[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book I)]
[February 14, 2000]
[Pages 245-252]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]
Interview With Wolf Blitzer on CNN.com
February 14, 2000
2000 Presidential Election
Mr. Blitzer. Thank you very much, Lou. We are in the Oval Office
here with President Clinton. Mr. Clinton, thank you so much for doing
this historic, first-ever on-line news interview with CNN.com.
I just want to set the scene for you and for our audience. This is
not only being put forward on CNN.com and other Internet users, but also
it will be seen simultaneously on CNN and CNN International. Fifteen
minutes after we're completed, there will be an on-line video that
people will be able to see, whenever, if they missed it. There will also
be a transcript. They will be able to stream and see this as it goes on,
on the Internet. So it's a historic moment for the new technology.
I know you've been fascinated by this, so let's get right at it. We
have some E-mail questions. First one from Frank Williams in Tinley
Park, Illinois: Mr. President, understandably, you're supporting the
Presidential candidacy of Vice President Al Gore. But please share your
personal political opinions of Senator John McCain and Governor George
W. Bush.
The President. I think I should pass on that. I think--I've tried to
stay out of this Presidential election. I'm not a candidate, and I don't
think any headlines that I make should interfere with the ability of
Senator McCain or Governor Bush to make their point. They're going to have an election in
South Carolina, and then they'll go on to other States. And I think
that--and at some point it might become appropriate for me to say
something, maybe at the Democratic Convention or something, or if they
make a specific statement about my administration or my record.
But I really believe that the American people--this is their year,
their time. And I am going to vote for the Vice President, and I do support him, because I think he's been the best
Vice President in our history by far. And I think he's got a good
program for the American people, and I know him to be a good man who
will make good decisions.
But I just don't think I should get in the middle of this
Presidential race. It only interferes with the voters' ability to draw
their own conclusions. And I trust them; they almost always get it
right.
Mr. Blitzer. But you do know Senator McCain and Governor Bush?
The President. Sure.
Mr. Blitzer. You've met them, and you have your own opinions of both
of them.
The President. I do, and I follow this campaign closely. I'm
interested. It's the first time in over 20 years when I've just been an
onlooker, so it's been fascinating to me as a citizen. But I don't think
that I should say anything right now. And I don't mean to dodge the
gentleman's question, but I just think that
anything I do would only complicate their lives. And they're making
their case to the people, and they're arguing with each other as they
should be. And that's the way it ought to be done right now.
Hillary Clinton's Senate Campaign
Mr. Blitzer. All right, we have another E-mail question from Peggy
Brown: Do you find it difficult, Mr. President, watching, listening to
criticisms of the First Lady as she attempts to capture the Senate seat
in New York?
The President. Sure. I mean, of course, I do. I now know how she
felt all those years. You know, I love her very much, and I think--I
know her better than anybody else, and I believe she'd be a great public
official. And I hope the people of New York will put her to work.
[[Page 246]]
But if she's criticized, particularly if somebody says something I know
is flatout wrong, it drives me nuts. I want to be able to say, ``Gosh, I
wish I could answer that one.''
Middle East Peace Process
Mr. Blitzer. All right. We have a chat room that's going on even as
we speak right now. There's a question from one person: Are you
optimistic, Mr. President, about the future for Middle East peace?
The President. Yes, I am. This is--we're in a little tough patch
right now, because a lot of things are going on in the Middle East, the
trouble in Lebanon right now. And we're down to the last strokes, if you
will. We're down to the hard decisions. But I believe it is so clearly
in the interests of the long-term security of Israel and the long-term
interests of the Palestinians and the Syrians and the Lebanese to have a
comprehensive peace. And I think we're so close on the substance that I
am optimistic.
Now, it will require courage. And it will require courage not just
by the leaders, but the people of those countries have to recognize that
you cannot make peace unless you're willing to give as well as to get.
But they ought to do it, and they ought to do it sooner rather than
later. I think that the longer you delay something like this, when you
have a moment of opportunity, the more you put it at risk. But I am
basically optimistic.
Mr. Blitzer. You've invested a lot of your personal time and energy
in the Israeli-Palestinian and the Israeli-Syrian peace process. Is it
time for you, once again, to personally get involved and bring the
parties together, do something to make sure this opportunity is not
lost?
The President. Well, I am personally involved, even when I'm not in
a public way. I'm always on the phone, always working this issue. But I
think that there will have to be some forward progress here in the next
few weeks, and I'll do whatever I can to facilitate it in whatever way I
can. But beyond that, I don't want to say anything right now. We're
working it, and the parties are working it.
Internet Security
Mr. Blitzer. Okay. Let's take another question from an E-mail that
we received: Do you think, Mr. President, the Federal Government could
do more for Internet security? I know you have a big conference, a big
meeting coming up here at the White House tomorrow to deal with this
sensitive issue, especially given the hacker problem that we saw in the
last few weeks.
The President. Well, the short answer to that is, we probably can.
And I'm bringing in a group of people to meet with me tomorrow, a lot of
people from the high-tech community and from all our Government
agencies. These denial-of-service attacks are obviously very disturbing,
and I think there is a way that we can clearly promote security.
I think it's important that the American people not overreact to
this. That is, we're into a whole new world with the Internet, and
whenever we sort of cross another plateau in our development, there are
those who seek to take advantage of it. So this is a replay of things
that have happened throughout our history, and we'll figure out how to
do it and go forward.
But I think on balance, no one could dispute what a great thing the
Internet has been for our country and for the world. There are now over
200 million people that use it every day, about half of them here in the
United States. And we just need to keep pushing it.
National Economy
Mr. Blitzer. And we're using it right now. Let's take another
question from our chat room, from our CNN.com chat room: Mr. President,
how will you advise Vice President Gore to keep this economy growing?
The President. Well, I think he's got a
pretty good idea because he's been here with us and has been part of all
the decisions that have been made the last 7 years. But if you look at
where we are, the question is--we have the longest economic expansion in
history; how do we keep it going?
I think we need to remember the fundamentals. We need to keep the
debt being paid down, because that allows people in the private sector
to borrow money not only to invest in new businesses or in their
existing business but also to purchase things. So the continuing debt
repayment is important. Keeping our markets open, to make us competitive
and keep inflation down, is important. Investing in science and
technology and research and in education and training and closing the
digital divide to make sure access to the Internet is available to all
Americans, those are the kinds of things that will keep this economy
going.
[[Page 247]]
Especially, I would say, we have both the moral obligation and an
economic opportunity by increasing investment in the areas which have
been not so helped by the economic recovery, in the Indian reservations,
the inner-city communities, the rural communities where there haven't
been a lot of new jobs. If you get growth there, it is by definition
noninflationary, because you get--they haven't had much. So you can
lower the unemployment rate there, and you create new businesses, new
employees, and new consumers at the same time.
Mr. Blitzer. Mr. President, there's another E-mail question that we
have: How would you respond to arguments that you personally have had
very little to do with the economic boom that the country has
experienced during your administration?
The President. Well, I would respond by asking them to remember what
it was like before we announced and implemented our deficit reduction
plan and remember what a direct impact that had on interest rates, on
investment, and on the stock market.
The American people deserve the lion's share of the credit. The
high-tech community--we're part of it today--they deserve a lot of the
credit. High-technology companies employ only 8 percent of our people;
they're responsible for 30 percent of our growth. The companies that
restructured in the eighties deserve a lot of credit. Everybody who's
kept our markets open, guaranteeing low inflation and more competition,
they deserve a lot of credit.
But nonetheless, we had a completely jobless recovery, what some
people called a ``triple dip'' economy, until we finally said we're
going to do something about this deficit. And when we did it, it was
like breaking a dam, and the interest rates came down, and people
started being able to get money and investing at an unprecedented rate,
and the stock market started its upward march.
So I think the critical things we did--we had a good fiscal policy;
we had a good policy on the markets; and we had a good policy on
investing in technology and in people and education and training. And I
don't think there's any question that had we not taken that first big
bite out of the deficit, then the growth would have been much slower
than it has been.
Mr. Blitzer. Okay. I guess the person asking this question was also
suggesting that the Republicans in Congress, Alan Greenspan, and the
Internet economy, all of that combined to help you.
The President. And I agree with that. I agree. I think Chairman
Greenspan did a good job. The main thing he's
done, that I think he deserves a lot of credit for, is that he has been
able to look at the evidence of the new economy and act on the evidence,
instead of what you might call the old theology. Otherwise, he could
have killed this recovery by raising interest rates too much too
frequently in the past.
I think the Republicans in Congress--not a one of them voted for the
economic plan in '93. But we did have a bipartisan majority in both
Houses in '97 for the Balanced Budget Act, which continued what we were
doing, and they deserve credit for that. And I have never--I try never
to deny anybody else credit. This is an American achievement, not just
mine. But if we hadn't taken that first big bite out of the deficit, I
don't think we'd be where we are today.
Situation in Chechnya
Mr. Blitzer. All right, Mr. President, we have another question, an
E-mail question: Why are the Western nations--why have they not done
enough for Chechnya like they did for Kosovo?
The President. Well, first of all, I don't think the situations are
parallel. But I think the Western nations have spoken out against the
excesses. We believe--I think I speak for all the Western leaders; I
certainly will speak for myself--that Russia had a right to take on the
paramilitary forces who were practicing terrorist tactics, but that it
was a mistake to adopt the position that, in effect, ruled out
negotiations with the elected officials in Kosovo, who weren't part of
the terrorism, and to adopt tactics that cause a lot of civilian losses
without any kind of corresponding gain. So I think we've been pretty
clear about that. That's different from what happened in Kosovo, where
Milosevic basically ran the whole country
out based on their ethnic origin and had no intention of letting them
come back until he had crushed anybody's ability to say anything.
So I don't think that the situations are parallel. But I think we
have spoken out against the excesses in Chechnya and tried to get
humanitarian aid in there and will continue to try to help the people of
Chechnya and the legitimate political forces there. That's very
different from what the paramilitary forces did. They have
[[Page 248]]
to bear their share of responsibility for what happened as well. I think
some of them actually wanted the Chechnyan civilians attacked because
they thought it would help improve their political views.
Russia-U.S. Relations
Mr. Blitzer. Okay, we have a followup question from our chat room.
Let me read it to you as it's coming in: How can Americans know that
America is really at peace with Russia?
The President. Because we're neither fighting with them nor on the
edge of fighting. We've detargeted the nuclear weapons against each
other. We are working to secure the nuclear weapons in Russia, to help
them destroy nuclear weapons, to help safeguard the materials that
remain. And I hope very much that after the next Russian election, we'll
be able to make further progress on reducing the nuclear weapons there
that we both hold.
Mr. Blitzer. And Vladimir Putin, the Acting President, is he someone
that you can deal with?
The President. Based on what I have seen so far, I think that the
United States can do business with this man.
I think he's obviously highly intelligent; he's highly motivated; he has
strong views. We don't agree with him on everything, but what I have
seen of him so far indicates to me that he's capable of being a very
strong and effective and straightforward leader.
Taxes and the Internet
Mr. Blitzer. All right, let's go back to another issue involving the
Internet. This is a question: Mr. President, what role will you play in
the debate on taxing Internet commerce?
The President. Well, we've played some role already. I signed a bill
last year to have a 3-year moratorium on any kind of discriminatory or
transactional tax, if you will, on the commerce on the Internet. I don't
think that there should be any access or any other kind of
discriminatory taxes, from my point of view, ever on the Internet.
The tough question is the whole question of what happens to sales
that if they were not on the Internet would be subject to State and
local sales tax. And the Governors are trying to work through that. I
know Governor Leavitt has taken a
particular interest in that, the Governor of Utah. I think that's
something that we have to work through because we need--there are whole
questions about the need for States to simplify their tax structures,
and there are other questions there that have to be resolved. And I
think that's going to take some time to resolve.
But I don't think we should have access taxes on the Internet or any
other kind of discriminatory taxes, because this is an important part of
our economy, and we want it to grow. I think that for the States and the
localities, they're going to have to keep working until they work
through what the operational problems are.
Mr. Blitzer. Doesn't that discriminate, though, against stores--a
bookstore, for example----
The President. Of course it does.
Mr. Blitzer. ----that you have to pay tax----
The President. Absolutely, it does.
Mr. Blitzer. ----but if you go to Amazon.com you don't have to pay
taxes?
The President. It does, and that's the argument that the Governors
are making and the argument a lot of the merchants are making.
Mr. Blitzer. Well, where's your position on that?
The President. Well, what I'm trying to do is get them together.
There are also--the Internet people point out that there are also a lot
of complications in the way State taxes are. And they have on their side
the weight of Supreme Court law which basically was made from mail-order
sales. The same argument was made against mail-order sales. And the
prevailing legal position is that if you don't have enough connections
to a State, you don't have the obligation to collect and remit the sales
tax.
Keep in mind, the sales taxes do--it's just that the seller doesn't
have to collect and remit it. So most of the people I know who have
Internet businesses are concerned about trying to make sure they get a
simplified system, and they know what the drill is. Their main concern,
however, is not having access to the Internet itself taxed. And I'm with
them on that. And I'm trying to support the process that now exists to
resolve the issue of how State taxes, the sales taxes, can best be
collected in the way that's not too burdensome on the Internet.
You don't want to burden the Internet, but you don't want to put
people who aren't making sales on it out of business. And we've got to
find that right balance, and that's what we're working on.
[[Page 249]]
Austria
Mr. Blitzer. We have another question from our chat room, an
international question involving the political situation in Austria
given the fact that Joerg Haider is now--his party is part of the
Austrian Government. Let me read to you the question: What does the
United States plan to do to make sure that Austria knows that Nazi
sympathy will not be accepted?
The President. Well, I think we've made it quite clear that we do
not support any expression of either sympathy with the Nazis in the past
or ultranationalist race-based politics, anti-immigrant politics in the
future. That, I think, is equally important here. And we've also tried
to stay pretty close to where the European Union has been because, after
all, Austria is a part of Europe, and they've been very tough in
condemning what the Austrians have done here. So I think we're on the
right track.
There is a delicate balance, however. You know, Austria is a
democracy; this man's party got a certain
percentage of the vote. He did it based on appeals that went well beyond
a narrow race-based appeal. And we don't want to say or do anything that
builds his support even further. But I think it ought to be clear to
every Austrian citizen that we in the United States do not approve of
his political program or his excessive rhetoric.
Iran-U.S. Relations
Mr. Blitzer. Let's stay overseas. We have another E-mail question
about U.S.-Iranian relations: I'd like to know, Mr. President, your view
on the recent developments of Iranian-American relations as we, the
Iranian youth, are really anxiously following political developments
between the two countries and no doubt willing to finally see a healthy
and mutually respectful relationship between the two.
The President. Well, that's what I want. You know, I said several
weeks ago now, maybe a few months ago, that the United States had not
been entirely blameless in the past in our relationships with Iran, and
that we wanted a good relationship with Iran, that we did not support
and did not condone anyone who would support terrorist actions, and that
we had some difficulties with Iran, but we were viewing with interest
affairs within Iran. We wanted the Iranian people to have a good
democracy. We like to see these elections, and we want to be supportive
of better relationships if we can work them out on ways that are
mutually agreeable.
I think that one of the best things we could do for the long-term
peace and health of the Middle East and, indeed, much of the rest of the
world, is to have a constructive partnership with Iran. And I'm still
hoping that that can materialize. A lot of that is now in the hands of
the Iranian people and their elections and also the leaders of Iran.
Some of them don't want that, but I think some of them may want that.
And I think it's important that the genuine reformers there not be, in
effect, weakened because of their willingness to at least talk to us,
because I think the United States should always remain open to a
constructive dialog to people of good will. And I think that the
estrangement between these two countries is not a good thing. I think it
would be better if we could have a relationship.
Mr. Blitzer. As you know, Mr. President, in this regard, 13 Iranian
Jews were accused of spying, and they're being held. Is this an irritant
in this? What do you want the Iranian Government to do on that front?
The President. Well, I have been assured by the Israelis that they
were not spies. And I've done quite a bit of work on it. I'm very, very
concerned about this, because people cannot--it is an irritant. The
American Jewish community is very, very concerned about it, and we've
done a lot of work on it. And I'm hopeful that justice will be done
there and that no one will be punished for being a spy who isn't. That's
not a good thing to do. And that, obviously, is a real--it's one of the
sticking points.
But I think that there are other people of good will who the
Iranians recognize are their friends, who want better relationships with
them, who have also talked to them about this, and I'm hoping that it
will be worked out in a satisfactory manner.
Media Mergers
Mr. Blitzer. Okay, Mr. President, I think we have another question
from our chat room. Let's see what it is: How can we keep the media
giants from squashing the little guy? I guess they might be referring to
the recent merger of our own CNN-Time Warner-AOL. What's your answer to
that?
The President. Well, I think the main things to me are--there are
two sets of little guys, I guess. The one thing is you don't want to--
[[Page 250]]
and Steve Case has talked about this for many
years, himself----
Mr. Blitzer. He's the chairman of AOL.
The President. The chairman of AOL--that it's important not to have
access choked off. We want all these--if these mergers go through, we
want them to lead to greater access to greater options to consumers at
more affordable prices. Then the second thing is, you want other
competitors to be able to get into the game. That's what all the big
controversy was over the antitrust suit involving Microsoft. And that's
handled in the Justice Department, strictly apart from the White House,
so we had no role in that one way or the other.
And without expressing an opinion on that case one way or the other,
I think what I favor is an American economy where people who have good
ideas and new messages they want to get out ought to have some way to do
that, if they can generate a following. So that's what needs to be
monitored here.
Some of this amalgamation I think is inevitable, given the possible
synergy that could exist, for example, between a company like AOL and
Time Warner, with all of its myriad publications and programs and
networks. But you've got to have--there has to be some room for people
who want to compete, and then there has to be a guarantee that consumers
will not be choked off and their prices hiked and, in fact, they will
have more access to more programs at more affordable prices. And I think
those are the touchstones that ought to guide Government policy.
Small Business
Mr. Blitzer. All right. Let's take another question from our chat
room, CNN.com chat room: What will the current and future
administrations do to keep small business alive? Sort of related to the
last question.
The President. One of the things that I'm very proud of about this
economy--and again, I don't take total credit for this; this is part of
our prosperity--but in every year I've been President, we've set a new
record for starting small businesses--every single year.
I think that the Small Business Administration has an important role
to play. I think that we have dramatically increased the number of small
business loans that we finance, and we've concentrated on women and
minorities, others who have been traditionally denied credit.
We have promoted aggressively for the first time what we call
community development financial institutions, where we put Federal money
into banks to try to help them make small loans to people who never
could have gotten credit before. Just as we do around the world, we're
now doing that here. And that's helping.
We've tried to continue to minimize the burden of Government
regulations on small business. And I think that's important--to keep an
entrepreneurial environment in America, so people can get access to
venture capital if they've got an idea and start it.
So I think having the right conditions and then having specific
access to capital and technical support through the Small Business
Administration and the community financial institutions--that's the best
thing we can do for small business.
President's Legacy
Mr. Blitzer. We have another question about the future in our chat
room: What will the history books say about the Clinton Presidency?
The President. Well, I'm not sure, because that's for the historians
to decide. But I think they will say, among other things, that we had
a--we came into office with a different approach that was attuned better
to the changes that were going on in the economy, in the society and in
the world, and that we helped America get through this enormous period
of change and transition--in the metaphor I use, to build our bridge to
the 21st century--and that our country was stronger when we finished
than it was when we began. I hope that's what they'll say, and I believe
they will.
President's Future Plans
Mr. Blitzer. All right, we have a follow-up question from our chat
room. Let's take a look at that one: Mr. President, what are you going
to do when you leave office? Which is now less than a year away. You
probably--are you counting the days?
The President. No, not in a negative way. I mean, I'm not eager for
them to be over. In fact, one of the problems I have is, I want to work
even harder now to try to get as much done as I can.
When I leave, I'm going to establish a library and a public policy
center.
Mr. Blitzer. That will be in Little Rock.
[[Page 251]]
The President. And that will take a couple years to do. And I'm
going to try to maintain a high level of activity in the areas that I'm
particularly interested in. I've spent a lot of my life working on
reconciliation of people across racial, religious, and other lines. I'm
very interested in using the power of technology, like what we're doing
now, to help poor countries and poor areas overcome what would
ordinarily take years in economic development and education.
I'm very interested in continuing my work to try to convince
Americans and the rest of the world that we can beat global warming
without shutting down the economy, that it's no longer necessary to use
more greenhouse gases to grow economically. I'm very interested in
promoting the concept of public service among young people and trying to
get more young Americans to take some time off to serve in our National
Government or the State and local government. Those are four things I'll
do.
Basically, I want to try to be a good citizen. America's given me a
lot, and more than I could have ever dreamed. I've loved being
President. And I feel that I've acquired a certain level of experience
and knowledge, that I owe that to my country. And along the way, I hope
to write a few books and have a little fun, too. And I hope I'll be a
member of the Senate spouses club. I'm going to do my best to support my
wife in every way I can.
But I just want to be a good citizen. I want to try to put what I've
learned in a lifetime to use in a way that benefits the people of
America and others around the world who I care about.
Mr. Blitzer. And you'll commute between Chappaqua, New York, and
Little Rock, sort of?
The President. Yes, I'll spend some time in Little Rock for the next
couple of years, you know, like I said, getting the facility up. And
I'll spend some time with Hillary, as
much as I possibly can, in New York. And then I'll probably travel some.
And I hope we'll be able to travel some together. It depends on what
happens in the next year.
But I'm really looking forward to it. I love this job. I don't know
if I'll ever do anything again that I love the work as much as I love
this. John Kennedy described it well. He said, basically, it challenges
all your abilities. It challenges your mind, your emotions, even your
physical strength. But I think that I can do a lot of things that will
help other people when I leave here, and I'm going to do my best to do
that.
President's Favorite Websites
Mr. Blitzer. All right, Mr. President, if you'll take a look at our
chat room, the people who are participating in the CNN.com chat, they're
participating in huge numbers right now. Let's take another question,
though, from an E-mail person named Seth. He says this: Mr. President, I
have heard that you are an avid web surfer and on-line shopper. What are
your favorite websites?
The President. Well, I wouldn't say I am avid. I did do some
Christmas shopping for the first time on-line this year, though. And I
even--I bought some things from the Native American craftspeople up in
South Dakota, at Pine Ridge, which was really interesting to me.
But I love books, so I like Amazon.com. And I'm fascinated by eBay,
because I like to swap and trade, and it reminds me of the old kind of
farmer's markets and town markets I used to visit when I started out in
politics in Arkansas so many years ago. I think the whole concept of
people being able to get on-line and sort of trade with each other, and
almost barter, is utterly fascinating to me.
Issues of the New Millennium
Mr. Blitzer. All right, we have another question, Mr. President. We
only have a little time left. Let's take this from the chat room: Mr.
President, what is the biggest issue facing Americans in the new
millennium?
The President. Well, I think the most important thing that we have
to do is to make up our minds that we are actually going to build a more
united country out of our diversity and out of our groundbreaking
technology and advances in science and technology. That is, I think that
if you look around the world today, the biggest problems seem to be
rooted in racial, ethnic, religious strife. If you look at America and
how well we fit with a positive vision of the 21st century world and you
look at the continuing problems we've had here, with these hate crimes,
for example, the most important thing we could do is get our minds right
and get our spirits right and realize that we have to learn to live with
people who are different from us. We have to learn to keep our conflicts
[[Page 252]]
with them within proper bounds, so that our common goals override the
differences between us.
If we build one America, that's the most important thing. The
American people are so innovative, so creative, and we're so well-
positioned for the future, everything else will work out. But if we
allow ourselves to fall into these deep divisions over--including
political ones--differences of opinion are healthy; demonization is
destructive and self-indulgent. And that's basically what we've got to
work on.
If we can keep working together enough in creative tension, then
everything else will work out. I'm confident of it.
Social Security
Mr. Blitzer. All right, Mr. President. We have time for one final
question. It's from Wolf in Washington, DC--that would be me, by
prerogative, as the moderator of this discussion, this on-line interview
we're having: You know the Republicans today in the House of
Representatives are pushing legislation that would remove the limits,
ease the limits on Social Security recipients as far as their earnings
after they reach 65 until 70--a very sensitive subject, affects a lot of
people watching right now, how much money they could earn and still be
eligible for Social Security. Will you work with the Republicans,
support them in eliminating those caps on earnings?
The President. Absolutely. I'm thrilled by this. I hope this is just
the beginning of a signal from them that they're willing to work on this
whole Social Security area.
I think we should lift the earnings limit for two reasons. One is, I
don't really think it's fair for people--if you're 65 today in America,
your life expectancy is 83. And you want to be alert; you want to be
physically strong. And we know as people stay more active, they're going
to live better, not just longer. So I don't think we should penalize
them.
Secondly, I think as the baby boomers retire, it's going to be
important to have a higher percentage of people over 65, if they want
to, working. This will be good for our society. I'm strongly in favor of
it.
If they will send me a bill--what we call in Washington-speak, a
clean bill--that is, doesn't have a lot of other things unrelated to
that littered to it--I will be happy to sign it.
Then the second thing I'd like to urge them to do is to think about
my proposal to dedicate the interest savings that we get from paying
down the debt because of the surplus in the Social Security tax to the
Social Security Trust Fund to do two things: Number one, put the life of
the Trust Fund out to 2050; that will take care of most of the baby boom
generation; and number two, do something about a single woman's poverty
on Social Security. Married women's poverty on Social Security, about 5
percent; overall, seniors over 65, under 10 percent now. Single women on
Social Security tend to live longer, tend to have less money; their
poverty rate is somewhere between 18 and 20 percent.
So I like getting rid of the earnings limitation. It's the right
thing to do. Let's just do it. But then let's lengthen the life of the
Trust Fund and do something about the poverty rate among women who are
retired.
Mr. Blitzer. Mr. President, thank you so much for joining us from
the Oval Office. Always, of course, great to be in the Oval Office. And
one day when you're not in the Oval Office, you'll probably be excited
coming back here as well.
The President. I will be. I'll always be excited to come here. And
maybe I'll even get to do a web chat with you afterward.
Note: The interview began at 1:43 p.m. in the Oval Office at the White
House. In his remarks, the President referred to Gov. George W. Bush of
Texas; President Slobodan Milosevic of the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro); Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah;
Joerg Haider, leader of Austria's Freedom Party; and Steve Case,
chairman and chief executive officer, America Online. A tape was not
available for verification of the content of this interview.