[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2005, Book II)]
[November 17, 2005]
[Pages 1729-1734]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



The President's News Conference With President Roh Moo-hyun of South Korea in Gyeongju, South Korea
November 17, 2005

    President Roh. Good afternoon. I just had a very constructive and 
meaningful meeting with President Bush. Today's meeting is my fifth 
meeting with President Bush. The last time was 5 months ago, in June. 
Since this is his first visit to Korea during my administration, it 
gives me particular pleasure to welcome him to Korea, along with all the 
people of Korea.
    At this meeting, we were able to reaffirm that the Korea-U.S. 
alliance, based on the common values of democracy and market economy, is 
strong and that it is developing into a comprehensive, dynamic, and 
mutually beneficial alliance. We also agreed that the Korea-U.S. 
alliance will continue to contribute to peace and stability in the 
region. Furthermore, we were able to reaffirm that most of the major 
issues related to our alliance are progressing smoothly and that the 
agreed points are being implemented faithfully.
    For the remaining issues, we agreed that they would be resolved in 
close consultation with each other, to benefit both sides, based on 
mutual respect and the spirit of our alliance. President Bush and I 
agreed to launch a ministerial level strategic dialog to conduct indepth 
consultations on the future direction of our alliance and other far-
ranging issues.
    With regard to the North Korean nuclear issue, we reiterated that a 
nuclear-armed North Korea will not be tolerated and reaffirmed that the 
issue should be resolved through peaceful and diplomatic means. In order 
to implement the September 19th joint statement of the six-party talks, 
Korea and the U.S. agreed to work closely together. We especially felt 
that the second phase of the fifth round of six-party talks should be 
held as soon as possible in order to find a breakthrough in resolving 
the nuclear issue.
    Furthermore, we had a sincere dialog about building a peace 
structure on the Korean Peninsula. Going beyond the resolution of the 
North Korean nuclear issue, we both felt that a strong peace structure 
must be in place in order not only to reduce tensions but also build 
permanent peace and trust in order to create a new future for the Korean 
Peninsula.
    It gives me particular pleasure to be able to welcome President Bush 
to Gyeongju, the capital city of the Silla dynasty and the city more 
than 1,000 years old. I hope this will be an occasion for him to 
experience firsthand the beauty of Korea's fall weather and our 
beautiful culture. I also hope that Mr. and Mrs. Bush will come to 
better understand the history and culture of Korea. I hope you will have 
a wonderful visit. Thank you.
    President Bush. Mr. President, thank you. Mr. President, thank you 
very much. You do have a beautiful country. And we've got a strong 
relationship. We've got a good

[[Page 1730]]

personal relationship, and our countries are bound together by common 
values and our deep desire for freedom and peace. Thank you very much 
for your hospitality. Really been looking forward to my second trip to 
your wonderful country.
    I told the President during our discussions that I felt like the 
ties between our two countries has never been better. In a relationship 
like ours, there's obviously complexities. But the important thing is to 
work together to solve those complexities in a spirit of friendship. And 
secondly, I know how important our relationship is to help promote 
stability in this part of the world.
    Yesterday I gave a speech in Kyoto where I, with all sincerity, 
praised the great progress of your country, Mr. President. You have 
shown how economic prosperity and political freedom go hand in hand for 
the good of the people. And as we helicoptered in from Busan today, it's 
very clear that the economic prosperity of this part of the world is 
very strong, and so is the political freedom.
    We did have a wide-ranging discussion. We talked, of course, about 
the North Korean issue. We talked about the need to make sure that we 
continue to strategize through this--five of us who are working with 
North Korea to get North Korea to implement that which it said it would 
do, which is to verifiably get rid of its nuclear weapons and programs. 
It's in the world's interest that this happen. It's also in our interest 
that we continue to work together to solve the problem.
    I see a peninsula one day that is united and at peace. And that's a 
vision, Mr. President, that I know you share as well. And that's a--it's 
the right vision. There's a real possibility that by working together, 
at some point in time, the peninsula will be united and at peace. And I 
want to appreciate that vision of yours, sir.
    We also talked about our bilateral relations. Well, let me--first, I 
want to thank the President and the people of this wonderful country for 
sending more than 3,000 troops to Iraq to help that democracy flourish. 
And it's a--to me, it's not only a gesture of friendship, but it's a 
gesture of understanding that a democracy in the heart of the Middle 
East will help bring peace to others. And I thank you for your 
leadership, Mr. President, not only in--on the troops but as well as 
providing assistance to both Iraq and Afghanistan. We're bound by our 
love of freedom. And those commitments by your government indicate how 
close we are in terms of promoting the values of freedom and democracy.
    I also want to thank you very much for your help for the victims of 
Hurricane Katrina. That meant a lot to our people. It was very generous 
of you, Mr. President, to do just that.
    We talked about our working together on--make sure that the world is 
a world that trades freely and fairly, that--appreciate the President's 
leadership at the upcoming APEC summit, where I'm hopeful that all of us 
will join together in promoting a successful Doha round at the WTO with 
the understanding it's in our nations' interests that we have free and 
fair trade, but it's in the interests of developing nations that there 
be free and fair trade. The World Bank estimated that hundreds of 
millions of people will be lifted out of poverty if this round goes 
forward. And I know you share the same concern I share about poverty in 
the world, Mr. President.
    At some point in time, I look forward to continuing our bilateral 
trade relations. At the appropriate time, our governments will come 
together and discuss how to further trade for the benefit of both 
countries.
    Finally, Mr. President, I look forward to continuing to work with 
you to promote a foundation for peace and freedom, whether it be here on 
the peninsula or around this globe. And I know I've got a good partner 
in peace and freedom when I have discussions with you. So thanks for 
your hospitality. Really gracious of you to have--make time for a 
bilateral meeting

[[Page 1731]]

in the midst of all your planning for the APEC summit. And Laura and I are just thrilled to be here. Thank you.
    President Roh. Next we will have a question-and-answer session. We 
will take four questions in all.

Inter-Korean Summit Meeting/South Korea-U.S. Relations

    Q. First, I have a question to President Roh--actually, I have two 
questions. By holding early inter-Korean summit meeting, some people are 
saying that this would help to resolve the nuclear issue of North Korea. 
With regard to where and how the second Korean summit meeting, the 
government has said that it is not an issue as to where the meeting will 
be held. And I would like to ask your position on that. And second, 
through your summit meeting today, you have said that the Korea-U.S. 
alliance is very strong, indeed. But some people are seeing--since your 
administration took office, we are seeing cracks in the alliance. I 
would like to hear your opinion on this issue as well, please.
    President Roh. Yes, thank you very much for that question. As for a 
second inter-Korean summit meeting, the Korean Government has always 
said that it is open to the possibility of a second inter-Korean summit 
meeting, and we wish to meet again with the leader of North Korea. But 
North Korea will probably have its own strategies. The North Korean 
nuclear issue has to be resolved, and I'm not sure whether North Korea 
thinks that it would be beneficial for them to meet with South Korea 
before or after the resolution of the North Korean nuclear issues. I 
think that this is probably something that North Korea will have to 
judge and decide. This is the status that we are at right now.
    And in this situation, Korea--if we just look at the second inter-
Korean summit meeting and the holding of that meeting, itself, as 
something that has a very important outcome, I really don't think that 
this will help North Korea's nuclear issue to be resolved. Of course, 
it's important that we meet, but what's more important is the content of 
the meeting, what we can agree upon and what we can resolve through an 
inter-Korean summit meeting. So I don't think that we should hold a 
summit meeting just for the sake of holding a summit meeting. We need to 
very sincerely consult this issue and think it over as to the content of 
the meeting.
    And the second question was about the Korea-U.S. alliance, and I 
know that many people are saying many things about this alliance. I know 
that perspectives can differ according to the angle that they take. I'd 
like to ask you back a question, actually. Since the Korean war, Korea 
and the United States have held various talks, and we are currently in 
the process of handling many, many issues and resolving many issues. And 
I'd like to ask, when was a time where you had more issues solved and 
more issues discussed?
    We're talking about realignment of the U.S. forces in Korea. We're 
talking about strategic flexibility. We're talking about deployment of 
Korean troops to Iraq. We're looking at the relocation of the Yongsan 
Garrison. Many issues are being dealt with now. These are very heavy 
items to be discussing in terms of my politics, and it is sometimes a 
political burden for us to be discussing these issues at one time. But 
we are happy doing this for the past 2 or so years, and most of these 
issues have been resolved very well.
    I'd like to ask you to think about the past administrations and 
think about this administration in comparison with them. We are in very 
smooth and open communication with the United States. And for inter-
Korean relations as well, this is probably the most stable situation 
between the two Koreas that you have ever seen. And the Korea-U.S. 
dialog is going on very smoothly, and we are reaching very high-level 
agreements as well. And this is an interactive dialog that we are 
having. It's a two-way dialog where we engage in dialog

[[Page 1732]]

very seriously and voice all of our opinions and discuss them. And I 
think that this is an area where we are having these open communications 
between Korea and the United States, and we are able to confirm this 
open communication in our meeting as well.
    And the Korea-U.S. alliance is in a very good state, and I do 
believe that it will continue to become even better. And I think that 
our frank discussions between President Bush and myself and also among 
our officials as well will leave foundation for even stronger ties 
between Korea and the United States and the Korea-U.S. alliance to grow 
even further.
    Next we'd like to have a United States journalist ask a question to 
President Bush. Please go ahead with your question.

War in Iraq/Capitol Hill Politics

    Q. Mr. President, Vice President Cheney called it reprehensible for 
critics to question how you took the country to war, but Senator Hagel 
says it's patriotic to ask those kinds of questions. Who do you think is 
right?
    President Bush. The Vice President.
    Q. Why?
    President Bush. Well, look, ours is a country where people ought to 
be able to disagree, and I expect there to be criticism. But when 
Democrats say that I deliberately misled the Congress and the people, 
that's irresponsible. They looked at the same intelligence I did, and 
they voted--many of them voted to support the decision I made. It's 
irresponsible to use politics. This is serious business making--winning 
this war. But it's irresponsible to do what they've done. So I agree 
with the Vice President.
    Q. [Inaudible]
    President Bush. I think people ought to be allowed to ask questions. 
It is irresponsible to say that I deliberately misled the American 
people when it came to the very same intelligence they looked at and 
came to the--many of them came to the same conclusion I did. Listen, I--
patriotic as heck to disagree with the President. It doesn't bother me. 
What bothers me is when people are irresponsibly using their positions 
and playing politics, and that's exactly what is taking place in 
America.
    President Roh. We'd like to take another question for President 
Bush, please. Another question for President Bush from a U.S. 
journalist, please.
    President Bush. Your name is not----

North Korean Nuclear Program/Aid

    Q. Oh, I'm sorry.
    President Bush. You can go ahead and grab the mike if you want to. 
[Laughter] But I didn't know you were called Caren [Caren Bohan, 
Reuters].
    Q. I didn't hear a name.
    President Bush. That's fine.
    Q. Thank you, sir. The North Koreans have said they don't believe 
the agreement they signed in September binds them to give up nuclear 
weapons before they get any assistance.
    President Bush. Before getting assistance--yes.
    Q. Yes. Are you willing to give them assistance first?
    And President Roh, your country gives a lot of assistance to North 
Korea already. Does that put your approach at odds with the approach of 
the U.S.?
    President Bush. The issue really is the light-water reactor. Our 
position is, is that we'll consider the light-water reactor at the 
appropriate time. The appropriate time is after they have verifiably 
given up their nuclear weapons and/or programs.
    President Roh. Next, from KBS. Please ask your question.

North Korean Human Rights/Six-Party Talks

    Q. I have two questions to President Roh. First, with regard to 
human rights in North Korea, I do understand that the third committee of 
the United Nations will be putting the resolution on the North Korean 
human rights to vote. I would like

[[Page 1733]]

to ask about reports that there are differences in opinions between you 
and President Bush with regard to North Korean human rights issues. I'd 
like to ask what was the discussion between you in tonight's--in today's 
meeting. And I'd also like to ask President Roh about our principles on 
voting in the United Nations on this resolution.
    And second, in the last meeting between you and President Bush, 
President Bush mentioned Mr. Kim Chong-il, and it was also--some 
analysts also said that that summit meeting between you and President 
Bush helped the discussions in the six-party talks. This summit meeting 
between you and President Bush is being held in the recess period of the 
fifth six-party talks. I'd like to ask if you think that this summit 
meeting today--do you have any message to the six-party talks and North 
Korea?
    President Roh. I see that the U.S. journalists are just asking one 
question to President Bush, but we're taking two questions from our 
journalists right now.
    With regard to the human rights issue in North Korea--now, human 
rights is a universal value of humankind. It's something that is very 
valuable. And Korea has a very proactive position when it comes to human 
rights issues in the world. But between the two Koreas, we have very 
many important issues that we have to solve politically, and we always 
have to take into consideration the status of the relationship between 
the two Koreas. And that is what I have to say about the North Korean 
nuclear--the North Korean human rights issue.
    And I do believe that during President Lincoln's term in office, 
people were always talking about the slavery, and President Lincoln was 
always attacked about not doing anything for slavery, to release the 
slaves. And I do understand that President Lincoln was quite slow in 
liberating the slaves in the United States. And this was because the 
President, if he took the lead in this issue, he thought that the--
America would be divided in opinion, and this would be very serious. And 
in reality, the Civil War did take place. And because of this issue of 
slaves, there was a situation where the United States was in jeopardy, 
and because of that, he had to go through a process to ensure that the 
country would stay together. President Lincoln's first priority was 
unity among the States of America, and in this large framework of unity, 
he pursued his policy to free the slaves in the United States. As a 
result, before the end of the Civil War in the United States, I do 
understand that President Lincoln was able to free all the slaves in 
America, and they were actually--and many people went into the army, 
many of the slaves, former slaves went into the army and fought for 
President Lincoln.
    And this evaluation of President Lincoln's policies was carried out 
actually 11 years after President Lincoln's death by a scholar who was 
looking into the situation of the slaves in the United States. I think 
that this is quite similar to the position that we are taking when it 
comes to North Korean human rights issues.
    And your second question--what was it again, please, after human 
rights?
    Q. [Inaudible]
    President Roh. As for the North Korean nuclear issue, President Bush 
and I engaged in a lengthy discussion on that issue. And the contents of 
the discussion were basically that we agreed on the fundamental 
principles when it came to the North Korean nuclear issue. And in the 
process of the six-party talks, how North Korea would act, the tactics 
of North Korea when it came to the details, we had some ideas to 
exchange, and because of that, the discussion of the North Korean 
nuclear issue was quite lengthy.
    But I must say that we do not have any differing opinions on this. 
We are basically looking to resolve this North Korean nuclear issue, and 
we are exploring for ways that we can resolve this issue. We have no 
disagreement at all that this issue must

[[Page 1734]]

be resolved. And in understanding the attitude of North Korea, I do 
believe that we were able to share a recognition on North Korea's 
attitude in this whole process.
    And with regard to this issue, the authorities of both sides, Korea 
and the United States, must work closely in cooperation and consult with 
each other. And we agreed that we need to have--share an agreement if we 
want the whole process to succeed. And overall, this North Korean 
nuclear issue should be resolved peacefully within the framework of the 
six-party talks. And we were quite optimistic that it would be able to 
be resolved in the framework of the six-party talks.
    If I just add one more point, the six-party talks, yes, definitely 
it is a difficult task to accomplish. But the United States, when it 
looks at Northeast Asia, the Korean Peninsula, the North Korean nuclear 
issue, it has many policies. But I do believe that these policies are 
some of the United States most successful policies, indeed.
    And here in Korea as well, the inter-Korean relations are very 
stable indeed. And in the process of resolving this North Korean nuclear 
issue, once again I do believe that we are in close cooperation with the 
United States, and we have this framework of the six-party talks. And 
this is a framework that includes all the members of the Northeast Asian 
community, and we are responding to the North Korean nuclear issue 
together. So I think that we are holding dialog on a very stable 
foundation.
    Of course, North Korea is not someone that we can very easily engage 
in discussion and dialog with. North Korea probably has its own very 
complex attitudes and positions, but this has always been the case with 
North Korea. And in our process of engaging in dialog with North Korea, 
I think that we have the most strategic and solid foundation of dialog 
that we have ever had. Therefore, once again, when it comes to the 
United States Northeast Asia policies, I think that they are in a very 
good direction indeed. And that was what I did mention during our talks. 
And when I first met with President Bush, I asked him to also listen to 
opinions that things were going well in Northeast Asia, that things 
would go well in Northeast Asia as well.
    Thank you very much. And this concludes today's joint press 
conference.

Note: The President's news conference began at 12:15 p.m. at the Hotel 
Hyundai. President Roh referred to Chairman Kim Chong-il of North Korea. 
President Roh and some reporters spoke in Korean, and their remarks were 
translated by an interpreter.