[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (1999, Book II)]
[October 1, 1999]
[Pages 1652-1656]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Reception in Palo Alto, 
California
October 1, 1999

    Thank you. You know, Tom cracked that joke 
about the White House. [Laughter] I'm a Southerner. What I thought 
sitting here watching him is we have reversed all the roles in ``Gone 
With the Wind.'' [Laughter] We're about to remake the whole movie, and 
it's going to be better this time. [Laughter]
    Let me say, first of all, I am delighted to be here. I thank 
Tom and Jeanne for 
opening their beautiful home and bringing their beautiful family 
together, and their larger family, for this event. I thank my dear 
friend Senator Boxer for being here and for 
her leadership. I want to thank Governor and Mrs. 
Romer for being here; and Beth and Ron Dozoretz, and Joe 
Andrew, for all their work; and Art 
Torres, the chairman of the California Democratic 
Party; and I thank Steve Westly and Chris 
Larsen and everybody else who had anything to 
do with this event.
    There are people here tonight who started with me in 1991 and 1992, 
and there are people here tonight I've never met before. And that's sort 
of a metaphor for what's happening to the economy and the society of 
Silicon Valley and the whole, what I hope is happening to our Democratic 
Party.
    I want to take a few minutes to sort of put all these specific 
issues that are flying back and forth across the airwaves and over the 
Internet into some larger context, if I might. Our economy has been 
strong for so long now a lot of people have forgotten what it was like 
in 1992, when we had high unemployment, high interest rates; we 
quadrupled the debt in 12 years of this country. We had had stagnant 
wages, and the society was beginning to fray rather badly. We had 
escalating crime rates, escalating welfare rolls, increasing racial 
tensions. We had a lot of problems.
    And we had people who believed that they could get elected by 
driving deeper wedges into our American society instead of by bringing 
us together. And when I first came out here--and Larry was one of the first people I met with when I came 
out--when I first came out here, I knew that a big part of making 
America work and preparing America for the 21st century would be to 
model and learn from what was happening here.
    You know, this whole technology-based economy here is about 8 or 9 
percent of the American economy now directly, but it has accounted for 
30 percent of our growth since I've been President. That's a stunning 
statistic that all of you should know, if you don't. And if you think 
about how it works, it's the way America ought to work. You know, ideas 
matter. If you've got good ideas, there are supplies of capital. 
Teamwork is terribly important. And where you come from and what you did 
before and who your father was and what your race is or what your gender 
is or what your sexual orientation is, they don't matter; ideas matter. 
Can you do something that makes the world a better place, that provides 
something that other people want that they can hook into? That's very 
important.
    I think--let me just give you one example that I had no earthly idea 
about until Steve told me tonight. It's a big joke in the White House 
that when I picked Al Gore to be my Vice 
President, I was trying to balance the ticket because he was 
technologically adept and I was technologically challenged. [Laughter]
    I'll never forget the first time I heard about eBay. I thought it 
was such a neat deal. I thought, now, that's something I'd like to do; 
that's my kind of deal. I like to buy and sell and swap and give things 
and do things. I'd love that. Steve told me tonight there are now 20,000 
Americans who do not work for eBay

[[Page 1653]]

who make a living doing transactions through eBay, 20,000 Americans, 
including all kinds of people who can now work at home, people who used 
to be on welfare, people--and he said that one of the people said this 
is capitalism for the rest of us.
    So with that background, let me say, when I started in 1992, it 
seemed to me that the problem with national politics was that it was 
frozen in time, but everything else was terrifically dynamic; that it 
was designed to take a bunch of people and politics in Washington, which 
is a long way from Palo Alto and a long way from everywhere else, a long 
way from Beltsville, Maryland, on some days--[laughter]--where there 
were lots of layers between the people there and real voters, and to 
structure voters' choices in such a way that they hoped would help the 
politicians, but had almost nothing to do with solving the problems of 
America. So you had to be a liberal or a conservative, or you had to be 
left or right, or you had to be for this position or that one or you 
weren't politically correct.
    We basically had a whole string of paralysis, and we found ourselves 
after 12 years of so-called supply-side economics having quadrupled the 
debt. We were economically paralyzed, and nobody wanted to raise taxes, 
and nobody wanted to cut spending. And as a consequence, we were slowly 
sort of squeezing the lifeblood out of our public life. No one could set 
priorities; nobody could make decisions; nobody would take chances. And 
it seemed to me that if you look at the things that worked in America, 
where we were leading the world in private sector endeavors, or if you 
looked at classrooms that worked that I had visited in the poorest 
places in America with high crime rates, and they still--there were 
classrooms in the early nineties that still had no dropouts, no 
violence, 100 percent of the kids going on to college, everybody 
performing well. They were different from most places like it, but they 
were working. They all rejected all those false choices.
    It seemed to me that's what America had to do. We had to say, 
``Look, we believe that we can reduce the deficit and balance the budget 
and still continue to invest in education and technology and the 
environment. We believe that we can help business and lift up working 
people at the same time. It's not an either/or thing. We believe we can 
grow the economy while we improve the environment. We don't think it's 
an either/or thing. We believe we can punish criminals who ought to be 
punished and prevent more crime and reduce the crime rate. We believe we 
can require able-bodied people on welfare to work, but do it in a way 
that helps them to become better parents, not worse parents, through 
medical care and nutrition and child care.'' And on and on and on.
    You can take any issue, but basically, what I wanted to do was to 
make America work the way the best of America was already working. And I 
wanted to hook America up to the future that so many of you are doing so 
much to make. And I wanted to clean out a lot of the sort of dead wood, 
accumulated dead wood of ideas and procedures and practices that were 
weighing Washington down.
    I remember--I think Bill Gates said once what 
I thought was kind of funny. He said, ``You know, our world works three 
times faster than normal business, and Washington works three times 
slower.'' [Laughter] ``That puts them behind by a factor of nine.'' 
There's a lot of truth in that. And so we set about to try to change the 
whole way Government works.
    And after 6\1/2\ years, you know the economic statistics. We have 
the lowest unemployment rate in 29 years; the lowest welfare rates in 32 
years; the lowest crime rates in 26 years; the lowest poverty rates, we 
learned yesterday, in 20 years; the lowest African-American poverty ever 
recorded. The first time we've had 2 years of budget surpluses in 42 
years. We also have--but some other things you ought to know. With the 
HOPE scholarships and the other additions to student aid and the changes 
in the student loan program, virtually anybody in America who is willing 
to work for it can get a college education. We have, thanks to Senator 
Barbara Boxer, begun to offer large numbers of 
young people the opportunity to go to after-school programs to stay off 
the streets and out of trouble and learn more. And that's very 
important.
    And during this time, we've raised the standards for clean air, for 
clean water, for safe food. We've cleaned up more toxic waste dumps, and 
the economy has gotten better, not worse, under what the sort of 
politically predictable right says is an unconscionable burden on the 
business community of cleaning up the environment.
    We have, as all of you know, a more activist Government, but the 
size of the Federal establishment, thanks largely to technological 
innovations spearheaded by the Vice President, is the

[[Page 1654]]

smallest it has been since John Kennedy was President in 1962. The 
Federal Government is the smallest it's been since 1962.
    So what I would like to say is, I feel that in the last 6\1/2\ 
years, we have at least prepared America for the 21st century. We've 
gotten things going again in the right direction. But the atmosphere in 
Washington is still entirely too partisan and entirely too ideological, 
driven largely by the majority party in Congress. Now, I would never say 
that any of us are totally blameless, but that's where most of the 
pressure is. And so we have a lot of things that don't make any sense to 
me going on there now.
    And let me say, what I think we should be doing is to build on what 
is happening now and ask ourselves, ``Okay, what are the biggest 
challenges out there, and how can we set in motion a framework that will 
allow the American people to meet those big challenges?'' And I'll just 
give you four or five real quick that I think are important and compare 
that with what's going on, and that will illustrate why it's important 
that you're here tonight.
    Number one, the number of people over 65 in this country is going to 
double in 30 years, as we baby boomers retire. I turn 65, if the Lord 
lets me live that long, in the year 2011, and I am the oldest of the 
baby boomers. So the baby boomers will all turn 65 between 2011 and 
2029. Now, when they do, at present participation rates in the work 
force, there will be two people working for every one person drawing 
Social Security. For most of us, it's no sweat because we'll have other 
ways of supporting our retirement. But Social Security still is 
responsible for lifting about half of our seniors out of poverty, even 
if they have other sources of income as well. So we have to make sure 
that when we retire, the cost of the baby boomers' retirement, since 
we're such a big generation, does not burden our children. This is not 
about older people; it's about our children and our grandchildren. I'm 
telling you, everybody I know my age is worried about this.
    So I asked the Congress to save the Social Security taxes but, as we 
pay down the debt, to give the interest savings that we get from saving 
the Social Security taxes, instead of spending them, to give the 
interest savings to the Social Security Trust Fund so we can run it out 
to 2050 and get it beyond the life expectancy of most of the baby boom 
generation, when things will right themselves again. This is a big deal. 
And if we can't do it now, when we're in such good shape financially, 
we'll never get a way around to doing it.
    The second thing we've got to deal with is Medicare. We're all going 
to be living longer. Any person that lives to be 65 today has a life 
expectancy of 82. The younger people in this audience, it is literally 
conceivable that those of you who are 35 or younger will have children 
who will have a life expectancy of nearly 100. That is literally true. 
By the time we get all the mysteries of the human genome decoded and we 
know how to raise children from infancy with adjusted diets for them and 
their genetic structure and all those things, and we have all the 
medical care and all the pharmaceuticals and all the research we're 
making into cancer, these kinds of things will happen.
    Now, in the meanwhile, we don't want Medicare to go broke. And 
interestingly enough, because Medicare was developed 30 years ago, when 
the world was a very different place, there is no prescription drug 
coverage for Medicare patients. Now, out here where biotech is a big 
deal, that must strike you as fundamentally absurd. You would never 
orchestrate, set up a program like that today without that. But three 
out of four seniors in this country don't have access to affordable 
prescription drugs. And the consequences are pretty catastrophic for 
some of them and enormously difficult in terms of burdens on the health 
care system. So I proposed a plan to fix that.
    The third thing we have to recognize is, we have the most diverse 
student body in the history of our schools in terms of race and religion 
and culture, and it is a godsend in a global economy if, but only if, 
they can all get a world-class education. And so we have to do that. But 
we know how to do that. I am telling you, I have been to schools in this 
country that have solved every problem you can mention in American 
education. But we have not systematized it. And the trick is how to have 
a system that has the right rewards and sanctions--just like the 
marketplace does--with enough creativity, just like your companies do, 
to let people solve these problems at the grassroots level. That's what 
we're trying to do.
    And let me just say two other things. The next big problem that 
particularly those of you who are younger will face--and I predict to 
you that for the next 30 years, we will be obsessed with trying to find 
a way to deal with

[[Page 1655]]

the challenge of climate change and to deal with--to get the world to 
give up another bad idea. We gave up supply-side economics now; nobody 
thinks that was a good idea anymore. We're all back to basic arithmetic. 
It's wonderful. It didn't have anything to do with the digital economy. 
We went back to arithmetic. [Laughter]
    But there is still all over, in America, in the Congress, in the 
business community, and all over the world in emerging societies, in 
China, India, other places, there are people that honestly believe you 
cannot have a modern economy without industrial age energy use patterns 
which are a prescription for environmental disaster in this country and 
around the world. And we have to abandon it. And a lot of the solutions 
will be found by people out here.
    But we have offered a market-oriented response to the challenge of 
climate change that I think is very important, and there are two more 
issues that I think are big deals because--and keep in mind, every one 
of these issues that I'm mentioning, there is a profound difference 
between where we stand and where the other party stands--two more 
issues. We've got to find a way to bring the benefits of free enterprise 
to people and places that haven't been touched by this recovery, and 
then we have to find a way to show people in other countries how to do 
the same thing. We know a little about this, but not a lot.
    But if 20,000 people can make a living trading on eBay, then we 
ought to be able to find a way to cure the 73-percent unemployment rate 
on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, even though 
they're physically separate from other people. We ought to be able to 
find a way to get all those poor communities in the Mississippi Delta 
that never recovered from the collapse of the agricultural culture that 
followed the impact of the Great Depression, to find economic 
opportunities that will reach those people. We ought to be able to find 
a way to get into Appalachia. We ought to be able to find a way to get 
into the inner cities, not just for this or that or the other individual 
but a critical mass of people that can create a real economy, a real 
market economy in these places.
    And finally, on the economic issues, I think we need a long-term 
commitment to setting an environment that will free you to do what you 
want to do. That's why I have said any tax cut we have should not 
interfere with our effort to pay off the publicly held debt of this 
country over the next 15 years to get us out of debt for the first time 
since 1835 when Andrew Jackson was President.
    Now, why would the allegedly more liberal party--and I say--or the 
actually more liberal party--be for paying the country out of debt? It's 
the progressive thing to do. Why? Because in a global economy where 
interest rates are set by global markets as well as by central banks, 
our ability to grow depends upon your ability to get money. And our 
ability to give people a good life depends upon their ability to finance 
their homes, their cars, their businesses, their college loans for their 
kids.
    And if we can get America out of debt, then, number one, we won't be 
crowding our own people, and interest rates will be lower here, which 
will mean higher growth and lower living costs for people; and, number 
two, when our friends get in trouble, as the Asian societies did a 
couple of years ago and we need to help them get back on their feet, 
they'll be able to get money at lower costs.
    This is a huge, big idea. For 30 years, everybody in my generation 
was taught in college that a country had to have a good deal of debt; it 
was a healthy thing. There's not a soul here over 35 years old that took 
any number of economic classes that wasn't told that in economics. And 
it was right, under the model that existed at the time. But in a global 
economy with global capital markets, if we can get this country out of 
debt, we ought to do it so you can continue to borrow to grow the 
economy and create opportunity for a generation. It will change the 
whole future of America for 30 years.
    The last thing I want to say is this. We must believe that all of 
America can be like this crowd of people standing in this yard tonight. 
That's why I'm for the employment nondiscrimination act. That's why I'm 
for the hate crimes legislation. That's why I started that--I've got a 
Presidential office on race now.
    I've spent so much of my time trying to make peace in the Middle 
East, trying to make peace in Northern Ireland, trying to stop the 
Bosnian Muslims and the Kosovar Albanians from being slaughtered, trying 
to give the Africans the capacity to avoid the future Rwandas. And all 
over the world, I see people in this so-called modern world where we're 
celebrating all of your modern ideas and your modern achievements--what

[[Page 1656]]

is the biggest problem in the world in America? We are dragged down by 
the most primitive of hatreds. It's bizarre. It's bizarre.
    We celebrate all these companies that are here, and we read about 
Matthew Shepard being strung up in Wyoming and James Byrd being dragged 
to death in Texas, and a crazy guy that belongs to a church--alleged 
church that believes not in God but in white supremacy--goes out and 
starts killing people of color in the Middle West, and another crazy guy 
goes and shoots a bunch of kids at a Jewish school and then guns down a 
Filipino postman in California. You think about it. It is unbelievable 
that at the dawn of a new millennium, where technology is changing the 
way we work and live and relate to each other and the rest of the world 
more than at any time in history by far, opening vistas of human 
possibilities no one could have dreamed of a few years ago, we are being 
paralyzed by primitive hatreds.
    And, therefore, I say to you the most important thing of all--more 
important than the economic policy, more important than anything else--
is that our Nation stand for the proposition that we believe in the 
innate dignity and equality of every human being, and anybody who is law 
abiding and hard working has a place at the American family table. That 
is the most important thing of all.
    So what are we fighting about in Washington? The Congress--first, 
they wanted to have a tax cut that would give away the entire non-Social 
Security surplus, which they said they could do without cutting 
anything. I vetoed that because it wasn't true and it wasn't 
responsible. Now, their own Congressional Budget Office says they've 
already spent $18 billion of the Social Security surplus this year, 
which proves that the tax cut couldn't be financed. And all they're 
doing, instead of coming and trying to work it out with me, is running 
television ads trying to say we're doing it even though we don't have a 
majority vote in Congress.
    Meanwhile, today Barbara Boxer spent all 
of her time fighting to keep our commitment to give the funds to the 
States and the school districts for 100,000 teachers so we can get class 
size down in the early grades, with the biggest student population we 
ever had in 1998. When the Congress passed it right before the election, 
all the Republicans went out and said, ``This is our kind of program: no 
bureaucracy, no problems, great things, smaller classes.'' Now they're 
trying to kill it because they don't want the Democratic administration 
to have any achievement that is demonstrable and tangible that changes 
the lives of people. It is the smallest kind of politics. And who cares 
what happens to the kids?
    So if you believe we have changed America for the better, then you 
should know--a lot of you have been my friends; you were there for me in 
the beginning, and I'm not on the ballot in the year 2000--but I want 
you to understand something. All I feel about this is gratitude. I am 
grateful that I had a chance to serve. I am grateful that I had a chance 
to play some role in this. But the reason we're around here after over 
220 years is that principles and ideas are more important than 
individuals.
    And that's why this Presidential race, that's why every Senate race, 
that's why every House race is so important. That's why your presence 
here is so important. So I implore you--I thank you for being here. I 
thank you for your contributions. It's a long way between now and the 
year 2000, but I'm telling you, every time you nodded your head tonight 
on every single issue I mentioned, there is a difference between where 
we stand and where they stand. So you stand with us and stand with us 
all the way until November 2000, and then we can make all of America 
more full of the things that you celebrate here in your own backyard.
    Thank you, and God bless you. Thank you.

Note: The President spoke at 7:20 p.m. at a private residence. In his 
remarks, he referred to reception hosts Tom Adams and Jeanne Lavan; 
reception cochairs Steve Westly, chief executive officer, eBay, and 
Chris Larsen, founder and chief executive officer, E-Loan; former Gov. 
Roy Romer of Colorado, former general chair, Beth Dozoretz, national 
finance chair, and Joseph J. Andrew, national chair, Democratic National 
Committee; Governor Romer's wife, Bea, and Ms. Dozoretz's husband, 
Ronald; Larry Stone, assessor, Santa Clara County, CA; and Bill Gates, 
chairman and chief executive officer, Microsoft Corp.