[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1998, Book II)]
[September 24, 1998]
[Pages 1659-1662]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Reception
September 24, 1998

    Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, first of all, I don't 
know if you can feel it, but I'm even happier to see you than you are to 
be here. [Laughter] I want to say--you remember that famous quote 
attributed to Harry Truman, ``If you want a friend in Washington, get a 
dog''? [Laughter] Well, I got a dog, and I love him very much, but I'm 
glad to have you in the White House here tonight. I feel that I have 
friends here.
    I want to thank all the previous speakers. I thank Maria Echaveste 
and John Podesta for the magnificent work they do for you and the 
American people every day. I thank Steve Grossman and Roy Romer for 
taking over our party at what was a financially perilous time,

[[Page 1660]]

bringing us back to health, and helping to set up the organization, the 
structure, and the effort that has led to this incredibly talented and 
diverse array of people being here tonight representing the Democratic 
Party from every corner of our land.
    I want to thank the Vice President. I've said this many times--the 
historians may argue about whether they agree with what I have done or 
not--there is one fact about our administration that is absolutely 
beyond any historical argument. The Vice President of the United States 
has had more influence over more decisions in more areas of our life and 
done more good by far than any person who has ever held that position in 
the history of the United States.
    I want to thank Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee from Houston for 
being here and for being a stalwart supporter of our programs and 
initiatives. She's a great leader. I, too, join in thanking John Sweeney 
and all the members of the labor movement who are here for the 
incredible energy and direction and drive they have given to their 
movement and to our country.
    I know we have a number of mayors here. I think Mayor Hammer from 
San Jose and Mayor Pastrick from East Chicago are here. If there are any 
other mayors who are here, I'm sorry I didn't call your name, but I love 
you anyway. [Laughter]
    Let me say, you all know why we're here, but I would like to set the 
stage here. I, too, thank you for your role in what we have been able to 
do. Next week will mark the seventh anniversary--I can't believe this--
the seventh anniversary of the day I announced my candidacy for 
President, October 3, 1991. Now, I said then that I was running because 
I wanted America to have a mission and a vision for the 21st century, to 
preserve the American dream, to restore the hopes of the forgotten 
middle class, to reclaim the future for our children. Even then I did 
not know that 7 years later, through two long elections and various 
trials and tribulations, I would be able to say that we have the lowest 
unemployment rate in 28 years, the lowest crime rate in 25 years, the 
smallest percentage of our people on welfare in 29 years, next week the 
first balanced budget and surplus in 29 years; that we would, with the 
HOPE scholarship, tax credits for all higher education, deductibility of 
student loans, more Pell grants, we would have opened the doors of 
college education to all Americans; that we would have protected the 
environment, passed the Brady bill, almost finished putting our 100,000 
police on the street, the family and medical leave law, the Kennedy-
Kassebaum bill; that we'd have cleaner water, cleaner air, safer food, 
fewer toxic waste dumps. That's all to the good, and I am very, very 
grateful for the chance to have served, for the chance that Hillary and 
I have had to live here and work. And by the way, she's out on the trail 
tonight and wishes she could be here, as has already been said.
    But I want to say to you also, you're here to look to the future, 
because the real question is, what are we going to do with this moment 
we have; what shall we do with this moment of prosperity and confidence?
    The people in the other party believe they're going to whip us with 
M&M's in this election. [Laughter] That stands for money. They've got a 
lot of it. If you kill the legislation designed to protect our kids from 
the dangers of tobacco and you kill campaign finance reform, you can get 
yourself a good chunk of change. And they'll have more money than we do, 
even though we're working hard to close the gap.
    The other thing they'll have is midterms. Why should midterms 
matter? Because they think, ``Well, our people will feel good, but 
they'll be complacent.'' And our people don't make as much money, don't 
have as much free time, have to go to more trouble to vote. And 
normally, we Democrats get a much bigger vote during Presidential 
elections than we do in these off-year elections.
    Now, our enemy is not adversity. Adversity is our friend. Our enemy 
is complacency. And so I say to you: I'm glad you're here; I'm glad you 
cheered me; I'm glad you're having a good time. But I want you to be 
serious just for a minute. You've heard what they've all said. What have 
we done since January, when I have pleaded for the chance to work with 
the Republicans to build this country for the 21st century, when I have 
said, ``Why should education be a partisan issue; why should the 
Patients' Bill of Rights be a partisan issue? '' People show up in the 
emergency room--you don't have to show your party registration.
    How can the environment be a partisan issue? We all breathe the same 
air and drink the same water. How can keeping our economic growth going 
by preventing this financial contagion that's engulfing so much of the 
rest of the world

[[Page 1661]]

from hitting any more countries that are our trading partners, or from 
eventually biting us--how can that possibly be a partisan issue? Shoot, 
I bet Republicans have made even more money than Democrats have out of 
me being President. [Laughter] How can that be a partisan issue?
    How can saving Social Security before we just go out and start 
spending the surplus to make votes with a tax cut in an election year be 
a partisan issue? We've been waiting for 29 years; I've been working for 
6 years on this. I told you we'd get rid of it. And now, before the red 
ink turns to black and dries, they want to start spending the money 
again. And you know and I know when the baby boomers retire, there will 
only be two people working for every one person drawing Social Security, 
if all the present trends continue.
    Now, this is a big deal. Half the people on Social Security today 
have been lifted out of poverty because of Social Security. Now, we 
don't have to do anything about it, we can go ahead and run it in the 
ditch if you want to. And when we do, we'll have two choices: We can 
either tax our children to pay for our retirement and undermine their 
ability to raise our grandchildren; or we can decide we can't possibly 
do that, and we can slash benefits hugely and have a lot of elderly 
people living in poverty again. Or we can say, ``I don't care if it's 
just a few weeks before the election; I've been waiting 29 years for a 
balanced budget. We're going to have a surplus now, and before we spend 
it on indulgences or even things we need for ourselves, we ought to save 
Social Security and avoid those bad alternatives.''
    Now, that's what this is about. So--I'm just telling you: They've 
got money; they've got midterms. But we have the issues. And you need to 
go home and ask people a simple question: ``Do you like where we are? 
Are we better off than we were 6 years ago?'' And they'll say yes. ``Do 
you really believe we've met the long-term challenges of the country? Do 
you think there's nothing left to be done?'' And they'll say no. And 
then you can say, ``You can choose partisanship, or you can choose 
progress. You can choose power, or you can choose people. You can choose 
politics, or you can choose principle. But if you stay home, you're 
choosing all the wrong things. You can't stay home.'' We need to go out 
and say, ``Look, we stand for saving Social Security for the 21st 
century. We're not against tax cuts in the President's budget. There are 
tax cuts for child care, for education, for the environment. But they're 
all paid for.''
    We stand for taking average class sizes down to 18, and putting--in 
the early grades--and putting 100,000 teachers out there. We stand for 
higher standards, and we stand for stopping social promotion. But we 
don't want to hurt kids, so we want every child who needs it to be able 
to have an after-school program and a summer school program. And we want 
to pay the college expenses of 35,000 bright young people and let them 
pay off all that money by going into the inner cities and teaching and 
helping our children and lifting them up. That's what we stand for. We 
stand for building or repairing 5,000 schools. We stand for hooking 
every classroom in the country, not just the wealthiest ones, up to the 
Internet. That's what we stand for.
    And we stand for a Patients' Bill of Rights that affects everybody, 
without regard to their partisan affiliation. If you walked out of here 
tonight and you got hit by a car, wouldn't you like to go to the nearest 
emergency room instead of being carried 5 or 6 miles because your plan 
required it? If you go to the doctor next month and he said, ``I'm 
sorry, you've got a condition I can't treat. I want to send you to a 
specialist,'' wouldn't you like the doctor be able to do that and not 
have an accountant be able to stop that doctor? If you work for a small 
business and your employer changes health care providers when you're 6 
months pregnant, wouldn't you like to keep your obstetrician until your 
baby is born? If somebody in your family is having chemotherapy, don't 
you think they ought to be able to finish the treatment before they have 
to change doctors?
    This is not idle--we're talking about real stuff here. There are 160 
million Americans in managed care plans and millions more who could be 
affected by this. I've been through this, and I bet a lot of you have. 
You have somebody in your family who is taking chemotherapy, and you sit 
around trying to laugh about it. You try to make jokes about whether 
you're going to lose your hair or not or when you're going to get sick. 
How in goodness name could we ever justify letting any system prevail 
where you could say, ``I'm sorry, you're midway through your treatment. 
Now go see Dr. Jones.''
    And don't you think your medical records ought to be private?

[[Page 1662]]

    Now, let me just tell you what this is about. That's what this 
election is about. We had a bill that did that. In the House the 
Republicans passed a bill that didn't guarantee the emergency room, 
didn't guarantee the specialist, didn't guarantee your treatment 
couldn't be interrupted, didn't guarantee your privacy, and left 100 
million Americans out of what little bit it did do. And in the Senate, 
when they tried to bring up our bill, the Senate was so concerned that 
they would have to vote against our bill to stay with the insurance 
companies that the leader of the Senate shut the Senate down for 4 hours 
in a panic, so it could die by stealth.
    Now, that's what this election is about: real people, somebody 
making a minimum wage. That's worth going out to vote for--killing the 
minimum wage at a time when we have low unemployment and low inflation, 
when we all believe in the principle that everyone should participate in 
this prosperity--12 million people who are working hard, not on welfare, 
trying to do their part, paying their taxes.
    We've got an economic program up there that the Vice President and 
Secretary Cuomo developed to put more investment, more free enterprise 
jobs in inner-city areas and rural areas and on Indian reservations 
where people haven't felt this recovery. If we can't give them a chance 
to be part of the American dream now, with the lowest unemployment rate 
in 28 years, when in the world will we ever get around to doing it? When 
will we ever do it?
    Look, this is serious. You need to go back home and say, every time 
you see one of their ads on television, you say to yourself, ``Well, why 
did you kill the education program? Why did you kill the Patients' Bill 
of Rights? Why did you kill the environmental initiatives? Why did you 
kill campaign finance reform? Why did you kill the tobacco legislation? 
Why did you kill minimum wage? What are we doing here anyway?''
    This is a better country today because we have worked on the 
people's needs. And whenever we could, we have reached out to the 
Republicans and invited them to join us. They made all these decisions 
this year, not me. They have been in the majority.
    With all this financial turmoil going on around the world, I have 
asked for 8 long months to simply pay our contribution to the 
International Monetary Fund, just so we could grow and keep growing and 
keep creating American jobs.
    So I say to you, I want you to go home, and I want you to tell 
everybody the country is doing well, we're better off than we were 6 
years ago because we followed the right policies. But we've got a lot to 
do. We've got to save Social Security first. We've got to give our kids 
the best schools in the world. We've got to pass the Patients' Bill of 
Rights. We've got to keep improving the environment. We've got to keep 
this economic growth going.
    Now, if you want progress, vote for us; if you want partisanship, 
vote for them. If you want to vote for people, vote for us; if you want 
to vote for politics, vote for them. We'll prove M&M's doesn't amount to 
anything compared to the principle, the power, and the passion of the 
American people and the people's party.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 7:35 p.m. in the East Room at the White 
House. In his remarks, he referred to Steve Grossman, national chair, 
and Gov. Roy Romer of Colorado, general chair, Democratic National 
Committee; John J. Sweeney, president, AFL-CIO; Mayor Susan Hammer of 
San Jose, CA; and Mayor Robert Pastrick of East Chicago, IN.