    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2004, Book II)]
    [July 9, 2004]
    [Pages 1267-1279]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks in Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    July 9, 2004

        The President. Thank you all for coming. Thanks for having me.
    Please be seated, unless, of course, you don't have a seat. [Laughter]
    What a spectacular drive in here. As you know, we're on a bus, and it's
    hard to park a bus in a small parking lot, by the way. [Laughter] But we
    drove through this beautiful countryside and saw thousands of your
    fellow citizens there. They were so warm and gracious in their
    hospitality. I'm sorry they're all not here so I can thank them in
    person. Hopefully, somebody is recording this on a TV camera so they'll
    hear my thanks. But it is a really--what a special part of the world.
    And thanks for having me.
        I'm here to talk about the fact that I'd like to be reelected
    President for a reason. You know, I love holding the office. It's--got a
    nice airplane to fly on and--[laughter]--housing is good. [Laughter] But
    I want to serve for 4 more years because I want the country to be safer,
    stronger, and better. I have a reason to ask for your vote.
        And I'm going to spend a lot of time in Pennsylvania because I want
    to carry Pennsylvania this time. It's an important State. And we're
    going to--and we're going to.
        I'm sorry that Laura is not with me. She's a
    fabulous First Lady, a great wife, and a wonderful mother--of my
    daughter Jenna, who is traveling with me today,
    University of Texas grad. How about that--in 4 years. [Laughter] Laura
    sends her best. She's campaigning herself. She is a--she's come to
    realize what I know in that you can make a difference in people's lives
    in so many different ways in the positions that we're honored to hold.
        I remember the time she gave the Afghan radio
    address--radio address, my radio address, and talked about women in
    Afghanistan. And it was such a comforting and reassuring voice, I'm
    sure, for the women there who had been so brutalized by the Taliban, to
    hear the First Lady speak. But the feedback from the radio address was
    really good. And she--I remember her coming back upstairs in the White
    House and saying, ``Gosh, they heard me.'' People heard that somebody in
    America cares for them, that when we talk about young girls in America
    and our desire for them to be able to realize their dreams, we also said
    the same thing about young girls in Afghanistan. And that message
    resonated. And Laura was the messenger, and it made such a difference to
    those ladies and women in Afghanistan who heard her voice that it, in
    return, made a great difference for her. She knows what I know: One,
    it's a honor to serve our country; and secondly, you have an opportunity
    to affect people's lives in a positive way. And that's exactly what
    she's doing.
        I want to thank Joe Pitts for introducing me. Joe is a good, strong, solid United States Congressman with a
    lot of integrity and a lot of decency, and I'm proud to serve with him.
    I just want to thank you, Joe, very much.
        I'm traveling with the United States senior Senator, Arlen
    Specter. I'm proud to be traveling with him. I
    hope he wins, and I'd like you to support him. We discarded
    Santorum somewhere up the road. [Laughter]
    Actually, he's off to York to greet us there, which is our next stop.
        I want to thank very much members of the statehouse who are here,
    particularly State Senator Noah Wenger. I'm
    honored you're here, Senator. Thank you for coming. I also want to
    thank--thanks for being here. State Senator Charlie Dent, who has tossed his hat in the ring for the United States
    Congress, is traveling today, as is congressional candidate Scott
    Paterno.

    [[Page 1268]]

    Thank you for coming, Scott, appreciate you being here.
        I know we've got some grassroots activists who are here. Those are
    the people who are actually going to turn out the vote and do all the
    work. My job is to set the vision and explain to people what I want to
    do for 4 more years. And the grassroots activists' jobs are to find
    those who are willing to vote. I think there's a lot of potential voters
    here, at least it seems like it. There was a lot of signs on the road--
    [laughter]--a lot of friendly waves. So I hope you garner them up and
    remind them that we all have a duty to do in a democracy and get them to
    the polls, turn them out, register people. We've got a web site,
    georgewbush.com, which is a place where you can sign up and get some
    marching orders and gives you something to do if you're interested in
    helping in the campaign.
        I spend a lot of time thanking people who are campaigning on our
    behalf because I know it's hard work and it takes time out of your busy
    lives. And so the first thing I want to do is, for those who are willing
    to help Dick Cheney and me, I want to thank you
    very much for what you're doing. It makes a difference. And I'm
    confident--I'm confident our work will pay off come November 2d of this
    year.
        You're probably wondering why would you--I mean, I imagine we could
    have drawn thousands of people. As a matter of fact, tonight in York, we
    are going to have a giant crowd. But why would you forgo a big crowd to
    come to this entrepreneurial haven to talk about the issues confronting
    the country? And the answer is, is because this is a perfect example of
    what I try to talk about when it comes to the economy. That's why I'm
    here. I'm here because our country's economy is strong, because the
    entrepreneurial spirit is strong. And the entrepreneurial spirit is
    alive and well in this company, see. This is a small business that
    succeeds because the owners and the fellow workers work hard to make it
    succeed. It doesn't succeed because of business--I mean Government. It
    succeeds because of the business acumen of the people running this
    enterprise.
        And so I want to thank very much the Lapp family for their
    hospitality. I am honored that you would host me today. It's not easy to
    host people called President. [Laughter] It's just about--5 buses, 4
    vans, 200 policemen, and here we are. [Laughter]
        I want to thank Greg and Tim. Those are the Lapp boys. They bought the business from
    their dad, who is with us as well, and Mom. Thank you all for being here. It was a wise decision.
    There's nothing wrong with a couple of brothers following in a father's
    footsteps. [Laughter]
        I told you one of the things I'm running for is to make the country
    stronger. A strong country really starts with having a country which
    economy is healthy. That's a strong country. If you got a strong
    economy, you've got a strong country. It means people are able to work.
        We had a tough time for a while, because the country was in
    recession. That means it wasn't growing. It means it was going
    backwards. It means employees were wondering whether or not they were
    going to be working the next day. It means small-business owners are
    wondering whether or not they want to invest capital at all. In other
    words, you don't grow unless you invest capital. People were nervous
    during the recession.
        Then we got attacked, and I'm going to talk a little bit about
    making America safer. But we got attacked on September the 11th. It hurt
    our economy. In other words, you're in a recession; then we have an
    attack. And the attack cost us a lot. It cost us dollars. It reminded us
    that the world has changed dramatically from the world that we thought
    we lived in. It was a tough moment in the history of this country. Yet
    it was a moment that we were able to overcome, because the great
    strength of America is the people of the country. They

    [[Page 1269]]

    refused to be intimidated by terrorists. The entrepreneurs of our
    country, although set back some, still had that spirit within them, the
    desire to grow their businesses and to provide employment opportunities
    for people.
        Then we discovered something else which hurt us, and that was that
    some of our citizens forgot to tell the truth, that they were given
    positions of responsibility and they weren't responsible citizens. And
    we uncovered corporate scandals. And we acted, by the way. Instead of
    wringing our hands trying to figure out what to do, we got together with
    the Congress, passed tough laws. The message is clear now that we will
    not tolerate dishonesty in the boardrooms of America, that we expect
    responsible behavior for those who are in positions of responsibility.
        And then another subject I'll talk about here in a minute: I made
    some tough decisions to defend the country, and we went to war. During a
    period of war, it's hard for the economy to grow because people don't
    feel confident. The concept of war is negative, not positive. I don't
    know if you remember, but we used to have on our TV screens ``March to
    War.'' And if you're a small-business owner or a big-business owner,
    when you're thinking you're marching to war, there's a sense of
    uncertainty with that. People don't want to invest in an uncertain
    environment.
        All these became hurdles for our economy. We overcame them. I'm
    confident one of the reasons we overcame them is because we cut the
    taxes on the people who work in America. We let people keep more of
    their own money. I say we overcame them--you'd expect me to say that;
    it's an election year. But others say it too. After all, the economy is
    strong right now. It's growing and getting stronger. Obviously, there's
    more to do, but it's growing. Listen, we added 1.5 million jobs since
    last August. That's a good sign.
        Pennsylvania's unemployment rate is 5.1 percent. That's good news
    for people who are trying to find jobs. Obviously, the unemployment rate
    can go lower. We expect it to go lower because the entrepreneurial
    spirit is strong. Manufacturing is up.
        One of the great statistics in America is the fact that more
    people--the homeownership rate in the country is the highest ever. And
    that includes amongst minority citizens. I'll tell you why that's great.
    It's because when people own something, they have a vital stake in the
    future of the country. We want people owning things in America. The idea
    of somebody owning their own home is just a fantastic part of making
    sure the future of the country is a bright and hopeful future. I mean, I
    love the idea--think about people from all walks of life being able to
    say, ``Welcome to my home. This is my piece of property. I own this.''
    And today, the homeownership rates are the highest they've been ever.
    And I know that's good for the homebuilders. It's also good for the
    homeowners. And that's a positive sign. In other words, times are good.
    But there's more we can do--there's more we can do.
        Let me tell you one of the--some of the reasons I have made the
    decisions I made on the economy. And the best way to do it is to start
    with the Lapp boys. That's
    what I call them, at least. [Laughter] When you cut taxes, it means
    people have more money to spend. And first of all, principle one is that
    it's not the Government's money; it's your money to begin with. And the
    second principle is that when you have more of your own money to spend,
    you'll demand an additional good or a service. And when you do that,
    somebody has to produce the additional good or a service. That's the way
    the marketplace works. And when somebody produces the additional good or
    a service, it means somebody is likely to find a--keep a job, and as
    those additional--as demand expands, people are going to need to expand
    their businesses--in other words, hire more people--in order to meet the
    demand. That's how I think the economy works; others do as well. As

    [[Page 1270]]

    a matter of fact, that's what the tax relief is showing us, that the
    economy works that way.
        One of the key components of economic vitality is the small-business
    sector of America. Now, two points on this. One, most small businesses,
    just like Lapp Electrical, pay individual income-tax rates. A lot of
    Americans don't know that. This company pays taxes at the individual
    income-tax rate because they are what they call a Subchapter S
    corporation. Or many small businesses are what they call sole
    proprietorships; they, too, pay tax at the individual income-tax rate.
    So when you hear me talk about cutting taxes, it is very important for
    people to connect that to small businesses. Most small businesses pay
    taxes at the individual income-tax rate.
        Secondly, most new jobs in America are created by small businesses.
    Therefore, it makes sense to put economic policy in place that
    stimulates the growth in the small-business sector. If you're interested
    in creating jobs, if you're interested in people being able to find
    work--and most new jobs are created by small businesses--it makes sense
    to have economic policy focus on small businesses. And that's exactly
    what our tax relief plan did.
        Now, there was a debate in Washington as to who ought to get tax
    relief. My attitude is everybody ought to get tax relief. If you're
    going to have any tax relief at all, the only fair thing to do is to
    give everybody tax relief. I really don't think you want a Government
    that's fixing to cut tax rates say, ``Only these kind of people deserve
    it.'' That means politics is getting to decide. Our policy said, if
    you're paying taxes, all rates are reduced. And it's helped Lapp
    Electric, and that's important.
        I'll tell you why it's important, because they've added five workers
    since January. That's what I'm interested in. I'm interested in people
    working. And so I come into this business, and the two Lapp boys say to me, ``I've added--we've
    added five workers. Your tax relief helped us. It enabled us to grow.''
    And the definition of growth is five new workers working here. And
    that's good news--guess for who: the five people that are working.
        Part of the tax relief plan also enabled people to have what they
    call bonus depreciation. In other words, it encourages people to make
    investment. And so one of the reasons I came is to try to connect
    investment to their decisionmaking to jobs. Greg
    and Tim told me they're going to invest $80,000
    this year. Part of it is because they see a better tomorrow; part of it
    is because the Tax Code said, ``If you do so, you'll get a little extra,
    a little extra help in the Tax Code.'' And they're going to buy new
    mezzanines, budget trucks, and service vans. That's called investment.
    In other words, they set aside $80,000, and they're going to do
    something with the 80,000.
        Now, the way the economy works is that as they make a purchase with
    the 80,000; somebody has to manufacture or fix up or take care of the
    product they're buying--in this case, a mezzanine or a bucket truck or a
    service van. Somebody has to make that for them, which means somebody is
    going to work as a result of the investment. So when you hear people say
    investment equals jobs, that's what that means. They're making an
    investment. Somebody has to manufacture the product that they're
    purchasing, which means as the economy grows, more people are going to
    find work. And the tax relief we passed said to them, ``If you make an
    investment, you get additional tax relief.'' That's how it works. That's
    why the tax relief we passed is so vitally important to economic
    vitality and growth.
        Remember, they're a Subchapter S corp. This is important because
    there is talk in Washington about raising taxes.
        Audience members. Boo-o-o!
        The President. Oh, yes. I know. But that's just the way they think
    over there sometimes. [Laughter] In other words, when you hear them say,
    ``Tax the rich

    [[Page 1271]]

    in order to spend for--in order to pay for bigger spending programs,'' I
    want people to think about Lapp Electrical. They're talking about
    raising the top rates; they're taxing small businesses. The economy is
    strong. It's getting stronger. Now is not the time to be taxing small
    businesses in America. Now is not the time to be raising taxes at all.
        Here's what Greg said about tax relief: ``It
    helped us pull out of the lull quicker than we would have.'' That's
    positive, isn't it? In other words, they were in a lull. It's called
    recession. Actually, in his case, it was like neutral. ``Now, we're so
    ridiculously busy,'' says Greg, ``that we need to hire more people to
    get everything done.'' That's exciting news. There's a lot of Gregs all
    over America who are ridiculously busy that they see a better future,
    that they're confident, that they're willing to invest $80,000. See,
    things are getting better in America. The spirit is strong. The great
    entrepreneurial spirit of America is vibrant, and we intend to keep it
    that way.
        With us as well is Tim King. Thanks for coming,
    Tim. Tim is sitting next to Jenna. He was a
    telecommunications technician, served in the United States Air Force,
    lost his job last year. That's hard when that happens. It's not easy,
    wondering what's going to go on. Fortunately, the economy is growing.
    Fortunately, things are such that Lapp Electric was willing to hire Tim.
    He's gainfully employed here. In other words, the tax relief not only
    encourages nice statistics, but here's a fellow here whose life, that I
    can say to you directly has been improved. He said, ``It's an excellent
    work atmosphere here. I have a larger variety of work to do.'' He's
    working here because the economy is getting better. I think he's working
    here because the tax relief we passed has made a difference in
    stimulating economic growth and vitality. I appreciate you letting me
    use you as an example, and I'm glad you're back at work. I'm glad you're
    here.
        There are about 900,000 small-business owners in Pennsylvania that
    enjoy a lower tax burden, thanks to the work we did. That's good news.
    Tax relief also has an effect on American families. A lot of times in
    Washington, we just--well, we seem to overlook what tax relief has meant
    for people. We talk about it. But what I like to do is let people's own
    stories carry the philosophy.
        Tim and Dawn Martin
    are with us today from Lancaster. Thank you for coming. I see you've got
    your two lads. I appreciate you bringing them. As you can see, they're a
    young family--Nathaniel and Ian. Because of tax relief, the Martins saved $1,700 off their
    taxes last year. Now, I know for a lot of them there in Washington,
    1,700 doesn't seem like much. Just ask the Martins what it feels like,
    though. That's what matters. It doesn't matter what people think in
    Washington. What matters is what these people think. It's their money.
    It's 1,700 more dollars in their pocket. Here's what he said. He said,
    ``It makes us feel more comfortable.'' That's important. You know,
    confidence has a lot to do with whether an economy grows. When you're
    comfortable, you're confident or more likely to be confident. ``We're
    able to put money aside for our children's future education.''
        One of the things the Martins know is that their most important duty, their most
    important responsibility as a mom or a dad, is to love their children with all their
    heart and all their soul. And I appreciate that spirit of prioritizing
    your children's education. The tax relief we passed enables them to do
    so. It makes a lot of sense.
        By the way, part of the tax relief is the fact we raised--comes from
    the fact we raised the child credit to $1,000. Part of it happened
    because we created a new 10-percent bracket, and part of it happened
    because we're beginning to reduce the negative effects of what they call
    the marriage penalty. I've always been slightly perplexed by why do you
    have a Tax Code that penalizes marriage. I mean, it seems like one

    [[Page 1272]]

    of the things that we ought to be doing in America is encouraging
    marriage, not penalizing marriage.
        All those three tax relief packages are getting ready to expire.
    See, Congress passed it, but in order to make the numbers work, they
    said, ``Well, some of it will expire.'' My attitude is that it ought not
    to expire because if it expires, it raises taxes on the people like the
    Martins. They're comfortable now. They're going to be not so comfortable
    when the Government gets back in their pocket for some of the money that
    they expect is coming their way. I'm calling on the Congress once again
    to make sure that these aspects, at the very minimum, these parts of the
    tax relief plan, remain permanent, that they don't go away, that they
    don't raise the taxes.
        No, I'm upbeat about this economy of ours. But my job is not only to
    think about today, but it's to think about what life is going to look
    like 5 years from now or 10 years from now. We have an opportunity to do
    some things today to make sure that America is the most competitive
    place in the world to do business so that people can find work. Let me
    give you a couple of ideas right quick.
        First of all, I'm concerned about what health care costs do to
    companies like Lapp Electrical. Premiums are going up. There's some
    smart things we can do. One, we have passed what's called health savings
    accounts, which will enable consumers to be able to save tax-free and
    have a better relationship--for your medical expenses--and better afford
    catastrophic care and which, by the way, will keep the link between
    patient and doctor intact.
        There is a philosophical debate going on in Washington about who is
    the best decisionmaker for health care. A lot of them up there think
    that it's the Federal Government. Of course, I don't. I think it's the
    consumers. I think it's the people. I think it's the patients that
    should be empowered to make the decisions for what is best for them.
        I believe in association health plans. This is kind of a fancy word
    for allowing small businesses to pool with other small businesses to be
    able to spread risk so that their premiums are lower for their
    employees. You can't do that today. The Federal Government needs to
    allow Lapp Electrical to team up with the equivalent in Texas so that
    there's purchasing power for small businesses. That will enable the
    owners of this business to be able to have a more affordable health
    insurance for their employees.
        Finally, I'll tell you, in order to make sure we've got reasonable
    health care costs, we've got to do something about the frivolous and
    junk lawsuits. Listen, we're too--there's too many lawsuits here that
    are running up the--these lawsuits--look, if you're hurt, you ought to
    have your day in court, no question about it. But lawsuit after lawsuit
    after lawsuit is running up the cost of medicine, and it's running
    doctors out of practice. You've got an acute problem here in
    Pennsylvania, as you know. I remember coming to your State and talking
    to doctors and hearing their stories about not being able to heal here.
    And they want to. They want to practice their trade. They want to help
    people, but they can't afford to stay.
        When I first got to Washington, I looked carefully at this issue. As
    a former Governor, I thought it was a State issue, and then I realized
    how much it cost our Federal Government. The defensive practice of
    medicine costs the Federal Government billions because of--we're
    providing a lot of money for Medicare and Medicaid and veterans' health
    benefits. These junk lawsuits are costing the taxpayers once at the
    State level and another time at the Federal level. So I decided it was a
    Federal issue and, therefore, called upon a Federal--for a Federal
    solution.
        We got it out of the House. Of course, it's stuck in the Senate--
    [laughter]--stuck in the Senate. A lot of the tort reform is stuck in
    the Senate. I don't think you

    [[Page 1273]]

    can be pro-small-business and pro-trial-lawyer. You've got to pick. I'm
    pro-small-business.
        A couple of other points I want to make right quick. In order for
    the Lapp Electricals of the world to be able to grow or any other
    business in Pennsylvania to be able to grow, we've got to have a
    reasonable energy policy. I mean, people talk to me about the
    manufacturing sector a lot, and obviously, I want manufacturing jobs to
    be--to stay here and for the manufacturing sector to grow, which it's
    now doing, by the way. But it's going to be hard for the country to
    maintain a manufacturing base if we don't have reliable supplies of
    energy. Imagine trying to run a manufacturing company with sophisticated
    equipment, and you're not certain whether or not the electricity you
    turn on is going to be available. Remember, we had a blackout, and it
    wasn't all that long ago. We need to modernize our electricity grids if
    we expect to stay competitive.
        We're very dependent on foreign sources of oil and natural gas. It
    seems like to me it make sense to encourage conservation, to use
    research and development to find alternative sources of energy, but also
    to use the resources we have in an environmentally friendly way. Listen,
    we've got a lot of coal; we need to be burning coal. We've got the
    ability to find natural gas in our own continent. We can do so in an
    environmentally friendly way. For the sake of economic security and for
    the sake of national security, this country must be wise about its
    energy policy and become less dependent on foreign sources of energy.
        We have been working on this for a couple of years. It's stuck in
    the Senate. Well, actually it's stuck in conference--that's not fair.
    But the Congress needs to get together and get a bill to my desk. They
    just need to.
        Trade is a big issue. I know people are concerned about trade.
    Here's the issue. Most Presidents prior to me agreed that we ought to
    open up U.S. markets for foreign goods. You know why? It's good for
    consumers. It's good for the American people. If you have more choice in
    products, you're bound to get better quality at better price. That's
    just the nature of the way the economy works. In other words, if there's
    more choice for consumers, prices will be better, as will quality.
        The issue really has been whether or not other countries are opening
    up their markets like we have ours. That's the issue, as far as I'm
    concerned. And so my job is to say to China, ``Open up your markets.''
    My job is to say to Europe, ``Open up your markets.'' And we're making
    progress. Just ask the farmers here in Pennsylvania what it's like in
    the farm economy today. You know why? We're selling a lot of farm
    product overseas. Look, we're good at something--we're good at growing
    things--we ought to be selling things everywhere around the world. My
    job is to say, ``Open up your markets. If ours is open, yours needs to
    be open.'' Just give us a chance to compete, and America can out-compete
    anybody, anytime, anywhere.
        And so we've got to reject economic isolationism. It just doesn't
    make any sense for the future of this economy of ours. If we want people
    working in America, let's be confident. Let's just make sure the playing
    field is level, give our workers a chance. We've got the most productive
    workforce in the world. And a fair chance to compete means America wins,
    as far as I'm concerned.
        Finally, this economy of ours is also a changing economy. I don't
    know if Tim found that or not, but there's different types of jobs that
    are now becoming available. And therefore, we better have the ability to
    train workers for the jobs which actually exist. A lot of times, we've
    got great, decent people willing to work, but they don't have the
    skillset necessary to fill the jobs of the 21st century.

    [[Page 1274]]

        I'm thinking about, for example, when I was in North Carolina seeing
    textile workers--[applause]--there you go. Thank you, sir--[laughter]--
    seeing textile workers now working in the health care field because they
    got the training necessary to change skillset. And one place to make
    sure that that is effective, that we're able to have that job training
    effectively, is at the community college system.
        Community colleges are available. They're affordable. And the best
    thing of all is they're flexible. In other words, when the health care
    system of a particular town says, ``Gosh, I need nurses,'' the community
    college ought to say, ``Let me--design the curriculum with me so I can
    train workers.'' One of the key components of whether or not we're going
    to be able to survive in the 21st century is whether we've got a
    workforce trained for the jobs of the 21st century. And that's a great
    challenge of our country. And we've got the assets in place to do it.
    I'm willing to put up money from the Federal level to see to it that the
    community college programs are vibrant and alive and active and well for
    training these good folks for the jobs which actually exist.
        So here are some ideas as to how to make sure America is
    competitive, the best place in the world to do business, the best place
    where the entrepreneurial spirit can continue to flourish and be strong.
        I also told you I want to be President again because I want to keep
    America safer. That's my solemn duty, is to protect the American people.
    It was a solemn duty that really became so evident on September the
    11th, 2001. I mean, the enemy hit us in a way that was nearly impossible
    for anybody to dream that they would attack us, using our own airplanes
    to kill thousands of innocent people, a sudden attack. It says a couple
    of things about the nature of these people. They are coldblooded
    killers. They're not religious people. They've hijacked a great
    religion. They think they're religious, but they're not. Their hearts
    are filled with evil. They are--you can't negotiate with them. There is
    no peace treaty you can sign with these kind of people. They've got a
    dim vision of the world.
        I resolved then that I will do whatever it takes to defend America.
    My duty is to do everything I can to protect our country. I called a
    good man into action named Ridge. You might
    remember him. His job is to see to it that the Homeland Security
    Department functions well, and he's doing a great job. And it's not
    easy--it's not easy. For the first-responders who are here--that would
    be your firefighters and your police and your EMS teams--I thank you for
    the job you're doing. We're all working together. We're on the
    frontlines.
        We're communicating better. We're sharing information better. We've
    now got the FBI and the CIA sharing information. We've got divisions
    within the FBI sharing information. Before September the 11th, we
    couldn't have the criminal division and the intelligence division of the
    FBI even talking to each other about certain cases. No wonder
    information slipped through the net. That's why we passed what they call
    the PATRIOT Act.
        So--by the way, let me say something about the PATRIOT Act. Nothing
    happens without court order. The same rules that we're using to catch
    drug lords is now--we're finally starting to apply to terrorists. It's
    essential that these tools stay in place if we expect to be safe.
        Anyway, I decided then and there that I'd do everything to defend
    the country, so we set up this Department of Homeland Security. But
    we've got to be 100 percent correct here at home; they've got to be
    right once. And therefore, the best way, really, to defend the country
    is to stay on the offensive, is to find these killers before they get
    here, is to use every asset we have, everything at our disposal to hunt
    down these evildoers and bring them to justice, which is exactly what I
    will continue to do as your President.
        We're making progress. Two-thirds of the known Al Qaida leaders
    are--have been

    [[Page 1275]]

    brought to justice, and we're slowly but surely, methodically, finding
    them and bringing them to justice. It's hard work, and we've got some
    really fine people working hard, really fine people. A lot of them wear
    the uniform of the United States military.
        Politicians make a lot of promises, I know, and I've tried to do
    everything I can to meet them. One of the promises I did make is that
    help is on the way. When I--2000, Dick Cheney
    and I were campaigning, we used to go to see the military--go to a
    military base or talk to military families. Our pledge was, help is on
    the way. Help has happened. Our military is strong, vibrant, skilled.
    They're getting paid better, and they're getting housed better. They're
    getting all they need, and that's what they deserve.
        Listen, I--as the Commander in Chief, I've got to be able to tell
    the husbands and wives and the moms and dads, we're doing everything we
    can, everything we can to make sure you've got what you need to help us
    do our duty, which is to protect America.
        A second lesson in all this business is that when a President says
    something, he better mean it. In order to make the world more peaceful,
    the President must speak clearly and mean what he says. I said, ``If you
    harbor a terrorist''--I said the first thing is we will find--we will
    stay on the offense and bring Al Qaida to justice. And then I said, ``If
    you harbor a terrorist, you're just as guilty as the terrorist.'' In
    other words, I was sending a message to those who felt like that they
    could maybe give Al Qaida safe haven and maybe we would just ignore it.
    But that's not how you make sure America is secure. You not only have to
    deal with Al Qaida and their affiliates and friends, but you have to say
    to people, ``Don't provide safe haven for them.'' In other words, you've
    got to keep them on the run.
        As you might recall, the Taliban in Afghanistan were providing safe
    haven for these people. We gave them an ultimatum. They, of course,
    didn't believe it. And we went in. And we went in to not only eliminate
    the training bases and the safe havens for Al Qaida, to protect
    ourselves; we also went in to liberate the people of Afghanistan from
    the Taliban.
        These people, as I mentioned to you earlier, are barbaric people.
    America weeps when they know that young girls are brutalized by a
    government. And that doesn't--that's not our value system. We care about
    human suffering. This is a compassionate country. And we also understand
    that when people are free, they're going to be peaceful.
        And so we did a couple of things in Afghanistan. One, we liberated
    the people. Secondly, we got rid of Al Qaida safe havens. And thirdly,
    Afghanistan is now on the road to democracy, and Afghanistan is an ally
    and a friend in our task to make America more secure.
        And then, as you know, I looked at intelligence and facts, and I
    came to the conclusion that Saddam Hussein
    was a threat to America. You see, because the other lesson of September
    the 11th is when we see a gathering threat, that we've got to deal with
    it--sooner, rather than later; that we can't hope that a gathering
    threat just goes away. That's the lesson of September the 11th.
        And, therefore, I went to the United Nations and said, ``Listen,
    I've looked at this intelligence, and it says he's a threat.'' I also, during my talk, reminded them that
    the guy had actually used weapons of mass destruction on his own people
    and that he had harbored terrorists. Abu Nidal is a terrorist. As you
    might recall, he killed an American. This guy Zarqawi got hospital aid there in Baghdad when Saddam Hussein was
    in power. He was the guy running a poisons factory in northeast Iraq.
    He's still in Iraq. He's the guy killing a lot of innocent people,
    ordering suiciders, bragging about it, cutting people's heads off. He's
    an Al Qaida affiliate. In other words, it was a safe haven. And the
    Congress

    [[Page 1276]]

    looked at the very same intelligence I did, the exact same intelligence,
    and came to the same conclusion: He's a threat. Interestingly enough, so
    did the United Nations.
        Remember, I went to the United Nations and said, ``We've got a
    problem here. As a matter of fact, it's such a problem that I think you
    probably have passed over a dozen resolutions saying he's a problem, and yet nothing has happened.'' And so I
    said, ``Why don't we pass one and really mean what we say.'' And so with
    a 15-to-nothing vote, the United Nations Security Council did just
    that--15 to nothing--said, ``He's a threat.'' ``Disclose, destroy, or
    face serious consequences,'' is what the United Nations said, a
    collection of nations.
        So we all felt the same thing back there. And of course, Saddam
    Hussein defied, and he just ignored what the
    free world had to say once again. Now, once you say something, you
    better mean it. At least that's the way I think. And we said ``serious
    consequences.'' We meant serious consequences. I had a choice to make:
    Either trust this madman, who clearly hated America, who had--was
    fooling around with terrorists, who had used weapons of mass destruction
    and we had thought had weapons of mass destruction--take his word for
    it, or defend the country. Given the lessons of September the 11th, I
    chose to defend the country. And that's exactly what I would do again.
    America is a more secure place because Saddam Hussein is no longer in
    power.
        The Senate is looking at intelligence failures, and should. We all
    ought to welcome an investigation about where we went right and wrong
    with our intelligence gathering. You know why? Because it's important
    for a President and the Congress to get the best intelligence possible
    in this war against these terrorists. One of the key components of
    finding out who is going to hurt us is good intelligence. And there are
    a lot of really good people working in our intelligence gathering, by
    the way--dedicated, solid, fine Americans. They too want the
    intelligence services to be as effective as possible. So I welcome their
    investigation. I really do.
        And like Members of the Senate and the House, we thought there would
    be stockpiles of weapons. We haven't found them yet. We do know,
    however, and I just want you to remember this, that the man had the
    capacity to make weapons. He had the ability to make weapons. He had the
    intent and the capability, which is why I say I would have done it
    again, because he's a dangerous person.
        The work is hard in Iraq right now. It's really hard because we're
    trying to take people from a society run by a tyrant to a free society.
    We've done this kind of work before, though. I want our fellow citizens
    to remember that. After World War II, we helped to rebuild Germany and
    Japan. And that wasn't easy. If you go back and look at the history,
    you'll find that there was articles written about how the reconstruction
    effort wasn't properly planned, why the societies were still violent,
    how maybe Japan couldn't conceivably self-govern because of its past
    history. There were a lot of skeptics and pessimists about the ability
    of liberty to have a transforming effect on societies. And I can
    understand that. It's hard work.
        But fortunately, my predecessors didn't listen to the skeptics. And
    today, I'm able to sit down with the Prime Minister of Japan and discuss key issues like North Korea. In other
    words, a former enemy--former enemies sit at a table together and say,
    ``How can we work to keep the peace,'' because there were people that
    preceded me that had great faith in the ability of freedom to change
    societies.
        The Iraqi people want to be free. We've got a good leader there
    named Allawi. He's a tough guy. He's a strong
    guy. He's dedicated to a pluralistic, self-governing society. He's
    courageous enough to get them there. He just needs America to stand by
    his side. The terrorists have got--they've got an advantage over us:
    They don't have hearts,

    [[Page 1277]]

    and we do. They kill in the hope that we--our hearts will be so full
    with sorrow, like they are every time, that we'll forget our promise and
    that we'll leave. We're not leaving. We will stand.
        Let me tell you an interesting story. I'm probably going on--am I
    going on too long? [Laughter] Either Laura or
    Jenna will give me the hook. [Laughter] Let me
    tell you an interesting story. They said that they've got some people
    from Iraq coming to see you. The door opens up in the Oval Office--
    which, by the way, is a fantastic place. It's a shrine to democracy.
    It's a powerful office. Just being in there is such an honor. And in
    walk seven people who have had their right hands cut off by Saddam
    Hussein. These were small-business guys. And
    not only did they have their right hands cut off, they had X's carved on
    their foreheads by the Hussein henchmen. The currency of the country had
    devalued, and he needed a scapegoat, so he found seven small merchants
    to blame the currency devaluation on and punished them by cutting off
    their right hands.
        I asked one guy, ``Well, why you?'' He said, well, he was a jeweler,
    and he sold dinars to buy--I think it was either dollars or euros so he
    could get gold to use as a product for his jewelry. And they round him
    up--of course, no jury, no press looking after human rights, nothing.
        He cut off seven hands off. Interestingly
    enough, a documentary was made of these seven guys, and the documentary
    was seen by a Houston newsman named Marvin Zindler. He is the--I don't know if you ever saw ``The Best
    Little Whorehouse in Texas,'' the play. He's the guy, the newsman, that
    discovered this place in central Texas--anyway, famous in Texas, at
    least. [Laughter] But he started a foundation years ago to help people.
    And he saw the story, and he flew them over.
        And so these seven guys walk in with new hands as well, because in
    Houston they had been outfitted because of the compassion of this
    American. In other words, what a contrast, isn't it, the brutality of a
    tyrant and the compassion of an individual citizen.
        And they came in, and one guy took his new hand--they're just
    learning to use their hands--and he wrote ``God Bless America'' in
    Arabic. I nearly broke out in tears right there, it was such an
    emotional--I said, ``Welcome to the Oval Office.'' I said, ``I'm glad
    you're here.'' I said, ``You don't have to worry about America. When we
    say we're going to do something, we'll do it, and we will stand with you
    so your children can grow up in a free society, which will make us more
    secure.''
        See, a free Iraq, free societies in the Middle East are in the long-
    term interest of America. In the short term, we get after them with
    every asset we got. In the long term, we defeat terror and darkness with
    the light of democracy and freedom. That's what we believe. Look what
    happened in Japan and Germany. And I'm telling you, it can happen.
        Anyway, I told these guys, I said, ``It's good you're in the Oval
    Office because I want to tell you something about our society. The
    office of the President is bigger than the person. This is a great place
    to meet because it's a chance to remind you that in your new country,
    when you've survived, the institutions you put in place will be bigger
    than the people, and therefore, your society will be stable, and you're
    more likely to be free.''
        Now, finally, I want your vote because I want to make America a
    better place--a better place. There's a lot of ways we can do so. I want
    to make sure the education system works well. I'm telling you, the No
    Child Left Behind Act is a good piece of legislation. We spent more
    money than we ever have at the Federal level. At the same time, we said
    we trust local people to make decisions for their schools, and we did
    something else that I thought was very wise. We said, ``Show us the
    results.'' For too often we'd just spend money and hope for the best,
    and guess what

    [[Page 1278]]

    would happen? Kids whose parents didn't speak English as a first
    language just get shuffled through the system--the hard-to-educate,
    inner-city kids--``Just move them through. Maybe they'll learn; maybe
    they won't.'' That's not good enough for the 21st century, and it's
    certainly not good enough for me.
        And so we've raised the bar. And we said, ``You're going to get more
    money, but now you're going to devise accountability tests to show us
    whether the kids can learn,'' to read, for example. We want every child
    reading at grade level by the third grade. That's what we want, right?
    Seems like a reasonable national goal to me. That's not too hard to ask
    in America, to say, ``How about just reading at the third-grade level?
    And if you don't, there will be remedial help, and the parents will get
    more choice.'' In other words, there needs to be accountability.
        And it's working. We've raised the bar. We're saying, ``Show us
    whether or not the kids can read and write and add and subtract.'' We're
    paying for curriculum that works. Listen, some reading programs work;
    some of them don't. You know what I'm talking about. And the best way to
    determine whether yours does is to measure. And that's what we're doing
    with local control of schools. See, we called it the No Child Left
    Behind Act. That's exactly what I mean. I don't want any children left
    behind in America. I want everybody to be able to realize their full
    potential. And so a better America is going to come when our public
    schools get better, and they are. They are.
        Another way to make sure America is a better place is to surround
    people with love. The Government is not a loving organization, however.
    [Laughter] Government is law and justice. Love comes from the hearts and
    souls of our fellow citizens. Love is found in our churches and mosques
    and synagogues. Love is found in those kind of daily acts of kindness
    that take place all the time not because of governmental law, because--
    many times because of a higher law. And it happens in America every
    single day. The strength of this country is the hearts and souls of the
    American people, and a President must understand that.
        And so we started what I call the Community and Faith-Based
    Initiative, which says we're going to open up Federal monies to
    applications for grants from faith-based organizations. I mean, if you
    want somebody to quit drinking, sometimes you have to change his heart
    and therefore change his behavior. Not every time--it doesn't have to
    happen every time. But a lot of times, if you change a person's heart,
    good chance they're going to change their behavior. And faith-based
    organizations are pretty good at changing hearts. That's why they exist,
    isn't it? And so Government must be willing to allow faith-based
    programs to access Federal money without causing the faith-based program
    to change their mission. How can you practice to be a faith-based
    program if you cannot practice your faith?
        And so what I'm telling you is, is that part of a changing and
    better America is for Government to understand--or for the person, for
    the President to understand the true strength of the country and be
    willing to rally that strength. We're going to change America one heart
    at a time, one soul at a time, because the American people are so loving
    and so caring and so decent. And one of my jobs is to call upon that
    decency and to rally the armies of compassion.
        Listen, I am honored that you came out and given me a chance to
    share with you my vision for a safer, stronger, better America. I'm here
    asking for the vote. I'm working for the vote, because I have something
    to do. I've got a reason to serve. There are things I want to do to make
    this country the greatest country it can possibly be. It's a honor to
    serve America. Thank you for coming, and may God bless you all.

    [[Page 1279]]

    Note: The President spoke at 3:16 p.m. in the warehouse at Lapp
    Electrical Service, Inc. In his remarks, he referred to Charles W. Dent
    and Scott Paterno, candidates for Pennsylvania's 15th and 17th
    Congressional Districts, respectively; former President Saddam Hussein
    of Iraq; Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, who was found dead in Baghdad,
    Iraq, on August 19, 2002; senior Al Qaida associate Abu Musab Al
    Zarqawi; Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan; and Prime Minister
    Ayad Allawi of the Iraqi Interim Government.