[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (1999, Book II)]
[July 15, 1999]
[Pages 1217-1220]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]
Remarks Following a Meeting With Members of S.A.F.E. Colorado and an
Exchange With Reporters
July 15, 1999
The President. Good afternoon. I want to welcome the groups of young
people from Colorado S.A.F.E. here to the White House, as well as those
who brought them here from Colorado, the co-leaders, David
Winkler and Ben Gelt. David will speak in a moment. And I want to say
again how grateful I am that these young people have come. Secretary
Summers and Attorney General Reno and I have just had a remarkable session.
It has now been 3 months since the horrible day in Littleton, since
the crack of gunfire and the cries and the funerals, and now, as the
shock and grief subside, as the cameras and satellite trucks move on to
different events, it might be easy to forget and to have the Nation
weaken its resolve to keep our children safe from gun violence. But
America must not forget that event or those which occurred in schools
last year or the fact that 13 of our children die every single day from
gun violence.
These young people represent millions of Americans who have come
together at the grassroots to take action. They have come to Washington
to hold our feet to the fire and to make their voices heard. And I thank
them for coming.
I have just had, as I said, a fascinating question-and-answer
session with these young people. They have asked good questions, and
they
[[Page 1218]]
have given good suggestions, and they are plainly impatient with the
lack of action on the important legislation before Congress.
This afternoon they will carry that same message to Capitol Hill. I
hope the Congress will listen very, very carefully to them. For the past
3 months, the gun lobby has been calling the shots on Capitol Hill. Now,
it's time for Congress to listen to the lobbyists who truly matter, our
children, the people who will be most affected by what is or is not done
by the Congress.
This is not a partisan issue out there in America, indeed not a
partisan issue anywhere but Washington. Americans of all ages, all
backgrounds, all political philosophies support strong legislation to
close dangerous loopholes in our gun laws. The vast majority of
Americans believe passionately that no criminal who has failed a Brady
background check and been refused a gun by an honest dealer should be
able to turn around and buy a gun at a gun show. Florida, hardly one of
our most liberal States, voted 72 percent in a referendum last November
to do just that.
We believe that every handgun should be made childproof with a
safety lock. We know that high-capacity ammunition gun clips are
designed for war, not hunting, and they have no place in the American
market. We believe any juvenile convicted of a violent crime should be
banned, as an adult would, from owning a handgun.
But 3 months after Columbine, Congress has yet to send me a bill to
make these commonsense gun reforms the law of the land. The Senate has
passed them, and though they died in the House, we still--we still--have
an opportunity to make them the law this year. I ask, as the young
people ask here today, don't forget Littleton; don't allow the victims
at Columbine to have died in vain; don't forget the 13 children who die
every day from gun violence. Many, many, many of them can be saved.
We must not lose the urgency of our mission. It is not too late. How
many more children must become victims of an illegal or poorly secured
weapon? How many more parents must be robbed of the opportunity to see
their children grow up into the fine young people we see standing behind
me today?
I ask Congress to end this delay and to send me a strong bill like
the one passed by the Senate. I ask Congress to reaffirm these young
people's faith in America, in our system of democracy. I ask Congress to
listen to the young lobbyists who will be on Capitol Hill today. Send
them home with the knowledge that Washington can hear their voices, too,
that men and women who serve in democracy's house, the U.S. Capitol,
truly serve the American people.
There are less than 2 months now before the start of a new school
year. Let's show all our children that when it comes to making their
classrooms and communities safe from gun violence, America did not take
a summer vacation. Let's show them that politics can stop at the
schoolhouse door, that this summer can be a season of progress and a
season of safety.
I again say, I wish every American could have seen and heard these
young people as the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Treasury, and
I have just done. I was impressed, amazed, and heartened. I ask the
Members of Congress to open their eyes, their hearts, their minds to
what they have to say.
Now I'd like to introduce one of the people who is most responsible
for all these fine young people being here today, the co-leader of this
S.A.F.E. trip, David Winkler.
David.
[At this point, David Winkler, co-leader of the Sane Alternatives to
Firearms Epidemic (S.A.F.E. Colorado) trip to Washington, DC, made brief
remarks.]
The President. Great job. That was terrific. Thank you.
Mr. Winkler. I want to thank all the
students for coming on this trip, and all of our chaperons for making it
possible. Thanks, guys. You all deserve a big hand. [Applause]
The President. I think if you all stayed a couple of weeks, we would
do very well. This is great. Thank you.
Yes.
Middle East and Northern Ireland Peace Processes
Q. Mr. President, a little bit later on today you will be meeting
with Prime Minister Barak, who has asked you to
take a step back from the peace process and let the parties work it out
for themselves. I'm wondering, first off, if you are considering--do you
think the time is right for him to do that? Conversely, do you think the
time is right for you to get back into, directly, the Northern Ireland
peace process?
[[Page 1219]]
The President. Well let me say first of all, on all these other
questions unrelated to this subject, as all of you know, I'm going to be
making a public statement with Prime Minister Barak later, and I will be
happy to answer questions then. I'm not sure that the way you've
characterized it is exactly what his request to me is going to be, so I
think I ought to wait until we are out there together.
On Northern Ireland, let me say that this is a difficult day for
those of us who have worked for years and who have worked over the last
several weeks. It is a particularly difficult day for Prime Minister
Blair and Prime Minister Ahern, who have performed heroic service, and it is hard for
most Americans, I'm sure, and most people throughout the world to
understand how a peace process could be stalled when both sides agree on
every element of the peace process and both sides agree on exactly what
they both have to do between now and next May. And the idea that this
whole thing could fall apart over an argument over who goes first,
sounds more reminiscent of something that might happen to these young
people in their school careers, 6 or 7 years earlier in their lives.
I mean, that's basically what's going on here, and you all need to
understand it. There is no difference of opinion here about what the
Good Friday accords require, what the communities of Ireland and
Northern Ireland have voted for, what they are all committed to do. They
are having a fight over who goes first, and acting today as if the whole
thing could be abandoned over that.
That cannot be allowed to happen. I do not believe it will be
allowed to happen. I believe there is too much invested in this, and I
believe sooner rather than later, we'll get this thing back on track.
But I've done what I could, along with the people in the communities
and the British and the Irish Prime Ministers; they have been wonderful. I don't know what
else they could have done. I don't know what else I could have done. But
I just don't believe, as far as we've come, that this thing is going to
come apart. This is not a good day for us, but I do not believe that
it's going to come apart, and we'll keep working on it.
And I'll answer the other questions later.
Gun Control Legislation
Q. On gun control, will you veto legislation from Capitol Hill on
juvenile justice if it does not contain a gun control provision?
The President. Well, I want to talk to the Attorney General about what else is in the bill, and I'd like to get her
advice on that before I make a final decision. But I'll tell you what I
will do: I will veto any legislation that appears to be gun control
legislation that actually weakens the law. I mean, one of the things
they were trying to do up there before was to actually go back and
weaken the pawnshop part of the law and say that if a criminal puts a
gun in a pawnshop and goes to jail, when they come back there shouldn't
be a background check if you're coming back to get your own gun at a
pawnshop. That's been the law for years and years, and they're even
trying to weaken that law.
So I will not, in any way, shape, or form, countenance a weakening
of the law. I will do whatever I think--I'll tell you the answer to
that--I will do whatever I am convinced is best to increase the chances
that we can pass responsible legislation to protect our children from
guns, to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them.
That's what I will do.
But in terms of the details, I think the Attorney General will have to give me a briefing on it before I can make
a final decision.
Thank you, and I'll see you in a couple of hours. Thank you.
Patients' Bill of Rights
Q. Patients' Bill of Rights?
The President. It's still a good bill. I'm bewildered by that,
actually. I mean, I don't see how the majority is going to explain--we
had 100 percent of our caucus and a couple from theirs, and I listened
to the debate, and it still doesn't make any sense to me. All they can
say is--either they can say, ``We just don't want doctors to be able to
refer their patients to specialists, or people to be able to stop at the
first emergency room, or women to be able to keep their gynecologist
throughout a pregnancy, or people with cancer to be able to keep their
oncologist throughout a chemotherapy treatment,'' or they have to say
what the health insurers are saying, which is, ``Oh, this is going to
really raise premiums.''
[[Page 1220]]
The problem with their argument and all these millions of dollars
they're spending on their advertising is that the Congressional Budget
Office, which as you know--all of you know this now--for more than 4
years the Republican majority has held up as the sole authority on
anything having to do with money in Washington, DC; they have held it up
as an icon, and the Congressional Budget Office tells them that, at
most, this could raise premiums $2 a month.
So the health insurers have paid advertisement that says something
different from their own Congressional Budget Office, and so now,
they're only too happy to abandon the Congressional Budget Office that
they waved in front of us like a sacred body for 4\1/2\ years.
So I don't know what's going on there. I know one thing--again,
that's just like gun violence--you go out into this country and you will
find 70 percent of Republicans, Democrats, and independents who believe
in the provisions of the Patients' Bill of Rights; and you tell them
that Congress says it will cost 2 bucks a month, the Federal Government
experience is it costs less than one dollar a month, and the numbers
will stay solid.
So there's something else going on here. And all I can say is I'm
going to keep working for a good one. And I just--this is--this one is
truly beyond me. I figure when the Congressional Budget Office came up
after they had nourished it as the end-all and be-all of financial
wisdom for 5 years, or nearly 5 years, that we would be home free and we
could pass this in a bipartisan fashion, and the health insurers won't
let them do it. That's really what's going on. They won't let them do
it, and I think it's a sad day for health care in America. But we're not
done yet, and this won't die.
Thank you.
2000 Election
Q. Are you being overly protective of Mr. Gore's campaign, sir?
You've agreed to raise funds for him, and you took a shot at Mr. Bush
yesterday. How do you respond?
The President. That's--I have nothing to say about that. Everything
I said yesterday was in complete good spirits, and everyone that was
there knew that we were all having a very good time--that we were all
having a good time, and I think we ought to lighten up here on the
politics and focus on the work.
You know, we're going to have an election in November and then
you'll have somebody else to chew on after 2001. But between now and
then, everyone who is in Congress and everyone who is in the executive
branch is drawing a paycheck every 2 weeks, from them and their parents.
They're paying us to go to work, and what we need to do is to be less
obsessed with the politics and more obsessed with substance and deal
with these issues.
And what I was trying to do yesterday was basically cut the
atmosphere a little bit, give us something to laugh about--which they
did--and then talk for a good period of time, probably more than a half
hour, about the issues that are before us. I want us to focus on the
work to be done. There's plenty of time later to worry about that. All
of us that are drawing a check ought to be doing the people's business
now.
Thank you.
Note: The President spoke at 12:25 p.m. on the South Lawn at the White
House. During the exchange, he referred to Prime Minister Ehud Barak of
Israel; Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom; and Prime
Minister Bertie Ahern of Ireland.