[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2003, Book I)]
[April 24, 2003]
[Pages 360-367]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks to Employees at the Timken Company in Canton, Ohio
April 24, 2003

    Thanks for the warm welcome. I appreciate you letting me come by to 
say hello. [Laughter] I'm honored to be in Canton, and I'm honored to be 
here at the Timken Company.
    Tim R. ``Tim'', Jr. was telling me that you all 
have been in business since 1899. Turns out that's when William McKinley 
of Canton slept in the same room I'm sleeping in. [Laughter] Tim told me 
that this is a company--they say, ``We are a roll-up-your-sleeves 
company,'' a can--it is a can-do environment, which is one of the 
reasons I've got so much optimism about the future of our economy--
because of the roll-up-your-sleeves attitude by thousands of our fellow 
Americans, because of the business sense of ``we can do whatever it 
takes to overcome the obstacles in our way.'' I know you're optimistic 
about the future of this company. I'm optimistic about the future of our 
country. It's important that Washington, however, respond to some of the 
problems we face.
    One of the problems we face is not enough of our fellow Americans 
can find work. There's too much economic uncertainty today. And so 3 
months ago, I sent Congress a package that would promote job growth and 
economic vitality. For the sake of our country, for the sake of the 
workers of America, Congress needs to pass this jobs growth package 
soon.
    And that's why I thank you for letting me come and talk to you about 
some of the problems that we face here in America. I appreciate the 
Timken family for their leadership, their concern about their fellow 
associates. They're working hard to make sure the future of this company 
is bright, and therefore, the future of employment is bright for the 
families that work here, that work to put food on the table for their 
children.

[[Page 361]]

    I appreciate so very much Jim Griffith, the CEO of the company, for setting up this wonderful 
setting for a speech. I want to thank you all for taking time out of 
your work to come and let me share some thoughts with you. I want to 
thank you for loving your country.
    I appreciate Hector Barreto, who is 
the Administrator of the Small Business Association. He's traveling with 
me today. And I named a good man to run what they call the General 
Services Administration, a fellow named Steve Perry, who learned how to be a--he's making sure that we spend 
your money wisely. And he cut his teeth right here in the Timken 
Company, and he's really a good man. He's doing a fine job.
    I appreciate the Governor of the State of Ohio for joining us today. 
Governor Taft, I'm honored you're here with us. And 
we've got Senator Mike DeWine with us as well. Mike, thank you for coming; Congressman LaTourette, Steve LaTourette, and Ralph Regula as well, from the Ohio delegation. We got members of 
the State senate. We got members of the State house. We got members of 
the city council. We got the mayor. We 
got a lot of people showing up today. [Laughter] And I'm glad they're 
here. Thank you all for taking time out of your schedules to come.
    I've just come from an interesting discussion with some of our 
fellow citizens who have joined me on the stage, the Freelands, who are 
retired citizens. They are anxious about their future. They want to make 
sure they got enough money to live out their final years. We talked 
about some of the tax relief package and what it means to their lives. 
Extra money in their pocket means that they're likely to have retirement 
security, which is something we're all concerned about.
    I met with Brenda James from Stockport, 
Ohio. She told me Stockport had 500 people, counting all the cats. 
[Laughter] And I said, ``Well, that's 200 less than Crawford--
[laughter]--counting all the cows.'' [Laughter] But Brenda is a--owns 
her own insurance company. She is a small-business owner. She is a 
representative of thousands and thousands of people who own their own 
business, part of the small-business sector, which is an incredibly 
important part of our economy.
    As well, Mike Kovach is here. He's 
from Youngstown, Ohio. Mike started his own business. It grew from 2 
people to 70 employees. A small-business owner is an integral part of 
the backbone of the U.S. economy. If you're interested in jobs and job 
creation, you better be worried about the small-business sector of 
America, and the plan I'm about to talk about addresses the needs of the 
small-business owner.
    We got Charles Parker and his wife here, 
Linda. Charles is a farmer; that's a small-
business owner. Linda works right here for the Timken Company, as does 
Pat Williams. I'll talk about Pat a little bit 
later and what this plan means for her and her family.
    Finally, Bryan Rice, of Rice's Nursery, right 
here in Canton. If you're interested in buying a plant, as the weather 
gets better and you want to improve your garden, Bryan said he's got 
some for sale. [Laughter]
    Today I had the honor of meeting Anson Park. 
Anson, you need to step out here so people can see you. Come over here. 
Anson is not hard to miss. [Laughter] I want to tell you why I want to 
introduce Anson. You know a lot of focus on America these days is on our 
military, how strong we are, how mighty we are, how powerful we are. And 
that's--it's been helpful to be mighty and powerful. But in the midst of 
the discussion of our military might, oftentimes we overlook the true 
strength of our country. And the true strength of America is the hearts 
of our fellow citizens. That's the strength of America, the compassion 
of neighbor loving neighbor.
    Anson Park is an employee of Enterprise. He's 
a volunteer in what they call the

[[Page 362]]

ASSET program with Akron Urban League, which is a mentoring program, a 
program designed to make sure that every child has a chance to succeed 
in America, a program that understands that if you're a fortunate soul, 
if you're somebody with talents to give, you're called upon to lend 
those talents to help somebody in need. Whether you become involved in 
mentoring or in your church or synagogue, in helping somebody in need, 
the definition of patriotism is to help somebody. And my call to our 
fellow Americans is, our might is more than our military; our might is 
our compassion for our fellow citizens. And I want to thank you, Anson, 
and thank thousands across America and the hundreds in this room who are 
serving your country by teaching a child to read or making sure a shut-
in gets loved or helping a boy or a girl at a Boys and Girls Clubs. The 
strength of America is the compassion of America, and I'm honored you're 
here, Anson. Thank you.
    In January of this year, I defined two great priorities for this 
Nation, priorities for my administration. First, we will confront and 
defeat threats to America wherever they gather. We have made very clear 
that we would hunt down terrorists who hate us and who want to harm us. 
And we made very clear that we would deal with the growing danger of 
Saddam Hussein and his brutal regime. The 
world now knows we keep our word.
    Our men in uniform have made us all proud; the women in uniform have 
made us all proud because they've showed incredible skill and bravery 
and decency. They have fought the enemy with fierce courage. They 
treated the innocent with compassion and respect, and they are working 
to make sure the Iraqi people are free.
    You see, the values of America understand and say clearly that 
freedom is not America's gift to the world. Freedom is God's gift to 
each and every person of the world, no matter where they live. And it 
was with that value that our soldiers are now acting in Iraq. And we're 
working to make sure America is more secure, but we're also making sure 
that the Iraqi people can be free, can run their own country, can decide 
their own fate. I know that some of you here today have a loved one 
serving in the Armed Forces. You tell them the United States of America 
is proud of your loved one's service.
    We learned a good lesson on September the 11th, 2001--I say a good 
lesson. It better be a good lesson. It was a sad day, but we learned a 
lesson, and that is that oceans will no longer protect us from the 
threats of a new era. We must have a--there's a new reality in the world 
today. We learned that lesson, but the world has also learned that this 
Nation is resolute, that we're determined. And the terrorists are 
learning that they are not safe anywhere on this Earth from the justice 
of the United States of America. Our coalition of 90 nations is still 
intact. We're still working hard. We're waging the war on terror every 
single day, and we're winning.
    And here at home, we have another great priority. We will work for a 
vigorous and healthy and growing economy so that every American who 
wants to work can find a job.
    This Nation and this economy has been through a lot. We have come 
through a recession. The first three quarters of the year 2001 were 
recessionary. They were negative-growth. We had to deal with some major 
corporate scandals. Some of our citizens forgot to tell the truth. They 
thought they could cook the books. It affected the psychology that--
their behavior affected the psychology of this country. They will be 
dealt with. Americans now know that if you try to lie, cheat, or steal 
from employees or shareholders, you will be dealt with.
    We've also seen a slowdown in the global economy. Other countries 
around the world aren't growing. We've been attacked. We fought a war in 
Afghanistan, and now we

[[Page 363]]

have finished a war--in the process of finishing a war in Iraq. And yet, 
in spite of those obstacles and difficulties, this economy is growing. 
As a matter of fact, we are growing faster than most of the 
industrialized world.
    In other words, we've overcome some obstacles because there are 
great strengths in this economy. Interest rates are low, and that helps 
people, for example, who are trying to buy a home or refinance a home. 
Inflation is low. Oil and gas prices are coming down, which helps the 
consumer. It puts more money in your pocket. The entrepreneurial spirit 
in America is healthy. It's a great strength of our country. If you feel 
like you've got what it takes to start a business, if you want to go out 
on your own, you think you've got a good product, this country says, 
``We welcome you to do so.'' This is an entrepreneurial heaven here in 
America, and that's positive for our country.
    But the greatest strength of the American economy is found right 
here, right in this room, found in the pride and skill of the American 
workforce. Last year, productivity growth in America was 4.8 percent. 
That is the best annual increase since 1980. Here at Timken last year, 
productivity rose 10 percent. Which means that America can compete with 
any nation in the world because we got the finest workers in the world.
    The high productivity that comes from steady innovation and skilled 
workers gives our economy a tremendous edge. In the mid-1980s, it took 
Timken an average of 14 worker-hours to produce a ton of alloy steel. 
Today it takes less than 4 hours. Over the long run, this kind of 
productivity makes American products more competitive, and it raises the 
standard of living for the American people. The true strength of the 
country is the fact that we're a productive nation.
    And as a result of the strengths, we're growing. But this economy 
has got unmet potential. We know this economy can grow faster, and as it 
grows faster, it will create more jobs. And we also know that the right 
policies coming out of Washington can unleash the great strengths of the 
economy and create the right conditions for growth and prosperity. And 
that's what I want to talk to you today about, what Washington can do.
    Sometimes when you hear, ``Don't worry, we're from the Federal 
Government; we're here to help,'' it makes people a little nervous. 
[Laughter] The role of Government is to create an environment in which 
capital moves freely, in which the entrepreneurial spirit is strong, 
create the conditions so that people feel comfortable about investing 
and, therefore, create the conditions for job growth.
    We're making some progress in Washington. We've got a consensus on 
an important principle: Members of both political parties now support 
tax relief. Both sides agree. Both sides understand that if people have 
more money in their pocket, they will likely spend it or invest it, 
which is good for job growth. They also understand that the money we're 
talking about in Washington is not the Government's money. It's your 
money. It's the people's money.
    And when you have more of it, it drives up demand for goods and 
services. And that's important, given the productivity increases of 
today. You see, there's pressure on employment. The more productive the 
workforce becomes--if productivity arises--rises like it's doing now, it 
means a worker can produce more. And unless there are folks willing to 
buy more goods and services, a company is not likely to hire. 
Productivity increases mean you can get by with less workers. And so the 
only way to create the conditions necessary for additional job expansion 
is to increase demand for goods and services. And the best way to create 
demand for goods and services is to let people have more of their own 
money. And that's why tax relief is important in the year 2003.

[[Page 364]]

    The debate over whether we ought to have tax relief is over. That's 
positive. Now we're talking about how big the package ought to be and 
what it ought to look like. And I've got some ideas about how big it 
ought to be and what it ought to look like. The package ought to be 
least $550 billion in size over a 10-year period in order to make sure 
that the economy grows. The package needs to be robust, so that we can 
create more than a million new jobs by the end of 2004. That's not my 
projection. That's the projection of a lot of smart economists who've 
analyzed the package. They believe that if the package is implemented by 
the United States Congress, of at least $550 billion, more than a 
million new jobs will be created by the end of '04. And that's good for 
the American worker. And that's what the whole purpose of the package 
is, to create the conditions for job growth, so people can find work.
    Some in Congress say the plan is too big. Well, it seems like to me 
they might have some explaining to do. If they agree that tax relief 
creates jobs, then why are they for a little bitty tax relief package? 
If they believe tax relief is important for job creation, they ought to 
join us and join this administration and join many in Congress and have 
a robust package that creates enough work for the American people.
    When I was campaigning and first got into office, the country's 
economy was slowing down. And then, as I say, the minute I got sworn in, 
we were in a recession. And that's why I went to Congress for a tax 
package. I said, ``We got to get the people more money so that we keep 
demand alive.'' And Congress responded, but the problem is they 
responded with a phased-in program. They said tax relief was important, 
and tax relief should be robust, but they phased it in over a period of 
years, 3 years in some cases, 5 years in others, and 7 years. Listen, 
all I'm asking Congress to do is to take the tax relief package they've 
already passed, accelerate it to this year so that we can get this 
economy started and people can find work.
    If the economy needs help now, why wait? Instead of slowly raising 
the child credit from $600 to $1,000 per child, let's do it this year 
and send the $400 for every child to the American family now. Instead of 
gradually reducing the marriage penalty, we ought to do it now. Congress 
ought to respond to the conditions of the day. They shouldn't play 
politics with job creation.
    So I hear a lot of talk in Washington about what this means. I'll 
just tell you--let me just give you the facts, and you can decide 
whether this plan is fair. If you're a family of four making $40,000 a 
year, this tax plan will reduce your taxes from $1,178 to $45--a family 
of four, $40,000.
    Pat Williams works right here for the 
Timken Company. She's a single mom. She's got the toughest job in 
America, being a single mom. [Laughter] She's got two children. 
Sheree is in college; Danielle is in high school. Under the plan I've just 
described and submitted to the United States Congress, her yearly tax 
bill would fall by nearly $1,000--every year. It's not $1,000 just this 
year. It's $1,000 every year. It's a thousand more dollars of her own 
money in her pocket. She says this: ``This will give me a little more 
breathing room so that I can assist my children as they go off and do 
better and bigger things.'' It's a beautiful statement by a mom who is 
working hard for her children.
    There are Pats all over this country who will benefit from the tax 
plan, people who are struggling to make sure their kids can go to 
college, people who want to save, people who--that thousand dollars a 
year will mean a lot. Tax relief is good for the average citizen.
    An economic plan that makes sense also must focus on small 
businesses. Small businesses create most of the new jobs in America. If 
you're interested in economic vitality like I am and like you are, there

[[Page 365]]

needs to a vibrant component of any tax plan that affects small 
business. A majority of small firms pay business taxes at the individual 
tax rate. Most small businesses pay individual tax rates. A lot of 
people assume, ``Well, they pay corporate rates.'' That's just not true. 
Most small businesses are sole proprietorships, limited partnerships, or 
Subchapter S's. So when you hear me talk about reducing income-tax 
rates, you're really hearing me talk about more capital in the hands of 
small-business owners. Reducing income-tax rates is money injected into 
the small-business sector of the American economy, that sector which 
creates most of the new jobs in America.
    Under this plan, 23 million small businesses will see their revenues 
increase because of tax relief, which means more money for investment, 
more money for growth, and more money for jobs. That's what that means.
    And the Tax Code ought to encourage small-business investment. 
Today, a small business can deduct a maximum of only $25,000 in the year 
in which they buy equipment. The proposal I submitted to the United 
States Congress says we need to triple that amount to $75,000 a year and 
index that amount to inflation. When a small business buys new 
machinery, not only does it help that small business become more 
productive and more competitive and more likely to hire somebody, it 
also means that the person who built the machine is more likely to hire 
somebody. It will have a ripple effect. The purchase of a machine has a 
ripple effect throughout our economy. It makes sense to encourage 
investment, particularly in the small-business sector.
    Mike Kovach knows that. He's from 
Youngstown, Ohio. He runs City Machine Technologies. I told you he 
started his business in 1985, and he had two employees, and now there's 
70. That's a pretty good record. He not only survived; he thrived. And 
as a result, 68 more people work, have got jobs. He pays taxes on his 
business at the individual-rate level. And he wants to make new 
investments. The proposal I've just outlined to you will save this good 
man's company $15,000 a year. And he says--let me tell you what he says 
the tax relief will mean. He says, ``That extra money helps put an 
entry-level man on my shop floor.'' And the horizons for this fella are 
limitless, is what he says. That's Mike's words, not mine. That's what 
he thinks. And since he's a decisionmaker, I take him for his word. The 
$15,000 a year means that Mike is more likely to hire one extra person. 
And if that happens all across the country, we've taken a big step 
toward making sure that people who are looking for work can find a job.
    He also understands better than some 
of us in Washington do about how this economy grows. ``Any time you can 
improve the bottom line of Main Street business''--this is Mike's 
words--``it's good for the city; it's good for the State; it's great for 
the Nation. It all trickles up, instead of trickling down.'' Now, he may 
not have a Ph.D. in economics, but he's got a Ph.D. in commonsense 
economics. And this tax plan helps people like Mike, and it's needed. 
And Congress needs to move.
    We can also promote economic growth and job creation by treating 
investors fairly. Stock dividends are often the mark of a solid and 
respectable firm and where you know the profits are real because you see 
them in cash. If you pay a dividend, the check actually shows up in 
somebody's mailbox. It means you're not a pie-in-the-sky company. You're 
not making hopeful projections, and maybe they happen, and maybe they 
don't. If you pay a dividend and you tell people you're going to pay a 
dividend, you got to deliver the dividend.
    Timken is a dividend-paying company. I say it's a dividend-paying 
company; after all, Timken has paid a dividend for the last 324 
consecutive quarters. That's a solid record. It says to me the people 
who run Timken care a lot about their shareholders and the employees. 
After all, there are

[[Page 366]]

44,000 Timken shareholders, employees, retirees, teacher retirement 
funds, college endowments, a lot of ordinary investors here in Canton 
who take great pride in owning stock in a local company.
    Right now, dividends are taxed twice. When the company makes a 
profit, the dividend--the profits are taxed, and that's good. That's the 
way it should be. However, when the shareholder receives his or her part 
of the profits, it's taxed again, and that doesn't make sense to me. 
Taxing something twice is not good public policy, particularly when 
you're worried about investment and job creation and when you're worried 
about shareholders and their ability to save and invest, and when you 
worry about retirement citizens who rely upon dividend income. The 
double taxation of dividends is bad for the citizens of this country, 
and we need to eliminate it.
    Ending the double taxation of dividends, according to many 
economists, will help the stock market. It'll create value in the stock 
market. And that's positive. After all, we're becoming an ownership 
society. Whether it be in your pension plan or directly, you own stock. 
And when the market's strong, it creates a sense of optimism. It gives 
you a sense of security. If getting rid of the double taxation of 
dividends increases the markets, it'll be good for millions of investors 
all across America. It'll be good for our economy, and it will reduce 
the cost of capital, which means companies like Timken have got a better 
capacity to expand, which means jobs.
    Ending the double taxation of dividends would be good for our 
seniors who receive half of all taxable dividend income. And that's 
important. The Freelands here--I mentioned they're retired; they receive 
dividend income. It would be helpful to the Freelands in their 
retirement to not have their dividends taxed twice.
    Ending the double taxation of dividends will be good for Timken 
workers. And that's important for you to understand. Last year, this 
company paid out more than $30 million in dividends, and a lot of that 
went to Timken employees. So when you hear politicians say the tax cut 
is only for the rich, they're talking about you. When you have more 
money to save and invest, it's good for your future. It's good for this 
economy.
    Economists estimate that ending the double taxation of dividend 
would create more than 400,000 new jobs by the end of the year 2004. And 
sooner the Congress gets this done, the sooner we'll see new jobs for 
the American people.
    When we put the job-and-growth package together, I didn't set 
arbitrary limits on tax relief. Instead, I asked, ``What does the 
economy need? How do we stimulate work? What do we need to do for small 
businesses? What will create the most jobs?'' And I concluded that of 
all the proposals that I laid out, lower taxes for families, lower taxes 
for small businesses, ending the double taxation of dividends to the 
tune of at least $550 billion, is the best way to make sure this economy 
grows.
    Now, you hear talk about deficits, and I'm concerned about deficits. 
I'm sure you are as well. But this Nation has got a deficit because we 
have been through a war. And I told the American people we would spend 
what is necessary to win the war. We weren't going to hold back so our 
soldiers were--didn't have the right equipment and the best training and 
the best possible pay.
    And we had an emergency and a recession, which affected the revenue 
growth of the U.S. Treasury. I mean, the stock market went down. Some of 
the pie-in-the-sky projections didn't make it, and the investors said, 
``Oops. The numbers weren't real.'' The investors said, ``Well, it looks 
like the days of everything is going up may end.'' And so people started 
selling, and the markets went down. That affected the revenues coming 
into the U.S. Treasury. Recession, negative growth means less revenues. 
And so, of course, we've got a deficit, but I know we can grow out of 
the deficit with wise policy.

[[Page 367]]

    And the best way to deal with the deficit is to address the two 
things that affect the deficit. First, increase revenues to the Treasury 
through economic growth and vitality. And that's what we discussed here 
today. And second, make sure Congress does not overspend your money. 
Make sure it focuses on the things that we need and doesn't spend beyond 
the things that we need. The best way to solve the deficit is to grow 
the revenues coming into the Treasury through economic vitality and have 
fiscal sanity in Washington, DC.
    And with people looking for work here in America, we have a 
responsibility to help those people find jobs. So I've asked the 
Congress to help create what we call Personal Reemployment Accounts. 
It's an innovative way to make sure that workers are helped, that they 
can help themselves. Under this program, Americans who face the greatest 
difficulties in finding work will receive up to $3,000 to use in their 
job search. And they would have flexibility in how to use that money. A 
person with a reemployment account would be able to decide whether to 
use the funds for job training or childcare or transportation or to 
cover the costs of moving to another city. If the job is attained 
quickly, within 13 weeks, the worker would be able to keep the cash 
balance that exists in the reemployment account. To strengthen the 
economy, you not only need good tax policy, but we need to help American 
workers find work and the dignity that comes with holding a job.
    The last few months have been a time of challenge for this country, 
no question about it. The resolve of this Nation has been tested, yet we 
have great resources of national character and national strength to 
overcome any challenge that we face. Our confidence and our optimism 
have never wavered. We're defending the peace of this world. We love 
peace. We use our might to make the world more peaceful. We're bringing 
freedom to corners of the world that haven't seen freedom in 
generations. We stand strong on the principle that freedom belongs to 
everybody, no matter the color of their skin, no matter what their 
religion, no matter where they live. We're building prosperity for this 
country. It's a unique moment in our history, and you're living through 
it. And as importantly, the American people are rising to meet it.
    I want to thank each of you for your strength. I want to thank you 
for your love of your country. I want to thank you for the work you do 
every day. Thanks for letting me come.
    May God bless you, and may God bless America.

Note: The President spoke at 9:56 a.m. in the Development Laboratory. In 
his remarks, he referred to William R. ``Tim'' Timken, Jr., chairman of 
the board, and James W. Griffith, president and chief executive officer, 
the Timken Co.; Gov. Bob Taft of Ohio; Mayor Richard D. Watkins of 
Canton; and former President Saddam Hussein of Iraq. The Office of the 
Press Secretary also released a Spanish language transcript of these 
remarks.