    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2002, Book II)]
    [August 22, 2002]
    [Pages 1448-1454]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at a Reception for Senator Gordon Smith
    in Portland, Oregon
    August 22, 2002

        Thank you all very much. It's great to be back in this beautiful
    State. I am honored to end my day here in Oregon by urging the people of
    this State, the good people of this State, to send this good man, Gordon
    Smith, back to the United States Senate.
        And I want to thank you all for helping him. I want to thank you for
    what you've done, and I want to thank you for what you're fixing to do,
    which is to turn out the vote, which is to go to your coffee shops, if
    you live in rural Oregon, go to your places of worship, go to your
    community centers, and remind the people of this State that you've got a
    good, honorable, decent man in Gordon Smith.
        Not only do you have an honorable, decent man, you've got an
    independent thinker who always has Oregon on his mind. I know because I
    talk to him all the time. He's reminding me about the good people of
    this State and the need to have commonsense policy.
        I also appreciate the fact that he loves his family. He's got his
    priorities straight--his faith and his family. And I am so honored that
    Sharon Smith is with us today. And I want to
    thank Sharon for coming, and I want to thank Sharon for--there she is.
    Gordon and I, we both married above ourselves. [Laughter]
        I talked to Laura today. She sent her very
    best to the Smiths. And she's not here. She's in Crawford, but she had
    just come from Leander, Texas, where they paid her the high honor of
    naming an elementary school the Laura Welch Bush Elementary School. You
    know, when I married her, she was a public school librarian. And the
    truth of the matter is, she didn't particularly care for politics, nor
    politicians. [Laughter] Then she got stuck with one. [Laughter] She's
    doing a great job. In the face of crisis, she was calm. In the--when
    there needed to be love, she provided love. And I'm really, really proud
    of the job she is doing as the First Lady of the country.
        Traveling with me today to emphasize that my words on the--up on the
    Hill were more than just words, that I intend to get something done,
    were two members of my Cabinet: Gale Norton,
    who is the head of the Department of the Interior, and Ann
    Veneman, who is the Secretary of Agriculture.
    And I want to thank them for coming. These are two fine, fine ladies who
    are doing a fantastic job. I've given them big responsibilities.
        And it might be noted that I wasn't speaking a foreign language
    today, as far

    [[Page 1449]]

    as they're concerned--they're both from the West. [Laughter] They both have a Western
    attitude about things.
        I appreciate Congressman Greg Walden for
    being here as well. I don't know if--all I can see is a hand and a
    shining head. [Laughter] But Walden is a good man. He's doing a fabulous
    job as a Congressman. He represents the Klamath Basin well. He
    represents the rural parts of your State. He understands resource
    management. He's a good fellow, and I just hope and feel good about the
    fact that his district will send him back to Washington, as they send
    Senator Smith back to Washington.
        I'm very much honored to be here with the next Governor of the State
    of Oregon, Kevin Mannix, and his wife,
    Susanna. Thank you all for coming.
        Finally, I'm so grateful that Senator Mark Hatfield and Antoinette are here.
    They're great friends of my mother and dad. They brought a lot of
    class--they're really classy people, and he set a fine example for
    future Senators, an example which Gordon Smith is following very
    closely. I like Gordon's attitude a lot. You see, he went to Washington
    to try to get things done, as opposed to pick fights. There's an
    attitude there in that town that zero-sum politics is the best for the
    country. That's not the way Gordon thinks, nor do I think, for that
    matter.
        I think it's important for the people of Portland to know that he
    goes there with not a political party in mind but with the people of
    Oregon in mind. That's what he goes to do. He goes to solve problems. He
    sees problems, and he tries to come up with commonsense solutions to
    solve those problems. And he's willing to work with his counterpart, who
    happens to be a Democrat. I saw them working together today. I saw their
    conversation and their discussion. It wasn't about how we can one-up
    each other; it was how best to work together to help Oregon. And that
    impresses me a lot. I hope it impresses the voters of this State. That's
    the kind of tone and attitude we need in our Nation's Capital.
        Today I was with a man who I believe is a true champion of the
    environment, and that's Gordon Smith. He understands that we can be
    stewards of the land, that we can put policies in place that will
    benefit the environment, and at the same time benefit people. And that's
    really important.
        I went up on the mountain today, in the midst of a burn, to talk
    about how best to prevent those burns from happening in the first place,
    how to put in place commonsense policy that says, if you let the forests
    develop kindling, nature may just cause them to burst into massive
    flames. So instead of allowing the kindling to build up, why don't we
    thin the forests? Why don't we manage the forests? Why don't we use our
    God-given talents and our technology to manage the forests, so that the
    forests are healthy for generations to come? That's common sense.
        It's a logical approach. It's a logical approach to preserving an
    incredibly important treasure. And at the same time, when we do it
    right, it will mean people are going to be able to find work. It will
    mean people are going to be able to put food on the table, which is a
    vital concern of Gordon's, and it's a vital concern of mine. Listen,
    anytime somebody who wants to work can't find work, we've got a problem,
    and we've got to deal with it in a way--this is a problem, and our job
    is to come up with solutions to solve the problems.
        You know, part of the reason why we can't get some commonsense
    forest management policies done is because there's too much redtape;
    there just is. There's too many rules and regulations all bound up to
    make sure nothing positive happens, it seems like to me. So I talked to
    our Cabinet Secretaries, and we're going to do everything we can,
    administratively, to cut through the redtape. And there's some things we
    can do. We can set priorities. We can declare emergencies. We can get
    moving on a policy that makes sense for

    [[Page 1450]]

    Oregon and for America. We've got a process now that allows people to
    tie up good policy in appeal after appeal after appeal. Listen, let me
    make this clear to everybody: We want people to be able to express their
    opinion. That's important. That's a great thing about America. People
    ought to be allowed to give their opinions on a subject. But they not--
    ought not to use that privilege to tie up good, commonsense practice
    forever, so nothing gets done except the forests are burning.
        And Gordon's an easy man to work with on this topic, because he
    understands. And I appreciate his efforts, and I appreciate him
    constantly educating, not only me but others in Congress, about how best
    to make sure that the Oregon forests are healthy and people can find
    work at the same time.
        No, he's got a good approach to Government. He also cares deeply
    about education, and so do I. We had a fantastic discussion today, by
    the way, with people from all around your State, people who came in--the
    mayor of Salem and this business lady and this educator. And one of the
    things that became clear is that the people who have got responsibility
    in your State understand the importance of education.
        We passed a good bill out of the Senate and the House that Gordon
    supported. It's a bill that says that we believe in high standards for
    every child. See, if you believe that certain kids can't learn--in other
    words, if you have low standards--that's the kind of results you're
    going to get. You're going to get results in which children don't learn.
    In other words, if you think in your mind that there are certain
    children who can't learn, the system will make sure they don't. In other
    words, low standards yields low results.
        Gordon and I understand we've got to set high standards, and we did.
    We also trust the local people to chart the path for excellence for
    every child in the State. We worked together to make sure we passed
    power out of Washington. One size does not fit all when it comes to
    public education.
        But there's one other thing in part of the bill that I'm just
    insistent upon. It makes eminent sense. See, if you believe every child
    can learn, therefore you've got to measure whether every child is
    learning. So in return for Federal dollars, we just said, ``Show us.
    Please show us whether or not children are learning to read and write
    and add and subtract. That's all you've got to do. You accept a lot of
    Federal money for title I students; just show us they're learning. See,
    we believe they can. All you've got to do is show us.'' And if they're
    not, then change. We cannot allow our children to be stuck in schools
    that will not teach and will not change.
        I want to thank Gordon for his work on Medicare. He's a leader on
    Medicare. He knows what I know. The Medicare system is an important
    system, but it's antiquated. It's old. Medicine has advanced; Medicare
    hasn't. As a matter of fact, in order to get prescription drugs
    available for seniors, it requires an act of Congress. [Laughter] It is
    so old, it requires Congress to pass a law. That's an old system. We
    need a system that adjusts to the needs of each senior. And our Medicare
    ought to include prescription drugs for our seniors. It's modern
    medicine. We want to modernize the system, and Gordon Smith is one of
    the leaders in the United States Senate on making sure Medicare is
    modernized. And I want to thank him for his leadership.
        Gordon mentioned we've got some challenges, and we do. One of the
    challenges was the fact that there was a recession. It turns out, when
    you look at the facts and the history, when I got sworn in and Dick
    Cheney got sworn in, the country was in a
    recession. We had three quarters of negative growth. And he and I
    agree--and thankfully, he was in the Senate at this point in time--that
    the best way to help a country recover from a recession is to let people
    keep more of their own money.

    [[Page 1451]]

    You see, I admit that's a philosophy that frightens some in Washington
    because they seem to forget whose money it is we spend. Some of them
    think it's the Government's money. It's not the Government's money that
    we spend; it's the people's money.
        We understand the textbook--this part of the economic textbook that
    said, if you let people keep more of their own money, they will demand a
    good or a service. And if they demand a good or a service, somebody's
    going to produce the good and service. And when somebody produces the
    good or service, somebody is more likely to find work. The tax cuts that
    Gordon Smith fought for in the Senate came at the right time in American
    history, and now what we need to do in order to make sure the
    entrepreneurial spirit is vibrant is to make the tax cuts permanent.
        You ask, ``Why aren't they permanent?'' And that's because of a
    quirk in the laws, in the rules of the Senate. This is one of these
    deals where we slash the marriage penalty. We put the death tax,
    thankfully, on the way to extinction. We cut marginal rates, which, by
    the way, benefits small businesses. Most small businesses are sole
    proprietorships or limited partnerships, and when you cut individual
    income tax rates, you provide more capital in the sector of our economy
    that creates more new jobs, and that's small businesses.
        But unfortunately, the law is such that it all comes back after 10
    years. It's kind of hard for me to explain to people in the Crawford
    coffee shop, but that's just the way it is. That's just the way it is.
    So, imagine the farmer or the rancher who's worried about inheritance
    tax driving him off the land. They start planning for this new
    inheritance, death tax repeal, and all of a sudden, it comes back into
    being. It means it creates uncertainty. And people need certainty when
    it comes to job creation and certainty when it comes to estate planning
    and certainty when it comes to their farms and ranches. For the sake of
    economic vitality, these need to be permanent, and we need to get rid of
    the death tax forever.
        We're taking aggressive steps to create an environment in which
    businesses grow. That's a difference of philosophy. See, some think
    Government create wealth. We don't think that. We think the role of
    Government is to create an environment in which the entrepreneurial
    spirit flourishes. One way to encourage the entrepreneurial spirit and
    to create jobs here in the Northwest is to aggressively seek markets for
    products manufactured and/or grown in this part of the world.
        Thankfully--and Gordon was a part of this--I was able to get trade
    promotion authority. It's an authority that had lapsed for a long period
    of time, and we fought for it and got it done. And now I want to assure
    you, I'm aggressive--going to aggressively promote U.S. and Oregon
    products in markets all around the world, for the good of our workers,
    for the good of people who work.
        And finally, we're making progress on one of the drags in our
    economy. We had some citizens in our country who decided that they were
    going to cook the books. We had some citizens who did not uphold their
    responsibilities as leaders; that they--that they were--didn't uphold
    their calling to employee and shareholder alike. They tried to cut
    corners. I signed the most comprehensive corporate reform law since
    Franklin Roosevelt was the President. And you just need to know that I
    got a Corporate Fraud Task Force in place that's going to hunt these
    cheaters down and bring them to justice, for the good of this economy.
        By far the vast, vast majority of our fellow citizens uphold their
    responsibilities. They're honest people. Their numbers are honest. But
    we're going to audit the auditors, and we're going to make sure the
    numbers are real, for the sake of economic vitality. That's what's going
    to happen here in America.

    [[Page 1452]]

        I've also got a big job besides worrying about people working, and
    that is to make sure the homeland is secure. As a matter of fact, that
    is my most important job--is to make sure an enemy which hates freedom,
    which hates America because we love freedom, doesn't hit us again. And
    we're making progress. We are. We've got a lot of people working hard.
    Anytime we get a hint of--that somebody might do something to us, we're
    moving. We've got people working overtime to secure the homeland. It's
    not only people at the Federal level, but it's people at the State and
    local level, for which I am most grateful, and I know you are as well.
        But as--last fall and the winter I began to think about how best to
    enable not only this administration but future administrations to do
    what's going to need to be done, which is to secure America. I realized
    there were over 100 agencies--over 100 agencies--involved in one way or
    another with homeland security. For those of you who tried to manage
    something, if there's 100 agencies scattered around with different
    bosses, different cultures, different priorities, it's hard to really
    bring to account; it's hard to set the priorities.
        So I said, ``Well, why don't we have a Department of Homeland
    Security?'' I proposed a new Cabinet officer that would take different
    agencies involved with homeland security and put them under one
    umbrella, so that we can have as the number one priority of these folks
    protecting you. It ought to be the number one priority. If it's our
    number one goal, it ought to be the number one priority of every agency
    in Washington, DC. So I've asked Congress to act.
        The House passed a pretty good piece of legislation. The Senate is
    now involved with the bill. I've got great support from Gordon Smith.
    However, the Senate must know loud and clear, I'm not going to accept a
    bill which is more concerned about special interests in Washington than
    the people or more concerned about their own turf than the protection of
    the American people. We want a bill--I need a bill that allows me to
    move the right people to the right place at the right time, in order to
    protect America, not a bill which tries to micromanage the process for
    the sake of special interests that are lodged in Washington, DC. I'm
    confident that Gordon understands this. I look forward to working with
    him to get a good piece of homeland security legislation to my desk as
    soon as they return from their August respites.
        Now, having said that--[laughter]--having said that, you've got to
    know that the best way to protect the homeland, the best way to secure
    freedom for the long term is to hunt the killers down, one person at a
    time, and bring them to justice. And that is what we're doing. And that
    is what we'll continue to do. And we're making some progress.
        We put this coalition together, and as you recall, I said, ``You're
    either with us, or you're with them.'' A lot of people chose to be with
    us. And I meant it. I still mean it. I still remind people that that's
    part of the doctrine of the first war of the 21st century. And we've got
    a coalition together that is working hard. We're sharing intelligence
    like never before. We're disrupting finances. This is an incredibly
    important part of this new type of war we fight. If we can deny the
    killers money, it makes it harder for them to move and plan and plot.
        We're arresting people. I bet you we've hauled in over 2,500 folks
    so far, not only just America but other countries that are--have heard
    the call. By the way, about equal the number have not been quite so
    lucky. So we're making progress. [Laughter] But we've got a lot of work
    to do. You just need to know, we've got a lot of work to do. They're
    still out there. They still hate. They don't value life like we value
    life--every life precious to America, to our culture. That's not the way
    they think.

    [[Page 1453]]

        And so, so long as I'm the President, I'm going to commit our
    resources, the resources necessary to defend our freedom. That's why
    I've asked for the largest increase in defense spending since Ronald
    Reagan was the President. I want our troops well paid and well trained.
    Anytime we commit somebody into harm's way, they deserve the absolute
    best from our Government.
        And I want the message to go to friend and foe alike: We're in this
    deal for the long haul. See, this is our freedom at stake. History has
    called this Nation into action. History has put the spotlight on the
    great beacon of freedom, and we're not going to blink. We're going to be
    a steady, patient, determined nation, doing what it takes to not only
    secure the future for our own children but the future for other
    countries' children. We cannot let terrorists get the upper hand, and we
    won't. And I want you to know--and that by being steadfast and resolved
    and, by the way, making it clear the difference between good and the
    difference between evil, by making it clear we will not let the world's
    worst leaders develop and possibly deploy the world's worst weapons, to
    try to blackmail America and our friends and allies, by being steadfast
    and strong, I believe we're going to achieve peace.
        And that's one of the great ironies for the enemy. See, they didn't
    realize who they were hitting. They thought we were weak and self-
    absorbed and materialistic and shallow, and that all we'd do maybe is
    file a lawsuit or two--[laughter]--but that's all we would do. That's
    what they probably thought. Instead, they found out that this is a
    nation that is strong and good and decent and that we're a nation that
    refuses to be cowed by a few killers. People that hide in caves and send
    youngsters to their death, that doesn't impress us at all. All that does
    is make us want to get into the cave with them and bring them out--
    that's what that does.
        They didn't understand that when it comes to defending our freedoms,
    we'll do what it takes, because we love freedom. We love the idea of
    people being able to worship freely. But see, what they really didn't
    understand is that--they didn't understand that we are determined to
    achieve peace. That's the goal. I want our children to grow up in a
    peaceful world. We might have to cross some hurdles before we get there,
    but that's where we're headed, for a peaceful world. I believe that as
    we remain strong and dedicated to fighting terror, that we can achieve
    peace not only for our own people but peace in parts of the world that
    might have quit on peace. See, I believe we can achieve peace in the
    Middle East or in South Asia.
        No, I think there's going to be incredible good that has come out of
    the evil done to America, not only abroad but here at home as well.
    People say, ``Well, Mr. President, I want to be a part of the war on
    terror. What can I do?'' And my answer is, love a neighbor just like
    you'd like to be loved yourself. If you want to fight evil, do some
    good. It is the gathering momentum of millions of acts of kindness and
    decency which define the true character of America. You see, it's when
    you go--it's when somebody mentors a child, when somebody says ``I love
    you'' to somebody who is wondering if love is possible. That's part of
    being a part of defining America. It's going to a shut-in's house and
    saying, ``What can I do to help you today?'' It's the simple act of
    loving your child every day. It's all part of the goodness that will
    come out of America.
        You see, there are pockets of despair in this country, and so long
    as one of us hurts, all of us hurts. But people in this country are
    beginning to understand that by serving something greater than
    yourself--they understand that one of us can't do everything, but one of
    us can do something to help change America, one conscience, one soul,
    one person at a time.

    [[Page 1454]]

        No, the enemy hit us. The enemy hit us. But out of the evil done to
    America is going to come not only a more peaceful world but a more
    passionate America, because Americans are understanding that the true
    definition of patriotism is not only to support a great military, but a
    definition of patriotism is to serve something greater than yourself, is
    to love your neighbor just like you'd like to be loved yourself.
        That's what's happening in this great Nation. I confidently and
    boldly predict that America will be a better country as a result of what
    was done to us, because we're a country full of the most decent,
    compassionate, strong, honorable people on the face of the Earth.
        Thank you all for coming. God bless.

    Note: The President spoke at 6:15 p.m. in the Pavilion Ballroom at the
    Hilton Portland and Executive Tower Hotel. In his remarks, he referred
    to Sharon Smith, wife of Senator Gordon Smith; Oregon gubernatorial
    candidate Kevin Mannix; Antoinette Hatfield, wife of former Senator Mark
    Hatfield; and Mayor Michael E. Swaim of Salem, OR.