    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book I)]
    [January 4, 2006]
    [Pages 4-8]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks Following a Meeting on the War on Terror in Arlington, Virginia
    January 4, 2006

        Today our Nation mourns those who lost their lives in the mining
    accident in West Virginia. We send our prayers and heartfelt condolences
    to the loved ones whose hearts are broken. We ask that the good Lord
    comfort them in their time of need.
        I want to thank the Governor of West Virginia for showing such compassion, and I want to thank those
    who risked their lives to save those miners for showing such courage.
    May God bless the good people of West Virginia.
        I just finished an important meeting, a briefing with members of my
    national security team, a briefing hosted by Secretary Don
    Rumsfeld and General Pete Pace. We spent time talking about this war on terror, the
    global war on terror. And to make sure that my team understood the
    progress we've made and the challenges ahead, the Secretary asked three
    of our commanders to join in the briefing, Generals Abizaid, Casey, and General
    Dempsey.
        I want to tell the American people that I am most impressed by the
    caliber of these generals. They are smart. They are capable. They are
    visionary, and they're working hard to win this global war. We also were
    able to speak to one of our fine Ambassadors, Ambassador
    Khalilzad from Baghdad, as well.
        During our briefing, we talked about the areas of concern in this
    global war on terror, recognizing that the enemy, which has an ideology
    of hate and a desire to kill, lurks in parts around the world. I assured
    those generals that this administration would do everything in our power
    to bring these enemies to justice.
        We also spent time talking about the two major fronts in this war on
    terror, and that would be Iraq and Afghanistan. In Iraq, 2005 was a year
    of progress toward meeting our goal of victory. If you really think
    about it, there was three important elections that took place and in an
    atmosphere that some predicted wouldn't yield democracy. We had the
    January elections; we had the Constitution elections; we had elections
    last December when nearly 11 million people defied the terrorists to
    vote. The turnout in that country was 70 percent. Part of

    [[Page 5]]

    our strategy for defeating the enemy in Iraq is for there to be a viable
    political process. And when 70 percent of the people show up to vote,
    that's a good sign. See, people are saying, ``I want to participate in
    the democratic process.'' The Iraqis showed great courage.
        Now, we look forward to the process, obviously, moving on. The
    formation of a unity government is going to be important to the
    stability of the future of Iraq. Before that happens, obviously, you've
    got to finish counting the votes. And that's going to happen over the
    next couple of weeks. And then the Government--well, they're beginning
    to form the Government under their new Constitution. It takes a two-
    third vote of the Parliament for certain top officials to assume office.
    And to form this inclusive government, the Iraqi leaders must compromise
    and negotiate and build consensus, and this is going to take some time.
        What the American people will see during the weeks ahead is a
    political process unfold, that people will be making decisions not based
    upon who's got the biggest gun but who's got the capacity to rally the
    will of the people. And that's positive. Democracies are an important
    part of our winning the war on terror. Democracies yield an ideology
    that is based on an ideology that says people are free--free to choose.
    The ideology of the enemy says a few people will choose, and if you
    don't like what we tell you to believe in, we'll kill you or treat you
    harshly.
        And I want the American people to remember what life was like for
    the poor people in Afghanistan under the Taliban. The Taliban had no
    hopeful vision. They're vision was, if you don't agree with us, we'll
    take you in the public square and whip you. They're vision was, women
    don't have rights. They're vision was a dark and dim vision, which
    stands in stark contrast to the vision based upon freedom and democracy.
        The second part of our strategy is to--in Iraq, a strategy for
    victory, is to train the Iraqis so they can take the fight against the
    few who would stop the progress of many. And during this election, we
    were briefed about the security forces during the election. The
    commanders talked about more than 215,000 Iraqi soldiers and police that
    secured the country. That was an increase, by the way, of 85,000 since
    January of 2005. General Casey labeled
    the performance of the troops as superb.
        Before the elections, there was a number of joint operations to lay
    the groundwork for a peaceful election. The Iraqis were in the lead on
    election day. In other words, they were responsible for the security of
    the elections. We were in a position to help them, but they were
    responsible for securing the voting booths. And they did a fine job. The
    number of attacks during the election were down dramatically. They
    performed, and that's part of our calibrating whether or not the Iraqi
    troops are becoming more capable. Numbers are one thing, but the ability
    to perform is another. And during these elections, the Iraqi troops
    showed our commanders on the ground and showed the American people that
    they're becoming more and more capable of performing their duty to
    provide security to the Iraqi people.
        Now, you've got to understand that just because the elections went
    forward that doesn't mean these Saddamists, Zarqawi types, are going to lay down their arms. They're not.
    There will still be violence, and there will still be some who believe
    that they can affect the political outcome of Iraq through violent
    means. We understand that. And we're going to stay on the offense
    against these--``we'' being coalition forces as well as the Iraqi
    forces. But the recent elections have served as a real defeat for the
    rejectionists and the Saddamists and Al Qaida types. Sunni Arabs who had
    boycotted the process joined the process. And as they did so, those who
    want to stop the progress of freedom are becoming more and more
    marginalized inside of Iraq.
        So in 2006, the mission is to continue to hand over more and more
    territory and

    [[Page 6]]

    more and more responsibility to Iraqi forces. A year ago, there was only
    a handful of Iraqi Army and police battalions ready for combat, ready to
    take the lead. Today, there are more than 125 Iraqi combat battalions
    fighting the enemy, and 50 of those are in the lead. That's progress.
    And it's important progress, and it's an important part of our strategy
    to win in Iraq. And as these forces become more battle-hardened and take
    the lead, we're going to see continued confidence in the Iraqi people of
    the Iraqis being able to defend themselves, and that's important. And as
    we see more of these Iraqi forces in the lead, we'll be able to continue
    with our desire, our stated strategy that says, as Iraqis stand up,
    we'll stand down.
        The commanders have recently determined that we can reduce our
    combat forces in Iraq from 17 to 15 brigades. And the reason they were
    able to do so is because the Iraqis are more capable. The adjustment is
    underway. This adjustment will result in a net decrease of several
    thousand troops below the pre-election baseline of 138,000 U.S. troops
    in Iraq. The decrease comes in addition to the reduction of about 20,000
    troops who were in Iraq to assist with security during the December
    elections.
        Later this year, if Iraqis continue to make progress on the security
    and political sides that we expect, we can discuss further possible
    adjustments with the leaders of a new Government in Iraq. But my
    decisions will be based upon conditions on the ground and the
    recommendation of our commanders, not based by false political
    timetables in Washington, DC. I'm not going to let politics get in the
    way of doing the right thing in Iraq, and the American people have got
    to understand that.
        We've also got the opportunity to change our composition of our
    forces inside Iraq. In 2006, we expect Iraqis will take more and more
    control of the battle space, and as they do so, we will need fewer U.S.
    troops to conduct combat operations around that country. More of our
    forces will be dedicated to training and supporting the Iraqi units. In
    the coming year, we will continue to focus on helping Iraqis improve
    their logistics and intelligence capabilities so more Iraqi units can
    take the fight and can sustain themselves in the fight.
        We're also going to spend a lot of time on police training. An
    important part of our strategy is not only to have a competent Iraqi
    Army but police forces that are capable of earning the confidence of the
    Iraqi citizens. To restore security, Iraq has got to have capable police
    forces. And the recent reports of abuses by some of the Iraqi police
    units are troubling, and that conduct is unacceptable. Our commanders
    understand that; the Secretary understands that; and I know that.
        To stop such abuses and increase the professionalism of the Iraqi
    police, General Dempsey, who's in charge
    of training, and others are working with the Iraqis to continue making
    adjustments in the way the forces are trained. First, we're going to
    work with the Iraqi Government to increase the training Iraqi police
    recruits receive in human rights and the rule of law, so they understand
    the role of the police in a democratic society.
        Second, we're training Iraqi police with a program that has been
    effective with the Iraqi Army. In other words, when we find something
    that works, we'll do it. And if we find something that's not working, we
    change; and that is to embed coalition transition teams inside Iraqi
    special police units. Embedding our folks inside Iraqi Army units has
    worked. One reason why these Iraqi units are better able to take the
    lead is because they've worked side by side with American specialists
    and experts, some of our best troops. And so, we're going to embed these
    type of soldiers with the Iraqi police forces as well.
        These transition teams will be made up of our officers, as well as
    noncommissioned officers. The coalition teams will go in the

    [[Page 7]]

    field with the police. They'll provide real-time advice and important
    assistance on patrol and during operations. And between operations,
    they're going to train the Iraqi officers; they're going to help them
    become increasingly capable and professional so they can serve and
    protect all the Iraqi people without discrimination.
        As we train not only the soldiers but the police, our special units
    will continue hunting down Al Qaida and their affiliates. See, Al Qaida
    thinks they can use Iraq as a safe haven from which to launch attacks.
    That's their stated objective. I'm not making this up. Nobody in the--
    this is what Zawahiri and
    Zarqawi discussed. They said, ``Let's
    drive America out of Iraq so we can use Iraq as a safe haven.'' We're
    going to train Iraqis. We'll train their army and train their police,
    and at the same time, we've got some of the finest soldiers ever on the
    hunt to bring Zarqawi and his buddies to justice.
        The second front is in Afghanistan. The second major front in this
    global war against these terrorists is in Afghanistan, where we've made
    steady progress on the road to democracy. President Karzai got elected. There's a sitting Parliament. I mean, it's
    amazing how far Afghanistan has come from the days of the Taliban.
    General Abizaid told us in our briefing that
    new democracy is being increasingly defended by a capable Afghan Army
    and police. The Afghan National Army is now nearly 27,000 soldiers who
    are trained and equipped. General Abizaid tells us these soldiers are
    tough in battle. They want to defend their homeland. There are some
    55,000 Afghan police officers on the beat. They're taking the fight to
    the enemy. They're working side by side with coalition forces to protect
    this new democracy.
        They're receiving a lot of international support through the NATO
    Alliance. The NATO-led international security assistance force has now
    about 9,000 troops in the country that represents all 26 NATO Allies and
    10 non-NATO nations. In other words, the international community is
    stepping up. Like they have in Iraq, they're stepping up in Afghanistan
    as well. In 2006, the force levels will increase by up to another 6,000
    forces, to a total of approximately 15,000 personnel. In other words,
    you're going to see in 2006 an increase of international force inside of
    Afghanistan.
        As NATO takes on a larger role in Afghanistan and as the capability
    of Afghan forces continues to grow, the United States will reduce force
    levels in Afghanistan from 19,000 to 16,500 this year. In other words,
    our strategy has been to provide a strong commitment to provide
    stability so democracy can flourish. And then as others, including
    Afghan troops as well as NATO troops, step in, we step back. We're going
    to continue to conduct antiterrorist operations in Afghanistan as well.
    This is a part of a global war against the terrorist network.
        I said after September the 11th we would do everything in our power
    to bring justice to the enemy that attacked the American people, and I
    meant it. And part of chasing down the Taliban and Al Qaida is to find
    them where they hide. And just like in Iraq, we're going to have our
    special forces stay on the hunt. And we'll continue training at the same
    time.
        There's a lot of work to be done in this war on terror, but the
    American people can be--rest assured this administration understands the
    task and understands the challenges and understands our obligation to
    protect you, to protect the American people.
        During the past year, we lost some really good folks who wore the
    uniform of the United States of America. We pray for their loved ones.
    We pray for the comfort of those who had a sorrowful holiday season
    because a seat at the table was empty. And we vow to those that we will
    complete our mission: We will lay that foundation of peace for
    generations to come, that we'll do our duty to protect this country by
    not only bringing justice to an enemy that

    [[Page 8]]

    wants to do us harm but by spreading freedom and democracy.
        Thank you very much.

    Note: The President spoke at 11:24 a.m. at the Pentagon. In his remarks,
    he referred to Gov. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia; Gen. John P.
    Abizaid, USA, commander, U.S. Central Command; Gen. George W. Casey,
    Jr., USA, commanding general, Multi-National Force--Iraq; Lt. Gen.
    Martin E. Dempsey, USA, commander, Multi-National Security Transition
    Command--Iraq and NATO Training Mission--Iraq; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq
    Zalmay Khalilzad; senior Al Qaida associate Abu Musab Al Zarqawi; Ayman
    Al-Zawahiri, founder of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and senior Al Qaida
    associate; and President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan. The Office of the
    Press Secretary also released a Spanish language transcript of these
    remarks.