    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (2000, Book I)]
    [March 9, 2000]
    [Pages 422-426]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at the One America Meeting With Religious Leaders
    March 9, 2000

        The President. Thank you. Well, first of all, welcome to the White
    House. Welcome to this wonderful East Room, where Thomas Jefferson and
    Meriwether Lewis planned the Lewis and Clark expedition to explore parts
    of America no one had ever seen, to try to find an ocean that no one
    thought could be reached by land. In a way, we are here on an even
    grander expedition, to try to find a place in the human heart no one has
    ever seen, that many believe we cannot reach in this life. And so I
    thank you all for coming.
        Thank you, Sandy, for your passionate
    and vigorous leadership. Thank you, Ben Johnson, for telling me that you like your job every day.
    [Laughter] I was afraid that I had given you an impossible job, you
    would only hear from people who were disappointed in us, and that you
    would quit on me. So I'm glad you're happy, and I appreciate you.
        Thank you, Maria, for your leadership on
    this effort. And I want to thank the members of the administration who
    are here, who have been introduced. And Dr. Franklin and Judy Winston, thank
    you for being here. And I thank my good friend Congressman Amo
    Houghton for being here, for proving that this
    issue is not a partisan issue, and for being in Selma. Didn't we have a
    grand day Sunday--one of the great days of my life, and many of you were
    there.
        I was thinking, when I was in Selma Sunday and we were walking
    across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, what an important role the faith
    community of that day had in the civil rights movement. And there was an
    elderly woman there who was 90 years old, who was telling me about a
    rabbi who came to march with them. And I think it was Rabbi Heschel, but
    I'm not sure because she didn't remember, but I think that's who it must
    have been. And the rabbi had a very, very long beard, and she said,
    ``You know, a lot of us thought God himself had come down to Earth to go
    with us.''
        I say that because even today, contemporary surveys show that the
    American people look to the faith community to lead us forward on this
    great journey. Some of you have a foot in both worlds, so to speak. I
    see my great friend Reverend and former Congressman Floyd Flake from New York out there. But all of you must have a
    foot in this world on this issue.
        I also want to comment that if we had had a meeting like this 35
    years ago in the White House and it had been a very inclusive meeting,
    there would have been probably--probably--African-Americans and
    Hispanics here, and European-Americans, maybe some Native Americans,
    although we were pretty tone deaf about that back then, and maybe--
    maybe--one Asian-American. And all the faiths represented here would
    have been Christians and Jews and maybe Native Americans.
        Today we have a large number of Muslims; we have Buddhists here; we
    have Baha'i members here and perhaps many other faiths. I say that to
    make this point. I think you can make a compelling argument that getting
    this right in the United States and putting us in a position to play a
    role of leadership in the world is not just a racial and ethnic issue
    anymore; it is also inevitably a religious issue.

    [[Page 423]]

        If you look around the world where I have been so involved--take my
    people, the Irish. There's no ethnic difference; all the differences are
    religious. Or if you look at our continuing efforts in the Middle East,
    is that an ethnic conflict or a religious one? In our attempts to
    resolve the difficulties between Greece and Turkey and on the island of
    Cyprus, is that an ethnic conflict or a religious one? When you see the
    continuing efforts to resolve the future of Tibet and the role of the
    Dalai Lama, is that a religious conflict or an ethnic one?
        I'm sure all of you have thought about this more than I have. The
    most dangerous place in the world today, I think you could argue, is the
    Indian subcontinent and the line of control in Kashmir. Is that an
    ethnic conflict or a religious one? So I think in order to understand
    this, even, and make this journey, we have to learn not only more about
    our ethnic and racial differences but our religious differences. How are
    we different? How are our world views different; how are they in common?
    How do we find a way through it all to reaffirm our common humanity?
        We know that the three great monotheistic religions that grew out of
    the sturdy but difficult soil of the Middle East all say that we're
    supposed to love our neighbors as ourselves; that if we turn aside a
    stranger, it's as if we turn aside God; that we should not do to others
    what we would not like to have done to ourselves. And we know that in
    various ways, all the faiths in this room, however they define man's
    understanding of the divine, at least recognize the fundamental
    importance on this Earth of our common humanity.
        So I hope that we will be able to talk today about what you're going
    to do, but I hope beyond that, you will be thinking today about how more
    and more of this racial and ethnic diversity, both within America and
    beyond our borders, has an inevitable religious component, and therefore
    how people of faith speak about it, behave about it, what their body
    language is, even, will have a profound impact on how this whole thing
    plays out in 21st century America.
        If you heard the State of the Union, you heard me tell the story
    about the evening we had in this very room that my wife sponsored to observe the millennium, where we had one
    of the founders of the Internet, the man who sent the first E-mail to
    his profoundly deaf wife 18 years ago, Vint
    Cerf, talking with Eric Lander, one of our human genome experts. And the beginning of
    their whole discussion was about how we could never have uncovered the
    mysteries of the human gene without the revolution in computers, because
    it made it mechanically, scientifically possible to deal with things
    that small and that diverse.
        But in the end, Lander just said, almost in passing, he said, you
    know, we're all genetically 99.9 percent the same. And if you get an
    ethnic group together, the differences among individuals within the
    group will be greater than the differences between one group and
    another, between African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and Native
    Americans. The differences within the groups, genetically, are greater
    than the group profile from one group to another. And when I said that,
    there was almost a groan in the Congress, you know, because the
    Republicans and Democrats having to recognize they were 99.9 percent the
    same--[laughter]--it made them physically uncomfortable. You know, you
    could see that they were having real trouble dealing with this. And I
    think it made them understand how others have real trouble dealing with
    it.
        But I think--one of the things I think is most interesting is how
    the advances of science sooner or later seem to confirm the teaching of
    ancient faiths, the teaching of people who maybe counted with an abacus
    and wrote in a language now long dead or had no writing at all. This is
    worth remembering.
        So I wanted to make this point to you. I mean, America would have
    never had any of its great movements for social justice had it not been
    for leaders of faith--none of them. And the same can be said of many
    other nations as well. But as we grow more diverse, our opportunity to
    do good around the world is even greater if we can be good here at home.
        But I would argue to you, we will not be able to do it unless we
    understand that this whole diversity, more than ever before, is not like
    bringing the preachers and the priests and the rabbis to help heal the
    soul of the sinful races. Now it's caught up in our entire world view
    and this multiplicity of faiths we now have in America. And we need to
    take this whole effort to a different level. And that's why I ask for
    your help--to begin with, understanding. It's hard to understand this,
    if you've never lived in a culture different from your own.

    [[Page 424]]

        So, I've already talked a little more than I meant to, but I wanted
    you to be thinking about that because I think--you know, none of you are
    term-limited, except by the Almighty. [Laughter] And so you will be
    around here doing these kinds of things, presumably, when I am no longer
    President. But I will predict to you that the work of building one
    America and dealing with this diversity will more and more require a
    deeper understanding of the diversity of faiths and the understanding of
    the relationship between human nature and the divine, and how it's
    articulated and played out in life, than it ever has before to this
    day--which means your role will be even more important in the new
    century than it was in the pivotal struggles of our Nation's past.
        Thank you very much.

    [At this point, the discussion proceeded.]

        The President.   I would like to say two things very briefly,
    because I want to hear more from you.
        First of all, I do think this whole issue of economic equity and
    empowerment is important. And I believe there are two elements to that.
    One is, are people who are poor being given enough support from their
    Government and from their religious institutions; the other, that I
    think is the far more important question--and one to which Mr.
    Flake, among others, has done so much--are we
    doing enough to empower the poor to support themselves and to take a
    different path to the future? And that is what this whole new markets
    effort we're making this year is designed to do. So I hope you'll be
    involved in that.
        Let me just say about the Diallo case, I tried to think of something
    to say which would be true, relevant, and wouldn't put us all in the
    position of second-guessing the jury. That is, we didn't--or looking
    into the hearts and minds of those police officers. That is, we didn't
    sit there; we didn't hear the evidence. Four African-Americans did,
    among others. So let's posit. The jury rendered a verdict, and it is the
    verdict. But the larger fact is that we all have the feeling, I think,
    that it probably wouldn't have happened, as I said, if it had been a
    white young man in a white neighborhood under the same facts.
        And so the real issue here--and again, we're getting more diverse
    now, more racially diverse. And another thing, linguistically we're
    getting much more diverse. So you're going to have people in
    neighborhoods that can't even communicate in tense situations with the
    people whose job it is to enforce the law.
        Keep in mind, this also puts more pressure on the police. A lot of
    them believe that it's not the color of their skin, it's the color of
    their uniform that causes them to be distrusted and to feel like aliens.
    So when they get treated that way, then they feel more endangered and
    more threatened, and they're more likely then to do something.
        So one of the things--I didn't say this earlier, but one of the
    things that I hope will come out of the Diallo case, if you looked at
    the powerful image his mother has made--
    she's been quite a grand person, I think, the way she has tried to free
    herself of what any parent would feel, to go to the larger issues. I
    just hope that one of the things we can all do, coming out of this, is
    not only to make sure that the police forces in our diverse communities
    are themselves properly diverse. That's important, but that's not all
    there is to it, because you're never going to be having a time when
    there won't be, let's say, black police officers who have to arrest
    Hispanics and Asian police officers have to arrest white people or, you
    know, whatever it is. There's never going to be a time when you're going
    to have total racial homogeneity between the police and the communities
    they're working. So I hope that we can come out of this so that within a
    period of time, a reasonable period of time, you could all stand up and
    say, whatever happens, ``I don't believe it would have happened
    differently if the police and the person involved had, themselves, been
    of a different race.'' That's what I want you to be able to say. That's
    the big issue here.
        I wish I could bring that boy back for his mother and his friends,
    to give him the life he should have had. But I can't do that. You can't
    do that. And we can't be in a position where we second-guess a jury that
    sat there and, I believe, honestly made their best judgment. And we
    didn't hear all those facts. But we do know the larger truth, and that's
    what I hope will come out of this, a real determination--and a lot of
    you can have an impact on this in your communities, to bring the police
    and the community together and role-play this, game this out. This is a
    matter of training as

    [[Page 425]]

    well as tone. It's a matter of disciplined work as well as the heart.
        You know, you'd never think about sending a police force out unless
    they've trained in how to use their guns, unless they knew how to put on
    their bulletproof vests, unless they knew how to give someone their
    Miranda warnings, unless they knew these things. You have to train for
    this. This is not just a matter of having a good heart. This is work.
    This is discipline.
        How many times have you had to remind yourself of that in your own
    work? Not just enough to have good intentions, you've got to train and
    work for this.
        I've talked more about this than I meant to, but this is a big deal.
    We'll never get this race issue right unless we get the police-community
    relations issue right. And most of these police officers--listen, they
    get up every day; they put on those uniforms; and they've got their
    lives on the line. And they--most of them really do try to do the right
    thing, in a decent way and an honorable way. And we shouldn't lose sight
    of that. And we've got to train for this so that we don't have these
    Diallo-type cases again.
        Yes, sir. I promised to call on you. And in the back there, that
    gentleman.

    [The discussion continued.]

        The President. Thank you. Let me be very brief here. Number one, we
    have this national effort to reduce violence against children,
    especially in the schools. And we've got a lot of things going; it's a
    subject for another moment. If you would like to be involved in it, if
    any of you would like to be involved in it, if you would give to
    Ben or Maria a card or address or something, we'll get you involved.
    We've got a lot of things going on here, because there is much more we
    can do.
        Secondly, on the perception of the United States around the world,
    first of all, I think sometimes people think we can do more than we can,
    which, when we don't do it, therefore, gives us a negative perception.
    And then sometimes, we try to do things, that if we do it in the wrong
    way, we're seen as being arrogant or high-handed. And then, we are
    having our own debates in this country, which you saw in the debate in
    the Senate over the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, for example, about what the
    role of the United States and the world should be.
        So I think that some of this misperception is inevitable. But one of
    the reasons I'm about to go to the Indian subcontinent is that I want to
    try to minimize--if people are mad at us, at least I want them to have
    an accurate perception. [Laughter] If they think we have a certain
    policy or a certain attitude, I want them to have an accurate view of
    what that policy or attitude is. And it's a constant effort, but I
    appreciate that.
        I wonder if--I promised this gentleman in the back I'd call on him,
    but we have some people here from different religious traditions, from
    East Asia or South Asia who have not spoken. I wonder if any of them
    would like to be heard before we go.
        Go ahead, sir.

    [The discussion continued.]

        The President. First of all, I strongly support what was done in
    South Africa. And I have tried on various occasions to do that for the
    Japanese who were interned here during the war, for the African-
    Americans that were subject to the Tuskegee experiments. And I wish you
    would work with our people, and let's try to give some shape to what
    your thinking is.
        I do believe that it's--I was thrilled that you mentioned that old
    debate between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, because when people look
    at John Adams, they sort of have this preconceived notion of what he was
    like and what Jefferson was like. You would think that Jefferson was
    arguing for passion, and Adams was arguing for reason. And it was
    actually the other way around, which is maybe just their own form of
    denial, who knows? [Laughter]
        But anyway, it was a great debate. And I agree that this is
    fundamentally a problem of the heart.

    [The discussion continued.]

        The President. Thank you. Let me say, I want to have a chance to
    greet you all individually, so we're going to have to break up. I do
    want to say, Bishop, that I don't believe
    I'll ever forget that remark that without followers, a leader is just a
    person out on a walk. [Laughter] Without you and some of our friends of
    the last couple years, I would have been taking a lot of walks.
    [Laughter] So I thank you for that.
        I want to end this on a high note, if I might, since we're here
    talking about one America. After a 4-year wait, Judge Richard
    Paez, a Hispanic judge from California, of
    the Mormon faith, and Marsha Berzon were
    confirmed by

    [[Page 426]]

    the United States Senate today. They got the highest rating by the
    American Bar Association, and they added to the diversity of the bench.
    This week Judge Julio Fuentes of New Jersey
    was also confirmed. So I think maybe we're, by fits and starts, moving
    toward our one America. And we will work with you more.
        I look forward to seeing you all individually. Thank you very much.
        Oh, wait. We've got to have a benediction, and this is my fault.
    Tell them to stop the music. [Laughter]
        Deputy Chief of Staff Maria Echaveste.
    I would like to have Jake Swamp from the Mohawks
    lead us in closing prayer.
        The President. Thank you, sir.

    Note: The President spoke at 2:30 p.m. in the East Room at the White
    House. In his remarks, he referred to Sanford Cloud, Jr., president and
    chief executive officer, National Conference for Community and Justice;
    John Hope Franklin, former Chair, and Judith A. Winston, former
    Executive Director, President's Initiative on Race; Vinton G. Cerf,
    senior vice president of Internet architecture and technology, MCI
    WorldCom, and his wife, Sigrid; Eric Lander, director, Whitehead/MIT
    Center for Genome Research; and Bishop Chandler Owens, Church of God in
    Christ. The President also referred to West African immigrant Amadou
    Diallo, who died after being shot in the Bronx Borough of New York City
    by four police officers, who were acquitted of all criminal charges on
    February 25 in Albany, NY; and Mr. Diallo's mother, Kadiadou Diallo. Ms.
    Echaveste referred to Jake Swamp, founder, Tree of Peace Society. The
    conference was formally entitled, ``The President's One America Meeting
    With Religious Leaders.''