[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book I)]
[March 9, 2000]
[Pages 422-426]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at the One America Meeting With Religious Leaders
March 9, 2000

    The President. Thank you. Well, first of all, welcome to the White 
House. Welcome to this wonderful East Room, where Thomas Jefferson and 
Meriwether Lewis planned the Lewis and Clark expedition to explore parts 
of America no one had ever seen, to try to find an ocean that no one 
thought could be reached by land. In a way, we are here on an even 
grander expedition, to try to find a place in the human heart no one has 
ever seen, that many believe we cannot reach in this life. And so I 
thank you all for coming.
    Thank you, Sandy, for your passionate 
and vigorous leadership. Thank you, Ben Johnson, for telling me that you like your job every day. 
[Laughter] I was afraid that I had given you an impossible job, you 
would only hear from people who were disappointed in us, and that you 
would quit on me. So I'm glad you're happy, and I appreciate you.
    Thank you, Maria, for your leadership on 
this effort. And I want to thank the members of the administration who 
are here, who have been introduced. And Dr. Franklin and Judy Winston, thank 
you for being here. And I thank my good friend Congressman Amo 
Houghton for being here, for proving that this 
issue is not a partisan issue, and for being in Selma. Didn't we have a 
grand day Sunday--one of the great days of my life, and many of you were 
there.
    I was thinking, when I was in Selma Sunday and we were walking 
across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, what an important role the faith 
community of that day had in the civil rights movement. And there was an 
elderly woman there who was 90 years old, who was telling me about a 
rabbi who came to march with them. And I think it was Rabbi Heschel, but 
I'm not sure because she didn't remember, but I think that's who it must 
have been. And the rabbi had a very, very long beard, and she said, 
``You know, a lot of us thought God himself had come down to Earth to go 
with us.''
    I say that because even today, contemporary surveys show that the 
American people look to the faith community to lead us forward on this 
great journey. Some of you have a foot in both worlds, so to speak. I 
see my great friend Reverend and former Congressman Floyd Flake from New York out there. But all of you must have a 
foot in this world on this issue.
    I also want to comment that if we had had a meeting like this 35 
years ago in the White House and it had been a very inclusive meeting, 
there would have been probably--probably--African-Americans and 
Hispanics here, and European-Americans, maybe some Native Americans, 
although we were pretty tone deaf about that back then, and maybe--
maybe--one Asian-American. And all the faiths represented here would 
have been Christians and Jews and maybe Native Americans.
    Today we have a large number of Muslims; we have Buddhists here; we 
have Baha'i members here and perhaps many other faiths. I say that to 
make this point. I think you can make a compelling argument that getting 
this right in the United States and putting us in a position to play a 
role of leadership in the world is not just a racial and ethnic issue 
anymore; it is also inevitably a religious issue.

[[Page 423]]

    If you look around the world where I have been so involved--take my 
people, the Irish. There's no ethnic difference; all the differences are 
religious. Or if you look at our continuing efforts in the Middle East, 
is that an ethnic conflict or a religious one? In our attempts to 
resolve the difficulties between Greece and Turkey and on the island of 
Cyprus, is that an ethnic conflict or a religious one? When you see the 
continuing efforts to resolve the future of Tibet and the role of the 
Dalai Lama, is that a religious conflict or an ethnic one?
    I'm sure all of you have thought about this more than I have. The 
most dangerous place in the world today, I think you could argue, is the 
Indian subcontinent and the line of control in Kashmir. Is that an 
ethnic conflict or a religious one? So I think in order to understand 
this, even, and make this journey, we have to learn not only more about 
our ethnic and racial differences but our religious differences. How are 
we different? How are our world views different; how are they in common? 
How do we find a way through it all to reaffirm our common humanity?
    We know that the three great monotheistic religions that grew out of 
the sturdy but difficult soil of the Middle East all say that we're 
supposed to love our neighbors as ourselves; that if we turn aside a 
stranger, it's as if we turn aside God; that we should not do to others 
what we would not like to have done to ourselves. And we know that in 
various ways, all the faiths in this room, however they define man's 
understanding of the divine, at least recognize the fundamental 
importance on this Earth of our common humanity.
    So I hope that we will be able to talk today about what you're going 
to do, but I hope beyond that, you will be thinking today about how more 
and more of this racial and ethnic diversity, both within America and 
beyond our borders, has an inevitable religious component, and therefore 
how people of faith speak about it, behave about it, what their body 
language is, even, will have a profound impact on how this whole thing 
plays out in 21st century America.
    If you heard the State of the Union, you heard me tell the story 
about the evening we had in this very room that my wife sponsored to observe the millennium, where we had one 
of the founders of the Internet, the man who sent the first E-mail to 
his profoundly deaf wife 18 years ago, Vint 
Cerf, talking with Eric Lander, one of our human genome experts. And the beginning of 
their whole discussion was about how we could never have uncovered the 
mysteries of the human gene without the revolution in computers, because 
it made it mechanically, scientifically possible to deal with things 
that small and that diverse.
    But in the end, Lander just said, almost in passing, he said, you 
know, we're all genetically 99.9 percent the same. And if you get an 
ethnic group together, the differences among individuals within the 
group will be greater than the differences between one group and 
another, between African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and Native 
Americans. The differences within the groups, genetically, are greater 
than the group profile from one group to another. And when I said that, 
there was almost a groan in the Congress, you know, because the 
Republicans and Democrats having to recognize they were 99.9 percent the 
same--[laughter]--it made them physically uncomfortable. You know, you 
could see that they were having real trouble dealing with this. And I 
think it made them understand how others have real trouble dealing with 
it.
    But I think--one of the things I think is most interesting is how 
the advances of science sooner or later seem to confirm the teaching of 
ancient faiths, the teaching of people who maybe counted with an abacus 
and wrote in a language now long dead or had no writing at all. This is 
worth remembering.
    So I wanted to make this point to you. I mean, America would have 
never had any of its great movements for social justice had it not been 
for leaders of faith--none of them. And the same can be said of many 
other nations as well. But as we grow more diverse, our opportunity to 
do good around the world is even greater if we can be good here at home.
    But I would argue to you, we will not be able to do it unless we 
understand that this whole diversity, more than ever before, is not like 
bringing the preachers and the priests and the rabbis to help heal the 
soul of the sinful races. Now it's caught up in our entire world view 
and this multiplicity of faiths we now have in America. And we need to 
take this whole effort to a different level. And that's why I ask for 
your help--to begin with, understanding. It's hard to understand this, 
if you've never lived in a culture different from your own.

[[Page 424]]

    So, I've already talked a little more than I meant to, but I wanted 
you to be thinking about that because I think--you know, none of you are 
term-limited, except by the Almighty. [Laughter] And so you will be 
around here doing these kinds of things, presumably, when I am no longer 
President. But I will predict to you that the work of building one 
America and dealing with this diversity will more and more require a 
deeper understanding of the diversity of faiths and the understanding of 
the relationship between human nature and the divine, and how it's 
articulated and played out in life, than it ever has before to this 
day--which means your role will be even more important in the new 
century than it was in the pivotal struggles of our Nation's past.
    Thank you very much.

[At this point, the discussion proceeded.]

    The President.   I would like to say two things very briefly, 
because I want to hear more from you.
    First of all, I do think this whole issue of economic equity and 
empowerment is important. And I believe there are two elements to that. 
One is, are people who are poor being given enough support from their 
Government and from their religious institutions; the other, that I 
think is the far more important question--and one to which Mr. 
Flake, among others, has done so much--are we 
doing enough to empower the poor to support themselves and to take a 
different path to the future? And that is what this whole new markets 
effort we're making this year is designed to do. So I hope you'll be 
involved in that.
    Let me just say about the Diallo case, I tried to think of something 
to say which would be true, relevant, and wouldn't put us all in the 
position of second-guessing the jury. That is, we didn't--or looking 
into the hearts and minds of those police officers. That is, we didn't 
sit there; we didn't hear the evidence. Four African-Americans did, 
among others. So let's posit. The jury rendered a verdict, and it is the 
verdict. But the larger fact is that we all have the feeling, I think, 
that it probably wouldn't have happened, as I said, if it had been a 
white young man in a white neighborhood under the same facts.
    And so the real issue here--and again, we're getting more diverse 
now, more racially diverse. And another thing, linguistically we're 
getting much more diverse. So you're going to have people in 
neighborhoods that can't even communicate in tense situations with the 
people whose job it is to enforce the law.
    Keep in mind, this also puts more pressure on the police. A lot of 
them believe that it's not the color of their skin, it's the color of 
their uniform that causes them to be distrusted and to feel like aliens. 
So when they get treated that way, then they feel more endangered and 
more threatened, and they're more likely then to do something.
    So one of the things--I didn't say this earlier, but one of the 
things that I hope will come out of the Diallo case, if you looked at 
the powerful image his mother has made--
she's been quite a grand person, I think, the way she has tried to free 
herself of what any parent would feel, to go to the larger issues. I 
just hope that one of the things we can all do, coming out of this, is 
not only to make sure that the police forces in our diverse communities 
are themselves properly diverse. That's important, but that's not all 
there is to it, because you're never going to be having a time when 
there won't be, let's say, black police officers who have to arrest 
Hispanics and Asian police officers have to arrest white people or, you 
know, whatever it is. There's never going to be a time when you're going 
to have total racial homogeneity between the police and the communities 
they're working. So I hope that we can come out of this so that within a 
period of time, a reasonable period of time, you could all stand up and 
say, whatever happens, ``I don't believe it would have happened 
differently if the police and the person involved had, themselves, been 
of a different race.'' That's what I want you to be able to say. That's 
the big issue here.
    I wish I could bring that boy back for his mother and his friends, 
to give him the life he should have had. But I can't do that. You can't 
do that. And we can't be in a position where we second-guess a jury that 
sat there and, I believe, honestly made their best judgment. And we 
didn't hear all those facts. But we do know the larger truth, and that's 
what I hope will come out of this, a real determination--and a lot of 
you can have an impact on this in your communities, to bring the police 
and the community together and role-play this, game this out. This is a 
matter of training as

[[Page 425]]

well as tone. It's a matter of disciplined work as well as the heart.
    You know, you'd never think about sending a police force out unless 
they've trained in how to use their guns, unless they knew how to put on 
their bulletproof vests, unless they knew how to give someone their 
Miranda warnings, unless they knew these things. You have to train for 
this. This is not just a matter of having a good heart. This is work. 
This is discipline.
    How many times have you had to remind yourself of that in your own 
work? Not just enough to have good intentions, you've got to train and 
work for this.
    I've talked more about this than I meant to, but this is a big deal. 
We'll never get this race issue right unless we get the police-community 
relations issue right. And most of these police officers--listen, they 
get up every day; they put on those uniforms; and they've got their 
lives on the line. And they--most of them really do try to do the right 
thing, in a decent way and an honorable way. And we shouldn't lose sight 
of that. And we've got to train for this so that we don't have these 
Diallo-type cases again.
    Yes, sir. I promised to call on you. And in the back there, that 
gentleman.

[The discussion continued.]

    The President. Thank you. Let me be very brief here. Number one, we 
have this national effort to reduce violence against children, 
especially in the schools. And we've got a lot of things going; it's a 
subject for another moment. If you would like to be involved in it, if 
any of you would like to be involved in it, if you would give to 
Ben or Maria a card or address or something, we'll get you involved. 
We've got a lot of things going on here, because there is much more we 
can do.
    Secondly, on the perception of the United States around the world, 
first of all, I think sometimes people think we can do more than we can, 
which, when we don't do it, therefore, gives us a negative perception. 
And then sometimes, we try to do things, that if we do it in the wrong 
way, we're seen as being arrogant or high-handed. And then, we are 
having our own debates in this country, which you saw in the debate in 
the Senate over the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, for example, about what the 
role of the United States and the world should be.
    So I think that some of this misperception is inevitable. But one of 
the reasons I'm about to go to the Indian subcontinent is that I want to 
try to minimize--if people are mad at us, at least I want them to have 
an accurate perception. [Laughter] If they think we have a certain 
policy or a certain attitude, I want them to have an accurate view of 
what that policy or attitude is. And it's a constant effort, but I 
appreciate that.
    I wonder if--I promised this gentleman in the back I'd call on him, 
but we have some people here from different religious traditions, from 
East Asia or South Asia who have not spoken. I wonder if any of them 
would like to be heard before we go.
    Go ahead, sir.

[The discussion continued.]

    The President. First of all, I strongly support what was done in 
South Africa. And I have tried on various occasions to do that for the 
Japanese who were interned here during the war, for the African-
Americans that were subject to the Tuskegee experiments. And I wish you 
would work with our people, and let's try to give some shape to what 
your thinking is.
    I do believe that it's--I was thrilled that you mentioned that old 
debate between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, because when people look 
at John Adams, they sort of have this preconceived notion of what he was 
like and what Jefferson was like. You would think that Jefferson was 
arguing for passion, and Adams was arguing for reason. And it was 
actually the other way around, which is maybe just their own form of 
denial, who knows? [Laughter]
    But anyway, it was a great debate. And I agree that this is 
fundamentally a problem of the heart.

[The discussion continued.]

    The President. Thank you. Let me say, I want to have a chance to 
greet you all individually, so we're going to have to break up. I do 
want to say, Bishop, that I don't believe 
I'll ever forget that remark that without followers, a leader is just a 
person out on a walk. [Laughter] Without you and some of our friends of 
the last couple years, I would have been taking a lot of walks. 
[Laughter] So I thank you for that.
    I want to end this on a high note, if I might, since we're here 
talking about one America. After a 4-year wait, Judge Richard 
Paez, a Hispanic judge from California, of 
the Mormon faith, and Marsha Berzon were 
confirmed by

[[Page 426]]

the United States Senate today. They got the highest rating by the 
American Bar Association, and they added to the diversity of the bench. 
This week Judge Julio Fuentes of New Jersey 
was also confirmed. So I think maybe we're, by fits and starts, moving 
toward our one America. And we will work with you more.
    I look forward to seeing you all individually. Thank you very much.
    Oh, wait. We've got to have a benediction, and this is my fault. 
Tell them to stop the music. [Laughter]
    Deputy Chief of Staff Maria Echaveste.  
I would like to have Jake Swamp from the Mohawks 
lead us in closing prayer.
    The President. Thank you, sir.

Note: The President spoke at 2:30 p.m. in the East Room at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Sanford Cloud, Jr., president and 
chief executive officer, National Conference for Community and Justice; 
John Hope Franklin, former Chair, and Judith A. Winston, former 
Executive Director, President's Initiative on Race; Vinton G. Cerf, 
senior vice president of Internet architecture and technology, MCI 
WorldCom, and his wife, Sigrid; Eric Lander, director, Whitehead/MIT 
Center for Genome Research; and Bishop Chandler Owens, Church of God in 
Christ. The President also referred to West African immigrant Amadou 
Diallo, who died after being shot in the Bronx Borough of New York City 
by four police officers, who were acquitted of all criminal charges on 
February 25 in Albany, NY; and Mr. Diallo's mother, Kadiadou Diallo. Ms. 
Echaveste referred to Jake Swamp, founder, Tree of Peace Society. The 
conference was formally entitled, ``The President's One America Meeting 
With Religious Leaders.''