[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book II)]
[September 25, 2000]
[Pages 1938-1943]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a New Mexico Coordinated Campaign Victory 2000 Reception in 
Santa Fe
September 25, 2000

    Thank you very much. First, ladies and gentlemen, let me just thank 
you for coming here. I want to thank our hosts. And thank you, 
Diane, and thank you, Bill 
Sisneros, the Santa Fe Democratic chair.
    I thank all the tribal leaders who are here. I thank your 
predecessor, Earl Potter, who is here tonight. 
Thank you very much. I'm glad to see you.
    I want to thank Congressman Udall. He's done a 
great job. He's really fun to work with, and as you can see, he's sort 
of a high-energy person. [Laughter] And he has this idea which, there 
for a few years in Washington, I was afraid was getting altogether too 
rare. He actually thinks he's supposed to go back to Washington and get 
something done for you, instead of just--[laughter]--and he's really, 
really good, and you should be very proud of him. I like him very much.
    I want to thank my friend of more than 30 years John Kelly for running for Congress and for his service as United 
attorney. And I urge you to do what you can to help him. We're just six 
seats short of being in the majority. And it makes a huge difference. 
I'll just give you an example.
    Today, before I came here, I went over to a shelter for battered 
women and troubled children and families. And we're in this big struggle 
to get the Violence Against Women Act reauthorized, which ought to be an 
absolute laydown. And we clearly have a bipartisan majority in both 
Houses for this legislation.
    But the leadership, for reasons I don't quite understand, has not 
scheduled it for a vote, and it's supposed to run out Friday night. If 
we had six more seats, it would have been reauthorized months and months 
ago. So I say to you, it's a big issue for all the New Mexico-specific 
reasons and also because your Nation needs it, I think, very clearly.
    I'd like to say more than anything else a word of thanks to a number 
of people. First, on behalf of Hillary and Al and Tipper 
Gore, I want to thank the people of New Mexico 
for sticking with us for two elections and giving us your electoral 
vote.
    And I want to say even more, thank you for how much I've learned 
about America and specific parts of America, from the people of New 
Mexico; from our friends the Sikhs, many of who were at the Indian Prime 
Minister's dinner the other night; from most especially the tribal 
leaders and those whom they represent. I was at the, you know, on the 
Shiprock Reservation not very long ago. And I think I'm the only 
American President ever to go to two Native American reservations, and I 
know I am the first President since James Monroe in the 1820's to invite 
all of the tribal leaders back to Washington to meet with me.
    And I've had liaison in the White House to the Native American 
community since the first day I became President. And I can't begin to

[[Page 1939]]

tell you what it's meant to me to try to work with you to meet the 
common challenges we face and try to help solve some longstanding 
problems and try to change the whole nature of the relationship between 
the United States and the Native American tribes.
    I want to thank Tom Udall for what he said 
about me and my friends. You know, I have to say for my friends, I may 
be the only President in the entire history of the country who was 
literally elected because of my friends. [Laughter] I mean, I had the 
lowest net worth of any President since Harry Truman when I got elected. 
And as my predecessor never tired of telling the American people, I was 
just the Governor of a small southern State. [Laughter] And when I ran, 
I was so naive, I thought it was a compliment. [Laughter] You know 
something? I still do.
    And if Bruce and Alice and John Pound really thought I was going to 
be President in 1988, they were--that's 75 percent of the people in the 
country who felt that way, my mother being the other. [Laughter] But 
it's worked out pretty well for America.
    And that's just the last thing I want to tell you. I hope you're 
proud of our party and proud of where we've come, compared to where we 
were, and proud of the fact that, if you listened to the debate, half 
the time they sound like us now. [Laughter] Or they kind of want to 
sound like us. Like they can't possibly admit that they're going to blow 
a hole in the deficit again, because being for a balanced budget and 
getting rid of this debt is now the thing to do. And I could go through 
a lot of other issues.
    But what I'd like to remind you of is that ideas have consequences. 
I think sometimes we forget that in politics. We just kind of like the 
way it feels: Somebody looks good, sounds good, got a few good moves, 
gets through a press conference all right. Ideas have consequences, just 
like they do in every other aspect of your life.
    We changed the economic policy, the crime policy, the welfare 
policy, the education policy, the health policy, the environmental 
policy, and the foreign policy of the United States. Did we make some 
mistakes along the way? Of course we did. Not everything turned out just 
the way we intended in every policy. But if you look back at every 
single one of those areas, we're stronger today and different than we 
were then.
    So people need to understand that this is a very big election. I 
hope New Mexico will stick with Al Gore and 
Joe Lieberman. It's really, really 
important. We need you.
    In the parlance of my culture, I realize I'm preaching to the saved 
here, so I won't belabor this. But I will tell you just, you know, what 
I feel, as someone who is not running for office for the first time 
since before some of you were born, in this room. [Laughter] Most days, 
I'm okay about it. [Laughter]
    But, you know, we worked so hard to turn the country around and get 
it to this point. And this is really the first time in my lifetime we've 
been in a position to build the future of our dreams for our children, 
because our circumstances are good, because we have prosperity, social 
progress, the absence of pressing domestic crisis or external threat. 
We've got a lot of problems; that's part of being alive. We'll always 
have problems as long as we're alive. And we have some big, big long-
term challenges.
    When all us baby boomers retire, there will be two people working 
for every one person drawing Social Security and Medicare. We don't want 
to bankrupt our kids, their ability to raise our grandchildren.
    We are the most racially, ethnically, and religiously diverse 
student population in our history and the biggest one by a good long 
ways, the first group of kids in the schools today, bigger than the baby 
boom generation, who need, even more than we did, a world-class 
education. We actually know now how to turn around failing schools. So 
the real issue is whether we intend to do it and what the National 
Government's role should be in that great crusade.
    Tom mentioned something about environmental problems. No one denies 
anymore that climate change is real. We just had a fresh study last week 
from a huge polar icecap that demonstrated conclusively that the 1990's 
were the hottest decade in a thousand years. Now, this could have 
enormous consequences for every farmer in America. It could, if we don't 
reverse it. I worked so hard to save the Florida Everglades, and in 30 
years, a bunch of it could be underwater. I mean, really underwater, not 
just sort of sliding along the top like today.
    How are we going to grow the economy and actually reduce the 
environmental threats? The truth is that there is on-the-shelf 
technology

[[Page 1940]]

available today that would enable us to drastically reduce our emission 
of greenhouse gases without having any impact, except a positive one, on 
our economy, and would allow us to live in more harmony with our natural 
environment--today.
    And we are very, very close, if we continue the research, to 
developing automobiles that get 80 miles to the gallon, that operate on 
fuel cells or dual-use electricity and fuel. We are quite close to a 
chemical breakthrough in biomass fuels that is the equivalent of when 
people figured out a hundred years ago how to take crude oil and crack 
the petroleum molecule and turn it into gasoline, which changed the 
whole future of the world.
    Now, the problem with all biofuels today is, it takes about 7 
gallons of gasoline to make 8 gallons of ethanol. But if we get over the 
last chemical problem, we'll be able to make 8 gallons of ethanol with 
one gallon of gasoline. And it won't just have to be corn. It can be 
rice hulls. It can be field grasses. It can be nearly anything. And when 
that happens, it will be the equivalent of 500-mile-a-gallon cars, and 
it will radically change the whole environmental future of America.
    Are we going to pursue these things or continue in denial? Or, as my 
daughter's generation says, ``Remember, Dad, it's not just a river in 
Egypt.'' [Laughter]
    This is a big issue, a huge issue. And there are lots of others. 
Ideas have consequences. In this election for President, in the 
elections for Senate and the Congress, we have different economic 
policies. We're for a tax cut. We're for investments in education and 
health care, but we believe we have to keep paying down the debt to keep 
interest rates down and economic growth high, that we were profligate, 
inexcusably, in quadrupling the national debt in the 12 years before Al 
Gore and I came to Washington. It was wrong.
    All the economic analysis I've seen indicates that the difference in 
the Republican and the Democratic economic proposal--they'll give you a 
bigger tax cut in the short run, especially if you're in an upper income 
group. And once they do that and partially privatize Social Security, 
the non-Social Security surplus is gone, long gone. We're into the 
Social Security spending again. Interest rates will be about a percent a 
year higher over 10 years. If somebody in New Mexico wants to talk to 
you about tax cuts, tell them that if the Gore plan keeps interest rates a percent lower a year for 10 
years, here's what it's worth to them in a tax cut: A percent lower 
interest rates gives you, over a decade, $390 billion in lower home 
mortgage payments; $30 billion in lower monthly car payments; $15 
billion in lower college loan payments.
    Now, if my math is right, that's a $435 billion tax cut that goes 
overwhelmingly to ordinary working folks and American families, kids 
trying to get an education, just by keeping interest rates down. There 
is a huge difference. It's hard to tell through the smoke and fire of 
the momentary campaign. This is one of the central decisions the 
American people have to make: Was I right or wrong to say, yes, we're 
going to increase our investment in education and health care and the 
environment, but we're going to keep driving this debt down and we get 
out of the deficit, then we're going to use the surplus to keep driving 
the debt down? Was I right or wrong? Is it the right or wrong course for 
America?
    Someday we'll have another recession, and we may need a big tax cut. 
We'll have to run a deficit because in recession, unemployment goes up, 
which means not as many people are paying into the Government, and 
expenses go up, which means there is more money going out.
    But when I became President, we didn't even have any tools left to 
fight recessions with tax cuts and deficit spending, because we were 
running a deficit every year of over $200 billion. This is a huge 
decision.
    Now, this State has got a lot of people, I think, who are moderate 
Republicans and independents who think of themselves as fiscal 
conservatives and may find it hard to register that even after 8 years, 
we are the party of fiscal responsibility. And it's the right thing to 
do, and it's a bigger tax cut, in lower interest rates.
    We have differences in education policy. We think we ought to help 
these States that have growing student populations with smaller classes 
in the early grades, with building new schools and modernizing schools. 
They don't believe that's the Federal Government's business. I think 
it's America's business. I think every kid that needs to be in an after-
school program or a preschool program ought to be in it. And we've got 
the money to do it, and we ought to do it.

[[Page 1941]]

    We have huge differences in health care, right? Patients' Bill of 
Rights, exhibit A: We're for it; they're not, really. Now, as we get 
close to the election and the heat turns up, they may kind of come 
across the goal line here at the 11th hour, and I'm hoping. [Laughter] 
Medicare prescription drugs: They want kind of a Rube Goldberg setup 
where we give some money to the poorest Americans and tell the rest of 
them they can buy insurance. And God bless them; I've got to give it to 
them, even the insurance companies--we fought so much over the last 8 
years, I take my hat off to them. They have been totally honest here. 
They have told the Republican Congress, ``Look, you cannot have an 
affordable private insurance program for prescription drugs for elderly 
people. It won't work. We can't do that.''
    Nevada passed a law just like the Republicans are trying to shove 
through in Congress--the exact same law. You know how many insurance 
companies have offered people above 150 percent of the poverty line 
insurance for Medicare prescription--for drugs? Zero. I tell you, with 
all the fights I've had with the health insurance companies, I want to 
compliment them. They have been scrupulously honest here. They have told 
the truth. They have said, ``There is no insurance market here. Why are 
you doing this? We don't want to look bad when we don't offer insurance 
or we've got to make the premium so high nobody can buy it.''
    But the pharmaceutical companies are against having Medicare offer a 
prescription drug benefit to all the seniors who need it. It doesn't 
make any sense, does it? They're afraid that they'll acquire such market 
power, they'll be able to get prices down to where they're almost as low 
as they are in every other country in the world. Now, this is a big 
deal. These are huge differences.
    And there are massive environmental differences. They have made a 
commitment to repeal my order setting aside 43 million roadless acres in 
the national forests. The Audubon Society says it's the most important 
conservation move in 40 years. And they are committed to reversing it. 
They said they may take away some of the national monuments I've set up. 
They say that clean air standards are too tough. We've still got a lot 
of little kids getting asthma in this country because they can't breathe 
the air.
    And goodness knows, if we haven't proved that you can clean the 
environment and grow the economy, then somebody hasn't been paying 
attention. It's good for the economy to clean up the environment. Every 
single time for 30 years we've raised the environmental standards, the 
act of raising the standards and implementing them has created more jobs 
than it's cost--every single time for 30 years. But we're still debating 
it.
    So you've got to go out across this State and say, ``Look, there's a 
different economic policy, a different education policy, a different 
health care policy, a different environmental policy. There is a 
different crime policy.'' They're against my program to put 150,000 
police on the street and have promised to get rid of it.
    Now, this is the first time ever that crime has dropped for 7 years 
in a row. We're at a 27-year low. The country is safer than it's been in 
over a quarter century. One of the reasons is that we put all those 
police on the street. They were also wrong about the Brady bill and the 
assault weapons ban. There hasn't been a single hunter in New Mexico 
miss a day of a season, not a day.
    But even if you forget about that for a minute, they actually want 
to repeal the program that is putting 150,000 police on our streets, 
that's giving us a safer--why? They say it's not the Federal 
Government's business. All I know is, when people don't feel safe--
that's that Violence Against Women Act we just did--if people don't feel 
safe, they don't have much emotional space to worry about what your 
economic policy is or your education policy or your environmental policy 
or anything else.
    So I'm just asking you to go out across this State and talk to your 
friends around the country. Every one of you know and deal with people 
who never show up at events like this, have never been to a political 
event in their lives, but they'll all be there on election day, because 
they believe in America and they want to be good citizens.
    And if people really understand the nature of the choice, we will 
win. We will win in New Mexico. We will win the Presidency and the Vice 
Presidency. John will win. We'll get the Congress 
back, and we'll keep going forward. And I just don't want to see us give 
up this.
    I worry. You know, sometimes it's harder to make a decision, a good 
decision in good times than bad times. I know people took a chance on me 
in '92. I know they got tired of hearing that--you know, they got 
worried when they

[[Page 1942]]

heard, ``He's a Governor of a small southern State, and where is it?'' 
[Laughter] It was actually a bad strategy. I mean, think how many 
thousand people there are in New Mexico from Arkansas--half of Chicago, 
half of Detroit. It was a bad strategy. If you come from a poor southern 
State where people couldn't make a living after World War II, you've got 
kin folks in 20 States. I mean, you can't lose them. [Laughter] Anyway, 
I know they were worried about it. But come on, it wasn't that big a 
chance because the country was in terrible shape. We had to do something 
different.
    Now people really do feel like they've got options. And there's not 
a person in this audience, at least who's 30 years of age or over, who 
cannot think of one time in your life when you made a big mistake, not 
because times were so tough but because times were so good, you thought 
you didn't have to concentrate. You can't live three decades or more 
without making that kind of mistake. That's what America has to avoid in 
this election. And you've got to go out and tell people what the 
differences are and what the nature of the choice is.
    When Al Gore says, ``You ain't seen nothing yet,'' that's not just a 
political slogan. I believe that. I do. I believe that with all my 
heart. I believe the best stuff is still out there. I really do believe. 
You know, I think within 10 years, measured by today's terms, we'll be 
driving cars around that get 150 miles a gallon. I believe that mothers 
will come home with their babies, after they give birth, with little 
gene cards that will tell them how to plan their future, and the life 
expectancy of newborns will be 90 years of age.
    That's what I believe. I think this stuff is going to happen. I 
think technology will lift the lives of the disabled people in this 
country to a level never before imagined. I think we'll totally re-
imagine what it means to get older. I think we'll think of people 70 and 
75 as sort of middle-aged people. They'll be out doing things, you know, 
running marathons and stuff. [Laughter] I think all this is going to 
happen. It's going to be a very interesting time, if we make the right 
decisions.
    Will there be problems? Oh, yes, there will. You'll have to worry 
about chemical and biological warfare and terrorists putting them in 
plastic containers that don't go off in airport metal detectors. There 
will be all kinds of challenges out there. There will be problems until 
the end of time. But we have a chance to make this the most peaceful, 
exciting, and harmonizing time in history.
    And I'll just close with this. I think the most important thing 
about our party is that we are not interested in asserting our inherent 
superiority over anyone. We believe in one America. I mean really 
believe in it. We're glad to have people in our country who have 
different backgrounds, different heritages, different faiths. And we 
want everybody to be proud of themselves, their tribe, and their faith--
everybody.
    But we believe the only way we can really celebrate our diversity is 
if we accept the fact that our common humanity is the most important 
fact of life on this Earth. And so we really do believe that everybody 
counts; everybody should have a chance; we all do better when we help 
each other.
    And I believe the central fact of our time is not the scientific or 
the information technology revolution. It is the growth of 
interdependence within countries and beyond national borders. We're 
getting more and more and more caught up in what Martin Luther King 
called the inescapable web of mutuality. And our party believes in it. 
That's what one America means.
    And I honestly believe that if we just keep purging ourselves of our 
fears of people who are different from us, we keep looking for common 
ground, we keep reaffirming common values, that the best is out there. 
But you have to share this sort of stuff with people in this election. 
And you just cannot assume that because we're so much better off than we 
were 8 years ago and because the case is obvious to you, that everybody 
else will be there, because remember, the better things are, the easier 
it is to stop concentrating.
    So you go out and take some time every day between now and the 
election and share this with our fellow citizens and bring us home a 
great victory.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 4:10 p.m. in the La Terazza Room at the La 
Fonda Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to hosts Brian and Rose Elgoff; 
Diane D. Denish, State chair, Bill Sisneros, Santa Fe County chair, and 
Earl Potter, former State chair, Democratic Party of New Mexico; John 
Kelly, candidate for New Mexico's

[[Page 1943]]

First Congressional District; and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee of 
India.