    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2005, Book II)]
    [June 30, 2005]
    [Pages 1171-1180]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Interview With Foreign Print Journalists
    June 30, 2005

        The President. Just a couple of comments. One, I'm looking forward
    to going to the G-8. It's always a good opportunity to talk about common
    values, common interests, ways we can work together to improve the
    world. I'm looking forward to seeing the leaders. I've got a good
    personal

    [[Page 1172]]

    relationship with the leaders. It's a good chance to visit.
        Agenda items are--important agenda items: Africa, I just gave a
    speech on the continent of Africa; global climate change, it's important
    to move the debate beyond the Kyoto era and talk about what we can do
    together to improve the environment. I'm looking forward to that. One of
    the things there hasn't been much focus on is, there will be time to
    discuss progress in the Middle East--the Middle East peace process. Jim
    Wolfensohn is coming to discuss a way
    forward, how we can all help the Palestinians improve their security,
    enhance the entrepreneurial spirit so people can see their lives
    improve. We're looking forward to that.
        Anyway, it's going to be a good trip. I'm looking forward to going
    to Denmark. The Prime Minister is a
    friend. He's a good man. He's got a good, strong backbone. When he says
    he's going to do something, he means it. I'm looking forward to seeing
    Her Majesty the Queen. It's going to be a
    good experience. I've never been to Denmark, so I'm looking forward to
    going.
        Charlie, we'll start with you, and then we'll do a couple of rounds,
    and I'll let you all go get some lunch.

    Aid to Africa

        Q. All right. My first question really is an aid question, with
    respect to Africa. Mr. Blair has really been pressing this issue of
    dramatically increased aid to Africa. You have substantially increased
    U.S. assistance to Africa, but on the other hand, it falls way short of
    what Mr. Blair has been asking for. You've been really, I think, fairly
    cool to both the $25 billion that he's asked and the commitment for,
    what is it, seven-tenths of a percent of GDP for foreign assistance.
        The President. A couple of comments on that. One is that our aid
    increase has been dramatic. We've tripled our aid since I've been
    President, and I just announced today that I'll ask Congress to double
    it by 2010, which is a significant increase.
        Secondly, though, you've got to look at Africa as more than just
    aid. Aid is one aspect of participating on the continent in a
    compassionate way. Trade is a vital part of lifting people out of
    poverty.
        The other thing is, you know, there's all kinds of ways to calculate
    generosity. I happen to think that the formula that some people try to
    use is not an effective way to judge America's generosity or a fair way.
    For example, we've got a Tax Code structure to encourage private
    citizens to contribute. And so I will remind our G-8 friends that aid to
    developing countries is more than just grants from Government. It is
    grants from Government. It is generous contributions by private
    individuals, and we contribute billions on an annual basis.
        I'm also going to tell people that a compassionate policy is one
    that focuses less on formulas and more on improving people's lives. And
    so today I talked about the malaria initiative, for example. There's a
    great place where the G-8 countries can come together and help nations
    on the continent of Africa eradicate malaria.
        So I'm going to the G-8 with an agenda, where we've been the leader.
    The HIV/AIDS initiative was a powerful statement of our compassion and
    our willingness to take the lead on a lot of issues.
        Klaus.

    Iraq/War on Terror

        Q. Another subject which will be in some way at the G-8 meeting
    also, Iraq. Denmark is contributing a substantial proportion of the
    amount of troops to the conflict. Your most recent speech continuously
    made the link between the conflict and 9/11. How do you react towards
    those who say that connection has been disproved and that growing
    skepticism in this country and even more in Europe cannot simply be
    dismissed by your resolve to stay the course, as you say?

    [[Page 1173]]

        The President. My point was, about September the 11th, is that
    America was attacked, and now we're at war in a global war on terror.
    That's the connection with September the 11th. Some in Europe, I
    recognize, view September the 11th as a terrible moment. We view it as
    not only a terrible moment but a clear indication that we're at war with
    an ideology, people that are willing to use terror to spread their
    ideology. So my speech, if you look carefully at how it was written--I'm
    confident you did, Klaus--shows that I was making the connection between
    the attack and the global war on terror that we now face--and the
    ideology of those who attacked us is very similar to those that have now
    gone into Iraq to try to stop the progress--and make clear, our strategy
    is to find the terrorists, bring them to justice before they harm us
    here, as well as defeat the ideology of hate with an ideology of hope,
    and that's democracy. Our strategy in Iraq is to promote a stable
    democracy, in other words, encourage political progress and, at the same
    time, train up the Iraqis so they can do the fighting.
        And I look forward to sharing my thoughts about the progress we are
    making with your Prime Minister.
    They've been--Denmark has been a steadfast ally, and I know he has
    obviously stood strong in the face of political pressures, made a
    decision based upon what he thought was right for the world, spreading
    peace.
        I strongly believe that we're laying the foundation for peace for
    generations to come. I reject the notion that certain countries cannot
    be democratic. I view that elitist--I view that as condemning people to
    hopelessness. Our policy up to now, prior to September the 11th, was,
    ``Why don't we just kind of tolerate tyranny and hope for the best.'' It
    doesn't work that way, and we learned a strong lesson.
        The speech, I think you'll see, was that the attack indicated we're
    at war, and Iraq is part of that war. Otherwise, why would people be
    pouring into the country trying to defeat us? Why? Because they fear
    democracy. They fear the competing ideology that is a hopeful ideology.
        Joe.

    U.S. Aid to Africa

        Q. Mr. President, a question about your malaria program.
        The President. Sure.
        Q. By the time we get back to the office, there will probably be a
    statement from some group praising your proposal but saying once
    again,``Why didn't the President go through the Global Fund to Fight
    AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria?'' Why do a separate program?
        The President. Well, first of all, we are supporting the Global
    Fund. But like our AIDS Initiative, we also feel it is an effective way
    to achieve results. See, you just asked a process question. You're
    assuming somebody is going to--let's focus on the process. What I want
    the world to do is focus on how best to get the job done, how best to
    achieve the objective.
        And so our strategy has been two-fold: one, support the Global Fund;
    but on the other hand, target specific countries. And if you noticed, I
    said in there, this will--we're taking the lead. We want people to
    follow. We want people in other countries to follow--we want people to
    follow. And the United States Government is going to take the lead. The
    Gates Foundation is taking the lead, and I call upon other governments,
    other foundations, to do the same. So our strategy is one of results,
    how best to achieve the objective.
        Give me your name again.
        Q. Olivier. You can call me Mr. Knox. That's fine. [Laughter]
        The President. Pretty good. Pretty good retort. [Laughter] Very
    good. Olivier.

    Iran

        Q. Thank you, sir. Sir, were you surprised when you heard the
    allegations that the President-elect of Iran might have been

    [[Page 1174]]

    one of the people who took Americans hostage in Tehran? And do you have
    any information that would confirm or refute those charges?
        The President. I have no information, but obviously, this is--
    his involvement raises many questions,
    and knowing how active people are at finding answers to questions, I'm
    confident they'll be found. And I spoke to Prime Minister Blair this morning, spoke to Chancellor Schroeder the other day. I look forward to speaking to Jacques
    Chirac when we get to Scotland.
        My message is, is that it's very important at this moment for the
    EU-3 to send a strong message to the new person there that the world is
    united in saying that you should not be given the capabilities of
    enriching uranium, which could then be converted into a nuclear weapon.
    In other words, we've got a new man who
    has assumed power, and he must hear a focused message. I was pleased
    with Gerhard Schroeder's statement here,
    and Prime Minister Blair can speak for himself.
    But let me just say, I believe the EU-3's message is going to be a very
    strong message, and that's where our message is--that's where my
    attention is focused right now.
        In order to achieve a diplomatic objective, it's very important to
    have clear goals. And we have a clear goal, and that is to say to the
    Iranians--well, there's a clear understanding that Iran should not have
    a nuclear weapon. It would be a very destabilizing, dangerous situation.
    And the world is speaking in one voice, and so the message now to the
    new leader is a very strong message.
        Charlie.

    Trade With Africa

        Q. With regard to trade, African leaders have been pretty loud in
    pointing out that subsidies and tariffs are a tremendous handicap to the
    development of trade. Europe, in particular, has been hostile to really
    lifting tariffs and subsidies. Any chance of any movement on that,
    within the context of the G-8?
        The President. Well, I appreciate you bringing that up. The African
    Growth and Opportunity Act, signed by my predecessor and extended by the
    Congress in my administration, is working. I want to remind people that
    ultimately it's commerce, trade, economic growth that will overwhelm the
    need for aid itself. And exports from sub-Sahara Africa to the United
    States are up 88 percent because we've opened up our markets.
        The best approach to dealing with Europe--and our own subsidies for
    that matter--on agricultural matters, is to go to the Doha round of the
    WTO and jointly declare that we're going to get rid of all agricultural
    subsidies. That has been our proposal.
        The other thing is, it's very important for African nations
    themselves to eliminate the barriers of trade intracontinent, between
    themselves. There are, if you look--at least there was the last time I
    looked--there were some impediments to trade amongst the African
    nations. And so the--we've all got responsibilities to make trade freer.
        I said in my speech today that it's--the World Bank estimated that a
    successful Doha round--in other words, a new trading regime that enabled
    all countries to trade freely, would lift 140 million people out of
    poverty, in their estimate. And that's why this Doha round is very
    important. And so we'll spend time articulating how best to continue
    moving forward on the Doha round. That's probably the most--the place
    where you're going to find that would be most effective in being able to
    deal with the subsidies, whether it be the EU or our own subsidies for
    that matter.
        Klaus.

    Guantanamo Bay Detainees

        Q. Guantanamo is still a very hot topic for many Europeans. After 3
    years, there are still prisoners there who haven't had

    [[Page 1175]]

    their case heard. And the U.N. now are talking about investigating
    secret U.S. prisons and detainee facilities. Is that a thing--in the
    investigation, the U.S. would cooperate with? And don't you have fears
    that this is going to harm the U.S. image a lot if this situation goes
    on for years?
        The President. Well, I think--I think if the truth is not told, it's
    a problem. But let's talk about the truth, in terms of Guantanamo. First
    of all, there's inspections 24 hours a day, 7 days a week available for
    the International Red Cross. There's been a lot of press contingents
    down to take a look at the situation firsthand and a lot of
    congressional folks going down. In other words, a lot of people--there's
    a transparent situation there.
        I think we probably had about 800 or so people detained there, and
    remember, Klaus, I made a decision as to what to do with people swept
    off of a battlefield who didn't wear uniforms. I mean, this is a
    different kind of war. I made the decision they would be treated
    humanely, just like the Geneva Accords insist, and they have been.
        Of the 800 detained, some 200 or so have been sent back to their
    countries. In other words, we screened and analyzed and took a look at
    whether they would be a threat again. I'm in a dilemma--at one point
    during this process, because people were let back out on the--sent back
    to a country, and they ended up killing an American. What do I tell the
    loved one? In other words, these people were fighting. They were
    fighters. They were on the battlefield.
        Secondly, I agree with you. We need to make sure there is a way
    forward. And that's why I set up military commissions. But the
    military--and by the way, in a military commission, people would have
    lawyers; they would have--there would be procedures, court procedures.
    Unfortunately--or fortunately, I shouldn't--let me take that back--what
    has happened has been that our court system is analyzing, making a
    judicial decision as to whether or not the military--these people should
    be tried in a military commission or in a civilian court, and we're
    awaiting a verdict on that. And once that happens, then there will be a
    way forward.
        Joe.

    Debt Relief/Development Grants

        Q. Mr. President, a question about debt cancellation.
        The President. Yes.
        Q. The G-8 finance ministers came up with a figure of 18 countries.
    Shortly after that, a number of African Presidents meeting in Nigeria
    said, ``It's a good start. We'd like more.'' Is that 18 figure carved in
    stone, or is there----
        The President. Not at all, Joe. There's a--it's a criterion-based
    agreement, and that other countries will be able to qualify for debt
    forgiveness as well. So there's a way forward for the other countries
    that they expressed concerns about.
        The other thing is, is that I would hope people would take notice of
    the initiative that I proposed a couple of years ago, and that is the
    World Bank, in its desire to help developing nations, give grants as
    opposed to loans. And we're making progress toward that goal. Jim
    Wolfensohn did a fine job of making
    progress toward that goal, and Paul Wolfowitz will continue toward that goal.
        But the idea is that we're relieving the pressure on the balance
    sheet. But governments have got to make good choices. They've got to be
    willing to invest and fight corruption, kind of like the criterion in
    our Millennium Challenge Account, which is a very important initiative.
    It's one I called on Congress to fund. Congress has been reluctant to
    fully fund our request because we haven't got the money out the door
    fast enough. And so my message today was, like it has been the last
    couple of times I've talked about Millennium Challenge Account, we'll do
    a better job of processing and moving along.

    [[Page 1176]]

        Olivier.
        Q. Thank you, sir.
        The President. One more round after this, so everybody be preparing
    your questions.

    Sudan

        Q. On Darfur, sir, the Deputy Secretary of State told the House
    Foreign Relations Committee this week or last that the United States and
    Europe shouldn't send troops to Darfur because they would come up
    against bloodthirsty, coldblooded killers. Does this mean that the
    bloodthirsty, coldblooded killers can set the agenda in Darfur? And what
    do you say to some critics who say that your administration is easing
    off Sudan because of good counterterrorism intelligence cooperation?
        The President. That's a preposterous claim. It's not even close to
    the truth. First, my administration, with Jack Danforth and Colin Powell's good work,
    helped solve the north-south civil war. And now we're working close--
    working with parties to get that peace agreement implemented.
        Secondly, the strategy, an effective strategy, is to work with the
    AU--African Union--and use AU forces to help keep the warring parties
    apart while we continue to press the Sudanese Government as well as
    rebel groups for a comprehensive settlement. And the United States has
    helped--worked with NATO and the EU to provide logistical support for
    the movement of 7,700 troops into Darfur.
        Today I announced it will help build 16 additional base camps; it
    will provide maintenance services, as well as C-130 to help remove
    Rwandan troops. We spend a lot of time on this important issue. Ours is
    a nation that called this a genocide. And we take this situation in
    Darfur very seriously--and, by the way, lead in terms of aid and working
    with other nations. Canada, by the way, has come up with a big tranche
    of aid the other day, for which we're grateful.
        Charlie.

    Zimbabwe

        Q. What are you telling or asking Thabo Mbeki now, as Robert Mugabe
    intensifies his crackdown against his opposition in Zimbabwe?
        The President. As you know, Thabo Mbeki was
    here. You might remember, I did go to South Africa as well. And my
    message has been very consistent: ``You're a great democracy. You're
    showing the world what is possible after the terrible period of
    apartheid. In other words, you showed how to reconcile differences, and
    you're a very strong nation on the continent of Africa. And next door to
    you is a person that is destroying a country
    because of bad policy, and it's not right. And the nations in the
    neighborhood must be strong.''
        I was asked yesterday, are we willing to tie some of our aid to the
    position that nations take on Zimbabwe? I said no because I don't want
    people to suffer as a result of--more people to suffer as a result of
    Zimbabwe. In other words, our aid is focused at people.
        And on the other hand, working with nations and providing help and
    aid and trade and, you know, partnering does give us a chance to lend
    our voice to others who are saying, ``This has got to change in
    Zimbabwe.'' He is a terrible example.
        Q. Are you disappointed in Mbeki?
        The President. I'm disappointed in Mugabe.
    He is--Zimbabwe was a bread basket, provided a lot of food on a
    continent that often needs food, and it's a country being wrecked. And I
    am--the world needs to speak very clearly about the decisions he has
    made and the consequence of the decisions he has made.
        Klaus.

    President's Upcoming Visit to Denmark

        Q. You have already expressed your admiration for the Danish Prime
    Minister, but I wondered if there were other good reasons behind your
    decision to take the detour to our tiny country like Denmark

    [[Page 1177]]

    and even ruining part of your birthday by doing that? [Laughter]
        The President. No, no, it's enhancing it--it's enhancing it. Listen,
    Denmark has been a great friend of the United States for years. And I
    hope my visit sends a statement to the Danish people: Thank you for the
    friendship. I don't expect everybody to agree with the decisions my
    administration has made----
        Q. You know there will be demonstrations in Denmark?
        The President. That's fine. Good. That's the great thing about going
    to a free society, see. One of the things about--a wonderful thing about
    freedom is, people are able to express their opinions, and I expect
    people to express their opinions.
        On the other hand, I would hope my visit says to the Danish people
    that America respects you and we share values. And those shared values
    are important. They're universal values. They're not American values or
    Danish values. They're universal values, freedom of speech and minority
    rights, human dignity.
        So I'm looking forward to it. Selfishly, I'm looking forward to
    going to Denmark. I've never been there, and I can't wait to see it.
    Now, admittedly, I'm not going to take the typical tourist tour. I don't
    expect you'll find me walking the streets of--you know, in the evening,
    arm in arm with my wife. On the other hand, I bet
    I get to see enough of the country to give me a good sense of the beauty
    of the country. I'm really looking forward to it.

        Q. Do you plan to bring all your family members and your wife?

        The President. I'm bringing wife, for
    certain, and a family member. All my family
    members? It's a lot. [Laughter] If you're talking about my daughters,
    one of my daughters will be accompanying me. Thank you for asking.
        Joe.

    Group of Eight/Africa

        Q. Mr. President, David Dodge, the Governor of Canada's Central
    Bank, questions the whole G-8 process, saying it really shouldn't be
    focusing on Africa and climate change but rather global prosperity and
    economic imbalances. And he says that a new mechanism, a new institution
    is needed that includes China, India, and South Africa. What do you
    think about that?
        The President. You know, the G-8 conferences used to be focused
    strictly on global--you know, economic--our respective economies, and
    it's an economic discussion. And it's an interesting growth out of just
    talking about economics to just understanding that together we can make
    a difference by helping developing nations grow their economies as well.
    It's really what you're talking about.
        The ultimate success on the continent of Africa is going to be
    whether or not strong economies develop, being able to give people a
    chance to succeed. And many of the initiatives we're focused on will lay
    the conditions for economic growth. And you can't grow if you're at war.
    That's why I talked about the peacekeeping initiatives. You can't grow
    if you've got a huge part of the future of your nation being wiped out
    because of HIV/AIDS. It's very difficult to grow if you don't educate
    your women, and that's why I announced a very strong initiative for the
    education of girls on the continent of Africa. These are projects--it's
    hard to grow when you've got a million people dying of malaria because
    of the inability to treat a mosquito bite.
        I mean, there's something very practical about dealing with--dealing
    with, on the continent of Africa, the nations, helping nations,
    partnering nations. And I think it speaks to the admonition that ``To
    whom much is given, much is required.'' And so I find this an important
    part of an agenda.
        It shouldn't be the only agenda. We're definitely talking about the
    environment, definitely talking about Africa. But we'll

    [[Page 1178]]

    also be talking about the Palestinian conflict. There's a chance for G-8
    nations, developed nations to help the Palestinians. We'll be talking
    about our economies. There's always a nice discussion about currency,
    for example--an interesting part of the dialog. And I find it
    interesting to talk with other nations about what they are doing to
    stimulate their economies.
        I suspect this G-8--in other words, there will be very--current
    events will be discussed one way or the other. Iraq, of course, will be
    discussed. But obviously, one of the interesting parts of this G-8 that
    folks will be looking at will be the recent issues within the EU. And my
    message there will be the same as it was here when Jose Barroso and others came, Juncker came, and I said, ``Look, we want Europe to succeed.
    We want there to be a Europe that is whole, free, and at peace. And we
    want Europe to be successful in its enterprise, and we want it to be
    growing.'' I mean, after all, we've got enormous trade with Europe, and
    trade is an important part of raising standards of living. If that's the
    case, you want your trading partner to be healthy. And so we'll be
    discussing--I'm confident there will be some discussions about what has
    taken place.
        I'm looking forward to it. In other words, a broad agenda makes
    sense to me.

    G-8 Membership/Kyoto Protocol

        Q. But just a quick follow up----
        The President. Yes.
        Q. What about including India and China and South Africa?
        The President. Well, no, India and China and South Africa will be
    there. Absolutely. There will be some African nations there. There will
    be India, China, Brazil, and Mexico--I can't remember all the nations--
    but yes, there will be a forum or a discussion including those
    countries.
        I'm particularly interested in discussing energy with China. One of
    the--we had a problem with Kyoto because Kyoto would have--we didn't
    think the way forward to really achieve an objective we wanted because,
    first of all, Kyoto would really have hurt our economy a lot. Kyoto
    didn't include countries like India and China. And now is the chance to
    work with developed nations and developing nations to develop a way to
    share technologies, for example, that will enable us to achieve the
    objective we want.
        And the United States recognizes there's warming, and that some of
    that is caused by manmade emissions. But we also recognize that we're
    dependent upon foreign sources of oil. We want to diversify away from
    fossil fuels, and we want to help developing nations do the same. And so
    we have a great opportunity, because of the presence of these nations at
    this moment to discuss how to go forward. And so, he's right. They
    should be included, and they are.
        Final question, Olivier.

    First Lady's Upcoming Visit to Africa

        Q. Thank you, sir. Sir, you're coming back stag from Europe----
        The President. Coming back?
        Q. Stag. Your wife is going on to Africa.
        The President. That's an accurate statement.
        Q. We understand from African sources that she's going to South
    Africa, Tanzania, and----
        The President. Interesting way to put it. You could have said,
    ``You're coming back alone from Europe,'' or ``You're coming back
    sans''----
        Q. Oooh! [Laughter]
        The President. But you say, ``You're coming back stag.''
        Q. If I'd known, I would have gone with the sans. [Laughter] You
    beat me to it, sir. [Laughter]
        Communications Director Dan Bartlett.
    Where's Gregory [David Gregory, NBC News] when you need him? [Laughter]
        The President. That's right. [Laughter] Classic moment, wasn't it?
        Q. Absolutely.

    [[Page 1179]]

        The President. Were you there for that?
        Q. I was not, but I----
        The President. We're laughing about the fact that one of their
    comrades, a very important person in the White
    House pool went over to Paris, France, and fired off a series of
    questions to Jacques Chirac in French.
        Q. My mother e-mailed the corrected French. [Laughter]
        The President. That's good. [Laughter] I corrected his French too--[laughter]--and didn't even know what he
    was saying. [Laughter] This is all off the record, because this will
    hurt Gregory's feelings. Please. Holland [Steve Holland, Reuters],
    you're copiously taking notes. [Laughter]
        Q. It's going right to him. [Laughter]
        The President. Good. [Laughter]
        Communications Director Bartlett. He
    just had twins.
        The President. He had twins?
        Communications Director Bartlett. Yes,
    last week.
        The President. Fantastic. Gender?
        Communications Director Bartlett. A boy
    and a girl.
        The President. Weight? Health?
        Q. Good. Good.
        The President. Mother?
        Communications Director Bartlett.
    Strong. They're in the fives. I think both of them are 5 pounds.
        The President. That's good, 5. How big were yours?
        Communications Director Bartlett. Same,
    midsize.
        The President. We're back--where were you?
        Q. Well, we heard that your wife is going----
        The President. I'm flying alone, yes. [Laughter]
        Q. You're flying alone, sans First Lady. She's going to South
    Africa, Tanzania, Rwanda. My question to you is, what message is she
    bringing from the United States, and what can she get across that a
    diplomat or a rock star could not?
        The President. Her message is: One, the United States is committed
    to Africa, and we've got a good record; secondly, that our commitment to
    Africa is aimed at helping people. She'll be talking about educating
    young girls, and she'll be talking about our HIV/AIDS initiative. Her
    presence shows commitment. This is the second time she's been to Africa
    since I've been sworn in as President. Plus, she's a darn good diplomat.
    She speaks clearly, and she is a--she's a compassionate soul when she
    speaks, which is--she's a genuinely compassionate person. And people
    will see her compassion. And there will be no problem with her getting
    any news coverage, so, in other words, she'll be seen, which makes her
    an effective representative.
        And part of people knowing that the United States cares is for the
    messenger to have a platform. And so she'll have a--she'll have the
    ability to talk from her heart about the specific initiatives that we're
    very much involved in.
        All right, listen, thank you all. Looking forward to it. Klaus, see
    you over there? Are you going to be there?
        Q. I leave that to my colleagues.
        The President. You're going to lateral me. You're going to transfer
    me off. [Laughter] Well, I'm sure they're going to be as professional as
    you were.
        Q. I hope so.
        The President. Nice to see you again. Thank you. Appreciate you.

    Note: The interview began at 10:48 a.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the
    White House. In his remarks, the President referred to James D.
    Wolfensohn, Quartet Special Envoy for Gaza Disengagement; Prime Minister
    Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Queen Margrethe II of Denmark; President-elect
    Mahmud Ahmadi-nejad of Iran; Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United
    Kingdom; Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder of Germany; President Jacques
    Chirac of France; Paul D. Wolfowitz, President, International Bank for
    Reconstruction and Development; President

    [[Page 1180]]

    Thabo Mbeki of South Africa; President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe;
    European Commission President Jose Manuel Durao Barroso; and European
    Council President Jean-Claude Junker. A reporter referred to Deputy
    Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick. Journalists participating in the
    interview were Charles Cobb of AllAfrica.com; Klaus Justsen of Jyllands-
    Posten; Joseph DeCapua of Voice of America; and Olivier Knox of Agence
    France Press. The transcript was released by the Office of the Press
    Secretary on July 3. A tape was not available for verification of the
    content of this interview.