    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George W. Bush (2002, Book I)]
    [April 18, 2002]
    [Pages 634-638]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks on Reauthorization of Welfare Reform Legislation
    April 18, 2002

        The President. Thank you very much, Tommy. I want to thank you all for coming, and welcome to the
    people's house. Today we're here to talk about the inspiring commitment
    and persistence of Americans who left welfare for better lives. And
    we're here to talk about the compassion of American companies which
    hired them. And we're here to talk about the next actions we must take
    in welfare reform to encourage work and to encourage families.
        I want to thank Tommy for his
    leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services. I knew he was
    going to be a good one, because I saw what he did as Governor of
    Wisconsin, and he brought that very same skills of leadership and vision
    to Washington.

    [[Page 635]]

        And I want to thank another member of my Cabinet who is here as
    well, Elaine Chao. Thank you for coming,
    Elaine. She is the head of the Department of Labor.
        I want to thank Rodney Carroll, president
    and CEO of the Welfare to Work Partnership. I want to thank Rodney for
    his vision; I want to thank Rodney for his successes. I want to thank
    the dozens of welfare-to-work stories, the actual examples of people who
    made the firm and solemn commitment to work hard to embetter themselves.
    I want to thank you for your example, and I want to thank you for making
    America a better place.
        I want to thank all the company executives who are here, those who
    have made the commitment to serve their community by serving a--by
    helping a neighbor help themselves. My goal is to produce a bipartisan
    piece of legislation that will continue the good reforms of the 1996
    welfare law.
        I've invited Members of the Senate and the House here today. The
    House is working up--working on making--is getting this bill ready.
    They're marking it up, as we call--say it here in Washington. The Senate
    sent fine of its three Members, Senators Breaux, Santorum, and Bayh, and I want to thank the three United States Senators for
    joining us today. Glad you're here. You can clap for them. [Applause]
    Just remember that on the next vote. [Laughter]
        As Tommy said, welfare reform is one
    of the great success stories. I used to say it was conservative to
    change welfare; it was compassionate to help people help themselves.
    Since the law passed in 1996, welfare caseloads have dropped by more
    than half. And today, 5.4 million fewer people live in poverty,
    including 2.8 million fewer children than in 1996. That's success--
    that's success. No one can deny that that has not been a successful
    piece of legislation.
        But the real success is not found in numbers, not in--found in the
    number of caseloads cut. That's just a statistic. The real success is
    found in the number of lives which have been changed, and changed for
    the better. Real success is shown in the stories of hope and dignity, of
    hard work and personal achievement.
        On stage with me are four success stories, Tiffany Smith and Christine Anthony,
    Emory Bent and Bernadine Murphy. They are inspiring to me, and they will be
    inspiring to Americans when they hear their stories, because they are
    people who know how to persevere against tough odds and dedicated
    themselves to climbing that hill, to defeating those odds. And I'm so
    grateful that they're here, and I want to talk about two of the stories.
        Emory Bent--he was unemployed, he was
    homeless, and he was struggling with drugs. The staff at Project Renewal
    in New York provided Emory with counseling, support groups, food and
    shelter, job training and education. In other words, somebody decided
    that Emory needed some help. In Emory's words, ``Project Renewal helped
    me be a man and stand on my own two feet and be responsible for
    myself.'' Once he was hired by Home Depot, Emory said, ``I felt like I
    was a member of society.'' Emory will be completing his college degree
    this year.
        What's not said on this piece of paper and what I've discovered
    since I met Emory in the Blue Room, here in the
    White House, is that even though the program helped, he is more than
    willing to give praise to an Almighty.
        Audience members. Hallelujah. Amen.
        The President. A faith-based initiative helped as well. You see,
    when you help people change their hearts, it can help them change their
    lives. And sometimes we need a power bigger than Government or the
    private sector to help in our lives. And Emory is
    a walking testimony of what can happen.
        And then there's Bernadine Murphy of
    Chicago. She lived in a homeless shelter too. In this case, she had
    three children with her. It was just 3 years ago that she

    [[Page 636]]

    was in a homeless shelter. She also struggled with drug abuse, and her
    self-esteem was, as she put it, ``nonexistent.''
        Bernadine enrolled in a 13-week
    training program, spent 11 weeks working part time with a mentor,
    somebody who put an arm around her. In her words, ``The course made me
    feel like I was working towards something and helped me begin the long
    process of rebuilding my self-esteem.'' That's what she said. Thanks to
    the course, Bernadine moved into her own apartment, not somebody else's
    but her own, and now works at the law firm of Bellows & Bellows.
    Standing next to Bernadine when I went through the line was one of the
    partners at Bellows & Bellows. I said, ``Does she make a pretty good
    hand?'' That's Texan for, ``Is she a good worker?'' [Laughter] She said,
    ``Really good--really good.''
        Those are just two of the four stories here today, obviously
    emotional stories and true stories. But they're among the millions of
    stories that have taken place in America. They're a tribute to the
    personal effort of those who leave welfare and to the organizations
    who've helped them, as well as the businesses that hired them.
        I want to thank the Welfare to Work Partnership, which is a national
    campaign that has rounded up and encouraged over 20,000 businesses to
    provide more than 1.1 million jobs to former welfare recipients. You
    know, up here in Washington, there's a lot of talking that goes on. What
    we like to find are those who can actually deliver, and this program has
    worked. It took a lot of talking, I'm sure, to convince the businesses,
    the 20,000. But the amazing thing, is the results are fantastic.
        There is a responsibility in America if you're--if you're running a
    business. You have a responsibility to your employees; you have a
    responsibility to tell the truth when it comes to your assets and your
    liabilities--[laughter]--and you have a responsibility to be a good
    neighbor in your communities, in your cities, in your States, and in our
    country. You have a responsibility, as far as I'm concerned, and part of
    that responsibility is to give back. And one way you can give back is to
    help hire people coming off welfare.
        I urge people--I urge businesses to join the Welfare to Work
    Partnership or any like such partnership, so that they can meet and
    realize the beauty of the stories that we just heard today. It's part of
    being a good American citizen to reach out to a neighbor in need.
        We're encouraged by the results of the welfare law, but we're not
    content. There's more work to be done. We want many more stories like
    those we've heard today. And so we will continue a determined effort to
    bring opportunity and hope to all Americans, opportunity and hope in
    parts of our country where opportunity and hope does not exist. And it's
    important for Americans to understand there are pockets of despair in
    our country, and we cannot rest so long as there are pockets of despair.
        This year the 1996 welfare law must be reauthorized by Congress.
    That means they've got to pass something like it again. I propose
    spending a lot of money on welfare, to make sure that we can help people
    help themselves, spending $17 billion a year from 2003 to 2007, the same
    level it was last year. But remember, the caseloads are going down, so
    we can keep the money the same--and the caseloads are going down. It's a
    generous commitment to helping people help themselves.
        But we need to do more than just spend money. Money can help, of
    course, but money can't put hope in people's hearts. And so I want to
    talk about four goals that I think are important for the next bill.
        First, we've got to strengthen the work requirements for those on
    welfare. We've got to aim high. We've got to expect the best. Today,
    States, on average, must require work of only 5 percent of adults
    getting welfare. That's not a very high standard. I propose that every
    State be required, within 5 years, to have 70 percent of the welfare
    recipients working. We promote

    [[Page 637]]

    work because it is the pathway to independence and the pathway to self-
    respect.
        I don't think we would have seen the emotion or heard the stories we
    heard today if it weren't for a desire to have people work. Work is
    important. The welfare recipients must spend at least 40 hours a week in
    work and in preparing for work. And that's important. Because many
    adults on welfare need new skills, this plan will allow States to
    combine work with up to 2 days each week of education and job training.
    In other words, we recognize some can't immediately get into the
    workplace. I know that. But part of the work requirement has got to be
    people helping themselves through education and job training.
        People need--some people need intensive, short-term help, and I know
    that as well. And so our proposal offers 3 months in full-time drug
    rehabilitation or job training. Adolescent mothers can meet their work
    requirements by attending high school.
        But at the heart of all these proposals is that--a simple commitment
    to return an ethic of work as an important part of the American life.
        Secondly, we must encourage to work--we must work to encourage
    strong marriages and homes. Strong marriages and stable families are
    good for children, and stable families should be a central aim of
    welfare policy. We should not be afraid to promote families in America.
        Building and preserving families is not always possible; I know
    that. I understand that, but it should always be a goal. Under my plan,
    up to $300 million will be available to States to support good private
    or public programs that counsel couples on building a healthy marriage.
    It recognizes that if there's a focus on marriage, that some marriages
    can be saved.
        I also believe it's very important to make sure that we do
    everything we can to prevent unwanted pregnancies. And one way that
    works every time is abstinence. It's fail-safe. [Laughter] And it makes
    sense for the Federal Government to aim for an ideal. So in my budget,
    I've got $135 million for abstinence education programs. And not only
    will abstinence work when it comes to unwanted pregnancy, it will work
    to fight sexually transmitted diseases.
        Thirdly, we must give States greater flexibility in spending welfare
    money. Today, confusing and conflicting regulations are keeping people
    from getting help. The intent is there, but sometimes the regulatory
    world stands in between those who need help and the ability to get help.
    And Tommy and I are committed to doing
    everything we can to eliminate the bureaucratic hoops that people have
    to dive through.
        And so the proposal I've submitted that will be in law will provide
    waivers to allow States to redesign how the Federal programs operate in
    their States. Rather than dictate to States how each major welfare and
    training program should operate, waivers would allow States to be more
    innovative in providing care to low-income families. Let me put it to
    you this way. They do things a little differently in Louisiana, where
    Senator Breaux is from. And they do things
    differently than Pennsylvania or Indiana. And it makes sense to trust
    the local folks to help design the programs necessary to meet the local
    needs, and that's what we're doing.
        And finally, even as welfare proceeds, it is incredibly important
    that we encourage the work of charitable and faith-based groups to help
    people in need. America's neighborhood healers, the social entrepreneurs
    of our country, fill needs that no welfare system can possibly fill. And
    the Government ought to be the ally of the faith-based and charitable
    programs.
        We ought not to worry about faith in our society. We ought to
    welcome it. We ought to welcome it into our programs. We ought to
    welcome it in the welfare system. We ought to recognize the healing
    power of faith in our society. We ought to say to churches and
    synagogues and mosques,

    [[Page 638]]

    love--if you want to love your neighbor like you'd like to be loved
    yourself, start a program to help the homeless, to feed people.
        I support legislation--Rick Santorum is
    the sponsor in the Senate, along with Joe Lieberman--that encourages charitable giving by allowing
    non-itemizers to deduct charitable gifts, so that we can get more money
    in the hands of people who are trying to help people in need. We ought
    not to allow the Federal Government to discriminate, when it comes to
    the distribution of Federal money, against faith-based grassroots
    programs. Faith-based initiatives is an integral part of the next step
    of welfare reform, and I encourage the Congress--the Senate--to get this
    bill moving. And if there's any differences with the House, get it
    reconciled and get it on my desk. And the same on welfare
    reauthorization.
        I want to thank the Senators for being here. I want to thank the
    House Members for working on it. We need to get this done. It's for the
    good of the American people.
        You know, this is a fabulous country we have. I don't know what the
    enemy was thinking when they hit us. They must have thought all we were
    going to do was file a lawsuit or something. [Laughter]
        But we're not only going to fight evil--we're not only going to
    fight evil with a focused effort to defeat terrorism, but we're going to
    fight evil by doing some good in our country. It's the millions of acts
    of kindness and compassion which take place every single day which
    really define the America that we all know. It's those business folks,
    people in the business community, in the private sector, who said,
    ``What can I do to help? How can I help somebody?'' And when they end up
    helping somebody who's been on welfare, they realize they're more help
    than the person they're trying to help.
        And that's what this is all about. I want to thank you all again. I
    want to thank those who have had the courage to stand up and seek self-
    esteem and independence. I want to thank the--those who have been
    mentors and provided love in the darkest days of people who wondered
    whether there was any hope in our society. And I want to thank corporate
    America, those who have sat up and said, ``I'm going to be a good
    citizen. Not only am I going to provide for my shareholders and my
    employees, I'm going to provide for people who need a helping hand.''
        It's such an honor to be here today. Again, I want to thank the four
    good souls who have agreed to stand up here. Thank you for your example.
    May God bless you all, and may God continue to bless America.

    Note: The President spoke at 2:22 p.m. in the East Room at the White
    House. In his remarks, he referred to Public Law 104-193, the Personal
    Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.