[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book I)]
[January 14, 2000]
[Pages 59-63]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]
Remarks on Airline Safety and an Exchange With Reporters
January 14, 2000
Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
The President. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. I asked you
here today so I could make some remarks about airline safety. But in
view of an item that was in the morning news, I would like to also say a
few words
[[Page 60]]
about the efforts we're making to ensure prescription drug coverage for
millions of our senior citizens and disabled Americans who rely on
Medicare.
Last year I proposed a comprehensive plan to modernize Medicare to
meet the challenges of the 21st century, to extend the life of the Trust
Fund and add a much-needed voluntary option for prescription drug
coverage. And as you know, there's been some considerable resistance up
until now from both the drug companies and from some in Congress.
Today's news that the drug companies say they are ready to work with
us on providing affordable optional drug coverage and making sure older
people have access to the highest quality medications developed is a
very good first step. Now, what we need is positive actions from the
drug company and positive action in Congress, not just on the benefit
but on the efforts to strengthen and extend the life of the Medicare
Trust Fund.
I hope that this is a good beginning of what can be a very good year
for the American people.
Airline Safety
Now let me begin my remarks by welcoming and thanking the people who
are here with me, beginning with our FAA Administrator, Jane
Garvey; Deputy Secretary of Transportation
Mort Downey; American Airlines Chairman
Don Carty; Delta Airlines CEO Leo
Mullin; first vice president of the Airline
Pilots Association International, Captain Dennis Dolan; Allied Pilots Association President Richard LaVoy; and Mark DeAngelis, the
Aviation Safety Action Program representative for the Transport Workers
Union.
Three years ago I asked Vice President Gore to lead a Commission on Aviation Safety and Security,
looking at how to make our skies as safe as they can possibly be.
Already, there is less than one fatal crash for every one million
commercial flights. But we know we can do better still. Any accident,
any death in the air is still one too many.
The Commission set a goal of reducing fatal accidents by 80 percent
over 10 years. Its members agreed that the best way to meet the goal was
to stop accidents before they happen and identify problems before they
have terrible consequences. This is a completely different way of
looking at safety. It requires business, labor, and regulators to work
together in a completely different way--as partners, not adversaries.
Everyone must focus on fixing problems, not fixing blame.
I'm proud to be here with all these people today to announce a new
partnership among business, labor, and Government to set us ahead of the
curve on safety. Under aviation safety action programs, pilots will
report problems or concerns immediately to safety experts at their
airline and the Federal Aviation Administration. They'll be encouraged
to share their valuable insights about doing the job more safely. They
will be freed from the fear of being disciplined for admitting that
something went wrong.
The FAA will still have the right to take action against deliberate
violations of aviation rules, criminal activity, or drug and alcohol
use. The experts will get the data they need to stay in front on safety,
to solve problems, evaluate existing safety systems, and propose new
ones.
We know these programs will work because American Airlines and its
pilots have run one as a demonstration for more than 5 years now. Pilots
reported literally thousands of concerns to the FAA. Those reports
produced real improvements in procedures and in equipment. They even
helped designers and builders create safer planes and airports.
For example, pilots' expertise changed the way some airports use
lights and signs on the runways, and pilots helped to rewrite the safety
checklist they must complete while planes taxi from the gate. And when
American extended its program to mechanics and dispatchers, they
improved equipment manuals and maintenance procedures.
I hope we'll be able to follow their example and open this program
to all the people who make airplanes fly, flight attendants, mechanics,
dispatchers. For the first time, we have regulators, business, and labor
working as real partners. When it comes to safety, everyone has a
responsibility. We want everyone on the team. And let me again say, I
have only the profoundest gratitude, on behalf of all the American
people and especially those who will be in airplanes in the future, to
all those who are here with me today and those whom they represent.
Thank you very much.
[[Page 61]]
Federal Budget
Q. Mr. President, why are you dropping caps on the budget, which
were so dear to you in the past?
The President. Well, first of all, the caps were literally
completely shredded in the last budget by the majority in Congress. And
so what I have to do now is to adopt an honest budget based on the
spending levels that were adopted, in the reasonable expectation that
inflation at least will be taken care of, particularly in defense. If
you will remember, we had a big issue about how much the defense budget
would be increased, but there were other increases, as well.
So you will see when my budget comes out that it still does
everything I said we have to do. It invests more in education, science
and technology, and other important areas. It protects the money
necessary to take Social Security out beyond the life of the baby boom
generation, to extend the life of Medicare, and very importantly, will
still allow us to get out of debt, for the first time since 1835, over
the next 15 years.
So all the budget objectives that I have--continuing to run the
surpluses, getting the country out of debt, but continuing to invest in
the things we need--will be met by the budget I present to Congress.
Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
Q. Mr. President, on drugs, a pharmaceutical industry spokesman
today did say that your plan is still unacceptable to them, and if you
come back with the same plan, they'll still fight you on this. My
question to you is, are you prepared to compromise with them? And what
is your understanding--if their big objection is the danger of price
caps not only on Medicare drugs, but that this could spill over to the
commercial sector----
The President. Well, first of all, there's no danger of price caps.
But what I think they're worried about is the fact that if the
Government becomes a big buyer, that we'll be able to bargain for lower
prices at greater volume. I don't think that's a bad thing.
You know, someone ought to ask them how they can possibly justify
the fact that American senior citizens are now being carried across the
border to Canada to buy drugs produced in America by American drug
companies, with the help of public funds that have paid for research,
with the availability of tax deductions for research and all of that,
and Americans are going across the border in Canada and buying the same
drugs for less than half of what they cost here.
So I think what they ought to do is come sit down with us and let's
see if we can agree on a common approach. There may be a way that we can
agree on an approach. That's why I was somewhat cautious in my remarks
today.
I think it's a good thing that they recognize that it would be
better if Medicare could provide this benefit, because we know 75
percent of our senior citizens and probably a higher percentage of our
disabled people who need medications cannot afford what they need. And
we know it can not only lengthen life and in many cases save lives, but
it can also improve the quality of life.
So I think it's a very important issue. And I take their offer in a
positive way, and I just hope they'll come sit down with us. And we'll
try to sit down with them and with people in both parties in Congress
who care about this and see if we can't work out a common position that
we can pass, because I think it's a very important issue.
Q. Do you think it's real, not a PR move on their part just to keep
you from bashing them?
The President. I don't know. You know, I don't like to bash people.
I never have done that as an option of first choice. And I'm not bashing
them today. But I think that their big problem is that ordinary
Americans now know that if they live close enough to the Canadian
border, they could cross the border and buy a lot of drugs for half what
they pay here, and in many other countries, even though the drugs are
produced here by our companies, and that any large producer will do the
best--like in the private sector, try to get the best bargain they can.
But if there's some way to work through this, I'll be glad to sit
down and make sure our people are available to them, and we'll try to
work it out.
Director of National Drug Control Policy
Q. Mr. President, is it right to offer financial incentives to TV
networks for incorporating antidrug messages into scripts? And are you
inclined to try to seek similar incentives for other issues
[[Page 62]]
involving TV programming, like, say, gun violence?
The President. Well, first of all let me say, it is my understanding
that what General McCaffrey was trying to
do is to amplify the impact of the advertising program that we have been
running--and keep in mind, a number of networks have agreed not only to
take paid ads but have run a lot of our ads for free or reduced rates.
And they are under an obligation to run public service announcements.
I think that General McCaffrey
reached a conclusion, based on how many people see public service
announcements that are on late at night as opposed to primetime
programming that more people watch, that if the networks were willing to
put a good antidrug message in heavily watched programs, particularly by
the most vulnerable young people, that would be a good thing. And it's
my understanding that there's nothing mandatory about this, that there
was no attempt to regulate content or tell people what they had to put
into it--of course, I wouldn't support that. But I think he's done a
very good job at increasing the sort of public interest component of
what young people hear on the media, and I think it's working; we see
drug use dropping.
And let me say, I've talked to a lot of people in the entertainment
community who liked the idea that without compromising the integrity of
their programs, they might be involved in all kinds of public service
efforts. So that's where I am on this. This was his initiative, and I hadn't given any thought to the question
of whether it might be applied in other ways, frankly.
Q. Do you think it's a deceptive move? It could be used for other
messages in the future.
The President. Well, it could be. If the Government were writing the
content, it could be. And I don't think we should be doing that. I think
that--however, I think what General McCaffrey tried to do--which was to say, look, if you will do this,
this can count against your obligation to run public service
announcements which, as you know, are very often run in off hours and
times when not many people are watching--I think this guy's intense and
passionate and committed. And we've got too many kids using drugs,
still. So I think that's what he was trying to do. I don't think there
was any attempt to try to undermine the content or the independence or
the integrity of the networks and the programming.
Airline Safety
Q. Mr. President, on aviation safety, the Europeans have been very
successful not doing what you're announcing today but downloading data
from airplanes, analyzing hundreds of flights for patterns that could
cause problems. We don't do that much in this country, because there's
still a dispute between the airlines and the FAA over what would happen
if this turned up some violations that could result in prosecutions.
When are we going to get the kind of safety program they're using
successfully in Europe to analyze data instead of pilot reports?
The President. Jane, you want to answer
that?
FAA Administrator Jane F. Garvey. Thanks,
Mr. President. Nice to see you, Matt. Well, first of all, as you know
we're really looking at the whole issue of FOQA. We do have a policy in
place which--the policy allows the information to be protected, which we
think is very, very good. We've got a number of airlines who are working
with us on that issue.
I think the real critical question is, when can we see that in an
actual rule? And we are working that through the administration and
working very hard to see it in a rulemaking. I think it's absolutely the
right direction. And certainly the combination of the information we can
get from the flight data recorders as well as the information we can get
from the pilots or the mechanics makes a very powerful tool. So I'm glad
we have the policy in place, and we're moving toward the rulemaking.
The President. I'd like to make a general comment about this, and
then we've got to go. I'm obviously not an expert in how airlines work,
but I know quite a bit about production processes and manufacturing.
It's something I've spent a lot of time studying over nearly 20 years
now. It was a big part of the job I used to have when I was a Governor.
And I can tell you that the kind of teamwork approach that has been
announced today, in making people feel they won't be punished when they
say they think there's something wrong or a mistake was made, was, in my
judgment, the most significant factor leading all kinds of American
manufacturers to a zero-defect approach, which had a major role in the
resurgence of the manufacturing sector over the last decade and a major
role in the comeback of the American economy.
So I believe that what they're doing here is very important. It is
not rational to believe that
[[Page 63]]
what has worked so well in some other sector of our economy won't work
just as well here. I think it's a great thing, and I thank them for
doing it.
Michael Jordan
Q. Should Michael Jordan come to Washington?
The President. You bet. It will be fun. [Laughter] That's a no-
brainer. [Laughter]
Thanks.
Note: The President spoke at 3 p.m. in the Roosevelt Room at the White
House. A reporter referred to former NBA Chicago Bull Michael Jordan,
reported to be accepting a management position with the NBA Washington
Wizards. Administrator Garvey referred to FOQA, Flight Operations
Quality Assurance.