Laughter] But I know you're proud of the job
    he's doing. He's setting high standards and working hard to accomplish
    that which he said he would do on the campaign trail.
        I appreciate very much being here with a fine United States Senator,
    a man I call a friend and a person I know you call friend, Chuck
    Hagel. From the First
    Congressional District, Jeff Fortenberry
    and his wife, Celeste, is with us. And
    from the Second Congressional District, Lee Terry
    and his wife, Robyn, have joined us. It's a good
    sign when the Congressmen from neighboring districts are coming in. See,
    they smell a winner. They understand what's about to happen on election
    day.

    [[Page 2020]]

        Proud to be here with your Lieutenant Governor, Sheehy, your attorney general,
    Bruning, and your secretary of state, Gale.
    Thank you all for coming.
        I had an opportunity to say hello to his honor, your
    mayor. Mr. Mayor, thank you for being here. I
    appreciate you coming. I'm honored you're here. My only advice is, pave
    the potholes. [Laughter] Although, Mr. Mayor, if you please, I didn't
    feel any on the way in.
        I want to thank you all. I really do want to thank the grassroots
    activists, the people who worked hard to get these candidates to where
    they are. And I just urge you to keep working for the next 48 hours.
        I know--I'm sure you've heard the same predictions I've heard. The
    prognosticators have already decided the outcome of this election before
    the good people of Nebraska have voted. But don't worry about it; the
    same thing happened in 2004. Some of them up in Washington had already
    picked out their new offices in the West Wing. [Laughter] They listened
    to the prognosticators. Then the people showed up to the polls, and the
    movers were not needed.
        And the same thing is going to happen on November the 7th. You're
    going to elect Adrian Smith; you're going to
    elect Pete Ricketts. We're going
    to hold the House and hold the Senate.
        And there's a reason: Because Republicans understand the values and
    the priorities of the American people. And by the way, we don't shift
    our values and we don't shift our priorities based upon the latest
    opinion poll. We're running on a record. We've raised standards for our
    public schools. No child is going to be left behind in America because
    of our reforms.
        Adrian Smith and I understand, if the farm
    economy is doing well in Nebraska, the entire economy of the United
    States does well. Adrian, Pete,
    and I understand that we've got a problem because we're too dependent on
    foreign oil. And so we passed comprehensive energy legislation that
    encourages new technologies that will enable us to drive our cars as a
    result of crops grown right here in the great State of Nebraska.
        We're taking the lead. I remember when I was campaigning with you, I
    said, ``Vote for me; I will put judges on the bench who strictly
    interpret the law and not legislate from the bench.'' We've got a record
    to run on. I want to thank Senator Chuck Hagel for strongly supporting my nominees to the Federal
    bench, particularly Sam Alito and John
    Roberts. When you go in to vote for
    your United States Senator, just remember you're not only voting for an
    individual, you're voting for the style of judiciary we have.
        And if the Democrats were to control the United States Senate,
    judges like Alito and Roberts would never have been seated on the Supreme
    Court.
        No, we've got a record to run on, and we've got stands we take that
    are totally different from the Democrats. The two big issues in this
    campaign, as far as I'm concerned, is how many--how much tax are you
    going to pay, and whether or not this Government is going to do
    everything in our power to protect you.
        Let me start with taxes. See, our philosophy is this: You can spend
    your money far better than the Federal Government can. I don't care what
    they're telling you in the races here, but the Democrats believe they
    can spend their money better than you can.
        Audience members. Boo!
        The President. Our philosophy says that if you've got more of your
    own money in your pocket to save, spend, or invest, the economy
    benefits.
        We just didn't go to Washington to be philosophers. We went to
    Washington to act. I signed the largest tax cut since Ronald Reagan was
    the President of the United States. We cut the taxes for everybody who
    pays income taxes. We doubled the child

    [[Page 2021]]

    tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut the taxes on the
    small businesses. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to
    encourage investment. And for the sake of our small-business owners and
    for the sake of our ranchers and for the sake of our farmers, we put the
    death tax on the road to extinction.
        I don't know if you can remember that far back about the debate on
    taxes, but I can. Democrats in Washington predicted the tax cuts would
    not create jobs; they predicted the tax cuts would not increase wages;
    and they predicted that tax cuts would cause the Federal deficit to
    explode. That's what they predicted. Now the facts are in. The tax cuts
    we passed have led to a strong and growing economy. Last Friday, we had
    more good news about our economy. The national unemployment rate is down
    to 4.4 percent. Real wages rose 2.4 percent over the past year, and we
    cut the deficit in half 3 years ahead of schedule. The tax cuts we
    passed are working.
        And the Democrats are going to raise your taxes.
        Audience members. Boo!
        The President. Oh, they're not going to tell you that. They won't
    admit it quite that bluntly. As a matter of fact, they really don't want
    you to know what they think. They asked the Democrat leader in the
    House recently about tax cuts and she said,
    speaking about the Democrats, ``We love tax cuts.'' Well, given her
    record, she must be a secret admirer. [Laughter]
        She and her party voted against reducing
    the marriage penalty, voted against cutting taxes on small businesses,
    voted against lowering taxes for families with children, voted against
    putting the death tax on the road to extinction. If this is their
    definition of love, I'd sure hate to see hate.
        See, here's the way the tax cuts work: If they are not extended or
    made permanent, your taxes are going up. See, if the Congress doesn't
    act to say, we're going to extend the tax cuts, or we're just going to
    make the tax cuts permanent, then you get to pay an increased tax. They
    asked the man who aspires to be the head
    of the Ways and Means Committee in the House of Representatives--that's
    the tax writing committee--they said, ``Can you think of any of the tax
    cuts that were passed that you would extend?'' He said, ``I can't think
    of a one.'' In other words, that's the Democrats' view of extending your
    tax cuts. This election is important because it determines the size of
    your taxes.
        I'm going to give you an example of what I'm talking about. Right
    now the child tax credit is up to $1,000. But if those tax cuts are not
    expired, it goes down to $500 a child. So when you're sitting around the
    dinner table tonight, count heads. [Laughter] Any of you got four
    children? Right here, here you go, okay. I'm going to use you all as an
    example. So you're at dinner, number one child, two children, three,
    four, multiply by 500; means that if the Democrats take control of the
    House of Representatives, you get yourself a $2,000 tax increase.
        Audience members. Boo!
        The President. Now, that may not sound like a lot to people in
    Washington, but it sounds like a lot to me. It sounds like a lot to
    Adrian Smith, and it sounds like a lot to Pete
    Ricketts. That's why we're going
    to keep your taxes low.
        On these issues, the Democrat party has adopted a clear strategy of
    opposition and obstruction. Recently the House Democrat leader explained the advice she's been following since I was
    reelected in 2004. She said, ``You must take him down.'' That him would
    be me. One newspaper described her approach as scorched-earth strategy,
    for refusing to negotiate with the GOP. Now I want you to think about
    that. Think about that kind of vision. It's a sad commentary on the
    Democrat party that its leaders have resorted to knee-jerk opposition as
    their guiding principle.
        You know if you're wondering what--where the Democrats stand on a
    major

    [[Page 2022]]

    issue, there's an easy formula to figure it out: No matter what the
    issue, if the Republicans are for it, they're against it. [Laughter]
        When we proposed tax relief for everybody who pays income taxes, the
    Democrats opposed it. When Republicans proposed an energy policy, an
    energy bill to make our Nation less dependent on foreign oil, the
    Democrats opposed it. When Republicans proposed association health plans
    to help small businesses get coverage, insurance coverage at the same
    discounts big companies get, Democrats opposed it. When Republicans
    proposed medical liability reform so our docs aren't run out of practice
    and your costs aren't run up, the Democrats opposed it.
        And here's the way I see it: If the Democrats are so good about
    being the party of the opposition, let's just keep them in the
    opposition. And the best way is to send Adrian Smith to the United States Congress and Pete
    Ricketts to the Senate.
        This election is taking place in an historic time for our country.
    And when our children and grandchildren look back on this period, one
    question will overwhelm all the rest: Did we do everything in our power
    to fight and win the war on terror? We face an enemy--[applause]. I wish
    I could report to you we weren't at war. Nobody wants to be at war. But
    the truth is, we face a brutal enemy that still desires to harm America.
    Many of our citizens say, ``Why is that?''
        Well, this enemy has an ideology. They believe the exact opposite of
    what we believe. We believe in basic, universal freedoms. We believe
    people ought to worship the way they see fit. We believe people ought to
    be able to express themselves. We believe in public dissent; they don't.
    They also have a vision to spread their ideology as far corners--to the
    far corners of the world, and we stand in their way. You can't negotiate
    with them. You can't hope for the best with them. Our most important job
    is to protect you, and the best way to do so is to stay on the offense
    and bring them to justice before they hurt us again.
        The strategy is to stay on the offense, and the strategy is to
    protect you here at home. We have to be right 100 percent of the time,
    and the enemy has to be right one time. And therefore, I reviewed all
    the procedures to make sure our professionals have what it takes to
    protect you. There is a wall--there was a wall that prevented our
    intelligence folks from sharing vital information with our law
    enforcement folks. I can't tell you why that happened; it just did; and
    it didn't make any sense in this new kind of war. If our job is to
    protect you, we better make sure the intelligence our people gathers is
    passed on to the people whose job it is to prevent the attacks here in
    the homeland.
        And so I asked the Congress to pass the PATRIOT Act. The PATRIOT Act
    is a vital piece of legislation that has helped us break up terror cells
    around the United States. It's a piece of legislation that guarded your
    civil liberties. When that important piece of legislation came up for
    renewal, the vast majority of Senate Democrats and House Democrats voted
    against it. Now, they must have a different attitude about this war on
    terror.
        See, my attitude is, you can't respond after we're attacked; you
    must respond before we're attacked. In this new kind of war, we'd better
    understand what the enemy is thinking. And so I talked to the--our phone
    boys, and I said, ``If they're calling in, if Al Qaida is making a phone
    call from outside the United States to inside, or if somebody affiliated
    with the enemy is making a phone call from outside to inside, we better
    understand why.'' We need to know what they're thinking and what they're
    planning in order to protect you.
        When the terrorist surveillance program came up for votes in the
    United States House of Representatives, by far the vast majority of
    Democrats voted against that legislation. They just see the world
    differently. When you're getting ready to go

    [[Page 2023]]

    into the ballot box, remember the attitudes of the folks in Washington,
    DC, about what it takes to protect you. We're picking up people off the
    battlefield, and we better know what they're thinking.
        I'm going to give you a short story here. We found a man named
    Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. Our
    intelligence people think he was the mastermind of the September the
    11th attacks. So I authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to find
    out what he knew. See, if he knew about one attack, he might know
    something about another attack. Our job is to protect you. When the
    authority for these CIA interrogators to continue their program came up
    in front of the House and the Senate, the vast majority of Democrats in
    both bodies voted against that legislation.
        We need people like Adrian Smith and Pete
    Ricketts in the House and the
    Senate who understand our professionals need to be given the tools
    necessary to protect you. We are on the offense, and we're going to stay
    on the offense. It is hard to plot and plan against America when you're
    on the run. It is hard to plot and plan--America when you're hiding.
        I want you to know--let me share a lesson about September the 11th
    that's important. When we see a threat overseas, we've got to take the
    threat seriously. It's important for our fellow citizens never to forget
    that lesson. The days are gone when you see a threat and just hope for
    the best. When we see threats, we must deal with them.
        Saddam Hussein was a threat. I saw him as
    a threat; members of both political parties saw the threat; the United
    Nations saw the threat. My decision to remove Saddam Hussein was the
    right decision, and the world is better off for it.
        And today we witnessed a landmark event in the history of Iraq.
    Saddam Hussein was convicted and sentenced to
    death by the Iraqi High Tribunal. Saddam Hussein trial is a milestone in
    the Iraqi people's efforts to replace the rule of a tyrant with the rule
    of law, and it's a major achievement for this young democracy. America
    congratulates the Iraqi people, and we give our thanks to the men and
    women of America's Armed Forces, who have--[applause]. Without their
    courage and skill, today's verdict never would have happened. And we are
    grateful for their sacrifice and service.
        We are in a global war, and it's a war being fought on a variety of
    fronts. And the central front is Iraq. Oh, I've heard all the talk out
    of Washington. You probably have too. ``Iraq is a distraction in the war
    on terror,'' they say. Well, I don't believe that. Our troops don't
    believe that. And Usama bin Laden doesn't
    believe that. Listen to his words: He calls Iraq the third world war. He
    says victory for the terrorists in Iraq will mean America's defeat and
    disgrace forever.
        Now I want you to listen to the words of a senior Member of the
    House of Representatives from the Democrat
    Party. The reason I'm talking about this is the people of this district
    have got to understand, there is a different mentality in Washington
    than what you're used to. She said, ``The President says that fighting
    them there makes it less likely we will have to fight them here.''
    That's exactly what I say, and it's exactly what I believe. She went on
    to say, ``The opposite is true. Because we are fighting them there, it
    may become more likely we will have to fight them here.''
        Iraq is not the reason why these extremists and terrorists are at
    war with us. We were not in Iraq when they bombed the World Trade Center
    in 1993. We were not in Iraq when they bombed the Embassies in Tanzania
    and in Kenya. We were not in Iraq when they attacked the USS Cole, and
    we were not in Iraq on September the 11th, 2001. You don't create
    terrorists by fighting the terrorists. The best way to protect you is to
    stay on the offense and defeat them overseas so we do not have to face
    them here at home.

    [[Page 2024]]

        And we got one goal in Iraq, and that is victory. There's a country
    that--we're working for a country that can sustain itself and govern
    itself and defend itself and be an ally in the war on terror, to be an
    ally in this struggle against extremists who want to defy the hopes of
    reasonable people around the Middle East, these extremists who want to
    come and attack America again. And it's a tough fight, no question about
    it. I understand how tough it is, and so do our troops, and so do the
    families of our troops.
        It's tough because we face an enemy that is willing to kill innocent
    life to achieve their objectives. They have no conscience, and they
    understand that these violent acts will end up on our television
    screens. And they believe the United States does not have the stomach
    for the long fight. But what they don't understand about this
    administration and a huge number of Americans, we're not going to run
    from thugs and assassins.
        Our goal is solid. Our tactics constantly change. I'm in touch with
    our commanders all the time. I tell them, ``Whatever you need to win,
    you'll have.'' We give them the flexibility necessary to continue to
    adjust their tactics to meet the changes the enemy are doing on the
    ground. And we got a lot going for us. We got a strategy for victory
    that will work, and we got a fantastic group of young men and women who
    have volunteered to defend you in the United States military.
        And whether my fellow citizens agree with my decisions or not, one
    thing they owe is they owe those who wear the uniform the utmost
    respect. And those of us at the Federal Government owe them all they
    need, all the support to make sure they can do the jobs that I've asked
    them to do.
        And I thank Senator Hagel for
    his strong support. I thank the Members of Congress who are here for
    their strong support of the United States military, and there's no doubt
    in my mind Pete Ricketts and
    Adrian Smith will be strong supporters of the
    men and women in the United States military.
        We have something else going for us, and those are brave Iraqis.
    Iraqi citizens have suffered unspeakable violence, yet they are
    committed to a government of and by and for the people. Our strategy is
    to help their politics move forward. Our strategy is to help their
    economy improve. And our strategy is to train Iraqis so they can take
    the fight to the few who want to dash the hopes of the many.
        You know, when nearly 12 million Iraqis voted, I was pleased, but I
    was not surprised, and I'll tell you why I wasn't surprised. I believe
    there is an Almighty. I believe a great gift of the Almighty to every
    man, woman, and child on Earth is the desire to be free. And so when the
    Iraqis said, ``We want to be free,'' it is part of my belief in the
    universality of freedom.
        We have a strategy for victory, and the only way we won't achieve it
    is if we leave before the job is done. If you listen to this debate on
    Iraq, if you think about the Democrats' plans for success, there isn't
    one. This is a vital issue facing our country. This is a central front
    in the war on terror, and yet they have no plan for victory.
        Oh, some of them are saying we ought to pull out now. Others are
    saying we ought to pull out at a fixed date, before the job is done.
    Actually, one of the Members of the House of Representatives, a
    distinguished Member, said the best way to handle the situation is to
    remove our troops to an island 5,000 miles away. I'm not kidding you.
    That's not a plan for victory. Nineteen House Members introduced
    legislation that would cut off the funds for our troops. One Democrat
    Senator, one of Chuck's colleagues, she said, ``We haven't coalesced
    around a single plan, but we're in general agreement on basic
    principles.'' Think about that. Yes, they're in agreement on principles:
    Get out before the job is done.

    [[Page 2025]]

        They've taken a calculated risk. By the way, I'm not saying these
    folks are unpatriotic; I'm saying they're wrong. You can't win a war and
    protect the homeland if you're unwilling to fight the war. You know, the
    Democrats have taken a calculated gamble in this campaign. They think
    the only way they can win is to criticize and not offer a plan of their
    own. You know, let me say this to you: Anger is not a plan; criticism is
    not a plan; pessimism is not a plan. This country needs people who
    understand the stakes and are willing to support the fight to protect
    you.
        Retreat from Iraq before the job is done would embolden the enemy
    and would make this country less secure. It's very important for our
    fellow citizens to understand this is a different kind of war, and if
    the United States were to leave before the job is done, the enemy would
    follow us here. Leaving before the job was done would make it easier for
    these extremists to recruit. Leaving before the job was done would dash
    the hopes of the millions upon millions of people who want to live a
    peaceful life in the Middle East. And leaving before the job is done
    would dishonor the sacrifice of the men and women who have worn the
    uniform of the United States.
        And leaving before the job is done would be felt for generations to
    come. And let me explain to you why. The enemy has made it clear, they
    expect us to leave when the fighting stays tough because, one, they want
    a safe haven from which to launch further attacks on the United States,
    a safe haven similar to the safe haven they had in Afghanistan, where
    they trained thousands of people and where they planned and plotted to
    launch their attacks that killed nearly 3,000 of our citizens.
        They have said that they want to establish a caliphate--a governing
    organization based upon their ideology--and it starts with toppling
    modern governments. They would like to get ahold of oil resources so
    they could then say to the West, ``Abandon your alliance with Israel,''
    or, ``Withdraw from the Middle East; otherwise, you're going to be
    facing high priced oil, and we'll bring your economy down.'' And when
    you put all in the mix a country which doesn't like us with a nuclear
    weapon, 30 years from now, people are going to look back at this period
    in our history and say, ``What happened to them in 2006? Could they not
    see the impending danger? Were they unable to see the threats to a
    generation of Americans?''
        Well, let me assure you, I see the danger. I clearly see the stakes.
    That is why we will support our troops. That is why we will fight in
    Iraq, and that is why we'll win in Iraq.
        I would like to share a story with you. I share this story all
    around the country, so if you've heard it, I apologize. It's a story
    about the power of liberty. It's a story about then-sitting Prime
    Minister of Japan, Koizumi, and me and
    Laura heading down to Elvis's place in Memphis,
    Tennessee. They said, ``Why did you go down there?'' Well, I hadn't been
    down there. I thought it would be fun to go.
        Koizumi, Prime Minister Koizumi wanted
    to go because he loved Elvis. He was a fan of Elvis Presley. But also, I
    wanted to tell a story. It's the story about--I'm sure your relatives,
    just like my relative, my dad, volunteered
    to fight the Japanese after the attacks of Pearl Harbor. That's when the
    story begins. They attacked us. Thousands of our fellow citizens said,
    ``I want to go, and I want to fight for our freedoms against an enemy
    which has attacked us.'' By the way, it's the same spirit today, around,
    where people have said, ``I want to volunteer to defend America.''
        My dad went. Your relatives went. They
    fought like mad. Japan was the sworn enemy of the United States. I'm now
    on the airplane, Air Force One, flying down to Elvis's place, and I was
    talking about keeping the peace with the Prime Minister of
    Japan. We talked about how we got to work
    together to convince the North

    [[Page 2026]]

    Korean to give up his nuclear weapons ambitions.
    We talked about the fact that Iraq has 1,000 troops--I mean Japan had
    1,000 troops in Iraq.
        He understands what I know: In this
    ideological struggle of extremists versus rational, reasonable people
    who want to live in peace, when we find young democracies, we must
    support them for the sake of peace. We talked about how to whom much is
    given, much is required, and that we'll continue to take the lead in
    trying to eradicate the pandemic of HIV/AIDS in places like Africa. We
    talked about our responsibilities as friends and allies.
        I find it amazing that my dad and your
    relatives fought the Japanese, and today--then his son was talking about
    keeping the peace. Something happened, and what happened was, Japan
    adopted a Japanese-style democracy. The lesson for all to hear is,
    liberty has got the capacity to transform an enemy into an ally. Liberty
    has got the capacity to transform a region of hate and resentment into a
    region of hope.
        Someday American Presidents will be sitting down with duly elected
    leaders in the Middle East talking about keeping the peace, and a
    generation of Americans will be better off for it.
        In 48 hours, you're going to be walking into the booth, and so will
    millions of citizens around our country, and people will be given a
    choice between two political parties with different philosophies. If you
    think your health care decisions should remain in the hands of
    bureaucrats, then you ought to vote for the Democrats. If you think that
    you and your doctors should control your healthcare decisions, vote
    Republican.
        If you think that trial lawyers should be allowed to continue
    driving good doctors out of practice and running up your costs of
    medicine, you go ahead and vote Democrat. But if you believe that we
    should trade in the trial lawyers and protect our physicians from
    frivolous lawsuits, vote Republican.
        If you think activist judges should be allowed to redefine our
    country and issue new laws from the bench, you need to go vote Democrat.
    If you believe the role of the judge is to strictly interpret our
    Constitution and laws and leave legislating to legislators, vote
    Republican.
        If you think Medicare was serving our seniors just fine and didn't
    need to be reformed, vote Democrat. But if you believe we were right to
    expand choices for our seniors and provide better access for affordable
    prescription drugs, vote Republican.
        If you think our farmers and ranchers ought to pay taxes while
    they're alive and then pay taxes after they're dead, you vote Democrat.
    But if you think that the death tax is punitive and we need to get rid
    of it, you vote Republican.
        If you think you can afford more taxes, vote Democrat. But if you
    want our taxes low and if you want people who believe you can spend your
    money better than the Government can, you vote Republican.
        And if you think the way to protect this country and win the war on
    terror is to criticize your opponents and offer no plan for victory, you
    vote for the Democrats. But if you believe the way to win this war is to
    stay on the offense and use every element of national power to protect
    you and lay the foundation of peace for a generation, vote Republican.
        So I appreciate your coming. Thanks for giving me a chance to share
    something that's on my mind. I'm now asking you when you go forth to
    find fellow Republicans and say, you've got a responsibility to vote.
    But while you're doing it, don't overlook discerning Democrats and
    openminded independents. Tell them to go to the polls. Tell them to vote
    for Adrian Smith and Pete Ricketts, and the United States will be better off for
    it.
        God Bless, and God bless America.

    Note: The President spoke at 3:58 p.m. at the Heartland Events Center.
    In his remarks, he referred to Lt. Gov. Rick Sheehy, attorney

    [[Page 2027]]

    general Jon Bruning, secretary of state John A. Gale of Nebraska; Mayor
    Jay Vavricek of Grand Island, NE; former President Saddam Hussein of
    Iraq; Usama bin Laden, leader of the Al Qaida terrorist organization;
    and Chairman Kim Jong Il of North Korea.