    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1997, Book II)]
    [December 15, 1997]
    [Pages 1767-1770]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks Announcing the Appointment of Bill Lann Lee as Acting Assistant
    Attorney General for Civil Rights and an Exchange With Reporters
    December 15, 1997

        The President. I want to thank the Attorney General for her support.
    And again, I want to join the Vice President and the Attorney General in
    thanking Isabelle Katz Pinzler for the great job she has done as Acting
    Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. I wish her well as she
    returns to private life, to her husband, her son, and daughter in New
    York City.
        Today it is with a great deal of pride that I name Bill Lann Lee to
    the post of Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and
    Counselor to the Attorney General for Civil Rights Enforcement. From
    this day forward, he will be America's top civil rights enforcer,
    serving at the helm of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights
    Division.

    [[Page 1768]]

        It is fitting that this announcement comes on the 206th anniversary
    of the Bill of Rights, our charter of freedom and equality. Our present
    civil rights laws have helped all of us move closer to those timeless
    values. They protect every person from discrimination, especially
    discrimination against women, minorities, Americans with disabilities,
    and victims of hate crimes. They ensure that all Americans have equal
    opportunities to work, to learn, to live, to raise their children in
    communities where they can thrive and grow.
        I can think of no one whose life story and impeccable credentials
    make him more suited to enforcing these laws than Bill Lann Lee. Because
    of his long struggle in this nominating process, his life story has
    become rather well known to millions of Americans. They know now that he
    has lived the American dream and that he embodies American values.
        The son of poor Chinese immigrants who, like millions of other
    Americans, came to this country seeking better futures, and despite
    feeling the sting and frustration of discrimination throughout their
    lives, they were people who never lost faith in America. They settled in
    Harlem, built a small business washing clothes, taught their two sons
    the value of hard work and the limitless possibilities of a good
    education. Bill Lee won a scholarship to Yale and went on to earn a law
    degree from Columbia. His brother became a Baptist minister. I leave it
    to you to decide which one got the better end of the deal. [Laughter]
        Above all, the Lees instilled in their sons a deep and abiding love
    for country and our values. It is this love for America, the faith in
    the American ideal, that inspired Mr. Lee to pursue a career in civil
    rights law. Over a lifetime he has worked tirelessly to end the
    discrimination that keeps us from reaching our greatest potential as a
    people.
        As a lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the organization
    founded by the great Thurgood Marshall, Mr. Lee has sought to bring
    people together, to reconcile opposing views, to forge consensus, and to
    find the common ground we all must stand on. His commitment to fairness
    and the dignity of all Americans won the respect and admiration of
    clients and opposing lawyers alike.
        We need more Americans like Bill Lee in the highest offices of
    Government. In the last session of Congress, he was denied the vote he
    deserves on his confirmation because some Senators disagree with his
    views on affirmative action. But his views on affirmative action are my
    views on affirmative action: No quotas, no discrimination, no position
    or benefit for any unqualified person; but mend, don't end affirmative
    action, so that all Americans can have a fair chance at living the
    American dream.
        My constitutional right and responsibility as President is to put in
    office men and women who will further our policies consistent with our
    obligations under the Constitution. Some people want to wait for me to
    appoint someone to this position whom I disagree with. But America
    cannot afford to wait that long. And it would be a long wait indeed.
    [Laughter] The enforcement of our civil rights laws demands strong
    leadership now.
        In the coming months, I will resubmit Mr. Lee's nomination to the
    Senate. I will be pressing very hard for a straight up or down vote, and
    I am confident that once the Senate and the American people are given a
    fair chance to judge Mr. Lee's performance, he will be confirmed.
        While he will have the full authority and support to carry out the
    duties of the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, I still look
    forward to striking the word ``acting'' from his title. He is a
    remarkable American, and I am confident that he will enforce our civil
    rights laws with the same professionalism, honesty, and integrity he has
    exhibited throughout his life and career. He is truly the best person
    for this job.
        Mr. Lee.

    [At this point, Mr. Lee made brief remarks.]

        Q. Mr. President, why did you pick acting instead of recess?
        Q. [Inaudible]--Senator Specter has appealed to you----
        Q. Why did you choose to----
        The President. I have two objectives. One is to get Mr. Lee into the
    leadership of the Civil Rights Division as soon as possible. The other
    is to maximize the chances that he can be confirmed in the coming year
    in the Senate. I believe this path is the best way to maximize the
    chance of achieving both objectives.
        Q. Mr. President, do you think that you minimized the problem of
    retaliation that the Republicans threatened by choosing this path?

    [[Page 1769]]

        The President. Well, I don't know about that. I think that
    retaliation is not only inappropriate and unwarranted, it would be
    wrong. As far as the pace of confirmation of judges, I don't think it's
    been adequate to date anyway. The Senate has a constitutional
    responsibility to consider these judges in a timely fashion, and I want
    them to do much better, not worse.
        But you know, no President can proceed in office and do the duty
    that the Constitution imposes if you spend your time worrying about
    retaliation. I think this is an honorable decision which gives the
    Senate a chance to consider Mr. Lee again, something which I believe
    would not have happened if I had done it in another way. That's what I
    want to do. And I want to work with the Senate in a positive way, but I
    can't be worried about retaliation. I have to do what I think is right.
        Q. The Senate also appealed to you on constitutional grounds as
    well, saying that you shouldn't do this under Articles I or II. How do
    you respond to that? And if Mr. Lee wants to step up, why did you want
    to step into such a political firestorm that was caused by your
    nomination?
        The President. Well, first of all, I have been very judicious in the
    use of recess appointments. If you look at my record as compared with
    every President--I've gone back all the way to President Ford, and he
    was just here a little less than 2\1/2\ years. But I have been very
    disciplined in the use of these appointments. President Reagan and
    President Bush made far more recess appointments than I have.
        I have done my best to work with the United States Senate in an
    entirely constitutional way. But we had to get somebody into the Civil
    Rights Division. And I'm not sure anybody could have been confirmed if
    the test is that I have to appoint someone who disagrees with me on
    affirmative action, which seemed to be what some of the Senators are
    saying. And I just couldn't imagine getting anybody more qualified than
    Bill Lee. So I decided we needed to go on and do what I thought was
    right for the country.
        Q. But, sir, why should this not be seen as an act of defiance
    against the advise and consent process in the Senate?
        The President. Well, first of all, the Senate did not decline--they
    did not reject his appointment. The Senate never even got a chance to
    vote on his appointment. And if the Senate had rejected his appointment,
    I would not--even though I would have bitterly disagreed with it, I
    certainly would not have named him to this position. I believe that the
    Senate, if given a chance to vote on him, will embrace his appointment.
    And I believe after he's been there a few months, he'll have even more
    votes. So that's what I hope will happen and what I believe we have a
    chance to have happen now.
        Q. Isn't it like having one hand tied behind his back to start this
    job politically as an acting----
        The President. No. Absolutely not. He has the full authority of the
    office. And you have seen here, he has the full confidence of the
    Attorney General and the President. That's all he needs.
        Q. But, Mr. President, you still have those that are opposing him.
    And what if the same thing were to happen that happened this year?
    What's the next step?
        The President. He'll be the Acting Attorney General for Civil
    Rights, and he'll be enforcing the civil rights laws.
        Q. Why do you think politics were at play in this issue, sir? You
    and your top aides are saying that politics were responsible for the
    opposition. Why could it not--why do you not accept it as just an honest
    disagreement on issues?
        The President. Because I was elected President, and I didn't make
    any secret of my position on affirmative action. I might say also, this
    administration has done a lot to change the affirmative action laws to
    eliminate some of the abuses that I thought existed. But we can never be
    in a position of saying that a President shouldn't have someone in
    office who agrees with him. Now, that doesn't mean every--if a President
    makes an appointment that's way outside the mainstream of established
    legal thought or somebody who has a lack of experience or someone who
    has otherwise demonstrated an unfitness for office, then the Senate may
    reject that person, who parenthetically may be agreeing with the
    President.
        But none of those elements were here--none, not a single one. And
    that's why I thought this was the right thing to do, and I still feel
    that way. I feel more strongly than I did the day I nominated him.
        Q. What is the name of your dog? [Laughter]
        Q. When will you submit the nomination again?

    [[Page 1770]]

        The President. What did you say?
        Q. When will you submit the nomination again?
        The President. Oh, I don't know. Early next year, in a timely
    fashion.
        Q. Your appointment to Mexico as a Mexican Ambassador was also
    blocked. Did you decide with this that enough is enough and that you
    were going to take a stand on this? Why was there a difference in the
    decision to put Lee in there without confirming him?
        The President. Because I think under these circumstances we actually
    have a chance to get him confirmed. The Ambassador position to Mexico
    was entirely different. And normally you don't appoint a recess--you
    don't make a recess appointment, for example, of an Ambassador unless
    there is some understanding that that person will actually be confirmed
    when the time comes for the confirmation. The facts were different.
        Q. Is there any difference between the way an Acting Assistant
    Attorney General does his job and a fully nominated and confirmed
    Assistant Attorney General can do his job? Is there any difference
    between the two?
        The President. I do not believe there is any difference at all as
    long as the Acting Attorney General--the Acting Assistant Attorney
    General has the confidence and support of the Attorney General and the
    confidence and support of the President. And that is the message today.
    I think he's in great shape, and I can't wait for him to go to work.

    President's New Dog

        Q. What's the answer to the big question in this country? What's the
    name of your dog? [Laughter]
        The President. First of all, let me thank--I want to thank
    everybody, all these kids that came in all over the country. I've never
    gotten so many suggestions in my life. And some of them were quite
    hilarious, Advise and Consent. A child yesterday said I should name the
    dog Top Secret, so I could run around the White House saying, ``Top
    Secret, Top Secret.'' [Laughter]
        Q. What do you call him now?
        The President. Anyway, I got all these names, and we had a little
    family conference last night. We got down to two names, and we selected
    one. And I think I'll announce it tomorrow at the press conference.
    [Laughter]
        Thank you.

    Note: The President spoke at 12:45 p.m. in the Oval Office at the White
    House. In his remarks, he referred to former Gov. William F. Weld of
    Massachusetts, whose nomination to be Ambassador to Mexico was withdrawn
    on September 18.