    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: WILLIAM J. CLINTON (1999, Book II)]
    [August 6, 1999]
    [Pages 1394-1398]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at the Arkansas Broadcasters Association's 50th Anniversary
    Dinner in Little Rock, Arkansas
    August 6, 1999

        Thank you very much. Congratulations on your 50th anniversary. And
    thank you for honoring my friend and my partner James Lee Witt.
        You know, Bobby--I was wondering what
    Bobby would say. I thought he would say, ``You know, I knew I could
    guilt Bill Clinton into coming to this dinner once I found out he was
    going to be in Arkansas and I reminded him how many early-morning radio
    interviews I'd given him over the last 20 years.'' And I want to thank
    Bobby Caldwell, who is my longtime friend, and all of you for the work
    that you do, as well as for honoring a wonderful man tonight.
        I am honored to be joined by Rodney Slater, and I know there are others here in our administration,
    Kay Goss, Buddy Young; and people who were in our administration in
    Arkansas, like Bill and Judy Gaddy, are here, and many others that I haven't had a chance to
    see. I thank the members of the legislature who are here, Steve
    Faris and Don House;
    and Bud Harper, who has the job that James
    Lee used to have and, like James Lee, used to
    be a county judge, and therefore, was prepared for it.
        And I want to acknowledge my good friend John Paul Katz, who served as Speaker of the House when I was Governor.
    And also, James Lee's family; James Lee and
    Lea Ellen have done a great job, and you know
    they're building a political dynasty in Yell County, and if your last
    name is not Witt, you can't be county judge in Yell County anymore--
    [laughter]--not ever.
        Let me say that--I know most of this has been said, but I want to
    say a few things about James Lee and what he
    represents in terms of what I've tried to do as your President. This is
    one of the best times in American history, but when it comes to weather,
    it's been one of the worst. Since 1993, we've had the worst flood of the
    century in the Midwest; the worst earthquake in Northridge, California;
    weather disasters in places they weren't supposed to happen. We've had
    tornadoes in Minnesota, ice storms in Florida. And now the farm crops
    are burning up, not in the South, but in the East

    [[Page 1395]]

    and the Northeast, where today we acknowledged the worst drought ever
    for the farmers from Maryland to New Jersey to Rhode Island.
        We have had in total more than 250 natural disasters in all 50
    States and territories. And many of them have cost a lot of human lives.
        Well, the old saying that God doesn't send you anything you can't
    handle was made true from the point of view of my administration and
    millions of Americans because James Lee Witt
    agreed to be head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
        I got this idea. I have to tell you, when I went to Florida as a
    candidate for President and I saw the enormous anxiety that people felt
    in the aftermath of the terrible hurricane, where their whole lives had
    been wrecked, and I talked to Senator Pryor
    about this--I remember this very clearly--that people kept saying the
    Federal Government is not working; they're not helping; I don't know
    what they're doing; they're taking too long; they act bureaucratic. You
    know, just one thing after another. And I realized what the problem was,
    and that is that for decades, through Democratic and Republican
    administrations alike, the Federal Emergency Management Agency was
    treated like a political appointment, and normally the person who got it
    was somebody who wanted something else, who was a big supporter of the
    President, but couldn't quite become an Ambassador to a European country
    or couldn't quite get a position in the Cabinet. I took care of that by
    putting FEMA in the Cabinet.
        And all these people that had this job were good people. They were
    not bad people; they were good people. And there were all these
    dedicated professionals who were working day in and day out. But there
    was no one at the helm who wanted the job and who had experience in what
    the job was and who could put every fiber of his being into dealing with
    people in the most difficult times imaginable.
        And, you know, when I was Governor and James Lee was head of the office of emergency services here, we had
    horrible floods; we had tornadoes that leveled little towns. I remember
    going over to West Memphis when the whole place was decked and the glass
    had been shattered at the dog track and glass was flying through the air
    over there at more than 100 miles an hour. Just a miracle that we didn't
    have lots of people killed by something that was just like a hail of
    bullets.
        And I knew that he cared what happened to people when they were
    running tight, and I knew he knew that people were frustrated, they were
    angry, they were disoriented, when they'd lost everything in the world.
    And we needed somebody who actually had that kind of experience and that
    kind of ability doing this job.
        You know, when everything is going along all right, most people
    think of the Cabinet of the President as the Secretary of State,
    Secretary of Defense, and the Attorney General, and maybe if you're from
    Arkansas, you think about the Secretary of Agriculture. But when your
    house is blown away and when your community is buried in water, the most
    important person in the Federal Government is the person that heads the
    Federal Emergency Management Agency.
        And because of all the things we've been through as a nation in
    natural disasters in the last 6 years, James Lee Witt has very often been the most important person in the
    Federal Government to tens of millions of Americans.
        I kid him every time we have a disaster
    someplace, 3 weeks later there's another State he could be elected to
    State office in. When we went through all this terrible thing in
    southern California with that earthquake--they think of themselves as a
    big, modern place, and a lot of them, actually, are from places like
    Arkansas, but they forget it from time to time. And he gave them a whole
    new take on what it was to have a grassroots sense of common sense and
    compassion.
        So I can just tell you that I think we're going to have more of
    these difficult natural problems, and I think we're going to have a lot
    of challenges to meet. But it will be a long, long time before any
    Federal official ever has this position who can remotely equal James
    Lee for his experience, his knowledge, his
    ability, and his compassion. He has served America well, and he has done
    Arkansas proud.
        I'd just like to take advantage of the fact that you gave me this
    podium to give you a brief report on a couple of other things, by using,
    if I might, James Lee. The way he runs FEMA
    and the way he conducts his business is the way I believe the Federal
    Government as a whole should be run, that we should basically put people
    ahead of politics and power.
        Now, all you've got to do is read the paper every day or listen to
    the news to know that

    [[Page 1396]]

    that's not the way Washington works and that's not the way some people
    who report about Washington want it to work, because they think it would
    be immensely boring if it did, I think. But James Lee is exhibit A of the kind of Government we've tried to
    bring to Washington. So is Rodney, I might
    add.
        You have these two Arkansans serving with great distinction, by the way, who are
    quite popular with both Republicans and Democrats in the United States
    Congress, both of them, because they treat people decently; they give
    them a quick answer; they shoot straight. They don't say yes when the
    answer is no, but they try to say yes whenever they can. And they are
    very well thought of. And they don't become the kind of lightning rods
    that normally just titillate the day-to-day coverage of politics in
    Washington.
        I believe, out here in the country there is a national consensus
    around a vital center for America moving forward. It crosses party lines
    on nearly everything. I believe it exists nearly everywhere except in
    Washington.
        I'll just give you one example, this debate we're having over the
    Patients' Bill of Rights. I have supported health maintenance
    organizations. I have supported managed care as a way of holding down
    the costs of health care. Let's not forget, in 1993 when I took office,
    health care costs for several years had been going up at 3 times the
    rate of inflation. And they threatened to absolutely engulf the budgets
    of businesses and of families. But I also believe that you can't manage
    a system if you forget what the primary mission of the system is. In
    this case, it is to improve the health care of the American people.
        Now, I believe if you went out to anyplace in Arkansas, I think if
    you took an exhaustive survey, if you polled 20,000 people here in
    Pulaski County, or in any part of our State, and you divided them
    properly among the parties, you would find overwhelming support for the
    idea that every American in an HMO ought to have the right to see a
    specialist if their doctor tells them they need to see a specialist.
        And in a lot of big cities, believe it or not, when people have
    accidents, when the ambulance picks them up, they have to go by two or
    three emergency rooms until they get to one in a hospital that's
    covered. Well, if it's you in the back of that ambulance, you want to go
    to the first emergency room you come to. You don't want to have to bump
    two or three until you get to one that just happens to be in a plan.
        And a lot of you run small businesses. And small businesses that do
    provide health insurance for their employees often have to change
    providers, and they have to look around, from time to time, for the most
    cost-effective provider. But if there's an employee in that business
    who's in the sixth month of a difficult pregnancy, or in the middle of a
    chemotherapy treatment, I think that those people ought to be able to
    keep their doctors until the treatment is finished. These are just
    basic, simple things. And I think 70 percent of the American people
    agree.
        Now, there is a glimmer of good news. About 20 Republicans in the
    House of Representatives--including all of their doctors, about a half
    dozen of them--have said they want to help us pass this. And I hope we
    can get it done. But the fact that we've been fighting for it for nearly
    2 years is an example--we'd never have a 2-year fight over this in the
    Arkansas legislature. We just wouldn't do it, because it would be such a
    clear, human, basic thing that we'd figure out how to get it done
    without imposing undue burdens on the businesses involved.
        And that's what we have to do in Washington. If you take the debate
    we're having over the surplus today, I know it may just seem like
    politics to you, but believe me, it is not to me. It's about everything
    I've tried to stand for and do since I went up there. Just remember,
    when I went to Washington, we'd been running on a balanced budget down
    here for 12 years, and they had quadrupled the debt in 12 years. And we
    had--the deficit was $290 billion and projected to be $390 billion this
    year. And we were able to turn it around by arithmetic, which meant we
    have to make hard and controversial decisions, and a lot of Members of
    my party lost their seats in Congress in the '94 election because they
    voted to reduce the deficit.
        But just today, before I came down here, we announced that we have
    gone over 19 million new jobs since January of 1993--19 million--the
    longest peacetime expansion in history; the highest homeownership in
    history; the lowest minority unemployment ever recorded; a million and a
    half fewer children in poverty. Record numbers of new small businesses
    have started in every single year. The air is cleaner; the water is
    cleaner; the food is safer; there

    [[Page 1397]]

    are fewer toxic waste dumps. We've got 90 percent of our kids immunized
    against serious childhood illnesses for the first time in the history of
    the United States.
        We've set aside more land to be preserved forever than any
    administration, except those of the two Roosevelts. We've got 100,000
    young people that have served their country in AmeriCorps in their
    communities, earned money for college. The HOPE scholarship essentially
    guarantees that everybody can have at least 2 years of college; and
    already, 15 million people have taken advantage of it; 12.5 million
    people have taken advantage of the family and medical leave law.
        This country is a stronger country because we have looked to the
    future and tried to put people first, tried to keep thinking about
    what's best for tomorrow. And that's what this whole debate is about.
    But I just want to give you my take on it. And it's exactly the same
    attitude I'd have if I were still Governor sitting here watching it go
    on.
        This country quadrupled our debt in the 12 years before I took
    office. We have turned that around, but we're looking toward a 21st
    century in which, among other things, the following will happen. I'll
    just give you two things. Number one, the number of people over 65 is
    going to double in 30 years when the baby boomers all get into the
    retirement age. Right now Medicare is supposed to go broke in 15 years;
    Social Security is supposed to go broke in 33 years, 34 years. We are
    not prepared for the aging of America.
        Number two, we've got the largest number of children in our school
    system we have ever had--bigger than the baby boom generation--and we
    have the largest percentage of them who come from all different kinds of
    backgrounds.
        I saw an article in the Christian Science Monitor the other day that
    said Arkansas was one of the two States in the country with the fastest
    growing Hispanic populations. And nobody really believes seriously that
    we're giving every one of our children a world-class education. But our
    future as a nation, and those of us who are baby boomers, the security
    of our retirement depends upon our ability to educate all of our
    children.
        Now, here's what I think about this surplus. First of all, it's only
    going to materialize if we have a good economic policy. And secondly,
    only if we have a good economic policy will any tax cut be worth a plug
    nickel to anybody.
        So what I think we ought to do is meet the big challenges of the
    country. And I'll just mention three. Number one, we ought to save
    Social Security and strengthen Medicare and provide a modest
    prescription drug benefit to the three-quarters of the seniors in this
    country that don't have access to it.
        Two, we ought to decide how much money we have to invest in our
    future, in everything from education to national defense, the
    environment, to things that are important in Arkansas--veterans' health
    care. We have to put some more money into the university teaching
    hospitals. Everybody agrees with this up there. And we've got to do
    something about the farm problem. It's about time that we admitted that
    '95 farm bill, as I said when I signed it, reluctantly, had no safety
    net and will not work in bad economic times. It doesn't work, and we
    ought to fix that. But it costs money. So we need to figure out how many
    other things we have to invest in.
        And then the third thing we ought to do, in my opinion, is to save
    enough of this surplus for Social Security and Medicare that we actually
    pay this country's debt off. We can be out of debt, in 15 years, for the
    first time since 1835. And if we do that, that means in every community
    represented in this room, lower interest rates for businesses, for home
    mortgages, for college loans, for credit cards, for car payments. It
    means that the children in this room will grow up into an economy that
    is much stronger than it otherwise would have been.
        Now, can you imagine what people would have said and thought of me
    if I had gone out in 1992 and said, ``Now, I want you to vote for me,
    and 7 years later I'll come back, and we'll have a little talk about
    what to do with the surplus and getting America out of debt.'' They
    would have said, ``You know, that young fellow from Arkansas is a nice
    young man, but he's deluded, and we need to send him home.'' [Laughter]
    But that's where we are today, because people like David Pryor put their political necks on the line and stood up
    and did the right thing.
        And I'm just telling you--I see this now in the broad history of our
    country. A generation gets a chance like this maybe once in a lifetime.
    The World War II generation, they did for us

    [[Page 1398]]

    by getting us through the Depression and winning the war and saving the
    world for freedom. And now what we're being asked to do is to look down
    the road and think of the long-term interest of America, and the
    strength of our country in good times and bad, and do what's right for
    our children.
        If you save Social Security and Medicare, when those of us in the
    baby boom retire, we won't have to burden our children with our
    retirement and undermine their ability to invest in our grandchildren.
    If you invest in education, we'll have a stronger economy. And if you
    pay the debt off, we'll sure have a stronger economy, by far, than we
    otherwise would have.
        So here's my simple idea. I know this sounds simple, but why don't
    we figure out what we've got to do for Social Security and Medicare? Why
    don't we figure out what--even the Republicans, they're up there
    spending all the money--what they want to spend on everything from
    education to agriculture and veterans and what it takes to pay the debt
    off? There will be some money left, and give it back to the America
    people in a tax cut.
        But this debate, it's all backwards, you know. They're up there
    giving the money away with no Medicare plan, nothing to extend the life
    of the Social Security Trust Fund, ignoring the commitments that they
    want to make in everything from defense to veterans to agriculture, with
    no prospect of paying the debt off.
        One of the young men that works for me said this is kind of like a
    family sitting down at dinner and talking about what they're going to do
    for the summer and deciding they're going to have the vacation of their
    lifetimes; they're going to just blow it out. And when they get home
    from this month-long vacation, they'll see if they can pay the home
    mortgage and send the kids to college. That's exactly what is going on
    here.
        And it is not partisan, from my point of view. I'm not running for
    anything. But when I come home here, and we put that library up down on
    the river, and I'm looking at the next generation of young people and
    trying to bring people from all over the world here to see our State and
    to talk about what we did and what we still need to do in our country
    and in our world, I want to go to bed every night knowing that we did
    everything we could to give the children in this room the 21st century
    they deserve.
        So I ask all of you, as you watch this debate unfold. We can't even
    have this argument about how big the tax cut should be until we have met
    our fundamental obligations to you and to our future. I will work with
    the Republicans; keep in mind, we passed the Balanced Budget Act in '97;
    we passed welfare reform in 1996, in the teeth of the election. And I
    would remind you that we have now cut the welfare rolls in half; they're
    the lowest they've been in 32 years.
        So we are capable of working together up there across party lines.
    But we can't forget about common sense and basic arithmetic. And we need
    to maintain the spirit of kindness and concern and humility that James
    Lee Witt has brought to that FEMA office
    every day he's been there. And I hope that, in whatever way you can, you
    will get that message out to the people who listen to you, because a lot
    of people do, and we've got an awful lot riding on it.
        Thank you, and God bless you.

    Note: The President spoke at 9:16 p.m. in the Ambassador's Ballroom at
    the Embassy Suites Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to Bobby Caldwell,
    member, board of directors, Arkansas Broadcasters Association; Raymond
    Lloyd (Buddy) Young, Region VI Director, Federal Emergency Management
    Agency; William Gaddy, former director, Arkansas Employment Security
    Division, and his wife, Judy Gaddy, former special assistant to the
    Governor; State Representatives Steve Faris and Don R. House; W.R. (Bud)
    Harper, director, Arkansas Office of Emergency Services; Lea Ellen Witt,
    wife of Federal Emergency Management Agency Director James Lee Witt; and
    former Senator David H. Pryor.