    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2006, Book I)]
    [February 22, 2006]
    [Pages 330-335]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Interview With Indian Journalists
    February 22, 2006

        The President. Quick statement--I'll be glad to answer questions. I
    am really looking forward to my trip. It's the first trip to India for
    me and my wife. We had a great dinner here with
    the Prime Minister. I found him to be a very
    decent, honorable person with whom we established warm relations. And
    he--I just can't tell you how--what a kind person he was and, at the
    same time, represented his great country's interests very well.
        I do want to make something clear in the speech I gave today. I said
    that--as to the Kashmir interest--issue, America supports a solution
    that is acceptable to all sides. As you might recall, in my remarks, I
    said, ``to both sides.'' I would like the record to be so that the world
    hears me say, ``all sides.'' I fully understand that the deal has to be
    acceptable to the Indians, Paks, as well as the citizens of Kashmir.
        Okay?

    India-U.S. Relations

        Q. Yes. Mr. President, how and why has India come front and center
    to U.S. strategic thinking now after being on the margins for so many
    years?
        The President. Well, as you know, there was a history, particularly
    during the cold war, that made it difficult for our countries to
    establish a close relationship. However, things change in the world. And
    as the post-cold war thaw developed, as--attitudes began to shift.
        Secondly, the Indian economy, as a result of more transparency and
    openness and trade, began to change. And as the Indian economy changed,
    it changed the commercial relationship between the United States and
    India.
        Thirdly, there are some common threats that make it in our interests
    to work together--namely terrorism. As I said in my speech today, the
    United States has been attacked, but India certainly understands what it
    means to have suffering as a result of terrorist activities. And so
    there's common interests that have helped to change the relationship.
    And I intend to seize those interests, as does the Prime
    Minister, in order to foster what we've
    called a strategic relationship.

    [[Page 331]]

        And in my speech today, I made it clear to the American people that
    this relationship is in our interests, and I described the various ways
    it was in our interests. I think the evolution of the relationship goes
    to show that the world is--changes, and it's never static. And so thank
    you for the question.

    United Nations Security Council Membership

        Q. Mr. President, if India's credentials are so good, why isn't the
    U.S. backing its candidacy for the U.N. Security Council?
        The President. Well, let me make one other point, if you don't mind,
    that I should have made in my speech today, and that is that there are a
    lot of Indian Americans who made a tremendous contribution to our
    country as well. And there are a lot of--over the last--as the high-tech
    boom helped transform our society, a lot of the brain power behind that
    boom have been Indian Americans, as well as Indians educated here in
    America. And so the American people, as well, have begun to get kind of
    a different perspective on the great contributions that India can not
    only make to our own country but can make to the world.
        Our position on the United Nations Security Council has been very
    clear. First, we support a U.N. Security Council reform, but we think it
    ought to happen after other institutions within the United Nations
    become reformed. What I was always worried about is that we would focus
    on the U.N. Security Council and nothing else would happen. And so we
    have--we have said to all parties concerned--I fully understand the
    Indian position just like other nations--that ``we will take your case
    under consideration, but first things first.''
        And a classic case of the reform I'm talking about is the Human
    Rights Commission. It needed to be reformed. And what I was, again,
    worried about is that we'd miss opportunity while focusing on the U.N.
    Security Council.

    Civilian Nuclear Power Program in India

        Q. Mr. President, when do you intend to take the U.S.-India nuclear
    deal before the Congress and before the Nuclear Supplies Group, which is
    part of the U.S. obligation?
        The President. Yes, it is. As we speak, Nick Burns of the State Department is discussing this vital
    issue with Indian counterparts. We are working through what has been--as
    I said in the speech, a difficult issue for the Indian Government as
    well for the American Government. To change the past, the ways of the
    past, can be difficult at times.
        I appreciate the Prime Minister's courage
    last July of laying out a way forward, which I support. And so first
    things first is to go to India and, hopefully, reach an agreement on
    separation and then bring that agreement back and start selling it to
    the Congress. It's--but we can't bring anything back until we've agreed
    to the agreement. And that's what's happening now. There's a spirit of
    good will and cooperation.
        It's in our country's interest, by the way, to encourage India and
    aid India in its development of a civilian nuclear power program. The
    American people are beginning to see high prices of energy, but so are
    the Indian people. And the reason why is, is that there's growing
    economies--ours, India's, China's--which is adding to global demand for
    energy. And demand is outstripping supply, and then what happens, you
    see price.
        And one way to help deal with price here at home and/or with India
    is to develop alternative ways to power homes and businesses as well as
    automobiles. I was sincere in my speech today when I said that we're
    dedicated to research and development to come up with alternative ways
    to use automobiles and want to share that technologies with other
    nations, particularly

    [[Page 332]]

    a nation like India, which has got huge potential and vast room for
    growth.
        And it's in our mutual interests--I also made it clear that it's in
    our interests that the Indian economy prosper. And it's a very simple
    reason why. One, a prosperous country is one that is--particularly one
    that has shown its capacity to deal with a multiethnic and
    multireligious society--it will give India more opportunity to lead,
    particularly in parts of the world where people need to see how
    democracy can work and function in a proper way.
        And secondly, the American people have got to understand a
    prosperous India is advantageous to our own industries. I mean, we want
    people buying American products. Indians want Americans buying Indian
    products. And that exchange of trade in a free and fair way is
    beneficial for workers and consumers.
        And I said an amazing statistic today--at least I thought it was--
    300 million middle-class citizens in India. That's larger than the
    population of the United States. And so we shouldn't fear relations with
    India--matter of fact, we ought to welcome them and work on ways to
    strengthen them. That's really what the purpose of the trip is.
        Q. Do you consider India to be a responsible nuclear nation?
        The President. I do, particularly when they signed the IAEA
    safeguards, and they have a separation between their military and their
    civilian nuclear parts of their Government.

    Iran

        Q. Mr. President, would the United States have a problem if India
    continued to source oil and gas from Iran?
        The President. I think people are going to have to buy their energy
    where they can get it. On the other hand, I do want to make it clear to
    the Indian people and the Indian Government that an Iran with a nuclear
    weapon will destabilize the world and that those of us who are for peace
    and stability must work in concert. So there's a difference between
    energy supply and working closely to achieve a very important objective.
        And we will discuss this issue carefully with the Prime
    Minister. There is a consensus in the world,
    and that consensus is that an Iranian Government that has declared its--
    has said that Israel shouldn't exist, for example, and if it were to
    have a nuclear weapon, would be a danger to all of us. And I will
    continue to make that point with the Prime Minister.

    A.Q. Khan

        Q. Why has the U.S. not questioned A.Q. Khan, whose activities
    intersect proliferation and terrorism?
        The President. Well, we were the nation that exposed the conspiracy
    to deal with--more than the conspiracy, the activities; let me rephrase
    that--we were the nation that exposed the activities of sharing
    technologies, sensitive technologies, nuclear weapons-related
    technologies. And we, of course, want to know as much about the A.Q.
    Khan network as possible. But had it not been for U.S. intelligence,
    coupled with British intelligence, this network never would have been
    exposed. And the light of day helps understand proliferation.

    Civilian Nuclear Power Program in India

        Q. Mr. President, why does India have to jump through the hoops to
    get a civilian nuclear agreement when its energy requirements are
    similar to China, another big, growing economy?
        The President. There are the nuclear supplier group and the IAEA--in
    other words, the world has signed on to this. We think it's in India's
    interest to do so, as it pertains to its civilian nuclear power
    industry. It will give confidence to people. It will make it easier for
    the United States to work with India. This will be a confidence-building
    measure that we don't believe is an unrealistic request. And we do
    realize there will be separation between the

    [[Page 333]]

    military side and the civilian side. What we're working on is the
    civilian side.

    Spread of Democracy

        Q. Is the U.S. more comfortable dealing with dictators and monarchs?
        The President. Do what now? Do I feel comfortable doing what?
        Q. Dealing with dictators and monarchs?
        The President. Do I feel comfortable dealing with them?
        Q. No, the U.S.
        The President. The U.S. feel comfortable with dealing with
    dictators?
        Q. And monarchs.
        The President. And monarchs? Well, I mean, I've got a great
    relationship with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain. [Laughter] She's a lovely lady and a
    great figure in a country that's an important ally. And of course, that
    monarchy is very supportive of a free and open and democratic system.
        You must take the words that I said in my second Inaugural Address
    very seriously, in that we must end tyranny in the 21st century. It's a
    goal that all of us can work on. India has got a unique role to play. I
    mean, when you really think about troubled spots, these are countries
    many times that are having difficulty dealing with what it means to
    honor minority rights and welcoming different religions within, kind of,
    a social and civil fabric.
        And India has done a magnificent job of showing the world how
    democracy can work. And it's--India is--I'm confident the country will
    play a constructive role and can do so in a much better way--many
    times--than the United States can. I mean, after all, there are 150
    [million]* Muslims living within the Indian democracy. We got a lot of
    Muslims in the United States, as well, which shows the world that it's--
    you're capable of honoring--worshiping God as you see fit, and you can
    do so in a free way and, at the same time, be a productive citizen of a
    state.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *White House correction.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        And India can help a lot. I was very impressed by its contribution
    to a new democracy in the neighborhood, and that's Afghanistan. India
    has provided $565 million of cash, recently pledged an additional $50
    million to build the Afghan National Assembly building. And that's
    responsible--a responsible nation does that. And it's a--it goes to
    show--at least says to me that India understands that a democracy in our
    neighborhood will help yield peace, because if you study the history of
    the world, regions that had been in turmoil are now peaceful as a result
    of the evolution of democracy.
        And one of the points I made in my address to the Asia Society is
    that there are--there's more democracies now in the region, which will
    make it easier for a current Prime Minister, future Prime Minister of
    India to help achieve the vision that we all want, which is a peaceful
    world.

    India-U.S. Relations

        Q. Mr. President, in this era of free-flow capital, why would--why
    are there so many restrictions about inflow of talent--human capital to
    the United States, who probably add wealth and knowledge----
        The President. I appreciate that question. I am--you're talking
    about visa restrictions for highly educated citizens. I am for lifting
    those. I think we ought to raise the level of those who are either
    educated here and stay here and/or come meeting high--with high skill
    levels. It's in our interest. I've always been a proponent of that.
        And likewise, I would hope that India would lift its investment
    caps. In other words--and part of the trip is to kind of work on ways to
    continue to develop this strategic relationship in a constructive way.
    It's a--you know, I said something interesting--at least I thought it
    was interesting--in the speech. I said, for a period of time, if you're
    a friend of Pakistan, you couldn't deal with India, and if you're a

    [[Page 334]]

    friend of India, you couldn't deal with Pakistan. And we have tried to
    change the relationships so that people recognize it's in their interest
    that the United States is a friend of Pakistan's, and people in Pakistan
    recognize it's in their interest that the United States is a friend of
    India's to help, if need be, reduce tensions.
        Right now the level of tensions are, relatively speaking, down. I
    can remember when I first came into office. You might remember, there
    was a series of incidents that got everybody quite nervous, and we had
    shuttle diplomacy--Colin Powell. And it
    seems to me that there is a renewed commitment to resolving problems. I
    thought it was very interesting that trade between the two countries has
    doubled, that there's, you know, new transportation hubs. That's all
    very positive in terms of resolving issues.
        You asked me about the relationship, how it's evolved, and I
    mentioned to you that as time passes sometimes and circumstances change,
    relationships are able to develop a new dynamic. I would hope that time
    and circumstantial change is enabling India and Pakistan to develop a
    new dynamic. It appears to be that way.
        Final question.

    President's Upcoming Visit to India

        Q. Between a cricket match and a Bollywood movie, what would a----
        The President. Cricket match and a----
        Q. You like watching?
        The President. What was the second?
        Q. It's between a Bollywood movie and a cricket match.
        The President. I'm a cricket match person. [Laughter] I appreciate
    it. As I understand it, I may have a little chance to learn something
    about cricket. It's a great pastime. [Laughter]
        Q. But, Mr. President, you're going to India, but you're not
    visiting the Taj Mahal.
        The President. I know. It means I'm going to have to----
        Q. Have you broken a promise to the First Lady?
        The President. No, it means I'm going to have to come back. It's a--
    I am disappointed with that. People who have seen the Taj Mahal say that
    it's--pictures don't do it justice. It's one of the great magnificent
    sites of the world. And look, if I were the scheduler, perhaps I'd be
    doing things differently. But you want me doing one thing. I'll be the
    President; we've got the scheduler being the scheduler. I'm going to
    miss a lot of the really interesting parts of your great country; I know
    that. I would hope that I would be invited back sometime after this
    trip.
        Q. You could be in trouble with the ``Desperate Housewife.''
        The President. Yes. Well, she's certainly the star of the family.
    She's really looking forward to going with me.

    India

        Q. Mr. President, what is your earliest memory of India?
        Press Secretary Scott McClellan. We've got to go to the next one.
        Q. What is your earliest memory of India and Indians?
        The President. My best memory?
        Q. Earliest.
        The President. At least memory?
        Press Secretary McClellan. Earliest.
        The President. Earliest. [Laughter]
        Q. Earliest.
        The President. Gandhi. It's my first memory, as I think about
    India--you know, a person who was so spiritual that he captured the
    imagination of the entire world. He's proof positive that--throughout
    history there have been individuals that have had the capacity to shape
    thought and to influence and--beyond border. And he did that.
        Q. You watched the movie?
        The President. I watched that too. But that's--but my memory was
    earlier than that.
        Thank you.

    [[Page 335]]

        Q. Thank you very much.
        The President. Enjoyed it.

    Note: The interview was taped at 1:49 p.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the
    White House. In his remarks, the President referred to Prime Minister
    Manmohan Singh of India; A.Q. Khan, former head of Pakistan's nuclear
    weapons program; and former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell. The
    transcript was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on February
    23. A tape was not available for verification of the content of this
    interview.