    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1998, Book I)]
    [June 16, 1998]
    [Pages 971-975]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Dinner
    June 16, 1998

        Thank you very much. First of all, I want to thank Herb and Patrice for having us
    here--first in their beautiful home, now in this beautiful tent--sitting
    on these wonderful chairs. [Laughter] I have great feelings about
    Denmark and recently had a wonderful visit there.
        I'd like to thank my good friend Governor
    Romer--and my colleague of many years--and Len Barrack for their work for our party; our former chairman,
    Don Fowler, is here; Carol Pensky, thank you for being here. And I'd like to thank the
    California Members of Congress, Representatives Becerra, Filner, and Sanchez, for coming.
        And I want to thank Herb and many of you
    also in this room for your real passionate concern for the District of
    Columbia. I have never been around Herb Miller--and I've been around him
    a lot--I have never been around him when he didn't talk about DC. First
    I thought maybe he's a shy man who had limited interests. [Laughter]
    Then I realized he was a passionate man who was determined to change the
    future of this city, and I was mightily impressed.
        Let me make just a couple of comments, one of which bears at least
    indirectly on the District of Columbia. In 1992, when I was running for
    President, in the beginning when only my mother thought I could win, I
    was the fifth best known candidate in New Hampshire. I ran because I was
    genuinely concerned about our country, because I didn't think we were
    moving in the right direction and I didn't think we had a unifying
    vision or a strategy to achieve the vision. And I knew what I wanted. I
    wanted this country to get ready for this new century and this whole new
    way of living and working and relating to each other.
        And I believed that in order to do it, we would have to dramatically
    reinvigorate the system by which all Americans are given opportunity if
    they're responsible enough to work for it. I believed we would have to
    broaden our attitudes about freedom and equality. I believed we would
    have to strengthen the bonds of our

    [[Page 972]]

    national community. I thought we would have to renew our commitment to
    lead in the world and take some tough decisions in places like Haiti and
    Bosnia and Northern Ireland and the Middle East if we expected to move
    the country--and the world--toward a better tomorrow.
        And you know, tonight I am very, very grateful that this country has
    the lowest crime rate in 25 years, the lowest unemployment rate in 28
    years, the lowest welfare rolls in 29 years. We're about to have the
    first balanced budget and surplus in 29 years, the lowest inflation rate
    in 32 years, the smallest Federal Government in 35 years, and the
    highest homeownership in the history of the country. I am very grateful
    for that.
        But let me say, I say that not to be self-serving, because I can't
    claim all the credit for that. Most of the credit goes to the American
    people, all of you, and the billions of decisions that are made here
    every day. But it matters what the direction of the country is. It
    matters what the driving policies of the country are. And if ideas are
    translated into action, they have consequences.
        So I'm proud of my party, too. I'm proud of the fact that we said we
    were going to leave behind the old, outdated political fights of the
    past, that we would work with the Republicans wherever we could; that we
    wanted a Government that was smaller but still strong enough to do the
    job, and it focused on giving people the tools they need to make the
    most of their own lives. And I'm proud of the fact that we focused on a
    lot of big questions for ordinary people, like, how do you balance work
    and family; how can you get education for a lifetime; how can we open
    the doors of college to everybody who's willing to work for it?
        And in addition to all of those statistics I gave you, we literally
    have just about opened the doors of college for everybody willing to
    work for it: a $1,500 tax credit for the first 2 years of college; tax
    credits for the junior and senior year and for graduate school and for
    lifetime learning; and more Pell grant scholarships and work-study
    programs and the AmeriCorps national service program. I'm proud of that
    stuff. I'm proud of the Family and Medical Leave Act and AmeriCorps and
    the fact that we're extending health insurance to 5 million little
    children who wouldn't have it otherwise. But it all has to work
    together.
        And here's the point I want to make tonight. I didn't come here to
    make this comment and say, therefore, you should only vote for Democrats
    for the rest of your life because we've had 5\1/2\ good years. I never
    will forget when I was contemplating running for a fifth term as
    Governor of Arkansas, and I'd already been Governor almost 10 years, and
    we had Governor's Day at the State Fair. And I went out to my little
    booth, and I'd sit there and visit with people all day long. This old
    boy in overalls came up to me, and no one had ever run for a fifth term
    to serve 14 years before, and I'd already been in 10 years, even though
    I was reasonably young. So this guy came up to me in overalls and he
    said, ``Bill, are you going to run for Governor again?'' And I said,
    ``Well, if I do, will you vote for me?'' He said, ``Yeah, I will. I
    always have. I guess I will.'' I said, ``Aren't you sick of me by now?''
    He said, ``No, but nearly everyone else I know is.'' [Laughter] And I
    said, ``Well, don't they think I've done a good job?'' He said, ``They
    think you've done a wonderful job, but that's what they hired you to do.
    You get a paycheck every 2 weeks like everybody else''--interesting
    thing--``that's what we hired you to do.''
        I say that to make this point. When a country has things going along
    pretty well, there are two conceivable responses: You can become smug
    and complacent and think you're doing everything right, and sort of lay
    back and relax and enjoy it; or if you're smart, particularly in a time
    like this, you realize that in spite of all the good things that have
    happened in America we still have challenges that are unmet here, and
    the waters are roiling, the changes are still going on in the globe. And
    the only way to keep the good times going is to keep ahead of change,
    and to keep pushing for change, and to take advantage of the fact that
    so much has been done and that frees us up to look at the long-term
    challenges.
        Now, if I could just give you an example, I mean, 8 or 9 years ago,
    people looked at Japan and thought that they would never have another
    problem as long as any of them lived. They have a lot of problems. I say
    that not to be critical but to say that any great society has to
    continue to be willing at every turn, at every challenge, to make the
    difficult decisions necessary to keep moving forward.
        And if you look at the level of uncertainty in the world, whether
    it's economic uncertainty

    [[Page 973]]

    or political uncertainty, even though things are going great for us,
    that alone ought to be a big argument for the American people in this
    election year saying, ``Okay, we're glad things are going well, but we
    want to know what we're going to do in the future. We want to take
    advantage of the financial stability we have and the emotional
    confidence we've been given to look at the long run.''
        And if I just might mention three or four other things that I
    believe our Democratic Party needs to be continuing to push. Now, I
    intend to continue to push until we either get it done or I leave office
    in January of 2001. One is we must not spend this surplus that we are
    finally going to accumulate after 30 years until we have first taken
    care of the responsibility we have to reform Medicare and Social
    Security, to take account of the retirement of the baby boomers. We have
    a moral obligation to people--and I'm the oldest of the baby boomers--we
    have a moral obligation not to bankrupt our children and undermine their
    ability to raise our grandchildren. And so I know that everybody wants
    to--you know, we'd all like to have a tax cut or maybe some spending
    program or something. First and foremost, if you look at the long-term
    financial trends, we must act now when, with more modest changes, we can
    strengthen this country for 50 years and have us coming together instead
    of being driven apart.
        Second, we must do something to give all of our children access to
    world-class education from kindergarten through 12th grade. We've got
    the best system of higher education in the world. I was reading today,
    just an article about a Chinese entrepreneur in China--you know, a lot
    of the media are running stories about China now because I'm about to go
    there--and about how this fellow in China who was making a killing with
    an Internet company had gotten a Ph.D. at Texas Tech and how he hated to
    give up his cowboy boots and cowboy hat to go home to China, but his new
    riches were compensating for it.
        Everybody knows we've got the best system of higher education in the
    world. No serious person believes that America will reach its full
    potential unless and until we give world-class education and can prove
    we can do it in K through 12. I can tell you that I have seen enough of
    the changes that have happened in the city of Chicago, which may have
    had the worst big city school system in the country a few years ago, to
    know that we can all do that. And time doesn't permit me to go into it,
    but that's a big challenge. That's something I think about all the time.
        The third thing we have to do is prove we can grow the economy and
    preserve the environment. And I will just give you, if I might, a couple
    of examples. We had the first ever oceans conference last week in
    California at Monterey, on the beautiful Monterey Peninsula. There is a
    dead space in the Gulf of Mexico the size of the State of New Jersey.
    Why? Because of runoff into the Mississippi River, which in turn runs
    into the Gulf of Mexico. Is it inevitable? Would we have to give up
    economic growth to stop that? No, we wouldn't. If you go to Lake Tahoe,
    for example, which has other environmental problems, they don't have any
    runoff when they build a golf course there or a housing development,
    because they have agreed, among themselves, to high standards which will
    not permit that kind of pollution of that lake.
        I'll give you another example, even more profound but related to the
    quality of the ocean. And let me say, if we upset a huge amount of the
    very fabric of life on Earth comes out of the ocean and sustains us--71
    percent of the Earth's surface is ocean. The depths are--to the bottom
    of the deepest part of the ocean is about 7 miles down, and we know less
    about that by far than we know about the Moon. We now know less about it
    than we know about Mars. We need to go there. We need to know what's
    there. We need to preserve this. This is about how we live. It has
    nothing to do with hurting the economy.
        The other thing I want to say is that I am absolutely convinced that
    the climate of this Earth is warming and that it is warming at an
    unsustainable rate and that we will pay a terrific price unless we find
    a way to grow the economy and reduce global warming by reducing
    greenhouse gases. The good news is we can do it. All we have to do is
    make up our mind to do it.
        When I was in Monterey, two young Stanford graduate students--fine-
    looking young people, bright, full of life and energy--took me out into
    the bay there. When the tide went out, we were walking out on the rocks
    and looking at the sea otters and the harbor seals. And they started
    picking up little snails. And they said,

    [[Page 974]]

    ``You want some evidence of climate change and global warming? See these
    little snails here in Monterey? Fifty years ago, these snails were not
    found north of Los Angeles. But all the wildlife is moving north now.''
        I can tell you, one of my big problems with our best partner in the
    world, Canada, is that what our salmon fishermen are fighting all the
    time. You know why? Because all the salmon are moving north. So there
    are more in Alaska and fewer in Canada because of climate change.
        Now, we have proved--every environmental challenge we've had for the
    last 30 years, we have proved we could lower pollution and increase
    growth. I have not proposed anything to deal with these challenges that
    will bankrupt the American economy, and I have proposed to deal with it
    in a free market, technology-oriented way. But I'm telling--to deny the
    fact that we are dramatically changing the environment in which our
    children and grandchildren will live is shear folly.
        There's now a phenomenon which many people in international cities
    with international airports will tell you, called ``airport malaria.''
    And it's being spread primarily because mosquitoes carrying malaria are
    being found at higher and higher and higher and previously cooler
    climates, infecting people who've never had it before, who don't know
    they have it, get on airplanes, fly into Orly Airport, bump into you;
    you get back to New York, and you found out you got malaria. All of this
    is a function of both the increasing globalization of the economy and
    society and the warming of the climate.
        Now, it may not make today's headlines, but when we've got the
    lowest unemployment rate in 28 years, I think you want your President
    and your Congress and your country thinking about what kind of problems
    are going to have to be solved if we're going to be the greatest country
    in the world 50 years from now.
        Let me just give you another one, one that I mentioned about Herb.
    We have to do something about our inner cities, about our Native
    American reservations, and our rural areas, which have not felt this
    economic recovery, whether it's restructuring our tax system to finding
    other ways to get incentives in there, whatever it takes. If we're not
    going to do it now, when will we ever do it? If we can't do something
    about urban America, if we can't do something for people who are, in
    effect, in economic enclaves of disempowerment on Native American
    reservations and in rural areas, when are we ever going to do it?
        The unemployment rate is under 5 percent. You think we could even
    think about this if the unemployment rate were 9 percent? If I were up
    here giving this speech, my successor, whoever it is, the unemployment
    rate goes up to 9 percent, you would think I had flipped a gasket. You'd
    want to know how we could get the whole show on the road.
        But think about how we can continue to grow the American economy,
    lower the unemployment rate, and not have inflation, invest where there
    is underinvestment. It's good economics now; it won't be forever. That's
    why what Herb and a lot of you are trying to
    do in Washington, DC, is so important and why we need it going on
    everywhere and why the United States should have a framework to support
    it.
        One other issue--I could give you a thousand, but really, I think
    there are only about eight big issues, but I only want to mention one
    other. I spoke at Portland State University, Saturday, about immigration
    and about the new challenge of race as we move into the 21st century.
    And I want you to think about what's happening in America as against
    what's happening in the rest of the world.
        I introduced a family at Portland State, a Mexican-American
    immigrant who came here 12 years ago--a woman who came here 12 years
    ago, didn't speak a word of English, didn't graduate from high school in
    Mexico--got her master's degree in education last Saturday at Portland
    State, a community college organized--originally, it's a university
    now--it was originally organized to serve soldiers under the GI bill
    after World War II.
        So she came here 12 years ago, didn't speak a word of English, got
    her master's degree. Her son got his bachelor's degree in business; he
    worked full-time for 7 years and went to school on the side to get his
    degree. And her second son is getting his master's degree in education
    next year. That's the best of the immigrant story.
        Now, in a global economy and a global society, it seems to me that
    our increasing diversity is a huge asset as long as everybody is pulling
    their own load and everybody has a fair chance to pull their own load,
    and we don't feel like we're losing America. And I've really spent a lot
    of time trying to challenge the American people to think about this and
    get over our notion that America is about race. America is

    [[Page 975]]

    not about race; it's about our common embrace of humanity. It's not even
    about a place; it's about a promise.
        And if you look at the whole rest of the world today, all the places
    that are really just all torn up and upset, or having trouble because
    now that the cold war is over and we don't get to divide up into
    communist and noncommunist camps, like one team has on red uniforms, the
    other one's got on green--in too many places, we're reverting to lowest-
    common-denominator divisions: race, religion, ethnicity. Whether it's
    Northern Ireland, the Middle East, Bosnia, Kosovo, Rwanda, India and
    Pakistan, you name it, you find me a real hot place in the world, and
    I'll show you some people that are defining themselves by being able to
    look down on somebody else because they're of a different race or
    religion or ethnic group.
        And so I say--that's the last thing--I think America should take
    this opportunity. We will never have any more self-confidence than we do
    right now. And now is the time for us to think about what it's going to
    be like when we are a truly multiracial, multiethnic democracy 50 years
    from now, when there is no majority race in the United States of
    America. Will it still be our America? You bet it will, if we do the
    right things.
        So I say to you, I think you've done a good thing by coming here
    tonight, because you're financing what I hope will be a permanent engine
    of progressive ideas to move America into the future, moving beyond
    partisan politics and power politics for the sake of it, toward a
    rigorous, passionate focus on what's really best for our children.
    That's what I've tried to do, and that's what I think our party
    represents.
        Thank you, and God bless you.

    Note: The President spoke at 8:15 p.m. at a private residence. In his
    remarks, he referred to dinner hosts Herbert and Patrice Miller; Gov.
    Roy Romer of Colorado, general chair, Leonard Barrack, national finance
    chair, Donald L. Fowler, former national chair, and Carol Pensky,
    treasurer, Democratic National Committee; graduate students Nancy
    Eufemia and Raphael Sagarin, researchers at Hopkins Marine Station; and
    Portland State University graduate students Mago Gilson and her sons
    Eddy and Oscar.