[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1997, Book I)]
[June 23, 1997]
[Pages 794-803]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks to the United States Conference of Mayors in San Francisco, 
California
June 23, 1997

    Thank you. Well, we were outside, and they played ``Ruffles and 
Flourishes,'' and we had a momentary delay when we tried to decide 
whether Mayor Brown or I should walk in first. [Laughter] We finally got 
it right, if you saw how--[laughter].
    I am delighted to be here. I thank Mayor Daley for his warm 
introduction, fulfilling one of Clinton's laws of politics: Always be 
introduced by someone whose brother is in the Cabinet. [Laughter] I'm 
glad to be here with Secretary Cuomo, Secretary Herman. Senator Boxer, 
thank you for joining us this morning. Representative Lofgren I think is 
here. Mayor Brown, thanks for putting on such a good show. Thanks for 
giving me another reason to come to San Francisco. To all the mayors 
here on the stage and in the audience, especially to Mayor Helmke and 
Mayor Corradini, who are about to assume their respective offices.
    I saw my good friend Mayor Rice, and he said that today is his 
wife's birthday, so happy birthday. There you are. Happy birthday. 
[Applause] Thank you. I know that Mayor and Mrs. Webb are here. They 
hosted us at the Summit of the Eight, and if they fall asleep during the 
speech, I give them advance permission because they've been up for 2 or 
3 days. [Laughter] Denver did a great job.
    Thank you, Tom Cochran, for the work you've done with us. I'd also 
like to just make a special note of my new Director of Intergovernmental 
Affairs at the White House, who has been here with you, Mickey Ibarra, 
and Lynn Cutler, who has also been here. We're glad to have them working 
with you, and I know you'll enjoy working with them.
    And I'd like to announce my intention to fill Secretary Cuomo's 
former job as Assistant Secretary of HUD for Community Planning with the 
mayor of Laredo, Texas, Saul Ramirez, who is right over here. Saul, 
stand up. [Applause] Thank you. Why anyone would be willing to leave 
Laredo to move to Washington is beyond me, but I'm glad he agreed.
    I always look forward to this meeting because I do believe America's 
most creative and gifted and effective public officials today are to be 
found among the mayors. I've always thought of you as friends and allies 
in doing America's work, and I've always thought that a lot of my job 
was to help you do your jobs better.
    I imagine I have been in more urban neighborhoods, meeting with more 
different kinds of people about more different kinds of issues than any 
of my predecessors. I've certainly tried to make that the case because 
when I ran for President, I knew that I needed to spend time in our 
cities, to get to know the people, the problems, and the promise of the 
cities, to connect our cities with our suburbs and make people 
understand that these problems we share are common problems and that the 
promise of America in this new century is a shared promise.
    I also believed fervently, and I still believe, that America can 
never fulfill its complete promise until all our cities fulfill theirs. 
And I have watched you--I see out in this audience--I see Mayor White 
over there with his sympathetic arm injury with my leg there. Thank you 
very much. You'll be the company misery loves for me for a while. I have 
seen so many of you work so hard day-in and day-out to fulfill your own 
dreams, and I have seen the unique culture and richness of every city.
    Mayor Abramson actually once took me to the Louisville Slugger 
baseball bat factory. For all you baseball fans, they have a bat Babe 
Ruth used in the season that he hit 60 home runs there. You can only 
find these kinds of things, uniquely, differently, in all of our cities 
in America, where the various richness and diversity of America is wound 
together in a wonderful fabric of strong, united values.
    So, to me, when I come here I think of you the way I thought of 
myself when I ran as--

[[Page 795]]

in the derogatory term that my opponent put on me in 1992--as the 
Governor of a small Southern State, because in my former life and in 
your present life, we did not get hired to make speeches and to posture, 
we got hired to mobilize people, unite people, and get things done, and 
denial was not an option. So I'm very glad to be here, and I want to 
thank you for all you have done.
    What a long way we have come. It wasn't so very long ago that huge 
numbers of Americans had just simply given up on the prospect of our 
cities. But as Secretary Cuomo's compelling report, ``The State of the 
Cities,'' proves, our cities are back. We've got the biggest economic 
resurgence in cities since World War II; the unemployment rate down by a 
third in our 50 largest cities; more downtowns coming back to life with 
sports and tourism and local business booming. Congratulation on your 
two new stadiums, Mayor Brown. We're taking back our streets from the 
worst ravages of crime. New waves of immigrants in our cities are making 
positive contributions with new energy and new businesses. And because 
of your disciplined and creative leadership, the fiscal health of our 
cities is stronger than it has been in decades. Our cities are literally 
bursting with new ideas for reform that are actually changing people's 
lives.
    I have seen what the empowerment zone has done in Detroit. I went to 
Toledo to see the oldest auto plant in America up and running and 
bursting at the seams with new employees, selling their products to 
Japan in large numbers. I have been to Boston where not a single child 
has been killed with a handgun in a year and a half. I know what the 
cities are doing, and I want America to know that the mayors of this 
country have literally changed the shared life of America in ways that 
affect not only our largest cities but our smaller cities and, as I 
said, the relationship that is inexorably intertwined between the cities 
and the suburbs.
    You have helped America come back, and I am grateful. But I also 
know, and you know, that we have much more to do. We have to have more 
jobs for those who must now leave the welfare rolls because they're 
able-bodied. We must meet the challenge of absorbing new immigrants. We 
must deal with the rising tide of juvenile violence and juvenile drug 
abuse which has in our country continued to rise even as the overall 
crime rate has dropped dramatically. We must deal with the continued 
flight of the middle class to the suburbs. We must deal with the poor 
performance of too many of our schools, with the continuing health 
problems of too many people who live in the cities, and perhaps most 
important of all, with the continuing almost physical isolation of the 
poor in our cities, most of them young adults and little children.
    During my time as President, instead of trying to either impose 
ready-made solutions from Washington or ignore the problems altogether, 
we have tried to give you and your communities the support you need and 
the tools you need to meet your own challenges, to use the National 
Government to empower local leaders, to make the grassroots progress 
that each and every one of you can celebrate.
    We started with the economic program in 1993, which replaced 
trickle-down economics with invest-and-grow economics and included a 
number of initiatives for the cities: the empowerment zones and 
enterprise communities, the community development financial 
institutions, the earned-income tax credit, the dramatic increases in 
child nutrition. We continued with the urban initiatives of HUD, led by 
former Secretary Cuomo--former Secretary Cisneros and his able team, 
including Andrew Cuomo--that included an initiative on homelessness, on 
cleaning up our housing projects, on innovative ways to empower people 
who were dependent upon public housing.
    We continued with the crime bill, which was largely written by big-
city mayors, prosecutors, and police officers. Its strategy was hotly 
disputed in the Congress by people who believed in rhetoric instead of 
reality. But the strategy is now no longer open to doubt, as we've just 
seen our 5th year of declining crime, in the last year the steepest 
decline in violent crime of all.
    We continued with the initiatives before the welfare reform law was 
signed, local initiatives in welfare which moved record numbers of 
people from welfare to work, and all the analysis showed that a great 
deal of them moved because of the local efforts that people were making.
    The key to all this was to give individuals, families, and 
communities the power and the responsibility to solve their problems and 
make the most of their own lives. I want to press forward with this 
empowerment agenda. And today I would like to briefly discuss seven 
things that I think are important if our cities and,

[[Page 796]]

therefore, our country are to reach their full promise in the 21st 
century.
    First, we've got to keep working until we extend the prosperity of 
this recovery to every neighborhood in America. Second, we have to do 
more to take back our streets from crime and especially to prevent young 
people from falling into a life that will destroy themselves and people 
around them. Third, we have to finish the job of welfare reform by 
creating enough jobs for all who can, and now must, work. Fourth, we 
have to extend the benefits of homeownership even more widely to meet 
our national goal of having more than two-thirds of the American people 
living in their own homes for the first time in history by the year 
2000. Fifth, we have to raise the standards in our schools and invest 
more in our young people. Sixth, we have to meet public health 
challenges, including HIV and AIDS. And seventh, we have to create in 
our cities our national ideal of one America that crosses all racial, 
ethnic, and other lines that divide us, committed to giving every child 
a chance to flourish and every citizen a chance to serve.
    I want to work with you to put this agenda into action. HUD must be 
a good partner, the Labor Department will be a good partner, the rest of 
our administration must be a good partner. But we are working for you, 
to help you and your people do what they know how to do to make the most 
of their lives and their prospects.
    First, let's talk about extending the benefits of the economic 
recovery. Our national economic strategy changed dramatically in 1993. 
We went from trickle-down economics to what I call invest and growth: 
reduce the deficit but invest more in our people and technology and in 
the progress of people in the future and open the world to trade in 
American products and services.
    This is clearly working. Our economy is the strongest in the world, 
the strongest it's been in a generation. America is now the world's 
number one exporter. Unemployment has been below 5 percent now for a few 
months for the first time in 24 years; inflation at its lowest point in 
30 years; over 12 million new jobs; the largest decline in income 
inequality since the 1960's; a 77 percent cut in the deficit--before the 
balanced budget agreement--a 77 percent cut in the deficit, from $290 
billion a year to less than $70 billion this year. They said we could 
not cut the deficit and invest more in our people, but they were wrong. 
And you are reaping the benefits of that.
    In this urban economic strategy that was a part, as I said, of the 
1993 economic plan, the most important thing was to try to attract 
businesses and jobs back to our cities. We've created already 105 
empowerment zones and enterprise communities, which provide a common 
combination of tax incentives and freedom from Government redtape for 
you to attract new investment. We are establishing a network of 
community development financial institutions to infuse our cities with 
capital.
    It's very interesting to me--I discovered when I became President 
that we had been funding such efforts all over the world for years in 
the poorest places in the world, places with far more limited prospects 
than poor people in the neighborhoods of America, to grow and to build 
businesses and to build a future, and we had never done it in our 
country except on a very limited basis in Chicago and a few other 
cities. Now we are trying to do that all over the Nation.
    We reformed the Community Reinvestment Act so that it works better 
to steer private capital from mainstream commercial banks into poor 
inner-city and rural communities. Now, since we reformed the Community 
Reinvestment Act there have been a number of studies which show that as 
much as $100 billion had been invested in these communities, which means 
that since the Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977, 70 percent 
of all investments it was designed to direct have been made since 1993. 
I am proud of that, and that also has contributed to the revitalization 
of many American communities.
    We also recognize that a major barrier to urban economic growth is 
the contamination of otherwise attractive sites for development, known 
to you as brownfields, a word that is still a total mystery to most 
Americans. But you know what they are, and a lot of you have cleaned 
them up. We have worked hard to make those brownfields into productive 
assets and to clean up a record number of toxic waste sites, more in the 
first 3\1/2\ years of our administration than in the previous 12 years.
    When I reached our historic bipartisan budget agreement with the 
leaders of Congress, they pledged to work with us to keep these 
initiatives going, to expand the empowerment zones, to expand the 
enterprise communities, to expand

[[Page 797]]

the brownfields tax incentives. Furthermore, they also agreed to funds 
necessary to clean up 500 more toxic waste sites, to more than double 
the amount of investment in the community development financial 
institutions, to provide for urban transportation needs for people on 
welfare who must travel to new jobs, and to help people on welfare get 
more work.
    Now, all these initiatives are essential to the health of our 
cities. They also agreed to enough funds to cover half of the 10 million 
children in America who have no health insurance. That will make a 
dramatic difference to those of you who have severe health costs that 
are unmet and unfunded in your cities.
    But on the tax side--that is, dealing with the brownfields and the 
empowerment zones and the other tax incentives for the cities--the plans 
put together by the House and Senate committees simply do not live up to 
the explicit commitment of the budget agreement, and that is wrong. I 
know that many in Congress do not share my enthusiasm for these 
programs. Many of them have never seen your reforms at work; perhaps 
they cannot be blamed for not voting for what they don't know about. But 
the truth is that that budget agreement passed by overwhelming margins 
of both parties in both Houses. And I would think every Member of 
Congress, without regard to party, would like to be known as a person 
who keeps his or her word. It is up to you to make sure that they have 
the chance to keep their words. Do not let Congress get out of the 
commitment they made on this issue.
    The second thing we have to do is to keep up with our fight against 
crime and violence. You and I know that crime's been going down for 
years and that the strategy we put together--together--of more police on 
the street, tougher punishment, fewer guns in the hands of criminals, 
and more prevention programs to give young people a chance to say yes to 
a brighter future--we know this is historically effective. We know we 
had the largest decline in crime in 36 years last year. Murders dropped 
a stunning 11 percent. Cities all around the country, including our host 
city here, have had big declines in crime. I have been on the streets of 
so many of the cities here present to see you and listen to you and your 
police officers and community leaders talk about what you've done on 
crime.
    But a nationally publicized poll just last week asked the American 
people whether crime was going up or down; 25 percent said down, and 60 
percent said up. Why is that? Partly, it takes a while for public 
perception always to catch up with reality. Partly, it's that the local 
news still leads with the crime story every night. And that's a problem 
for a lot of you and the image you're trying to fashion for your cities. 
But partly it's because, with all the drops in crime, America is a place 
with too much violence and too much crime--still, with all the progress 
we have made.
    We have to finish the job of putting 100,000 police on the street. I 
will fight to make sure we keep that commitment. We have to continue to 
push for real juvenile justice legislation. We put a bill before the 
Congress that has more prosecutors, more probation officers, more after-
school and other programs for at-risk young people. It's not very long 
on rhetoric; it's real long on results. And it basically grew out of 
what I have seen working.
    I mentioned the Boston program. I went to Houston, and Mayor Lanier 
showed me what he did, mobilizing 3,000 inner-city kids in a soccer 
league and, before Tiger Woods won the Masters, 2,500 inner-city kids in 
a golf league. Giving our children something to say yes to: that's a 
part of juvenile justice.
    I've been to places where the probation officers and the police 
officers make house calls and where people walk the streets and try to 
keep kids out of trouble. We just need a national bill which gives you 
the tools to do what you know you can do to save these kids' lives. 
That's all I want to do. And I want you to help me pass that kind of 
juvenile justice bill through the Congress, so that you can save the 
children of your cities. And I believe we can do that.
    Let me say, you can go from New York to San Diego, from Seattle and 
Portland, all the way to southern Florida, and if you go to city to city 
to city, you see that it seems to be the everyday presence of law 
enforcement officers on our streets, working with citizens, that has 
done the most to bring the crime rate down.
    We have done our part by trying to help you put 100,000 more police 
on the street. We've come a long way from 1992, when we've seen the 
violent crime rate triple in the preceding 30 years, with only a 10 
percent increase in police officers. And you have learned so much

[[Page 798]]

more about how to deploy those police officers. It's been really 
impressive.
    I want to increase that presence even more by getting police to live 
in the communities they serve. Today I am pleased to announce that over 
the coming year we will start an Officer Next Door program through HUD. 
It will make it possible for police officers and their families to buy 
HUD-owned single-family homes in our central cities at a 50 percent 
discount. You have shown me how more police officers on our streets have 
made so many of our neighborhoods feel like home again. Just imagine 
what it will be like when more police make those neighborhoods their 
homes again.
    And let me say just parenthetically--I want to give a little pat to 
Secretary Cuomo here--when I appointed him, I said, you know, I don't 
understand why HUD needs to keep all this surplus property all the time. 
Why do we need all this inventory? It's not doing any good just laying 
out there. And this is just the first of what I hope will be many 
initiatives. But if we can give these police officers and their families 
50 percent discounts to move back into the inner cities, it will be some 
of the best money the Federal Government ever spent, and we want to do 
more of those things.
    The third thing we have to do is to make sure we create jobs for the 
roughly one million people that have to move from welfare to work by the 
year 2000. Under the present welfare reform law, whatever happens to the 
economy, we have to move nearly a million people from welfare to work. 
We moved nearly a million people, about 900,000, from welfare to work in 
the last 4 years when we had welfare reform experiments going in 40 of 
the 50 States, and many of those only in part of the States. But when 
our economy in 4 years produced over 11 million new jobs, that had never 
happened before in a 4-year administration. In the next 4 years, we have 
to move that many people whether we produce 11 million more jobs or not. 
Can we do it? I believe we can.
    I know a lot of you thought I made a mistake by signing the welfare 
reform bill. Remember, I vetoed two previous bills because I thought 
they were too tough on kids and too weak on work. But when we put back 
the guarantee of nutrition and health care to our children, when we came 
up with $4 billion for child care, when we agreed to leave the funding 
at the States equal to the amount they were getting when welfare rolls 
were at their all-time high, I thought it was worth the chance to change 
the culture of dependency.
    Today, on the front page of the local newspaper, there is a study by 
the Federal Reserve of San Francisco saying that the rolls have dropped 
another 500,000 since the law came into effect, and they are now going 
down in virtually every State in the Union. We finally got a big drop 
here in California, which--because it didn't come back as quickly as the 
other States, it didn't have drops as soon. We can make this work. We 
can make this work.
    In the budget agreement, we got agreement to restore the most 
egregious cuts in aid to immigrants, which I thought were wrong, the 
cuts to legal immigrants who come here, live by the rules, and work 
hard, through no fault of their own become disabled. We are going to 
restore those cuts, and I will not sign the bill unless Congress keeps 
its commitment in the budget agreement to do that. But that's in the 
agreement.
    We have $600 billion through the Department of Transportation to 
help people on welfare travel to work, because there are a lot of cities 
in which right now, and maybe by the time the benefits run out, there 
won't be jobs but they're willing workers. There was an interesting 
study involving Atlanta not very long ago which said that in inner-city 
Atlanta, something like 80 percent of the jobs in the restaurants, fast-
food restaurants, were held by low income people who lived in the 
cities. In the suburbs, only slightly more than 50 percent were. 
Obviously, if there was more transportation availability, we could do a 
better job of moving people that have to go to work where the jobs are, 
sometimes even within the cities themselves. So Secretary Slater and I 
are committed to that.
    Most important of all, I have fought hard for--and it is in the 
budget agreement, and so far it's moving along nicely through the 
Congress--for $3 billion in welfare-to-work funds, which specifically 
gives our cities, working with the Department of Labor as well as with 
HUD and HHS and others, the resources that you need to create good jobs 
for people who can't get them otherwise. This is very important. Last 
year in Chicago there were six applicants for every entry-level job that 
opened up; in St. Louis there were nine. It is not true that these 
people don't go to work. And it is not realistic to expect that we can 
get all of them to work

[[Page 799]]

within the time deadlines unless we put this money out there where you 
can use it to create jobs, good jobs for people who need them. So I ask 
you to help me pass that in the Congress.
    Finally, let me say I know a lot of you are making new partnerships 
with the private sector. Mayor Brown told me this morning that the 
private sector here in San Francisco had pledged to him that they would 
take 2,000 people from welfare to work on their own initiative. In this 
bill there is a new tax credit, very tightly drawn, that gives a 50 
percent credit for up to $10,000 in wages for people who are hired from 
welfare to work. That also is in the budget agreement and must pass.
    Let me say, finally--I want to emphasize this again, just in case 
there are some of you who don't know it--the States of this country are 
getting over 20 percent more money today for welfare than they would 
have gotten under the old welfare law. They are still getting the same 
amount of money they got when welfare rolls were at an all-time high. We 
have had the largest reduction in welfare rolls in the history of the 
United States by far. They still have that money. What are they doing 
with it? You have to make sure that that money is spent in a way that 
helps the people, most of whom live in your jurisdictions, to go to 
work. If they need training, get them the training.
    And let me say one other thing. One of the problems we have 
ameliorated in this deal but not completely solved is what happens to 
the single men who aren't on welfare in the first place. Most Americans, 
when they talk about welfare reform, are thinking about all able-bodied 
people who are idle because of the system. The biggest social problems 
out there, I would argue, are with the young single men. What's going to 
happen to them? This money can be spent to help you put them to work.
    Now, I cannot do anything directly about that, but I implore you to 
go back to the people who represent you in the State legislatures and 
see how much money your States got, and ask them to use some of that 
money to give these young men a chance to build their lives, too, 
because they need to be a part of our future.
    The fourth thing we need to do to make our cities places that 
anybody would be proud to call home is to make it easier for people to 
have homes in our cities. Homeownership is one of the most empowering 
things we can ever do for anyone. Since I took office, 4.7 million 
people across America have become homeowners for the first time. 
Homeownership has had big, big increases. As I said, our goal is to have 
more than two-thirds of the American people in their own homes by the 
year 2000 for the first time ever.
    But you know and I know not enough homes are in our cities. In the 
last 4 years, we've reduced FHA mortgage premiums three times, to lower 
the average closing cost on a new home by $1,200. That's made a lot of 
difference to a lot of young people, and I'm proud of that. Today we're 
going to cut the premium another $200 for people if they buy homes in 
our central cities. This will bring the total reduction, since we took 
office, of closing costs to those families to $1,400.
    Also, we know that there are many hard-working families who receive 
section 8 assistance who are ready to assume the responsibility of 
owning their own homes, but they can't take the first step. HUD now has 
a very innovative program before the Congress that would allow those 
families to use their rent vouchers to help to buy a home. Today I'm 
happy to announce that Freddie Mac is going to help us launch this 
homeownership empowerment voucher initiative by financing up to 2,000 of 
these mortgages.
    Together with the Officer Next Door program, this represents almost 
$700 million in downpayment toward our priority of strengthening our 
cities family by family, by helping more people buy a home in the cities 
of America. And I hope you will support that as well.
    The fifth thing we need to do is to make sure that our schools work 
and that all our children, no matter where they live, get the best 
education in the world. I know only a few mayors actually have any 
control over the school systems in your cities, but every mayor must be 
concerned about the quality of education in your cities. We know one of 
the main reasons families continue to leave cities is they simply don't 
think the schools are doing a good enough job.
    Just this week, Hillary was visiting in a school system where junior 
high kids were talking to her about the problems they face. We know that 
these years are especially critical. But we also know our schools are 
capable of working.
    Let me just give you one example. I hope that all of you noticed 
that for the very first time since we started participating in the 
international test on math and science, our fourth

[[Page 800]]

graders--only a few thousand of them, about 13,000 of them around the 
country, took these tests, but they are representative by race, income, 
and region--scored well above the international average in math and 
science for the first time. We can make all our schools work. You know 
that, and I know it, but we have to.
    Our eighth graders are still below the international average, and 
all of you know from your own experience what happens to these kids when 
they're subject to difficult influences and tough circumstances, when 
they get into those early teenage years. That's when we're losing so 
many of them. And we have to make our schools work if we're going to 
bring them back. We just have to do it.
    We're working hard to connect every classroom in America to the 
Internet by the year 2000. Last evening I met with some representatives 
of the high-tech community who were helping us to do that. We've had 
wonderful support from industry, and a lot of your communities are just 
doing this anyway. But I'm telling you, when we've got every classroom 
and every library and every school in America connected to the Internet, 
and then when we learn to teach the parents of those children how to 
access the Internet so they can communicate, regardless of their work 
schedules, with the teachers--``Was my kid in school today?''--with the 
principals--``What can I do to help?''--when we do that, we are going to 
revolutionize learning in this country. We will democratize it for the 
first time ever. And it won't matter whether a child is living on a 
Native American reservation or an inner-city neighborhood in Los Angeles 
or remote town in the Ozarks of north Arkansas; they will all be able to 
get the same learning in the same way at the same time, for the first 
time in history. And all of us, whether we have direct responsibility 
for the schools or not, have an obligation to get that done as quickly 
as possible.
    Secretary Riley and I are working to mobilize a million volunteers, 
to make sure that by the year 2000 every 8-year-old, wherever he or she 
lives and whatever their native language is, can read independently by 
the third grade. That is also terribly important.
    We're working to make sure that 100,000 teachers in America are 
certified as master teachers, so that in every school building in the 
country there will be at least one teacher that you know has had the 
finest training available and passed the most rigorous standards that 
can then be imparted to other teachers in the school building. And above 
all, we have challenged our schools to set and meet high national 
standards.
    Let me say, I am gratified that education officials representing 
over 20 percent of the children we educate in this country have agreed 
to participate in national exams like the international tests of reading 
for fourth graders and math for eighth graders by the year 1999. But a 
lot of people are holding back in these States. They say, ``We don't 
want the Federal Government to take this over.'' The Federal Government 
has nothing to do with it, except we're paying for the test.
    The vast majority of our States today participate in a National 
Assessment of Educational Progress, but they only give the test to a 
representative sample. They don't give it to all the kids in all the 
school districts in America.
    Look at these last international tests. We have nothing to be afraid 
of. The only thing that's going to wreck our schools is if we hide our 
head in the sand, we don't say what the standards are, we don't measure 
whether our kids are meeting them, and we say, well, they just can't 
make it because they're poor or they come from some disadvantaged 
background. That is a load of bull. We need to get this out in the open 
and make sure all of our kids can meet these standards.
    I spent a couple of hours with Mayor Daley and the people that are 
operating the Chicago school system not very long ago. The Chicago 
school system used to be known as the school system that went on strike 
every year whether they needed to or not. [Laughter] Every year in the 
Chicago paper--when I served as Governor and Jim Thompson was a Governor 
and his child was a student in the schools, there was always--you could 
just wait for--a certain time of the year, there would be a picture of 
little Samantha Thompson, who wouldn't be in school because the strike 
was going on. Now the Chicago schools are known for moving aggressively 
to stop social promotion, to raise performance, and that the city will 
take over the schools that are failing and straighten them up. We can do 
this. We can all do this.
    The sixth thing we have to do is to do more to deal with issues of 
public health. And let me say something especially about HIV and AIDS, 
because it grips so many of our cities,

[[Page 801]]

it costs so much money, but far more important, it costs so much in 
human lives and trauma.
    Last month I issued a call to find an AIDS vaccine within the next 
10 years. We have continued to dramatically increase the amount of money 
we're putting into research for that purpose alone, while having 
dramatic increases in care, prevention, and other basic research.
    Yesterday in Denver, the other leading industrial nations of the 
world pledged to help us meet that challenge. But until there is a 
vaccine, you have to help us, and we have to do more in the area of 
prevention. It's our strongest weapon. That's why we have to continue to 
identify sound public health strategies that enable local communities to 
address the twin epidemics of AIDS and substance abuse, and you know 
better than anyone how intertwined they are. We will continue to work to 
provide the best treatment, the best services, the finest drugs. And we 
will help you to meet the cost.
    And let me also say, we can't stop until we find a cure to bring a 
permanent end to the epidemic, nor can we limit our efforts only to HIV 
and AIDS. We know that in the 21st century, as people move around the 
world more rapidly, one of the single most significant security threats 
of the future will be the spread of infectious diseases that are no more 
than the airline flight of one infected persons on another continent 
away from your community. We know that.
    We have got to build up our public health infrastructures, and we 
have to make sure that we have basic health services out there for all 
our children, which is why I say, again, one of the most important 
aspects of this new budget agreement is the funds it gives us to give 
health insurance to half the 10 million kids who don't have it. We need 
to keep going until every child in every community in America has health 
insurance coverage and the people that are providing health care can get 
reimbursement so we can build a network to protect our kids to give them 
good health and to deal with the challenges that are bound to come to 
American cities in the future.
    The last thing I want to ask you to do is to make our cities the 
model of the one America we're trying to create, which deals not only 
with the racial initiative that I announced in San Diego 9 days ago but 
also with the primary purpose of the Presidents' Summit of Service that 
Mayor Rendell hosted in Philadelphia not very long ago.
    Keep in mind, the purpose of the Summit of Service was quite 
specific. It was to save every child in America; to give every child a 
safe place to grow up; every child the health care he or she needs; 
every child a decent education so they'll be able to support themselves 
when they get out of school; every child a mentor who needs it--every 
single one a mentor, one-on-one, who needs it; and every child the 
chance to engage in citizen service.
    Now, what's our job at the national level? An adequate education 
budget; a better health care effort; a crime program that will really 
work in the area of juvenile justice to give you the tools you need; and 
the work we do to help provide AmeriCorps volunteers that have done so 
much to help you fulfill your mission in city after city in America.
    But you have to help us do that. That was not a one-time public 
relations stunt for me. I agreed to do that Presidents' Summit of 
Service because it had a very sharply defined mission and because it did 
not let me off the hook and it did not let Government off the hook. It 
said, we can't expect volunteers to replace what is the public's 
responsibility in education, health care, and public safety, but neither 
can you expect just that responsibility to change the lives of these 
children who are physically isolated.
    I see Mayor Menino looking at me there. He may get some money from 
the Federal Government to hire police, but they decided that they'd have 
police and probation officers make house calls to kids in trouble, and 
they have an astonishing 70 percent compliance with probation orders in 
the city of Boston. I feel quite confident that that is virtually 
unheard of in America.
    So there are things that you have to do. And there are things that 
even you can't do to give all these kids mentors. But you can get people 
to do that and then give them a chance to serve. Our national survey 
before that summit showed that 90 percent of the children in this 
country said they would--including the poorest kids--said they would be 
happy to engage in service themselves, but someone needed to ask them 
and tell them what to do. That is the job of adults.
    So I want you to understand, I intend to do my job that I promised 
to do at the Summit

[[Page 802]]

of Service. You have a role to play, but we have to recognize that it 
doesn't matter how rich we are, it doesn't matter how successful we are, 
if we keep raising generation after generation of poor children that are 
literally physically isolated from the rest of us, this country will 
never fulfill the American dream. And we don't have to put up with it. 
And you can help us change it.
    And the last thing I want to say about this dialog on race is that 
it is the cities that have the biggest stake in this endeavor. Today, 
Hawaii is the only State in America that has no majority race. But no 
one who has ever been there doubts it is very much an American place, 
patriotic, upbeat, entrepreneurial. Within 3 or 4 years, California will 
have no majority race. Within 30 years, there will be no majority race 
in the country. Today, in Mayor Archer's home county, there are people 
from 146 different racial and ethnic groups.
    Now, people expect that in southern California. But we're talking 
about Michigan, in the heartland. No one--I would say no one--virtually 
no one has stopped to think about what America will be like in a 
generation. And you say, well, Bosnia at least couldn't happen here. 
That's probably true because we have too much stake in our shared 
prosperity. But don't forget how quickly people who live together as 
neighbors for generation after generation have turned on each other, in 
Africa, in Bosnia. Don't forget how totally irrational it seems to us as 
outsiders, especially those of us who are Irish, that our relatives in 
Northern Ireland continue with what we think of as madness in the face 
of all the evidence that the world and the 20-odd percent of us who are 
Americans are dying to help them rebuild a better future than they could 
ever imagine if they would just give up hating each other because of 
600-year-old disputes rooted in their religious differences.
    We have a chance here to do something that has never been done in 
all of human history, since people first began together in tribes before 
there was a written history and identified people who looked different 
from them and lived different from them as their potential enemies. We 
have a chance to rewrite the rules of human evolution, almost, by 
building the world's first truly great multiracial, multiethnic 
democracy. And it will have to be done in the cities where the people 
are.
    So I say to you, we have an opportunity here because we're doing 
this not after some riots, not because we know there's a big, long 
legislative agenda that needs to be passed but because we know there is 
still prejudice and discrimination and, maybe even more important, still 
stereotyping which blinds us to the possibilities of our people.
    Why do you really think that so many people are reluctant to belly 
up to the bar and participate in these national tests? Not because 
they're afraid that the test scores will be bad the first time, but 
because they're afraid they'll never get any better, because of our 
stereotyping, the shackles in our minds. We cannot afford it. The cities 
cannot afford it.
    The cities of America are bursting with excitement and success. 
There's hardly a one you can go to that just doesn't fill you with the 
human potential and connections that are being made. We have to make 
that the rule in America. We have to make that the order of the day. We 
have to make that the governing public philosophy of all our citizens. 
And if we do, our lives will be a lot more fun and a lot more 
interesting. And being a mayor will be even more exciting 10 years from 
now and 20 years from now and 30 years from now than it is today.
    So I say to you, all the other things I said, none of it will 
happen, and you know it won't happen, unless we learn to live together, 
relishing, celebrating, loving our diversity but being bound by things 
that are even more important.
    Thank you, and God bless you.

Note: The President spoke at 9:50 a.m. at the Fairmont Hotel. In his 
remarks, he referred to J. Thomas Cochran, executive director, United 
States Conference of Mayors; professional golfer Tiger Woods; James R. 
Thompson, former Governor of Illinois, and his daughter, Samantha; and 
the following mayors: Willie Brown of San Francisco, CA; Richard M. 
Daley of Chicago, IL; Paul Helmke of Fort Wayne, IN; Deedee Corradini of 
Salt Lake City, UT; Norman B. Rice of Seattle, WA, and his wife, 
Constance; Wellington Webb of Denver, CO, and his wife, Wilma; Michael 
R. White of Cleveland, OH; Jerry E. Abramson of Louisville, KY; Bob 
Lanier of Houston, TX; Edward Rendell of Philadelphia, PA; Thomas Menino 
of Boston, MA; and Dennis W. Archer of Detroit, MI.

[[Page 803]]