    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1997, Book II)]
    [November 14, 1997]
    [Pages 1567-1572]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the Women's Leadership Forum in Las Vegas, Nevada
    November 14, 1997

        Thank you very much. Thank you all for being here, for being in such
    a good humor. [Laughter] You know why they're sitting down now? Because
    they think I'm going to talk a lot longer than previous speakers.
    [Laughter]
        I want to thank Senator Reid and Senator Bryan and Governor Miller
    for being here, for their service, and for their remarkable friendship
    to me. I'd like to thank the national chair of the Women's Leadership
    Forum, Cynthia Friedman, who is also up here on the stage with

    [[Page 1568]]

    us. And we have other people here from the national Democratic Party--I
    see Carol Pensky out there--I thank all of them. But I want to say a
    special word of thanks to Shelly Berkeley and to Cassandra Williams, and
    to you, Mayor Jones, all of you who made this night possible.
        This is an event sponsored by the Women's Leadership Forum, but I
    see there are a few lucky men out here in the audience--[laughter]--and
    I thank you for showing up, too. I'd be lonely if you weren't here.
        I got tickled when the mayor was telling that story about my mother,
    which is a true story. That's not one of those things you make up
    because it sounds good on the podium. My mother spent the last weekend
    of her life in Las Vegas. [Laughter] And she had been quite ill for a
    long time. And the night she passed away she called me, and we had a
    long and perfectly normal conversation. And I thought to myself that in
    her own mind she got to go to heaven 4 days early. She looked at it that
    way. [Laughter] So whenever I land at the airport here, I always imagine
    that my mother is landing with me because she loved to come here so much
    and had so many friends here.
        Let me say very briefly to all of you, this is a very exciting,
    interesting, and good time for America. Congress just went home. We had
    a very good year. We passed an historic balanced budget agreement. It
    had the largest investment for children's health that your National
    Government has made since 1965. It has a huge effort to improve research
    and care in the area of diabetes, an illness that affects 16 million
    Americans. The diabetes foundation said it's the most important thing
    done in diabetes since the discovery of insulin 70 years ago.
        It has a major, major investment, the largest investment in
    education since 1965, everything from more Pell grants to more work-
    study positions to more funds to put computers in every classroom in
    this country by the year 2000. It, for the first time, puts us on record
    as favoring national academic standards and a voluntary testing system
    to see how all our children are doing. This was a great budget, and it
    is going to make a huge difference in America. Yesterday I signed the
    last big piece of it, dealing with the health care and the education
    initiatives.
        The Senate ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention that will make
    all of you young people here and your children less likely to be exposed
    to deadly chemicals from terrorists and organized criminals, a terribly
    important thing.
        The Congress passed landmark reform of the Food and Drug
    Administration which will enable us to continue to test medicines to
    make sure they're safe for the American people but will move them to the
    market a lot quicker, so that people who have serious illnesses in
    America and want to know they're going to get access to the medicine
    that's the best in the world as quickly as possible will know that we're
    doing the best job in the world of both protecting their safety and
    getting them medicines that can save their lives. This is a huge issue.
        The Senate and the House passed a landmark reform of our adoption
    system in America to give massive new incentives and speed up the system
    by which families can adopt children, which is a terribly important
    issue. Just last year we passed a $5,000 adoption tax credit, and in a
    few days, when Hillary comes home from her trip--she worked hard on
    this--we're going to have a nice little signing ceremony and describe to
    the world what this adoption initiative does. But it is very important,
    and I'm proud of it, and every woman in America should be proud of it.
        So this was a good year, a historic year. And it was another step
    along the way in trying to implement the vision that I ran for President
    6 years ago to try to implement, one that, thank goodness, has received
    the support of a substantial majority of America's women and has helped
    us to build a party for the future.
        But it's pretty simple. I know that we are moving into a very
    different time. We are dramatically changing the basis of economic
    activity. We are seeing dramatic changes in the way people live as well
    as the way they work and the way we relate to each other. Our own
    country is changing dramatically; we're getting more and more diverse in
    every conceivable way but especially in racial and ethnic and religious
    terms. The way we relate to the world is different. We are the world's
    strongest military power and have the world's strongest economy, but we
    are still only 4 percent of the world's population, with about 20
    percent of its income, so that increasingly our ability to succeed in
    ensuring our own future depends on our willingness to get involved in
    issues beyond our border and our willingness to recognize that we are
    interdependent with others and that we have to work in partnership with
    others.

    [[Page 1569]]

        What are the big security problems of the future? Terrorism, weapons
    of mass destruction proliferation, organized crime, international drug
    dealing, international environmental crises, the spread of new diseases
    across national borders--none of these can be dealt with unless we're
    willing to work as partners. We can lead, but we have to lead in a world
    increasingly interdependent.
        In Bosnia, we are there with soldiers from more than two dozen other
    countries, including Russian soldiers, working side by side. That is a
    metaphor for what we'll have to do in the future.
        And what I want to do is to have an America in which every person,
    without regard to his or her circumstances in life, has a chance to live
    out his or her dreams if they're responsible enough to work for it and
    to be a good citizen; a country in which we're coming together, instead
    of being driven apart as so many other societies are; and a nation still
    strong enough to lead the world for peace and freedom and prosperity.
    We've been working at it for 6 years now.
        The economy is stronger; we have the lowest unemployment rate in 24
    years; we have the lowest inflation rate in 30 years. We had another big
    drop in the crime rate last year. The murder rate in America has dropped
    22 percent in just 3 years, 10 percent last year alone. We've had the
    biggest drop in welfare rolls in the country's history. And even though
    we've had two decades of immigration, lots and lots of poor people
    coming to our shores to work and find their way, we have the smallest
    percentage of our population on welfare in almost 30 years. This country
    is working again. We're coming together; we're moving into the future
    again.
        And I guess what I want to say to all of you, since you invested in
    this to come here, is you've got to do a better job of telling people
    that this did not happen by accident. When I started running for
    President, with my rather earthy friend James Carville from Louisiana
    helping me--[laughter]--a brilliant young man by the name of--James is
    from Louisiana; Paul Begala, his partner, was from Texas; and I was from
    Arkansas. And a brilliant young man by the name of Gene Sperling who is
    now my national economic counselor, from Michigan, came to work for us.
    And he called his mother after working for us for about a week, and he
    said, ``Mom, if I'm going to survive down here with all these guys from
    the South, I'm going to have to learn a lot more animal stories''--
    [laughter]--because we would all say things like our opponents were
    squealing like a pig under a gate--[laughter]--or you never know how far
    a frog will jump till you punch it. [Laughter] But one of the things I
    was taught as a child is that if you see a turtle on a fencepost, the
    chances are it didn't get there by accident. [Laughter]
        And so, all these things that are going on in America didn't just
    happen. We had a different political philosophy--not different values
    for the Democratic Party, the same values--but we believed we needed a
    new politics for a new era.
        And I must say, I've been deeply grateful for the support of both
    your Senators and your Governor in every critical step along the way,
    because it was basically what people were doing as mayors and Governors
    and State legislators throughout America anyway.
        But I thought, on the economy, we had to bring down the deficit and
    invest more in education and our future. I thought we had to trade more
    around the world. I don't believe it's right to say we can walk away
    from the obligation to sell more American products around the world.
    This is not rocket science. If you're 4 percent of the world's
    population and you have 20 percent of the income and you'd like to keep
    it, you've got to sell something to the other 96 percent. If your
    markets are open and other people's markets are closed, in order to make
    a trade agreement with them, you have to lower your trade barriers a
    little bit so they'll lower theirs a lot. That's probably a pretty good
    deal.
        On the other hand, we can't afford to say that's all we're
    interested in because the economy is churning so much today, most people
    who are dislocated from work lose their jobs because of technological
    changes that will occur in every country whether there's more trade or
    not. But because we're Democrats, we have an obligation to worry about
    those people, to give people a better, quicker, more comprehensive
    system if they are dislocated from their jobs for whatever reason to
    move back into the work force more quickly, and to contribute with us to
    our future.
        I believe on welfare we should require people to go to work, but we
    ought to recognize that their most important work, like everybody
    else's, is raising their children. So when they said in

    [[Page 1570]]

    the other party, ``Oh, by the way, we want to require people to go to
    work and take away from the children the fundamental right of nutrition
    and the fundamental right of health care, and by the way, we don't want
    to come up with any more money for child care,'' I vetoed the bill
    twice, because I thought it was wrong. Now, but once we got it right, I
    changed. I signed the bill because it was consistent with what we've
    been working on for 3 years. But a lot of people don't get it. I still
    read in the paper, some journalist will say, ``The President signed the
    Republicans' welfare bill.'' Bull! [Laughter] What planet were they--
    it's like in Washington, it's amazing, if an issue has a certain label
    on it, a lot of people in old-think say, ``Well, that label belongs to
    one party.'' The Democrats weren't supposed to be interested in crime
    and welfare and growing the economy. Don't be involved in people's
    lives. How many elections will you win?
        In crime, I read the other day that someone said, ``Well, some
    people in the House of Representatives were mad at the President for
    adopting a Republican position on crime.'' I said, hello--[laughter]--
    what planet was this person on? In 1994 the Democrats, over the
    bitterest, fiercest opposition of the Republican leaders and a bitter
    attempt in a last-ditch filibuster in the United States Senate by my
    distinguished opponent in the last election, passed a crime bill that
    they were against and we were for. It put 100,000 police on the street
    and took assault weapons off the street. And I think it was right.
        We were for the Brady bill; their leadership was against it. And it
    played a role--65,000 police officers in 3 years have been approved
    under the crime bill to be put out on the streets. And if you go to any
    community in the country where the crime rate is coming down, they'll
    tell you the central reason is there has been a change in the philosophy
    of policing in this country, to get kids and keep them out of trouble in
    the first place, to walk the blocks and to build ties to neighbors, and
    to catch people when they do commit crimes more quickly. And that, plus
    the generally improving circumstances in America, is plummeting the
    crime rate in this country. And that is a good thing. But it did not
    happen by accident.
        I say that because we need people to understand that we still have
    big challenges out there. And we need the support, and we need to build
    an infrastructure of Americans who understand that the politics of this
    country have changed.
        In the environment, 1995, one of the most troubling things about the
    new Republican majority in Congress was their contract on America said
    the only way we could have a good America is to grow the economy and
    forget about the environment: ``We're going to break down all these
    terrible regulations for clean air and clean water, and it's just
    choking business.'' And I said, ``Well, if we Democrats were trying to
    choke business by cleaning the air, cleaning the water, and cleaning up
    the toxic waste, we've done a sorry job because we've had more new
    businesses start in every year since I've been President than in any
    year in American history.'' So we're not very good at killing business
    with environmental regulation. We're not very good at that.
        We believe you have to protect the environment and grow the economy.
    Shelly had that little passing line about the nuclear waste disposal--I
    thought you'd never mention it. [Laughter] I hope that everyone in
    Nevada remembers that there's been pretty much of a partisan divide on
    that, too, although some of our Democrats have strayed over to the other
    side. But that's just because it's a big problem in their States, and
    they want to dump it somewhere, and they've never been here. [Laughter]
        My position has never been to come here and pander to you; it's just
    to tell the truth. This is a serious issue, and we should not make a
    decision to do this anywhere until we're sure that it is safe and we're
    absolutely certain that our predecessors didn't pick a site for
    political reasons, because you don't have many electoral votes. That's
    all I've ever said.
        And I can honestly say that neither of your Senators nor your
    Governor ever asked me to promise that under no circumstances ever would
    I say that I didn't care what the evidence was, I would never think
    about this. All they said was, ``Make sure that we're doing the right
    thing by our children and make sure that we haven't been singled out
    because we're a big State with still a fairly small population and not
    many electoral votes.'' That's all they asked. And that was the right
    thing to do. I thought it was right then; I think it's right now. And I
    appreciated it.
        Again let me say, the reason this is important is not so Shelly can
    win an election--I'm not

    [[Page 1571]]

    running anymore, so I can say all this--[laughter]--this is not just
    about an election for Congress; it's about how you're going to live.
        We still have a lot of other issues. Let me just give you some
    issues that I think would be quite important to you. We still have to
    pass through Congress legislation which implements our initiative to
    reduce teenage smoking in America and saves lives. It's going to be a
    huge thing, and we have to do it in a way that improves the public
    health and protects our children. That's a big issue for next year.
        Next year--a couple years ago we passed a bill that stopped
    insurance companies from kicking women out of the hospital in 48 hours
    after they had had a baby, whether they were ready to leave or not. And
    we now find that a lot of the same things are happening with
    mastectomies, when the women are leaving, and I think we ought to have
    the same standard for that. I think that's an important thing.
        But in a larger sense, we believe strongly that there ought to be a
    patients' bill of rights for quality health care that doctors and
    patients have worked on. And if we're going to have more managed care
    and we're going to have more HMO's, people have the right to know that--
    that's a good thing if somebody is taking your health care money and
    making it go as far as possible so we don't have inflation, as long as
    you're not giving up quality.
        Now, right before this Congress broke up, there was huge news back
    East about how the leaders of the other party had called the health
    insurance companies and others and told them to get up off their
    backsides and go to work to kill our attempts to protect the quality of
    health care for patients in this country. That's a big issue. That is a
    choice.
        I believe we can moderate health care costs and guarantee quality. I
    believe it is part of the Nation's responsibility to do that. If you
    believe that, in 1997 terms that makes you a Democrat, because that's
    our party's position. And that is not their position.
        You have got to help us go out and clarify these choices for people.
    We passed that economic program in 1993. They told me, the people in the
    other party said I was going to bankrupt the country; we'd increase the
    deficit; and the economy would go into the tank. Well, that's what they
    said. They actually won a congressional race partly on that, that and
    telling everybody we were going to take their guns away and all the
    stuff they said in '94.
        Well, sooner or later, people should be held accountable. Are our
    ideas right? Were they implemented? Have they made a difference? Were
    their ideas right? Were they implemented? Have they made a difference?
    I've done everything I could to work in a responsible, bipartisan way,
    but where there are still clear differences, I think the evidence is, we
    were right.
        Today I took action again to try to deal with this assault weapons
    problem because, now that we've banned them in America, you've got all
    these foreign gun manufacturers who are trying to modify their assault
    weapons to get them in under the sport weapon definition. So I said, for
    120 days we're not going to take any more of these weapons until we
    study it. I am not going to let people overseas turn our streets into
    battle zones where gangs are armed like they were guerrilla warriors
    halfway around the world if I can stop it. But you've got to decide.
        So I thank you for being here. I thank you for your contributions.
    But let's go out and have a little debate here--1998 is an election
    year--and ask people to think about whether they really believe what has
    happened in America has happened by accident. Ask them to think about
    what they believe the Nation should do.
        The Democrats of 1997 are not out there defending big Government and
    big regulations and all this. We've reduced the size of Government by
    300,000--more than any previous Republican administration in modern
    times. We have reduced more Government regulations. We have given more
    authority to State and local government. We have privatized more
    operations than previous Republican administrations.
        But we have not given up the fundamental responsibility to define
    the national interest when it comes to protecting families and children
    and communities and futures. That's what we haven't done, and that's why
    this country is moving forward and moving forward together.
        I want you to be a part of it. I thank you for being here tonight. I
    hope you'll help us in all these elections. But talk to people about
    what is going to affect our children's lives. We're making a difference,
    and you can make a bigger one.
        Thank you, and God bless you.

    Note: The President spoke at 7:50 p.m. in the New Country Club Building
    at the Sheraton

    [[Page 1572]]

    Desert Inn. In his remarks, he referred to Gov. Bob Miller of Nevada;
    Carol Pensky, treasurer, Democratic National Committee; Shelly Berkeley,
    candidate for Nevada's First Congressional District, who introduced the
    President; Cassandra Williams, reception chair, Women's Leadership
    Forum; and Mayor Jan Laverty Jones of Las Vegas.