[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2002, Book I)]
[June 7, 2002]
[Pages 940-942]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks Prior to a Meeting With Congressional Leaders and an Exchange 
With Reporters
June 7, 2002

Department of Homeland Security

    The President. I want to welcome Members of the Senate and the 
House, members of both political parties, to the Cabinet Room this 
morning to discuss how best to implement the strategy that I talked 
about last night, that other Members of Congress have been talking about 
for awhile, and that is the development of the Department of Homeland 
Security.
    We've got a lot of work to do to get this Department implemented. 
There's going to be a lot of turf protection in the Congress. But I'm 
convinced that by working together, that we can do what's right for 
America, and I believe we can get something done.
    To this end, I'm going to direct Tom Ridge to 
testify before Congress about the need for the establishment of this 
Cabinet agency. I feel strongly that he is the--he can represent the 
interests of the administration on the Hill, and he can bring our 
message to the Hill.
    And I look forward to working with Senators Lieberman and Specter and Members 
of the House to get this important legislation passed. Obviously, the 
sooner the debate begins, the sooner the passage of this bill can 
happen. And that's good for the country.
    Again, I want to thank the Members who are here. I want to thank you 
for your leadership on this issue. Thank you for your willingness to 
speak out about the importance of protecting our homeland.
    I'll answer a couple of questions. Yes, Ron [Ron Fournier, 
Associated Press]?

Situation in the Middle East

    Q. Thank you. If I could look ahead the next couple days, it's been 
a couple months now since you asked all the parties to step up in the 
Middle East, and there are still suicide bombings, still the incursions 
by the Israelis. Is there any hope for any progress in the next couple 
days with the President of Egypt and the Prime Minister of Israel?
    The President. Yes, I mean, we're going to have good discussions, 
and that's always important. George Tenet 
has just come back from the Middle East. Ambassador Burns is coming back from the Middle East. There's been 
consultation with all the parties. And after my meetings with President 
Mubarak and Prime Minister Sharon, I'll talk to our country about how I think we should 
move forward.
    Progress is being made. The Arab world now understands they need to 
be involved in pushing for peace and fighting against the terrorist 
actions that have--that make it very difficult to achieve a peace.
    I still am disappointed in Mr. Arafat's 
leadership. He needs to cut off the terrorist activities.
    Q. So you're talking about a speech on the Middle East?
    The President. Well, I don't know if it'll be a speech. It may be a 
discussion. It could be a paper. I haven't decided the forum.
    Q. But you'll lay out a new vision?
    The President. No. I'm going to lay out--listen, if you're 
interested to know what I think, go back to the April 4th speech.

Department of Homeland Security

    Q. Mr. President, how are you going to deal with some of the turf 
battles that come up? And what led you to change your mind about a 
Cabinet agency?
    The President. Well, first of all, I have always been--ever since we 
first got going, I've been exploring this idea. My mind was never made 
up one way or the other. I knew I needed to act right after September 
the 11th, and that's why I called upon Tom

[[Page 941]]

to serve in the capacity in which he has served. We needed to do 
something very quickly right after the attack.
    We've been exploring this idea for awhile. I've been listening to 
Members of the Congress, who have been quite articulate on the subject. 
And after doing a lot of work on the feasibility of setting up this 
Cabinet position, we decided to move forward yesterday.
    Now, in terms of turf battles, there's nothing wrong with a good 
turf-battle fight. And one way to win that argument is to call upon the 
good services of effective Members of the House and the Senate. And 
that's what this meeting is all about; it's the beginning of winning the 
turf battle.
    I think most Members of Congress understand the need to act. I know 
Members of Congress know that we're in a new type of war, and there's 
been precedent. As I talked about last night, Harry Truman moved--asked 
Congress to move, in the reforms of our war-fighting capacities, and we 
need to do the same thing for the homeland.
    And we've got Members here--if you look around this table, we've got 
Members here with plenty of seniority and plenty of stroke and plenty of 
credibility to move this package through both the House and the Senate.
    Q. Mr. President, many Americans, when they hear about this plan, 
may think it is a growth in the size of Government, in the bureaucracy, 
another layer of bureaucracy. What do you say to people who might have 
that concern, might be concerned that this is just a shuffle and 
reshuffling of the deck?
    The President. Well, I would tell them that there's going to be 
savings by--when we combine accounting units and savings when we combine 
people in place to worry about administration. You see, when you combine 
agencies that are scattered throughout the Government, there are 
inherent savings, which means that we're going to be able to have more 
money on the frontline of our homeland security.
    There is--one of the things that's important about Government is 
that there be accountability within Government. And as I mentioned last 
night, there's over 100 different agencies involved in homeland 
security. In other words, the ability to protect the homeland is 
scattered throughout, so there really is no accountability.
    I mentioned the example of Customs. You know, they collect tariffs, 
but they report to the Secretary of Treasury, who really isn't in charge 
of homeland security. And so the idea is to configure those existing 
agencies into a--that are responsible for pieces of our security into 
one agency, so that accountability is clear.
    And obviously--Harry Truman said, ``The buck stops here,'' in the 
White House. I understand that. But if that's the case, I want to make 
sure that accountability to me is clear, that we've aligned 
responsibility and authority. And so this is a very important 
reorganization to--it'll enable all of us to tell the American people 
that we're doing everything in our power to protect the homeland.
    Q. Mr. President, we were told yesterday that this would lead to no 
substantial changes at the FBI and the CIA. Since those are the two 
agencies under the most scrutiny right now, how can Americans rest 
assured that this reorganization will really do anything to address the 
root intelligence failures behind the September 11th attacks?
    The President. Well, first of all, the FBI and the CIA are changing. 
They understand that there have been gaps in intelligence sharing. If 
you listen to the testimony of FBI Director Mueller, you will understand that the FBI is making changes.
    Now, FBI Mueller came to work one 
week before September the 11th. He'd been here one week on duty. And he 
has taken the testimony of the lady, the FBI woman out of Minneapolis, very seriously. He's looked at the 
report from Arizona. And he's reacted with reform.

[[Page 942]]

    The CIA and the FBI--I've said this in many, many speeches--that is, 
if you were paying attention to them--that the CIA and the FBI now talk 
like they've never talked before. In other words, we've learned lessons 
from what took place prior to September the 11th. And so the reforms, 
they're already going on, and they're making great progress and 
communicating in a much more seamless way, in a much more--in a way that 
will help protect the homeland.
    Thank you all.

Death of Martin Burnham

    Q. Mr. President----
    The President. Yes, one question. I want to answer this. Yes?
    Q. Are you satisfied that the Philippine troops did all they could 
in the rescue attempt of the Burnhams? And have you contacted their 
family here at home?
    The President. First, let me say how sad we are that Martin Burnham 
lost his life, and I will call his parents. I'm pleased that Mrs. 
Burnham's alive; that's good.
    I talked to President Arroyo of 
the Philippines. She told me that she had called the Burnham parents, and I thanked her for 
reaching out. She assured me that the Philippine Government would hold 
the terrorist group accountable for how they treated these Americans, 
that justice would be done.
    We are obviously going to look at all the particulars and the facts, 
and the State Department will be talking about that later on today.

Note: The President spoke at 8:31 a.m. in the Cabinet Room at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt; 
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel; Chairman Yasser Arafat of the 
Palestinian Authority; Minneapolis, MN, FBI Agent Coleen Rowley; and 
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo of the Philippines. He also referred 
to Martin Burnham, an American missionary who was held hostage in the 
Philippines by the Abu Sayyaf terrorist group and killed on June 7 
during a rescue attempt; his wife, Gracia, who was held hostage with Mr. 
Burnham but rescued; and Mr. Burnham's parents, Paul and Oreta Burnham.