[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book I)]
[February 29, 2000]
[Pages 336-340]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Luncheon in West Palm Beach, 
Florida
February 29, 2000

    Thank you very much. First of all, Bren, 
thank you for your wonderful remarks and for opening your home to us 
today, giving those of us who suffered through an unusually long, cold 
Washington winter a chance to gaze out on the Atlantic under different 
circumstances, and for always being there for us.
    I also want to thank you for what you have 
done for the most important U.S. Senate candidate in the country to me. 
Hillary had a wonderful time here, 
and I thank you and the rest of you who helped her. I thank you for 
that.
    I'd like to join with Joe Andrew in 
expressing my appreciation to all the other officers of the Democratic 
Party and the Florida officials that are here. Congressman Peter 
Deutsch and Lori flew 
down with me today. We had a good time, and I was glad to be able to 
ferry them back home, for a few hours anyway.
    I'd like to thank Danny Abraham, Cynthia 
Friedman, the Carters, all the others who have 
done this fine work today, and I'd like to put in a special plug for my 
longtime friend Representative Elaine Bloom, 
who is running for Congress here. She was for me in December of 1991, 
when only my mother thought I could be elected President. [Laughter] And 
I am for her in 2000. I'm going to do what I can to help. But I thank 
you for running for Congress. Thank you.
    Let me just say a few words today about this millennial election and 
about why we're where we are. Eight years ago, when I ran for President, 
I did so because I thought Washington had become a place that was almost 
turned in on itself, obsessed with itself, and stuck in the thinking and 
the debate of a time that was long gone. It was obvious then that we 
were moving into a global economy, into a global society, that the whole 
way we work, the way we earn a living, the way we relate to each other 
and the rest of the world was undergoing a profound change. And yet, in 
Washington, we just kept repeating over and over and over again the same 
debates. Each party took the same sides, staked out the same opposite 
position. Paralysis occurred, and the results were not particularly 
satisfying to the American people.
    And so I decided that I would ask the American people to give me a 
chance to try a different approach: to try to have a politics that would 
unite and not divide; to try to have a budget policy that would restore 
basic arithmetic to the American budget and to stop pretending that we 
could ever get rid of high interest rates and low investment and slow 
growth until we got rid of the Government deficit; to put the American 
people first in profound ways, so that it would no longer be about 
Washington but about how people lived out here.
    And we've been working at it pretty steady now for 7 years and a 
month, and the results have been good. We have the longest expansion in 
history and the lowest unemployment rate and welfare rolls in 30 years, 
the lowest poverty rates in 20 years, lowest crime rates in 25 years. 
Adoptions are up. Ninety percent of our kids are immunized for the first 
time. The college-going rate's increased a lot. We've got 150,000 young 
Americans who are doing community service through the AmeriCorps 
program, 1,000 colleges with their kids out, going into grade schools 
every week to teach people to read. The country is coming together and 
moving forward. And that is the good news.
    But I think the most interesting thing about this election is, in my 
judgment, that the winner will be determined by what the election is 
about--in the President's race, in the Congress races, in the Governors' 
races. And you have to help decide what the election is about. And 
there's more latitude now because things seem to be going well, so we're 
under the illusion that there is more latitude to decide what the 
election is about.

[[Page 337]]

    I always tell people the Presidential election is the world's 
greatest job interview, except that the job interview, unlike most jobs, 
this job interview has two components. First of all, people have got to 
be able to look at you and size up, ``Can I imagine this person having 
this job?'' And then they have to decide what the job is about. And they 
are two different things. If you don't pass the first test, you don't 
get to take the second one.
    Now, I think all four of the candidates that are left passed the 
first test. The American people can look at them and imagine them being 
President. But the winner will be determined by, what is the job about? 
What is the election about; what is the charter; what do you want; what 
are we to do with this enormous amount of prosperity, this historic 
moment where we can make peace?
    Very often, democracies mishandle good times, because people are 
under the illusion that it's just sort of on automatic and it goes on 
forever. And when I gave the State of the Union Address, I asked the 
American people to work with me this year and the Congress to try to 
overcome the partisan divides and to take a long look ahead at the big 
challenges facing America. I asked them to pay the debt off, get America 
out of debt for the first time since 1835. I asked them to deal with the 
aging of America. We're going to double the number of people over 65 in 
the next 30 years.
    I released a Medicare report today that said the fastest growing 
group of seniors are people over 85. They will spend almost a quarter of 
their lives on Medicare. And since 70 percent of our seniors don't have 
access to affordable quality medicine, I'd like to see them get it under 
the Medicare program. But we also have to change the program so it will 
last longer.
    We have to lengthen the life of Social Security. I persuaded this 
Congress to save the Social Security surplus--that is the surplus that 
we get because you pay more in Social Security taxes than we pay out 
now--but I haven't persuaded them to do anything with it. So the good 
news is we're paying down the debt. But the bad news is we haven't saved 
Social Security yet. Because if they would just take the interest 
savings we get from a lower debt and put it into the Social Security 
Trust Fund, we could run it out to 2050, which would take it beyond the 
life expectancy of all but the most fortunate baby boomers. We have to 
deal with this.
    We've got to face the fact that we have the largest and most diverse 
student population in our history, and we no longer have an excuse for 
not making our schools excellent. We now know how to do it. We were 
talking the other night with the Governors, who just left town, in 
Washington. And there were a couple of people, one in my Cabinet, the 
Secretary of Education, and one retiring 
Governor, the Governor of North Carolina, 
who has the best school improvement record in America, and we were 
laughing about what it was like when we started as young men together 22 
years ago as Governors. Everybody wanted to make the schools better, but 
we didn't really know how. Now we know. We have mountains and mountains 
and mountains of evidence of what works. And the National Government 
should play a role in that. There's nothing more important than giving 
all our kids a good education. Is that going to be a part of this 
election, or not?
    We've got the crime rate down 7 years in a row. It's the lowest it's 
been in 25 years. But nobody seriously believes this country is as safe 
as it ought to be. We can make America the safest big country in the 
world. Columbine happened a year ago, and I'm still waiting for Congress 
to close the gun show loophole, to stop the importation of these large 
capacity ammunition clips, and to require child safety locks on guns.
    Today in Michigan in a school, a 6-year-old boy, with a gun that his 
brother gave him, shot a 6-year-old girl. And 
she died. The child was 6 years old. How did that child get that gun? 
Why could the child fire the gun? If we had the technology today to put 
in these child safety locks, why don't we do it? I don't know what the 
facts were in this case, and I don't want to prejudge it or condemn 
anyone. But I know this: I know that the accidental gun death rate of 
children--the accidental gun death rate of children in America is 9 
times higher than that in the other 25 biggest countries combined--
combined. So we know what to do. We just don't have any excuses. Is that 
going to be a subject of this election, or not?
    You have to decide that. And the same is true with health care. The 
same is true with the environment and whether we can grow the 
environment and improve the economy. The same is true with our 
obligations around the

[[Page 338]]

world. How do we define America's responsibility to fight biological and 
chemical and nuclear warfare, to fight terrorism, to advance the cause 
of peace, to fight against the racial and ethnic and tribal turmoil 
around the world, to advance the cause of peace through expanding trade?
    I strongly believe--and our party's divided about it, I know--but I 
strongly believe we ought to let China in the World Trade Organization. 
Everything I've learned as President and everything I've learned in 53 
years of living is that you get a lot more from people if you give them 
a chance to work with you than you do if you tell them you don't want to 
fool with them any more.
    And we've got a big stake in how China turns out. I don't know how 
they will and neither does anybody else, but I know this: If we put them 
in this trade organization, they'll have to open their markets to us 
just like our markets are open to them. So it's a no-brainer 
economically. But politically, it's important, because they will have an 
incentive to make good choices in the future about their role in the 
world. If we keep them out, they'll still keep selling stuff here, 
they'll relate more closely to others, and they'll have no incentives to 
be responsible partners in the world.
    If we do this, 20 years from now we'll wonder why we ever debated 
it. If we don't do it, 20 years from now we'll be still kicking 
ourselves. That's what I believe. So I'm going to fight for it.
    But these things ought to be the subject of this election, because 
you know the world will grow smaller, not larger. We have the lowest 
unemployment rate in 30 years, much lower than anybody thought we could 
have without exploding inflation. But there are still people and places 
that have been left behind. Should they be the subjects of this 
election?
    There are rural areas, Indian reservations, and inner-city 
neighborhoods where there are still people willing to work; where there 
is no free enterprise, no investment; where we could, by changing our 
tax laws and giving people like you the same incentives to invest in 
poor areas in America you have today to invest in poor areas in Latin 
America, in Africa, in Asia--I'm for that, by the way. I'm trying to get 
America to invest more money overseas, but we ought to have the same 
incentives to invest in poor areas in America.
    Does this matter to you? I think it should. By the way, it's not 
only morally right; it's a good way to keep the economy growing without 
inflation. There are Indian reservations in this country where the 
unemployment rate is still 70 percent. If you cut it to 20 percent, just 
to 20 percent, all those people would become consumers as well as 
workers. It's noninflationary growth.
    I'll just mention one other issue. You have to decide. I have found 
it incredibly ironic that in this most modern of ages, where I meet all 
these young people that have made fortunes in their twenties off dot-com 
companies--you know, I'm too old to make a living in this flourishing 
sector of our economy. And it is growing like crazy, you know. I just 
was at the Business Roundtable, and all these heads of these Fortune 500 
companies were trying to figure out why the Dow was going down while the 
NASDAQ was going up. And we're doing all these incredible things.
    I went in a little African village, and I saw a hookup from an 
American cable company and what they were putting in there so these kids 
could get modern maps to learn geography. I went into a favela in Rio 
with Pele, the great soccer player, and saw what an 
American company was doing there, through technology, to try to get 
these poor children in Rio a chance to have a different life. I have 
seen all these efforts to bridge the digital divide in America, all this 
neat stuff and a lot of more mundane things. I have a cousin in Arkansas 
who plays chess once a week with a guy in Australia. I mean, you know, 
it's the modern world out there.
    I know in a couple of months, I'll have an announcement that will be 
one of the great honors in my life. I'll be part of--we will announce 
that the human genome has been fully sequenced, and we can now set about 
the business of analyzing the very blueprint of life and why we turn out 
the way we do and how we deal with various things. We may be able to 
block broken genes with gene therapies to stop people from ever 
developing diabetes, to stop people from ever developing Alzheimer's, to 
stop people from ever developing breast cancer, all of these things. 
It's just going to be unbelievable.
    Now, don't you think it's interesting, with all this stuff going on, 
that the biggest problem we face as a society is still the oldest one?

[[Page 339]]

We're still scared of people who are different from us. And it's easy, 
once you are frightened or uncertain, to turn that into distrust, to 
turn that into dehumanization, to turn that into violence, and then to 
have no conscience about it because they didn't matter anyway.
    I mean, it's interesting--you look around the world, and you see 
tribal wars in Africa where hundreds of thousands of people die in a few 
days. You see continuing religious and ethnic tensions in the Middle 
East, and religious tensions continue in Northern Ireland, where I 
thought we had the door closed, and it got knocked open again. And 
what--this is outrageous--what happened in the Balkans, the problems 
they're having in Russia in Chechnya. You just look around the world, on 
any given continent.
    And in America you say, ``Well, look at us. We're the most 
successful, diverse democracy in history.'' That's true, but we had a 
shooting at a Los Angeles Jewish center, where Jewish kids were shot at 
because they were Jewish. A Filipino postal worker was killed because he 
was both Asian and a Federal employee, and the guy that killed him 
thought that was a double shot. Matthew Shepard was killed because he 
was gay. The guy in the Middle West killed the former African-American 
basketball coach at Northwestern, killed a Korean Christian walking out 
of church, and three or four other people, and he said he belonged to a 
church that didn't believe in God but did believe in white supremacy. 
And I could go on. You know all these issues.
    What I want to say to you is that times are good, but we should be 
humble about this. We should be grateful, and we should be humble, 
because we have, number one, not repealed all the laws of human nature, 
which means there is still the darkness of the heart to deal with, and 
number two, good times are either made the most of or squandered.
    And I just want to leave you with this. A lot of you here are 
younger than me, but a lot of you are about my age, maybe a little 
older. When we celebrated earlier this month the longest economic 
expansion, peace or war, in our history, I was very interested in that, 
because I love economics and I study it every month. I read all the 
numbers and everything and try to keep up with what's going on. So I 
went back and studied the last longest economic expansion in our 
history. Do you know when it was? Nineteen sixty-one to 1969, the years 
of my childhood and youth, when I should have been doing dot-com 
companies. [Laughter]
    But let me tell you about them. In 1964, the height of the 
expansion, I graduated from high school. My President had been killed a 
few months before, and the country was heartbroken. But contrary to a 
lot of the Monday morning quarterbacks that look back, it was not the 
beginning of American cynicism. That's not true. We united behind 
President Johnson. He got off to a great start. He was leading us toward 
passing civil rights legislation, legislation to help the poor. And in 
1964, when I finished high school, there was this enormous sense of 
optimism and confidence in the country that, A, the economic good times 
would go on forever; B, we would resolve in a lawful way, through our 
Congress, our civil rights challenges; and C, we would certainly 
prevail, without controversy in our country, in the cold war against 
communism. Those things would happen. Everybody thought so.
    Two years later, we had riots in our streets. The country was 
already divided over Vietnam. Four years after I graduated from high 
school, I was graduating from college 2 days after Robert Kennedy was 
killed, 2 months after Martin Luther King was killed, 9 weeks after 
Lyndon Johnson said he wouldn't run for election. And the country was 
totally divided. And there were more riots in the streets, and the 
National Capital was the scene of a riot in which block after block 
burned to the ground.
    A few months afterward, we had a Presidential election, the first 
Presidential election in modern times fought on the grounds of ``us'' 
versus ``them,'' where President Nixon, a man of immense talent, I might 
add, was elected on a theme of the Silent Majority. Now, some of you 
remember that. Now, if there's a Silent Majority, there must, by 
definition, be a loud minority, right? I was one of them; I know. 
[Laughter] So it was ``us'' and ``them.'' A few months after that, the 
economic expansion was over. And we've been having ``us'' and ``them'' 
politics ever since. And for 7 years, I have worked to end that, I think 
with greater success out here in the country than in the Capital, but 
nonetheless, it's been an honor to try.
    I'm telling you this as a citizen now, why I'm glad you're here. You 
have to help us define what this election is about. And that's what 
we're going to use your contribution for. But

[[Page 340]]

those of you who are older, like me, you remember what it was like in 
the mid-sixties. As a citizen, I have waited for 35 years for my country 
to be in a position to build the future of our dreams for our children. 
That's what this is about. It's not just about choosing a person. We 
have to define the job and the direction. Then the choice will take care 
of itself. You know what I think. But just remember how quickly these 
things can get away and what a heavy responsibility we have to make the 
most of a truly magic moment.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 2:10 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to Bren Simon, Danny Abraham, Cynthia Friedman, and 
John and Nancy Carter, luncheon cohosts; Joseph J. Andrew, national 
chair, Democratic National Committee; Lori Deutsch, wife of 
Representative Peter Deutsch; Gov. James B. Hunt, Jr., of North 
Carolina; 6-year-old Kayla Rolland, who died after she was shot by 6-
year-old classmate Dedrick Owens at Theo J. Buell Elementary School in 
Mount Morris Township, MI; and former professional soccer player Pele, 
Minister of Extraordinary Sports of Brazil.